Proposed Continued Information Collection Activity; Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative (OMB Number: 0970-0484), 17168-17170 [2019-08247]
Download as PDF
17168
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2019 / Notices
Improving Head Start for School Readiness
Act of 2007 and the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2017.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–08248 Filed 4–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Native Employment Works
(NEW) Program Plan Guidance and
Report Requirements, (OMB No.: 0970–
0174)
Division of Tribal TANF
Management, Office of Family
Assistance, Administration for Children
and Families, HHS.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Request for Public Comment.
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF) is
requesting a three-year extension of the
form OFA–0086, NEW Plan Guidance
and NEW Program Report (OMB #0970–
0174, expiration 7/31/2019). There are
changes requested to these forms,
including the deletion of guidance for
NEW programs included in Public Law
102–477 programs.
DATES: Comments due within 60 days of
publication. In compliance with the
requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
the Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed
collection of information can be
obtained and comments may be
forwarded by emailing infocollection@
acf.hhs.gov. Alternatively, copies can
SUMMARY:
also be obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE
Reports Clearance Officer. All requests,
emailed or written, should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The NEW program plan
guidance documents specify the
information needed to complete a NEW
program plan and explains the process
for plan submission every third year and
to complete the annual program report.
The program plan is the application for
NEW program funding and documents
how the grantee will carry out its NEW
program. The program report provides
HHS, Congress, and grantees
information to document and assess the
activities and accomplishments of the
NEW program.
Respondents: Indian tribes and tribal
coalitions that run NEW programs.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Total
number of
respondents
Instrument
Annual
number of
respondents
1 15
NEW program plan guidance for non-477 Tribes ...............
NEW program report ............................................................
Number of
responses per
respondent
15
44
2 44
1
1
Average
burden hours
per response
29
15
Annual
burden hours
435
660
1 We estimate that 44 of the 78 NEW grantees will not include their NEW programs in Public Law 102–477 projects. 44 grantees divided by 3
(because grantees submit the NEW plan once every 3 years) = 15.
2 We estimate that 44 of the 78 NEW grantees will not include their NEW programs in Public Law 102–477 projects and therefore will submit
the NEW program report to HHS.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1095.
Comments: The Department
specifically requests comments on (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Continued Information
Collection Activity; Evaluation of the
Child Welfare Capacity Building
Collaborative (OMB Number: 0970–
0484)
Children’s Bureau,
Administration for Children and
Families; HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2019–08249 Filed 4–23–19; 8:45 am]
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF) is
requesting a three-year extension of the
previously approved forms that include
satisfaction surveys; a leadership
interview protocol; a web-based
collaboration survey; assessment tools;
and service-specific feedback forms
(OMB #0970–0484, expiration 8/31/
2019). There are no changes to the
forms.
BILLING CODE 4184–36–P
DATES:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 612.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Apr 23, 2019
SUMMARY:
Comments due within 60 days of
publication. In compliance with the
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
the Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed
collection of information can be
obtained and comments may be
forwarded by emailing infocollection@
acf.hhs.gov. Alternatively, copies can
also be obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE
Reports Clearance Officer. All requests,
emailed or written, should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The Evaluation of the
Child Welfare Capacity Building
Collaborative is sponsored by the
Children’s Bureau, Administration for
Children and Families of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services. The Capacity Building
Collaborative includes three centers
(Center for States, Center for Tribes,
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
17169
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2019 / Notices
Center for Courts) funded by the
Children’s Bureau to provide national
child welfare expertise and evidenceinformed training and technical
assistance services to state, tribal and
territorial public child welfare agencies
and Court Improvement Programs
(CIPs). The Centers offer a wide array of
services including, but not limited to:
Web-based content and resources,
product development and
dissemination, self-directed and groupbased training, virtual learning and peer
networking events, and tailored
consultation and coaching. During the
project period, Center services are
evaluated by both Center-specific
evaluations and a Cross-Center
Evaluation. The Center-specific
evaluations are designed to collect data
on Center-specific processes and
outcomes, which are used to support
service delivery and continuous quality
improvement. The Cross-Center
Evaluation is designed to respond to a
set of cross-cutting evaluation questions
posed by the Children’s Bureau. The
Cross-Center Evaluation examines: How
and to what extent key partners across
and within Centers collaborate; whether
Center capacity building service
interventions are evaluable; the degree
to which Centers follow common
protocols; what service interventions are
delivered and in what services do
jurisdictions participate; how satisfied
recipients are with services; what
outcomes are achieved in jurisdictions
receiving Center services and under
what conditions are services effective;
and what are the costs of services.
The Cross-Center Evaluation uses a
longitudinal, mixed methods approach
to evaluate Center services as they
develop and mature over the course of
the study. Multiple data collection
strategies are used to efficiently capture
quantitative and qualitative data to
enable analyses that address each
evaluation question. Cross-Center
Evaluation data sources for this effort
include (1) satisfaction surveys to assess
recipient satisfaction with services, such
as the Learning Experiences Satisfaction
Survey; (2) a leadership interview used
to assess perceptions of state child
welfare directors, tribal child welfare
directors, and CIP directors; and (3) a
web-based collaboration survey used to
assess perceptions of collaboration
within and between the capacity
building centers. Center-specific data
sources for this effort include (1)
assessment tools such as the Center for
Tribes Needs and Fit Exploration Tools;
and (2) service-specific feedback forms,
such as the Center for States Intensive
Projects instrument and the Center for
Courts CQI Workshops instrument.
Respondents: Respondents of data
collection instruments include (1) child
welfare and judicial professionals who
use the Collaborative’s products and
online courses, that participate in
webinars, virtual or in-person trainings,
or peer events, and that receive brief or
intensive tailored services from the
Centers; (2) all State child welfare
directors, and Tribal child welfare
directors, and CIP coordinators that
receive services from the Centers; and
(3) directors and staff of the three
Capacity Building Centers.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Total
number of
respondents
Instrument
Web Pages and Products Satisfaction Survey ....................
Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey (single) 1 ...........
Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey (intensive) 2 ......
Webinars, Events, and In-Person Meetings Satisfaction
Survey ..............................................................................
Center for States Information and Referral Survey .............
Center for States Intensive Projects Survey .......................
Center for States Constituency Groups Surveys ................
Center for States Brief Tailored Services Survey ...............
Center for Tribes Contact Form ...........................................
Center for Tribes Demographic Survey ...............................
Center for Tribes Needs and Fit Exploration Tool Phase 1
Center for Tribes Needs and Fit Exploration Tool Phase 2
CIP Annual Meeting Survey ................................................
Center for Courts CQI Workshops Survey ..........................
Assessment and Capacity Building Work Plan Satisfaction
Survey ..............................................................................
Leadership Interview—States and Territories .....................
Leadership Interview—CIPs ................................................
Leadership Interview—Tribes ..............................................
Leadership Interview Part II—Tribes ...................................
Annual Collaboration Survey ...............................................
Total ..............................................................................
1 For
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
2 For
Annual
number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total annual
burden hours
6,240
2,000
3,600
2,080
666
1200
1
1
1
.08
.33
.08
166
220
96
22,008
48
1,320
1,600
500
200
80
120
100
800
192
7,336
16
440
533
166
22
26
40
33
266
63
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.08
.05
.33
.33
.33
.05
1.75
1.5
3.0
.13
.17
587
1
290
352
55
1
46
60
99
35
11
1,800
52
52
32
32
920
600
17
17
10
10
306
1
2
2
2
2
1
.066
1
1
1.25
.67
.36
40
34
34
25
13
110
........................
........................
........................
........................
2,275
Learning Experiences that consist of a single event (e.g., on-line session or in-person training).
more intensive Learning Experiences that require administration of multiple surveys over a series of events, modules, or units.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 2,275.
Comments: The Department
specifically requests comments on (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Apr 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
17170
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2019 / Notices
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5106.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–08247 Filed 4–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0232]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Interstate Shellfish
Dealer’s Certificate
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by May 24,
2019.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202–
395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0021. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug
Administration, Three White Flint
North, 10A–12M, 11601 Landsdown St.,
North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301–796–
3794, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
SUMMARY:
Interstate Shellfish Dealer’s Certificate
OMB Control Number 0910–0021—
Revision
Under section 243 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 243) FDA
is required to cooperate with and aid
State and local authorities in the
enforcement of their health regulations,
and is authorized to assist States in the
prevention and suppression of
communicable diseases. Under this
authority, we participate with State
regulatory agencies, some foreign
nations, and the molluscan shellfish
industry in the National Shellfish
Sanitation Program (NSSP). NSSP is a
voluntary, cooperative program to
promote the safety of molluscan
shellfish by providing for the
classification and patrol of shellfish
growing waters and for the inspection
and certification of shellfish processors.
Each NSSP-participating State and
foreign nation monitors its molluscan
shellfish processors and for purposes of
interstate or international commerce
issues certificates for those that meet the
State or foreign shellfish control
authority’s criteria. Each participating
State and nation provides a certificate of
its certified shellfish processors to FDA
on Form FDA 3038, ‘‘Interstate Shellfish
Dealer’s Certificate.’’ We use this
information to publish the ‘‘Interstate
Certified Shellfish Shippers List,’’ a
monthly comprehensive listing of all
molluscan shellfish processors certified
under the cooperative program. If we
did not collect the information
necessary to compile this list,
participating States would not be able to
identify and keep out shellfish
processed by uncertified processors in
other States and foreign nations.
Consequently, NSSP would not be able
to control the distribution of uncertified
and possibly unsafe shellfish in
interstate and international commerce,
and its effectiveness would be nullified.
In the Federal Register of March 9,
2018 (83 FR 10487), we published a
notice seeking comment on a proposed
determination that the European
Union’s (EU’s) system of food safety
control measures for raw bivalve
molluscan shellfish intended for export
into the United States, as adopted and
implemented in Spain and the
Netherlands, provides at least the same
level of sanitary protection as the
United States equivalent. If finalized,
such a determination would permit the
importation of shellfish harvested from
certain European production areas and
processed by European establishments
that have been listed by FDA on the
Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers
List.
The March 9, 2018, notice also
described the European Commission’s
(EC’s) determination that the United
States’ system is equivalent to its own,
and as a result of that determination, its
stated intent to accept shellfish from
certain growing areas in the United
States. On November 6, 2018, the EC
published Commission Implementing
Decision (EU) 2018/1668 which added
the United States (MA and WA only) to
the list of Third Countries from which
molluscan shellfish imports are
permitted. Shellfish harvested from
growing areas with an Approved
classification in those states are eligible
for export to the EU.
As part of the equivalence
determination, the EC identified the
need for FDA to provide documentation
collected from NSSP-participating
shellfish control authorities seeking
recognition under the EC’s equivalence
determination. This documentation
includes:
• A list of growing areas with an
Approved classification,
• The most recent sanitary survey for
each growing area with an Approved
classification, and
• The most recent inspection report
for each firm seeking to export shellfish
to the EU.
For NSSP-Participants that do not
produce live/raw shellfish required
documentation is limited to the most
recent Plant and Shipping Element
Program Evaluation Report and the most
recent inspection report for each
shellfish processing firm to be listed for
export to the EU.
In the Federal Register of June 8, 2018
(83 FR 26699), we published a 60-day
notice requesting public comment on
the proposed collection of information.
No comments were received.
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Activity
FDA form No.
Submission of Interstate Shellfish
Dealer’s Certificate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Apr 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
Number of
respondents
3038
PO 00000
Number of
responses per
respondent
40
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
57
Sfmt 4703
Total
annual
responses
2,280
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
Average burden per
response
0.10 (6 minutes) ........
24APN1
Total hours
228
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17168-17170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08247]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Proposed Continued Information Collection Activity; Evaluation of
the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative (OMB Number: 0970-
0484)
AGENCY: Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families;
HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administration for Children and Families (ACF) is
requesting a three-year extension of the previously approved forms that
include satisfaction surveys; a leadership interview protocol; a web-
based collaboration survey; assessment tools; and service-specific
feedback forms (OMB #0970-0484, expiration 8/31/2019). There are no
changes to the forms.
DATES: Comments due within 60 days of publication. In compliance with
the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting
public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection
described above.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed collection of information can be
obtained and comments may be forwarded by emailing
[email protected]. Alternatively, copies can also be obtained
by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20201, Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. All requests, emailed or
written, should be identified by the title of the information
collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building
Collaborative is sponsored by the Children's Bureau, Administration for
Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. The Capacity Building Collaborative includes three centers
(Center for States, Center for Tribes,
[[Page 17169]]
Center for Courts) funded by the Children's Bureau to provide national
child welfare expertise and evidence-informed training and technical
assistance services to state, tribal and territorial public child
welfare agencies and Court Improvement Programs (CIPs). The Centers
offer a wide array of services including, but not limited to: Web-based
content and resources, product development and dissemination, self-
directed and group-based training, virtual learning and peer networking
events, and tailored consultation and coaching. During the project
period, Center services are evaluated by both Center-specific
evaluations and a Cross-Center Evaluation. The Center-specific
evaluations are designed to collect data on Center-specific processes
and outcomes, which are used to support service delivery and continuous
quality improvement. The Cross-Center Evaluation is designed to respond
to a set of cross-cutting evaluation questions posed by the Children's
Bureau. The Cross-Center Evaluation examines: How and to what extent
key partners across and within Centers collaborate; whether Center
capacity building service interventions are evaluable; the degree to
which Centers follow common protocols; what service interventions are
delivered and in what services do jurisdictions participate; how
satisfied recipients are with services; what outcomes are achieved in
jurisdictions receiving Center services and under what conditions are
services effective; and what are the costs of services.
The Cross-Center Evaluation uses a longitudinal, mixed methods
approach to evaluate Center services as they develop and mature over
the course of the study. Multiple data collection strategies are used
to efficiently capture quantitative and qualitative data to enable
analyses that address each evaluation question. Cross-Center Evaluation
data sources for this effort include (1) satisfaction surveys to assess
recipient satisfaction with services, such as the Learning Experiences
Satisfaction Survey; (2) a leadership interview used to assess
perceptions of state child welfare directors, tribal child welfare
directors, and CIP directors; and (3) a web-based collaboration survey
used to assess perceptions of collaboration within and between the
capacity building centers. Center-specific data sources for this effort
include (1) assessment tools such as the Center for Tribes Needs and
Fit Exploration Tools; and (2) service-specific feedback forms, such as
the Center for States Intensive Projects instrument and the Center for
Courts CQI Workshops instrument.
Respondents: Respondents of data collection instruments include (1)
child welfare and judicial professionals who use the Collaborative's
products and online courses, that participate in webinars, virtual or
in-person trainings, or peer events, and that receive brief or
intensive tailored services from the Centers; (2) all State child
welfare directors, and Tribal child welfare directors, and CIP
coordinators that receive services from the Centers; and (3) directors
and staff of the three Capacity Building Centers.
Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Instrument Total number Annual number responses per hours per Total annual
of respondents of respondents respondent response burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Pages and Products 6,240 2,080 1 .08 166
Satisfaction Survey............
Learning Experiences 2,000 666 1 .33 220
Satisfaction Survey (single)
\1\............................
Learning Experiences 3,600 1200 1 .08 96
Satisfaction Survey (intensive)
\2\............................
Webinars, Events, and In-Person 22,008 7,336 1 .08 587
Meetings Satisfaction Survey...
Center for States Information 48 16 1 .05 1
and Referral Survey............
Center for States Intensive 1,320 440 2 .33 290
Projects Survey................
Center for States Constituency 1,600 533 2 .33 352
Groups Surveys.................
Center for States Brief Tailored 500 166 1 .33 55
Services Survey................
Center for Tribes Contact Form.. 200 22 1 .05 1
Center for Tribes Demographic 80 26 1 1.75 46
Survey.........................
Center for Tribes Needs and Fit 120 40 1 1.5 60
Exploration Tool Phase 1.......
Center for Tribes Needs and Fit 100 33 1 3.0 99
Exploration Tool Phase 2.......
CIP Annual Meeting Survey....... 800 266 1 .13 35
Center for Courts CQI Workshops 192 63 1 .17 11
Survey.........................
Assessment and Capacity Building 1,800 600 1 .066 40
Work Plan Satisfaction Survey..
Leadership Interview--States and 52 17 2 1 34
Territories....................
Leadership Interview--CIPs...... 52 17 2 1 34
Leadership Interview--Tribes.... 32 10 2 1.25 25
Leadership Interview Part II-- 32 10 2 .67 13
Tribes.........................
Annual Collaboration Survey..... 920 306 1 .36 110
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 2,275
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For Learning Experiences that consist of a single event (e.g., on-line session or in-person training).
\2\ For more intensive Learning Experiences that require administration of multiple surveys over a series of
events, modules, or units.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,275.
Comments: The Department specifically requests comments on (a)
whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
[[Page 17170]]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5106.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019-08247 Filed 4-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P