Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 16628-16630 [2019-07937]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
16628
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2019 / Proposed Rules
informational requirements)? Why or
why not?
30. Should the FDIC endeavor to sync
the Resolution Plan submission timeline
for CIDIs with the timeline for DFA
Resolution Plans for DFA Resolution
Plan filers? If so, how?
31. Should the FDIC consider utilizing
an ad hoc submission program with
information regarding each pertinent
content area due at various times
throughout the submission cycle
(similar to an ongoing large bank
continuous examination program)
instead of maintaining the requirement
for a Resolution Plan submission due on
a single date? Why or why not?
32. The FDIC is considering one or
more conditions-based triggers to
increase resolution planning
engagement with a CIDI experiencing
stress or in troubled condition. If the
FDIC were to adopt such an approach,
what condition-based trigger or triggers
should the FDIC use, and why?
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, on April 16,
2019.
Valerie Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–08077 Filed 4–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0249; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–010–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017–25–
12, which applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes.
AD 2017–25–12 requires repetitive
inspections for cracking of the webs of
the stub beams at certain fuselage
stations, and applicable on-condition
actions. Since we issued AD 2017–25–
12, we have received reports of
horizontal cracking in the station (STA)
685 stub beam at the inboard end of the
upper chord and the outboard end of the
lower chord. AD 2017–25–12 did not
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Apr 19, 2019
require an inspection of the area where
the horizontal cracks were found. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections at certain fuselage stations
for cracking of the stub beams, and
applicable on-condition actions. We are
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 6, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster
Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717;
internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0249.
Jkt 247001
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0249; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Galib Abumeri, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712 4137;
phone: 562–627–5324; fax: 562 627
5210; email: galib.abumeri@faa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2019–0249; Product Identifier 2019–
NM–010–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM
because of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We issued AD 2017–25–12,
Amendment 39–19126 (82 FR 59967,
December 18, 2017) (‘‘AD 2017–25–
12’’), for all The Boeing Company Model
737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and
–500 series airplanes. AD 2017–25–12
requires repetitive inspections for
cracking of the webs of the stub beams
at certain fuselage stations, and
applicable on-condition actions. AD
2017–25–12 resulted from reports of
cracking in the webs of the stub beams
at certain fuselage stations. These cracks
are a result of fatigue caused by cyclical
loading from pressurization, wing loads,
and landing loads. We issued AD 2017–
25–12 to address cracking in the webs
of the stub beams at certain fuselage
stations, which, if not corrected, could
result in the loss of structural integrity
of the airframe during flight, collapse of
the main landing gear, and failure of the
pressure deck.
Actions Since AD 2017–25–12 Was
Issued
Since we issued AD 2017–25–12, we
have received reports of horizontal
cracking in the STA 685 stub beam at
the inboard end of the upper chord and
the outboard end of the lower chord.
These cracks were caused by overload of
the stub beams, leading to ductile
separation. Cracks have occurred in the
stub beam webs at STA 685 on the left
and right sides of airplanes having total
flight cycles ranging between 11,167
and 45,892 at the time of the crack
finding. If left undetected, such cracking
could lead to the loss of structural
integrity of the airframe during flight,
collapse of the main landing gear, and
possible failure of the pressure deck. AD
E:\FR\FM\22APP1.SGM
22APP1
16629
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2019 / Proposed Rules
STA 685 and STA 706 stub beam webs
and HFEC inspections for cracking in
repaired areas. This service information
is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
2017–25–12 did not require an
inspection of the area where the
horizontal cracks were found.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737–53A1364, Revision 1,
dated October 25, 2018. The service
information describes procedures for
inspections at certain fuselage stations
for cracking of the stub beams (which
includes the web, upper chord, and
lower chord), and applicable oncondition actions. The inspections
include high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) and detailed inspections for
cracking of the fuselage stub beam webs
below the passenger floor at STA 685,
STA 695, and STA 706, general visual
inspections for any existing repair in the
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain none
of the requirements of AD 2017–25–12.
This proposed AD would require
accomplishment of the actions
identified as ‘‘RC’’ (required for
compliance) in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737–53A1364, Revision 1,
dated October 25, 2018, described
previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
For information on the procedures
and compliance times, see this service
information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0249.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 171 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Action
Labor cost
Inspections .....
Up to 13 work-hours × $85 per hour =
$1,105 per inspection cycle.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Apr 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
Parts cost
$0
$1,105 per inspection cycle ...
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes and associated
appliances to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Cost on U.S.
operators
Cost per product
Sfmt 4702
$188,955 per inspection
cycle.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2.The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
AD 2017–25–12, Amendment 39–19126
(82 FR 59967, December 18, 2017), and
adding the following new AD:
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2019–0249; Product Identifier 2019–
NM–010AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by June 6, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces 2017–25–12, Amendment
39–19126 (82 FR 59967, December 18, 2017)
(‘‘AD 2017–25–12’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes,
certificated in any category.
E:\FR\FM\22APP1.SGM
22APP1
16630
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracking in the webs of the stub beams at
certain fuselage stations, and cracking of the
stub beam at fuselage station 685 at the
inboard end of the upper chord and the
outboard end of the lower chord. We are
issuing this AD to address such cracking,
which, if not corrected, could result in the
loss of structural integrity of the airframe
during flight, collapse of the main landing
gear, and failure of the pressure deck.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions for Group 1 Airplanes
For airplanes identified as Group 1 in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1364,
Revision 1, dated October 25, 2018, within
120 days after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the stub beams and stub beam webs
for any cracking or existing repairs, and do
all applicable on-condition actions, using a
method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Required Actions for Groups 2 Through
6 Airplanes
Except as specified by paragraph (i) of this
AD: At the applicable times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1364,
Revision 1, dated October 25, 2018, do all
applicable actions identified as ‘‘RC’’
(required for compliance) in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–53A1364, Revision 1, dated October 25,
2018.
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings.
To be approved, the repair method,
modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as specified by paragraph (i) of
this AD: For service information that
contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and (j)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(i) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
53A1364, Revision 1, dated October 25, 2018,
uses the phrase ‘‘the revision 1 issue date of
this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires using
‘‘the effective date of this AD,’’ except where
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1364,
Revision 1, dated October 25, 2018, uses the
phrase ‘‘the original issue date of this service
bulletin’’ in a note or flag note.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–53A1364, Revision 1, dated October 25,
2018, specifies contacting Boeing for repair
instructions: This AD requires doing the
repair before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Galib Abumeri, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO
Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627–
5324; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
galib.abumeri@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110 SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740 5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
April 10, 2019.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Apr 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
[FR Doc. 2019–07937 Filed 4–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0208]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; St. Lucie River, Stuart,
Florida
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone for
certain navigable waters of the St. Lucie
River in Stuart, Florida. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on these navigable waters east of the
Roosevelt/U.S. Route 1 Bridge during
the Stuart Air Show on July 4, 2019. The
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
vessels and persons from entering the
safety zone unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Miami (COTP). We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2019–0208 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Omar Beceiro,
Sector Miami Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone
305–535–4317, email omar.beceiro@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On March 27, 2019, Stuart Airshow
Inc. notified the Coast Guard that it
would be sponsoring the Stuart Airshow
from 6 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on July
4, 2019. The air show would be
conducted east of the Roosevelt/U.S.
Route 1 Bridge in the St. Lucie River in
E:\FR\FM\22APP1.SGM
22APP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 77 (Monday, April 22, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16628-16630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07937]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0249; Product Identifier 2019-NM-010-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-25-
12, which applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C,
-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. AD 2017-25-12 requires
repetitive inspections for cracking of the webs of the stub beams at
certain fuselage stations, and applicable on-condition actions. Since
we issued AD 2017-25-12, we have received reports of horizontal
cracking in the station (STA) 685 stub beam at the inboard end of the
upper chord and the outboard end of the lower chord. AD 2017-25-12 did
not require an inspection of the area where the horizontal cracks were
found. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections at certain
fuselage stations for cracking of the stub beams, and applicable on-
condition actions. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 6, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0249.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0249; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Galib Abumeri, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712 4137; phone: 562-627-5324; fax: 562 627
5210; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0249;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-010-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We issued AD 2017-25-12, Amendment 39-19126 (82 FR 59967, December
18, 2017) (``AD 2017-25-12''), for all The Boeing Company Model 737-
100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. AD 2017-25-12
requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the webs of the stub
beams at certain fuselage stations, and applicable on-condition
actions. AD 2017-25-12 resulted from reports of cracking in the webs of
the stub beams at certain fuselage stations. These cracks are a result
of fatigue caused by cyclical loading from pressurization, wing loads,
and landing loads. We issued AD 2017-25-12 to address cracking in the
webs of the stub beams at certain fuselage stations, which, if not
corrected, could result in the loss of structural integrity of the
airframe during flight, collapse of the main landing gear, and failure
of the pressure deck.
Actions Since AD 2017-25-12 Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2017-25-12, we have received reports of
horizontal cracking in the STA 685 stub beam at the inboard end of the
upper chord and the outboard end of the lower chord. These cracks were
caused by overload of the stub beams, leading to ductile separation.
Cracks have occurred in the stub beam webs at STA 685 on the left and
right sides of airplanes having total flight cycles ranging between
11,167 and 45,892 at the time of the crack finding. If left undetected,
such cracking could lead to the loss of structural integrity of the
airframe during flight, collapse of the main landing gear, and possible
failure of the pressure deck. AD
[[Page 16629]]
2017-25-12 did not require an inspection of the area where the
horizontal cracks were found.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1364, Revision 1,
dated October 25, 2018. The service information describes procedures
for inspections at certain fuselage stations for cracking of the stub
beams (which includes the web, upper chord, and lower chord), and
applicable on-condition actions. The inspections include high frequency
eddy current (HFEC) and detailed inspections for cracking of the
fuselage stub beam webs below the passenger floor at STA 685, STA 695,
and STA 706, general visual inspections for any existing repair in the
STA 685 and STA 706 stub beam webs and HFEC inspections for cracking in
repaired areas. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain none of the requirements of AD 2017-
25-12. This proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions
identified as ``RC'' (required for compliance) in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1364, Revision 1,
dated October 25, 2018, described previously, except for any
differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD.
For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0249.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 171 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections...................... Up to 13 work-hours $0 $1,105 per $188,955 per
x $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
$1,105 per
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2.The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
AD 2017-25-12, Amendment 39-19126 (82 FR 59967, December 18, 2017), and
adding the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2019-0249; Product Identifier
2019-NM-010AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by June 6, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces 2017-25-12, Amendment 39-19126 (82 FR 59967,
December 18, 2017) (``AD 2017-25-12'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
[[Page 16630]]
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracking in the webs of the
stub beams at certain fuselage stations, and cracking of the stub
beam at fuselage station 685 at the inboard end of the upper chord
and the outboard end of the lower chord. We are issuing this AD to
address such cracking, which, if not corrected, could result in the
loss of structural integrity of the airframe during flight, collapse
of the main landing gear, and failure of the pressure deck.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions for Group 1 Airplanes
For airplanes identified as Group 1 in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1364, Revision 1, dated October 25, 2018, within 120
days after the effective date of this AD, inspect the stub beams and
stub beam webs for any cracking or existing repairs, and do all
applicable on-condition actions, using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.
(h) Required Actions for Groups 2 Through 6 Airplanes
Except as specified by paragraph (i) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1364, Revision 1, dated October
25, 2018, do all applicable actions identified as ``RC'' (required
for compliance) in, and in accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1364, Revision
1, dated October 25, 2018.
(i) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1364,
Revision 1, dated October 25, 2018, uses the phrase ``the revision 1
issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires using ``the
effective date of this AD,'' except where Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1364, Revision 1, dated October 25, 2018, uses the
phrase ``the original issue date of this service bulletin'' in a
note or flag note.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1364, Revision 1,
dated October 25, 2018, specifies contacting Boeing for repair
instructions: This AD requires doing the repair before further
flight using a method approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as specified by paragraph (i) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and
(j)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Galib Abumeri,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5324; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected].
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110 SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 10, 2019.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-07937 Filed 4-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
