Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore Harbor, Baltimore, MD, 16778-16781 [2019-08116]
Download as PDF
16778
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Docket No.
Type
Location
USCG–2018–0818 ................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
USCG–2018–0914 ................
Security Zones (Part 165) ................................
USCG–2018–1113 ................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
USCG–2018–1112
USCG–2018–1086
USCG–2019–0008
USCG–2019–0021
................
................
................
................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Security Zones (Part 165) ................................
USCG–2018–1059 ................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
USCG–2018–1111 ................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
USCG–2018–1116 ................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
USCG–2019–0026
USCG–2019–0006
USCG–2018–1115
USCG–2019–0007
................
................
................
................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Drawbridges (Part 117) ....................................
Special Local Regulations (Part 100) ...............
USCG–2018–1120
USCG–2019–0027
USCG–2018–1109
USCG–2019–0204
USCG–2019–0173
................
................
................
................
................
Special Local Regulations (Part 100) ...............
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ...................
Security Zones (Part 165) ................................
Sunken Vessel Charleston Harbor; Charleston,
SC.
Potomac River and Anacostia River, Washington, DC.
Downtown Sandusky Fireworks, Lake Erie,
Sandusky, OH.
Ohio River, Vanport, PA ...................................
Tennessee River, Huntsville, AL ......................
Tennessee River, Huntsville, AL ......................
Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi,
TX.
Tappan Zee Bridge Demolition, Hudson River;
Tarrytown, NY.
Fireworks Displays in the Fifth Coast Guard
District.
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Camp Lejeune,
NC.
Tennessee River, Calvert City, KY ...................
Ohio River, Owensboro, KY .............................
Newport River, Beaufort, NC ............................
Gasparilla Marine Parade; Hillsborough Bay;
Tampa, FL.
Hanohano Ocean Challenge, San Diego, CA ..
Pier 84; Fireworks Display in the COTP, NY ...
Murden Cove, Bainbridge Island, WA ..............
Squalicum Harbor, WA .....................................
Charleston Harbor and Cooper River, Charleston, SC.
Dated: April 18, 2019.
Katia Kroutil,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
environment by accurately depicting the
anchorage locations. The changes to the
regulated uses of the anchorages will
support current and future port activity
related to the safety of post-Panamax
commercial cargo vessels, and will
remove vessel security provisions that
currently exist in these Baltimore
Harbor regulations.
[FR Doc. 2019–08120 Filed 4–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DATES:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0181 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
ADDRESSES:
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0181]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore
Harbor, Baltimore, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is amending
its Baltimore Harbor anchorage grounds
regulation. The changes will reduce the
size of three general anchorages,
establish one new general anchorage,
rename two existing general anchorages,
and change the duration a vessel may
remain within an anchorage for two
existing general anchorages. This rule
will ensure that Coast Guard regulations
are consistent with the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Baltimore District Port of
Baltimore Anchorages and Channels
civil works project that widened the
channel, and provide a higher degree of
safety to persons, property and the
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
16:20 Apr 22, 2019
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, U.S. Coast
Guard, Sector Maryland-National
Capital Region, Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone (410)
576–2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
This rule is effective May 23,
2019.
Coast Guard
Jkt 247001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Effective date
11/18/18
12/3/18
12/31/18
1/1/19
1/4/19
1/9/19
1/12/19
1/12/19
1/13/19
1/15/19
1/16/19
1/19/19
1/25/19
1/26/19
1/26/19
2/11/19
2/26/19
3/16/19
3/19/19
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Anchorage regulation duties and
powers were transferred to the Coast
Guard in 1967 (32 FR 17726, Dec. 12,
1967). On December 12, 1968, the Fifth
Coast Guard District published a final
rule in the Federal Register (33 FR
18438) establishing an anchorage area in
Baltimore Harbor, Maryland. The
anchorage grounds at Baltimore,
Maryland are described in 33 CFR
110.158. These anchorage grounds are
involved in a federal navigation project
under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Baltimore District.
Section 101a(22) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–
53, 113 Stat 269 (1999)) authorized
widening of the Dundalk and Seagirt
Marine Terminal channels. Widening of
the Seagirt Marine Terminal channel
occurred in 2015. This dredging
widened the limits of existing
navigation channels which are used to
access key Maryland Port
Administration marine terminals
located immediately adjacent to the
Baltimore Harbor, Maryland anchorage
grounds, and put the existing anchorage
grounds in the way of the newly
expanded navigation channels. To
addresses these changes, Sector
Maryland-National Capital Region,
Baltimore, Maryland, worked in
coordination with the Port of Baltimore
Harbor Safety and Coordination
Committee to develop proposed
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
revisions to the affected anchorage
boundaries and associated regulations.
On August 14, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled ‘‘Anchorage
Grounds; Baltimore Harbor, Baltimore,
MD’’ (83 FR 40164). There we stated
why we issued the NPRM, and invited
comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to this anchorage grounds.
During the comment period that ended
November 13, 2018, we received no
comments.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071;
46 U.S.C 70034; 33 CFR 1.05–1; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define anchorage grounds. The
purpose of this rule is to reduce
navigational safety risk and support port
efficiency in Baltimore Harbor. This
regulation will designate a new general
anchorage ground developed from an
existing anchorage ground that is
located outside of the established
navigation channel in order to align
with the existing U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Baltimore District Port of
Baltimore Anchorages and Channels
civil works project. The Baltimore
Harbor anchorage grounds are typically
used by deep draft commercial cargo
vessels. In order to maximize the
availability and use of these important
anchorages, this regulation will also
change the duration for which vessels
may remain in these anchorages. This
regulation will reduce the duration a
vessel may remain within Anchorage
No. 3 Lower (renumbered as Anchorage
No. 3A) and Anchorage No. 4, from 72
hours to 24 hours. Lastly, due to similar
provisions within the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002
(MTSA) (Pub. L. 107–295) and federal
regulations (33 CFR part 104, and 46
CFR chapter 1, subchapters N and O),
the vessel security requirements in
§ 110.158(d) are now redundant and
will be removed as part of this
regulation.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published
August 14, 2018. There are no changes
in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule amends the Baltimore
Harbor, Maryland anchorage grounds as
described in 33 CFR 110.158. The
general anchorages currently listed in
the regulation that are affected by this
rule are Anchorage No. 2, Anchorage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Apr 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
No. 3 Upper, Anchorage No. 3 Lower,
Anchorage No. 4, Anchorage No. 5 and
Anchorage No. 6.
This rule reduces the sizes of
Anchorage No. 2, Anchorage No. 3
Lower, and Anchorage No. 4. These
reductions will remove the portions of
the anchorage grounds that are in the
navigable channel. The area of
Anchorage No. 2 is reduced by
approximately 16,330 square yards
along its northern limit and
approximately 326,770 square yards
along its eastern limit. The area of
Anchorage No. 3 Lower is reduced at its
eastern limit by 12,560 square yards.
The area of Anchorage No. 4 is reduced
at its western limit by 6,000 square
yards.
This rule renames Anchorage No. 3
Lower to Anchorage No. 3A, and
renames Anchorage No. 3 Upper to
Anchorage No. 3B. This rule revises
Anchorage No. 2 and creates an area
called Anchorage No. 3C out of existing
anchorage ground from Anchorage No.
2. An area within Anchorage No. 2 that
is approximately 500 yards in length
and 165 yards in width, and adjacent to
Anchorage No. 3 Upper, becomes
Anchorage No. 3C. This reconfiguration
does not provide new space available
for anchorage, will not restrict traffic,
and is located outside of the established
navigation channel. A graphic depicting
these changes is included in the docket.
This rule will reduce the duration a
vessel may remain within Anchorage
No. 3 Lower (renumbered as Anchorage
No. 3A) and Anchorage No. 4, from 72
hours to 24 hours. These changes are
based on recommendations documented
by the Port of Baltimore Harbor Safety
and Coordination Committee on
September 8, 2010, and the Association
of Maryland Pilots. The Port of
Baltimore Harbor Safety and
Coordination Committee’s
recommendation is available in the
docket. The Coast Guard agrees that the
Committee’s recommendation addresses
the problem of ensuring maximum
availability and use of these anchorages.
In addition, this rule establishes that a
vessel may remain within Anchorage
No. 3C for no more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port, to remain consistent with the
regulations for Anchorage No. 2.
This rulemaking renumbers several
paragraphs listed in 33 CFR 110.158,
from (a)(3) Anchorage No. 3, Upper,
general anchorage, through (a)(8)
Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage.
All anchorage ground descriptions will
be updated to state they are in the
waters of the Patapsco River, except for
Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage,
which will be updated to state it is in
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16779
the waters of Curtis Bay. Designation of
the new Anchorage No. 3C will create
a new paragraph, (a)(9) for Anchorage
No. 7, Dead ship anchorage. This
rulemaking modifies paragraph (c)(3) of
the general regulations to remove the
reference to a vessel becoming ‘‘a
menace’’ because we do not define that
term and we don’t believe it is needed
given other factors already included in
that paragraph. We also change the
defined term ‘‘dangerous cargo’’ to
‘‘certain dangerous cargo’’ without
changing the definition, continuing to
incorporate the definition of certain
dangerous cargo from 33 CFR 160.202,
and aligning terminology used in this
rule with that used throughout the rest
of 33 CFR 110.158. This rulemaking
removes paragraphs (c)(4) regarding
revocable permits for habitual use of an
anchorage, and paragraph (d) in its
entirety, as described in section III
above.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the following: (i) It will not
interfere with existing maritime activity
in Baltimore Harbor, (ii) the changes
will reduce navigational safety risk in
Baltimore Harbor by: (1) Aligning
existing general anchorage boundaries
with recent dredging projects that
widened the limits of adjacent
navigational channels, (2) reducing the
duration a vessel may remain within an
anchorage to increase availability and
usage, and (3) renaming and
reconfiguring general anchorages that
support a proper naming and numbering
convention within the existing
anchorage regulation, and (iii) the
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
16780
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
reconfiguration of the additional general
anchorage does not provide additional
anchorage area and will not restrict
traffic, as it is developed from an
existing anchorage and is located
outside of the established navigation
channel. As discussed in section IV
above, this rule will replace the
‘‘dangerous cargo’’ definition with one
for ‘‘certain dangerous cargo’’ and
remove vessel security provisions that
are redundant to other federal
regulations.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in section V.A
above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Apr 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
modification of existing anchorages
within the Baltimore Harbor, Maryland
anchorage grounds. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
paragraph L59(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 01. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071; 46 U.S.C.
70034; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 110.158 to read as follows:
§ 110.158
Baltimore Harbor, MD.
(a) Anchorage Grounds—(1) No. 1,
general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
Latitude
39°15′13.51″
39°15′11.01″
39°14′52.98″
39°14′47.90″
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°34′07.76″
76°34′11.69″
76°33′52.67″
76°33′40.73″
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 12 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(2) Anchorage No. 2, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′50.06″
39°14′57.53″
39°15′08.56″
39°15′15.77″
39°15′18.87″
39°15′17.71″
39°14′50.35″
39°14′45.28″
39°14′46.27″
39°14′43.76″
39°14′57.51″
39°14′55.60″
39°14′59.42″
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°33′29.86″
76°33′37.74″
76°33′37.66″
76°33′28.81″
76°33′12.82″
76°33′09.09″
76°32′40.43″
76°32′48.68″
76°32′49.69″
76°32′53.63″
76°33′08.14″
76°33′11.14″
76°33′15.17″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(3) Anchorage No. 3A, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(8) Anchorage No. 6, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′15.66″
39°14′32.48″
39°14′46.27″
39°14′32.50″
39°14′22.37″
Latitude
39°13′42.98″
39°13′20.65″
39°13′34.00″
39°14′01.95″
39°13′51.01″
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°32′53.59″
76°33′11.31″
76°32′49.69″
76°32′35.18″
76°32′43.07″
W
W
W
W
W
Longitude
76°32′19.11″
76°31′55.58″
76°31′33.50″
76°32′02.65″
76°32′18.71″
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 24 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(4) Anchorage No. 3B, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(9) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship
anchorage. (i) All waters of Curtis Bay,
bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′32.48″
39°14′46.23″
39°14′57.51″
39°14′43.76″
Latitude
39°13′00.40″
39°13′13.40″
39°13′13.96″
39°13′14.83″
39°13′00.40″
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°33′11.31″
76°33′25.83″
76°33′08.14″
76°32′53.63″
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 24 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(5) Anchorage No. 3C, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′46.23″
39°14′50.06″
39°14′59.42″
39°14′55.60″
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°33′25.83″
76°33′29.86″
76°33′15.17″
76°33′11.14″
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(6) Anchorage No. 4, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°13′52.92″
39°14′04.38″
39°14′09.35″
39°14′17.96″
39°14′05.32″
39°14′00.05″
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°32′29.60″
76°32′41.69″
76°32′39.89″
76°32′26.44″
76°32′13.09″
76°32′17.77″
W
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 24 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(7) Anchorage No. 5, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
N
N
N
N
N
Latitude
39°14′07.89″
39°13′34.82″
39°13′22.25″
39°13′21.20″
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°32′58.23″
76°32′23.66″
76°32′28.90″
76°33′11.94″
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Apr 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°34′10.40″
76°34′10.81″
76°34′05.02″
76°33′29.80″
76°33′29.90″
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) The primary use of this anchorage
is to lay up dead ships. Such use has
priority over other uses. Permission
from the Captain of the Port must be
obtained prior to the use of this
anchorage for more than 72 hours.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Certain dangerous cargo means
certain dangerous cargo as defined in
§ 160.202 of this chapter.
COTP means Captain of the Port
Sector Maryland—National Capital
Region.
(c) General regulations. (1) Except as
otherwise provided, this section applies
to vessels over 20 meters long and all
vessels carrying or handling certain
dangerous cargo while anchored in an
anchorage ground described in this
section.
(2) Except in cases where unforeseen
circumstances create conditions of
imminent peril, or with the permission
of the Captain of the Port, no vessel
shall be anchored in Baltimore Harbor
or the Patapsco River outside of the
anchorage areas established in this
section for more than 24 hours. No
vessel shall anchor within a tunnel,
cable or pipeline area shown on a
government chart. No vessel shall be
moored, anchored, or tied up to any
pier, wharf, or other vessel in such
manner as to extend into established
channel limits. No vessel shall be
positioned so as to obstruct or endanger
the passage of any other vessel.
(3) Except in an emergency, a vessel
that is likely to sink or otherwise
become an obstruction to navigation or
the anchoring of other vessels may not
occupy an anchorage, unless the vessel
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16781
obtains permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(4) Upon notification by the Captain
of the Port to shift its position, a vessel
at anchor must get underway and shall
move to its new designated position
within two hours after notification.
(5) The Captain of the Port may
prescribe specific conditions for vessels
anchoring within the anchorages
described in this section, including, but
not limited to, the number and location
of anchors, scope of chain, readiness of
engineering plant and equipment, usage
of tugs, and requirements for
maintaining communication guards on
selected radio frequencies.
(6) No vessel at anchor or at a mooring
within an anchorage may transfer oil to
or from another vessel unless the vessel
has given the Captain of the Port the
four hours advance notice required by
§ 156.118 of this chapter.
(7) No vessel shall anchor in a ‘‘dead
ship’’ status (propulsion or control
unavailable for normal operations)
without prior approval of the Captain of
the Port.
Dated: April 17, 2019.
Keith M. Smith,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019–08116 Filed 4–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2019–0241]
Safety Zones; Fireworks Displays in
the Fifth Coast Guard District
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the Penn’s Landing, Delaware River,
Philadelphia, PA, safety zone from 8:30
p.m. through 9:00 p.m. on April 26,
2019. This action is necessary to ensure
safety of life on the navigable waters of
the United States immediately prior to,
during, and immediately after the
fireworks displays. Our regulation for
safety zones of fireworks displays in the
Fifth Coast Guard District identifies the
regulated area for this event at Penn’s
Landing in Philadelphia, PA. During the
enforcement periods, vessels may not
enter, remain in, or transit through the
safety zones during these enforcement
periods unless authorized by the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16778-16781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08116]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0181]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore Harbor, Baltimore, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending its Baltimore Harbor anchorage
grounds regulation. The changes will reduce the size of three general
anchorages, establish one new general anchorage, rename two existing
general anchorages, and change the duration a vessel may remain within
an anchorage for two existing general anchorages. This rule will ensure
that Coast Guard regulations are consistent with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Baltimore District Port of Baltimore Anchorages and Channels
civil works project that widened the channel, and provide a higher
degree of safety to persons, property and the environment by accurately
depicting the anchorage locations. The changes to the regulated uses of
the anchorages will support current and future port activity related to
the safety of post-Panamax commercial cargo vessels, and will remove
vessel security provisions that currently exist in these Baltimore
Harbor regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective May 23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0181 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Maryland-
National Capital Region, Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (410) 576-2674, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
Anchorage regulation duties and powers were transferred to the
Coast Guard in 1967 (32 FR 17726, Dec. 12, 1967). On December 12, 1968,
the Fifth Coast Guard District published a final rule in the Federal
Register (33 FR 18438) establishing an anchorage area in Baltimore
Harbor, Maryland. The anchorage grounds at Baltimore, Maryland are
described in 33 CFR 110.158. These anchorage grounds are involved in a
federal navigation project under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Section 101a(22) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106-53, 113 Stat 269 (1999))
authorized widening of the Dundalk and Seagirt Marine Terminal
channels. Widening of the Seagirt Marine Terminal channel occurred in
2015. This dredging widened the limits of existing navigation channels
which are used to access key Maryland Port Administration marine
terminals located immediately adjacent to the Baltimore Harbor,
Maryland anchorage grounds, and put the existing anchorage grounds in
the way of the newly expanded navigation channels. To addresses these
changes, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region, Baltimore, Maryland,
worked in coordination with the Port of Baltimore Harbor Safety and
Coordination Committee to develop proposed
[[Page 16779]]
revisions to the affected anchorage boundaries and associated
regulations. On August 14, 2018, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore
Harbor, Baltimore, MD'' (83 FR 40164). There we stated why we issued
the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action
related to this anchorage grounds. During the comment period that ended
November 13, 2018, we received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
471, 2071; 46 U.S.C 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast
Guard to define anchorage grounds. The purpose of this rule is to
reduce navigational safety risk and support port efficiency in
Baltimore Harbor. This regulation will designate a new general
anchorage ground developed from an existing anchorage ground that is
located outside of the established navigation channel in order to align
with the existing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District Port
of Baltimore Anchorages and Channels civil works project. The Baltimore
Harbor anchorage grounds are typically used by deep draft commercial
cargo vessels. In order to maximize the availability and use of these
important anchorages, this regulation will also change the duration for
which vessels may remain in these anchorages. This regulation will
reduce the duration a vessel may remain within Anchorage No. 3 Lower
(renumbered as Anchorage No. 3A) and Anchorage No. 4, from 72 hours to
24 hours. Lastly, due to similar provisions within the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA) (Pub. L. 107-295) and
federal regulations (33 CFR part 104, and 46 CFR chapter 1, subchapters
N and O), the vessel security requirements in Sec. [thinsp]110.158(d)
are now redundant and will be removed as part of this regulation.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published
August 14, 2018. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule amends the Baltimore Harbor, Maryland anchorage grounds
as described in 33 CFR 110.158. The general anchorages currently listed
in the regulation that are affected by this rule are Anchorage No. 2,
Anchorage No. 3 Upper, Anchorage No. 3 Lower, Anchorage No. 4,
Anchorage No. 5 and Anchorage No. 6.
This rule reduces the sizes of Anchorage No. 2, Anchorage No. 3
Lower, and Anchorage No. 4. These reductions will remove the portions
of the anchorage grounds that are in the navigable channel. The area of
Anchorage No. 2 is reduced by approximately 16,330 square yards along
its northern limit and approximately 326,770 square yards along its
eastern limit. The area of Anchorage No. 3 Lower is reduced at its
eastern limit by 12,560 square yards. The area of Anchorage No. 4 is
reduced at its western limit by 6,000 square yards.
This rule renames Anchorage No. 3 Lower to Anchorage No. 3A, and
renames Anchorage No. 3 Upper to Anchorage No. 3B. This rule revises
Anchorage No. 2 and creates an area called Anchorage No. 3C out of
existing anchorage ground from Anchorage No. 2. An area within
Anchorage No. 2 that is approximately 500 yards in length and 165 yards
in width, and adjacent to Anchorage No. 3 Upper, becomes Anchorage No.
3C. This reconfiguration does not provide new space available for
anchorage, will not restrict traffic, and is located outside of the
established navigation channel. A graphic depicting these changes is
included in the docket.
This rule will reduce the duration a vessel may remain within
Anchorage No. 3 Lower (renumbered as Anchorage No. 3A) and Anchorage
No. 4, from 72 hours to 24 hours. These changes are based on
recommendations documented by the Port of Baltimore Harbor Safety and
Coordination Committee on September 8, 2010, and the Association of
Maryland Pilots. The Port of Baltimore Harbor Safety and Coordination
Committee's recommendation is available in the docket. The Coast Guard
agrees that the Committee's recommendation addresses the problem of
ensuring maximum availability and use of these anchorages. In addition,
this rule establishes that a vessel may remain within Anchorage No. 3C
for no more than 72 hours without permission from the Captain of the
Port, to remain consistent with the regulations for Anchorage No. 2.
This rulemaking renumbers several paragraphs listed in 33 CFR
110.158, from (a)(3) Anchorage No. 3, Upper, general anchorage, through
(a)(8) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage. All anchorage ground
descriptions will be updated to state they are in the waters of the
Patapsco River, except for Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage, which
will be updated to state it is in the waters of Curtis Bay. Designation
of the new Anchorage No. 3C will create a new paragraph, (a)(9) for
Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage. This rulemaking modifies
paragraph (c)(3) of the general regulations to remove the reference to
a vessel becoming ``a menace'' because we do not define that term and
we don't believe it is needed given other factors already included in
that paragraph. We also change the defined term ``dangerous cargo'' to
``certain dangerous cargo'' without changing the definition, continuing
to incorporate the definition of certain dangerous cargo from 33 CFR
160.202, and aligning terminology used in this rule with that used
throughout the rest of 33 CFR 110.158. This rulemaking removes
paragraphs (c)(4) regarding revocable permits for habitual use of an
anchorage, and paragraph (d) in its entirety, as described in section
III above.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the following: (i)
It will not interfere with existing maritime activity in Baltimore
Harbor, (ii) the changes will reduce navigational safety risk in
Baltimore Harbor by: (1) Aligning existing general anchorage boundaries
with recent dredging projects that widened the limits of adjacent
navigational channels, (2) reducing the duration a vessel may remain
within an anchorage to increase availability and usage, and (3)
renaming and reconfiguring general anchorages that support a proper
naming and numbering convention within the existing anchorage
regulation, and (iii) the
[[Page 16780]]
reconfiguration of the additional general anchorage does not provide
additional anchorage area and will not restrict traffic, as it is
developed from an existing anchorage and is located outside of the
established navigation channel. As discussed in section IV above, this
rule will replace the ``dangerous cargo'' definition with one for
``certain dangerous cargo'' and remove vessel security provisions that
are redundant to other federal regulations.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
the modification of existing anchorages within the Baltimore Harbor,
Maryland anchorage grounds. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L59(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071; 46 U.S.C. 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 110.158 to read as follows:
Sec. 110.158 Baltimore Harbor, MD.
(a) Anchorage Grounds--(1) No. 1, general anchorage. (i) All waters
of the Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following
points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]15'13.51'' N 76[deg]34'07.76'' W
39[deg]15'11.01'' N 76[deg]34'11.69'' W
39[deg]14'52.98'' N 76[deg]33'52.67'' W
39[deg]14'47.90'' N 76[deg]33'40.73'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 12
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(2) Anchorage No. 2, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'50.06'' N 76[deg]33'29.86'' W
39[deg]14'57.53'' N 76[deg]33'37.74'' W
39[deg]15'08.56'' N 76[deg]33'37.66'' W
39[deg]15'15.77'' N 76[deg]33'28.81'' W
39[deg]15'18.87'' N 76[deg]33'12.82'' W
39[deg]15'17.71'' N 76[deg]33'09.09'' W
39[deg]14'50.35'' N 76[deg]32'40.43'' W
39[deg]14'45.28'' N 76[deg]32'48.68'' W
39[deg]14'46.27'' N 76[deg]32'49.69'' W
39[deg]14'43.76'' N 76[deg]32'53.63'' W
39[deg]14'57.51'' N 76[deg]33'08.14'' W
39[deg]14'55.60'' N 76[deg]33'11.14'' W
39[deg]14'59.42'' N 76[deg]33'15.17'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours
[[Page 16781]]
without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(3) Anchorage No. 3A, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'15.66'' N 76[deg]32'53.59'' W
39[deg]14'32.48'' N 76[deg]33'11.31'' W
39[deg]14'46.27'' N 76[deg]32'49.69'' W
39[deg]14'32.50'' N 76[deg]32'35.18'' W
39[deg]14'22.37'' N 76[deg]32'43.07'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 24
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(4) Anchorage No. 3B, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'32.48'' N 76[deg]33'11.31'' W
39[deg]14'46.23'' N 76[deg]33'25.83'' W
39[deg]14'57.51'' N 76[deg]33'08.14'' W
39[deg]14'43.76'' N 76[deg]32'53.63'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 24
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(5) Anchorage No. 3C, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'46.23'' N 76[deg]33'25.83'' W
39[deg]14'50.06'' N 76[deg]33'29.86'' W
39[deg]14'59.42'' N 76[deg]33'15.17'' W
39[deg]14'55.60'' N 76[deg]33'11.14'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(6) Anchorage No. 4, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]13'52.92'' N 76[deg]32'29.60'' W
39[deg]14'04.38'' N 76[deg]32'41.69'' W
39[deg]14'09.35'' N 76[deg]32'39.89'' W
39[deg]14'17.96'' N 76[deg]32'26.44'' W
39[deg]14'05.32'' N 76[deg]32'13.09'' W
39[deg]14'00.05'' N 76[deg]32'17.77'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 24
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(7) Anchorage No. 5, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'07.89'' N 76[deg]32'58.23'' W
39[deg]13'34.82'' N 76[deg]32'23.66'' W
39[deg]13'22.25'' N 76[deg]32'28.90'' W
39[deg]13'21.20'' N 76[deg]33'11.94'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(8) Anchorage No. 6, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]13'42.98'' N 76[deg]32'19.11'' W
39[deg]13'20.65'' N 76[deg]31'55.58'' W
39[deg]13'34.00'' N 76[deg]31'33.50'' W
39[deg]14'01.95'' N 76[deg]32'02.65'' W
39[deg]13'51.01'' N 76[deg]32'18.71'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(9) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage. (i) All waters of Curtis
Bay, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]13'00.40'' N 76[deg]34'10.40'' W
39[deg]13'13.40'' N 76[deg]34'10.81'' W
39[deg]13'13.96'' N 76[deg]34'05.02'' W
39[deg]13'14.83'' N 76[deg]33'29.80'' W
39[deg]13'00.40'' N 76[deg]33'29.90'' W
(ii) The primary use of this anchorage is to lay up dead ships.
Such use has priority over other uses. Permission from the Captain of
the Port must be obtained prior to the use of this anchorage for more
than 72 hours.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section--
Certain dangerous cargo means certain dangerous cargo as defined in
Sec. [thinsp]160.202 of this chapter.
COTP means Captain of the Port Sector Maryland--National Capital
Region.
(c) General regulations. (1) Except as otherwise provided, this
section applies to vessels over 20 meters long and all vessels carrying
or handling certain dangerous cargo while anchored in an anchorage
ground described in this section.
(2) Except in cases where unforeseen circumstances create
conditions of imminent peril, or with the permission of the Captain of
the Port, no vessel shall be anchored in Baltimore Harbor or the
Patapsco River outside of the anchorage areas established in this
section for more than 24 hours. No vessel shall anchor within a tunnel,
cable or pipeline area shown on a government chart. No vessel shall be
moored, anchored, or tied up to any pier, wharf, or other vessel in
such manner as to extend into established channel limits. No vessel
shall be positioned so as to obstruct or endanger the passage of any
other vessel.
(3) Except in an emergency, a vessel that is likely to sink or
otherwise become an obstruction to navigation or the anchoring of other
vessels may not occupy an anchorage, unless the vessel obtains
permission from the Captain of the Port.
(4) Upon notification by the Captain of the Port to shift its
position, a vessel at anchor must get underway and shall move to its
new designated position within two hours after notification.
(5) The Captain of the Port may prescribe specific conditions for
vessels anchoring within the anchorages described in this section,
including, but not limited to, the number and location of anchors,
scope of chain, readiness of engineering plant and equipment, usage of
tugs, and requirements for maintaining communication guards on selected
radio frequencies.
(6) No vessel at anchor or at a mooring within an anchorage may
transfer oil to or from another vessel unless the vessel has given the
Captain of the Port the four hours advance notice required by Sec.
[thinsp]156.118 of this chapter.
(7) No vessel shall anchor in a ``dead ship'' status (propulsion or
control unavailable for normal operations) without prior approval of
the Captain of the Port.
Dated: April 17, 2019.
Keith M. Smith,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-08116 Filed 4-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P