Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 16386-16390 [2019-07940]

Download as PDF 16386 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations original group of lap splice fasteners subject to the inspection. Damage tolerance inspections specified for existing repairs must continue. Inspections outside of the repaired boundaries are still required as specified in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018. (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES (j) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact David Truong, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627– 5224; fax: 562–627–5210; email: david.truong@faa.gov. (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (k)(3) and (k)(4) of this AD. (k) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018. (ii) [Reserved] (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; phone: 562–797–1717; internet https:// www.myboeingfleet.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:46 Apr 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 8, 2019. Michael J. Kaszycki, Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. R1–2019–07587 Filed 4–18–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1301–00–D DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2018–0903; Product Identifier 2018–NM–113–AD; Amendment 39–19616; AD 2019–07–05] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016–19– 14, which applied to certain Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. AD 2016–19–14 required repetitive inspections for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of any cracking. Since we issued AD 2016–19– 14, we have determined that the unsafe condition may exist on additional airplanes. This AD continues to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of any cracking. This AD also adds airplanes to the applicability. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective May 24, 2019. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 24, 2019. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office— EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airwortheas@airbus.com; internet https:// www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 0903. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 0903; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–231–3223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2016–19–14, Amendment 39–18663 (81 FR 71602, October 18, 2016) (‘‘AD 2016–19–14’’). AD 2016–19–14 applied to certain Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on November 5, 2018 (83 FR 55299). Since we issued AD 2016–19– 14, we have determined that the unsafe condition may exist on additional airplanes. This AD continues to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of any cracking. This AD also adds airplanes to the applicability. We are issuing this AD to address reading difficulties of flightcritical information displayed to the flightcrew during a critical phase of flight, such as an approach or takeoff, which could result in loss of airplane E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM 19APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES control at an altitude insufficient for recovery. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 2018–0131, dated June 19, 2018 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. The MCAI states: During an unscheduled maintenance operation on an A330 aeroplane, the 10VU rack was removed for access and cracks were discovered on 10VU rack side fittings on lugs 1, 3 and 4. As a similar design is installed on A320 family aeroplanes, a sampling review was done to determine the possible fleet impact. The result showed that several aeroplanes had cracked or broken 10VU rack side fittings. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to a high vibration level on the primary flight and navigation displays during critical flight phases (take-off and landing), possibly creating reading difficulties for the crew. Prompted by these findings, Airbus developed mod 35869 to reinforce the affected rack fitting lugs. For in-service aeroplanes, Airbus published SB [service bulletin] A320–92–1087 to provide detailed inspection (DET) and repair instructions. Consequently, EASA AD 2015–0170 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2016–19–14] was issued to require, for all pre mod 35869 aeroplanes, repetitive DET of the affected 10VU rack fitting lugs and, depending on findings, accomplishment of a repair. Since that [EASA] AD was issued, analysis confirmed the need to extend the inspection to post mod 35869 aeroplanes. Airbus issued SB A320–92–1119 providing instructions for DET and repair of those aeroplanes accordingly. Airbus developed mod 157335 to further reinforce and adjust the affected rack fitting lugs. Analysis is still ongoing to confirm mod 157335 as terminating action for the requirements of this [EASA] AD, and further AD action may follow. For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the requirements of EASA AD 2015–0170, which is superseded, expanding the Applicability to include post mod 35869 aeroplanes, and requiring, for all aeroplanes, repetitive DET of the affected 10VU rack fitting lugs and, depending on findings, accomplishment of a repair [and reporting positive and negative findings to Airbus]. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 0903. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:46 Apr 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA’s response to each comment. Request To Allow Flight With Cracked 10VU Lug JetBlue Airways requested that paragraph (i) of the proposed AD be revised to allow flight with one cracked 10VU lug and to require repair of that cracked 10VU lug prior to exceeding 5,000 flight cycles, 10,000 flight hours, or within 24 months after the effective date of the AD, whichever occurred first. The commenter noted that paragraph (i) of the proposed AD would require repair before further flight even if only one 10VU lug was cracked. The commenter stated that allowing flight with one cracked 10VU lug would be in line with the requirements of EASA AD 2018–0131, dated June 19, 2018, and the procedures described in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017; and Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119, dated July 28, 2017. The commenter noted that if more than one 10VU lug was cracked then the repair of all cracked 10VU lugs must be done before further flight. We disagree with the commenter’s request. As noted in the proposed AD, we have determined that, because of the safety implications and consequences associated with that cracking, any cracked 10VU rack fitting lug must be repaired before further flight. Our general policy does not allow flight with known cracks. This policy is based on the fact that such damaged airplanes do not conform to the FAA-certificated type design and, therefore, are not airworthy until a properly approved repair is made. However, under the provisions of paragraph (m)(1) of this AD, we will consider requests for approval of an extension of the compliance time if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the new compliance time would provide an acceptable level of safety, We have not changed this AD regarding this issue. Request To Clarify Testing Procedure Requirements United Airlines (UAL) requested that the final AD include a statement that the tests identified as ‘‘Required for Compliance’’ (RC) in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017 (‘‘A320–92–1087, Revision 03’’); and Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119, dated July 28, 2017 (‘‘A320–92–1119’’), are only applicable if the component identified PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 16387 in the test was removed and re-installed in the airplane. The commenter suggested that the final AD allow operators to conduct tests only on components that were removed so operators could get access to the areas required to do the inspections. The commenter noted that Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, subtask 921087–700–002– 001, ‘‘Testing,’’ provides a list of components to be tested, but includes a statement that the required testing is dependent upon which components were removed for access to do an inspection and then re-installed on the airplane. The commenter stated that Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119 does not include such a statement. The commenter explained that having this statement is important because not every component listed is installed on every 10VU rack, therefore operators could not do a test on a component that was never installed, and including this statement would account for different avionics equipment configurations within the 10VU rack. The commenter provided the example that some UAL airplanes are not equipped with angleof-attack indicators or an integrated stand instrument system, therefore the required tests could not be accomplished for these components. We agree with the intent of the commenter’s request and we will provide clarification regarding the RC tests. The intent of the RC tests in the Airbus service information is to require testing of equipment that was removed for access to do an inspection and then re-installed in the airplane. The Airbus service information includes this explanation regarding required testing in different locations. Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, paragraph 3.D.(2), ‘‘Subtask 921087– 700–002–001, Testing,’’ includes a statement that the testing is dependent upon which components were removed in order to do an inspection and are being re-installed on the airplane. The location of this statement in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119, paragraph 3.D.(2), ‘‘Subtask 921119– 710–001–001, Testing,’’ is in a note, which states that ‘‘The test procedure is to be accomplished after the installation of the equipment removed for access . . . .’’ This note has the same intent as the statement and operators are not expected to do testing on components that were never installed in the 10VU rack; operators only have to test components that were removed and then re-installed. We have not changed this AD regarding this issue. E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM 19APR1 16388 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations Request To Refer to Current Service Information UAL requested that, prior to publication of the final AD, we verify that the current published revision level of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92– 1087 and Airbus Service Bulletin A320– 92–1119 are referred to in the final AD. The comment stated that this would avoid the need to apply for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) immediately after publication of the final AD. We agree with the commenter’s request and we have verified that Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03; and Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119; are the current published revision levels of these documents. We have not changed this AD regarding this issue. should be allowed to report their findings to Airbus using a method of their choosing and that the proposed AD should not specify how operators should report their findings. We agree to clarify. Paragraph (j) of this AD does not require operators to report their findings using only the Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application. Paragraph (j) of this AD provides operators with the option of either using the Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application or submitting the results to Airbus in accordance with the instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03 (for Group 1 airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119 (for Group 2 airplanes); as applicable. We have not changed this AD regarding this issue. Request To Revise Reporting Method JetBlue Airways requested that paragraph (j) of the proposed AD be revised to remove the reference to the Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World (https://w3.airbus.com/). The commenter advocated that operators Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this final rule as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes: • Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and • Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 Airbus has issued Service Bulletins A320–92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017; and A320–92–1119, dated July 28, 2017. This service information describes procedures for repetitive inspections for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of any cracking. These documents are distinct since they apply to airplanes in different configurations. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 461 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: ESTIMATED COSTS Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators 2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 .......................................................................................... $0 $170 $78,370 We estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the reporting requirement in this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of reporting the inspection results on U.S. operators to be $85 per product. We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these repairs: ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product 83 work-hours × $85 per hour = $7,055 ................................................................................................................. $9,140 $16,195 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES Paperwork Reduction Act A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120–0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for reviewing VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:46 Apr 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM 19APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES Regulatory Findings We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. (2) For Group 2 airplanes: At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii) of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 40,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first, do a detailed inspection for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119, dated July 28, 2017. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:46 Apr 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016–19–14, Amendment 39–18663 (81 FR 71602, October 18, 2016), and adding the following new AD: ■ 2019–07–05 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39– 19616; Docket No. FAA–2018–0903; Product Identifier 2018–NM–113–AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective May 24, 2019. (b) Affected ADs This AD replaces AD 2016–19–14, Amendment 39–18663 (81 FR 71602, October 18, 2016) (‘‘AD 2016–19–14’’). (c) Applicability This AD applies to the Airbus SAS airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers. (1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122 airplanes. (i) Prior to exceeding 30,000 total flight cycles or 60,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs first. (ii) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD. (i) Repair If any crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD: Before further flight, do a repair in accordance with the Accomplishment PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 92, Electric and Electronic Common Installation. (e) Reason PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES § 39.13 (2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes. (3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes. (4) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of cracks found during maintenance inspections on certain 10VU rack fitting lugs. We are issuing this AD to address reading difficulties of flight-critical information displayed to the flightcrew during a critical phase of flight, such as an approach or takeoff, which could result in loss of airplane control at an altitude insufficient for recovery. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Definitions For the purpose of this AD, Group 1 airplanes are in a pre-Airbus Modification 35869 configuration, and Group 2 airplanes are in a post-Airbus Modification 35869 configuration. (h) Repetitive Inspections (1) For Group 1 airplanes: At the later of the times specified in table 1 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 40,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first, do a detailed inspection for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017. Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320– 92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017 (for Group 1 airplanes); or Service Bulletin A320–92–1119, dated July 28, 2017 (for Group 2 airplanes); as applicable. Repair of a 10VU rack fitting lug does not terminate the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD. E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM 19APR1 ER19AP19.000</GPH> that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division. 16389 16390 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations (j) Reporting At the applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD: Submit a report of findings (positive and negative) of each inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD to Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World (https:// w3.airbus.com/), or submit the results to Airbus in accordance with the instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017 (for Group 1 airplanes); or Service Bulletin A320–92– 1119, dated July 28, 2017 (for Group 2 airplanes); as applicable. Where Figure A– FAAAA, Sheet 02, of Appendix 01, ‘‘Inspection Report,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017; and Figure A–FAAAA, Sheet 02, of Appendix 01, ‘‘Inspection Report,’’ of Service Bulletin A320–92–1119, dated July 28, 2017; specifies sending removed lugs to Airbus for investigation, this AD does not include that requirement. (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the inspection. (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the effective date of this AD. (k) Credit for Previous Actions This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraphs (h)(1) and (i) of this AD if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES (l) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200. (m) Other FAA AD Provisions (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of the person identified in VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:46 Apr 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 paragraph (n)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator’s maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC. (n) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD 2018–0131, dated June 19, 2018, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0903. (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206– 231–3223. (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (o)(3) and (o)(4) of this AD. (o) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017. (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1119, dated July 28, 2017. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ airbus.com; internet https://www.airbus.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 9, 2019. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2019–07940 Filed 4–18–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2018–0706; Product Identifier 2018–NM–086–AD; Amendment 39–19612; AD 2019–07–01] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON and FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination of the need for a revision to the airplane airworthiness limitations to introduce changes to the maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations and maintenance requirements. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective May 24, 2019. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 24, 2019. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone 201– 440–6700; internet https:// www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM 19APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16386-16390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0903; Product Identifier 2018-NM-113-AD; Amendment 
39-19616; AD 2019-07-05]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016-19-14, 
which applied to certain Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series 
airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; 
and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 
airplanes. AD 2016-19-14 required repetitive inspections for cracking 
of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of any cracking. Since we 
issued AD 2016-19-14, we have determined that the unsafe condition may 
exist on additional airplanes. This AD continues to require repetitive 
inspections for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of 
any cracking. This AD also adds airplanes to the applicability. We are 
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective May 24, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 24, 2019.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, 
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile 
Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; 
internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service 
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th 
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this 
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available on the 
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating 
Docket No. FAA-2018-0903.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0903; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains 
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, 
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 to supersede AD 2016-19-14, Amendment 39-18663 (81 FR 71602, 
October 18, 2016) (``AD 2016-19-14''). AD 2016-19-14 applied to certain 
Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, 
-214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -
211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. The NPRM published in the 
Federal Register on November 5, 2018 (83 FR 55299). Since we issued AD 
2016-19-14, we have determined that the unsafe condition may exist on 
additional airplanes. This AD continues to require repetitive 
inspections for cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of 
any cracking. This AD also adds airplanes to the applicability. We are 
issuing this AD to address reading difficulties of flight-critical 
information displayed to the flightcrew during a critical phase of 
flight, such as an approach or takeoff, which could result in loss of 
airplane

[[Page 16387]]

control at an altitude insufficient for recovery.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 
2018-0131, dated June 19, 2018 (referred to after this as the Mandatory 
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an 
unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series 
airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 
airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and 
-232 airplanes. The MCAI states:

    During an unscheduled maintenance operation on an A330 
aeroplane, the 10VU rack was removed for access and cracks were 
discovered on 10VU rack side fittings on lugs 1, 3 and 4. As a 
similar design is installed on A320 family aeroplanes, a sampling 
review was done to determine the possible fleet impact. The result 
showed that several aeroplanes had cracked or broken 10VU rack side 
fittings.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to a 
high vibration level on the primary flight and navigation displays 
during critical flight phases (take-off and landing), possibly 
creating reading difficulties for the crew.
    Prompted by these findings, Airbus developed mod 35869 to 
reinforce the affected rack fitting lugs. For in-service aeroplanes, 
Airbus published SB [service bulletin] A320-92-1087 to provide 
detailed inspection (DET) and repair instructions. Consequently, 
EASA AD 2015-0170 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2016-19-14] was 
issued to require, for all pre mod 35869 aeroplanes, repetitive DET 
of the affected 10VU rack fitting lugs and, depending on findings, 
accomplishment of a repair.
    Since that [EASA] AD was issued, analysis confirmed the need to 
extend the inspection to post mod 35869 aeroplanes. Airbus issued SB 
A320-92-1119 providing instructions for DET and repair of those 
aeroplanes accordingly. Airbus developed mod 157335 to further 
reinforce and adjust the affected rack fitting lugs. Analysis is 
still ongoing to confirm mod 157335 as terminating action for the 
requirements of this [EASA] AD, and further AD action may follow.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the 
requirements of EASA AD 2015-0170, which is superseded, expanding 
the Applicability to include post mod 35869 aeroplanes, and 
requiring, for all aeroplanes, repetitive DET of the affected 10VU 
rack fitting lugs and, depending on findings, accomplishment of a 
repair [and reporting positive and negative findings to Airbus].

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0903.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the 
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Allow Flight With Cracked 10VU Lug

    JetBlue Airways requested that paragraph (i) of the proposed AD be 
revised to allow flight with one cracked 10VU lug and to require repair 
of that cracked 10VU lug prior to exceeding 5,000 flight cycles, 10,000 
flight hours, or within 24 months after the effective date of the AD, 
whichever occurred first. The commenter noted that paragraph (i) of the 
proposed AD would require repair before further flight even if only one 
10VU lug was cracked. The commenter stated that allowing flight with 
one cracked 10VU lug would be in line with the requirements of EASA AD 
2018-0131, dated June 19, 2018, and the procedures described in Airbus 
Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017; and 
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1119, dated July 28, 2017. The 
commenter noted that if more than one 10VU lug was cracked then the 
repair of all cracked 10VU lugs must be done before further flight.
    We disagree with the commenter's request. As noted in the proposed 
AD, we have determined that, because of the safety implications and 
consequences associated with that cracking, any cracked 10VU rack 
fitting lug must be repaired before further flight. Our general policy 
does not allow flight with known cracks. This policy is based on the 
fact that such damaged airplanes do not conform to the FAA-certificated 
type design and, therefore, are not airworthy until a properly approved 
repair is made. However, under the provisions of paragraph (m)(1) of 
this AD, we will consider requests for approval of an extension of the 
compliance time if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that 
the new compliance time would provide an acceptable level of safety, We 
have not changed this AD regarding this issue.

Request To Clarify Testing Procedure Requirements

    United Airlines (UAL) requested that the final AD include a 
statement that the tests identified as ``Required for Compliance'' (RC) 
in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 
2017 (``A320-92-1087, Revision 03''); and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
92-1119, dated July 28, 2017 (``A320-92-1119''), are only applicable if 
the component identified in the test was removed and re-installed in 
the airplane. The commenter suggested that the final AD allow operators 
to conduct tests only on components that were removed so operators 
could get access to the areas required to do the inspections.
    The commenter noted that Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, 
Revision 03, subtask 921087-700-002-001, ``Testing,'' provides a list 
of components to be tested, but includes a statement that the required 
testing is dependent upon which components were removed for access to 
do an inspection and then re-installed on the airplane. The commenter 
stated that Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1119 does not include such 
a statement. The commenter explained that having this statement is 
important because not every component listed is installed on every 10VU 
rack, therefore operators could not do a test on a component that was 
never installed, and including this statement would account for 
different avionics equipment configurations within the 10VU rack. The 
commenter provided the example that some UAL airplanes are not equipped 
with angle-of-attack indicators or an integrated stand instrument 
system, therefore the required tests could not be accomplished for 
these components.
    We agree with the intent of the commenter's request and we will 
provide clarification regarding the RC tests. The intent of the RC 
tests in the Airbus service information is to require testing of 
equipment that was removed for access to do an inspection and then re-
installed in the airplane. The Airbus service information includes this 
explanation regarding required testing in different locations. Airbus 
Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 03, paragraph 3.D.(2), 
``Subtask 921087-700-002-001, Testing,'' includes a statement that the 
testing is dependent upon which components were removed in order to do 
an inspection and are being re-installed on the airplane. The location 
of this statement in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1119, paragraph 
3.D.(2), ``Subtask 921119-710-001-001, Testing,'' is in a note, which 
states that ``The test procedure is to be accomplished after the 
installation of the equipment removed for access . . . .'' This note 
has the same intent as the statement and operators are not expected to 
do testing on components that were never installed in the 10VU rack; 
operators only have to test components that were removed and then re-
installed. We have not changed this AD regarding this issue.

[[Page 16388]]

Request To Refer to Current Service Information

    UAL requested that, prior to publication of the final AD, we verify 
that the current published revision level of Airbus Service Bulletin 
A320-92-1087 and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1119 are referred to 
in the final AD. The comment stated that this would avoid the need to 
apply for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) immediately after 
publication of the final AD.
    We agree with the commenter's request and we have verified that 
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 03; and Airbus Service 
Bulletin A320-92-1119; are the current published revision levels of 
these documents. We have not changed this AD regarding this issue.

Request To Revise Reporting Method

    JetBlue Airways requested that paragraph (j) of the proposed AD be 
revised to remove the reference to the Airbus Service Bulletin 
Reporting Online Application on Airbus World (https://w3.airbus.com/). 
The commenter advocated that operators should be allowed to report 
their findings to Airbus using a method of their choosing and that the 
proposed AD should not specify how operators should report their 
findings.
    We agree to clarify. Paragraph (j) of this AD does not require 
operators to report their findings using only the Airbus Service 
Bulletin Reporting Online Application. Paragraph (j) of this AD 
provides operators with the option of either using the Airbus Service 
Bulletin Reporting Online Application or submitting the results to 
Airbus in accordance with the instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin 
A320-92-1087, Revision 03 (for Group 1 airplanes); or Airbus Service 
Bulletin A320-92-1119 (for Group 2 airplanes); as applicable. We have 
not changed this AD regarding this issue.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this final rule as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We 
have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletins A320-92-1087, Revision 03, 
dated July 31, 2017; and A320-92-1119, dated July 28, 2017. This 
service information describes procedures for repetitive inspections for 
cracking of the 10VU rack fitting lugs, and repair of any cracking. 
These documents are distinct since they apply to airplanes in different 
configurations.
    This service information is reasonably available because the 
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of 
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 461 airplanes of U.S. registry. We 
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $85 per hour = $170...........................              $0             $170          $78,370
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to 
comply with the reporting requirement in this AD. The average labor 
rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of 
reporting the inspection results on U.S. operators to be $85 per 
product.
    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that 
would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no 
way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these 
repairs:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
83 work-hours x $85 per hour = $7,055.          $9,140          $16,195
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for 
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the 
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of 
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control 
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in 
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for 
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the 
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with 
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden 
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA 
at 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information 
Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition

[[Page 16389]]

that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the 
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by 
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is 
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but 
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the 
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and 
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 
2016-19-14, Amendment 39-18663 (81 FR 71602, October 18, 2016), and 
adding the following new AD:

2019-07-05 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-19616; Docket No. FAA-2018-0903; 
Product Identifier 2018-NM-113-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective May 24, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2016-19-14, Amendment 39-18663 (81 FR 71602, 
October 18, 2016) (``AD 2016-19-14'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus SAS airplanes identified in 
paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any 
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.
    (1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
    (2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 
airplanes.
    (3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 
airplanes.
    (4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 
airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 92, Electric and 
Electronic Common Installation.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of cracks found during 
maintenance inspections on certain 10VU rack fitting lugs. We are 
issuing this AD to address reading difficulties of flight-critical 
information displayed to the flightcrew during a critical phase of 
flight, such as an approach or takeoff, which could result in loss 
of airplane control at an altitude insufficient for recovery.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Definitions

    For the purpose of this AD, Group 1 airplanes are in a pre-
Airbus Modification 35869 configuration, and Group 2 airplanes are 
in a post-Airbus Modification 35869 configuration.

(h) Repetitive Inspections

    (1) For Group 1 airplanes: At the later of the times specified 
in table 1 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, and thereafter at 
intervals not to exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 40,000 flight hours, 
whichever occurs first, do a detailed inspection for cracking of the 
10VU rack fitting lugs, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 03, 
dated July 31, 2017.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR19AP19.000

    (2) For Group 2 airplanes: At the later of the times specified 
in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii) of this AD, and thereafter at 
intervals not to exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 40,000 flight hours, 
whichever occurs first, do a detailed inspection for cracking of the 
10VU rack fitting lugs, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1119, dated July 28, 
2017.
    (i) Prior to exceeding 30,000 total flight cycles or 60,000 
total flight hours, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.

(i) Repair

    If any crack is found during any inspection required by 
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD: Before further flight, do a 
repair in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 
Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017 (for 
Group 1 airplanes); or Service Bulletin A320-92-1119, dated July 28, 
2017 (for Group 2 airplanes); as applicable. Repair of a 10VU rack 
fitting lug does not terminate the repetitive inspections required 
by paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD.

[[Page 16390]]

(j) Reporting

    At the applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) 
of this AD: Submit a report of findings (positive and negative) of 
each inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD to Airbus 
Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World 
(https://w3.airbus.com/), or submit the results to Airbus in 
accordance with the instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-
1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017 (for Group 1 airplanes); or 
Service Bulletin A320-92-1119, dated July 28, 2017 (for Group 2 
airplanes); as applicable. Where Figure A-FAAAA, Sheet 02, of 
Appendix 01, ``Inspection Report,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
92-1087, Revision 03, dated July 31, 2017; and Figure A-FAAAA, Sheet 
02, of Appendix 01, ``Inspection Report,'' of Service Bulletin A320-
92-1119, dated July 28, 2017; specifies sending removed lugs to 
Airbus for investigation, this AD does not include that requirement.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of 
this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this 
AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the effective date of 
this AD.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by 
paragraphs (h)(1) and (i) of this AD if those actions were performed 
before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin 
A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014.

(l) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty 
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to 
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control 
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is 
estimated to be approximately 1 hour per response, including the 
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the 
collection of information. All responses to this collection of 
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this 
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to 
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Attn: 
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(m) Other FAA AD Provisions

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the 
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight 
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information 
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of 
the person identified in paragraph (n)(2) of this AD. Information 
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any 
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or 
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight 
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of 
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions 
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method 
approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards 
Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or 
Airbus SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by 
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information 
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those 
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any 
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. 
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be 
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the 
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining 
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as 
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy 
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests 
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(n) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information 
(MCAI) EASA AD 2018-0131, dated June 19, 2018, for related 
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet 
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket 
No. FAA-2018-0903.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan, 
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards 
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone 
and fax 206-231-3223.
    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not 
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in 
paragraphs (o)(3) and (o)(4) of this AD.

(o) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 03, dated 
July 31, 2017.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1119, dated July 28, 2017.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine 
No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax 
+33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; internet 
https://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport 
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 9, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-07940 Filed 4-18-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.