Submission for OMB Review; National and Tribal Evaluation of the 2nd Generation of the Health Profession Opportunity Grants (OMB #0970-0462), 16870-16872 [2019-08163]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
16870
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Notices
through quarterly cluster report forms
that will be completed by health
departments for clusters that they have
identified and for which they are
actively conducting response activities.
Health departments will complete an
initial cluster report form when a cluster
is first identified, a cluster follow-up
form for each quarter in which the
cluster response remains active and a
cluster close-out form when cluster
response activities are closed or at
annual intervals while a cluster
response remains active. Completion of
forms will be determined by the number
of clusters detected. Health departments
that do not identify recent and rapid
clusters of HIV transmission will not
complete any cluster report forms, while
some jurisdictions will detect multiple
recent and rapid clusters of HIV
transmission, necessitating the
completion of multiple cluster report
forms. CDC estimates on average health
departments will provide information
for 2.5 cluster initial cluster reports, five
Cluster Follow-up Form reports, and 2.5
Cluster Close-out Form reports
annually.
Perinatal HIV surveillance and
prevention activities with HIV exposure
reporting and perinatal services
coordination is an integrated approach
to advancing the progress toward
perinatal HIV elimination goals. A
subset of 16 health departments in the
most affected jurisdictions will be
reporting using the Perinatal Exposure
Reporting (PHER) form to monitor and
evaluate perinatal HIV prevention
efforts. An estimated 197 reports
containing perinatal exposure data
elements will be processed on average
annually by each of the 16 health
departments reporting data collected as
part of PHER. These supplemental data
are also reported monthly to CDC.
The Standards Evaluation Report
(SER) is used by CDC and Health
Departments to improve data quality,
interpretation, usefulness, and
surveillance system efficiency, as well
as to monitor progress toward meeting
surveillance program objectives. The
information collected for the SER
includes a brief set of questions about
evaluation outcomes and the collection
of laboratory data that will be reported
one time a year by each 59 health
departments.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Departments
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
(in hours)
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
Adult HIV Case Report ........................................
Pediatric HIV Case Report ..................................
Case Report Evaluations .....................................
Case Report Updates ..........................................
Laboratory Updates .............................................
Deduplication Activities ........................................
Investigation Reporting and Evaluation ...............
Initial Cluster Report Form ...................................
Cluster Follow-up Form .......................................
Cluster Close-out Form ........................................
Perinatal HIV Exposure Reporting (PHER) .........
Annual Reporting: Standards Evaluation Report
(SER).
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
16
59
854
3
86
2,353
9,410
2,741
901
2.5
5
2.5
197
1
20/60
20/60
20/60
2/60
0.5/60
10/60
1/60
1
30/60
1
30/60
8
16,795
59
1,691
4,627
4,627
26,953
886
148
148
148
1,576
472
Total .......................
..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
58,129
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019–08152 Filed 4–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review; National
and Tribal Evaluation of the 2nd
Generation of the Health Profession
Opportunity Grants (OMB #0970–0462)
Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, Administration for
Children and Families, HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Number of
respondents
Form name
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), U.S.
Department of Health and Human
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
Services (HHS) is proposing data
collection activities as part of the Health
Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG)
to Serve TANF Recipients and Other
Low Income Individuals. ACF has
developed a multi-pronged research and
evaluation approach for the HPOG
Program to better understand and assess
the activities conducted and their
results. Two rounds of HPOG grants
have been awarded—the first in 2010
(HPOG 1.0) and the second in 2015
(HPOG 2.0). There are federal
evaluations associated with each round
of grants. HPOG grants provide funding
to government agencies, communitybased organizations, post-secondary
educational institutions, and tribalaffiliated organizations to provide
education and training services to
Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF) recipients and other
low-income individuals, including
tribal members. Under HPOG 2.0, ACF
provided grants to five tribal-affiliated
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
organizations and 27 non-tribal entities.
OMB previously approved data
collection under OMB Control Number
0970–0462 for the HPOG 2.0 National
and Tribal Evaluation. The first
submission, approved in August 2015,
included baseline data collection
instruments and the grant performance
management system. A second
submission, approved in June 2017,
included additional data collection for
the National Evaluation impact study,
the National Evaluation descriptive
study, and the Tribal Evaluation. A
third submission for National
Evaluation impact study data collection
was approved in June 2018. The
proposed data collection activities
described in this Federal Register
Notice will provide data for the impact,
descriptive, and cost benefit studies of
the 27 non-tribal grantees participating
in the National Evaluation of HPOG 2.0.
Comments due within 30 days of
publication. OMB is required to make a
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
16871
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Notices
decision concerning the collection of
information between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget Paperwork
Reduction Project Email: OIRA_
SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV Attn:
Desk Officer for the Administration for
Children and Families.
Copies of the proposed collection may
be obtained by emailing
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
Alternatively, copies can also be
obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE
Reports Clearance Officer. All requests,
emailed or written, should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The HPOG 2.0 National
Evaluation pertains only to the 27 nontribal grantees that received HPOG 2.0
funding. The design for the National
Evaluation features an impact study, a
descriptive study, and a cost benefit
study. The National Evaluation is using
an experimental design to measure and
analyze key participant outcomes
including completion of education and
training, receipt of certificates and/or
degrees, earnings, and employment in a
healthcare career. The impact
evaluation will assess the outcomes for
study participants that were offered
HPOG 2.0 training, financial assistance,
and support services, compared to
outcomes for a control group that were
not offered HPOG 2.0 services. ACF and
the study team estimates that the nontribal grantees will randomize about
40,000 applicants. As detailed in the
burden estimates below, the study team
will only survey a subset of those
randomized. The goal of the descriptive
study is to describe and assess the
implementation, systems change,
outcomes, and other important
information about the operations of the
27 non-tribal HPOG grantees, which are
operating 38 distinct programs. To
achieve these goals, it is necessary to
collect data about the non-tribal HPOG
programs’ design and implementation,
HPOG partner and program networks,
the composition and intensity of HPOG
services received by participants,
participant characteristics and HPOG
experiences, and participant outputs
and outcomes. The cost benefit study
will estimate the costs of providing the
HPOG 2.0 programs and compare the
costs with gains in participant
employment and earnings measured in
the impact analysis. To achieve this
goal, it is necessary to collect
information from the 38 HPOG 2.0
programs on the cost of providing
education and training and associated
services. This Notice provides the
opportunity to comment on proposed
new information collection activities for
the HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation’s
impact, descriptive, and cost-benefit
studies.
The information collection activities
to be submitted in the request package
include:
1. Screening Interview to identify
respondents for the HPOG 2.0 National
Evaluation descriptive study secondround telephone interviews.
2. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation
descriptive study second-round
telephone interview guide for program
management, staff, partners, and
stakeholders. These interviews will
confirm or update information collected
in a first round of calls, approved in
June 2017. The second round interviews
will update or confirm any new
information about the HPOG program
context and about program
administration, activities and services,
partner and stakeholder roles and
networks, and respondent perceptions
of the program’s strengths.
3. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation
descriptive study program operator
interview guide will collect information
for the systems study from HPOG 2.0
programs operators. These interviews
will collect information on how local
service delivery systems (i.e., the
economic and service delivery
environment in which specific HPOG
2.0 programs operate) may have
influenced HPOG program design and
implementation and how HPOG 2.0
implementation may have influenced
these local systems.
4. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation
descriptive study partner interview
guide will collect information for the
systems study from HPOG 2.0 partner
organizations.
5. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation
descriptive study participant in-depth
interview guide will collect qualitative
information about the experiences of
treatment group members participating
in HPOG 2.0 program services.
6. Intermediate Follow-up Survey for
the HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation
impact study will collect information
from both treatment and control group
members at the 27 non-tribal grantees,
approximately 36 months after baseline
data collection and random assignment.
(Instrument 18_HPOG 2.0 Intermediate
Follow-up Survey_10172018_
FINAL.doc)
7. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation
impact study instrument for a Pilot
Study of Phone-Based Skills Assessment
will collect information from HPOG 2.0
study participants in a subset of nontribal grantee programs. The phonebased questionnaire will pilot an
assessment of respondents’ literacy and
numeracy skills to inform the selection
of survey questions for inclusion in the
intermediate follow-up survey.
8. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation
Program Cost Survey will collect
information from program staff at the 27
non-tribal grantees to support the costbenefit study.
At this time, the Department does not
foresee the need for any subsequent
requests for clearance for the HPOG 2.0
National and Tribal Evaluations.
Respondents: HPOG impact study
participants from the 27 non-tribal
HPOG 2.0 grantees (treatment and
control group); HPOG program
managers; HPOG program staff; and
representatives of partner agencies and
stakeholders, including support service
providers, educational and vocational
training partners, Workforce Investment
Boards, and TANF agencies.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Total number
of respondents
Instrument
Screening interview to identify respondents for the HPOG
2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study second-round
telephone interviews .........................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Annual
number of
respondents
38
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
13
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
1
23APN1
Average
burden
hours per
response
Annual burden
hours
.5
7
16872
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Notices
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES—Continued
Total number
of respondents
Instrument
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study second
round telephone interview protocol ..................................
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study program
operator interview guide ...................................................
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study partner
interview guide .................................................................
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study participant in-depth interview guide ...........................................
Intermediate follow-up survey for the HPOG 2.0 National
Evaluation impact study ...................................................
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation impact study instrument for
a Pilot Study of Phone-Based Skills Assessment ...........
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation program cost survey ..........
Number of
responses per
respondent
Authority: Section 2008 of the Social
Security Act as enacted by Section 5507 of
the Affordable Care Act.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–08163 Filed 4–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–72–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Submission for OMB Review; State
Access and Visitation Grant
Application (OMB #0970–0482)
Office of Child Support
Enforcement, Administration for
Children and Families, HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The Office of Child Support
Enforcement is requesting a three-year
Annual burden
hours
63
1
1.25
79
16
5
1
1.25
6
112
37
1
1
37
140
47
1
1.33
63
4,000
1,333
1
1
1,333
300
38
100
13
1
1
.75
7
75
91
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Email: OIRA_
SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV, Attn:
Desk Officer for the Administration for
Children and Families.
Copies of the proposed collection may
be obtained by emailing infocollection@
acf.hhs.gov. Alternatively, copies can
also be obtained by writing to the
ADDRESSES:
Administration for Children and
Families
Average
burden
hours per
response
190
extension of the application form titled,
Child Access and Visitation Grant
Application Form, expiration 8/31/
2019. There are no changes requested to
the form.
DATES: Comments due within 30 days of
publication. OMB is required to make a
decision concerning the collection of
information between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,691.
SUMMARY:
Annual
number of
respondents
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE
Reports Clearance Officer. All requests,
emailed or written, should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The application compiles
detailed information regarding program
administration, services planned, state
priorities, and program safeguards for
using grant funds to increase
noncustodial parent access to and
visitation with their children. This
information allows OCSE to review
states’ Access and Visitation services for
the purpose of ensuring compliance
with federal regulation and to provide
enhanced targeted technical assistance
as indicated. The application is
submitted one time at the beginning of
a three year grant program cycle and
only updated during the three years if
a grantee proposes substantive
programmatic or administrative change.
Respondents: State Governments.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Instrument
Total
number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total
burden hours
Annual
burden hours
Child Access and Visitation Grant Application Form ...........
54
1
10
540
180
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 180.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Authority: Sec. 469B. [42 U.S.C.669b].
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–08109 Filed 4–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–41–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act
(BPCA) Priority List of Needs in
Pediatric Therapeutics
AGENCY:
National Institutes of Health,
HHS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
The National Institutes of
Health (NIH), Eunice Kennedy Shriver
National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development (NICHD) hereby
announces the renewal of the Best
Pharmaceuticals for Children Act
(BPCA) Program. The Best
Pharmaceuticals for Children Act
(BPCA) seeks to improve the level of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16870-16872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08163]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Submission for OMB Review; National and Tribal Evaluation of the
2nd Generation of the Health Profession Opportunity Grants (OMB #0970-
0462)
AGENCY: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration
for Children and Families, HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is proposing data
collection activities as part of the Health Profession Opportunity
Grants (HPOG) to Serve TANF Recipients and Other Low Income
Individuals. ACF has developed a multi-pronged research and evaluation
approach for the HPOG Program to better understand and assess the
activities conducted and their results. Two rounds of HPOG grants have
been awarded--the first in 2010 (HPOG 1.0) and the second in 2015 (HPOG
2.0). There are federal evaluations associated with each round of
grants. HPOG grants provide funding to government agencies, community-
based organizations, post-secondary educational institutions, and
tribal-affiliated organizations to provide education and training
services to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients
and other low-income individuals, including tribal members. Under HPOG
2.0, ACF provided grants to five tribal-affiliated organizations and 27
non-tribal entities. OMB previously approved data collection under OMB
Control Number 0970-0462 for the HPOG 2.0 National and Tribal
Evaluation. The first submission, approved in August 2015, included
baseline data collection instruments and the grant performance
management system. A second submission, approved in June 2017, included
additional data collection for the National Evaluation impact study,
the National Evaluation descriptive study, and the Tribal Evaluation. A
third submission for National Evaluation impact study data collection
was approved in June 2018. The proposed data collection activities
described in this Federal Register Notice will provide data for the
impact, descriptive, and cost benefit studies of the 27 non-tribal
grantees participating in the National Evaluation of HPOG 2.0.
DATES: Comments due within 30 days of publication. OMB is required to
make a
[[Page 16871]]
decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60
days after publication of this document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget Paperwork Reduction Project Email:
[email protected] Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration
for Children and Families.
Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by emailing
[email protected]. Alternatively, copies can also be
obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families,
Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. All
requests, emailed or written, should be identified by the title of the
information collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation pertains only to the
27 non-tribal grantees that received HPOG 2.0 funding. The design for
the National Evaluation features an impact study, a descriptive study,
and a cost benefit study. The National Evaluation is using an
experimental design to measure and analyze key participant outcomes
including completion of education and training, receipt of certificates
and/or degrees, earnings, and employment in a healthcare career. The
impact evaluation will assess the outcomes for study participants that
were offered HPOG 2.0 training, financial assistance, and support
services, compared to outcomes for a control group that were not
offered HPOG 2.0 services. ACF and the study team estimates that the
non-tribal grantees will randomize about 40,000 applicants. As detailed
in the burden estimates below, the study team will only survey a subset
of those randomized. The goal of the descriptive study is to describe
and assess the implementation, systems change, outcomes, and other
important information about the operations of the 27 non-tribal HPOG
grantees, which are operating 38 distinct programs. To achieve these
goals, it is necessary to collect data about the non-tribal HPOG
programs' design and implementation, HPOG partner and program networks,
the composition and intensity of HPOG services received by
participants, participant characteristics and HPOG experiences, and
participant outputs and outcomes. The cost benefit study will estimate
the costs of providing the HPOG 2.0 programs and compare the costs with
gains in participant employment and earnings measured in the impact
analysis. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to collect information
from the 38 HPOG 2.0 programs on the cost of providing education and
training and associated services. This Notice provides the opportunity
to comment on proposed new information collection activities for the
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation's impact, descriptive, and cost-benefit
studies.
The information collection activities to be submitted in the
request package include:
1. Screening Interview to identify respondents for the HPOG 2.0
National Evaluation descriptive study second-round telephone
interviews.
2. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study second-round
telephone interview guide for program management, staff, partners, and
stakeholders. These interviews will confirm or update information
collected in a first round of calls, approved in June 2017. The second
round interviews will update or confirm any new information about the
HPOG program context and about program administration, activities and
services, partner and stakeholder roles and networks, and respondent
perceptions of the program's strengths.
3. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study program operator
interview guide will collect information for the systems study from
HPOG 2.0 programs operators. These interviews will collect information
on how local service delivery systems (i.e., the economic and service
delivery environment in which specific HPOG 2.0 programs operate) may
have influenced HPOG program design and implementation and how HPOG 2.0
implementation may have influenced these local systems.
4. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study partner interview
guide will collect information for the systems study from HPOG 2.0
partner organizations.
5. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation descriptive study participant in-
depth interview guide will collect qualitative information about the
experiences of treatment group members participating in HPOG 2.0
program services.
6. Intermediate Follow-up Survey for the HPOG 2.0 National
Evaluation impact study will collect information from both treatment
and control group members at the 27 non-tribal grantees, approximately
36 months after baseline data collection and random assignment.
(Instrument 18_HPOG 2.0 Intermediate Follow-up
Survey_10172018_FINAL.doc)
7. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation impact study instrument for a Pilot
Study of Phone-Based Skills Assessment will collect information from
HPOG 2.0 study participants in a subset of non-tribal grantee programs.
The phone-based questionnaire will pilot an assessment of respondents'
literacy and numeracy skills to inform the selection of survey
questions for inclusion in the intermediate follow-up survey.
8. HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation Program Cost Survey will collect
information from program staff at the 27 non-tribal grantees to support
the cost-benefit study.
At this time, the Department does not foresee the need for any
subsequent requests for clearance for the HPOG 2.0 National and Tribal
Evaluations.
Respondents: HPOG impact study participants from the 27 non-tribal
HPOG 2.0 grantees (treatment and control group); HPOG program managers;
HPOG program staff; and representatives of partner agencies and
stakeholders, including support service providers, educational and
vocational training partners, Workforce Investment Boards, and TANF
agencies.
Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual number Number of Average
Instrument Total number of responses per burden hours Annual burden
of respondents respondents respondent per response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Screening interview to identify 38 13 1 .5 7
respondents for the HPOG 2.0
National Evaluation descriptive
study second-round telephone
interviews.....................
[[Page 16872]]
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation 190 63 1 1.25 79
descriptive study second round
telephone interview protocol...
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation 16 5 1 1.25 6
descriptive study program
operator interview guide.......
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation 112 37 1 1 37
descriptive study partner
interview guide................
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation 140 47 1 1.33 63
descriptive study participant
in-depth interview guide.......
Intermediate follow-up survey 4,000 1,333 1 1 1,333
for the HPOG 2.0 National
Evaluation impact study........
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation 300 100 1 .75 75
impact study instrument for a
Pilot Study of Phone-Based
Skills Assessment..............
HPOG 2.0 National Evaluation 38 13 1 7 91
program cost survey............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,691.
Authority: Section 2008 of the Social Security Act as enacted by
Section 5507 of the Affordable Care Act.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019-08163 Filed 4-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-72-P
