Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 17089-17091 [2019-08179]
Download as PDF
17089
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 79
Wednesday, April 24, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–18–0105; SC19–932–1
PR]
Olives Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement a recommendation from the
California Olive Committee (Committee)
to increase the assessment rate
established for the 2019 fiscal year and
subsequent fiscal years. The assessment
rate would remain in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathie Notoro, Marketing Specialist or
Terry Vawter, Regional Director,
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 538–
1672, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Kathie.Notoro@usda.gov or
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202)720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 932, as
amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating
the handling of olives grown in
California. Part 932 (referred to as the
‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Committee locally administers the
Order and is comprised of producers
and handlers of olives operating within
the area of production, and one public
member.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This proposed rule
falls within a category of regulatory
actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) exempted from
Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this proposed
rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not
trigger the requirements contained in
Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the Order now in
effect, California olive handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the Order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate would be applicable to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
all assessable olives beginning on
January 1, 2019, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
The Order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members are familiar with the
Committee’s needs and with the costs of
goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed in a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
This proposed rule would increase
the assessment rate from $24.00 per ton
of assessed olives, the rate that was
established for the 2017–18 and
subsequent fiscal years, to $44.00 per
ton of assessed olives for the 2019 and
subsequent fiscal years. The proposed
higher rate is a result of a significantly
reduced crop size, a late season freeze,
and the need to cover Committee
expenses.
The Committee met on December 11,
2018, and unanimously recommended
2019 expenditures of $1,628,923, and an
assessment rate of $44.00 per ton of
assessed olives. In comparison, last
year’s budgeted expenditures were
$1,749,477. The proposed assessment
rate of $44.00 is $20.00 higher than the
rate currently in effect. Producer
receipts show a yield of 17,953 tons of
E:\FR\FM\24APP1.SGM
24APP1
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
17090
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2019 / Proposed Rules
assessable olives from the 2018 crop
year. This is substantially less than the
2017 crop year, which yielded 90,188
tons of assessable olives. The 2019 fiscal
year assessment rate increase is
necessary to ensure the Committee has
sufficient revenue to fund the
recommended 2019 budgeted
expenditures while ensuring the funds
in the financial reserve would be kept
within the maximum permitted by
§ 932.40.
The Order has a fiscal year and a crop
year that are independent of each other.
The crop year is a 12-month period that
begins on August 1 of each year and
ends on July 31 of the following year.
The fiscal year is the 12-month period
that begins on January 1 and ends on
December 31 of each year. Olives are an
alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop
followed by a large crop. For this
assessment rate proposed rule, the
actual 2018 crop year receipts are used
to determine the assessment rate for the
2019 fiscal year.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2019 fiscal year includes $713,900 for
program administration, $513,500 for
marketing activities, and $343,523 for
research, and $58,000 for inspection
equipment. Budgeted expenses for these
items during the 2018 fiscal year were
$401,200 for program administration,
$973,500 for marketing activities,
$297,777 for research, and $77,000
inspection equipment.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee resulted from
consideration of anticipated fiscal year
expenses, actual olive tonnage received
by handlers during the 2018 crop year,
and the amount in the Committee’s
financial reserve. Income derived from
handler assessments, along with interest
income and funds from the Committee’s
authorized reserve will be adequate to
cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the
reserve will be kept within the
maximum permitted by the Order of
approximately one fiscal year’s
expenses.
The assessment rate proposed in this
rule would continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate would
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee would continue to meet
prior to or during each fiscal year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s budget for subsequent
fiscal years would be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
proposed rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 1,100
producers of olives in the production
area and two handlers subject to
regulation under the Order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based upon National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) information as
of June 2018, the average price to
producers for the 2017 crop year was
$974.00 per ton, and total assessable
volume for the 2018 crop year was
17,953 tons. Based on production, price
paid to producers, and the total number
of California olive producers, the
average annual producer revenue is less
than $750,000 ($974.00 times 17,953
tons equals $17,486,222 divided by
1,100 producers equals an average
annual producer revenue of $15,896.57).
Thus, the majority of olive producers
may be classified as small entities. Both
of the handlers may be classified as
large entities under the SBA’s
definitions because their annual receipts
are greater than $7,500,000.
This proposal would increase the
assessment rate collected from handlers
for the 2019 and subsequent fiscal years
from $24.00 to $44.00 per ton of
assessable olives. The Committee
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
unanimously recommended 2019
expenditures of $1,628,923 and an
assessment rate of $44.00 per ton of
assessable olives. The recommended
assessment rate of $44.00 is $20.00
higher than the 2018 rate. The quantity
of assessable olives for the 2019 Fiscal
year is 17,953 tons. Thus, the $44.00
rate should provide $789,932 in
assessment revenue. The higher
assessment rate is needed because
annual receipts for the 2018 crop year
are 17,953 tons compared to 90,188 tons
for the 2017 crop year. Olives are an
alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop
followed by a large crop. Income
derived from the $44.00 per ton
assessment rate, along with funds from
the authorized reserve and interest
income, should be adequate to meet this
fiscal year’s expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2019 fiscal year include $713,900 for
program administration, $513,500 for
marketing activities, $343,523 for
research, and $58,000 for inspection
equipment. Budgeted expenses for these
items during the 2018 fiscal year were
$401,200 for program administration,
$973,500 for marketing activities,
$297,777 for research, and $77,000 for
inspection equipment. The Committee
deliberated on many of the expenses,
weighed the relative value of various
programs or projects, and increased
their expenses for marketing and
research activities.
Prior to arriving at this budget and
assessment rate, the Committee
considered information from various
sources including the Committee’s
Executive, Marketing, Inspection, and
Research Subcommittees. Alternate
expenditure levels were discussed by
these groups, based upon the relative
value of various projects to the olive
industry and the increased olive
production. The assessment rate of
$44.00 per ton of assessable olives was
derived by considering anticipated
expenses, the low volume of assessable
olives, a late season freeze, and
additional pertinent factors.
A review of NASS information
indicates that the average producer
price for the 2017 crop year was $974.00
per ton. Therefore, utilizing the
assessment rate of $44.00 per ton, the
assessment revenue for the 2019 fiscal
year as a percentage of total producer
revenue would be approximately 4.52
percent.
This proposed action would increase
the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs
E:\FR\FM\24APP1.SGM
24APP1
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2019 / Proposed Rules
may be passed on to producers.
However, these costs would be offset by
the benefits derived by the operation of
the Order. In addition, the Committee’s
meeting was widely publicized
throughout the production area. The
olive industry and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the December 11, 2018,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
Interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
information collection impacts of this
action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 Vegetable
Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large California olive handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this action.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously-mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. All written
comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination
is made on this rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Marketing agreements, Olives,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 932 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 932.230
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2019, an
assessment rate of $44.00 per ton is
established for California olives.
Dated: April 18, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–08179 Filed 4–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–19–0011; SC19–966–2
PR]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida;
Redistricting and Reapportionment of
Producer Districts
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement a recommendation from the
Florida Tomato Committee (Committee)
to redistrict and reapportion producer
representation on the Committee
currently prescribed under the
marketing order for tomatoes grown in
Florida. This action would reduce the
number of districts from four to two and
reapportion producer membership on
the Committee to provide equitable
representation from both districts.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17091
internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven W. Kauffman, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen,
Regional Director, Southeast Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863)
324–3375, Fax: (863) 291–8614, or
Email: Steven.Kauffman@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 125 and Order No. 966,
as amended (7 CFR part 966), regulating
the handling of tomatoes grown in
Florida. Part 966 (referred to as the
‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Committee locally administers the
Order and is comprised of producers
operating within the production area.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this proposed rule does not
meet the definition of a significant
regulatory action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
E:\FR\FM\24APP1.SGM
24APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17089-17091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08179]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84 , No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 17089]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-18-0105; SC19-932-1 PR]
Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the
California Olive Committee (Committee) to increase the assessment rate
established for the 2019 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years. The
assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available
to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals
or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet
at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathie Notoro, Marketing Specialist or
Terry Vawter, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS,
USDA; Telephone: (559) 538-1672, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email:
[email protected] or [email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202)720-8938, or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under
Marketing Agreement and Order No. 932, as amended (7 CFR part 932),
regulating the handling of olives grown in California. Part 932
(referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally
administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of
olives operating within the area of production, and one public member.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This proposed
rule falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the definition
of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017).
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Under the Order now in effect, California olive
handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order are
derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate
would be applicable to all assessable olives beginning on January 1,
2019, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
The Order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval
of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members are
familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs of goods and
services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an
appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly
affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input.
This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate from $24.00
per ton of assessed olives, the rate that was established for the 2017-
18 and subsequent fiscal years, to $44.00 per ton of assessed olives
for the 2019 and subsequent fiscal years. The proposed higher rate is a
result of a significantly reduced crop size, a late season freeze, and
the need to cover Committee expenses.
The Committee met on December 11, 2018, and unanimously recommended
2019 expenditures of $1,628,923, and an assessment rate of $44.00 per
ton of assessed olives. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $1,749,477. The proposed assessment rate of $44.00 is
$20.00 higher than the rate currently in effect. Producer receipts show
a yield of 17,953 tons of
[[Page 17090]]
assessable olives from the 2018 crop year. This is substantially less
than the 2017 crop year, which yielded 90,188 tons of assessable
olives. The 2019 fiscal year assessment rate increase is necessary to
ensure the Committee has sufficient revenue to fund the recommended
2019 budgeted expenditures while ensuring the funds in the financial
reserve would be kept within the maximum permitted by Sec. 932.40.
The Order has a fiscal year and a crop year that are independent of
each other. The crop year is a 12-month period that begins on August 1
of each year and ends on July 31 of the following year. The fiscal year
is the 12-month period that begins on January 1 and ends on December 31
of each year. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop
followed by a large crop. For this assessment rate proposed rule, the
actual 2018 crop year receipts are used to determine the assessment
rate for the 2019 fiscal year.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2019
fiscal year includes $713,900 for program administration, $513,500 for
marketing activities, and $343,523 for research, and $58,000 for
inspection equipment. Budgeted expenses for these items during the 2018
fiscal year were $401,200 for program administration, $973,500 for
marketing activities, $297,777 for research, and $77,000 inspection
equipment.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee resulted from
consideration of anticipated fiscal year expenses, actual olive tonnage
received by handlers during the 2018 crop year, and the amount in the
Committee's financial reserve. Income derived from handler assessments,
along with interest income and funds from the Committee's authorized
reserve will be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the
reserve will be kept within the maximum permitted by the Order of
approximately one fiscal year's expenses.
The assessment rate proposed in this rule would continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee would continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's budget for subsequent
fiscal years would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 1,100 producers of olives in the production
area and two handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts
are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based upon National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
information as of June 2018, the average price to producers for the
2017 crop year was $974.00 per ton, and total assessable volume for the
2018 crop year was 17,953 tons. Based on production, price paid to
producers, and the total number of California olive producers, the
average annual producer revenue is less than $750,000 ($974.00 times
17,953 tons equals $17,486,222 divided by 1,100 producers equals an
average annual producer revenue of $15,896.57). Thus, the majority of
olive producers may be classified as small entities. Both of the
handlers may be classified as large entities under the SBA's
definitions because their annual receipts are greater than $7,500,000.
This proposal would increase the assessment rate collected from
handlers for the 2019 and subsequent fiscal years from $24.00 to $44.00
per ton of assessable olives. The Committee unanimously recommended
2019 expenditures of $1,628,923 and an assessment rate of $44.00 per
ton of assessable olives. The recommended assessment rate of $44.00 is
$20.00 higher than the 2018 rate. The quantity of assessable olives for
the 2019 Fiscal year is 17,953 tons. Thus, the $44.00 rate should
provide $789,932 in assessment revenue. The higher assessment rate is
needed because annual receipts for the 2018 crop year are 17,953 tons
compared to 90,188 tons for the 2017 crop year. Olives are an
alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop followed by a large crop.
Income derived from the $44.00 per ton assessment rate, along with
funds from the authorized reserve and interest income, should be
adequate to meet this fiscal year's expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2019
fiscal year include $713,900 for program administration, $513,500 for
marketing activities, $343,523 for research, and $58,000 for inspection
equipment. Budgeted expenses for these items during the 2018 fiscal
year were $401,200 for program administration, $973,500 for marketing
activities, $297,777 for research, and $77,000 for inspection
equipment. The Committee deliberated on many of the expenses, weighed
the relative value of various programs or projects, and increased their
expenses for marketing and research activities.
Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate, the Committee
considered information from various sources including the Committee's
Executive, Marketing, Inspection, and Research Subcommittees. Alternate
expenditure levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the
relative value of various projects to the olive industry and the
increased olive production. The assessment rate of $44.00 per ton of
assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated expenses, the
low volume of assessable olives, a late season freeze, and additional
pertinent factors.
A review of NASS information indicates that the average producer
price for the 2017 crop year was $974.00 per ton. Therefore, utilizing
the assessment rate of $44.00 per ton, the assessment revenue for the
2019 fiscal year as a percentage of total producer revenue would be
approximately 4.52 percent.
This proposed action would increase the assessment obligation
imposed on handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on
handlers, the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs
[[Page 17091]]
may be passed on to producers. However, these costs would be offset by
the benefits derived by the operation of the Order. In addition, the
Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the production
area. The olive industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all
issues. Like all Committee meetings, the December 11, 2018, meeting was
a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to
express views on this issue. Interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and
information collection impacts of this action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 Vegetable
Crops. No changes in those requirements as a result of this action are
necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted
to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California olive
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this action.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. All written comments timely received
will be considered before a final determination is made on this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 932--OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 932.230 Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2019, an assessment rate of $44.00 per ton
is established for California olives.
Dated: April 18, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-08179 Filed 4-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P