Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, 16572-16600 [2019-07827]
Download as PDF
16572
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
address listed in the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) section of this
preamble. A copy of these comments
also may be sent to the HHS
representative listed after the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT heading.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen McHugh, Director, Policy
Division, Children’s Bureau,
cbcomments@acf.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
45 CFR Part 1355
RIN 0970–AC72
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis
and Reporting System
Children’s Bureau (CB);
Administration on Children, Youth and
Families (ACYF); Administration for
Children and Families (ACF);
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACF proposes to amend the
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System (AFCARS)
regulations. This notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) amends the
AFCARS regulations that require title
IV–E agencies to collect and report data
to ACF on children in out-of-home care,
who exit out-of-home care to adoption
or legal guardianship, and children who
are covered by a title IV–E adoption or
guardianship assistance agreement.
DATES: In order to be considered, we
must receive written comments on this
NPRM on or before June 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: We encourage the public to
submit comments electronically to
ensure they are received in a timely
manner. Please be sure to include
identifying information on any
correspondence. To download an
electronic version of the proposed rule,
please go to https://www.regulations.gov/.
You may submit comments, identified
by docket number, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-Mail: CBComments@acf.hhs.gov.
Include [docket number and/or RIN
number] in subject line of the message.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. Comments that concern
information collection requirements
must be sent to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) at the
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary per Executive Order
13563
II. Background on AFCARS and Regulation
Development
III. Overview of Major Proposed Revisions to
Data Elements
IV. Implementation Timeframe
V. Public Participation
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of
Regulatory Provisions
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
I. Executive Summary per Executive
Order 13563
Executive Order (E.O.) 13563 requires
that regulations be accessible,
consistent, written in plain language,
and easy to understand. This means that
regulatory preambles for lengthy or
complex rules (both proposed and final)
must include executive summaries.
Below is the executive summary for this
AFCARS NPRM.
(1) Purpose of the AFCARS NPRM.
(a) The need for the regulatory action
and how the action will meet that need:
This NPRM proposes revisions to
streamline the AFCARS data elements
that were finalized in the AFCARS final
rule published on December 14, 2016
(81 FR 90524). This action is in
response to E.O. 13777 (issued February
24, 2017) that directed federal agencies
to establish a Regulatory Reform Task
Force to review existing regulations and
make recommendations regarding their
repeal, replacement, or modification.
The HHS Regulatory Reform Task Force
identified the AFCARS regulation as
one in which the reporting burden may
impose costs that exceed benefits.
(b) Legal authority for the final rule:
Section 479 of the Social Security Act
(the Act) mandates HHS regulate a data
collection system for national adoption
and foster care data. Section 474(f) of
the Act requires HHS to impose
penalties for non-compliant AFCARS
data. Section 1102 of the Act instructs
the Secretary to promulgate regulations
necessary for the effective
administration of the functions for
which HHS is responsible under the
Act.
(2) Summary of the Major Provisions
of the NPRM.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(a) Data Elements. We propose to
remove and replace the data elements as
described below to reduce the AFCARS
reporting burden. We propose to modify
the data elements in the out-of-home
care data file (§ 1355.44) that title IV–E
agencies must report. In particular, we
propose to streamline data elements
related to child information,
placements, and permanency planning
based on public comments to the
Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule
Making (ANPRM) and the work of
federal experts with an interest in
AFCARS data. We retained all data
elements in the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file
(§ 1355.45) with conforming changes
based on edits we made in § 1355.44.
(b) Conforming Changes. We propose
to make conforming changes to
§§ 1355.41, 1355.43, and 1355.46 to
update the citations or dates as a result
of our proposed amendments in other
sections.
(3) Costs and Benefits. The benefits
are that we will streamline the AFCARS
data elements which will reduce the
title IV–E agency reporting burden from
the 2016 final rule, thus resulting in an
estimated $39.2 million in total annual
savings. (Affected entities will continue
to incur $43.7 million in annual costs,
net of federal reimbursements,
attributable to the 2016 final rule.) This
NPRM, if finalized as proposed, is
expected to be an E.O. 13771
deregulatory action.
II. Background on AFCARS and
Regulation Development
AFCARS is authorized by section 479
of the Act, which mandates that HHS
regulate a data collection system for
national adoption and foster care data.
Title IV–E agencies must submit data
files on a semi-annual basis to ACF. We
use AFCARS data for a variety of
requirements, including but not limited
to budgeting, providing national
statistics on the child welfare
population, providing reports to
Congress, and monitoring compliance
with title IV–B and IV–E requirements.
AFCARS regulations were first
published in 1993 and states began
submitting data in fiscal year (FY) 1995.
At that time, the requirements were set
forth in regulations at 45 CFR 1355.40
through 1355.47 and the appendices to
part 1355. Per the 2016 final rule, the
requirements are set forth in regulations
at 45 CFR 1355.40 through 1355.47. The
regulations specify the reporting
population, standards for compliance,
and all data elements.
We published the 2016 final rule
revising the AFCARS regulations on
December 14, 2016 (81 FR 90524) and it
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
included child welfare legislative
changes that occurred since 1993, data
elements related to the Indian Child
Welfare Act (ICWA), and implemented
fiscal penalties for noncompliant
AFCARS data. The 2016 final rule
provided two fiscal years for title IV–E
agencies to comply with sections
1355.41 through 1355.47 and required
title IV–E agencies to continue to report
AFCARS data in accordance with
section 1355.40 and the appendices to
part 1355 until September 30, 2019.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Executive Order 13777
On February 24, 2017, the President
issued E.O. 13777 Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda to lower
regulatory burdens on the American
people. It directed federal agencies to
establish a Regulatory Reform Task
Force to review existing regulations and
make recommendations regarding their
repeal, replacement, or modification.
The HHS Regulatory Reform Task Force
identified the AFCARS regulation as
one in which the reporting burden may
impose costs that exceed benefits.
In response to the E.O. 13777, ACF
published two notices in the Federal
Register on March 15, 2018:
• NPRM proposing to delay the
implementation of the first AFCARS
report period under the December 2016
AFCARS final rule (45 CFR 1355.41-.47)
by an additional two fiscal years, until
October 1, 2021 (83 FR 11450).
• ANPRM soliciting specific feedback
on the AFCARS data elements, costs to
implement, and burden hours to
complete the work required to comply
with the 2016 final rule and listed
questions for which we sought a
response (83 FR 11449).
Implementation Delay of the 2016 Final
Rule
The comment period ended on April
16, 2018. In response to the NPRM on
implementation delay, we received 43
comments and based on the comments,
we issued a final rule to delay the
implementation of the 2016 final rule
for one additional fiscal year, until
October 1, 2020 (Published August 21,
2018, 83 FR 42225). However, since we
are proposing in this NPRM to revise the
AFCARS data elements, we will revisit
this implementation date to provide a
timeframe to allow title IV–E agencies
time to comply with the revised
AFCARS data elements when we
finalize this proposal through a final
rule.
Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
The ANPRM’s comment period was
open for 90 days and ended on June 13,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
2018. Through the ANPRM, ACF asked
the public to give specific feedback on
the AFCARS data elements, costs to
implement, and burden hours to
complete the work required to comply
with the AFCARS requirements in 2016
final rule. The ANPRM listed questions
specifically asking the public to
comment on regarding the 2016 final
rule:
• Identify the data elements that are
overly burdensome for title IV–E
agencies,
• Identify limitations title IV–E
agencies will encounter in data
reporting, including an explanation
with cost and burden estimates for
recordkeeping, reporting, and the
number of children in foster care who
are Indian children as defined in ICWA,
and
• Recommendations on data elements
to retain, simplify, and remove with
justifications, such as its use at the
national level or why the data would
not be reliable in national statistics and
would be better asked through a
qualitative case review.
In response to the ANPRM, we
received 237 comments from 38 states,
38 Indian tribes or consortiums, 62
organizations representing state or tribal
interests, national public advocacy
groups, professional associations,
universities, two members of Congress,
and 97 private citizens. The following is
a summary and analysis of the public
comments relevant to the specific issues
for which we sought input.
Summary of State Comments: Thirtysix of the 38 states supported making
revisions to streamline the AFCARS
regulation. This was based on each
state’s self-assessment of the cost and
burden/work hours needed at various
levels of the agency and the number of
hours it will take to complete the work
required to comply with the AFCARS
2016 final rule. States shared similar
concerns for implementing the
requirements of the 2016 final rule such
as: (1) Requiring the additional data
elements could adversely impact their
ability to provide safety, permanency,
and well-being for youth in their care;
(2) the additional work needed to
comply would pull valuable resources
away from the field and decrease the
amount of time caseworkers have to
work with families and children toward
reunification, safety and risk
assessments and planning, adoption,
and other permanency activities; and (3)
many new data elements are qualitative
and therefore more accurately evaluated
by quality assurance staff, through a
case review or other monitoring efforts.
The comments from the two states that
did not support revising AFCARS
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16573
focused on the value of the information
that may be gleaned from certain data
elements related to sexual orientation
and ICWA. Even though the vast
majority of states supported
streamlining the AFCARS data
elements, they also expressed that the
2016 final rule was a considerable
improvement to the current AFCARS,
will improve data reporting, and
provide national information on a
number of new topics, including ICWA,
health needs, and permanency. States
recognized that more comprehensive
data allows them to better understand
the children and families they serve.
However, they felt that the 2016 final
rule was far-reaching and made
suggestions for streamlining the data
elements, based on their cost and
burden analysis.
State Comments regarding Burden
Estimates: States ranged considerably in
estimating the work needed and length
of time it would take to comply with the
2016 final rule. The variability in state
estimates is expected and appropriate
because there is considerable variability
across states in sophistication and
capacity of information systems,
availability of both staff and financial
resources, and populations of children
in care. It is expected for a state with a
large number of children in foster care
to provide a much different burden
estimate than a state with fewer
children in foster care. Each state made
a case about the increased and excessive
burden as it applied to that specific
state. States estimated it would take
between 200 to 25,000 hours to
accomplish tasks related to the ICWArelated data elements and 800 to 70,000
hours for completing work on all other
data elements. Some of the tasks
associated with these wide-ranging
hours included:
• Developing or modifying policies,
procedures, rules, case management
systems, and electronic case records to
comply with the AFCARS requirements,
• Searching for and gathering the
information required to be reported for
the data elements,
• Entering the information into the
system, and
• Training staff on the requirements
and changes.
Hours related to developing and
administering staff training ranged from
20 to 102,000 hours depending on the
number of staff that require training and
materials that must be developed.
State Comments regarding Cost
Estimates: States’ estimates varied
considerably, depending on the size of
the state’s out-of-home care population,
staffing needs, the length of time states
have to implement new AFCARS
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
16574
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
requirements, and the level of current
system functionality, including
modifications needed and data
exchanges with other agency systems.
As mentioned previously, variability in
state cost estimates is appropriate
because significant differences exist
across state systems, resources, and
populations of children in care. States
estimated that total costs to comply with
the 2016 final rule ranged from $1
million for one year to $45 million over
multiple years. They provided ranges
for specific costs, such as $41 million to
hire and train new staff for
administrative support, $600,000 to $1
million for total initial costs, and
$741,000 to $11 million for ongoing
costs. These costs included:
• Analyzing policies, practice, and
casework to determine and implement
modifications to capture and report
data,
• Systems changes (for example,
contract and staff costs to revise
systems),
• Developing and administering staff
training, ongoing monitoring, and
quality assurance, and
• Reporting the data to ACF.
State Comments regarding Data
Elements: Based in large part on the cost
and hours required to complete the
work to comply with the 2016 final rule,
36 states are in favor of streamlining the
data elements in the 2016 final rule,
many of whom provided
recommendations. States recommended
revisions to the data elements around
education, health assessments and
conditions, youth pregnancy/fathering,
siblings, prior adoptions, caseworker
visits, and sex trafficking. The reasons
provided for streamlining included that
it would be costly to modify their
systems to report so many new data
elements (compared to the AFCARS
prior to the 2016 final rule) and they did
not see the benefit at the national level
for providing new information that was
not explicitly used for monitoring. A
third of the states expressed concerns
with the data elements around sexual
orientation and recommended they be
removed due to reasons such as it will
not be reliable because youth would
self-report, which could result in an
undercount, and due to the sensitive
and private nature of the information,
they questioned the implications of
having this information in a government
record. Regarding the ICWA-related data
elements, half of the states expressed
concern with the large number of and
detailed questions asked related to
ICWA’s requirements, with five states
expressly asking for no ICWA-related
data elements in AFCARS. Many states
felt that some of the ICWA-related data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
elements in the 2016 final rule are
redundant, overly detailed, could be
streamlined, or are too specific for a
national data set and are better suited
for a qualitative review. Four states
reported that ICWA-applicable children
in their out-of-home care populations
were well under one percent (1%).
However, states with higher numbers of
tribal children in their care reported that
they supported including limited
information related to ICWA in
AFCARS because they believe child
welfare programs will be enhanced by
having this information to inform policy
decisions and program management.
Summary of Comments from Indian
Tribes and Organizations Representing
Tribal Interests: The 38 Indian tribes/
consortiums and all organizations
representing tribal interests opposed
streamlining the AFCARS data elements
and primarily focused their comments
on ICWA’s requirements and the ICWArelated data elements. They did not
provide specific comments on or
estimates for cost or burden related to
the 2016 final rule. In general, they
expressed that the state burden in
collecting the ICWA-related data
elements is not significant enough to
warrant streamlining it because of their
concerns regarding ICWA compliance.
Most of the commenters provided the
following general reasons for keeping all
ICWA-related data elements in
AFCARS:
• ICWA has been law for 40 years but
there has been little in-depth data and
limited federal oversight regarding this
law.
• Collecting ICWA-related data in
AFCARS is a step in the right direction
to ensure that Indian families are kept
together when possible and provide
insight into state compliance with
ICWA’s requirements.
• Without any uniform, national data
regarding ICWA’s requirements,
policymakers do not understand the
scope of issues to inform policy
changes.
• While some Indian tribes reported
good working relationships with some
states, the commenters expressed
concerns that there are children in state
custody who are not identified as Indian
children and thus are not protected
under ICWA.
Largely, the commenters representing
tribal interests expressed support for
retaining all of the data elements in the
2016 final rule and specifically, all of
the ICWA-related data elements for
similar reasons as noted above. They
also expressed that:
• States should currently be asking
questions that ascertain whether a child
is an Indian child as defined in ICWA,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
including inquiring about the family’s
tribal membership status,
• Specific data elements on
notification of proceedings and transfers
to tribal court are important because the
timelines in ICWA are rarely met, and
• Information on termination of
parental rights, removals under ICWA,
and placement preferences are
important for determining ICWA
compliance.
Regarding the other data elements in
the 2016 final rule, the commenters
largely supported those for reasons such
as the information will underscore the
importance of certain casework
activities (e.g., sibling placement
whenever possible) and it will show
trends in removal circumstances,
placements, and permanency outcomes
that will inform policymaking and
provide a basis for education and
training.
Summary of Comments from
Organizations and Other Entities: The
two members of Congress and most
other advocacy and trade organizations,
universities, private individuals, and
other groups primarily focused their
comments on which data elements from
the 2016 final rule to remove or retain.
They did not provide specific comments
on or estimates for cost or burden
related to any aspect the 2016 final rule.
The majority of these commenters
opposed streamlining the data for
reasons similar to the commenters
representing tribal interests, such as
underscoring the importance of certain
casework activities and showing
national trends. The commenters
provided broad commentary on the
benefit of having new data outweighs
the burden of having to report it. A few
commenters supported streamlining
based on the cost and system changes
states will need to make to comply with
AFCARS requirements. We received
numerous comments that were outside
the scope of the ANPRM, which did not
address the questions for which we
sought public comment, such as there
has been ample opportunities to
comment on AFCARS via prior
rulemakings, repeated requests for
feedback is an undue burden, and ACF’s
authority to collect ICWA-related data
elements in AFCARS.
Commenters expressed support and
some offered modifications for
particular data elements in the 2016
final rule such as health assessments,
educational status and special
education, placement types, caseworker
visits, circumstances present at removal,
prior adoptions, title IV–E
guardianships, youth who are pregnant
or parenting, and youth who may be
victims of sex trafficking. They
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
suggested that updates to AFCARS were
long overdue and that the data elements
related to ICWA and sexual orientation
in particular will yield important
national information because current
methods of reporting, for example via
the Child and Family Services Plans
(CFSP) and case file reviews, do not
result in reliable or consistent data, thus
are ineffective at providing a national
picture of children placed in out-ofhome care.
Comment Analysis: We reviewed and
analyzed all of the ANPRM comments,
costs, and burden estimates and
considered them as it related to meeting
the requirements of E.O. 13777. ACF
heard the concerns and interests of all
stakeholders and after careful
consideration, we believe that proposing
revisions to the AFCARS regulation
through a NPRM is warranted and
within the spirit of E.O. 13777 to
streamline and reduce burden on title
IV–E agencies.
Commenters sufficiently argued that
many new data elements are qualitative
and therefore more accurately evaluated
by quality assurance staff, through a
case review, or other monitoring efforts.
We must strongly weigh the desire for
more information with the burden on
those who are required to report it. The
need for streamlining was convincingly
argued through the states’ detailed work
and cost estimates that the 2016 final
rule has many data elements that can be
streamlined while still providing critical
information on the out-of-home care
population from a national perspective.
More states submitted comments and
more detailed comments and cost/
burden estimates in response to the
ANPRM than in response to our
previous AFCARS proposals, thereby
providing us with much more rich and
valuable information than we have had
to date. Most of the state comments to
the ANPRM were detailed and
contained comprehensive burden and
cost estimates illustrating the work they
will have to undergo to implement the
2016 final rule. While some states
indicated that the 2016 final rule made
improvements in the AFCARS
requirements that will enhance the
knowledge about the children/youth in
out-of-home care, the vast majority
agreed and convincingly articulated that
some of the data elements should be
streamlined.
Regarding the ICWA-related data
elements, section 479(c)(1) of the Act
requires that any data collection system
developed and implemented under this
section must avoid unnecessary
diversion of resources from agencies.
Requiring every state to modify its
systems to be able to report on a large
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
number of data elements when the
foster care population does not reflect
that the data elements will be applicable
to a majority of their children does not
meet this mandate. Additionally,
according to AFCARS data on the
race\ethnicity distribution of
children\youth in care as of September
30, 2016, in 33 states, children who
have a reported race as American
Indian/Alaskan Native made up less
than one percent of the children in
foster care. We believe AFCARS can be
streamlined in a way that is responsive
to all concerned and in a way that can
balance the need for updated data with
reducing the burden on title IV–E
agencies.
In response to the commenters that
supported the data elements as
promulgated in the 2016 final rule, we
note that title IV–E agencies are to
develop case management/electronic
case records that meet the agency’s
business need. As such, title IV–E
agencies may collect all of the data
elements contained in the 2016 final
rule regardless of what is ultimately
required to be reported to ACF by title
IV–E agencies in a rule that finalizes
this NPRM. The AFCARS data elements
are information that we require be
reported to ACF, but we understand that
title IV–E agencies collect more
information in their own case records to
support case practice that meets the
needs of the children and families they
serve. We commend the willingness to
collect a more comprehensive array of
information. However, the information
we require title IV–E agencies to report
to ACF via AFCARS must take into
consideration and reflect the
circumstances and capacity of all title
IV–E agencies in setting the AFCARS
requirements.
ACF understands and appreciates that
Congress and stakeholders are interested
in the well-being of children in foster
care and we understand that national
data about these children is useful for
many reasons. However, the vast
majority of commenters that opposed
streamlining are not required to report
AFCARS data and did not offer any
specific estimates regarding the burden
or cost placed on reporting title IV–E
agencies. These commenters believed it
was necessary for agencies to report
qualitative data on particular topics
through AFCARS for policy making
purposes and justified it with general
statements that the benefits of more data
outweigh the burden to report it.
However, it was not well illustrated
why AFCARS is the best vehicle for
collecting this data when there are other
effective options for gathering
qualitative information at the national
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16575
level, such as via surveys, research, or
the Child and Family Services Review.
The suggestion that more data
elements in AFCARS is essential for
policy making was not sufficiently
validated in the ANPRM comments. It
would have been useful if the
commenters identified the specific
policies that they felt needed the
detailed level of AFCARS data so
urgently and why AFCARS specifically
is the best means for collection of this
data. Congress has passed
approximately 24 laws that significantly
amended federal child welfare programs
since 1995, when AFCARS became
effective. These policy changes were
made despite not having the additional
data from the 2016 final rule. Congress
recently amended the statute at section
479 of the Act to require data elements
it deems relevant for national public
interest. For example, Congress required
collection of information on sex
trafficking victims (section 479(c)(3)(E)
of the Act) and prior adoptions/
guardianships (section 479(d) of the
Act).
Based on state cost estimates, ACF is
also concerned that a significant
expansion of AFCARS at this time
would negatively impact states’ ability
to take advantage of the new title IV–E
prevention services program (see section
471(e) of the Act). Title IV–E is a cost
reimbursement program, therefore,
states must secure funding for the
services, interventions, evaluation, data
collection, and reporting out of their
own resources before being reimbursed
by the federal government for a portion
of those costs. State cost estimates of the
2016 final rule are significant. Imposing
additional reporting costs at this time,
coupled with the new limits on federal
funding for foster care maintenance
payments for children in certain
congregate care facilities and the
reinstatement of eligibility criteria for
infants and children up to age two in
the title IV–E adoption assistance
program included in the Family First
Prevention Services Act (Public Law
(Pub. L.) 115–123) may severely impede
states’ ability to opt into the title IV–E
prevention services program.
Input From Federal Agency Experts
As part of the process to meet the
requirements of E.O. 13777 and ongoing intra-agency collaboration related
to data collection and analysis at ACF,
the Children’s Bureau consulted with
the Department’s subject matter experts
with an interest in AFCARS data. We
reviewed each data element in the 2016
final rule and evaluated whether it is
needed for a specific purpose, such as
a title IV–B/IV–E statutory requirement
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16576
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
and program monitoring, Congressional
reporting, or budgeting, and to
specifically identify whether including
the data in AFCARS would improve the
accuracy and reliability of the data.
Given current budgetary constraints on
title IV–E and federal agencies, the
objective was to be clear on how each
data element meets a mandate and how
ACF will use the data, thus justifying it
being a requirement for reporting. The
subject matter experts identified a
number of data elements that do not
have a specific purpose for title IV–B/
IV–E statute or program monitoring,
Congressional reporting, or budgeting.
Additionally, the Children’s Bureau
consulted with representatives of the
Department of Interior (DOI) regarding
the ICWA-related data elements to
retain in AFCARS.
After considering all input from
ANPRM commenters and the
Department’s subject matter experts
with an interest in AFCARS, ACF
proposes to streamline the AFCARS
data elements to what ACF believes is
a reasonable amount. We believe that
this proposal meets the requests from
states to streamline and reduce
redundancies in the regulation; from
Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and
other stakeholders for keeping data
elements related to specific areas; and to
meet the requirements of E.O. 13777.
III. Overview of Major Proposed
Revisions to Data Elements
The revisions proposed in this NPRM
reflect ACF’s review and analysis of the
ANPRM comments and input from the
Department’s subject matter experts
with an interest in AFCARS data, and
consideration related to meeting the
requirements of the E.O. 13777. The
proposed revisions streamline the data
elements to ones with a specific purpose
for title IV–B/IV–E statute and program
monitoring, Congressional reporting,
budgeting, and areas where reporting of
required information to AFCARS would
improve the accuracy and reliability of
the data in AFCARS. An overview of the
major proposed revisions to the
AFCARS data elements follows.
For the out-of-home care data file, the
2016 final rule required approximately
272 items where we require title IV–E
agencies to report information. In this
NPRM, we propose to reduce these
points to approximately 183,
representing 170 that we propose to
keep from the 2016 final rule and 13 we
propose to modify.
We propose a simplification of data
elements related to health assessments,
child financial and medical assistance,
child’s relationship to foster/adoptive
parents and legal guardians, and inter-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
jurisdictional adoptive/guardianship
placements to keep only essential
information as identified by ANPRM
commenters on children in out-of-home
care and who exit to adoption or legal
guardianship. We propose to remove the
following data elements because the
information is too detailed or qualitative
for a national data set, it may be
inaccurately reported and therefore
would be difficult to portray in a
meaningful way and it does not have a
specific purpose for title IV–B/IV–E
statute and program monitoring,
Congressional reporting, or budgeting:
• Educational stability,
• authority for placement and care
responsibility,
• private agency living arrangement,
• juvenile justice involvement,
• transition plan and date, and
• interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship jurisdiction (name).
As stated in section II, a third of the
states expressed concerns with the data
elements around sexual orientation and
recommended they be removed. States
commented that if this information is
important to decisions affecting the
child, the information will be in the
case file; however, when it is not
pertinent, states said that asking for
sexual orientation may be perceived as
intrusive and worrisome to those who
have experienced trauma and
discrimination as a result of gender
identity or sexual orientation. This
would be a mandatory conversation a
worker must have in order to complete
the data elements. Mandating such a
conversation may be contraindicated
based on a child’s history of abuse or
neglect.
In addition to the ANPRM comments,
we reviewed the 2014 document
entitled ‘‘Current Measures of Sexual
Orientation and Gender Identity in
Federal Surveys’’ prepared by the OMB
Federal Interagency Working Group on
Improving Measurement of Sexual
Orientation and Gender Identity in
Federal Surveys. Most concerning to our
AFCARS work is the section of the
document that ‘‘reviews and identifies
issues for Federal agencies to consider
when choosing sexual orientation and
gender identity (SOGI) questions for
inclusion in Federal surveys and
administrative databases.’’ Overall,
regardless of whether questions on
sexual orientation are asked in a survey,
interview, or otherwise, they may be
considered sensitive and/or personal
which means that certain issues must be
considered. The paper specifically
indicates that ‘‘before incorporating
SOGI questions in surveys or
administrative databases, Federal
agencies need to consider the purpose
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
and objectives of the survey or database
and the reason to add SOGI questions.’’
Further, the paper advises that new
questions added to a survey or data base
should be validated with qualitative
techniques and question validation
efforts should include both the SOGI
and non-SOGI groups. In addition, the
paper identifies other considerations
when developing questions in this area.
This includes a person’s age, and the
paper specifically notes that’’ teenagers
may be in the midst of developing their
sexual orientation . . . and therefore
they may be unsure of how to respond
to SOGI questions.’’ Adolescents may
use different terms to describe their
sexual orientation than terms used by
adults. Bullying related to one’s sexual
orientation may cause some adolescents
to be reluctant to identify themselves
with terms that must be regulated in
AFCARS. This emphasizes the
importance that respondents are
confident that their responses are
private, anonymous, and confidential.
Other factors that are relevant to asking
questions related to sexual orientation
are cultural or racial/ethnic
considerations and geography. For
example, there may also be regional
differences in interviewers’ and
respondents’ comfort with questions
about their sexual orientation.
As a result of our review of the OMB
document, in particular, taking into
consideration the need to validate
questions related to sexual orientation
and ensure responses about sexual
orientation, especially with adolescents,
are private, anonymous, and
confidential, it is clear that AFCARS is
not the appropriate vehicle to collect
this information. It is not feasible for us
to test the validity or accuracy of adding
questions related to sexual orientation
across all title IV–E agencies.
Additionally, it is impossible to ensure
that a child’s response to a question on
sexual orientation would be kept
private, anonymous, or confidential
considering a caseworker would be
gathering this information to enter into
a child’s case electronic record.
Information in case records are kept
confidential, but because the child is in
the placement and care of the title IV–
E agency, information on the child’s
case must be disclosed to courts and
providers under specific circumstances,
to assist the child and family.
Information on sexual orientation, if it
is not relevant to the child’s needs, is
not appropriate to be included.
Information on sexual orientation is
more appropriately collected through a
survey because that would allow for
testing of the questions, training by staff
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
administering the survey, and
addressing the issues raised by the OMB
paper to provide more controls for
allowing anonymity, privacy, and
confidentiality.
We acknowledge that other personal
information is reported to AFCARS,
such as medical or mental health
information. This data, however, is
documented in official documents, such
as medical reports and records, and is
in the child’s case record because
section 475(1)(C) of the Act requires
health and education records be in the
case plan. Information on sexual
orientation is not required by the Act to
be in the child’s case plan, and while
states agreed that the individual workers
knowing this information about
children and families they work with
may help them in assisting families,
there is no statutory requirement that it
be reported to a national administrative
data set.
However, there was support from
commenters for keeping the
circumstance at removal on whether
there was family conflict related to the
child’s sexual orientation, gender
identity, or gender expression. This
means that agencies will report whether
this was a circumstance surrounding the
child at removal. This is different than
asking for someone’s sexual orientation
because the information would be
gathered during the course of the
investigation that resulted in the child’s
removal from the home and
documented in the case record. The data
element Child and family circumstances
at removal, has many circumstances to
which the agency will report whether
each ‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not apply.’’ If
family conflict related to the child’s
sexual orientation, gender identity, or
gender expression (§ 1355.44(d)(4)(xxx))
was not known as a circumstance
surrounding the child at removal, or
was not documented in the electronic
case record, the information will be
reported to AFCARS as ‘‘does not
apply.’’ This does not require the
worker to have a conversation in
instances where it is not appropriate or
not applicable to the child’s wellbeing.
We believe that this circumstance at
removal captures information
appropriate for a national data set that
will provide insight into issues of
potential discrimination, safety
concerns, and homelessness
experienced by youth because it is
inherent in what the circumstance is
asking. Additionally, there will be an
opportunity for analysis via a
combination of information gleaned
from other data elements, for example,
the sex and marital status of foster
parents, adoptive parents, and legal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
guardians. The information from these
data elements will provide an overview
of the number of foster, adoptive, and
legal guardian couples who identify as
non-heterosexual. While we understand
the importance of collecting sexual
orientation data and appreciate the
comments that supported keeping the
data elements, we must balance this
with the need to collect accurate data
per the statue and in a manner that is
consistent with children’s treatment
needs.
We propose a simplification of the
ICWA-related data elements to the
information that commenters to the
ANPRM and others during consultation
indicated were essential for identifying
the number of children in out-of-home
care nationally, who should be afforded
the protections of ICWA. The ICWArelated data elements from the 2016
final rule that we kept and revised are:
• Whether the state title IV–E agency
made inquiries of whether the child is
an Indian child as defined in ICWA,
• child’s tribal membership and all
federally recognized tribes that may
potentially be the Indian child’s tribe,
• whether ICWA applies for the child
and the date that the state title IV–E
agency was notified by the Indian tribe
or state or tribal court that ICWA
applies,
• whether the Indian child’s tribe(s)
was sent legal notice in accordance with
25 U.S.C. 1912(a), and
• tribal membership of mother, father,
foster parents, adoptive parents, and
legal guardians.
During consultation, tribal
representatives expressed a need for
information on the tribal membership of
children in foster care and their foster
care/adoptive placements, whether
ICWA applies to the child, and
notification of proceedings per ICWA
requirements. These data elements were
identified as the most important pieces
of information to be able to know the
number of children nationally where
ICWA applies and provide some
national information on whether the
state made inquiries and whether
notification to the Indian child’s tribe
occurred.
The ICWA-related data elements from
the 2016 final rule that we are removing
are request to transfer to tribal court,
denial of transfer, court findings related
to involuntary and voluntary
termination of parental rights, including
good cause findings, qualified expert
witness testimony, whether active
efforts were made prior to the
termination/modification, removals
under ICWA, available ICWA foster
care/pre-adoptive placement
preferences, adoption/guardianship
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16577
placement preferences under ICWA,
good cause and basis for good cause
under ICWA, and information on active
efforts. These data elements asked for
detailed information on ICWA’s
requirements, tied to DOI regulations
and the ICWA statute, and court actions.
We also understand that it is
important to states, Indian tribes, and
stakeholders to know the information
behind the data elements we are
removing. While we have demonstrated
that the detailed ICWA-related
information from the 2016 final rule is
not appropriate for AFCARS, we are
also demonstrating a commitment to
obtain alternative methods that will
inform aspects of ICWA. First, using the
information that will be reported for
other data elements proposed in the
NPRM, ACF, researchers, and others
will be able to analyze aspects of ICWA
to inform an assessment of ICWA that
occurs outside of AFCARS reporting.
Below are areas where commenters
identified they wanted to keep some of
the ICWA-related data elements and we
explain what we propose to collect in
other data elements that will inform
aspects of ICWA:
• Transfers: We propose to collect
whether any child in the out-of-home
care reporting population exits out-ofhome care to a transfer to an Indian tribe
(that operates a title IV–E program or
that does not operate a title IV–E
program) in § 1355.44(g)(4). We do not
require reporting on the specifics of
ICWA requirements as to whether there
was a request orally on the record or in
writing, whether the state court denied
the request, and good cause because this
information is better for a qualitative
assessment that can provide context.
The information proposed in this NPRM
on transfers can be used to inform a
qualitative assessment.
• Placement preferences for foster
care, adoption and guardianship: We
proposed to collect tribal membership of
foster/adoptive parents and guardians,
whether placement is relative or kin,
and the name of the jurisdiction where
the child is living for foster care (see
section 1355.44(e)). We do not require
reporting on what placements were
available, whether the placement meets
the requirements of the Indian child’s
tribe or ICWA, or whether the there was
good cause to deviate from the Indian
child’s tribe’s or ICWA’s placement
preferences. The information we
propose in this NPRM on placements
and tribal membership can be used to
inform a qualitative assessment that will
allow context, because placement
decisions are specific to the child’s
needs.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
16578
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
• Voluntary or involuntary
termination/modifications of parental
rights: We propose to collect whether a
termination/modification of parental
rights is voluntary or involuntary and
will require it be reported for all
children (§ 1355.44(c)(5)). We do not
require reporting of the ICWA-specific
requirements on court findings
regarding reasonable doubt on
continued custody, qualified expert
witness testimony, and whether efforts
to prevent the breakup of the Indian
family were unsuccessful. However,
knowing whether the termination/
modification was involuntary or
voluntary can be used to inform a
qualitative assessment on these
proceedings because these decisions are
specific to each case and court action
and thus need context to fully
understand them.
Additionally, the Court Improvement
Program (CIP) requires grantees to
engage in meaningful and ongoing
collaboration with the state child
welfare agency and tribes (section
438(b)(1)(C) of the Act). In furtherance
of this statutory mandate, the next
program instruction for the CIP will
encourage grantees to work with the
dependency courts across their
jurisdictions to enhance efforts to
collect and track key ICWA data
indicators. This is logical because the
requirements of ICWA and
accompanying regulations are upon
state courts. The capacity of state and
county courts to collect and track data
varies widely across the country. Many
courts either do not track ICWA-related
data currently or do so inconsistently.
The forthcoming program instruction’s
emphasis on collecting and tracking
ICWA-related data will be coupled with
technical assistance through the CB’s
technical assistance provider for CIP
grantees and the courts to help address
this historic and ongoing information
gap. CIP grantees will be encouraged to
use CIP grant funds to assess the court’s
ICWA practice, support the court’s data
infrastructure, and train key court
personnel on the importance of
monitoring ICWA. Specifically, CIP
grantees will be encouraged and
supported to collect and monitor data
on court inquiries, orders and findings
related to:
• Identification of Indian children as
defined in ICWA,
• notice to Indian tribes,
• tribal participation as parties in
hearings involving Indian children,
• tribal intervention in dependency
cases,
• transfer of ICWA cases to tribal
courts, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
• placement of Indian children
according to tribal preferences.
These are two examples of how we
are committed obtaining more
information on ICWA through
appropriate and alternative methods
that allow for a fuller understanding of
ICWA’s role in child welfare cases that
AFCARS cannot provide. Thus, based
on the ANPRM comments and
consultation, we believe that this
proposal represents a balance for the
need for data on the population of
children to whom ICWA applies and
state concerns for the burden and costs
for collecting and reporting the large
number of ICWA-related data elements
in the 2016 final rule.
We note that due to the low numbers
of children in the out-of-home care
reporting population where ICWA
applies, we will not be able to release
specific information regarding the
child’s tribal membership or ICWA
applicability to requestors, except for
the Indian tribe of which the child is or
may be a member. When AFCARS data
is released to the public by the National
Data Archive on Child Abuse and
Neglect (NDACAN), the data is deidentified, meaning that it does not
include names, numbers, or other
information that would make directly
identifying the children possible.
However, when the NDACAN provides
data on populations where the number
of children in the out-of-home care
reporting population is low (for
example, a county), there is a risk of
possibly identifying a child using a
unique combination of indirect
identifiers in the AFCARS data, such as
tribal membership and dates of
removals, placements, and exits. To
mitigate these risks, the NDACAN takes
specific measures in releasing the data
to protect confidentiality. Thus, to
protect the confidentiality of these
children, we will be unable to release
certain information related to tribal
membership or ICWA applicability,
except to the Indian tribe of which the
child is or may be a member.
IV. Implementation Timeframe
Implementation of changes to the
AFCARS data elements as described in
this NPRM will be dependent on the
issuance of a final rule. We expect
provisions in an eventual final rule to be
effective no sooner than the start of the
second federal fiscal year following the
publication of the final rule. A precise
effective date will be dependent on the
publication date of the final rule, but
this construct provides title IV–E
agencies with at least one full year
before we will require them to begin
collecting and reporting new AFCARS
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
data elements. We welcome public
comments on specific provisions
included in this proposed rule that may
warrant a longer phase-in period.
V. Public Participation
We understand that there have been
several opportunities to comment, in
general, on AFCARS. However, each
comment solicitation has been on a
different iteration of AFCARS. In this
NPRM, AFCARS is streamlined from the
2016 final rule, thus commenters must
focus their comments on the data
elements proposed in this specific
rulemaking. Commenters should
consider how this proposed iteration of
AFCARS will impact their work and
budgets and be specific when
commenting on this NPRM.
Commenters should identify the specific
data elements to which their comments
apply and provide specific supporting
information for the comment. We
welcome public comments on the data
elements that we are proposing to
remove or revise from the 2016 final
rule.
We encourage commenters to speak to
the following:
• Whether the information is readily
available or collected as part of the title
IV–E agency’s casework.
• Recordkeeping hours spent
annually to adjust existing ways to
comply with AFCARS requirements,
gather and enter information into the
electronic case management system, and
training and administrative tasks
associated with training personnel on
the AFCARS requirements (e.g.,
reviewing instructions, developing
training and manuals).
• Reporting hours spent annually
extracting the information for AFCARS
reporting and transmitting the
information proposed in this NPRM to
ACF.
• Timeframes required to complete
the work.
• Specifically how reporting the data
elements in this NPRM will enhance
their work with children and families.
We understand that stakeholders who
are not title IV–E agencies will not be
able to offer specific estimates regarding
the burden or cost placed on title IV–E
agencies for reporting AFCARS because
they are not required to report AFCARS
data. However, we believe that it would
be appropriate and helpful for
commenters to provide specific reasons
as to why they think AFCARS is the
most effective vehicle for collection of
the data proposed in this NPRM and
why no other current method is feasible
to collect the information. Additional
comments that would be helpful would
describe any work done to coordinate
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
with title IV–E agencies in collecting
and reporting data for AFCARS and how
AFCARS data, which is aggregated at
the national level, would help their
specific work with title IV–E agencies,
children, and families.
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of
Regulatory Provisions
Section 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption
and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting
System
This section states the scope of
AFCARS. Paragraph (c) of this section
prescribes the definitions of terms used
in the AFCARS data elements and these
terms as defined in the 2016 final rule
are unchanged. We propose to make
minor conforming amendments to
paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) to update the
citations to the ICWA-related data
elements as a result of our proposed
amendments to § 1355.44.
Section 1355.43 Data Reporting
Requirements
This section states the AFCARS data
reporting requirements and these
requirements are unchanged from the
2016 final rule. In paragraph (b)(3), we
propose that the title IV–E agency report
the date of removal, exit date, and exit
reason for each child who had an outof-home care episode prior to October 1,
2020. As stated in the 2016 final rule,
this means that title IV–E agencies do
not need to report complete historical
and current information for these
children. We are proposing this change
of the new date to October 1, 2020 to
conform to the date in the final rule we
published in the Federal Register on
August 21, 2018 (83 FR 42225).
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 1355.44 Out-of-Home Care
Data File Elements
This section states the data element
descriptions for the out-of-home care
data file.
Section 1355.44(a) General Information
In paragraph (a), we propose that title
IV–E agencies collect and report general
information that identifies the reporting
title IV–E agency as well as the child in
out-of-home care. We propose the data
elements below and they are unchanged
from the 2016 final rule.
Title IV–E agency. In paragraph (a)(1),
we propose that the title IV–E agency
indicate the name of the title IV–E
agency responsible for submitting
AFCARS data to ACF. A state title IV–
E agency must indicate its state name.
ACF will work with tribal title IV–E
agencies to provide guidance during
implementation.
Report date. In paragraph (a)(2), we
propose that the title IV–E agency
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
indicate the report period date, which is
the last month and year that
corresponds with the end of the report
period.
Local agency. In paragraph (a)(3), we
propose that the title IV–E agency report
the name of the local county,
jurisdiction, or equivalent unit that has
responsibility for the child. ACF will
work with tribal title IV–E agencies to
provide guidance during
implementation.
Child record number. In paragraph
(a)(4), we propose that the title IV–E
agency report the child’s record number,
which is a unique person identification
number, as an encrypted number. The
child record number must remain the
same for the child no matter where the
child lives while in the placement and
care responsibility of the title IV–E
agency and across all report periods and
out-of-home care episodes. This number
remains the same if the child exits the
out-of-home care data file and enters the
reporting population for the adoption
and guardianship assistance data file.
The title IV–E agency must apply and
retain the same encryption routine or
method for the child record number
across all report periods. The title IV–
E agency’s encryption methodology
must meet all ACF standards prescribed
through technical bulletins or policy.
Section 1355.44(b) Child Information
In paragraph (b), we propose that the
title IV–E agency collect and report
child specific information for the
identified child in out-of-home care.
Child’s date of birth. In paragraph
(b)(1), we propose that the title IV–E
agency report the child’s date of birth
including the month, day and year. If
the child was abandoned and the actual
date of birth is not known, an estimated
date of birth is to be provided. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of foster children.
Child’s sex. In paragraph (b)(2), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report only the child’s sex. The
proposed response options are ‘‘male’’
and ‘‘female’’. The response options are
unchanged from the 2016 final rule; the
only change is to the name of the data
element, from ‘‘gender’’ to ‘‘sex’’.
Commenters to the ANPRM suggested
that the data element ‘‘gender’’ in the
2016 final rule be revised to reflect a
gender other than male or female but
HHS did not identify a compelling
reason to increase the reporting burden
by requesting the provision of this
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16579
information, which might not be
collected consistently.
Reason to know a child is an ‘‘Indian
Child’’ as defined in the Indian Child
Welfare Act. In paragraph (b)(3), we
propose to require the state title IV–E
agency to report whether it made
inquiries to determine if the child is an
Indian child as defined in ICWA. The
2016 final rule requires state title IV–E
agencies to report whether it specifically
inquired with seven different people/
entities. We propose to modify this data
element from the 2016 final rule to
require the state title IV–E agency to
report generally whether inquiries were
made as to whether the child is an
Indian child as defined in ICWA and
remove the list of specific people/
entities. As we explained in section II,
the specifics of the individual people/
entities inquired with are better suited
for a qualitative review because this
information is too detailed for national
statistics and therefore would be
difficult to portray in a meaningful way.
However, during consultation, it was
noted that knowing whether the title
IV–E agency inquired about the child’s
status as an Indian child as defined in
ICWA is essential in determining
whether ICWA applies for a child.
Commenters to the ANPRM also noted
that this information is useful
demographic information on the
children in the out-of-home care
reporting population.
Child’s tribal membership. In
paragraph (b)(4), we propose to require
the state title IV–E agency to report
whether the child is a member of or
eligible for membership in an Indian
tribe and if so, indicate all of the
federally recognized tribes with which
the child may potentially be associated.
This information must be submitted in
a format specified by ACF. In the 2016
final rule, this is part of the data
elements on Reason to know a child is
an ‘‘Indian Child’’ as defined in the
Indian Child Welfare Act. We propose to
modify this data element from the 2016
final rule to make it a separate data
element asking about the child’s tribal
membership status and report all
federally recognized tribes that may
potentially be the Indian child’s tribe(s),
if applicable. During consultation, it
was noted that knowing whether the
child is a member of or eligible for
membership in an Indian tribe is
essential in determining whether ICWA
applies for a child. Commenters to the
ANPRM also noted that this information
is useful demographic information on
the children in the out-of-home care
reporting population.
Application of ICWA. In paragraph
(b)(5), we propose to require the state
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
16580
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
title IV–E agency to report whether
ICWA applies for the child and if yes,
the date the Indian tribe or state or tribal
court notified the state title IV–E agency
that ICWA applies. In the 2016 final
rule, this information is split among
multiple data elements that ask whether
the state title IV–E agency knows or has
reason to know that the child is an
Indian child as defined in ICWA,
whether a court determined that ICWA
applies, and if so, the date of the court
determination. We propose to revise this
data element from the 2016 final rule to
only ask whether ICWA applies for the
child, with a response of ‘‘yes’’, ‘‘no’’, or
‘‘unknown,’’ and if yes, the date the
state title IV–E agency was notified of
this determination. As we explained in
section II, commenters to the ANPRM
felt that some of the ICWA-related data
elements were redundant because they
asked for similar information in
multiple data elements. This is one area
that the commenters noted should be
combined. The data we propose to
collect in paragraph (b)(5) will identify
the child records in the out-of-home
care reporting population where ICWA
applies and will provide a national
number of the children in the out-ofhome care reporting population to
whom ICWA applies.
Notification. In paragraph (b)(6), we
propose to require the state title IV–E
agency to report whether the child’s
Indian tribe was sent legal notice, in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a), if
the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘yes’’ in paragraph (b)(5)(i). The data
element in the 2016 final rule requires
state title IV–E agencies to report also
whether notice was sent to the Indian
child’s parent or Indian custodian. We
propose to modify this data element
from the 2016 final rule to only require
the state title IV–E agency to respond
with ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ that it sent
notification to the Indian tribe.
Notification was identified during
consultation as a key aspect of ICWA’s
requirements that should remain in
AFCARS because notification is critical
to meaningful access to and
participation in adjudications. The data
will help identify to what extent
notification is being done by the state
title IV–E agency on a national level for
children in the out-of-home care
reporting population.
Child’s race. In paragraph (b)(7), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report the race of the child. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of foster children. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
paragraph (b)(7)(vi) for Race-unknown,
we added instructions to clarify that this
category does not apply when the child
has been abandoned or the parents
failed to return and the identity of the
child, parent(s), or legal guardian(s) is
known. If a child is abandoned, the title
IV–E agency must report per paragraph
(b)(7)(vii). We made this clarifying edit
to address some confusion expressed by
commenters to the ANPRM. All other
data elements are unchanged from the
2016 final rule.
Child’s Hispanic or Latino ethnicity.
In paragraph (b)(8), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the
child. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this
data element because section
479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the
collection of comprehensive national
information with respect to the
demographic characteristics of foster
children.
Health assessment. In paragraph
(b)(9), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report whether the child
had a health assessment during the
current out-of-home care episode. We
propose to simplify this data element
from the 2016 final rule to require the
title IV–E agency to respond ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no’’ and to remove the additional data
elements for reporting the date of the
child’s most recent health assessment
and if it was within the timeframes
established by the agency. Commenters
suggested removing these data elements
because the specific information around
the dates of health assessments and
whether they are timely is too detailed
for national statistics and therefore
would be difficult to portray in a
meaningful way. However, commenters
noted that knowing whether a child had
a health assessment will support ACF in
assessing the current state of the wellbeing of children placed in out-of-home
care and implementation of title IV–B
requirement around health assessment
and planning per section 422(b)(15)(A)
of the Act.
Health, behavioral or mental health
conditions. In paragraph (b)(10), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report whether the child was
diagnosed by a qualified professional as
having one or more health, behavioral or
mental health conditions from a list of
eleven conditions prior to or during the
child’s current out-of-home care
episode. If so, the agency must report
whether it is an existing condition or a
previous condition (a previous
diagnoses that no longer exists as a
current condition). The title IV–E
agency must also report if the child had
an exam or assessment, but none of the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
conditions apply, or if the agency has
not received the results of the exam or
assessment. When the child has not had
an exam or assessment, the agency must
indicate so. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We continue to propose
this data element because the annual
outcomes report to Congress includes
statistics on children with a diagnosed
disability and also must contain
information on children placed in a
child care institution with a special
needs or another diagnosed mental or
physical illness or condition, per
section 479A(a)(7)(A)(i)(III) of the Act.
The information needed for the annual
outcomes report to Congress comes from
AFCARS data.
School enrollment. In paragraph
(b)(11), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report whether the child
is a full-time student at and enrolled in
(or in the process of enrolling in)
elementary or secondary education, or is
a full or part-time student at and
enrolled in post-secondary education or
training, or college, or whether the child
is not enrolled in any school setting.
This is unchanged from the 2016 final
rule. We continue to propose this data
element because we will use this
information, combined with other
AFCARS data elements, to assess
nationally the well-being of children
placed in out-of-home care as part of
monitoring the title IV–B and IV–E
programs through reviews.
Educational level. In paragraph
(b)(12), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report the highest
educational level from kindergarten to
college or post-secondary education/
training, as well as a general
equivalency diploma (GED), completed
by the child as of the last day of the
report period. This is unchanged from
the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because we
will use this information, combined
with other AFCARS data elements to
assess nationally the well-being of
children placed in out-of-home care as
part of monitoring the title IV–B and IV–
E programs through reviews.
Pregnant or parenting. In paragraph
(b)(13), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report whether the child
has ever fathered or bore a child, as well
as whether the child and child(ren) are
placed together in foster care. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
This data element is used in the annual
report to Congress consistent with
section 479A(a)(7)(B) of the Act and
budget formulation for the title IV–E
program.
Special education. In paragraph
(b)(14), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report on the child’s
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
special education status by indicating if
the child has an Individualized
Education Program (IEP) or an
Individualized Family Service Program
(IFSP). This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this
data element because the annual report
to Congress must contain information
on children placed in a child care
institution receiving specialized
education, per section
479A(a)(7)(A)(i)(IV) of the Act.
Prior adoption. In paragraph (b)(15),
we propose to require the title IV–E
agency to report whether the child
experienced a prior legal adoption,
including any public, private, or
independent adoption in the United
States or adoption in another country,
and a tribal customary adoption, prior to
the current out-of-home care episode. If
so, the title IV–E agency must report the
date it was finalized and whether the
child’s prior adoption was an
intercountry adoption. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element to
fulfill the statutory mandate in section
479(c)(3)(C)(ii) and 479(d) of the Act
which requires information regarding
children who enter into foster care after
prior finalization of an adoption. This
information will also be used to
improve consistency with the data we
provide to the State Department for their
reports regarding international
adoptions. Currently, the information is
reported via a narrative in the CFSP and
annual updates. This proposed method
is preferred because currently the
information must be compiled from the
narratives and the reporting is not
consistent across title IV–E agencies.
Having this information in AFCARS
will improve the accuracy, reliability,
and consistency of the data because it
will become an automated reporting
through AFCARS.
Prior guardianship. In paragraph
(b)(16), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report whether the child
experienced a prior legal guardianship
and if so, to report the date that the
prior legal guardianship became
legalized. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We continue to propose
this data element to fulfill the statutory
mandate in section 479(d) of the Act
which requires information regarding
children who enter into foster care after
prior finalization of a legal
guardianship.
Child financial and medical
assistance. In paragraph (b)(17), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report whether the child received
financial and medical assistance, other
than title IV–E foster care maintenance
payments. We propose to revise this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
data element from the 2016 final rule to
simplify the types of assistance to be
reported to only include: ‘‘state/tribal
adoption assistance’’; ‘‘state/tribal foster
care’’; ‘‘Title IV–E adoption subsidy’’;
‘‘Title IV–E guardianship assistance’’;
‘‘Title IV–A TANF’’; ‘‘Title IV–B’’;
‘‘Chafee Foster Care Independence
Program’’; or ‘‘Other’’. The data element
in the 2016 final rule required state title
IV–E agencies to report also whether the
child received SSI or Social Security
Benefits, title XIX, title XXI, title XX, or
child support. We propose to remove
those five data elements due to ANPRM
comments that cited reporting on the
multiple financial options as
burdensome and suggested these data
elements be streamlined. The financial
categories that remain are the essentials
for children in out-of-home care to meet
the requirement in section 479(c)(3)(D)
of the Act related to the nature of
assistance supporting the child. The
other categories were determined to be
extraneous information and delineating
these categories in AFCARS does not
enhance information about the child
when other reporting methods, such as
the CB–496 financial reporting form,
exist to address this information.
Title IV–E foster care during report
period. In paragraph (b)(18), we propose
to require the title IV–E agency to report
whether a title IV–E foster care
maintenance payment was paid on
behalf of the child at any point during
the report period. This is unchanged
from the 2016 final rule. We propose to
continue this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(D) of the Act requires
the collection of the extent and nature
of assistance provided by federal, state,
and local adoption and foster care
programs and it is used for the federal
title IV–E reviews per 45 CFR 1356.71.
Siblings. In paragraphs (b)(19) through
(21), we propose to require title IV–E
agency to report the total number of
siblings that the child has, if applicable,
the number of siblings who are in foster
care as defined in § 1355.20, and the
number of siblings who are in the same
living arrangement as the child, on the
last day of the report period. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose these data elements
on siblings because we will use this
information, combined with other
AFCARS data elements to assess
nationally the well-being of children
placed in out-of-home care as part of
monitoring the title IV–B and IV–E
programs through the Child and Family
Services Reviews (CFSR).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16581
Section 1355.44(c) Parent or Legal
Guardian Information
In paragraph (c), we propose that the
title IV–E agency collect and report
information on the child’s parent(s) or
legal guardian(s).
Year of birth parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). In paragraphs (c)(1) and (2),
we propose to require the title IV–E
agency to report the birth year of the
child’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s). If
the child has both a parent and a legal
guardian, or two different sets of legal
parents, the title IV–E agency must
report on those who had legal
responsibility for the child. If the child
was abandoned and the identity of the
parent or legal guardian is unknown and
cannot be ascertained, the title IV–E
agency would indicate ‘‘abandoned.’’ If
there is not another parent or legal
guardian, the title IV–E agency would
indicate ‘‘not applicable.’’ This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of biological parents.
Tribal membership mother and father.
In paragraphs (c)(3) and (4), we propose
to require the title IV–E agency to report
whether the biological or adoptive
mother and father are members of an
Indian tribe. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. During consultation, it
was noted that knowing whether the
mother and father are members of an
Indian tribe is necessary in determining
whether ICWA applies for a child.
Termination/modification of parental
rights. In paragraph (c)(5), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
whether the rights for each parent were
terminated or modified on a voluntary
or involuntary basis. A voluntary
termination means the parent(s)
voluntarily relinquished parental rights
to the title IV–E agency, with or without
court involvement. In paragraph
(c)(5)(i), we propose that the title IV–E
agency report each date the petition to
terminate/modify parental rights was
filed, if applicable. In paragraph
(c)(5)(ii), we propose that the title IV–E
agency report the date parental rights
were terminated/modified, if applicable.
This is unchanged from the 2016 final
rule. Section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act
requires title IV–E agencies to report on
the status of the foster care population,
including children available for
adoption. The termination/modification
dates, petition dates, and whether it is
voluntary or involuntary is used for title
IV–E program monitoring via the CFSR
to monitor compliance with the
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16582
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
requirement in section 475(5)(E) of the
Act. In the case of a child who has been
in foster care under the responsibility of
the title IV–E agency for 15 of the most
recent 22 months, section 475(5)(E) of
the Act requires the title IV–E agency to
file a petition to terminate the parental
rights unless an exception exists, as
defined in statute. Having this
information in AFCARS will improve
the accuracy and reliability of the dates
to use for the CFSR.
Section 1355.44(d) Removal Information
In paragraph (d), we propose that the
title IV–E agency collect and report
information on each of the child’s
removal(s).
Date of child’s removal. In paragraph
(d)(1), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to collect and report the
date(s), on which the child was removed
for each removal of a child who enters
the placement and care responsibility of
the title IV–E agency. For a child who
ran away or whose whereabouts are
unknown at the time of removal, the
title IV–E agency would indicate the
date they received placement and care
responsibility. This is unchanged from
the 2016 final rule. We propose to
continue this data element consistent
with section 479(c)(3)(C) of the Act
which requires that the data collection
system include characteristics of
children entering out-of-home care. This
information is also used in the annual
outcomes report to Congress.
Removal transaction date. In
paragraph (d)(2), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report the
transaction date for each of the child’s
removal dates reported in paragraph
(d)(1) using a non-modifiable, computergenerated date which accurately
indicates the month, day and year each
response to paragraph (d)(1) was entered
into the information system. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
propose to continue this data element
consistent with section 479(c)(2) of the
Act which requires the collection of this
data element in order to assure that the
data collected is reliable and consistent
over time.
Environment at removal. In paragraph
(d)(3), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report the type of
environment (household or facility)
from a list of seven that the child was
living in at the time of each of the
child’s removals reported in paragraph
(d)(1). This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this
data element because it enables us to
analyze removals of children over time
for technical assistance and monitoring.
Child and family circumstances at
removal. In paragraph (d)(4), we
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report all of the circumstances
surrounding the child and family at
each removal reported in paragraph
(d)(1) from a list of 34 circumstances.
The agency must report all child and
family circumstances that are present at
the time of each removal, including the
circumstances that contributed to the
decision to place the child into out-ofhome care. We continue to propose this
data element because multiple sections
of the Act require the information that
will be reported in the circumstances:
Section 479(c)(3)(C) of the Act requires
identification of the characteristics of
children placed in foster care, the
annual outcomes report to Congress
must contain information on children
placed in a child care institution with
special needs or another diagnosed
mental or physical illness or condition,
per section 479A(a)(7)(A)(i)(III) of the
Act, and section 471(d) of the Act
requires an annual report to Congress
regarding information on children and
youth who are sex trafficking victims.
We propose to make only minor
revisions to three circumstances which
are in paragraphs (d)(4)(ix), (xxvi), and
(xxx). In paragraph (d)(4)(ix)
Abandonment, we propose to revise the
instruction to not include a child who
is left at a ‘‘safe haven’’ and in
paragraph (d)(4)(xxvi) Voluntary
relinquishment for adoption, we
propose to include the instruction that
this includes a child who is left at a
‘‘safe haven.’’ We understand from
providing technical assistance to title
IV–E agencies that there may be specific
laws and policies in the states that
separate children who are ‘‘abandoned’’
from those who are left at a ‘‘safe
haven’’ and a better reflection of this in
the data is to include children left at a
‘‘safe haven’’ under paragraph
(d)(4)(xxvi) Voluntary relinquishment
for adoption. In paragraph (d)(4)(xxx)
Family conflict related to child’s sexual
orientation, gender identity, or gender
expression, we modified the data
element definition to define it as the
child’s expressed or perceived sexual
orientation, gender identity, gender
expression, or any conflict related to the
ways in which a child manifests
masculinity or femininity. These
revisions clarify the purpose of the
circumstance, which is to know whether
the child’s expression or the caregiver’s
perception of the child’s sexual
orientation or gender identity is a
circumstance associated with the child’s
removal. The rest of the circumstances
are unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
Victim of sex trafficking prior to
entering foster care. In paragraph (d)(5),
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
we propose to require the title IV–E
agency to report whether the child had
been a victim of sex trafficking before
the current out-of-home care episode
and if yes, the agency must indicate
whether it reported each instance to law
enforcement and the dates of each
report. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this
data element because section
479(c)(3)(E)(i) of the Act requires the
data system collection include an
annual number of children who were
victims of sex trafficking prior to
entering foster care and this information
will inform reports required in sections
471(a)(34)(B) and 471(d) of the Act on
children and youth reported to be sex
trafficking victims.
Victim of sex trafficking while in
foster care. In paragraph (d)(6), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report whether the child was a victim
of sex trafficking while in out-of-home
care during the current episode and if
yes, the agency must indicate whether it
reported each instance to law
enforcement and the dates of each
report. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this
data element because section
479(c)(3)(E)(ii) of the Act requires the
data system collection include an
annual number of children who were
victims of sex trafficking while in foster
care and this information will inform
reports required in sections
471(a)(34)(B) and 471(d) of the Act on
children and youth reported to be sex
trafficking victims.
Section 1355.44(e) Living Arrangement
and Provider Information
In paragraph (e), we propose that the
title IV–E agency collect and report
information on each of the child’s living
arrangements for each out-of-home care
episode.
Date of living arrangement. In
paragraph (e)(1), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report the date
of each living arrangement. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act
requires that the data collection system
include the length of placement in an
out-of-home care setting.
Foster family home. In paragraph
(e)(2), we propose to require the title IV–
E agency to report whether or not a
child resides in a foster family home for
each living arrangement. If the title IV–
E agency reports ‘‘yes’’, then the agency
must complete paragraph (e)(3). This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act
requires that the data collection system
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
include the length and type of
placement.
Foster family home type. In paragraph
(e)(3), we propose to require the title IV–
E agency to report the foster family
home type. The title IV–E agency must
indicate whether each of the following
proposed foster family home types
‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not apply’’: licensed
home, therapeutic foster family home,
shelter care foster family home, relative
foster family home, pre-adoptive home,
and kin foster family home. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act
requires that the data collection system
include the type of placement for the
child.
Other living arrangement type. In
paragraph (e)(4), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report whether
a child is placed in one of 14 living
arrangements for a child who is not
placed in a foster family home, as
indicated in paragraph (e)(2) of this
section, for each living arrangement.
The proposed living arrangement types
are mutually exclusive and are as
follows: ‘‘group home-family-operated’’,
‘‘group home-staff-operated’’, ‘‘group
home-shelter care’’, ‘‘residential
treatment center’’, ‘‘qualified residential
treatment program’’, ‘‘child care
institution’’, ‘‘child care institutionshelter care’’, ‘‘supervised independent
living’’, ‘‘juvenile justice facility’’,
‘‘medical or rehabilitative facility’’,
‘‘psychiatric hospital’’, ‘‘runaway’’,
‘‘whereabouts unknown’’, and ‘‘placed
at home’’. We propose to modify the list
of options from the 2016 final rule to
include a ‘‘qualified residential
treatment program’’ as a new placement
option per revisions made by Public
Law 115–123 at section 472(k)(2)(A) and
(4) of the Act to add these specialized
placements where children may be
placed. Qualified residential treatment
programs must meet specific
requirements outlined at section
472(k)(4) of the Act and should not be
reported under the response option
‘‘residential treatment centers.’’ We also
propose to modify the definition of the
response option ‘‘residential treatment
center’’ to include when the child is
placed with a parent who is in a
licensed residential family-based
treatment facility for substance abuse
per section 472(j) of the Act. We
propose this revision due to the changes
made by Public Law 115–123 at section
472(j) of the Act to allow foster care
maintenance payments for a child
placed with a parent in these specified
placements. We propose to modify the
definition of the response option ‘‘child
care institution’’ to include a setting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
specializing in providing prenatal, postpartum, or parenting supports for youth
per section 472(k)(2)(B) of the Act, and
a setting providing high-quality
residential care and supportive services
to children and youth who have been
found to be, or are at risk of becoming,
sex trafficking victims per section
472(k)(2)(D) of the Act. We propose this
revision due to the changes made by
Public Law 115–123 at section 472(k) of
the Act. The other response options are
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act
requires that the data collection system
include the type of placement. The
annual outcomes report to Congress
must contain information on children
placed in a child care institution or
other setting that is not a foster family
home including the type of the
placement setting, per section
479A(a)(7)(A) of the Act.
Location of living arrangement. In
paragraph (e)(5), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report the
location of each living arrangement. The
proposed locations are as follows: ‘‘Outof-State or out-of-Tribal service area’’;
‘‘In-State or in-Tribal service area’’;
‘‘Out-of-country’’; and ‘‘Runaway or
whereabouts unknown’’. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(C) of the Act
requires that the data collection system
include information on children placed
in foster care outside the title IV–E
agency that has placement and care
responsibility.
Jurisdiction or country where child is
living. In paragraph (e)(6), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
and name the jurisdiction or country
where the child is living in a format
according to ACF’s specifications. This
is unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
We continue to propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(B) of
the Act requires that the data collection
system include information on children
placed in foster care outside the title IV–
E agency that has placement and care
responsibility. Further, this information
will be used to inform the information
provided in paragraph (e)(5).
Marital status of the foster parent(s).
In paragraph (e)(7), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
foster parent’s marital status. The
marital status response options are as
follows: ‘‘married couple’’, ‘‘unmarried
couple’’, ‘‘separated’’, and ‘‘single
adult’’. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this
data element because section
479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the
collection of comprehensive national
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16583
information on the demographic
characteristics of foster parents. Also,
this information is currently used to
inform recruitment campaigns for foster
parents.
Child’s relationship to the foster
parent(s). In paragraph (e)(8), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report the child’s relationship to the
foster parent(s). We propose to simplify
the response options from the 2016 final
rule from seven to three: ‘‘relative(s)’’,
‘‘nonrelative(s)’’, and ‘‘kin’’. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the collection of
comprehensive national information on
the demographic characteristics of foster
parents. However, we propose to
streamline the response options because
primarily we are interested in knowing
whether the child’s foster parent is a
relative, nonrelative, or kin. This will
inform placement types and be used for
foster parent recruitment campaigns.
However, the level of specificity in the
2016 final rule’s response options serves
no identified purpose.
Year of birth for foster parent(s). In
paragraphs (e)(9) and (14), we propose
to require the title IV–E agency to report
the year of birth of the foster parent(s).
If there is no second foster parent, then
the title IV–E agency must leave
paragraph (e)(14) blank. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of foster parents.
Foster parent(s) tribal membership. In
paragraphs (e)(10) and (15), we propose
to require the title IV–E agency to report
the tribal membership of the foster
parent(s). If there is no second foster
parent, then the title IV–E agency must
leave paragraph (e)(15) blank. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
Commenters to the ANPRM noted that
knowing whether the foster parents are
members of an Indian tribe will provide
information related to ICWA placement
preferences in AFCARS.
Race of foster parent(s). In paragraphs
(e)(11) and (16), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report the race
of the foster parent(s). If there is no
second foster parent, then the title IV–
E agency must leave paragraph (e)(16)
blank. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this
data element because section
479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the
collection of comprehensive national
information with respect to the
demographic characteristics of foster
parents.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16584
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of foster
parent(s). In paragraphs (e)(12) and (17),
we propose to require the title IV–E
agency to report the Hispanic or Latino
ethnicity of the foster parent(s). If there
is no second foster parent, then the title
IV–E agency must leave paragraph
(e)(17) blank. This is unchanged from
the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires
the collection of comprehensive
national information with respect to the
demographic characteristics of foster
parents.
Sex of foster parent(s). In paragraphs
(e)(13) and (18), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report the sex
of the foster parent(s). If there is no
second foster parent, then the title IV–
E agency must leave paragraph (e)(18)
blank. The response options are
unchanged from the 2016 final rule; the
only change is to the name of the data
element, from ‘‘gender’’ to ‘‘sex’’. We
propose this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires
the collection of comprehensive
national information with respect to the
demographic characteristics of foster
parents. Commenters to the ANPRM
suggested that the data element
‘‘gender’’ in the 2016 final rule be
revised to reflect a gender other than
male or female, but HHS did not
identify a compelling reason to increase
the reporting burden by requesting the
provision of this information, which
might not be collected consistently.
Section 1355.44(f) Permanency
Planning
In paragraph (f), we propose that the
title IV–E agency collect and report
information related to permanency
planning for children in out-of-home
care, which includes permanency plans,
hearings, and caseworker visits with the
child.
Permanency plan and date. In
paragraph (f)(1), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report each
permanency plan established for the
child. The proposed permanency plan
options are as follows: ‘‘reunify with
parent(s) or legal guardian(s)’’; ‘‘live
with other relatives’’; ‘‘adoption’’;
‘‘guardianship’’; ‘‘planned permanent
living arrangement’’; and ‘‘permanency
plan not established’’. In paragraph
(f)(2), we propose to require the title IV–
E agency to report the date of each
permanency plan. These data elements
are unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
We continue to propose these data
elements because section 479(c)(3)(B) of
the Act requires that the data collection
system include the goals for ending or
continuing foster care and this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
information is used in the annual
outcomes report to Congress.
Date of periodic review(s) and
permanency hearing(s). In paragraph
(f)(3), we propose to require the title IV–
E agency to report the date of each
periodic review, either by a court, or an
administrative review (as defined in
section 475(6) of the Act) that meets the
requirements of section 475(5)(B) of the
Act. In paragraph (f)(4), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
the date of each permanency hearing
held by a court or an administrative
body appointed or approved by the
court that meets the requirements of
section 475(5)(C) of the Act. These data
elements are unchanged from the 2016
final rule. This information will be used
for title IV–B/IV–E program monitoring
via the CFSR and having this
information in AFCARS will allow us to
more accurately assess the quality and
frequency of these hearings/reviews.
Caseworker visit dates and locations.
In paragraph (f)(5), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
the date of each in-person, face-to-face
caseworker visit with the child,
consistent with section 422(b)(17) of the
Act. In paragraph (f)(6), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
each caseworker visit location from two
response options: ‘‘Child’s residence’’
and ‘‘other location.’’ These data
elements are unchanged from the 2016
final rule. Currently, information on
caseworker visits to meet the
requirements of section 424(f) and
479A(a)(6) of the Act is reported via the
CFSP and annual updates. Reporting
this information in AFCARS instead
will improve the accuracy of the data
and alleviate the burden of agencies
having to report on this as a narrative
in the CFSP and annual updates.
Section 1355.44(g) General Exit
Information
In paragraph (g), we propose that the
title IV–E agency collect and report exit
information for each out-of-home care
episode. An exit occurs when the title
IV–E agency’s placement and care
responsibility of the child ends.
Date of exit. In paragraph (g)(1), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report the date for each of the child’s
exits from out-of-home care. If this data
element is applicable, the data elements
in paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) of this
section must have a response. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
propose to continue this data element
consistent with section 479(c)(3) of the
Act which requires that the data
collection system include the length of
a child’s placement in out-of-home care.
This information is also used in the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
annual outcomes report to Congress that
measures the length of time children are
in foster care, re-entry rates, and
permanency and calculating awards for
the adoption and guardianship
incentives payment program under
section 473A of the Act.
Exit transaction date. In paragraph
(g)(2), we propose to require the title IV–
E agency to report a non-modifiable,
computer-generated date which
accurately indicates the date of each
response to paragraph (g)(1) of this
section. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We propose to continue
this data element consistent with
section 479(c)(2) of the Act which
requires that the data collected is
reliable and consistent over time.
Exit reason. In paragraph (g)(3), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report the reason for each of the
child’s exits from out-of-home care. The
proposed exit reasons are as follows:
‘‘not applicable’’; ‘‘reunify with parents/
legal guardian’’; ‘‘live with other
relatives’’; ‘‘adoption’’; ‘‘emancipation’’;
‘‘guardianship’’; ‘‘runaway or
whereabouts unknown’’; ‘‘death of
child’’; and ‘‘transfer to another
agency’’. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. This information in
combination with the date of exit is
used in the annual outcomes report to
Congress that measures the length of
time children are in foster care, re-entry
rates, and permanency.
Transfer to another agency. In
paragraph (g)(4), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report the type
of agency that received placement and
care responsibility for the child if the
title IV–E agency indicated the child
was transferred to another agency in
paragraph (g)(3). The proposed agency
types are: ‘‘state title IV–E agency’’;
‘‘tribal title IV–E agency’’; ‘‘Indian tribe
or tribal agency (non-IV–E)’’; ‘‘juvenile
justice agency’’; ‘‘mental health
agency’’; ‘‘other public agency’’; and
‘‘private agency’’. This is unchanged
from the 2016 final rule. This
information is used to provide further
information on the transfer indicated in
paragraph (g)(3) that aids in data
accuracy consistent with the
requirement for reliable and consistent
data in section 479(c)(2) of the Act.
Section 1355.44(h) Exit to Adoption and
Guardianship Information
In paragraph (h), we propose that the
title IV–E agency collect and report
information only if the title IV–E agency
indicated the child exited to adoption or
legal guardianship in Exit reason
paragraph (g)(3) of this section.
Otherwise, the title IV–E agency must
leave paragraph (h) blank.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Marital status of the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s). In paragraph
(h)(1), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report the marital status
of the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). The marital status response
options are as follows: ‘‘married
couple’’; ‘‘married but individually
adopting or obtaining legal
guardianship’’; ‘‘unmarried couple’’;
and ‘‘single adult’’. This is unchanged
from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of
the Act requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of adoptive parents and
of children who exit from foster care.
Additionally, this information will
inform permanency outcomes
information and adoption recruitment
campaigns.
Child’s relationship to the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s). In paragraph
(h)(2), we propose to require the title
IV–E agency to report the type of
relationship between the child and the
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
We propose to simplify the response
options from the 2016 final rule from
seven to four: ‘‘relative(s)’’;
‘‘nonrelative(s)’’; ‘‘foster parent(s)’’; and
‘‘kin’’. We continue to propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(A)
and (c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act requires the
collection of comprehensive national
information on the demographic
characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care.
However, we propose to streamline the
response options because primarily we
are interested in knowing whether the
child’s adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s)
is a relative, nonrelative, or kin to
inform permanency outcomes data and
family recruitment. However, the level
of specificity in the 2016 final rule’s
response options serves no identified
purpose.
Date of birth of the adoptive parent or
guardian. In paragraph (h)(3) and (8), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report the date of the birth of the
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
The title IV–E agency must leave (h)(8)
blank if there is no second adoptive
parent, legal guardian, or other member
of the couple. This is unchanged from
the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of
the Act requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care.
Additionally, this information will
inform permanency outcomes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
information and adoption recruitment
campaigns.
Adoptive parent or guardian tribal
membership. In paragraph (h)(4) and (9),
we propose to require the title IV–E
agency to report whether the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s) is a member of
an Indian tribe. The title IV–E agency
must leave paragraph (h)(9) blank if
there is no second adoptive parent, legal
guardian, or other member of the
couple. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. Commenters to the
ANPRM noted that knowing whether
the adoptive parents or legal guardians
are members of an Indian tribe will
provide information related to ICWA
placement preferences in AFCARS.
Additionally, this information will
inform permanency outcomes
information and adoption recruitment
campaigns.
Race of adoptive parent or guardian.
In paragraph (h)(5) and (h)(10), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report the adoptive parent(s) or
guardian(s)’s race as determined by the
individual. The title IV–E agency must
leave paragraph (h)(10) blank if there is
no second adoptive parent, legal
guardian, or other member of the
couple. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We continue to propose
this data element because section
479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act
requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care.
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first
adoptive parent or guardian. In
paragraph (h)(6) and (h)(11), we propose
to require the title IV–E agency to report
whether the adoptive parent(s) or
guardian(s) is of Hispanic or Latino
ethnicity as determined by the
individual. The title IV–E agency must
leave paragraph (h)(11) blank if there is
no second adoptive parent, legal
guardian, or other member of the
couple. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We continue to propose
this data element because section
479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act
requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care.
Sex of first adoptive parent or
guardian. In paragraph (h)(7) and (12),
we propose to require the title IV–E
agency to report the sex of the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s). The title IV–E
agency must leave paragraph (h)(12)
blank if there is no second adoptive
parent, legal guardian, or other member
of the couple. The response options are
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16585
unchanged from the 2016 final rule; the
only change is to the name of the data
element, from ‘‘gender’’ to ‘‘sex’’. We
propose this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of
the Act requires the collection of
comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic
characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care.
Additionally, this information will
inform permanency outcomes
information and adoption recruitment
campaigns. While some agencies
currently allow individuals to identify
as a gender other than male or female
and commenters to the ANPRM
suggested that the data element
‘‘gender’’ in the final 2016 rule be
revised to reflect a gender other than
male or female, but HHS did not
identify a compelling reason to increase
the reporting burden by requesting the
provision of this information, which
might not be collected consistently.
Inter/Intrajurisdictional adoption or
guardianship. In paragraph (h)(13), we
propose to require the title IV–E agency
to report whether the child was placed
within the state or tribal service area,
outside of the state or tribal service area
or into another country for adoption or
legal guardianship. The proposed
placement types are as follows:
‘‘interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’; ‘‘intercountry adoption
or guardianship’’; and
‘‘intrajurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’. This is unchanged from
the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element to inform
permanency outcomes information,
adoption recruitment campaigns, and
statutorily mandated efforts to remove
barriers to placing children for adoption
in a timely manner per section
471(a)(23) of the Act.
Assistance agreement type. In
paragraph (h)(14), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to report the type
of assistance agreement between the
title IV–E agency and the adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). The
proposed assistant agreement types are
as follows: ‘‘Title IV–E adoption
assistance agreement;’’ ‘‘State/tribal
adoption assistance agreement;’’
‘‘Adoption-Title IV–E agreement nonrecurring expenses only;’’ ‘‘AdoptionTitle IV–E agreement Medicaid only;’’
‘‘Title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement;’’ ‘‘State/tribal guardianship
assistance agreement;’’ or ‘‘no
agreement’’. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We continue to propose
this data element because it is used in
calculations for the adoption and
guardianship incentives payment
program under section 473A of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16586
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Siblings in adoptive or guardianship
home. In paragraph (h)(15), we propose
to require the title IV–E agency to report
the number of siblings of the child who
are in the same adoptive or
guardianship home as the child. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element so
that the information reported can be
used with other AFCARS data elements
to assess nationally the current state of
the well-being of children adopted or in
a legal guardianship as part of
monitoring the title IV–E and IV–B
programs through the CFSR.
Section 1355.45 Adoption and
Guardianship Assistance Data File
This section states the data element
descriptions for the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file. The
data elements in this section are
unchanged from 2016 final rule with the
exceptions described below.
In paragraph (b)(2), we propose to
require the title IV–E agency to report
the sex of the child using the response
options of ‘‘male or’’ ‘‘female’’. The
response options are unchanged from
the 2016 final rule; the only change is
to the name of the data element, from
‘‘gender’’ to ‘‘sex’’. Commenters to the
ANPRM suggested that the data element
‘‘gender’’ in the 2016 rule be revised to
reflect a gender other than male or
female, but HHS did not identify a
compelling reason to increase the
reporting burden by requesting the
provision of this information, which
might not be collected consistently.
In paragraph (b)(3)(vi), for Raceunknown, we added instructions that
this paragraph must be reported if the
child or parent or legal guardian does
not know, or is unable to communicate
the race, or at least one race of the child
is not known. We also clarified that this
category does not apply when the child
has been abandoned or the parents
failed to return and the identity of the
child, parent(s), or legal guardian(s) is
known. We made these clarifying edits
to match edits we propose in section
1355.44(b)(7)(vi).
In paragraph (f), we propose to require
the title IV–E agency to indicate the
agency that placed the child for
adoption or legal guardianship from the
following three options: ‘‘title IV–E
agency’’; ‘‘private agency under
agreement’’; and ‘‘Indian tribe under
contract/agreement’’. In the 2016 final
rule, this data element was required to
be reported in the out-of-home care data
file in section 1355.44(h)(17). However,
as we examined AFCARS per E.O.
13777, we noted that this information
needs to be reported as part of the
adoption and guardianship assistance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
data file because we must know the
placing agency in order to calculate the
awards for adoption incentive payments
for ‘‘preadolescent child’’ adoptions per
section 473A(g)(6)(B) and ‘‘older child’’
adoptions per section 473A(g)(7)(B) of
the Act. Thus, instead of requiring title
IV–E agencies to report this information
in the out-of-home care data file, we
propose to require it be reported in the
adoption and guardianship assistance
data file.
Section 1355.46 Compliance
This section states compliance
requirements for AFCARS data. The
compliance requirements in this section
are unchanged from 2016 final rule and
state the type of assessments ACF will
conduct to determine the accuracy of a
title IV–E agency’s data, the data that is
subject to these assessments, the
compliance standards and the manner
in which the title IV–E agency initially
determined to be out of compliance can
correct its data. We propose to amend
paragraph (c)(2) to update the cross
references in this section to mirror the
proposed revisions to sections 1355.44
and 1355.45.
VII. Executive Orders 12866, 13563,
and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. ACF consulted with OMB
and determined that this proposed rule
does meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
Thus, it was subject to OMB review.
ACF determined that the costs to title
IV–E agencies as a result of this
proposed rule will not be economically
significant as defined in E.O. 12866
(have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
tribal governments or communities). As
required in E.O. 12866, a cost-benefit
analysis needs is included in this
proposed rule. Executive Order 13771,
entitled Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs (82 FR
9339), was issued on January 30, 2017.
This rule, if finalized, is considered an
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E.O. 13771 deregulatory action.
Annualizing these costs and cost
savings in perpetuity and discounting at
7 percent back to 2016, we estimate that
this rule would generate $29.9 million
in annualized cost savings discounted
relative to 2016 at 7 percent over a
perpetual time horizon, in 2016 dollars.
Details on the estimated costs of this
rule can be found in the Paperwork
Reduction Act analysis. This proposed
rule is considered an E.O. 13771
deregulatory action. As described
below, this NPRM will save
approximately 544,337 burden hours.
After multiplying by the average wage
rate of affected individuals, this
amounts to $39,192,264 in savings each
year, relative to the estimated costs and
burden of the 2016 final rule, in the year
this NPRM (when finalized) will
become effective, which is in FY 2021.
We used the information that states
provided in comments to the ANPRM
on the cost and burden associated with
implementing the 2016 final rule as the
basis for these burden estimate
calculations and reduced it by 33
percent to represent the reduction in the
workload associated with reporting the
data proposed in this NPRM relative to
the 2016 final rule. We relied on this
approach because of the type of data
elements that we removed, which
specifically were qualitative in nature
and required a significant amount of
training and staff time to locate the
information and ensure proper data
entry.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Secretary certifies, under 5 U.S.C.
605(b), as enacted by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354), that
this rule will not result in a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule does not
affect small entities because it is
applicable only to state and tribal title
IV–E agencies.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(Pub. L. 104–4) requires agencies to
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before proposing any
rule that may result in an annual
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation). In
2018, that threshold is approximately
$150 million. This proposed rule does
not impose any mandates on state, local,
or tribal governments, or the private
sector that will result in an annual
expenditure of $150 million or more.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Congressional Review
This regulation is not a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 8.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–58) requires
federal agencies to determine whether a
policy or regulation may affect family
well-being. If the agency’s
determination is affirmative, then the
agency must prepare an impact
assessment addressing seven criteria
specified in the law. This final
regulation will not have an impact on
family well-being as defined in the law.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Executive Order 13132
E.O. 13132 requires that federal
agencies consult with state and local
government officials in the development
of regulatory policies with federalism
implications. Consistent with E.O.
13132 and Guidance for Implementing
E.O. 13132 issued on October 28, 1999,
the Department must include in ‘‘a
separately identified portion of the
preamble to the regulation’’ a
‘‘federalism summary impact statement’’
(Secs. 6(b)(2)(B) & (c)(2)). The
Department’s federalism summary
impact statement is as follows—
• ‘‘A description of the extent of the
agency’s prior consultation with state
and local officials’’—The public
comment period is open for 60 days
wherein we solicit comments via
regulations.gov, email, and postal mail.
During this comment period, we will
hold informational calls.
• ‘‘A summary of the nature of their
concerns and the agency’s position
supporting the need to issue the
regulation’’—As we discussed in
sections II and III of the preamble to this
proposed rule, state commenters
support making revisions to streamline
the AFCARS regulation. However,
Indian tribes, organizations representing
tribal interests, and most other national
advocacy organizations, universities,
private individuals, and other groups
opposed streamlining. We took the
comments into consideration and
believe that based on our analysis of the
comments, the best way to reduce the
burden to title IV–E agencies, who are
required to submit the data to ACF and
will be held to penalties for noncompliant data submissions, is to
propose revisions to the AFCARS
regulation through a NPRM. We believe
that the states sufficiently argued
through detailed work and cost
estimates in response to the ANPRM
that the 2016 final rule has many data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
elements that can be streamlined while
still providing critical information on
the reporting population.
• ‘‘A statement of the extent to which
the concerns of state and local officials
have been met’’ (Secs. 6(b)(2)(B) and
6(c)(2))—As we discussed in the
section-by-section discussion preamble,
we propose in the NPRM fewer data
elements than is in the 2016 final rule,
many of which were identified in state
comments to the ANPRM to be overly
burdensome for numerous reasons. We
believe that these reduced data
requirements balance the need for
updated information with the burden to
comply with AFCARS requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains information
collection requirements (ICRs) that are
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. A description of
these provisions is given in the
following paragraphs with an estimate
of the annual burden. To fairly evaluate
whether an information collection
should be approved by OMB, the
Department solicits comment on the
following issues:
• The need for the information
collection and its usefulness in carrying
out the proper functions of our agency.
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
information collection burden.
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected.
• Recommendations to minimize the
information collection burden on the
affected public, including automated
collection techniques.
Information collection for AFCARS is
currently authorized under OMB
number 0970–0422. This proposed rule
contains information collection
requirements in proposed § 1355.44, the
out-of-home care data file, and
§ 1355.45, the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file, that
the Department has submitted to OMB
for its review. We propose:
• State and tribal title IV–E agencies
to report information on children who
are in the out-of-home care reporting
population per § 1355.42(a),
• State and tribal title IV–E agencies
to report information on children who
are in the adoption and guardianship
assistance reporting population per
§ 1355.42(b), and
• State title IV–E agencies to report
ICWA-related information in the out-ofhome care data file.
Burden Estimate
PO 00000
The following are estimates.
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16587
Through the ANPRM, ACF asked the
public to give specific feedback on the
AFCARS data elements, costs to
implement, and burden hours to
complete the work required to comply
with the AFCARS requirements in 2016
final rule. The ANPRM listed questions
specifically asking the public to identify
the data elements that are overly
burdensome for title IV–E agencies, an
explanation with cost and burden
estimates for recordkeeping, reporting,
and recommendations on data elements
to retain, simplify, and remove with
justifications. Section II of the preamble
provides a summary and analysis of the
ANPRM comments. Regarding burden,
the state commenters provided
estimates for the recordkeeping and
reporting burden hours to implement
the 2016 final rule. This included
identifying the staff positions that we
used to determine the labor rate, hour
estimates for searching data sources,
gathering information, entering the
information into the system, developing
or modifying procedures and systems to
collect, validate, and verify the
information and adjusting existing ways
to comply with AFCARS requirements,
and training personnel on AFCARS
requirements. We used the estimates
provided by states to determine the cost
to implement the 2016 final rule. In this
section, we discuss our assumptions for
the estimates and calculations for
estimates.
For the 2016 final rule, based on the
state ANPRM comments, we estimate
the total burden of the 2016 final rule
to be 1,768,744 hours. We estimated this
by using either the median or the
average of the states’ estimates for the
various recordkeeping and reporting
tasks and adding them together. States
ranged considerably in estimating the
work needed and length of time it
would take to comply with the 2016
final rule, which is expected and
appropriate because there is
considerable variability across states in
sophistication of information systems,
availability of both staff and financial
resources, and populations of children
in care. Thus, we used the median of the
states’ estimates for the estimates related
to training and developing or modifying
procedures and systems. We used the
average of the states’ estimates for the
estimates of gathering/entering
information, reporting, and the labor
rate.
To estimate the burden of this NPRM,
we used the estimates to implement the
2016 final rule and reduced the
recordkeeping hours and reporting
hours by approximately 33 percent. This
represents the approximate workload
reduction associated with reporting
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16588
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
fewer data elements as proposed in this
NPRM.
Respondents: The 66 respondents
comprise 52 state title IV–E agencies
and 14 tribal title IV–E agencies, which
are Indian tribes, tribal organizations or
consortium with an approved title IV–
E plan under section 479B of the Act.
The estimates provided in the NPRM are
spread across respondents for the
purposes of the PRA estimates;
however, we understand based on the
ANPRM comments that actual burden
hours and costs will vary due to
sophistication and capacity of
information systems, availability of staff
Annualized Cost to the Federal
Government
Federal reimbursement under title IV–
E will be available for a portion of the
costs that title IV–E agencies will incur
as a result of the revisions proposed in
this rule, depending on each agency’s
cost allocation plan, information
system, and other factors. For this
estimate, we used the 50% Federal
Financial Participation (FFP) rate.
Average
hourly labor
rate
Total annual
burden hours
Collection—AFCARS
Total cost
Estimate
Federal costs
(50% FFP)
Recordkeeping .................................................................................................
Reporting .........................................................................................................
1,212,163
2,244
$72
72
$87,275,736
161,568
$43,637,868
80,784
Total ..........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
43,718,652
Cost savings of NPRM: 544,337 hours ×
$72 labor rate = $39,192,264
Assumptions for Estimates
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Reporting burden: Extracting the
information for AFCARS reporting and
transmitting the information to ACF.
and financial resources, and
populations of children in care.
Recordkeeping burden: Searching
data sources, gathering information, and
entering the information into the
system, developing or modifying
procedures and systems to collect,
validate, and verify the information and
adjusting existing ways to comply with
AFCARS requirements, administrative
tasks associated with training personnel
on the AFCARS requirements (e.g.,
reviewing instructions, developing the
training and manuals), and training
personnel on AFCARS requirements.
We made a number of assumptions
when calculating the burden and costs
that were informed by the states’
estimates provided in their comments to
the ANPRM:
• Number of children in out-of-home
care: To determine the number of
children for which title IV–E agencies
will have to report in the out-of-home
care data file on average, ACF used the
most recent FY 2016 AFCARS data
available: 273,539 children entered in
foster care during FY 2016. Of those,
6,033 children had a reported race of
American Indian/Alaska Native. We
used the number of children who
entered foster care rather than the entire
population of children in foster care
because agencies will not have to collect
and report all data elements on all
children in foster care; therefore, this
accounts for the variances in burden.
This is consistent with the 2016 final
rule and the 2016 final rule is what we
use to estimate the relative savings of
this NPRM.
• Out-of-home care data elements:
For the out-of-home care data file, the
2016 final rule required approximately
272 items where we require title IV–E
agencies to report information. In this
NPRM, we propose to reduce these
points to approximately 183,
representing 170 that we propose to
keep from the 2016 final rule and 13 we
propose to modify. This represents
approximately a 33 percent reduction in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
the total items that we propose agencies
to report in this NPRM.
• Number of children receiving
adoption and guardianship assistance:
To determine the number of children for
which title IV–E agencies must report in
the adoption and guardianship
assistance file, ACF used the most
recent title IV–E Programs Quarterly
Financial Report, CB–496, for FY 2016:
456,715 children received title IV–E
adoption assistance and 24,689 children
received guardianship assistance.
• Adoption and guardianship
assistance data elements: There are
approximately 19 items where we
require title IV–E agencies report
information for the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file, which
is not a significant change from the 2016
final rule.
• Systems changes: ACF assumed
that the burden for title IV–E agencies
to modify systems based in part on the
estimates states’ provided in response to
the ANPRM. Additionally, as of July
2018, 29 states and tribes have declared
as moving forward with a new or
transitional Comprehensive Child
Welfare Information Systems (CCWIS)
(see also 45 CFR 1355.50 et seq. for
requirements). ACF recognizes that most
title IV–E agencies will require revisions
to electronic case management systems
to meet the requirements proposed in
this NPRM. As more title IV–E agencies
build CCWIS, ACF anticipates it will
lead to more efficiency in reporting and
less costs and burden associated with
reporting AFCARS data.
• Labor rate: Based on the state
comments to the ANPRM, ACF assumes
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
that there will be a mix of the following
positions working to meet both the onetime and annual requirements of this
proposed rule. We reviewed 2017
Bureau of Labor Statistics data and for
this estimate, we used the job roles of:
Information technology (IT) and
computer programming, administrative,
management, caseworkers, subject
matter experts, and legal staff. For this
estimate, we used the job roles of:
Computer Information and Systems
Managers (11–3021) with an average
hourly wage of $71.99, Computer and
Mathematical Occupations (15–0000)
(e.g., computer and information
analysts, computer programmers, and
database and systems administrators)
with an average hourly wage of $43.18,
Office and Administrative Support
Occupations (43–000) (e.g.,
administrative assistants, data entry,
legal secretaries, government program
eligibility interviewers, information and
record clerks) with an average hourly
wage of $18.24, Social and Community
Service Managers (11–9151) with an
average hourly wage estimate of $33.91,
Community and Social Service
Operations (21–0000) (e.g., Social
Workers, Child and Family Social
Workers, Counselors, Social Service
Specialists) with an average hourly
wage of $23.10, and Paralegals and
Legal Assistants (23–2011) with an
average hourly wage estimate of $25.92.
Thus, ACF averaged these wages to
come to an average labor rate of $36.05.
In order to ensure we took into account
overhead costs associated with these
labor costs, ACF doubled this rate ($72).
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16589
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Calculations for Estimates
We used the information that states
provided in comments to the ANPRM
on the cost and burden associated with
implementing the 2016 final rule as the
basis for these burden estimate
calculations. Thus, for these estimates,
we are using the states’ estimates and
reducing them by 33 percent to
represent the reduction in the workload
associated with reporting the data
proposed in this NPRM. We relied on
this approach because of the type of
data elements that we removed, which
specifically were qualitative in nature
and required a significant amount of
training and staff time to locate the
information and ensure proper data
entry.
Recordkeeping: Adding the bullets
below produces a total of 1,212,163
record keeping hours annually, as
summarized below.
• For the out-of-home care data file,
searching data sources, gathering
information, and entering the
information into the system would take
on average 4.02 hours annually for all
children who enter foster care, for a
total of 1,099,627 hours annually. States
provided estimates that ranged from 3 to
15 hours related to these tasks for the
2016 final rule. The range depended on
whether the work was for the ICWArelated data elements or not. The
average of the hours provided from the
states that broke out this information in
their ANPRM comments was 6 hours
annually. We used the average because
there were not significant outliers in the
comments provided. For the purposes of
this NPRM estimate, we reduced the 6
hours by 33 percent since that
represents the reduction in data
elements to be reported per this NPRM,
which is 4.02 hours. (4.02 hours ×
273,539 children = 1,099,627 annual
hours for this bullet.)
• For the adoption and guardianship
assistance data file, we estimated in the
2016 final rule that updates or changes
on an annual or biennial basis will take
an average of 0.2 hours annually for
records of children who have an
adoption assistance agreement and 0.3
hours annually for children who have a
guardianship assistance agreement. The
data elements in the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file did not
significantly change and we did not
receive information from state estimates
to determine that a change in these
estimates was warranted. As noted
earlier, the number of children in
adoption or guardianship assistance
agreements increased, which reflects the
most recent data available, FY 2016. The
new total annual hours is estimated to
be 98,750. (0.2 hours × 456,715 children
= 91,343 hours. 0.3 hours × 24,689
children = 7,407 hours. 91,343 hours +
7,407 hours = 98,750 total annual
burden hours for this bullet.)
• Developing or modifying standard
operating procedures and IT systems to
collect, validate, and verify the
information and adjust existing ways to
comply with the AFCARS requirements
is estimated at 6,700 hours annually.
States provided estimates in response to
the ANPRM that ranged from 1,000 to
20,000 hours, which varied widely
depending on the size of the state’s outof-home care population, type,
sophistication, and age of systems. To
estimate the annual hours, we chose to
use the median of these estimates
provided by the state commenters,
rather than relying on the average of
those provided in the comments,
because it would be distorted by the
considerable hour range. The median
hours from state’s estimates was 10,000,
and we reduced it by 33 percent since
that represents the reduction in data
elements to be reported per this NPRM,
which is 6,700 hours. Thus, we estimate
6,700 hours annually for this bullet.
(10,000 × 0.67 = 6,700 hours)
Number of
respondents
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Collection—AFCARS
• Administrative tasks associated
with training personnel on the AFCARS
requirements (e.g., reviewing
instructions, developing the training
and manuals) and training personnel on
AFCARS requirements we estimate will
take on average 7,086 hours annually. In
response to the ANPRM, states provided
varying estimates for the hours and cost
of training that were not broken out the
same way. For example, one estimate
was 40 hours to develop training
materials and 2 hours of training per
staff person. Other estimates were only
totals of training hours that ranged
between 42,712 to 102,000 hours
encompassing initial and ongoing
training to implement the 2016 final
rule. Another estimate broke out
ongoing training at 8,500 hours
annually. To estimate the annual hours
related to training tasks, we used the
median of the hours provided from the
ANPRM comments, rather than relying
on the average, because it would be
distorted by the considerable hour
ranges and associated tasks. We
understand that training hours will vary
depending on the size of the agency’s
workforce needing training. The median
hours from state’s estimates was 10,576,
and we reduced it by 33 percent since
that represents the reduction in data
elements to be reported per this NPRM,
which is 7,086 hours. Thus we estimate
7,086 hours annually for this bullet.
(10,576 × 0.67 = 7,086 hours)
Reporting: We estimate that extracting
the information for AFCARS reporting
and transmitting the information to ACF
would take on average 17 hours
annually. Very few states broke out
reporting in their ANPRM comments
and the average of the hours provided
came to 26 hours. Since the NPRM
reduces the data elements by 33 percent,
we reduced the estimated burden
related to reporting that amount. Thus
we estimate 17 hours for this task.
(26 × 0.67 = 17 hours)
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total annual
burden hours
for NPRM
Recordkeeping .................................................................................................
Reporting .........................................................................................................
66
66
2
2
9,183
17
1,212,163
2,244
Total ..........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
1,214,407
Title IV–E agencies must comply with
the current AFCARS requirements in 45
CFR 1355.40 and the appendix to part
1355 until September 30, 2020 (45 CFR
1355.40, per the final rule on
implementation delay published August
21, 2018, 83 FR 42225). On October 1,
2020 (FY 2021), title IV–E agencies must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
comply with the provisions of the 2016
final rule. When this NPRM is finalized,
title IV–E agencies must comply with
the provisions proposed in this NPRM,
which is scheduled to begin on October
1, 2020 (FY 2021), because this NPRM
does not propose to change the
implementation date. Because we
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
anticipate that this NPRM will be
finalized before the 2016 final rule
becomes effective, the year in which
title IV–E agencies will experience
savings from the 2016 final rule is FY
2021. We used fiscal years in this
estimate because AFCARS data
reporting periods are categorized by
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16590
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
fiscal years. The savings is generated by
the reductions proposed in this NPRM,
which reduces the data that title IV–E
agencies must report from what was
published in the 2016 final rule. As
discussed above, we estimate
approximately a 33 percent reduction in
the total items that we propose agencies
to report in this NPRM from the 2016
final rule, as discussed previously.
These charts represent the burden hour
and cost savings we estimate that this
NPRM will have over the 2016 final
rule’s requirements. This NPRM will
save approximately 544,337 burden
hours. After multiplying by the average
wage rate of affected individuals, this
amounts to $39,192,264 in savings each
year relative to the 2016 final rule, in
the year this NPRM (when finalized)
will become effective, FY 2021.
SAVINGS OF NPRM RELATIVE TO 2016 FINAL RULE
Burden hour savings of NPRM
Total annual
burden hours
for 2016
final rule
Total annual
burden hours
for NPRM
Difference
(hours)
FY 2021 .......................................................................................................................................
1,768,744
1,214,407
554,337
In the above estimates, ACF
acknowledges: (1) ACF has used average
figures for title IV–E agencies of very
different sizes and of which, some may
have larger populations of children
served than other agencies, and (2) these
are rough estimates based on the
ANPRM comments in which they
ranged in the level of detail they
provided regarding burden hours, costs,
and work needing to be completed.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
contained in this regulation between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. This does
not affect the deadline for the public to
comment to the Department on the
proposed regulations. Written
comments to OMB or the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, either by fax
to 202–395–6974 or by email to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Please mark
faxes and emails to the attention of the
desk officer for ACF.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
ACF is committed to consulting with
Indian tribes and tribal leadership to the
extent practicable and permitted by law,
prior to promulgating any regulation
that has tribal implications and within
the requirements of E.O. 13175
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments. Section II of
this NPRM provides a summary and
analysis of the ANPRM comments. The
comments to the ANPRM allowed us to
assess whether and how we could
potentially reduce burden on title IV–E
agencies to report AFCARS data, per
E.O. 13777, while still adhering to the
requirements of section 479 of the Act
and collecting useful data that will
inform efforts to improve the child
welfare system. This includes assessing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
the need for ICWA-related data elements
as strongly illustrated by the tribal
commenters. Additionally during the
comment period of the ANPRM, CB
held consultation on May 15 and 16,
2018 where the ANPRM and history of
the AFCARS regulation, including the
Executive Order precipitating another
look at AFCARS, was presented by CB
officials. During this time, tribal leaders,
officials and representatives identified
the ICWA-related information they felt
was important to retain in AFCARS
because it was essential in determining
whether ICWA applied for a child or it
provided basic information on ICWA’s
requirements. Prior to these information
sessions, the ANPRM, 2016 final rule
and other AFCARS supplementary
information was linked to on the CB
website. Additionally, links to the
ANPRM and the AFCARS
supplementary information was emailed
to CB’s tribal lists (on March 13, 2018
when the ANPRM was available for
public inspection and March 15, 2018
when the ANPRM was published), and
CB issued ACYF–CB–IM–18–01 (issued
March 16, 2018). CB also issued ACYF–
CB–IM–18–03 on August 21, 2018
announcing publication of the final rule
regarding implementation of the 2016
final rule and announcing our intent to
issue a NPRM to revise the data
elements per the spring 2018 unified
agenda. This was also emailed to CB’s
tribal lists. Additionally, ACF held a
tribal consultation on November 6, 2017
during which tribes requested that ACF
leave the 2016 final rule in place, stating
that the ICWA-related data elements are
very necessary for accountability. At a
meeting with tribal representatives at
the Secretary’s Tribal Advisory
Committee on May 9 and 10, 2018,
representatives stated the following:
They supported the 2016 final rule,
have concerns that states are not
following ICWA, that the ICWA-related
data elements are critical to informing
Congress, HHS, states, and tribes on
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
how Native children and families are
doing in state child welfare systems and
that AFCARS information would help
inform issues such as foster care
disproportionality.
As we developed this proposed rule,
we carefully considered the comments
to the ANPRM from Indian tribes and
organizations representing tribal
interests, whose comments
unequivocally supported keeping most,
if not all, ICWA-related data elements in
AFCARS. However, we must balance
the need for data with the needs of our
grantees, the title IV–E agencies, that
must revise their systems to meet new
AFCARS requirements and will
ultimately be held accountable via
compliance and penalties to report the
data. We look forward to engaging in
consultation during the comment period
of this NPRM and to receiving
comments on this proposal.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1355
Adoption and foster care, Child
welfare, Grant programs—social
programs.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 93.658, Foster Care
Maintenance; 93.659, Adoption Assistance;
93.645, Child Welfare Services—State
Grants).
Dated: February 5, 2019.
Lynn A. Johnson,
Assistant Secretary for Children and Families.
Approved: February 12, 2019.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, HHS and ACF propose to
amend 45 CFR part 1355 as follows:
PART 1355—GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 1355
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 620 et seq., 42 U.S.C.
670 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 1302.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
2. In § 1355.41, revise paragraphs
(c)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
■
§ 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption and
Foster Care Analysis and Reporting
System.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Terms in §§ 1355.41 through
1355.47 are defined as they appear in
§ 1355.20, except that for purposes of
data elements related to the Indian
Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA),
terms that appear in § 1344.44(b)(3)
through (6), (c)(3) and (4), (e)(10) and
(15), and (h)(4) and (9) are defined as
they appear in 25 CFR 23.2 and 25
U.S.C. 1903.
(2) For state title IV–E agencies only:
If the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘yes’’ to § 1355.44(b)(5)(i), for
§ 1355.44(c)(1) and (2) and (d)(3), the
term ‘‘legal guardian’’ includes an
Indian custodian as defined in ICWA at
25 U.S.C. 1903 if the Indian custodian
has legal responsibility for the child.
■ 3. In § 1355.43, revise paragraph (b)(3)
to read as follows:
§ 1355.43
Data reporting requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) For a child who had an out-ofhome care episode(s) as defined in
§ 1355.42(a) prior to October 1, 2020,
the title IV–E agency must report only
the information for the data described in
§ 1355.44(d)(1) and (g)(1) and (3) for the
out-of-home care episode(s) that
occurred prior to October 1, 2020.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Revise § 1355.44 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1355.44 Out-of-home care data file
elements.
(a) General information—(1) Title IV–
E agency. Indicate the title IV–E agency
responsible for submitting the AFCARS
data in a format according to ACF’s
specifications.
(2) Report date. The report date
corresponds with the end of the report
period. Indicate the last month and the
year of the report period.
(3) Local agency. Indicate the local
county, jurisdiction, or equivalent unit
that has primary responsibility for the
child in a format according to ACF’s
specifications.
(4) Child record number. Indicate the
child’s record number. This is an
encrypted, unique person identification
number that is the same for the child,
no matter where the child lives while in
the placement and care responsibility of
the title IV–E agency in out-of-home
care and across all report periods and
episodes. The title IV–E agency must
apply and retain the same encryption
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
routine or method for the person
identification number across all report
periods. The record number must be
encrypted in accordance with ACF
standards.
(b) Child information—(1) Child’s
date of birth. Indicate the month, day
and year of the child’s birth. If the
actual date of birth is unknown because
the child has been abandoned, provide
an estimated date of birth. Abandoned
means that the child was left alone or
with others and the identity of the
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
unknown and cannot be ascertained.
This includes a child left at a ‘‘safe
haven.’’
(2) Child’s sex. Indicate whether the
child is ‘‘male’’ or ‘‘female.’’
(3) Reason to know a child is an
‘‘Indian Child’’ as defined in the Indian
Child Welfare Act. For state title IV–E
agencies only: Indicate whether the state
title IV–E agency made inquiries
whether the child is an Indian child as
defined in ICWA. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no.’’
(4) Child’s tribal membership. For
state title IV–E agencies only:
(i) Indicate whether the child is a
member of or eligible for membership in
an Indian tribe. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown’’.
(ii) If the state title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes’’ in paragraph (b)(4)(i) of
this section, indicate all federally
recognized Indian tribe(s) that may
potentially be the Indian child’s tribe(s).
The title IV–E agency must submit the
information in a format according to
ACF’s specifications.
(5) Application of ICWA. For state
title IV–E agencies only:
(i) Indicate whether ICWA applies for
the child. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown’’.
(ii) If the state title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes’’ in paragraph (b)(5)(i) of
this section, indicate the date that the
state title IV–E agency was notified by
the Indian tribe or state or tribal court
that ICWA applies.
(6) Notification. For state title IV–E
agencies only: If the state title IV–E
agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(5)(i) of this section, the state title IV–
E agency must indicate whether the
Indian child’s tribe(s) was sent legal
notice in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(a). Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’.
(7) Child’s race. In general, a child’s
race is determined by the child, the
child’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Indicate whether each race category
listed in paragraphs (b)(7)(i) through
(vii) of this section applies with a ‘‘yes’’
or ‘‘no.’’
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16591
Native child has origins in any of the
original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America),
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian child has
origins in any of the original peoples of
the Far East, Southeast Asia or the
Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
child has origins in any of the black
racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander child has origins
in any of the original peoples of Hawaii,
Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race—White. A white child has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race—unknown. The child or
parent or legal guardian does not know,
or is unable to communicate the race, or
at least one race of the child is not
known. This category does not apply
when the child has been abandoned or
the parents failed to return and the
identity of the child, parent(s), or legal
guardian(s) is known.
(vii) Race—abandoned. The child’s
race is unknown because the child has
been abandoned. Abandoned means that
the child was left alone or with others
and the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’
(viii) Race—declined. The child or
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) has
declined to identify a race.
(8) Child’s Hispanic or Latino
ethnicity. In general, a child’s ethnicity
is determined by the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). A child is
of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
child is a person of Cuban, Mexican,
Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) does not
know or is unable to communicate
whether the child is of Hispanic or
Latino ethnicity, indicate ‘‘unknown.’’ If
the child is abandoned indicate
‘‘abandoned.’’ Abandoned means that
the child was left alone or with others
and the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’ If the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) refuses to
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
16592
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
identify the child’s ethnicity, indicate
‘‘declined.’’
(9) Health assessment. Indicate
whether the child had a health
assessment during the current out-ofhome care episode. This assessment
could include an initial health screening
or any follow-up health screening per
section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act.
Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(10) Health, behavioral or mental
health conditions. Indicate whether the
child was diagnosed by a qualified
professional, as defined by the state or
tribe, as having a health, behavioral or
mental health condition, prior to or
during the child’s current out-of-home
care episode as of the last day of the
report period. Indicate ‘‘child has a
diagnosed condition’’ if a qualified
professional has made such a diagnosis
and for each paragraph (b)(10)(i)
through (xi) of this section, indicate
‘‘existing condition,’’ ‘‘previous
condition’’ or ‘‘does not apply,’’ as
applicable. ‘‘Previous condition’’ means
a previous diagnoses that no longer
exists as a current condition. Indicate
‘‘no exam or assessment conducted’’ if
a qualified professional has not
conducted a medical exam or
assessment of the child and leave
paragraphs (b)(10)(i) through (xi) blank.
Indicate ‘‘exam or assessment
conducted and none of the conditions
apply’’ if a qualified professional has
conducted a medical exam or
assessment and has concluded that the
child does not have one of the
conditions listed and leave paragraphs
(b)(10)(i) through (xi) of this section
blank. Indicate ‘‘exam or assessment
conducted but results not received’’ if a
qualified professional has conducted a
medical exam or assessment but the title
IV–E agency has not yet received the
results of such an exam or assessment
and leave paragraphs (b)(10)(i) through
(xi) of this section blank.
(i) Intellectual disability. The child
has, or had previously, significantly
sub-average general cognitive and motor
functioning existing concurrently with
deficits in adaptive behavior manifested
during the developmental period that
adversely affect the child’s socialization
and learning.
(ii) Autism spectrum disorder. The
child has, or had previously, a
neurodevelopment disorder,
characterized by social impairments,
communication difficulties, and
restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped
patterns of behavior. This includes the
range of disorders from autistic
disorder, sometimes called autism or
classical autism spectrum disorder, to
milder forms known as Asperger
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
syndrome and pervasive developmental
disorder not otherwise specified.
(iii) Visual impairment and blindness.
The child has, or had previously, a
visual impairment that may adversely
affects the day-to-day functioning or
educational performance, such as
blindness, amblyopia, or color
blindness.
(iv) Hearing impairment and
deafness. The child has, or had
previously, an impairment in hearing,
whether permanent or fluctuating, that
adversely affects the child’s day-to-day
functioning and educational
performance.
(v) Orthopedic impairment or other
physical condition. The child has, or
had previously, a physical deformity,
such as amputations and fractures or
burns that cause contractures, or an
orthopedic impairment, including
impairments caused by a congenital
anomalies or disease, such as cerebral
palsy, spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, or
muscular dystrophy.
(vi) Mental/emotional disorders. The
child has, or had previously, one or
more mood or personality disorders or
conditions over a long period of time
and to a marked degree, such as conduct
disorder, oppositional defiant disorder,
emotional disturbance, anxiety disorder,
obsessive-compulsive disorder, or eating
disorder.
(vii) Attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder. The child has, or had
previously, a diagnosis of the
neurobehavioral disorders of attention
deficit or hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
or attention deficit disorder (ADD).
(viii) Serious mental disorders. The
child has, or had previously, a diagnosis
of a serious mental disorder or illness,
such as bipolar disorder, depression,
psychotic disorders, or schizophrenia.
(ix) Developmental delay. The child
has been assessed by appropriate
diagnostic instruments and procedures
and is experiencing delays in one or
more of the following areas: Physical
development or motor skills, cognitive
development, communication, language,
or speech development, social or
emotional development, or adaptive
development.
(x) Developmental disability. The
child has, or had previously been
diagnosed with a developmental
disability as defined in the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance
and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (Pub. L.
106–402), section 102(8). This means a
severe, chronic disability of an
individual that is attributable to a
mental or physical impairment or
combination of mental and physical
impairments that manifests before the
age of 22, is likely to continue
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
indefinitely and results in substantial
functional limitations in three or more
areas of major life activity. Areas of
major life activity include: Self-care,
receptive and expressive language,
learning, mobility, self-direction,
capacity for independent living,
economic self-sufficiency, and reflects
the individual’s need for a combination
and sequence of special,
interdisciplinary, or generic services,
individualized supports or other forms
of assistance that are of lifelong or
extended duration and are individually
planned and coordinated. If a child is
given the diagnosis of ‘‘developmental
disability,’’ do not indicate the
individual conditions that form the
basis of this diagnosis separately in
other data elements.
(xi) Other diagnosed condition. The
child has, or had previously, a
diagnosed condition or other health
impairment other than those described
in paragraphs (b)(10)(i) through (x) of
this section, which requires special
medical care, such as asthma, diabetes,
chronic illnesses, a diagnosis as HIV
positive or AIDS, epilepsy, traumatic
brain injury, other neurological
disorders, speech/language impairment,
learning disability, or substance use
issues.
(11) School enrollment. Indicate
whether the child is a full-time student
at and enrolled in (or in the process of
enrolling in) ‘‘elementary’’ or
‘‘secondary’’ education, or is a full or
part-time student at and enrolled in
‘‘post-secondary education or training’’
or ‘‘college,’’ as of the earlier of the last
day of the report period or the day of
exit for a child exiting out-of-home care
prior to the end of the report period. A
child is still considered enrolled in
school if the child would otherwise be
enrolled in a school that is currently out
of session. An ‘‘elementary or secondary
school student’’ is defined in section
471(a)(30) of the Act as a child that is:
Enrolled (or in the process of enrolling)
in an institution which provides
elementary or secondary education, as
determined under the law of the state or
other jurisdiction in which the
institution is located, instructed in
elementary or secondary education at
home in accordance with a home school
law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which the home is located, in an
independent study elementary or
secondary education program in
accordance with the law of the state or
other jurisdiction in which the program
is located, which is administered by the
local school or school district, or
incapable of attending school on a fulltime basis due to the medical condition
of the child, which incapability is
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
supported by a regularly updated
information in the case plan of the
child. Enrollment in ‘‘post-secondary
education or training’’ refers to full or
part-time enrollment in any postsecondary education or training, other
than an education pursued at a college
or university. Enrollment in ‘‘college’’
refers to a child that is enrolled full or
part-time at a college or university. If
child has not reached compulsory
school age, indicate ‘‘not school-age.’’ If
the child has reached compulsory
school-age, but is not enrolled or is in
the process of enrolling in any school
setting full-time, indicate ‘‘not
enrolled.’’
(12) Educational level. Indicate the
highest educational level from
kindergarten to college or postsecondary education/training completed
by the child as of the last day of the
report period. If child has not reached
compulsory school-age, indicate ‘‘not
school-age.’’ Indicate ‘‘kindergarten’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 1st grade. Indicate ‘‘1st grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 2nd grade. Indicate ‘‘2nd grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 3rd grade. Indicate ‘‘3rd grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 4th grade. Indicate ‘‘4th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 5th grade. Indicate ‘‘5th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 6th grade. Indicate ‘‘6th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 7th grade. Indicate ‘‘7th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 8th grade. Indicate ‘‘8th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 9th grade. Indicate ‘‘9th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 10th grade. Indicate ‘‘10th grade’’
if the child is currently in or about to
begin 11th grade. Indicate ‘‘11th grade’’
if the child is currently in or about to
begin 12th grade. Indicate ‘‘12th grade’’
if the child has graduated from high
school. Indicate ‘‘GED’’ if the child has
completed a general equivalency degree
or other high school equivalent. Indicate
‘‘Post-secondary education or training’’
if the child has completed any postsecondary education or training,
including vocational training, other than
an education pursued at a college or
university. Indicate ‘‘College’’ if the
child has completed at least a semester
of study at a college or university.
(13) Pregnant or parenting. (i) Indicate
whether the child is pregnant as of the
end of the report period. Indicate ‘‘yes’’
or ‘‘no.’’
(ii) Indicate whether the child has
ever fathered or bore a child. Indicate
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
(iii) Indicate whether the child and
his/her child(ren) are placed together at
any point during the report period, if
the response in paragraph (b)(13)(ii) of
this section is ‘‘yes.’’ Indicate ‘‘yes,’’
‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘not applicable’’ if the
response in paragraph (b)(13)(ii) of this
section is ‘‘no.’’
(14) Special education. Indicate
whether the child has an Individualized
Education Program (IEP) as defined in
section 614(d)(1) of Part B of Title I of
the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) and implementing
regulations, or an Individualized Family
Service Program (IFSP) as defined in
section 636 of Part C of Title I of IDEA
and implementing regulations, as of the
end of the report period. Indicate ‘‘yes’’
if the child has either an IEP or an IFSP
or ‘‘no’’ if the child has neither.
(15) Prior adoption. Indicate whether
the child experienced a prior legal
adoption before the current out-of-home
care episode. Include any public,
private or independent adoption in the
United States or adoption in another
country and tribal customary adoptions.
Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no’’ or ‘‘abandoned’’ if
the information is unknown because the
child has been abandoned. Abandoned
means that the child was left alone or
with others and the identity of the
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
unknown and cannot be ascertained.
This includes a child left at a ‘‘safe
haven.’’ If the child has experienced a
prior legal adoption, the title IV–E
agency must complete paragraphs
(b)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave those paragraphs blank.
(i) Prior adoption date. Indicate the
month and year that the most recent
prior adoption was finalized. In the case
of a prior intercountry adoption where
the adoptive parent(s) readopted the
child in the United States, the title IV–
E agency must provide the date of the
adoption (either the original adoption in
the home country or the re-adoption in
the United States) that is considered
final in accordance with applicable
laws.
(ii) Prior adoption intercountry.
Indicate whether the child’s most recent
prior adoption was an intercountry
adoption, meaning that the child’s prior
adoption occurred in another country or
the child was brought into the United
States for the purposes of finalizing the
prior adoption. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(16)(i) Prior guardianship. Indicate
whether the child experienced a prior
legal guardianship before the current
out-of-home care episode. Include any
public, private or independent
guardianship(s) in the United States that
meets the definition in section 475(d) of
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16593
the Act. This includes any judicially
created relationship between a child
and caretaker which is intended to be
permanent and self-sustaining as
evidenced by the transfer to the
caretaker of the following parental rights
with respect to the child: Protection,
education, care and control, custody,
and decision making. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’
‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘abandoned’’ if the information
is unknown because the child has been
abandoned. Abandoned means that the
child was left alone or with others and
the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’ If the child has
experienced a prior legal guardianship,
the title IV–E agency must complete
paragraph (b)(16)(ii) of this section;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave it blank.
(ii) Prior guardianship date. Indicate
the month and year that the most recent
prior guardianship became legalized.
(17) Child financial and medical
assistance. Indicate whether the child
received financial and medical
assistance at any point during the sixmonth report period. Indicate ‘‘child has
received support/assistance’’ if the child
was the recipient of such assistance
during the report period, and indicate
which of the following sources of
support described in paragraphs
(b)(17)(i) through (viii) of this section
‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not apply.’’ Indicate
‘‘no support/assistance received’’ if
none of these apply.
(i) State/Tribal adoption assistance.
The child is receiving an adoption
subsidy or other adoption assistance
paid for solely by the state or Indian
tribe.
(ii) State/Tribal foster care. The child
is receiving a foster care payment that
is solely funded by the state or Indian
tribe.
(iii) Title IV–E adoption subsidy. The
child is determined eligible for a title
IV–E adoption assistance subsidy.
(iv) Title IV–E guardianship
assistance. The child is determined
eligible for a title IV–E guardianship
assistance subsidy.
(v) Title IV–A TANF. The child is
living with relatives who are receiving
a Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF) cash assistance
payment on behalf of the child.
(vi) Title IV–B. The child’s living
arrangement is supported by funds
under title IV–B of the Act.
(vii) Chafee Foster Care Independence
Program. The child is living
independently and is supported by
funds under the John F. Chafee Foster
Care Independence Program.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
16594
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(viii) Other. The child is receiving
financial support from another source
not previously listed in paragraphs
(b)(17)(i) through (vii) of this section.
(18) Title IV–E foster care during
report period. Indicate whether a title
IV–E foster care maintenance payment
was paid on behalf of the child at any
point during the report period that is
claimed under title IV–E foster care with
a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no,’’ as appropriate. Indicate
‘‘yes’’ if the child has met all eligibility
requirements of section 472(a) of the Act
and the title IV–E agency has claimed,
or intends to claim, federal
reimbursement for foster care
maintenance payments made on the
child’s behalf during the report period.
(19) Total number of siblings. Indicate
the total number of siblings of the child.
A sibling to the child is his or her
brother or sister by biological, legal, or
marital connection. Do not include the
child who is subject of this record in the
total number. If the child does not have
any siblings, the title IV–E agency must
indicate ‘‘0.’’ If the title IV–E agency
indicates ‘‘0,’’ the title IV–E agency
must leave paragraphs (b)(20) and (21)
of this section blank.
(20) Siblings in foster care. Indicate
the number of siblings of the child who
are in foster care as defined in
§ 1355.20. A sibling to the child is his
or her brother or sister by biological,
legal, or marital connection. Do not
include the child who is subject of this
record in the total number. If the child
does not have any siblings, the title IV–
E agency must leave this paragraph
blank. If the child has siblings, but they
are not in foster care as defined in
§ 1355.20, the title IV–E agency must
indicate ‘‘0.’’ If the title IV–E agency
reported ‘‘0,’’ leave paragraph (b)(21) of
this section blank.
(21) Siblings in living arrangement.
Indicate the number of siblings of the
child who are in the same living
arrangement as the child, on the last day
of the report period. A sibling to the
child is his or her brother or sister by
biological, legal, or marital connection.
Do not include the child who is subject
of this record in the total number. If the
child does not have any siblings, the
title IV–E agency must leave this
paragraph blank. If the child has
siblings, but they are not in the same
living arrangement as the child, the title
IV–E agency must indicate ‘‘0.’’
(c) Parent or legal guardian
information—(1) Year of birth of first
parent or legal guardian. If applicable,
indicate the year of birth of the first
parent (biological, legal or adoptive) or
legal guardian of the child. To the extent
that a child has both a parent and a legal
guardian, or two different sets of legal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
parents, the title IV–E agency must
report on those who had legal
responsibility for the child. We are not
seeking information on putative
parent(s) in this paragraph. If there is
only one parent or legal guardian of the
child, that person’s year of birth must be
reported here. If the child was
abandoned indicate ‘‘abandoned.’’
Abandoned means that the child was
left alone or with others and the identity
of the child’s parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’
(2) Year of birth of second parent or
legal guardian. If applicable, indicate
the year of birth of the second parent
(biological, legal or adoptive) or legal
guardian of the child. We are not
seeking information on putative
parent(s) in this paragraph. If the child
was abandoned, indicate ‘‘abandoned.’’
Abandoned means that the child was
left alone or with others and the identity
of the child’s parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’ Indicate ‘‘not
applicable’’ if there is not another
parent or legal guardian.
(3) Tribal membership mother. For
state title IV–E agencies only: Indicate
whether the biological or adoptive
mother is a member of an Indian tribe.
Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘unknown.’’
(4) Tribal membership father. For
state title IV–E agencies only: Indicate
whether the biological or adoptive
father is a member of an Indian tribe.
Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘unknown.’’
(5) Termination/modification of
parental rights. Indicate whether the
termination/modification of parental
rights for each parent (biological, legal
and/or putative) was voluntary or
involuntary. Voluntary means the
parent voluntary relinquished their
parental rights to the title IV–E agency,
with or without court involvement.
Indicate ‘‘voluntary’’ or ‘‘involuntary.’’
Indicate ‘‘not applicable’’ if there was
no termination/modification and leave
paragraphs (c)(5)(i) and (ii) of this
section blank.
(i) Termination/modification of
parental rights petition. Indicate the
month, day and year that each petition
to terminate/modify the parental rights
of a biological, legal and/or putative
parent was filed in court, if applicable.
Indicate ‘‘deceased’’ if the parent is
deceased.
(ii) Termination/modification of
parental rights. Enter the month, day
and year that the parental rights were
voluntarily or involuntarily terminated/
modified, for each biological, legal and/
or putative parent, if applicable. If the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
parent is deceased, enter the date of
death.
(d) Removal information—(1) Date of
child’s removal. Indicate the removal
date(s) in month, day and year format
for each removal of a child who enters
the placement and care responsibility of
the title IV–E agency. For a child who
is removed and is placed initially in
foster care, indicate the date that the
title IV–E agency received placement
and care responsibility. For a child who
ran away or whose whereabouts are
unknown at the time the child is
removed and is placed in the placement
and care responsibility of the title IV–
E agency, indicate the date that the title
IV–E agency received placement and
care responsibility. For a child who is
removed and is placed initially in a
non-foster care setting, indicate the date
that the child enters foster care as the
date of removal.
(2) Removal transaction date. A nonmodifiable, computer-generated date
which accurately indicates the month,
day and year each response to paragraph
(d)(1) of this section was entered into
the information system.
(3) Environment at removal. Indicate
the type of environment (household or
facility) the child was living in at the
time of each removal for each removal
reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. Indicate ‘‘parent household’’ if
the child was living in a household that
included one or both of the child’s
parents, whether biological, adoptive or
legal. Indicate ‘‘relative household’’ if
the child was living with a relative(s),
the relative(s) is not the child’s legal
guardian and neither of the child’s
parents were living in the household.
Indicate ‘‘legal guardian household’’ if
the child was living with a legal
guardian(s), the guardian(s) is not the
child’s relative and neither of the child’s
parents were living in the household.
Indicate ‘‘relative legal guardian
household’’ if the child was living with
a relative(s) who is also the child’s legal
guardian. Indicate ‘‘justice facility’’ if
the child was in a detention center, jail
or other similar setting where the child
was detained. Indicate ‘‘medical/mental
health facility’’ if the child was living in
a facility such as a medical or
psychiatric hospital or residential
treatment center. Indicate ‘‘other’’ if the
child was living in another situation not
so described, such as living
independently or homeless.
(4) Child and family circumstances at
removal. Indicate all child and family
circumstances that were present at the
time of the child’s removal and/or
related to the child being placed into
foster care for each removal reported in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section. Indicate
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
whether each circumstance described in
paragraphs (d)(4)(i) through (xxxiv) of
this section ‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not
apply’’ for each removal indicated in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(i) Runaway. The child has left,
without authorization, the home or
facility where the child was residing.
(ii) Whereabouts unknown. The
child’s whereabouts are unknown and
the title IV–E agency does not consider
the child to have run away.
(iii) Physical abuse. Alleged or
substantiated physical abuse, injury or
maltreatment of the child by a person
responsible for the child’s welfare.
(iv) Sexual abuse. Alleged or
substantiated sexual abuse or
exploitation of the child by a person
who is responsible for the child’s
welfare.
(v) Psychological or emotional abuse.
Alleged or substantiated psychological
or emotional abuse, including verbal
abuse, of the child by a person who is
responsible for the child’s welfare.
(vi) Neglect. Alleged or substantiated
negligent treatment or maltreatment of
the child, including failure to provide
adequate food, clothing, shelter,
supervision or care by a person who is
responsible for the child’s welfare.
(vii) Medical neglect. Alleged or
substantiated medical neglect caused by
a failure to provide for the appropriate
health care of the child by a person who
is responsible for the child’s welfare,
although the person was financially able
to do so, or was offered financial or
other means to do so.
(viii) Domestic violence. Alleged or
substantiated violent act(s), including
any forceful detention of an individual
that results in, threatens to result in, or
attempts to cause physical injury or
mental harm. This is committed by a
person against another individual
residing in the child’s home and with
whom such person is in an intimate
relationship, dating relationship, is or
was related by marriage, or has a child
in common. This circumstance includes
domestic violence between the child
and his or her partner and applies to a
child or youth of any age (including
those younger and older than the age of
majority. This does not include alleged
or substantiated maltreatment of the
child by a person who is responsible for
the child’s welfare.
(ix) Abandonment. The child was left
alone or with others and the parent or
legal guardian’s identity is unknown
and cannot be ascertained. This does
not include a child left at a ‘‘safe haven’’
as defined by the title IV–E agency. This
category does not apply when the
identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is known.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
(x) Failure to return. The parent, legal
guardian or caretaker did not or has not
returned for the child or made his or her
whereabouts known. This category does
not apply when the identity of the
parent, legal guardian or caretaker is
unknown.
(xi) Caretaker’s alcohol use. A parent,
legal guardian or other caretaker
responsible for the child uses alcohol
compulsively that is not of a temporary
nature.
(xii) Caretaker’s drug use. A parent,
legal guardian or other caretaker
responsible for the child uses drugs
compulsively that is not of a temporary
nature.
(xiii) Child alcohol use. The child
uses alcohol.
(xiv) Child drug use. The child uses
drugs.
(xv) Prenatal alcohol exposure. The
child has been identified as prenatally
exposed to alcohol, resulting in fetal
alcohol spectrum disorders such as fetal
alcohol exposure, fetal alcohol effect or
fetal alcohol syndrome.
(xvi) Prenatal drug exposure. The
child has been identified as prenatally
exposed to drugs.
(xvii) Diagnosed condition. The child
has a clinical diagnosis by a qualified
professional of a health, behavioral or
mental health condition, such as one or
more of the following: Intellectual
disability, emotional disturbance,
specific learning disability, hearing,
speech or sight impairment, physical
disability or other clinically diagnosed
condition.
(xviii) Inadequate access to mental
health services. The child and/or child’s
family has inadequate resources to
access the necessary mental health
services outside of the child’s out-ofhome care placement.
(xix) Inadequate access to medical
services. The child and/or child’s family
has inadequate resources to access the
necessary medical services outside of
the child’s out-of-home care placement.
(xx) Child behavior problem. The
child’s behavior in his or her school
and/or community adversely affects his
or her socialization, learning, growth
and/or moral development. This
includes all child behavior problems, as
well as adjudicated and non-adjudicated
status or delinquency offenses and
convictions.
(xxi) Death of caretaker. Existing
family stress in caring for the child or
an inability to care for the child due to
the death of a parent, legal guardian or
other caretaker.
(xxii) Incarceration of caretaker. The
child’s parent, legal guardian or
caretaker is temporarily or permanently
placed in jail or prison which adversely
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16595
affects his or her ability to care for the
child.
(xxiii) Caretaker’s significant
impairment—physical/emotional. A
physical or emotional illness or
disabling condition of the child’s
parent, legal guardian or caretaker that
adversely limits his or her ability to care
for the child.
(xxiv) Caretaker’s significant
impairment—cognitive. The child’s
parent, legal guardian or caretaker has
cognitive limitations that impact his or
her ability to function in areas of daily
life, which adversely affect his or her
ability to care for the child. It also may
be characterized by a significantly
below-average score on a test of mental
ability or intelligence.
(xxv) Inadequate housing. The child’s
or his or her family’s housing is
substandard, overcrowded, unsafe or
otherwise inadequate which results in it
being inappropriate for the child to
reside.
(xxvi) Voluntary relinquishment for
adoption. The child’s parent has
voluntarily relinquished the child by
assigning the physical and legal custody
of the child to the title IV–E agency, in
writing, for the purpose of having the
child adopted. This includes a child left
at a ‘‘safe haven’’ as defined by the title
IV–E agency.
(xxvii) Child requested placement.
The child, age 18 or older, has requested
placement into foster care.
(xxviii) Sex trafficking. The child is a
victim of sex trafficking at the time of
removal.
(xxix) Parental immigration
detainment or deportation. The parent
is or was detained or deported by
immigration officials.
(xxx) Family conflict related to child’s
sexual orientation, gender identity, or
gender expression. There is family
conflict related to the child’s expressed
or perceived sexual orientation, gender
identity, or gender expression. This
includes any conflict related to the ways
in which a child manifests masculinity
or femininity.
(xxxi) Educational neglect. Alleged or
substantiated failure of a parent or
caregiver to enroll a child of mandatory
school age in school or provide
appropriate home schooling or needed
special educational training, thus
allowing the child or youth to engage in
chronic truancy.
(xxxii) Public agency title IV–E
agreement. The child is in the
placement and care responsibility of
another public agency that has an
agreement with the title IV–E agency
pursuant to section 472(a)(2)(B) of the
Act and on whose behalf title IV–E
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
16596
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
foster care maintenance payments are
made.
(xxxiii) Tribal title IV–E agreement.
The child is in the placement and care
responsibility of an Indian tribe, tribal
organization or consortium with which
the title IV–E agency has an agreement
and on whose behalf title IV–E foster
care maintenance payments are made.
(xxxiv) Homelessness. The child or
his or her family has no regular or
adequate place to live. This includes
living in a car, or on the street, or
staying in a homeless or other
temporary shelter.
(5) Victim of sex trafficking prior to
entering foster care. Indicate whether
the child had been a victim of sex
trafficking before the current out-ofhome care episode. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the
child was a victim or ‘‘no’’ if the child
had not been a victim.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ in
paragraph (d)(5) introductory text of this
section, indicate whether the title IV–E
agency made a report to law
enforcement for entry into the National
Crime Information Center (NCIC)
database. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the agency
made a report to law enforcement and
indicate ‘‘no’’ if the agency did not
make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes’’ in paragraph (d)(5)(i) of
this section, indicate the date that the
agency made the report to law
enforcement.
(6) Victim of sex trafficking while in
foster care. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the child
was a victim of sex trafficking while in
out-of-home care during the current outof-home care episode. Indicate ‘‘no’’ if
the child was not a victim of sex
trafficking during the current out-ofhome care episode.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ in this
paragraph (d)(6) of this section, indicate
whether the agency made a report to law
enforcement for entry into the NCIC
database. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the title IV–
E agency made a report(s) to law
enforcement and indicate ‘‘no’’ if the
title IV–E agency did not make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes’’ in paragraph (d)(6)(i) of
this section, indicate the date(s) the
agency made the report(s) to law
enforcement.
(e) Living arrangement and provider
information—(1) Date of living
arrangement. Indicate the month, day
and year representing the first date of
placement in each of the child’s living
arrangements for each out-of-home care
episode. In the case of a child who has
run away, whose whereabouts are
unknown, or who is already in a living
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
arrangement and remains there when
the title IV–E agency receives placement
and care responsibility, indicate the
date of the VPA or court order providing
the title IV–E agency with placement
and care responsibility for the child,
rather than the date when the child was
originally placed in the living
arrangement.
(2) Foster family home. Indicate
whether each of the child’s living
arrangements is a foster family home,
with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ as appropriate. If
the child has run away or the child’s
whereabouts are unknown, indicate
‘‘no.’’ If the title IV–E agency indicates
that the child is living in a foster family
home, by indicating ‘‘yes,’’ the title IV–
E agency must complete paragraph (e)(3)
of this section. If the title IV–E agency
indicates ‘‘no,’’ the title IV–E agency
must complete paragraph (e)(4) of this
section.
(3) Foster family home type. If the title
IV–E agency indicated that the child is
living in a foster family home in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section, indicate
whether each foster family home type
listed in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through (vi)
of this section applies or does not apply;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave this paragraph (e)(3) blank.
(i) Licensed home. The child’s living
arrangement is licensed or approved by
the state or tribal licensing/approval
authority.
(ii) Therapeutic foster family home.
The home provides specialized care and
services.
(iii) Shelter care foster family home.
The home is so designated by the state
or tribal licensing/approval authority,
and is designed to provide short-term or
transitional care.
(iv) Relative foster family home. The
foster parent(s) is related to the child by
biological, legal or marital connection
and the relative foster parent(s) lives in
the home as his or her primary
residence.
(v) Pre-adoptive home. The home is
one in which the family and the title
IV–E agency have agreed on a plan to
adopt the child.
(vi) Kin foster family home. The home
is one in which there is a kin
relationship as defined by the title IV–
E agency, such as one where there is a
psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the
child’s family and the foster parent(s)
and there is not a legal, biological, or
marital connection between the child
and foster parent.
(4) Other living arrangement type. If
the title IV–E agency indicated that the
child’s living arrangement is other than
a foster family home in paragraph (e)(2)
of this section, indicate the type of
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
setting; otherwise the title IV–E agency
must leave this paragraph blank.
Indicate ‘‘group home-family operated’’
if the child is in a group home that
provides 24-hour care in a private
family home where the family members
are the primary caregivers. Indicate
‘‘group home-staff operated’’ if the child
is in a group home that provides 24hour care for children where the caregiving is provided by shift or rotating
staff. Indicate ‘‘group home-shelter
care’’ if the child is in a group home that
provides 24-hour care which is shortterm or transitional in nature, and is
designated by the state or tribal
licensing/approval authority to provide
shelter care. Indicate ‘‘residential
treatment center’’ if the child is in a
facility that has the purpose of treating
children with mental health or
behavioral conditions or if the child is
placed with a parent who is in a
licensed residential family-based
treatment facility for substance abuse
per section 472(j) of the Act. This does
not include a qualified residential
treatment program defined in section
472(k)(4) of the Act. Indicate ‘‘qualified
residential treatment program’’ if the
child is in a placement that meets all of
the requirements of section 472(k)(2)(A)
and (4) of the Act. Indicate ‘‘child care
institution’’ if the child is in a private
child care institution, or a public child
care institution which accommodates no
more than 25 children, and is licensed
by the state or tribal authority
responsible for licensing or approving
child care institutions. This includes a
setting specializing in providing
prenatal, post-partum, or parenting
supports for youth per section
472(k)(2)(B) of the Act, and a setting
providing high-quality residential care
and supportive services to children and
youth who have been found to be, or are
at risk of becoming, sex trafficking
victims per section 472(k)(2)(D) of the
Act. This does not include detention
facilities, forestry camps, training
schools or any other facility operated
primarily for the detention of children
who are determined to be delinquent.
Indicate ‘‘child care institution-shelter
care’’ if the child is in a child care
institution and the institution is
designated to provide shelter care by the
state or tribal authority responsible for
licensing or approving child care
institutions and is short-term or
transitional in nature. Indicate
‘‘supervised independent living’’ if the
child is living independently in a
supervised setting. Indicate ‘‘juvenile
justice facility’’ if the child is in a secure
facility or institution where alleged or
adjudicated juvenile delinquents are
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
housed. Indicate ‘‘medical or
rehabilitative facility’’ if the child is in
a facility where an individual receives
medical or physical health care, such as
a hospital. Indicate ‘‘psychiatric
hospital’’ if the child is in a facility that
provides emotional or psychological
health care and is licensed or accredited
as a hospital. Indicate ‘‘runaway’’ if the
child has left, without authorization, the
home or facility where the child was
placed. Indicate ‘‘whereabouts
unknown’’ if the child is not in the
physical custody of the title IV–E
agency or person or institution with
whom the child has been placed, the
child’s whereabouts are unknown and
the title IV–E agency does not consider
the child to have run away. Indicate
‘‘placed at home’’ if the child is home
with the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) in
preparation for the title IV–E agency to
return the child home permanently.
(5) Location of living arrangement.
Indicate whether each of the child’s
living arrangements reported in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section is located
within or outside of the reporting state
or tribal service area or is outside of the
country. Indicate ‘‘out-of-state or out-oftribal service area’’ if the child’s living
arrangement is located outside of the
reporting state or tribal service area but
inside the United States. Indicate ‘‘instate or in-tribal service area’’ if the
child’s living arrangement is located
within the reporting state or tribal
service area. Indicate ‘‘out-of-country’’ if
the child’s living arrangement is outside
of the United States. Indicate ‘‘runaway
or whereabouts unknown’’ if the child
has run away from his or her living
arrangement or the child’s whereabouts
are unknown. If the title IV–E agency
indicates either ‘‘out-of-state or out-oftribal service area’’ or ‘‘out-of-country’’
for the child’s living arrangement, the
title IV–E agency must complete
paragraph (e)(6) of this section;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave paragraph (e)(6) of this section
blank.
(6) Jurisdiction or country where child
is living. Indicate the state, tribal service
area, Indian reservation, or country
where the reporting title IV–E agency
placed the child for each living
arrangement, if the title IV–E agency
indicated either ‘‘out-of-state’’ or ‘‘outof-tribal service area’’ or ‘‘out-ofcountry’’ in paragraph (e)(5) of this
section; otherwise the title IV–E agency
must leave paragraph (e)(6) of this
section blank. The title IV–E agency
must report the information in a format
according to ACF’s specifications.
(7) Marital status of the foster
parent(s). Indicate the marital status of
the child’s foster parent(s) for each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
foster family home living arrangement
in which the child is placed, as
indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this
section. Indicate ‘‘married couple’’ if the
foster parents are considered united in
matrimony according to applicable
laws. Include common law marriage,
where provided by applicable laws.
Indicate ‘‘unmarried couple’’ if the
foster parents are living together as a
couple, but are not united in matrimony
according to applicable laws. Indicate
‘‘separated’’ if the foster parent is legally
separated or is living apart from his or
her spouse. Indicate ‘‘single adult’’ if the
foster parent is not married and is not
living with another individual as part of
a couple. If the response is either
‘‘married couple’’ or ‘‘unmarried
couple,’’ the title IV–E agency must
complete the paragraphs for the second
foster parent in paragraphs (e)(14)
through (18) of this section; otherwise
the title IV–E agency must leave those
paragraphs blank.
(8) Child’s relationships to the foster
parent(s). Indicate the type of
relationship between the child and his
or her foster parent(s), for each foster
family home living arrangement in
which the child is placed, as indicated
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
Indicate ‘‘relative(s)’’ if the foster
parent(s) is the child’s relative (by
biological, legal or marital connection).
Indicate ‘‘non-relative(s)’’ if the foster
parent(s) is not related to the child (by
biological, legal or marital connection).
Indicate ‘‘kin’’ if the foster parent(s) has
kin relationship to the child as defined
by the title IV–E agency, such as one
where there is a psychological, cultural
or emotional relationship between the
child or the child’s family and the foster
parent(s) and there is not a legal,
biological, or marital connection
between the child and foster parent.
(9) Year of birth for first foster parent.
Indicate the year of birth for the first
foster parent for each foster family home
living arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section.
(10) First foster parent tribal
membership. For state title IV–E
agencies only: Indicate whether the first
foster parent is a member of an Indian
tribe. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown.’’
(11) Race of first foster parent.
Indicate the race of the first foster parent
for each foster family home living
arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section. In general, an
individual’s race is determined by the
individual. Indicate whether each race
category listed in paragraphs (e)(11)(i)
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16597
through (vii) of this section applies with
a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America)
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—unknown. The foster
parent does not know his or her race, or
at least one race.
(vii) Race—declined. The first foster
parent has declined to identify a race.
(12) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of
first foster parent. Indicate the Hispanic
or Latino ethnicity of the first foster
parent for each foster family home
living arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section. In general, an
individual’s ethnicity is determined by
the individual. An individual is of
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban,
Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the first foster parent
does not know his or her ethnicity
indicate ‘‘unknown.’’ If the individual
refuses to identify his or her ethnicity,
indicate ‘‘declined.’’
(13) Sex of first foster parent. Indicate
whether the first foster parent is
‘‘female’’ or ‘‘male.’’
(14) Year of birth for second foster
parent. Indicate the birth year of the
second foster parent for each foster
family home living arrangement in
which the child is placed, as indicated
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, if
applicable. The title IV–E agency must
leave this paragraph blank if there is no
second foster parent according to
paragraph (e)(7) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
16598
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(15) Second foster parent tribal
membership. For state title IV–E
agencies only: Indicate whether the
second foster parent is a member of an
Indian tribe. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown.’’
(16) Race of second foster parent.
Indicate the race of the second foster
parent for each foster family home
living arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section, if applicable. In general,
an individual’s race is determined by
the individual. Indicate whether each
race category listed in paragraphs
(e)(16)(i) through (vii) of this section
applies with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ The title
IV–E agency must leave this paragraph
blank if there is no second foster parent
according to paragraph (e)(7) of this
section.
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America)
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—unknown. The second
foster parent does not know his or her
race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race—declined. The second
foster parent has declined to identify a
race.
(17) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of
second foster parent. Indicate the
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the
second foster parent for each foster
family home living arrangement in
which the child is placed, as indicated
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, if
applicable. In general, an individual’s
ethnicity is determined by the
individual. An individual is of Hispanic
or Latino ethnicity if the individual is
a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto
Rican, South or Central American or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
other Spanish culture or origin,
regardless of race. Indicate whether this
category applies with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
If the second foster parent does not
know his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘unknown.’’ If the individual refuses to
identify his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘declined.’’ The title IV–E agency must
leave this paragraph blank if there is no
second foster parent according to
paragraph (e)(7) of this section.
(18) Sex of second foster parent.
Indicate whether the second foster
parent is ‘‘female’’ or ‘‘male.’’
(f) Permanency planning—(1)
Permanency plan. Indicate each
permanency plan established for the
child. Indicate ‘‘reunify with parent(s)
or legal guardian(s)’’ if the plan is to
keep the child in out-of-home care for
a limited time and the title IV–E agency
is to work with the child’s parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) to establish a stable
family environment. Indicate ‘‘live with
other relatives’’ if the plan is for the
child to live permanently with a
relative(s) (by biological, legal or marital
connection) who is not the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate
‘‘adoption’’ if the plan is to facilitate the
child’s adoption by relatives, foster
parents, kin or other unrelated
individuals. Indicate ‘‘guardianship’’ if
the plan is to establish a new legal
guardianship. Indicate ‘‘planned
permanent living arrangement’’ if the
plan is for the child to remain in foster
care until the title IV–E agency’s
placement and care responsibility ends.
The title IV–E agency must only select
‘‘planned permanent living
arrangement’’ consistent with the
requirements in section 475(5)(C)(i) of
the Act. Indicate ‘‘permanency plan not
established’’ if a permanency plan has
not yet been established.
(2) Date of permanency plan. Indicate
the month, day and year that each
permanency plan(s) was established
during each out-of-home care episode.
(3) Date of periodic review. Enter the
month, day and year of each periodic
review, either by a court or by
administrative review (as defined in
section 475(6) of the Act) that meets the
requirements of section 475(5)(B) of the
Act.
(4) Date of permanency hearing. Enter
the month, day and year of each
permanency hearing held by a court or
an administrative body appointed or
approved by the court that meets the
requirements of section 475(5)(C) of the
Act.
(5) Caseworker visit dates. Enter each
date in which a caseworker had an inperson, face-to-face visit with the child
consistent with section 422(b)(17) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Act. Indicate the month, day and year of
each visit.
(6) Caseworker visit location. Indicate
the location of each in-person, face-toface visit between the caseworker and
the child. Indicate ‘‘child’s residence’’ if
the visit occurred at the location where
the child is currently residing, such as
the current foster care provider’s home,
child care institution or facility. Indicate
‘‘other location’’ if the visit occurred at
any location other than where the child
currently resides, such as the child’s
school, a court, a child welfare office or
in the larger community.
(g) General exit information. Provide
exit information for each out-of-home
care episode. An exit occurs when the
title IV–E agency’s placement and care
responsibility of the child ends.
(1) Date of exit. Indicate the month,
day and year for each of the child’s exits
from out-of-home care. An exit occurs
when the title IV–E agency’s placement
and care responsibility of the child
ends. If the child has not exited out-ofhome care the title IV–E agency must
leave this paragraph blank. If this
paragraph is applicable, paragraphs
(g)(2) and (3) of this section must have
a response.
(2) Exit transaction date. A nonmodifiable, computer-generated date
which accurately indicates the month,
day and year each response to paragraph
(g)(1) of this section was entered into
the information system.
(3) Exit reason. Indicate the reason for
each of the child’s exits from out-ofhome care. Indicate ‘‘not applicable’’ if
the child has not exited out-of-home
care. Indicate ‘‘reunify with parent(s)/
legal guardian(s)’’ if the child was
returned to his or her parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) and the title IV–E agency no
longer has placement and care
responsibility. Indicate ‘‘live with other
relatives’’ if the child exited to live with
a relative (related by a biological, legal
or marital connection) other than his or
her parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Indicate ‘‘adoption’’ if the child was
legally adopted. Indicate
‘‘emancipation’’ if the child exited care
due to age. Indicate ‘‘guardianship’’ if
the child exited due to a legal
guardianship of the child. Indicate
‘‘runaway or whereabouts unknown’’ if
the child ran away or the child’s
whereabouts were unknown at the time
that the title IV–E agency’s placement
and care responsibility ends. Indicate
‘‘death of child’’ if the child died while
in out-of-home care. Indicate ‘‘transfer
to another agency’’ if placement and
care responsibility for the child was
transferred to another agency, either
within or outside of the reporting state
or tribal service area.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(4) Transfer to another agency. If the
title IV–E agency indicated the child
was transferred to another agency in
paragraph (g)(3) of this section, indicate
the type of agency that received
placement and care responsibility for
the child from the following options:
‘‘State title IV–E agency,’’ ‘‘Tribal title
IV–E agency,’’ ‘‘Indian tribe or tribal
agency (non-IV–E),’’ ‘‘juvenile justice
agency,’’ ‘‘mental health agency,’’ ‘‘other
public agency’’ or ‘‘private agency.’’
(h) Exit to adoption and guardianship
information. Report information in
paragraph (h) only if the title IV–E
agency indicated the child exited to
adoption or legal guardianship in
paragraph (g)(3) of this section.
Otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave paragraphs (h)(1) through (15) of
this section blank.
(1) Marital status of the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s). Indicate the
marital status of the adoptive parent(s)
or legal guardian(s). Indicate ‘‘married
couple’’ if the adoptive parents or legal
guardians are considered united in
matrimony according to applicable
laws. Include common law marriage,
where provided by applicable laws.
Indicate ‘‘married but individually
adopting or obtaining legal
guardianship’’ if the adoptive parents or
legal guardians are considered united in
matrimony according to applicable
laws, but are individually adopting or
obtaining legal guardianship. Indicate
‘‘separated’’ if the foster parent is legally
separated or is living apart from his or
her spouse. Indicate ‘‘unmarried
couple’’ if the adoptive parents or
guardians are living together as a
couple, but are not united in matrimony
according to applicable laws. Use this
response option even if only one person
of the unmarried couple is the adoptive
parent or legal guardian of the child.
Indicate ‘‘single adult’’ if the adoptive
parent or legal guardian is not married
and is not living with another
individual as part of a couple. If the
response is ‘‘married couple’’ or
‘‘unmarried couple,’’ the title IV–E
agency also must complete paragraphs
for the second adoptive parent or
second legal guardian in paragraphs
(h)(8) through (12) of this section;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave those paragraphs blank.
(2) Child’s relationship to the
adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s).
Indicate the type of relationship
between the child and his or her
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Indicate whether each relationship
listed in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (iv)
of this section ‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not
apply.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
(i) Relative(s). The adoptive parent(s)
or legal guardian(s) is the child’s
relative (by biological, legal or marital
connection).
(ii) Kin. The adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) has a kin relationship
with the child, as defined by the title
IV–E agency, such as one where there is
a psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the
child’s family and the adoptive parent(s)
or legal guardian(s) and there is not a
legal, biological, or marital connection
between the child and foster parent.
(iii) Non-relative(s). The adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is not
related to the child by biological, legal
or marital connection.
(iv) Foster parent(s). The adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) was the
child’s foster parent(s).
(3) Date of birth of first adoptive
parent or guardian. Indicate the month,
day and year of the birth of the first
adoptive parent or legal guardian.
(4) First adoptive parent or guardian
tribal membership. For state title IV–E
agencies only: Indicate whether the first
adoptive parent or guardian is a member
of an Indian tribe. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no’’
or ‘‘unknown.’’
(5) Race of first adoptive parent or
guardian. In general, an individual’s
race is determined by the individual.
Indicate whether each race category
listed in paragraphs (h)(5)(i) through
(vii) of this section applies with a ‘‘yes’’
or ‘‘no.’’
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America),
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—Unknown. The first
adoptive parent or legal guardian does
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
16599
not know his or her race, or at least one
race.
(vii) Race—Declined. The first
adoptive parent, or legal guardian has
declined to identify a race.
(6) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first
adoptive parent or guardian. In general,
an individual’s ethnicity is determined
by the individual. An individual is of
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban,
Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the first adoptive
parent or legal guardian does not know
his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘unknown.’’ If the individual refuses to
identify his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘declined.’’
(7) Sex of first adoptive parent or
guardian. Indicate whether the first
adoptive parent is ‘‘female’’ or ‘‘male.’’
(8) Date of birth of second adoptive
parent, guardian, or other member of
the couple. Indicate the month, day and
year of the date of birth of the second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple. The title IV–E
agency must leave this paragraph blank
if there is no second adoptive parent,
legal guardian, or other member of the
couple according to paragraph (h)(1) of
this section.
(9) Second adoptive parent, guardian,
or other member of the couple tribal
membership. For state title IV–E
agencies only: Indicate whether the
second adoptive parent or guardian is a
member of an Indian tribe. Indicate
‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no’’ or ‘‘unknown.’’
(10) Race of second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the
couple. In general, an individual’s race
is determined by the individual.
Indicate whether each race category
listed in paragraphs (h)(10)(i) through
(vii) of this section applies with a ‘‘yes’’
or ‘‘no.’’ The title IV–E agency must
leave this paragraph blank if there is no
second adoptive parent, legal guardian,
or other member of the couple according
to paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America),
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
16600
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—Unknown. The second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple does not know his
or her race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race—Declined. The second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple has declined to
identify a race.
(11) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of
second adoptive parent, guardian, or
other member of the couple. In general,
an individual’s ethnicity is determined
by the individual. An individual is of
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban,
Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the second adoptive
parent, legal guardian, or other member
of the couple does not know his or her
ethnicity, indicate ‘‘unknown.’’ If the
individual refuses to identify his or her
ethnicity, indicate ‘‘declined.’’ The title
IV–E agency must leave this paragraph
blank if there is no second adoptive
parent, legal guardian, or other member
of the couple according to paragraph
(h)(1) of this section.
(12) Sex of second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the
couple. Indicate whether the second
adoptive parent, guardian, or other
member of the couple is ‘‘female’’ or
‘‘male.’’
(13) Inter/Intrajurisdictional adoption
or guardianship. Indicate whether the
child was placed within the state or
tribal service area, outside of the state or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Apr 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
tribal service area or into another
country for adoption or legal
guardianship. Indicate
‘‘interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’ if the reporting title IV–
E agency placed the child for adoption
or legal guardianship outside of the state
or tribal service area but within the
United States. Indicate ‘‘intercountry
adoption or guardianship’’ if the
reporting title IV–E agency placed the
child for adoption or legal guardianship
outside of the United States. Indicate
‘‘intrajurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’ if the reporting title IV–
E agency placed the child within the
same state or tribal service area as the
one with placing responsibility.
(14) Assistance agreement type.
Indicate the type of assistance
agreement between the title IV–E agency
and the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s): ‘‘Title IV–E adoption
assistance agreement’’; ‘‘State/tribal
adoption assistance agreement’’;
‘‘Adoption-Title IV–E agreement nonrecurring expenses only’’; ‘‘AdoptionTitle IV–E agreement Medicaid only’’;
‘‘Title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement’’; ‘‘State/tribal guardianship
assistance agreement’’; or ‘‘no
agreement’’ if there is no assistance
agreement.
(15) Siblings in adoptive or
guardianship home. Indicate the
number of siblings of the child who are
in the same adoptive or guardianship
home as the child. A sibling to the child
is his or her brother or sister by
biological, legal, or marital connection.
Do not include the child who is subject
of this record in the total number. If the
child does not have any siblings, the
title IV–E agency must indicate ‘‘not
applicable.’’ If the child has siblings, but
they are not in the same adoptive or
guardianship home as the child, the title
IV–E agency must indicate ‘‘0.’’
■ 5. In § 1355.45, revise paragraphs
(b)(2) and (b)(3)(vi) and add paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
§ 1355.45 Adoption and guardianship
assistance data file elements.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00030
*
Fmt 4701
*
Sfmt 9990
(b) * * *
(2) Child’s sex. Indicate ‘‘male’’ or
‘‘female.’’
(3) * * *
(vi) Race—Unknown. The child or
parent or legal guardian does not know
the race, or at least one race of the child
is not known. This category does not
apply when the child has been
abandoned or the parents failed to
return and the identity of the child,
parent(s), or legal guardian(s) is known.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Adoption or guardianship placing
agency. Indicate the agency that placed
the child for adoption or legal
guardianship. Indicate ‘‘title IV–E
agency’’ if the reporting title IV–E
agency placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship. Indicate ‘‘private
agency under agreement’’ if a private
agency placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship through an
agreement with the reporting title IV–E
agency. Indicate ‘‘Indian tribe under
contract/agreement’’ if an Indian tribe,
tribal organization or consortia placed
the child for adoption or legal
guardianship through a contract or an
agreement with the reporting title IV–E
agency.
■ 6. In § 1355.46, revise the second
sentence of paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 1355.46
Compliance.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * * In addition, each record
subject to compliance standards within
the data file must have the data
elements described in §§ 1355.44(a)(1)
through (4), 1355.44(b)(1) and (2), and
1355.45(a) and (b)(1) and (2) be 100
percent free of missing data, invalid
data and internally inconsistent data
(see paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this
section). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–07827 Filed 4–16–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4184–25–P
E:\FR\FM\19APP2.SGM
19APP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16572-16600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07827]
[[Page 16571]]
Vol. 84
Friday,
No. 76
April 19, 2019
Part II
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Administration for Children and Families
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
45 CFR Part 1355
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 84 , No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 16572]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
45 CFR Part 1355
RIN 0970-AC72
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System
AGENCY: Children's Bureau (CB); Administration on Children, Youth and
Families (ACYF); Administration for Children and Families (ACF);
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: ACF proposes to amend the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis
and Reporting System (AFCARS) regulations. This notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) amends the AFCARS regulations that require title IV-E
agencies to collect and report data to ACF on children in out-of-home
care, who exit out-of-home care to adoption or legal guardianship, and
children who are covered by a title IV-E adoption or guardianship
assistance agreement.
DATES: In order to be considered, we must receive written comments on
this NPRM on or before June 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: We encourage the public to submit comments electronically to
ensure they are received in a timely manner. Please be sure to include
identifying information on any correspondence. To download an
electronic version of the proposed rule, please go to https://www.regulations.gov/. You may submit comments, identified by docket
number, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-Mail: [email protected]. Include [docket number
and/or RIN number] in subject line of the message.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting comments, see the ``Public
Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. Comments that concern information collection
requirements must be sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
at the address listed in the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) section of
this preamble. A copy of these comments also may be sent to the HHS
representative listed after the For Further Information Contact
heading.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen McHugh, Director, Policy
Division, Children's Bureau, [email protected]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary per Executive Order 13563
II. Background on AFCARS and Regulation Development
III. Overview of Major Proposed Revisions to Data Elements
IV. Implementation Timeframe
V. Public Participation
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of Regulatory Provisions
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
I. Executive Summary per Executive Order 13563
Executive Order (E.O.) 13563 requires that regulations be
accessible, consistent, written in plain language, and easy to
understand. This means that regulatory preambles for lengthy or complex
rules (both proposed and final) must include executive summaries. Below
is the executive summary for this AFCARS NPRM.
(1) Purpose of the AFCARS NPRM.
(a) The need for the regulatory action and how the action will meet
that need: This NPRM proposes revisions to streamline the AFCARS data
elements that were finalized in the AFCARS final rule published on
December 14, 2016 (81 FR 90524). This action is in response to E.O.
13777 (issued February 24, 2017) that directed federal agencies to
establish a Regulatory Reform Task Force to review existing regulations
and make recommendations regarding their repeal, replacement, or
modification. The HHS Regulatory Reform Task Force identified the
AFCARS regulation as one in which the reporting burden may impose costs
that exceed benefits.
(b) Legal authority for the final rule: Section 479 of the Social
Security Act (the Act) mandates HHS regulate a data collection system
for national adoption and foster care data. Section 474(f) of the Act
requires HHS to impose penalties for non-compliant AFCARS data. Section
1102 of the Act instructs the Secretary to promulgate regulations
necessary for the effective administration of the functions for which
HHS is responsible under the Act.
(2) Summary of the Major Provisions of the NPRM.
(a) Data Elements. We propose to remove and replace the data
elements as described below to reduce the AFCARS reporting burden. We
propose to modify the data elements in the out-of-home care data file
(Sec. 1355.44) that title IV-E agencies must report. In particular, we
propose to streamline data elements related to child information,
placements, and permanency planning based on public comments to the
Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM) and the work of federal
experts with an interest in AFCARS data. We retained all data elements
in the adoption and guardianship assistance data file (Sec. 1355.45)
with conforming changes based on edits we made in Sec. 1355.44.
(b) Conforming Changes. We propose to make conforming changes to
Sec. Sec. 1355.41, 1355.43, and 1355.46 to update the citations or
dates as a result of our proposed amendments in other sections.
(3) Costs and Benefits. The benefits are that we will streamline
the AFCARS data elements which will reduce the title IV-E agency
reporting burden from the 2016 final rule, thus resulting in an
estimated $39.2 million in total annual savings. (Affected entities
will continue to incur $43.7 million in annual costs, net of federal
reimbursements, attributable to the 2016 final rule.) This NPRM, if
finalized as proposed, is expected to be an E.O. 13771 deregulatory
action.
II. Background on AFCARS and Regulation Development
AFCARS is authorized by section 479 of the Act, which mandates that
HHS regulate a data collection system for national adoption and foster
care data. Title IV-E agencies must submit data files on a semi-annual
basis to ACF. We use AFCARS data for a variety of requirements,
including but not limited to budgeting, providing national statistics
on the child welfare population, providing reports to Congress, and
monitoring compliance with title IV-B and IV-E requirements. AFCARS
regulations were first published in 1993 and states began submitting
data in fiscal year (FY) 1995. At that time, the requirements were set
forth in regulations at 45 CFR 1355.40 through 1355.47 and the
appendices to part 1355. Per the 2016 final rule, the requirements are
set forth in regulations at 45 CFR 1355.40 through 1355.47. The
regulations specify the reporting population, standards for compliance,
and all data elements.
We published the 2016 final rule revising the AFCARS regulations on
December 14, 2016 (81 FR 90524) and it
[[Page 16573]]
included child welfare legislative changes that occurred since 1993,
data elements related to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), and
implemented fiscal penalties for noncompliant AFCARS data. The 2016
final rule provided two fiscal years for title IV-E agencies to comply
with sections 1355.41 through 1355.47 and required title IV-E agencies
to continue to report AFCARS data in accordance with section 1355.40
and the appendices to part 1355 until September 30, 2019.
Executive Order 13777
On February 24, 2017, the President issued E.O. 13777 Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda to lower regulatory burdens on the American
people. It directed federal agencies to establish a Regulatory Reform
Task Force to review existing regulations and make recommendations
regarding their repeal, replacement, or modification. The HHS
Regulatory Reform Task Force identified the AFCARS regulation as one in
which the reporting burden may impose costs that exceed benefits.
In response to the E.O. 13777, ACF published two notices in the
Federal Register on March 15, 2018:
NPRM proposing to delay the implementation of the first
AFCARS report period under the December 2016 AFCARS final rule (45 CFR
1355.41-.47) by an additional two fiscal years, until October 1, 2021
(83 FR 11450).
ANPRM soliciting specific feedback on the AFCARS data
elements, costs to implement, and burden hours to complete the work
required to comply with the 2016 final rule and listed questions for
which we sought a response (83 FR 11449).
Implementation Delay of the 2016 Final Rule
The comment period ended on April 16, 2018. In response to the NPRM
on implementation delay, we received 43 comments and based on the
comments, we issued a final rule to delay the implementation of the
2016 final rule for one additional fiscal year, until October 1, 2020
(Published August 21, 2018, 83 FR 42225). However, since we are
proposing in this NPRM to revise the AFCARS data elements, we will
revisit this implementation date to provide a timeframe to allow title
IV-E agencies time to comply with the revised AFCARS data elements when
we finalize this proposal through a final rule.
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
The ANPRM's comment period was open for 90 days and ended on June
13, 2018. Through the ANPRM, ACF asked the public to give specific
feedback on the AFCARS data elements, costs to implement, and burden
hours to complete the work required to comply with the AFCARS
requirements in 2016 final rule. The ANPRM listed questions
specifically asking the public to comment on regarding the 2016 final
rule:
Identify the data elements that are overly burdensome for
title IV-E agencies,
Identify limitations title IV-E agencies will encounter in
data reporting, including an explanation with cost and burden estimates
for recordkeeping, reporting, and the number of children in foster care
who are Indian children as defined in ICWA, and
Recommendations on data elements to retain, simplify, and
remove with justifications, such as its use at the national level or
why the data would not be reliable in national statistics and would be
better asked through a qualitative case review.
In response to the ANPRM, we received 237 comments from 38 states,
38 Indian tribes or consortiums, 62 organizations representing state or
tribal interests, national public advocacy groups, professional
associations, universities, two members of Congress, and 97 private
citizens. The following is a summary and analysis of the public
comments relevant to the specific issues for which we sought input.
Summary of State Comments: Thirty-six of the 38 states supported
making revisions to streamline the AFCARS regulation. This was based on
each state's self-assessment of the cost and burden/work hours needed
at various levels of the agency and the number of hours it will take to
complete the work required to comply with the AFCARS 2016 final rule.
States shared similar concerns for implementing the requirements of the
2016 final rule such as: (1) Requiring the additional data elements
could adversely impact their ability to provide safety, permanency, and
well-being for youth in their care; (2) the additional work needed to
comply would pull valuable resources away from the field and decrease
the amount of time caseworkers have to work with families and children
toward reunification, safety and risk assessments and planning,
adoption, and other permanency activities; and (3) many new data
elements are qualitative and therefore more accurately evaluated by
quality assurance staff, through a case review or other monitoring
efforts. The comments from the two states that did not support revising
AFCARS focused on the value of the information that may be gleaned from
certain data elements related to sexual orientation and ICWA. Even
though the vast majority of states supported streamlining the AFCARS
data elements, they also expressed that the 2016 final rule was a
considerable improvement to the current AFCARS, will improve data
reporting, and provide national information on a number of new topics,
including ICWA, health needs, and permanency. States recognized that
more comprehensive data allows them to better understand the children
and families they serve. However, they felt that the 2016 final rule
was far-reaching and made suggestions for streamlining the data
elements, based on their cost and burden analysis.
State Comments regarding Burden Estimates: States ranged
considerably in estimating the work needed and length of time it would
take to comply with the 2016 final rule. The variability in state
estimates is expected and appropriate because there is considerable
variability across states in sophistication and capacity of information
systems, availability of both staff and financial resources, and
populations of children in care. It is expected for a state with a
large number of children in foster care to provide a much different
burden estimate than a state with fewer children in foster care. Each
state made a case about the increased and excessive burden as it
applied to that specific state. States estimated it would take between
200 to 25,000 hours to accomplish tasks related to the ICWA-related
data elements and 800 to 70,000 hours for completing work on all other
data elements. Some of the tasks associated with these wide-ranging
hours included:
Developing or modifying policies, procedures, rules, case
management systems, and electronic case records to comply with the
AFCARS requirements,
Searching for and gathering the information required to be
reported for the data elements,
Entering the information into the system, and
Training staff on the requirements and changes.
Hours related to developing and administering staff training ranged
from 20 to 102,000 hours depending on the number of staff that require
training and materials that must be developed.
State Comments regarding Cost Estimates: States' estimates varied
considerably, depending on the size of the state's out-of-home care
population, staffing needs, the length of time states have to implement
new AFCARS
[[Page 16574]]
requirements, and the level of current system functionality, including
modifications needed and data exchanges with other agency systems. As
mentioned previously, variability in state cost estimates is
appropriate because significant differences exist across state systems,
resources, and populations of children in care. States estimated that
total costs to comply with the 2016 final rule ranged from $1 million
for one year to $45 million over multiple years. They provided ranges
for specific costs, such as $41 million to hire and train new staff for
administrative support, $600,000 to $1 million for total initial costs,
and $741,000 to $11 million for ongoing costs. These costs included:
Analyzing policies, practice, and casework to determine
and implement modifications to capture and report data,
Systems changes (for example, contract and staff costs to
revise systems),
Developing and administering staff training, ongoing
monitoring, and quality assurance, and
Reporting the data to ACF.
State Comments regarding Data Elements: Based in large part on the
cost and hours required to complete the work to comply with the 2016
final rule, 36 states are in favor of streamlining the data elements in
the 2016 final rule, many of whom provided recommendations. States
recommended revisions to the data elements around education, health
assessments and conditions, youth pregnancy/fathering, siblings, prior
adoptions, caseworker visits, and sex trafficking. The reasons provided
for streamlining included that it would be costly to modify their
systems to report so many new data elements (compared to the AFCARS
prior to the 2016 final rule) and they did not see the benefit at the
national level for providing new information that was not explicitly
used for monitoring. A third of the states expressed concerns with the
data elements around sexual orientation and recommended they be removed
due to reasons such as it will not be reliable because youth would
self-report, which could result in an undercount, and due to the
sensitive and private nature of the information, they questioned the
implications of having this information in a government record.
Regarding the ICWA-related data elements, half of the states expressed
concern with the large number of and detailed questions asked related
to ICWA's requirements, with five states expressly asking for no ICWA-
related data elements in AFCARS. Many states felt that some of the
ICWA-related data elements in the 2016 final rule are redundant, overly
detailed, could be streamlined, or are too specific for a national data
set and are better suited for a qualitative review. Four states
reported that ICWA-applicable children in their out-of-home care
populations were well under one percent (1%). However, states with
higher numbers of tribal children in their care reported that they
supported including limited information related to ICWA in AFCARS
because they believe child welfare programs will be enhanced by having
this information to inform policy decisions and program management.
Summary of Comments from Indian Tribes and Organizations
Representing Tribal Interests: The 38 Indian tribes/consortiums and all
organizations representing tribal interests opposed streamlining the
AFCARS data elements and primarily focused their comments on ICWA's
requirements and the ICWA-related data elements. They did not provide
specific comments on or estimates for cost or burden related to the
2016 final rule. In general, they expressed that the state burden in
collecting the ICWA-related data elements is not significant enough to
warrant streamlining it because of their concerns regarding ICWA
compliance. Most of the commenters provided the following general
reasons for keeping all ICWA-related data elements in AFCARS:
ICWA has been law for 40 years but there has been little
in-depth data and limited federal oversight regarding this law.
Collecting ICWA-related data in AFCARS is a step in the
right direction to ensure that Indian families are kept together when
possible and provide insight into state compliance with ICWA's
requirements.
Without any uniform, national data regarding ICWA's
requirements, policymakers do not understand the scope of issues to
inform policy changes.
While some Indian tribes reported good working
relationships with some states, the commenters expressed concerns that
there are children in state custody who are not identified as Indian
children and thus are not protected under ICWA.
Largely, the commenters representing tribal interests expressed
support for retaining all of the data elements in the 2016 final rule
and specifically, all of the ICWA-related data elements for similar
reasons as noted above. They also expressed that:
States should currently be asking questions that ascertain
whether a child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA, including
inquiring about the family's tribal membership status,
Specific data elements on notification of proceedings and
transfers to tribal court are important because the timelines in ICWA
are rarely met, and
Information on termination of parental rights, removals
under ICWA, and placement preferences are important for determining
ICWA compliance.
Regarding the other data elements in the 2016 final rule, the
commenters largely supported those for reasons such as the information
will underscore the importance of certain casework activities (e.g.,
sibling placement whenever possible) and it will show trends in removal
circumstances, placements, and permanency outcomes that will inform
policymaking and provide a basis for education and training.
Summary of Comments from Organizations and Other Entities: The two
members of Congress and most other advocacy and trade organizations,
universities, private individuals, and other groups primarily focused
their comments on which data elements from the 2016 final rule to
remove or retain. They did not provide specific comments on or
estimates for cost or burden related to any aspect the 2016 final rule.
The majority of these commenters opposed streamlining the data for
reasons similar to the commenters representing tribal interests, such
as underscoring the importance of certain casework activities and
showing national trends. The commenters provided broad commentary on
the benefit of having new data outweighs the burden of having to report
it. A few commenters supported streamlining based on the cost and
system changes states will need to make to comply with AFCARS
requirements. We received numerous comments that were outside the scope
of the ANPRM, which did not address the questions for which we sought
public comment, such as there has been ample opportunities to comment
on AFCARS via prior rulemakings, repeated requests for feedback is an
undue burden, and ACF's authority to collect ICWA-related data elements
in AFCARS.
Commenters expressed support and some offered modifications for
particular data elements in the 2016 final rule such as health
assessments, educational status and special education, placement types,
caseworker visits, circumstances present at removal, prior adoptions,
title IV-E guardianships, youth who are pregnant or parenting, and
youth who may be victims of sex trafficking. They
[[Page 16575]]
suggested that updates to AFCARS were long overdue and that the data
elements related to ICWA and sexual orientation in particular will
yield important national information because current methods of
reporting, for example via the Child and Family Services Plans (CFSP)
and case file reviews, do not result in reliable or consistent data,
thus are ineffective at providing a national picture of children placed
in out-of-home care.
Comment Analysis: We reviewed and analyzed all of the ANPRM
comments, costs, and burden estimates and considered them as it related
to meeting the requirements of E.O. 13777. ACF heard the concerns and
interests of all stakeholders and after careful consideration, we
believe that proposing revisions to the AFCARS regulation through a
NPRM is warranted and within the spirit of E.O. 13777 to streamline and
reduce burden on title IV-E agencies.
Commenters sufficiently argued that many new data elements are
qualitative and therefore more accurately evaluated by quality
assurance staff, through a case review, or other monitoring efforts. We
must strongly weigh the desire for more information with the burden on
those who are required to report it. The need for streamlining was
convincingly argued through the states' detailed work and cost
estimates that the 2016 final rule has many data elements that can be
streamlined while still providing critical information on the out-of-
home care population from a national perspective.
More states submitted comments and more detailed comments and cost/
burden estimates in response to the ANPRM than in response to our
previous AFCARS proposals, thereby providing us with much more rich and
valuable information than we have had to date. Most of the state
comments to the ANPRM were detailed and contained comprehensive burden
and cost estimates illustrating the work they will have to undergo to
implement the 2016 final rule. While some states indicated that the
2016 final rule made improvements in the AFCARS requirements that will
enhance the knowledge about the children/youth in out-of-home care, the
vast majority agreed and convincingly articulated that some of the data
elements should be streamlined.
Regarding the ICWA-related data elements, section 479(c)(1) of the
Act requires that any data collection system developed and implemented
under this section must avoid unnecessary diversion of resources from
agencies. Requiring every state to modify its systems to be able to
report on a large number of data elements when the foster care
population does not reflect that the data elements will be applicable
to a majority of their children does not meet this mandate.
Additionally, according to AFCARS data on the race\ethnicity
distribution of children\youth in care as of September 30, 2016, in 33
states, children who have a reported race as American Indian/Alaskan
Native made up less than one percent of the children in foster care. We
believe AFCARS can be streamlined in a way that is responsive to all
concerned and in a way that can balance the need for updated data with
reducing the burden on title IV-E agencies.
In response to the commenters that supported the data elements as
promulgated in the 2016 final rule, we note that title IV-E agencies
are to develop case management/electronic case records that meet the
agency's business need. As such, title IV-E agencies may collect all of
the data elements contained in the 2016 final rule regardless of what
is ultimately required to be reported to ACF by title IV-E agencies in
a rule that finalizes this NPRM. The AFCARS data elements are
information that we require be reported to ACF, but we understand that
title IV-E agencies collect more information in their own case records
to support case practice that meets the needs of the children and
families they serve. We commend the willingness to collect a more
comprehensive array of information. However, the information we require
title IV-E agencies to report to ACF via AFCARS must take into
consideration and reflect the circumstances and capacity of all title
IV-E agencies in setting the AFCARS requirements.
ACF understands and appreciates that Congress and stakeholders are
interested in the well-being of children in foster care and we
understand that national data about these children is useful for many
reasons. However, the vast majority of commenters that opposed
streamlining are not required to report AFCARS data and did not offer
any specific estimates regarding the burden or cost placed on reporting
title IV-E agencies. These commenters believed it was necessary for
agencies to report qualitative data on particular topics through AFCARS
for policy making purposes and justified it with general statements
that the benefits of more data outweigh the burden to report it.
However, it was not well illustrated why AFCARS is the best vehicle for
collecting this data when there are other effective options for
gathering qualitative information at the national level, such as via
surveys, research, or the Child and Family Services Review.
The suggestion that more data elements in AFCARS is essential for
policy making was not sufficiently validated in the ANPRM comments. It
would have been useful if the commenters identified the specific
policies that they felt needed the detailed level of AFCARS data so
urgently and why AFCARS specifically is the best means for collection
of this data. Congress has passed approximately 24 laws that
significantly amended federal child welfare programs since 1995, when
AFCARS became effective. These policy changes were made despite not
having the additional data from the 2016 final rule. Congress recently
amended the statute at section 479 of the Act to require data elements
it deems relevant for national public interest. For example, Congress
required collection of information on sex trafficking victims (section
479(c)(3)(E) of the Act) and prior adoptions/guardianships (section
479(d) of the Act).
Based on state cost estimates, ACF is also concerned that a
significant expansion of AFCARS at this time would negatively impact
states' ability to take advantage of the new title IV-E prevention
services program (see section 471(e) of the Act). Title IV-E is a cost
reimbursement program, therefore, states must secure funding for the
services, interventions, evaluation, data collection, and reporting out
of their own resources before being reimbursed by the federal
government for a portion of those costs. State cost estimates of the
2016 final rule are significant. Imposing additional reporting costs at
this time, coupled with the new limits on federal funding for foster
care maintenance payments for children in certain congregate care
facilities and the reinstatement of eligibility criteria for infants
and children up to age two in the title IV-E adoption assistance
program included in the Family First Prevention Services Act (Public
Law (Pub. L.) 115-123) may severely impede states' ability to opt into
the title IV-E prevention services program.
Input From Federal Agency Experts
As part of the process to meet the requirements of E.O. 13777 and
on-going intra-agency collaboration related to data collection and
analysis at ACF, the Children's Bureau consulted with the Department's
subject matter experts with an interest in AFCARS data. We reviewed
each data element in the 2016 final rule and evaluated whether it is
needed for a specific purpose, such as a title IV-B/IV-E statutory
requirement
[[Page 16576]]
and program monitoring, Congressional reporting, or budgeting, and to
specifically identify whether including the data in AFCARS would
improve the accuracy and reliability of the data. Given current
budgetary constraints on title IV-E and federal agencies, the objective
was to be clear on how each data element meets a mandate and how ACF
will use the data, thus justifying it being a requirement for
reporting. The subject matter experts identified a number of data
elements that do not have a specific purpose for title IV-B/IV-E
statute or program monitoring, Congressional reporting, or budgeting.
Additionally, the Children's Bureau consulted with representatives of
the Department of Interior (DOI) regarding the ICWA-related data
elements to retain in AFCARS.
After considering all input from ANPRM commenters and the
Department's subject matter experts with an interest in AFCARS, ACF
proposes to streamline the AFCARS data elements to what ACF believes is
a reasonable amount. We believe that this proposal meets the requests
from states to streamline and reduce redundancies in the regulation;
from Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and other stakeholders for
keeping data elements related to specific areas; and to meet the
requirements of E.O. 13777.
III. Overview of Major Proposed Revisions to Data Elements
The revisions proposed in this NPRM reflect ACF's review and
analysis of the ANPRM comments and input from the Department's subject
matter experts with an interest in AFCARS data, and consideration
related to meeting the requirements of the E.O. 13777. The proposed
revisions streamline the data elements to ones with a specific purpose
for title IV-B/IV-E statute and program monitoring, Congressional
reporting, budgeting, and areas where reporting of required information
to AFCARS would improve the accuracy and reliability of the data in
AFCARS. An overview of the major proposed revisions to the AFCARS data
elements follows.
For the out-of-home care data file, the 2016 final rule required
approximately 272 items where we require title IV-E agencies to report
information. In this NPRM, we propose to reduce these points to
approximately 183, representing 170 that we propose to keep from the
2016 final rule and 13 we propose to modify.
We propose a simplification of data elements related to health
assessments, child financial and medical assistance, child's
relationship to foster/adoptive parents and legal guardians, and inter-
jurisdictional adoptive/guardianship placements to keep only essential
information as identified by ANPRM commenters on children in out-of-
home care and who exit to adoption or legal guardianship. We propose to
remove the following data elements because the information is too
detailed or qualitative for a national data set, it may be inaccurately
reported and therefore would be difficult to portray in a meaningful
way and it does not have a specific purpose for title IV-B/IV-E statute
and program monitoring, Congressional reporting, or budgeting:
Educational stability,
authority for placement and care responsibility,
private agency living arrangement,
juvenile justice involvement,
transition plan and date, and
interjurisdictional adoption or guardianship jurisdiction
(name).
As stated in section II, a third of the states expressed concerns
with the data elements around sexual orientation and recommended they
be removed. States commented that if this information is important to
decisions affecting the child, the information will be in the case
file; however, when it is not pertinent, states said that asking for
sexual orientation may be perceived as intrusive and worrisome to those
who have experienced trauma and discrimination as a result of gender
identity or sexual orientation. This would be a mandatory conversation
a worker must have in order to complete the data elements. Mandating
such a conversation may be contraindicated based on a child's history
of abuse or neglect.
In addition to the ANPRM comments, we reviewed the 2014 document
entitled ``Current Measures of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
in Federal Surveys'' prepared by the OMB Federal Interagency Working
Group on Improving Measurement of Sexual Orientation and Gender
Identity in Federal Surveys. Most concerning to our AFCARS work is the
section of the document that ``reviews and identifies issues for
Federal agencies to consider when choosing sexual orientation and
gender identity (SOGI) questions for inclusion in Federal surveys and
administrative databases.'' Overall, regardless of whether questions on
sexual orientation are asked in a survey, interview, or otherwise, they
may be considered sensitive and/or personal which means that certain
issues must be considered. The paper specifically indicates that
``before incorporating SOGI questions in surveys or administrative
databases, Federal agencies need to consider the purpose and objectives
of the survey or database and the reason to add SOGI questions.''
Further, the paper advises that new questions added to a survey or data
base should be validated with qualitative techniques and question
validation efforts should include both the SOGI and non-SOGI groups. In
addition, the paper identifies other considerations when developing
questions in this area. This includes a person's age, and the paper
specifically notes that'' teenagers may be in the midst of developing
their sexual orientation . . . and therefore they may be unsure of how
to respond to SOGI questions.'' Adolescents may use different terms to
describe their sexual orientation than terms used by adults. Bullying
related to one's sexual orientation may cause some adolescents to be
reluctant to identify themselves with terms that must be regulated in
AFCARS. This emphasizes the importance that respondents are confident
that their responses are private, anonymous, and confidential. Other
factors that are relevant to asking questions related to sexual
orientation are cultural or racial/ethnic considerations and geography.
For example, there may also be regional differences in interviewers'
and respondents' comfort with questions about their sexual orientation.
As a result of our review of the OMB document, in particular,
taking into consideration the need to validate questions related to
sexual orientation and ensure responses about sexual orientation,
especially with adolescents, are private, anonymous, and confidential,
it is clear that AFCARS is not the appropriate vehicle to collect this
information. It is not feasible for us to test the validity or accuracy
of adding questions related to sexual orientation across all title IV-E
agencies. Additionally, it is impossible to ensure that a child's
response to a question on sexual orientation would be kept private,
anonymous, or confidential considering a caseworker would be gathering
this information to enter into a child's case electronic record.
Information in case records are kept confidential, but because the
child is in the placement and care of the title IV-E agency,
information on the child's case must be disclosed to courts and
providers under specific circumstances, to assist the child and family.
Information on sexual orientation, if it is not relevant to the child's
needs, is not appropriate to be included. Information on sexual
orientation is more appropriately collected through a survey because
that would allow for testing of the questions, training by staff
[[Page 16577]]
administering the survey, and addressing the issues raised by the OMB
paper to provide more controls for allowing anonymity, privacy, and
confidentiality.
We acknowledge that other personal information is reported to
AFCARS, such as medical or mental health information. This data,
however, is documented in official documents, such as medical reports
and records, and is in the child's case record because section
475(1)(C) of the Act requires health and education records be in the
case plan. Information on sexual orientation is not required by the Act
to be in the child's case plan, and while states agreed that the
individual workers knowing this information about children and families
they work with may help them in assisting families, there is no
statutory requirement that it be reported to a national administrative
data set.
However, there was support from commenters for keeping the
circumstance at removal on whether there was family conflict related to
the child's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
This means that agencies will report whether this was a circumstance
surrounding the child at removal. This is different than asking for
someone's sexual orientation because the information would be gathered
during the course of the investigation that resulted in the child's
removal from the home and documented in the case record. The data
element Child and family circumstances at removal, has many
circumstances to which the agency will report whether each ``applies''
or ``does not apply.'' If family conflict related to the child's sexual
orientation, gender identity, or gender expression (Sec.
1355.44(d)(4)(xxx)) was not known as a circumstance surrounding the
child at removal, or was not documented in the electronic case record,
the information will be reported to AFCARS as ``does not apply.'' This
does not require the worker to have a conversation in instances where
it is not appropriate or not applicable to the child's wellbeing. We
believe that this circumstance at removal captures information
appropriate for a national data set that will provide insight into
issues of potential discrimination, safety concerns, and homelessness
experienced by youth because it is inherent in what the circumstance is
asking. Additionally, there will be an opportunity for analysis via a
combination of information gleaned from other data elements, for
example, the sex and marital status of foster parents, adoptive
parents, and legal guardians. The information from these data elements
will provide an overview of the number of foster, adoptive, and legal
guardian couples who identify as non-heterosexual. While we understand
the importance of collecting sexual orientation data and appreciate the
comments that supported keeping the data elements, we must balance this
with the need to collect accurate data per the statue and in a manner
that is consistent with children's treatment needs.
We propose a simplification of the ICWA-related data elements to
the information that commenters to the ANPRM and others during
consultation indicated were essential for identifying the number of
children in out-of-home care nationally, who should be afforded the
protections of ICWA. The ICWA-related data elements from the 2016 final
rule that we kept and revised are:
Whether the state title IV-E agency made inquiries of
whether the child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA,
child's tribal membership and all federally recognized
tribes that may potentially be the Indian child's tribe,
whether ICWA applies for the child and the date that the
state title IV-E agency was notified by the Indian tribe or state or
tribal court that ICWA applies,
whether the Indian child's tribe(s) was sent legal notice
in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a), and
tribal membership of mother, father, foster parents,
adoptive parents, and legal guardians.
During consultation, tribal representatives expressed a need for
information on the tribal membership of children in foster care and
their foster care/adoptive placements, whether ICWA applies to the
child, and notification of proceedings per ICWA requirements. These
data elements were identified as the most important pieces of
information to be able to know the number of children nationally where
ICWA applies and provide some national information on whether the state
made inquiries and whether notification to the Indian child's tribe
occurred.
The ICWA-related data elements from the 2016 final rule that we are
removing are request to transfer to tribal court, denial of transfer,
court findings related to involuntary and voluntary termination of
parental rights, including good cause findings, qualified expert
witness testimony, whether active efforts were made prior to the
termination/modification, removals under ICWA, available ICWA foster
care/pre-adoptive placement preferences, adoption/guardianship
placement preferences under ICWA, good cause and basis for good cause
under ICWA, and information on active efforts. These data elements
asked for detailed information on ICWA's requirements, tied to DOI
regulations and the ICWA statute, and court actions.
We also understand that it is important to states, Indian tribes,
and stakeholders to know the information behind the data elements we
are removing. While we have demonstrated that the detailed ICWA-related
information from the 2016 final rule is not appropriate for AFCARS, we
are also demonstrating a commitment to obtain alternative methods that
will inform aspects of ICWA. First, using the information that will be
reported for other data elements proposed in the NPRM, ACF,
researchers, and others will be able to analyze aspects of ICWA to
inform an assessment of ICWA that occurs outside of AFCARS reporting.
Below are areas where commenters identified they wanted to keep some of
the ICWA-related data elements and we explain what we propose to
collect in other data elements that will inform aspects of ICWA:
Transfers: We propose to collect whether any child in the
out-of-home care reporting population exits out-of-home care to a
transfer to an Indian tribe (that operates a title IV-E program or that
does not operate a title IV-E program) in Sec. 1355.44(g)(4). We do
not require reporting on the specifics of ICWA requirements as to
whether there was a request orally on the record or in writing, whether
the state court denied the request, and good cause because this
information is better for a qualitative assessment that can provide
context. The information proposed in this NPRM on transfers can be used
to inform a qualitative assessment.
Placement preferences for foster care, adoption and
guardianship: We proposed to collect tribal membership of foster/
adoptive parents and guardians, whether placement is relative or kin,
and the name of the jurisdiction where the child is living for foster
care (see section 1355.44(e)). We do not require reporting on what
placements were available, whether the placement meets the requirements
of the Indian child's tribe or ICWA, or whether the there was good
cause to deviate from the Indian child's tribe's or ICWA's placement
preferences. The information we propose in this NPRM on placements and
tribal membership can be used to inform a qualitative assessment that
will allow context, because placement decisions are specific to the
child's needs.
[[Page 16578]]
Voluntary or involuntary termination/modifications of
parental rights: We propose to collect whether a termination/
modification of parental rights is voluntary or involuntary and will
require it be reported for all children (Sec. 1355.44(c)(5)). We do
not require reporting of the ICWA-specific requirements on court
findings regarding reasonable doubt on continued custody, qualified
expert witness testimony, and whether efforts to prevent the breakup of
the Indian family were unsuccessful. However, knowing whether the
termination/modification was involuntary or voluntary can be used to
inform a qualitative assessment on these proceedings because these
decisions are specific to each case and court action and thus need
context to fully understand them.
Additionally, the Court Improvement Program (CIP) requires grantees
to engage in meaningful and ongoing collaboration with the state child
welfare agency and tribes (section 438(b)(1)(C) of the Act). In
furtherance of this statutory mandate, the next program instruction for
the CIP will encourage grantees to work with the dependency courts
across their jurisdictions to enhance efforts to collect and track key
ICWA data indicators. This is logical because the requirements of ICWA
and accompanying regulations are upon state courts. The capacity of
state and county courts to collect and track data varies widely across
the country. Many courts either do not track ICWA-related data
currently or do so inconsistently. The forthcoming program
instruction's emphasis on collecting and tracking ICWA-related data
will be coupled with technical assistance through the CB's technical
assistance provider for CIP grantees and the courts to help address
this historic and ongoing information gap. CIP grantees will be
encouraged to use CIP grant funds to assess the court's ICWA practice,
support the court's data infrastructure, and train key court personnel
on the importance of monitoring ICWA. Specifically, CIP grantees will
be encouraged and supported to collect and monitor data on court
inquiries, orders and findings related to:
Identification of Indian children as defined in ICWA,
notice to Indian tribes,
tribal participation as parties in hearings involving
Indian children,
tribal intervention in dependency cases,
transfer of ICWA cases to tribal courts, and
placement of Indian children according to tribal
preferences.
These are two examples of how we are committed obtaining more
information on ICWA through appropriate and alternative methods that
allow for a fuller understanding of ICWA's role in child welfare cases
that AFCARS cannot provide. Thus, based on the ANPRM comments and
consultation, we believe that this proposal represents a balance for
the need for data on the population of children to whom ICWA applies
and state concerns for the burden and costs for collecting and
reporting the large number of ICWA-related data elements in the 2016
final rule.
We note that due to the low numbers of children in the out-of-home
care reporting population where ICWA applies, we will not be able to
release specific information regarding the child's tribal membership or
ICWA applicability to requestors, except for the Indian tribe of which
the child is or may be a member. When AFCARS data is released to the
public by the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect
(NDACAN), the data is de-identified, meaning that it does not include
names, numbers, or other information that would make directly
identifying the children possible. However, when the NDACAN provides
data on populations where the number of children in the out-of-home
care reporting population is low (for example, a county), there is a
risk of possibly identifying a child using a unique combination of
indirect identifiers in the AFCARS data, such as tribal membership and
dates of removals, placements, and exits. To mitigate these risks, the
NDACAN takes specific measures in releasing the data to protect
confidentiality. Thus, to protect the confidentiality of these
children, we will be unable to release certain information related to
tribal membership or ICWA applicability, except to the Indian tribe of
which the child is or may be a member.
IV. Implementation Timeframe
Implementation of changes to the AFCARS data elements as described
in this NPRM will be dependent on the issuance of a final rule. We
expect provisions in an eventual final rule to be effective no sooner
than the start of the second federal fiscal year following the
publication of the final rule. A precise effective date will be
dependent on the publication date of the final rule, but this construct
provides title IV-E agencies with at least one full year before we will
require them to begin collecting and reporting new AFCARS data
elements. We welcome public comments on specific provisions included in
this proposed rule that may warrant a longer phase-in period.
V. Public Participation
We understand that there have been several opportunities to
comment, in general, on AFCARS. However, each comment solicitation has
been on a different iteration of AFCARS. In this NPRM, AFCARS is
streamlined from the 2016 final rule, thus commenters must focus their
comments on the data elements proposed in this specific rulemaking.
Commenters should consider how this proposed iteration of AFCARS will
impact their work and budgets and be specific when commenting on this
NPRM. Commenters should identify the specific data elements to which
their comments apply and provide specific supporting information for
the comment. We welcome public comments on the data elements that we
are proposing to remove or revise from the 2016 final rule.
We encourage commenters to speak to the following:
Whether the information is readily available or collected
as part of the title IV-E agency's casework.
Recordkeeping hours spent annually to adjust existing ways
to comply with AFCARS requirements, gather and enter information into
the electronic case management system, and training and administrative
tasks associated with training personnel on the AFCARS requirements
(e.g., reviewing instructions, developing training and manuals).
Reporting hours spent annually extracting the information
for AFCARS reporting and transmitting the information proposed in this
NPRM to ACF.
Timeframes required to complete the work.
Specifically how reporting the data elements in this NPRM
will enhance their work with children and families.
We understand that stakeholders who are not title IV-E agencies
will not be able to offer specific estimates regarding the burden or
cost placed on title IV-E agencies for reporting AFCARS because they
are not required to report AFCARS data. However, we believe that it
would be appropriate and helpful for commenters to provide specific
reasons as to why they think AFCARS is the most effective vehicle for
collection of the data proposed in this NPRM and why no other current
method is feasible to collect the information. Additional comments that
would be helpful would describe any work done to coordinate
[[Page 16579]]
with title IV-E agencies in collecting and reporting data for AFCARS
and how AFCARS data, which is aggregated at the national level, would
help their specific work with title IV-E agencies, children, and
families.
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of Regulatory Provisions
Section 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System
This section states the scope of AFCARS. Paragraph (c) of this
section prescribes the definitions of terms used in the AFCARS data
elements and these terms as defined in the 2016 final rule are
unchanged. We propose to make minor conforming amendments to paragraphs
(c)(1) and (2) to update the citations to the ICWA-related data
elements as a result of our proposed amendments to Sec. 1355.44.
Section 1355.43 Data Reporting Requirements
This section states the AFCARS data reporting requirements and
these requirements are unchanged from the 2016 final rule. In paragraph
(b)(3), we propose that the title IV-E agency report the date of
removal, exit date, and exit reason for each child who had an out-of-
home care episode prior to October 1, 2020. As stated in the 2016 final
rule, this means that title IV-E agencies do not need to report
complete historical and current information for these children. We are
proposing this change of the new date to October 1, 2020 to conform to
the date in the final rule we published in the Federal Register on
August 21, 2018 (83 FR 42225).
Section 1355.44 Out-of-Home Care Data File Elements
This section states the data element descriptions for the out-of-
home care data file.
Section 1355.44(a) General Information
In paragraph (a), we propose that title IV-E agencies collect and
report general information that identifies the reporting title IV-E
agency as well as the child in out-of-home care. We propose the data
elements below and they are unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
Title IV-E agency. In paragraph (a)(1), we propose that the title
IV-E agency indicate the name of the title IV-E agency responsible for
submitting AFCARS data to ACF. A state title IV-E agency must indicate
its state name. ACF will work with tribal title IV-E agencies to
provide guidance during implementation.
Report date. In paragraph (a)(2), we propose that the title IV-E
agency indicate the report period date, which is the last month and
year that corresponds with the end of the report period.
Local agency. In paragraph (a)(3), we propose that the title IV-E
agency report the name of the local county, jurisdiction, or equivalent
unit that has responsibility for the child. ACF will work with tribal
title IV-E agencies to provide guidance during implementation.
Child record number. In paragraph (a)(4), we propose that the title
IV-E agency report the child's record number, which is a unique person
identification number, as an encrypted number. The child record number
must remain the same for the child no matter where the child lives
while in the placement and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency
and across all report periods and out-of-home care episodes. This
number remains the same if the child exits the out-of-home care data
file and enters the reporting population for the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file. The title IV-E agency must apply and
retain the same encryption routine or method for the child record
number across all report periods. The title IV-E agency's encryption
methodology must meet all ACF standards prescribed through technical
bulletins or policy.
Section 1355.44(b) Child Information
In paragraph (b), we propose that the title IV-E agency collect and
report child specific information for the identified child in out-of-
home care.
Child's date of birth. In paragraph (b)(1), we propose that the
title IV-E agency report the child's date of birth including the month,
day and year. If the child was abandoned and the actual date of birth
is not known, an estimated date of birth is to be provided. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the collection
of comprehensive national information with respect to the demographic
characteristics of foster children.
Child's sex. In paragraph (b)(2), we propose to require the title
IV-E agency to report only the child's sex. The proposed response
options are ``male'' and ``female''. The response options are unchanged
from the 2016 final rule; the only change is to the name of the data
element, from ``gender'' to ``sex''. Commenters to the ANPRM suggested
that the data element ``gender'' in the 2016 final rule be revised to
reflect a gender other than male or female but HHS did not identify a
compelling reason to increase the reporting burden by requesting the
provision of this information, which might not be collected
consistently.
Reason to know a child is an ``Indian Child'' as defined in the
Indian Child Welfare Act. In paragraph (b)(3), we propose to require
the state title IV-E agency to report whether it made inquiries to
determine if the child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA. The 2016
final rule requires state title IV-E agencies to report whether it
specifically inquired with seven different people/entities. We propose
to modify this data element from the 2016 final rule to require the
state title IV-E agency to report generally whether inquiries were made
as to whether the child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA and
remove the list of specific people/entities. As we explained in section
II, the specifics of the individual people/entities inquired with are
better suited for a qualitative review because this information is too
detailed for national statistics and therefore would be difficult to
portray in a meaningful way. However, during consultation, it was noted
that knowing whether the title IV-E agency inquired about the child's
status as an Indian child as defined in ICWA is essential in
determining whether ICWA applies for a child. Commenters to the ANPRM
also noted that this information is useful demographic information on
the children in the out-of-home care reporting population.
Child's tribal membership. In paragraph (b)(4), we propose to
require the state title IV-E agency to report whether the child is a
member of or eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and if so,
indicate all of the federally recognized tribes with which the child
may potentially be associated. This information must be submitted in a
format specified by ACF. In the 2016 final rule, this is part of the
data elements on Reason to know a child is an ``Indian Child'' as
defined in the Indian Child Welfare Act. We propose to modify this data
element from the 2016 final rule to make it a separate data element
asking about the child's tribal membership status and report all
federally recognized tribes that may potentially be the Indian child's
tribe(s), if applicable. During consultation, it was noted that knowing
whether the child is a member of or eligible for membership in an
Indian tribe is essential in determining whether ICWA applies for a
child. Commenters to the ANPRM also noted that this information is
useful demographic information on the children in the out-of-home care
reporting population.
Application of ICWA. In paragraph (b)(5), we propose to require the
state
[[Page 16580]]
title IV-E agency to report whether ICWA applies for the child and if
yes, the date the Indian tribe or state or tribal court notified the
state title IV-E agency that ICWA applies. In the 2016 final rule, this
information is split among multiple data elements that ask whether the
state title IV-E agency knows or has reason to know that the child is
an Indian child as defined in ICWA, whether a court determined that
ICWA applies, and if so, the date of the court determination. We
propose to revise this data element from the 2016 final rule to only
ask whether ICWA applies for the child, with a response of ``yes'',
``no'', or ``unknown,'' and if yes, the date the state title IV-E
agency was notified of this determination. As we explained in section
II, commenters to the ANPRM felt that some of the ICWA-related data
elements were redundant because they asked for similar information in
multiple data elements. This is one area that the commenters noted
should be combined. The data we propose to collect in paragraph (b)(5)
will identify the child records in the out-of-home care reporting
population where ICWA applies and will provide a national number of the
children in the out-of-home care reporting population to whom ICWA
applies.
Notification. In paragraph (b)(6), we propose to require the state
title IV-E agency to report whether the child's Indian tribe was sent
legal notice, in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a), if the state title
IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph (b)(5)(i). The data element
in the 2016 final rule requires state title IV-E agencies to report
also whether notice was sent to the Indian child's parent or Indian
custodian. We propose to modify this data element from the 2016 final
rule to only require the state title IV-E agency to respond with
``yes'' or ``no'' that it sent notification to the Indian tribe.
Notification was identified during consultation as a key aspect of
ICWA's requirements that should remain in AFCARS because notification
is critical to meaningful access to and participation in adjudications.
The data will help identify to what extent notification is being done
by the state title IV-E agency on a national level for children in the
out-of-home care reporting population.
Child's race. In paragraph (b)(7), we propose to require the title
IV-E agency to report the race of the child. We continue to propose
this data element because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the
collection of comprehensive national information with respect to the
demographic characteristics of foster children. In paragraph (b)(7)(vi)
for Race-unknown, we added instructions to clarify that this category
does not apply when the child has been abandoned or the parents failed
to return and the identity of the child, parent(s), or legal
guardian(s) is known. If a child is abandoned, the title IV-E agency
must report per paragraph (b)(7)(vii). We made this clarifying edit to
address some confusion expressed by commenters to the ANPRM. All other
data elements are unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
Child's Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. In paragraph (b)(8), we
propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the Hispanic or
Latino ethnicity of the child. This is unchanged from the 2016 final
rule. We continue to propose this data element because section
479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the collection of comprehensive
national information with respect to the demographic characteristics of
foster children.
Health assessment. In paragraph (b)(9), we propose to require the
title IV-E agency to report whether the child had a health assessment
during the current out-of-home care episode. We propose to simplify
this data element from the 2016 final rule to require the title IV-E
agency to respond ``yes'' or ``no'' and to remove the additional data
elements for reporting the date of the child's most recent health
assessment and if it was within the timeframes established by the
agency. Commenters suggested removing these data elements because the
specific information around the dates of health assessments and whether
they are timely is too detailed for national statistics and therefore
would be difficult to portray in a meaningful way. However, commenters
noted that knowing whether a child had a health assessment will support
ACF in assessing the current state of the well-being of children placed
in out-of-home care and implementation of title IV-B requirement around
health assessment and planning per section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act.
Health, behavioral or mental health conditions. In paragraph
(b)(10), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether
the child was diagnosed by a qualified professional as having one or
more health, behavioral or mental health conditions from a list of
eleven conditions prior to or during the child's current out-of-home
care episode. If so, the agency must report whether it is an existing
condition or a previous condition (a previous diagnoses that no longer
exists as a current condition). The title IV-E agency must also report
if the child had an exam or assessment, but none of the conditions
apply, or if the agency has not received the results of the exam or
assessment. When the child has not had an exam or assessment, the
agency must indicate so. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element because the annual outcomes
report to Congress includes statistics on children with a diagnosed
disability and also must contain information on children placed in a
child care institution with a special needs or another diagnosed mental
or physical illness or condition, per section 479A(a)(7)(A)(i)(III) of
the Act. The information needed for the annual outcomes report to
Congress comes from AFCARS data.
School enrollment. In paragraph (b)(11), we propose to require the
title IV-E agency to report whether the child is a full-time student at
and enrolled in (or in the process of enrolling in) elementary or
secondary education, or is a full or part-time student at and enrolled
in post-secondary education or training, or college, or whether the
child is not enrolled in any school setting. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data element because we
will use this information, combined with other AFCARS data elements, to
assess nationally the well-being of children placed in out-of-home care
as part of monitoring the title IV-B and IV-E programs through reviews.
Educational level. In paragraph (b)(12), we propose to require the
title IV-E agency to report the highest educational level from
kindergarten to college or post-secondary education/training, as well
as a general equivalency diploma (GED), completed by the child as of
the last day of the report period. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this data element because we will
use this information, combined with other AFCARS data elements to
assess nationally the well-being of children placed in out-of-home care
as part of monitoring the title IV-B and IV-E programs through reviews.
Pregnant or parenting. In paragraph (b)(13), we propose to require
the title IV-E agency to report whether the child has ever fathered or
bore a child, as well as whether the child and child(ren) are placed
together in foster care. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
This data element is used in the annual report to Congress consistent
with section 479A(a)(7)(B) of the Act and budget formulation for the
title IV-E program.
Special education. In paragraph (b)(14), we propose to require the
title IV-E agency to report on the child's
[[Page 16581]]
special education status by indicating if the child has an
Individualized Education Program (IEP) or an Individualized Family
Service Program (IFSP). This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element because the annual report to
Congress must contain information on children placed in a child care
institution receiving specialized education, per section
479A(a)(7)(A)(i)(IV) of the Act.
Prior adoption. In paragraph (b)(15), we propose to require the
title IV-E agency to report whether the child experienced a prior legal
adoption, including any public, private, or independent adoption in the
United States or adoption in another country, and a tribal customary
adoption, prior to the current out-of-home care episode. If so, the
title IV-E agency must report the date it was finalized and whether the
child's prior adoption was an intercountry adoption. This is unchanged
from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data element to
fulfill the statutory mandate in section 479(c)(3)(C)(ii) and 479(d) of
the Act which requires information regarding children who enter into
foster care after prior finalization of an adoption. This information
will also be used to improve consistency with the data we provide to
the State Department for their reports regarding international
adoptions. Currently, the information is reported via a narrative in
the CFSP and annual updates. This proposed method is preferred because
currently the information must be compiled from the narratives and the
reporting is not consistent across title IV-E agencies. Having this
information in AFCARS will improve the accuracy, reliability, and
consistency of the data because it will become an automated reporting
through AFCARS.
Prior guardianship. In paragraph (b)(16), we propose to require the
title IV-E agency to report whether the child experienced a prior legal
guardianship and if so, to report the date that the prior legal
guardianship became legalized. This is unchanged from the 2016 final
rule. We continue to propose this data element to fulfill the statutory
mandate in section 479(d) of the Act which requires information
regarding children who enter into foster care after prior finalization
of a legal guardianship.
Child financial and medical assistance. In paragraph (b)(17), we
propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether the child
received financial and medical assistance, other than title IV-E foster
care maintenance payments. We propose to revise this data element from
the 2016 final rule to simplify the types of assistance to be reported
to only include: ``state/tribal adoption assistance''; ``state/tribal
foster care''; ``Title IV-E adoption subsidy''; ``Title IV-E
guardianship assistance''; ``Title IV-A TANF''; ``Title IV-B'';
``Chafee Foster Care Independence Program''; or ``Other''. The data
element in the 2016 final rule required state title IV-E agencies to
report also whether the child received SSI or Social Security Benefits,
title XIX, title XXI, title XX, or child support. We propose to remove
those five data elements due to ANPRM comments that cited reporting on
the multiple financial options as burdensome and suggested these data
elements be streamlined. The financial categories that remain are the
essentials for children in out-of-home care to meet the requirement in
section 479(c)(3)(D) of the Act related to the nature of assistance
supporting the child. The other categories were determined to be
extraneous information and delineating these categories in AFCARS does
not enhance information about the child when other reporting methods,
such as the CB-496 financial reporting form, exist to address this
information.
Title IV-E foster care during report period. In paragraph (b)(18),
we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether a title
IV-E foster care maintenance payment was paid on behalf of the child at
any point during the report period. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We propose to continue this data element because section
479(c)(3)(D) of the Act requires the collection of the extent and
nature of assistance provided by federal, state, and local adoption and
foster care programs and it is used for the federal title IV-E reviews
per 45 CFR 1356.71.
Siblings. In paragraphs (b)(19) through (21), we propose to require
title IV-E agency to report the total number of siblings that the child
has, if applicable, the number of siblings who are in foster care as
defined in Sec. 1355.20, and the number of siblings who are in the
same living arrangement as the child, on the last day of the report
period. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose these data elements on siblings because we will use this
information, combined with other AFCARS data elements to assess
nationally the well-being of children placed in out-of-home care as
part of monitoring the title IV-B and IV-E programs through the Child
and Family Services Reviews (CFSR).
Section 1355.44(c) Parent or Legal Guardian Information
In paragraph (c), we propose that the title IV-E agency collect and
report information on the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Year of birth parent(s) or legal guardian(s). In paragraphs (c)(1)
and (2), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the
birth year of the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s). If the child
has both a parent and a legal guardian, or two different sets of legal
parents, the title IV-E agency must report on those who had legal
responsibility for the child. If the child was abandoned and the
identity of the parent or legal guardian is unknown and cannot be
ascertained, the title IV-E agency would indicate ``abandoned.'' If
there is not another parent or legal guardian, the title IV-E agency
would indicate ``not applicable.'' This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. We continue to propose this data element because section
479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the collection of comprehensive
national information with respect to the demographic characteristics of
biological parents.
Tribal membership mother and father. In paragraphs (c)(3) and (4),
we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether the
biological or adoptive mother and father are members of an Indian
tribe. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. During consultation,
it was noted that knowing whether the mother and father are members of
an Indian tribe is necessary in determining whether ICWA applies for a
child.
Termination/modification of parental rights. In paragraph (c)(5),
we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether the
rights for each parent were terminated or modified on a voluntary or
involuntary basis. A voluntary termination means the parent(s)
voluntarily relinquished parental rights to the title IV-E agency, with
or without court involvement. In paragraph (c)(5)(i), we propose that
the title IV-E agency report each date the petition to terminate/modify
parental rights was filed, if applicable. In paragraph (c)(5)(ii), we
propose that the title IV-E agency report the date parental rights were
terminated/modified, if applicable. This is unchanged from the 2016
final rule. Section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act requires title IV-E
agencies to report on the status of the foster care population,
including children available for adoption. The termination/modification
dates, petition dates, and whether it is voluntary or involuntary is
used for title IV-E program monitoring via the CFSR to monitor
compliance with the
[[Page 16582]]
requirement in section 475(5)(E) of the Act. In the case of a child who
has been in foster care under the responsibility of the title IV-E
agency for 15 of the most recent 22 months, section 475(5)(E) of the
Act requires the title IV-E agency to file a petition to terminate the
parental rights unless an exception exists, as defined in statute.
Having this information in AFCARS will improve the accuracy and
reliability of the dates to use for the CFSR.
Section 1355.44(d) Removal Information
In paragraph (d), we propose that the title IV-E agency collect and
report information on each of the child's removal(s).
Date of child's removal. In paragraph (d)(1), we propose to require
the title IV-E agency to collect and report the date(s), on which the
child was removed for each removal of a child who enters the placement
and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency. For a child who ran
away or whose whereabouts are unknown at the time of removal, the title
IV-E agency would indicate the date they received placement and care
responsibility. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We propose
to continue this data element consistent with section 479(c)(3)(C) of
the Act which requires that the data collection system include
characteristics of children entering out-of-home care. This information
is also used in the annual outcomes report to Congress.
Removal transaction date. In paragraph (d)(2), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report the transaction date for each
of the child's removal dates reported in paragraph (d)(1) using a non-
modifiable, computer-generated date which accurately indicates the
month, day and year each response to paragraph (d)(1) was entered into
the information system. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
propose to continue this data element consistent with section 479(c)(2)
of the Act which requires the collection of this data element in order
to assure that the data collected is reliable and consistent over time.
Environment at removal. In paragraph (d)(3), we propose to require
the title IV-E agency to report the type of environment (household or
facility) from a list of seven that the child was living in at the time
of each of the child's removals reported in paragraph (d)(1). This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data
element because it enables us to analyze removals of children over time
for technical assistance and monitoring.
Child and family circumstances at removal. In paragraph (d)(4), we
propose to require the title IV-E agency to report all of the
circumstances surrounding the child and family at each removal reported
in paragraph (d)(1) from a list of 34 circumstances. The agency must
report all child and family circumstances that are present at the time
of each removal, including the circumstances that contributed to the
decision to place the child into out-of-home care. We continue to
propose this data element because multiple sections of the Act require
the information that will be reported in the circumstances: Section
479(c)(3)(C) of the Act requires identification of the characteristics
of children placed in foster care, the annual outcomes report to
Congress must contain information on children placed in a child care
institution with special needs or another diagnosed mental or physical
illness or condition, per section 479A(a)(7)(A)(i)(III) of the Act, and
section 471(d) of the Act requires an annual report to Congress
regarding information on children and youth who are sex trafficking
victims. We propose to make only minor revisions to three circumstances
which are in paragraphs (d)(4)(ix), (xxvi), and (xxx). In paragraph
(d)(4)(ix) Abandonment, we propose to revise the instruction to not
include a child who is left at a ``safe haven'' and in paragraph
(d)(4)(xxvi) Voluntary relinquishment for adoption, we propose to
include the instruction that this includes a child who is left at a
``safe haven.'' We understand from providing technical assistance to
title IV-E agencies that there may be specific laws and policies in the
states that separate children who are ``abandoned'' from those who are
left at a ``safe haven'' and a better reflection of this in the data is
to include children left at a ``safe haven'' under paragraph
(d)(4)(xxvi) Voluntary relinquishment for adoption. In paragraph
(d)(4)(xxx) Family conflict related to child's sexual orientation,
gender identity, or gender expression, we modified the data element
definition to define it as the child's expressed or perceived sexual
orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or any conflict
related to the ways in which a child manifests masculinity or
femininity. These revisions clarify the purpose of the circumstance,
which is to know whether the child's expression or the caregiver's
perception of the child's sexual orientation or gender identity is a
circumstance associated with the child's removal. The rest of the
circumstances are unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
Victim of sex trafficking prior to entering foster care. In
paragraph (d)(5), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report
whether the child had been a victim of sex trafficking before the
current out-of-home care episode and if yes, the agency must indicate
whether it reported each instance to law enforcement and the dates of
each report. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(E)(i) of the Act
requires the data system collection include an annual number of
children who were victims of sex trafficking prior to entering foster
care and this information will inform reports required in sections
471(a)(34)(B) and 471(d) of the Act on children and youth reported to
be sex trafficking victims.
Victim of sex trafficking while in foster care. In paragraph
(d)(6), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether
the child was a victim of sex trafficking while in out-of-home care
during the current episode and if yes, the agency must indicate whether
it reported each instance to law enforcement and the dates of each
report. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(E)(ii) of the Act
requires the data system collection include an annual number of
children who were victims of sex trafficking while in foster care and
this information will inform reports required in sections 471(a)(34)(B)
and 471(d) of the Act on children and youth reported to be sex
trafficking victims.
Section 1355.44(e) Living Arrangement and Provider Information
In paragraph (e), we propose that the title IV-E agency collect and
report information on each of the child's living arrangements for each
out-of-home care episode.
Date of living arrangement. In paragraph (e)(1), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report the date of each living
arrangement. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act
requires that the data collection system include the length of
placement in an out-of-home care setting.
Foster family home. In paragraph (e)(2), we propose to require the
title IV-E agency to report whether or not a child resides in a foster
family home for each living arrangement. If the title IV-E agency
reports ``yes'', then the agency must complete paragraph (e)(3). This
is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act requires that the data
collection system
[[Page 16583]]
include the length and type of placement.
Foster family home type. In paragraph (e)(3), we propose to require
the title IV-E agency to report the foster family home type. The title
IV-E agency must indicate whether each of the following proposed foster
family home types ``applies'' or ``does not apply'': licensed home,
therapeutic foster family home, shelter care foster family home,
relative foster family home, pre-adoptive home, and kin foster family
home. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act
requires that the data collection system include the type of placement
for the child.
Other living arrangement type. In paragraph (e)(4), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report whether a child is placed in
one of 14 living arrangements for a child who is not placed in a foster
family home, as indicated in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, for each
living arrangement. The proposed living arrangement types are mutually
exclusive and are as follows: ``group home-family-operated'', ``group
home-staff-operated'', ``group home-shelter care'', ``residential
treatment center'', ``qualified residential treatment program'',
``child care institution'', ``child care institution-shelter care'',
``supervised independent living'', ``juvenile justice facility'',
``medical or rehabilitative facility'', ``psychiatric hospital'',
``runaway'', ``whereabouts unknown'', and ``placed at home''. We
propose to modify the list of options from the 2016 final rule to
include a ``qualified residential treatment program'' as a new
placement option per revisions made by Public Law 115-123 at section
472(k)(2)(A) and (4) of the Act to add these specialized placements
where children may be placed. Qualified residential treatment programs
must meet specific requirements outlined at section 472(k)(4) of the
Act and should not be reported under the response option ``residential
treatment centers.'' We also propose to modify the definition of the
response option ``residential treatment center'' to include when the
child is placed with a parent who is in a licensed residential family-
based treatment facility for substance abuse per section 472(j) of the
Act. We propose this revision due to the changes made by Public Law
115-123 at section 472(j) of the Act to allow foster care maintenance
payments for a child placed with a parent in these specified
placements. We propose to modify the definition of the response option
``child care institution'' to include a setting specializing in
providing prenatal, post-partum, or parenting supports for youth per
section 472(k)(2)(B) of the Act, and a setting providing high-quality
residential care and supportive services to children and youth who have
been found to be, or are at risk of becoming, sex trafficking victims
per section 472(k)(2)(D) of the Act. We propose this revision due to
the changes made by Public Law 115-123 at section 472(k) of the Act.
The other response options are unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(B) of
the Act requires that the data collection system include the type of
placement. The annual outcomes report to Congress must contain
information on children placed in a child care institution or other
setting that is not a foster family home including the type of the
placement setting, per section 479A(a)(7)(A) of the Act.
Location of living arrangement. In paragraph (e)(5), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report the location of each living
arrangement. The proposed locations are as follows: ``Out-of-State or
out-of-Tribal service area''; ``In-State or in-Tribal service area'';
``Out-of-country''; and ``Runaway or whereabouts unknown''. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(C) of the Act requires that the data
collection system include information on children placed in foster care
outside the title IV-E agency that has placement and care
responsibility.
Jurisdiction or country where child is living. In paragraph (e)(6),
we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report and name the
jurisdiction or country where the child is living in a format according
to ACF's specifications. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(B) of
the Act requires that the data collection system include information on
children placed in foster care outside the title IV-E agency that has
placement and care responsibility. Further, this information will be
used to inform the information provided in paragraph (e)(5).
Marital status of the foster parent(s). In paragraph (e)(7), we
propose to require the title IV-E agency to report foster parent's
marital status. The marital status response options are as follows:
``married couple'', ``unmarried couple'', ``separated'', and ``single
adult''. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the collection of comprehensive national information on the
demographic characteristics of foster parents. Also, this information
is currently used to inform recruitment campaigns for foster parents.
Child's relationship to the foster parent(s). In paragraph (e)(8),
we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the child's
relationship to the foster parent(s). We propose to simplify the
response options from the 2016 final rule from seven to three:
``relative(s)'', ``nonrelative(s)'', and ``kin''. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the collection of comprehensive national information on the
demographic characteristics of foster parents. However, we propose to
streamline the response options because primarily we are interested in
knowing whether the child's foster parent is a relative, nonrelative,
or kin. This will inform placement types and be used for foster parent
recruitment campaigns. However, the level of specificity in the 2016
final rule's response options serves no identified purpose.
Year of birth for foster parent(s). In paragraphs (e)(9) and (14),
we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the year of birth
of the foster parent(s). If there is no second foster parent, then the
title IV-E agency must leave paragraph (e)(14) blank. This is unchanged
from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data element
because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the collection of
comprehensive national information with respect to the demographic
characteristics of foster parents.
Foster parent(s) tribal membership. In paragraphs (e)(10) and (15),
we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the tribal
membership of the foster parent(s). If there is no second foster
parent, then the title IV-E agency must leave paragraph (e)(15) blank.
This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. Commenters to the ANPRM
noted that knowing whether the foster parents are members of an Indian
tribe will provide information related to ICWA placement preferences in
AFCARS.
Race of foster parent(s). In paragraphs (e)(11) and (16), we
propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the race of the
foster parent(s). If there is no second foster parent, then the title
IV-E agency must leave paragraph (e)(16) blank. This is unchanged from
the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the collection of
comprehensive national information with respect to the demographic
characteristics of foster parents.
[[Page 16584]]
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of foster parent(s). In paragraphs
(e)(12) and (17), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the foster parent(s). If there is
no second foster parent, then the title IV-E agency must leave
paragraph (e)(17) blank. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
continue to propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(A) of
the Act requires the collection of comprehensive national information
with respect to the demographic characteristics of foster parents.
Sex of foster parent(s). In paragraphs (e)(13) and (18), we propose
to require the title IV-E agency to report the sex of the foster
parent(s). If there is no second foster parent, then the title IV-E
agency must leave paragraph (e)(18) blank. The response options are
unchanged from the 2016 final rule; the only change is to the name of
the data element, from ``gender'' to ``sex''. We propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(A) of the Act requires the collection
of comprehensive national information with respect to the demographic
characteristics of foster parents. Commenters to the ANPRM suggested
that the data element ``gender'' in the 2016 final rule be revised to
reflect a gender other than male or female, but HHS did not identify a
compelling reason to increase the reporting burden by requesting the
provision of this information, which might not be collected
consistently.
Section 1355.44(f) Permanency Planning
In paragraph (f), we propose that the title IV-E agency collect and
report information related to permanency planning for children in out-
of-home care, which includes permanency plans, hearings, and caseworker
visits with the child.
Permanency plan and date. In paragraph (f)(1), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report each permanency plan
established for the child. The proposed permanency plan options are as
follows: ``reunify with parent(s) or legal guardian(s)''; ``live with
other relatives''; ``adoption''; ``guardianship''; ``planned permanent
living arrangement''; and ``permanency plan not established''. In
paragraph (f)(2), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report
the date of each permanency plan. These data elements are unchanged
from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose these data elements
because section 479(c)(3)(B) of the Act requires that the data
collection system include the goals for ending or continuing foster
care and this information is used in the annual outcomes report to
Congress.
Date of periodic review(s) and permanency hearing(s). In paragraph
(f)(3), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the date
of each periodic review, either by a court, or an administrative review
(as defined in section 475(6) of the Act) that meets the requirements
of section 475(5)(B) of the Act. In paragraph (f)(4), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report the date of each permanency
hearing held by a court or an administrative body appointed or approved
by the court that meets the requirements of section 475(5)(C) of the
Act. These data elements are unchanged from the 2016 final rule. This
information will be used for title IV-B/IV-E program monitoring via the
CFSR and having this information in AFCARS will allow us to more
accurately assess the quality and frequency of these hearings/reviews.
Caseworker visit dates and locations. In paragraph (f)(5), we
propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the date of each in-
person, face-to-face caseworker visit with the child, consistent with
section 422(b)(17) of the Act. In paragraph (f)(6), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report each caseworker visit location
from two response options: ``Child's residence'' and ``other
location.'' These data elements are unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
Currently, information on caseworker visits to meet the requirements of
section 424(f) and 479A(a)(6) of the Act is reported via the CFSP and
annual updates. Reporting this information in AFCARS instead will
improve the accuracy of the data and alleviate the burden of agencies
having to report on this as a narrative in the CFSP and annual updates.
Section 1355.44(g) General Exit Information
In paragraph (g), we propose that the title IV-E agency collect and
report exit information for each out-of-home care episode. An exit
occurs when the title IV-E agency's placement and care responsibility
of the child ends.
Date of exit. In paragraph (g)(1), we propose to require the title
IV-E agency to report the date for each of the child's exits from out-
of-home care. If this data element is applicable, the data elements in
paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) of this section must have a response. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We propose to continue this data
element consistent with section 479(c)(3) of the Act which requires
that the data collection system include the length of a child's
placement in out-of-home care. This information is also used in the
annual outcomes report to Congress that measures the length of time
children are in foster care, re-entry rates, and permanency and
calculating awards for the adoption and guardianship incentives payment
program under section 473A of the Act.
Exit transaction date. In paragraph (g)(2), we propose to require
the title IV-E agency to report a non-modifiable, computer-generated
date which accurately indicates the date of each response to paragraph
(g)(1) of this section. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We
propose to continue this data element consistent with section 479(c)(2)
of the Act which requires that the data collected is reliable and
consistent over time.
Exit reason. In paragraph (g)(3), we propose to require the title
IV-E agency to report the reason for each of the child's exits from
out-of-home care. The proposed exit reasons are as follows: ``not
applicable''; ``reunify with parents/legal guardian''; ``live with
other relatives''; ``adoption''; ``emancipation''; ``guardianship'';
``runaway or whereabouts unknown''; ``death of child''; and ``transfer
to another agency''. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. This
information in combination with the date of exit is used in the annual
outcomes report to Congress that measures the length of time children
are in foster care, re-entry rates, and permanency.
Transfer to another agency. In paragraph (g)(4), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report the type of agency that
received placement and care responsibility for the child if the title
IV-E agency indicated the child was transferred to another agency in
paragraph (g)(3). The proposed agency types are: ``state title IV-E
agency''; ``tribal title IV-E agency''; ``Indian tribe or tribal agency
(non-IV-E)''; ``juvenile justice agency''; ``mental health agency'';
``other public agency''; and ``private agency''. This is unchanged from
the 2016 final rule. This information is used to provide further
information on the transfer indicated in paragraph (g)(3) that aids in
data accuracy consistent with the requirement for reliable and
consistent data in section 479(c)(2) of the Act.
Section 1355.44(h) Exit to Adoption and Guardianship Information
In paragraph (h), we propose that the title IV-E agency collect and
report information only if the title IV-E agency indicated the child
exited to adoption or legal guardianship in Exit reason paragraph
(g)(3) of this section. Otherwise, the title IV-E agency must leave
paragraph (h) blank.
[[Page 16585]]
Marital status of the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s). In
paragraph (h)(1), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report
the marital status of the adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s). The
marital status response options are as follows: ``married couple'';
``married but individually adopting or obtaining legal guardianship'';
``unmarried couple''; and ``single adult''. This is unchanged from the
2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data element because
section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act requires the
collection of comprehensive national information with respect to the
demographic characteristics of adoptive parents and of children who
exit from foster care. Additionally, this information will inform
permanency outcomes information and adoption recruitment campaigns.
Child's relationship to the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s). In
paragraph (h)(2), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report
the type of relationship between the child and the adoptive parent(s)
or legal guardian(s). We propose to simplify the response options from
the 2016 final rule from seven to four: ``relative(s)'';
``nonrelative(s)''; ``foster parent(s)''; and ``kin''. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i)
of the Act requires the collection of comprehensive national
information on the demographic characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care. However, we propose to streamline
the response options because primarily we are interested in knowing
whether the child's adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) is a relative,
nonrelative, or kin to inform permanency outcomes data and family
recruitment. However, the level of specificity in the 2016 final rule's
response options serves no identified purpose.
Date of birth of the adoptive parent or guardian. In paragraph
(h)(3) and (8), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report
the date of the birth of the adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
The title IV-E agency must leave (h)(8) blank if there is no second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of the couple. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act
requires the collection of comprehensive national information with
respect to the demographic characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care. Additionally, this information will
inform permanency outcomes information and adoption recruitment
campaigns.
Adoptive parent or guardian tribal membership. In paragraph (h)(4)
and (9), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether
the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) is a member of an Indian tribe.
The title IV-E agency must leave paragraph (h)(9) blank if there is no
second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of the couple.
This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. Commenters to the ANPRM
noted that knowing whether the adoptive parents or legal guardians are
members of an Indian tribe will provide information related to ICWA
placement preferences in AFCARS. Additionally, this information will
inform permanency outcomes information and adoption recruitment
campaigns.
Race of adoptive parent or guardian. In paragraph (h)(5) and
(h)(10), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the
adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s)'s race as determined by the
individual. The title IV-E agency must leave paragraph (h)(10) blank if
there is no second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of
the couple. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to
propose this data element because section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i)
of the Act requires the collection of comprehensive national
information with respect to the demographic characteristics of adoptive
parents and children who exit from foster care.
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first adoptive parent or guardian.
In paragraph (h)(6) and (h)(11), we propose to require the title IV-E
agency to report whether the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) is of
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity as determined by the individual. The title
IV-E agency must leave paragraph (h)(11) blank if there is no second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of the couple. This is
unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act
requires the collection of comprehensive national information with
respect to the demographic characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care.
Sex of first adoptive parent or guardian. In paragraph (h)(7) and
(12), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the sex of
the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s). The title IV-E agency must leave
paragraph (h)(12) blank if there is no second adoptive parent, legal
guardian, or other member of the couple. The response options are
unchanged from the 2016 final rule; the only change is to the name of
the data element, from ``gender'' to ``sex''. We propose this data
element because section 479(c)(3)(A) and (c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act
requires the collection of comprehensive national information with
respect to the demographic characteristics of adoptive parents and
children who exit from foster care. Additionally, this information will
inform permanency outcomes information and adoption recruitment
campaigns. While some agencies currently allow individuals to identify
as a gender other than male or female and commenters to the ANPRM
suggested that the data element ``gender'' in the final 2016 rule be
revised to reflect a gender other than male or female, but HHS did not
identify a compelling reason to increase the reporting burden by
requesting the provision of this information, which might not be
collected consistently.
Inter/Intrajurisdictional adoption or guardianship. In paragraph
(h)(13), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to report whether
the child was placed within the state or tribal service area, outside
of the state or tribal service area or into another country for
adoption or legal guardianship. The proposed placement types are as
follows: ``interjurisdictional adoption or guardianship'';
``intercountry adoption or guardianship''; and ``intrajurisdictional
adoption or guardianship''. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule.
We continue to propose this data element to inform permanency outcomes
information, adoption recruitment campaigns, and statutorily mandated
efforts to remove barriers to placing children for adoption in a timely
manner per section 471(a)(23) of the Act.
Assistance agreement type. In paragraph (h)(14), we propose to
require the title IV-E agency to report the type of assistance
agreement between the title IV-E agency and the adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s). The proposed assistant agreement types are as
follows: ``Title IV-E adoption assistance agreement;'' ``State/tribal
adoption assistance agreement;'' ``Adoption-Title IV-E agreement non-
recurring expenses only;'' ``Adoption-Title IV-E agreement Medicaid
only;'' ``Title IV-E guardianship assistance agreement;'' ``State/
tribal guardianship assistance agreement;'' or ``no agreement''. This
is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue to propose this data
element because it is used in calculations for the adoption and
guardianship incentives payment program under section 473A of the Act.
[[Page 16586]]
Siblings in adoptive or guardianship home. In paragraph (h)(15), we
propose to require the title IV-E agency to report the number of
siblings of the child who are in the same adoptive or guardianship home
as the child. This is unchanged from the 2016 final rule. We continue
to propose this data element so that the information reported can be
used with other AFCARS data elements to assess nationally the current
state of the well-being of children adopted or in a legal guardianship
as part of monitoring the title IV-E and IV-B programs through the
CFSR.
Section 1355.45 Adoption and Guardianship Assistance Data File
This section states the data element descriptions for the adoption
and guardianship assistance data file. The data elements in this
section are unchanged from 2016 final rule with the exceptions
described below.
In paragraph (b)(2), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to
report the sex of the child using the response options of ``male or''
``female''. The response options are unchanged from the 2016 final
rule; the only change is to the name of the data element, from
``gender'' to ``sex''. Commenters to the ANPRM suggested that the data
element ``gender'' in the 2016 rule be revised to reflect a gender
other than male or female, but HHS did not identify a compelling reason
to increase the reporting burden by requesting the provision of this
information, which might not be collected consistently.
In paragraph (b)(3)(vi), for Race-unknown, we added instructions
that this paragraph must be reported if the child or parent or legal
guardian does not know, or is unable to communicate the race, or at
least one race of the child is not known. We also clarified that this
category does not apply when the child has been abandoned or the
parents failed to return and the identity of the child, parent(s), or
legal guardian(s) is known. We made these clarifying edits to match
edits we propose in section 1355.44(b)(7)(vi).
In paragraph (f), we propose to require the title IV-E agency to
indicate the agency that placed the child for adoption or legal
guardianship from the following three options: ``title IV-E agency'';
``private agency under agreement''; and ``Indian tribe under contract/
agreement''. In the 2016 final rule, this data element was required to
be reported in the out-of-home care data file in section
1355.44(h)(17). However, as we examined AFCARS per E.O. 13777, we noted
that this information needs to be reported as part of the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file because we must know the placing
agency in order to calculate the awards for adoption incentive payments
for ``preadolescent child'' adoptions per section 473A(g)(6)(B) and
``older child'' adoptions per section 473A(g)(7)(B) of the Act. Thus,
instead of requiring title IV-E agencies to report this information in
the out-of-home care data file, we propose to require it be reported in
the adoption and guardianship assistance data file.
Section 1355.46 Compliance
This section states compliance requirements for AFCARS data. The
compliance requirements in this section are unchanged from 2016 final
rule and state the type of assessments ACF will conduct to determine
the accuracy of a title IV-E agency's data, the data that is subject to
these assessments, the compliance standards and the manner in which the
title IV-E agency initially determined to be out of compliance can
correct its data. We propose to amend paragraph (c)(2) to update the
cross references in this section to mirror the proposed revisions to
sections 1355.44 and 1355.45.
VII. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
ACF consulted with OMB and determined that this proposed rule does meet
the criteria for a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
Thus, it was subject to OMB review. ACF determined that the costs to
title IV-E agencies as a result of this proposed rule will not be
economically significant as defined in E.O. 12866 (have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state,
local, or tribal governments or communities). As required in E.O.
12866, a cost-benefit analysis needs is included in this proposed rule.
Executive Order 13771, entitled Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs (82 FR 9339), was issued on January 30, 2017. This
rule, if finalized, is considered an E.O. 13771 deregulatory action.
Annualizing these costs and cost savings in perpetuity and discounting
at 7 percent back to 2016, we estimate that this rule would generate
$29.9 million in annualized cost savings discounted relative to 2016 at
7 percent over a perpetual time horizon, in 2016 dollars. Details on
the estimated costs of this rule can be found in the Paperwork
Reduction Act analysis. This proposed rule is considered an E.O. 13771
deregulatory action. As described below, this NPRM will save
approximately 544,337 burden hours. After multiplying by the average
wage rate of affected individuals, this amounts to $39,192,264 in
savings each year, relative to the estimated costs and burden of the
2016 final rule, in the year this NPRM (when finalized) will become
effective, which is in FY 2021. We used the information that states
provided in comments to the ANPRM on the cost and burden associated
with implementing the 2016 final rule as the basis for these burden
estimate calculations and reduced it by 33 percent to represent the
reduction in the workload associated with reporting the data proposed
in this NPRM relative to the 2016 final rule. We relied on this
approach because of the type of data elements that we removed, which
specifically were qualitative in nature and required a significant
amount of training and staff time to locate the information and ensure
proper data entry.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Secretary certifies, under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), as enacted by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354), that this rule will not
result in a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule does not affect small entities because it
is applicable only to state and tribal title IV-E agencies.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies
to prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before
proposing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation). In
2018, that threshold is approximately $150 million. This proposed rule
does not impose any mandates on state, local, or tribal governments, or
the private sector that will result in an annual expenditure of $150
million or more.
[[Page 16587]]
Congressional Review
This regulation is not a major rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. 8.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-58) requires federal agencies to determine
whether a policy or regulation may affect family well-being. If the
agency's determination is affirmative, then the agency must prepare an
impact assessment addressing seven criteria specified in the law. This
final regulation will not have an impact on family well-being as
defined in the law.
Executive Order 13132
E.O. 13132 requires that federal agencies consult with state and
local government officials in the development of regulatory policies
with federalism implications. Consistent with E.O. 13132 and Guidance
for Implementing E.O. 13132 issued on October 28, 1999, the Department
must include in ``a separately identified portion of the preamble to
the regulation'' a ``federalism summary impact statement'' (Secs.
6(b)(2)(B) & (c)(2)). The Department's federalism summary impact
statement is as follows--
``A description of the extent of the agency's prior
consultation with state and local officials''--The public comment
period is open for 60 days wherein we solicit comments via
regulations.gov, email, and postal mail. During this comment period, we
will hold informational calls.
``A summary of the nature of their concerns and the
agency's position supporting the need to issue the regulation''--As we
discussed in sections II and III of the preamble to this proposed rule,
state commenters support making revisions to streamline the AFCARS
regulation. However, Indian tribes, organizations representing tribal
interests, and most other national advocacy organizations,
universities, private individuals, and other groups opposed
streamlining. We took the comments into consideration and believe that
based on our analysis of the comments, the best way to reduce the
burden to title IV-E agencies, who are required to submit the data to
ACF and will be held to penalties for non-compliant data submissions,
is to propose revisions to the AFCARS regulation through a NPRM. We
believe that the states sufficiently argued through detailed work and
cost estimates in response to the ANPRM that the 2016 final rule has
many data elements that can be streamlined while still providing
critical information on the reporting population.
``A statement of the extent to which the concerns of state
and local officials have been met'' (Secs. 6(b)(2)(B) and 6(c)(2))--As
we discussed in the section-by-section discussion preamble, we propose
in the NPRM fewer data elements than is in the 2016 final rule, many of
which were identified in state comments to the ANPRM to be overly
burdensome for numerous reasons. We believe that these reduced data
requirements balance the need for updated information with the burden
to comply with AFCARS requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains information collection requirements (ICRs)
that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. A
description of these provisions is given in the following paragraphs
with an estimate of the annual burden. To fairly evaluate whether an
information collection should be approved by OMB, the Department
solicits comment on the following issues:
The need for the information collection and its usefulness
in carrying out the proper functions of our agency.
The accuracy of our estimate of the information collection
burden.
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected.
Recommendations to minimize the information collection
burden on the affected public, including automated collection
techniques.
Information collection for AFCARS is currently authorized under OMB
number 0970-0422. This proposed rule contains information collection
requirements in proposed Sec. 1355.44, the out-of-home care data file,
and Sec. 1355.45, the adoption and guardianship assistance data file,
that the Department has submitted to OMB for its review. We propose:
State and tribal title IV-E agencies to report information
on children who are in the out-of-home care reporting population per
Sec. 1355.42(a),
State and tribal title IV-E agencies to report information
on children who are in the adoption and guardianship assistance
reporting population per Sec. 1355.42(b), and
State title IV-E agencies to report ICWA-related
information in the out-of-home care data file.
Burden Estimate
The following are estimates.
Through the ANPRM, ACF asked the public to give specific feedback
on the AFCARS data elements, costs to implement, and burden hours to
complete the work required to comply with the AFCARS requirements in
2016 final rule. The ANPRM listed questions specifically asking the
public to identify the data elements that are overly burdensome for
title IV-E agencies, an explanation with cost and burden estimates for
recordkeeping, reporting, and recommendations on data elements to
retain, simplify, and remove with justifications. Section II of the
preamble provides a summary and analysis of the ANPRM comments.
Regarding burden, the state commenters provided estimates for the
recordkeeping and reporting burden hours to implement the 2016 final
rule. This included identifying the staff positions that we used to
determine the labor rate, hour estimates for searching data sources,
gathering information, entering the information into the system,
developing or modifying procedures and systems to collect, validate,
and verify the information and adjusting existing ways to comply with
AFCARS requirements, and training personnel on AFCARS requirements. We
used the estimates provided by states to determine the cost to
implement the 2016 final rule. In this section, we discuss our
assumptions for the estimates and calculations for estimates.
For the 2016 final rule, based on the state ANPRM comments, we
estimate the total burden of the 2016 final rule to be 1,768,744 hours.
We estimated this by using either the median or the average of the
states' estimates for the various recordkeeping and reporting tasks and
adding them together. States ranged considerably in estimating the work
needed and length of time it would take to comply with the 2016 final
rule, which is expected and appropriate because there is considerable
variability across states in sophistication of information systems,
availability of both staff and financial resources, and populations of
children in care. Thus, we used the median of the states' estimates for
the estimates related to training and developing or modifying
procedures and systems. We used the average of the states' estimates
for the estimates of gathering/entering information, reporting, and the
labor rate.
To estimate the burden of this NPRM, we used the estimates to
implement the 2016 final rule and reduced the recordkeeping hours and
reporting hours by approximately 33 percent. This represents the
approximate workload reduction associated with reporting
[[Page 16588]]
fewer data elements as proposed in this NPRM.
Respondents: The 66 respondents comprise 52 state title IV-E
agencies and 14 tribal title IV-E agencies, which are Indian tribes,
tribal organizations or consortium with an approved title IV-E plan
under section 479B of the Act. The estimates provided in the NPRM are
spread across respondents for the purposes of the PRA estimates;
however, we understand based on the ANPRM comments that actual burden
hours and costs will vary due to sophistication and capacity of
information systems, availability of staff and financial resources, and
populations of children in care.
Recordkeeping burden: Searching data sources, gathering
information, and entering the information into the system, developing
or modifying procedures and systems to collect, validate, and verify
the information and adjusting existing ways to comply with AFCARS
requirements, administrative tasks associated with training personnel
on the AFCARS requirements (e.g., reviewing instructions, developing
the training and manuals), and training personnel on AFCARS
requirements.
Reporting burden: Extracting the information for AFCARS reporting
and transmitting the information to ACF.
Annualized Cost to the Federal Government
Federal reimbursement under title IV-E will be available for a
portion of the costs that title IV-E agencies will incur as a result of
the revisions proposed in this rule, depending on each agency's cost
allocation plan, information system, and other factors. For this
estimate, we used the 50% Federal Financial Participation (FFP) rate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate
Collection--AFCARS Total annual Average hourly Total cost Federal costs
burden hours labor rate (50% FFP)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping................................... 1,212,163 $72 $87,275,736 $43,637,868
Reporting....................................... 2,244 72 161,568 80,784
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. .............. .............. 43,718,652
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost savings of NPRM: 544,337 hours x $72 labor rate = $39,192,264
Assumptions for Estimates
We made a number of assumptions when calculating the burden and
costs that were informed by the states' estimates provided in their
comments to the ANPRM:
Number of children in out-of-home care: To determine the
number of children for which title IV-E agencies will have to report in
the out-of-home care data file on average, ACF used the most recent FY
2016 AFCARS data available: 273,539 children entered in foster care
during FY 2016. Of those, 6,033 children had a reported race of
American Indian/Alaska Native. We used the number of children who
entered foster care rather than the entire population of children in
foster care because agencies will not have to collect and report all
data elements on all children in foster care; therefore, this accounts
for the variances in burden. This is consistent with the 2016 final
rule and the 2016 final rule is what we use to estimate the relative
savings of this NPRM.
Out-of-home care data elements: For the out-of-home care
data file, the 2016 final rule required approximately 272 items where
we require title IV-E agencies to report information. In this NPRM, we
propose to reduce these points to approximately 183, representing 170
that we propose to keep from the 2016 final rule and 13 we propose to
modify. This represents approximately a 33 percent reduction in the
total items that we propose agencies to report in this NPRM.
Number of children receiving adoption and guardianship
assistance: To determine the number of children for which title IV-E
agencies must report in the adoption and guardianship assistance file,
ACF used the most recent title IV-E Programs Quarterly Financial
Report, CB-496, for FY 2016: 456,715 children received title IV-E
adoption assistance and 24,689 children received guardianship
assistance.
Adoption and guardianship assistance data elements: There
are approximately 19 items where we require title IV-E agencies report
information for the adoption and guardianship assistance data file,
which is not a significant change from the 2016 final rule.
Systems changes: ACF assumed that the burden for title IV-
E agencies to modify systems based in part on the estimates states'
provided in response to the ANPRM. Additionally, as of July 2018, 29
states and tribes have declared as moving forward with a new or
transitional Comprehensive Child Welfare Information Systems (CCWIS)
(see also 45 CFR 1355.50 et seq. for requirements). ACF recognizes that
most title IV-E agencies will require revisions to electronic case
management systems to meet the requirements proposed in this NPRM. As
more title IV-E agencies build CCWIS, ACF anticipates it will lead to
more efficiency in reporting and less costs and burden associated with
reporting AFCARS data.
Labor rate: Based on the state comments to the ANPRM, ACF
assumes that there will be a mix of the following positions working to
meet both the one-time and annual requirements of this proposed rule.
We reviewed 2017 Bureau of Labor Statistics data and for this estimate,
we used the job roles of: Information technology (IT) and computer
programming, administrative, management, caseworkers, subject matter
experts, and legal staff. For this estimate, we used the job roles of:
Computer Information and Systems Managers (11-3021) with an average
hourly wage of $71.99, Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
(e.g., computer and information analysts, computer programmers, and
database and systems administrators) with an average hourly wage of
$43.18, Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-000) (e.g.,
administrative assistants, data entry, legal secretaries, government
program eligibility interviewers, information and record clerks) with
an average hourly wage of $18.24, Social and Community Service Managers
(11-9151) with an average hourly wage estimate of $33.91, Community and
Social Service Operations (21-0000) (e.g., Social Workers, Child and
Family Social Workers, Counselors, Social Service Specialists) with an
average hourly wage of $23.10, and Paralegals and Legal Assistants (23-
2011) with an average hourly wage estimate of $25.92. Thus, ACF
averaged these wages to come to an average labor rate of $36.05. In
order to ensure we took into account overhead costs associated with
these labor costs, ACF doubled this rate ($72).
[[Page 16589]]
Calculations for Estimates
We used the information that states provided in comments to the
ANPRM on the cost and burden associated with implementing the 2016
final rule as the basis for these burden estimate calculations. Thus,
for these estimates, we are using the states' estimates and reducing
them by 33 percent to represent the reduction in the workload
associated with reporting the data proposed in this NPRM. We relied on
this approach because of the type of data elements that we removed,
which specifically were qualitative in nature and required a
significant amount of training and staff time to locate the information
and ensure proper data entry.
Recordkeeping: Adding the bullets below produces a total of
1,212,163 record keeping hours annually, as summarized below.
For the out-of-home care data file, searching data
sources, gathering information, and entering the information into the
system would take on average 4.02 hours annually for all children who
enter foster care, for a total of 1,099,627 hours annually. States
provided estimates that ranged from 3 to 15 hours related to these
tasks for the 2016 final rule. The range depended on whether the work
was for the ICWA-related data elements or not. The average of the hours
provided from the states that broke out this information in their ANPRM
comments was 6 hours annually. We used the average because there were
not significant outliers in the comments provided. For the purposes of
this NPRM estimate, we reduced the 6 hours by 33 percent since that
represents the reduction in data elements to be reported per this NPRM,
which is 4.02 hours. (4.02 hours x 273,539 children = 1,099,627 annual
hours for this bullet.)
For the adoption and guardianship assistance data file, we
estimated in the 2016 final rule that updates or changes on an annual
or biennial basis will take an average of 0.2 hours annually for
records of children who have an adoption assistance agreement and 0.3
hours annually for children who have a guardianship assistance
agreement. The data elements in the adoption and guardianship
assistance data file did not significantly change and we did not
receive information from state estimates to determine that a change in
these estimates was warranted. As noted earlier, the number of children
in adoption or guardianship assistance agreements increased, which
reflects the most recent data available, FY 2016. The new total annual
hours is estimated to be 98,750. (0.2 hours x 456,715 children = 91,343
hours. 0.3 hours x 24,689 children = 7,407 hours. 91,343 hours + 7,407
hours = 98,750 total annual burden hours for this bullet.)
Developing or modifying standard operating procedures and
IT systems to collect, validate, and verify the information and adjust
existing ways to comply with the AFCARS requirements is estimated at
6,700 hours annually. States provided estimates in response to the
ANPRM that ranged from 1,000 to 20,000 hours, which varied widely
depending on the size of the state's out-of-home care population, type,
sophistication, and age of systems. To estimate the annual hours, we
chose to use the median of these estimates provided by the state
commenters, rather than relying on the average of those provided in the
comments, because it would be distorted by the considerable hour range.
The median hours from state's estimates was 10,000, and we reduced it
by 33 percent since that represents the reduction in data elements to
be reported per this NPRM, which is 6,700 hours. Thus, we estimate
6,700 hours annually for this bullet. (10,000 x 0.67 = 6,700 hours)
Administrative tasks associated with training personnel on
the AFCARS requirements (e.g., reviewing instructions, developing the
training and manuals) and training personnel on AFCARS requirements we
estimate will take on average 7,086 hours annually. In response to the
ANPRM, states provided varying estimates for the hours and cost of
training that were not broken out the same way. For example, one
estimate was 40 hours to develop training materials and 2 hours of
training per staff person. Other estimates were only totals of training
hours that ranged between 42,712 to 102,000 hours encompassing initial
and ongoing training to implement the 2016 final rule. Another estimate
broke out ongoing training at 8,500 hours annually. To estimate the
annual hours related to training tasks, we used the median of the hours
provided from the ANPRM comments, rather than relying on the average,
because it would be distorted by the considerable hour ranges and
associated tasks. We understand that training hours will vary depending
on the size of the agency's workforce needing training. The median
hours from state's estimates was 10,576, and we reduced it by 33
percent since that represents the reduction in data elements to be
reported per this NPRM, which is 7,086 hours. Thus we estimate 7,086
hours annually for this bullet. (10,576 x 0.67 = 7,086 hours)
Reporting: We estimate that extracting the information for AFCARS
reporting and transmitting the information to ACF would take on average
17 hours annually. Very few states broke out reporting in their ANPRM
comments and the average of the hours provided came to 26 hours. Since
the NPRM reduces the data elements by 33 percent, we reduced the
estimated burden related to reporting that amount. Thus we estimate 17
hours for this task. (26 x 0.67 = 17 hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden Total annual
Collection--AFCARS Number of responses per hours per burden hours
respondents respondent response for NPRM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping................................... 66 2 9,183 1,212,163
Reporting....................................... 66 2 17 2,244
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. .............. .............. 1,214,407
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title IV-E agencies must comply with the current AFCARS requirements in
45 CFR 1355.40 and the appendix to part 1355 until September 30, 2020
(45 CFR 1355.40, per the final rule on implementation delay published
August 21, 2018, 83 FR 42225). On October 1, 2020 (FY 2021), title IV-E
agencies must comply with the provisions of the 2016 final rule. When
this NPRM is finalized, title IV-E agencies must comply with the
provisions proposed in this NPRM, which is scheduled to begin on
October 1, 2020 (FY 2021), because this NPRM does not propose to change
the implementation date. Because we anticipate that this NPRM will be
finalized before the 2016 final rule becomes effective, the year in
which title IV-E agencies will experience savings from the 2016 final
rule is FY 2021. We used fiscal years in this estimate because AFCARS
data reporting periods are categorized by
[[Page 16590]]
fiscal years. The savings is generated by the reductions proposed in
this NPRM, which reduces the data that title IV-E agencies must report
from what was published in the 2016 final rule. As discussed above, we
estimate approximately a 33 percent reduction in the total items that
we propose agencies to report in this NPRM from the 2016 final rule, as
discussed previously. These charts represent the burden hour and cost
savings we estimate that this NPRM will have over the 2016 final rule's
requirements. This NPRM will save approximately 544,337 burden hours.
After multiplying by the average wage rate of affected individuals,
this amounts to $39,192,264 in savings each year relative to the 2016
final rule, in the year this NPRM (when finalized) will become
effective, FY 2021.
Savings of NPRM Relative to 2016 Final Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total annual
burden hours Total annual Difference
Burden hour savings of NPRM for 2016 final burden hours (hours)
rule for NPRM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2021...................................................... 1,768,744 1,214,407 554,337
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the above estimates, ACF acknowledges: (1) ACF has used average
figures for title IV-E agencies of very different sizes and of which,
some may have larger populations of children served than other
agencies, and (2) these are rough estimates based on the ANPRM comments
in which they ranged in the level of detail they provided regarding
burden hours, costs, and work needing to be completed.
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of
information contained in this regulation between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a
comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the deadline for
the public to comment to the Department on the proposed regulations.
Written comments to OMB or the proposed information collection should
be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget,
either by fax to 202-395-6974 or by email to
[email protected]. Please mark faxes and emails to the
attention of the desk officer for ACF.
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
ACF is committed to consulting with Indian tribes and tribal
leadership to the extent practicable and permitted by law, prior to
promulgating any regulation that has tribal implications and within the
requirements of E.O. 13175 Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments. Section II of this NPRM provides a summary and
analysis of the ANPRM comments. The comments to the ANPRM allowed us to
assess whether and how we could potentially reduce burden on title IV-E
agencies to report AFCARS data, per E.O. 13777, while still adhering to
the requirements of section 479 of the Act and collecting useful data
that will inform efforts to improve the child welfare system. This
includes assessing the need for ICWA-related data elements as strongly
illustrated by the tribal commenters. Additionally during the comment
period of the ANPRM, CB held consultation on May 15 and 16, 2018 where
the ANPRM and history of the AFCARS regulation, including the Executive
Order precipitating another look at AFCARS, was presented by CB
officials. During this time, tribal leaders, officials and
representatives identified the ICWA-related information they felt was
important to retain in AFCARS because it was essential in determining
whether ICWA applied for a child or it provided basic information on
ICWA's requirements. Prior to these information sessions, the ANPRM,
2016 final rule and other AFCARS supplementary information was linked
to on the CB website. Additionally, links to the ANPRM and the AFCARS
supplementary information was emailed to CB's tribal lists (on March
13, 2018 when the ANPRM was available for public inspection and March
15, 2018 when the ANPRM was published), and CB issued ACYF-CB-IM-18-01
(issued March 16, 2018). CB also issued ACYF-CB-IM-18-03 on August 21,
2018 announcing publication of the final rule regarding implementation
of the 2016 final rule and announcing our intent to issue a NPRM to
revise the data elements per the spring 2018 unified agenda. This was
also emailed to CB's tribal lists. Additionally, ACF held a tribal
consultation on November 6, 2017 during which tribes requested that ACF
leave the 2016 final rule in place, stating that the ICWA-related data
elements are very necessary for accountability. At a meeting with
tribal representatives at the Secretary's Tribal Advisory Committee on
May 9 and 10, 2018, representatives stated the following: They
supported the 2016 final rule, have concerns that states are not
following ICWA, that the ICWA-related data elements are critical to
informing Congress, HHS, states, and tribes on how Native children and
families are doing in state child welfare systems and that AFCARS
information would help inform issues such as foster care
disproportionality.
As we developed this proposed rule, we carefully considered the
comments to the ANPRM from Indian tribes and organizations representing
tribal interests, whose comments unequivocally supported keeping most,
if not all, ICWA-related data elements in AFCARS. However, we must
balance the need for data with the needs of our grantees, the title IV-
E agencies, that must revise their systems to meet new AFCARS
requirements and will ultimately be held accountable via compliance and
penalties to report the data. We look forward to engaging in
consultation during the comment period of this NPRM and to receiving
comments on this proposal.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1355
Adoption and foster care, Child welfare, Grant programs--social
programs.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 93.658,
Foster Care Maintenance; 93.659, Adoption Assistance; 93.645, Child
Welfare Services--State Grants).
Dated: February 5, 2019.
Lynn A. Johnson,
Assistant Secretary for Children and Families.
Approved: February 12, 2019.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, HHS and ACF propose to
amend 45 CFR part 1355 as follows:
PART 1355--GENERAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 1355 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 620 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 670 et seq., 42
U.S.C. 1302.
[[Page 16591]]
0
2. In Sec. 1355.41, revise paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Terms in Sec. Sec. 1355.41 through 1355.47 are defined as they
appear in Sec. 1355.20, except that for purposes of data elements
related to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA), terms that
appear in Sec. 1344.44(b)(3) through (6), (c)(3) and (4), (e)(10) and
(15), and (h)(4) and (9) are defined as they appear in 25 CFR 23.2 and
25 U.S.C. 1903.
(2) For state title IV-E agencies only: If the state title IV-E
agency indicated ``yes'' to Sec. 1355.44(b)(5)(i), for Sec.
1355.44(c)(1) and (2) and (d)(3), the term ``legal guardian'' includes
an Indian custodian as defined in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903 if the Indian
custodian has legal responsibility for the child.
0
3. In Sec. 1355.43, revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 1355.43 Data reporting requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) For a child who had an out-of-home care episode(s) as defined
in Sec. 1355.42(a) prior to October 1, 2020, the title IV-E agency
must report only the information for the data described in Sec.
1355.44(d)(1) and (g)(1) and (3) for the out-of-home care episode(s)
that occurred prior to October 1, 2020.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise Sec. 1355.44 to read as follows:
Sec. 1355.44 Out-of-home care data file elements.
(a) General information--(1) Title IV-E agency. Indicate the title
IV-E agency responsible for submitting the AFCARS data in a format
according to ACF's specifications.
(2) Report date. The report date corresponds with the end of the
report period. Indicate the last month and the year of the report
period.
(3) Local agency. Indicate the local county, jurisdiction, or
equivalent unit that has primary responsibility for the child in a
format according to ACF's specifications.
(4) Child record number. Indicate the child's record number. This
is an encrypted, unique person identification number that is the same
for the child, no matter where the child lives while in the placement
and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency in out-of-home care
and across all report periods and episodes. The title IV-E agency must
apply and retain the same encryption routine or method for the person
identification number across all report periods. The record number must
be encrypted in accordance with ACF standards.
(b) Child information--(1) Child's date of birth. Indicate the
month, day and year of the child's birth. If the actual date of birth
is unknown because the child has been abandoned, provide an estimated
date of birth. Abandoned means that the child was left alone or with
others and the identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a child left at a
``safe haven.''
(2) Child's sex. Indicate whether the child is ``male'' or
``female.''
(3) Reason to know a child is an ``Indian Child'' as defined in the
Indian Child Welfare Act. For state title IV-E agencies only: Indicate
whether the state title IV-E agency made inquiries whether the child is
an Indian child as defined in ICWA. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(4) Child's tribal membership. For state title IV-E agencies only:
(i) Indicate whether the child is a member of or eligible for
membership in an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or
``unknown''.
(ii) If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph
(b)(4)(i) of this section, indicate all federally recognized Indian
tribe(s) that may potentially be the Indian child's tribe(s). The title
IV-E agency must submit the information in a format according to ACF's
specifications.
(5) Application of ICWA. For state title IV-E agencies only:
(i) Indicate whether ICWA applies for the child. Indicate ``yes,''
``no,'' or ``unknown''.
(ii) If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph
(b)(5)(i) of this section, indicate the date that the state title IV-E
agency was notified by the Indian tribe or state or tribal court that
ICWA applies.
(6) Notification. For state title IV-E agencies only: If the state
title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this
section, the state title IV-E agency must indicate whether the Indian
child's tribe(s) was sent legal notice in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(a). Indicate ``yes'' or ``no''.
(7) Child's race. In general, a child's race is determined by the
child, the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate whether
each race category listed in paragraphs (b)(7)(i) through (vii) of this
section applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.''
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native child has origins in any of the original peoples of North
or South America (including Central America), and maintains tribal
affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian child has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian subcontinent
including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia,
Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
child has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander child has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A white child has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--unknown. The child or parent or legal guardian does not
know, or is unable to communicate the race, or at least one race of the
child is not known. This category does not apply when the child has
been abandoned or the parents failed to return and the identity of the
child, parent(s), or legal guardian(s) is known.
(vii) Race--abandoned. The child's race is unknown because the
child has been abandoned. Abandoned means that the child was left alone
or with others and the identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
is unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a child left at a
``safe haven.''
(viii) Race--declined. The child or parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
has declined to identify a race.
(8) Child's Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. In general, a child's
ethnicity is determined by the child or the child's parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). A child is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the child is
a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American or
other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether
this category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the child or the
child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) does not know or is unable to
communicate whether the child is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity,
indicate ``unknown.'' If the child is abandoned indicate ``abandoned.''
Abandoned means that the child was left alone or with others and the
identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.'' If the
child or the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) refuses to
[[Page 16592]]
identify the child's ethnicity, indicate ``declined.''
(9) Health assessment. Indicate whether the child had a health
assessment during the current out-of-home care episode. This assessment
could include an initial health screening or any follow-up health
screening per section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act. Indicate ``yes'' or
``no.''
(10) Health, behavioral or mental health conditions. Indicate
whether the child was diagnosed by a qualified professional, as defined
by the state or tribe, as having a health, behavioral or mental health
condition, prior to or during the child's current out-of-home care
episode as of the last day of the report period. Indicate ``child has a
diagnosed condition'' if a qualified professional has made such a
diagnosis and for each paragraph (b)(10)(i) through (xi) of this
section, indicate ``existing condition,'' ``previous condition'' or
``does not apply,'' as applicable. ``Previous condition'' means a
previous diagnoses that no longer exists as a current condition.
Indicate ``no exam or assessment conducted'' if a qualified
professional has not conducted a medical exam or assessment of the
child and leave paragraphs (b)(10)(i) through (xi) blank. Indicate
``exam or assessment conducted and none of the conditions apply'' if a
qualified professional has conducted a medical exam or assessment and
has concluded that the child does not have one of the conditions listed
and leave paragraphs (b)(10)(i) through (xi) of this section blank.
Indicate ``exam or assessment conducted but results not received'' if a
qualified professional has conducted a medical exam or assessment but
the title IV-E agency has not yet received the results of such an exam
or assessment and leave paragraphs (b)(10)(i) through (xi) of this
section blank.
(i) Intellectual disability. The child has, or had previously,
significantly sub-average general cognitive and motor functioning
existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior manifested
during the developmental period that adversely affect the child's
socialization and learning.
(ii) Autism spectrum disorder. The child has, or had previously, a
neurodevelopment disorder, characterized by social impairments,
communication difficulties, and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped
patterns of behavior. This includes the range of disorders from
autistic disorder, sometimes called autism or classical autism spectrum
disorder, to milder forms known as Asperger syndrome and pervasive
developmental disorder not otherwise specified.
(iii) Visual impairment and blindness. The child has, or had
previously, a visual impairment that may adversely affects the day-to-
day functioning or educational performance, such as blindness,
amblyopia, or color blindness.
(iv) Hearing impairment and deafness. The child has, or had
previously, an impairment in hearing, whether permanent or fluctuating,
that adversely affects the child's day-to-day functioning and
educational performance.
(v) Orthopedic impairment or other physical condition. The child
has, or had previously, a physical deformity, such as amputations and
fractures or burns that cause contractures, or an orthopedic
impairment, including impairments caused by a congenital anomalies or
disease, such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, or
muscular dystrophy.
(vi) Mental/emotional disorders. The child has, or had previously,
one or more mood or personality disorders or conditions over a long
period of time and to a marked degree, such as conduct disorder,
oppositional defiant disorder, emotional disturbance, anxiety disorder,
obsessive-compulsive disorder, or eating disorder.
(vii) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The child has, or
had previously, a diagnosis of the neurobehavioral disorders of
attention deficit or hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or attention deficit
disorder (ADD).
(viii) Serious mental disorders. The child has, or had previously,
a diagnosis of a serious mental disorder or illness, such as bipolar
disorder, depression, psychotic disorders, or schizophrenia.
(ix) Developmental delay. The child has been assessed by
appropriate diagnostic instruments and procedures and is experiencing
delays in one or more of the following areas: Physical development or
motor skills, cognitive development, communication, language, or speech
development, social or emotional development, or adaptive development.
(x) Developmental disability. The child has, or had previously been
diagnosed with a developmental disability as defined in the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000
(Pub. L. 106-402), section 102(8). This means a severe, chronic
disability of an individual that is attributable to a mental or
physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments
that manifests before the age of 22, is likely to continue indefinitely
and results in substantial functional limitations in three or more
areas of major life activity. Areas of major life activity include:
Self-care, receptive and expressive language, learning, mobility, self-
direction, capacity for independent living, economic self-sufficiency,
and reflects the individual's need for a combination and sequence of
special, interdisciplinary, or generic services, individualized
supports or other forms of assistance that are of lifelong or extended
duration and are individually planned and coordinated. If a child is
given the diagnosis of ``developmental disability,'' do not indicate
the individual conditions that form the basis of this diagnosis
separately in other data elements.
(xi) Other diagnosed condition. The child has, or had previously, a
diagnosed condition or other health impairment other than those
described in paragraphs (b)(10)(i) through (x) of this section, which
requires special medical care, such as asthma, diabetes, chronic
illnesses, a diagnosis as HIV positive or AIDS, epilepsy, traumatic
brain injury, other neurological disorders, speech/language impairment,
learning disability, or substance use issues.
(11) School enrollment. Indicate whether the child is a full-time
student at and enrolled in (or in the process of enrolling in)
``elementary'' or ``secondary'' education, or is a full or part-time
student at and enrolled in ``post-secondary education or training'' or
``college,'' as of the earlier of the last day of the report period or
the day of exit for a child exiting out-of-home care prior to the end
of the report period. A child is still considered enrolled in school if
the child would otherwise be enrolled in a school that is currently out
of session. An ``elementary or secondary school student'' is defined in
section 471(a)(30) of the Act as a child that is: Enrolled (or in the
process of enrolling) in an institution which provides elementary or
secondary education, as determined under the law of the state or other
jurisdiction in which the institution is located, instructed in
elementary or secondary education at home in accordance with a home
school law of the state or other jurisdiction in which the home is
located, in an independent study elementary or secondary education
program in accordance with the law of the state or other jurisdiction
in which the program is located, which is administered by the local
school or school district, or incapable of attending school on a full-
time basis due to the medical condition of the child, which
incapability is
[[Page 16593]]
supported by a regularly updated information in the case plan of the
child. Enrollment in ``post-secondary education or training'' refers to
full or part-time enrollment in any post-secondary education or
training, other than an education pursued at a college or university.
Enrollment in ``college'' refers to a child that is enrolled full or
part-time at a college or university. If child has not reached
compulsory school age, indicate ``not school-age.'' If the child has
reached compulsory school-age, but is not enrolled or is in the process
of enrolling in any school setting full-time, indicate ``not
enrolled.''
(12) Educational level. Indicate the highest educational level from
kindergarten to college or post-secondary education/training completed
by the child as of the last day of the report period. If child has not
reached compulsory school-age, indicate ``not school-age.'' Indicate
``kindergarten'' if the child is currently in or about to begin 1st
grade. Indicate ``1st grade'' if the child is currently in or about to
begin 2nd grade. Indicate ``2nd grade'' if the child is currently in or
about to begin 3rd grade. Indicate ``3rd grade'' if the child is
currently in or about to begin 4th grade. Indicate ``4th grade'' if the
child is currently in or about to begin 5th grade. Indicate ``5th
grade'' if the child is currently in or about to begin 6th grade.
Indicate ``6th grade'' if the child is currently in or about to begin
7th grade. Indicate ``7th grade'' if the child is currently in or about
to begin 8th grade. Indicate ``8th grade'' if the child is currently in
or about to begin 9th grade. Indicate ``9th grade'' if the child is
currently in or about to begin 10th grade. Indicate ``10th grade'' if
the child is currently in or about to begin 11th grade. Indicate ``11th
grade'' if the child is currently in or about to begin 12th grade.
Indicate ``12th grade'' if the child has graduated from high school.
Indicate ``GED'' if the child has completed a general equivalency
degree or other high school equivalent. Indicate ``Post-secondary
education or training'' if the child has completed any post-secondary
education or training, including vocational training, other than an
education pursued at a college or university. Indicate ``College'' if
the child has completed at least a semester of study at a college or
university.
(13) Pregnant or parenting. (i) Indicate whether the child is
pregnant as of the end of the report period. Indicate ``yes'' or
``no.''
(ii) Indicate whether the child has ever fathered or bore a child.
Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(iii) Indicate whether the child and his/her child(ren) are placed
together at any point during the report period, if the response in
paragraph (b)(13)(ii) of this section is ``yes.'' Indicate ``yes,''
``no,'' or ``not applicable'' if the response in paragraph (b)(13)(ii)
of this section is ``no.''
(14) Special education. Indicate whether the child has an
Individualized Education Program (IEP) as defined in section 614(d)(1)
of Part B of Title I of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA) and implementing regulations, or an Individualized Family
Service Program (IFSP) as defined in section 636 of Part C of Title I
of IDEA and implementing regulations, as of the end of the report
period. Indicate ``yes'' if the child has either an IEP or an IFSP or
``no'' if the child has neither.
(15) Prior adoption. Indicate whether the child experienced a prior
legal adoption before the current out-of-home care episode. Include any
public, private or independent adoption in the United States or
adoption in another country and tribal customary adoptions. Indicate
``yes,'' ``no'' or ``abandoned'' if the information is unknown because
the child has been abandoned. Abandoned means that the child was left
alone or with others and the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a child
left at a ``safe haven.'' If the child has experienced a prior legal
adoption, the title IV-E agency must complete paragraphs (b)(15)(i) and
(ii) of this section; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave those
paragraphs blank.
(i) Prior adoption date. Indicate the month and year that the most
recent prior adoption was finalized. In the case of a prior
intercountry adoption where the adoptive parent(s) readopted the child
in the United States, the title IV-E agency must provide the date of
the adoption (either the original adoption in the home country or the
re-adoption in the United States) that is considered final in
accordance with applicable laws.
(ii) Prior adoption intercountry. Indicate whether the child's most
recent prior adoption was an intercountry adoption, meaning that the
child's prior adoption occurred in another country or the child was
brought into the United States for the purposes of finalizing the prior
adoption. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(16)(i) Prior guardianship. Indicate whether the child experienced
a prior legal guardianship before the current out-of-home care episode.
Include any public, private or independent guardianship(s) in the
United States that meets the definition in section 475(d) of the Act.
This includes any judicially created relationship between a child and
caretaker which is intended to be permanent and self-sustaining as
evidenced by the transfer to the caretaker of the following parental
rights with respect to the child: Protection, education, care and
control, custody, and decision making. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or
``abandoned'' if the information is unknown because the child has been
abandoned. Abandoned means that the child was left alone or with others
and the identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and
cannot be ascertained. This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.''
If the child has experienced a prior legal guardianship, the title IV-E
agency must complete paragraph (b)(16)(ii) of this section; otherwise
the title IV-E agency must leave it blank.
(ii) Prior guardianship date. Indicate the month and year that the
most recent prior guardianship became legalized.
(17) Child financial and medical assistance. Indicate whether the
child received financial and medical assistance at any point during the
six-month report period. Indicate ``child has received support/
assistance'' if the child was the recipient of such assistance during
the report period, and indicate which of the following sources of
support described in paragraphs (b)(17)(i) through (viii) of this
section ``applies'' or ``does not apply.'' Indicate ``no support/
assistance received'' if none of these apply.
(i) State/Tribal adoption assistance. The child is receiving an
adoption subsidy or other adoption assistance paid for solely by the
state or Indian tribe.
(ii) State/Tribal foster care. The child is receiving a foster care
payment that is solely funded by the state or Indian tribe.
(iii) Title IV-E adoption subsidy. The child is determined eligible
for a title IV-E adoption assistance subsidy.
(iv) Title IV-E guardianship assistance. The child is determined
eligible for a title IV-E guardianship assistance subsidy.
(v) Title IV-A TANF. The child is living with relatives who are
receiving a Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash
assistance payment on behalf of the child.
(vi) Title IV-B. The child's living arrangement is supported by
funds under title IV-B of the Act.
(vii) Chafee Foster Care Independence Program. The child is living
independently and is supported by funds under the John F. Chafee Foster
Care Independence Program.
[[Page 16594]]
(viii) Other. The child is receiving financial support from another
source not previously listed in paragraphs (b)(17)(i) through (vii) of
this section.
(18) Title IV-E foster care during report period. Indicate whether
a title IV-E foster care maintenance payment was paid on behalf of the
child at any point during the report period that is claimed under title
IV-E foster care with a ``yes'' or ``no,'' as appropriate. Indicate
``yes'' if the child has met all eligibility requirements of section
472(a) of the Act and the title IV-E agency has claimed, or intends to
claim, federal reimbursement for foster care maintenance payments made
on the child's behalf during the report period.
(19) Total number of siblings. Indicate the total number of
siblings of the child. A sibling to the child is his or her brother or
sister by biological, legal, or marital connection. Do not include the
child who is subject of this record in the total number. If the child
does not have any siblings, the title IV-E agency must indicate ``0.''
If the title IV-E agency indicates ``0,'' the title IV-E agency must
leave paragraphs (b)(20) and (21) of this section blank.
(20) Siblings in foster care. Indicate the number of siblings of
the child who are in foster care as defined in Sec. 1355.20. A sibling
to the child is his or her brother or sister by biological, legal, or
marital connection. Do not include the child who is subject of this
record in the total number. If the child does not have any siblings,
the title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank. If the child has
siblings, but they are not in foster care as defined in Sec. 1355.20,
the title IV-E agency must indicate ``0.'' If the title IV-E agency
reported ``0,'' leave paragraph (b)(21) of this section blank.
(21) Siblings in living arrangement. Indicate the number of
siblings of the child who are in the same living arrangement as the
child, on the last day of the report period. A sibling to the child is
his or her brother or sister by biological, legal, or marital
connection. Do not include the child who is subject of this record in
the total number. If the child does not have any siblings, the title
IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank. If the child has siblings,
but they are not in the same living arrangement as the child, the title
IV-E agency must indicate ``0.''
(c) Parent or legal guardian information--(1) Year of birth of
first parent or legal guardian. If applicable, indicate the year of
birth of the first parent (biological, legal or adoptive) or legal
guardian of the child. To the extent that a child has both a parent and
a legal guardian, or two different sets of legal parents, the title IV-
E agency must report on those who had legal responsibility for the
child. We are not seeking information on putative parent(s) in this
paragraph. If there is only one parent or legal guardian of the child,
that person's year of birth must be reported here. If the child was
abandoned indicate ``abandoned.'' Abandoned means that the child was
left alone or with others and the identity of the child's parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a
child left at a ``safe haven.''
(2) Year of birth of second parent or legal guardian. If
applicable, indicate the year of birth of the second parent
(biological, legal or adoptive) or legal guardian of the child. We are
not seeking information on putative parent(s) in this paragraph. If the
child was abandoned, indicate ``abandoned.'' Abandoned means that the
child was left alone or with others and the identity of the child's
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be ascertained.
This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.'' Indicate ``not
applicable'' if there is not another parent or legal guardian.
(3) Tribal membership mother. For state title IV-E agencies only:
Indicate whether the biological or adoptive mother is a member of an
Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(4) Tribal membership father. For state title IV-E agencies only:
Indicate whether the biological or adoptive father is a member of an
Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(5) Termination/modification of parental rights. Indicate whether
the termination/modification of parental rights for each parent
(biological, legal and/or putative) was voluntary or involuntary.
Voluntary means the parent voluntary relinquished their parental rights
to the title IV-E agency, with or without court involvement. Indicate
``voluntary'' or ``involuntary.'' Indicate ``not applicable'' if there
was no termination/modification and leave paragraphs (c)(5)(i) and (ii)
of this section blank.
(i) Termination/modification of parental rights petition. Indicate
the month, day and year that each petition to terminate/modify the
parental rights of a biological, legal and/or putative parent was filed
in court, if applicable. Indicate ``deceased'' if the parent is
deceased.
(ii) Termination/modification of parental rights. Enter the month,
day and year that the parental rights were voluntarily or involuntarily
terminated/modified, for each biological, legal and/or putative parent,
if applicable. If the parent is deceased, enter the date of death.
(d) Removal information--(1) Date of child's removal. Indicate the
removal date(s) in month, day and year format for each removal of a
child who enters the placement and care responsibility of the title IV-
E agency. For a child who is removed and is placed initially in foster
care, indicate the date that the title IV-E agency received placement
and care responsibility. For a child who ran away or whose whereabouts
are unknown at the time the child is removed and is placed in the
placement and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency, indicate
the date that the title IV-E agency received placement and care
responsibility. For a child who is removed and is placed initially in a
non-foster care setting, indicate the date that the child enters foster
care as the date of removal.
(2) Removal transaction date. A non-modifiable, computer-generated
date which accurately indicates the month, day and year each response
to paragraph (d)(1) of this section was entered into the information
system.
(3) Environment at removal. Indicate the type of environment
(household or facility) the child was living in at the time of each
removal for each removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
Indicate ``parent household'' if the child was living in a household
that included one or both of the child's parents, whether biological,
adoptive or legal. Indicate ``relative household'' if the child was
living with a relative(s), the relative(s) is not the child's legal
guardian and neither of the child's parents were living in the
household. Indicate ``legal guardian household'' if the child was
living with a legal guardian(s), the guardian(s) is not the child's
relative and neither of the child's parents were living in the
household. Indicate ``relative legal guardian household'' if the child
was living with a relative(s) who is also the child's legal guardian.
Indicate ``justice facility'' if the child was in a detention center,
jail or other similar setting where the child was detained. Indicate
``medical/mental health facility'' if the child was living in a
facility such as a medical or psychiatric hospital or residential
treatment center. Indicate ``other'' if the child was living in another
situation not so described, such as living independently or homeless.
(4) Child and family circumstances at removal. Indicate all child
and family circumstances that were present at the time of the child's
removal and/or related to the child being placed into foster care for
each removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. Indicate
[[Page 16595]]
whether each circumstance described in paragraphs (d)(4)(i) through
(xxxiv) of this section ``applies'' or ``does not apply'' for each
removal indicated in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(i) Runaway. The child has left, without authorization, the home or
facility where the child was residing.
(ii) Whereabouts unknown. The child's whereabouts are unknown and
the title IV-E agency does not consider the child to have run away.
(iii) Physical abuse. Alleged or substantiated physical abuse,
injury or maltreatment of the child by a person responsible for the
child's welfare.
(iv) Sexual abuse. Alleged or substantiated sexual abuse or
exploitation of the child by a person who is responsible for the
child's welfare.
(v) Psychological or emotional abuse. Alleged or substantiated
psychological or emotional abuse, including verbal abuse, of the child
by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare.
(vi) Neglect. Alleged or substantiated negligent treatment or
maltreatment of the child, including failure to provide adequate food,
clothing, shelter, supervision or care by a person who is responsible
for the child's welfare.
(vii) Medical neglect. Alleged or substantiated medical neglect
caused by a failure to provide for the appropriate health care of the
child by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare, although
the person was financially able to do so, or was offered financial or
other means to do so.
(viii) Domestic violence. Alleged or substantiated violent act(s),
including any forceful detention of an individual that results in,
threatens to result in, or attempts to cause physical injury or mental
harm. This is committed by a person against another individual residing
in the child's home and with whom such person is in an intimate
relationship, dating relationship, is or was related by marriage, or
has a child in common. This circumstance includes domestic violence
between the child and his or her partner and applies to a child or
youth of any age (including those younger and older than the age of
majority. This does not include alleged or substantiated maltreatment
of the child by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare.
(ix) Abandonment. The child was left alone or with others and the
parent or legal guardian's identity is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This does not include a child left at a ``safe haven'' as
defined by the title IV-E agency. This category does not apply when the
identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is known.
(x) Failure to return. The parent, legal guardian or caretaker did
not or has not returned for the child or made his or her whereabouts
known. This category does not apply when the identity of the parent,
legal guardian or caretaker is unknown.
(xi) Caretaker's alcohol use. A parent, legal guardian or other
caretaker responsible for the child uses alcohol compulsively that is
not of a temporary nature.
(xii) Caretaker's drug use. A parent, legal guardian or other
caretaker responsible for the child uses drugs compulsively that is not
of a temporary nature.
(xiii) Child alcohol use. The child uses alcohol.
(xiv) Child drug use. The child uses drugs.
(xv) Prenatal alcohol exposure. The child has been identified as
prenatally exposed to alcohol, resulting in fetal alcohol spectrum
disorders such as fetal alcohol exposure, fetal alcohol effect or fetal
alcohol syndrome.
(xvi) Prenatal drug exposure. The child has been identified as
prenatally exposed to drugs.
(xvii) Diagnosed condition. The child has a clinical diagnosis by a
qualified professional of a health, behavioral or mental health
condition, such as one or more of the following: Intellectual
disability, emotional disturbance, specific learning disability,
hearing, speech or sight impairment, physical disability or other
clinically diagnosed condition.
(xviii) Inadequate access to mental health services. The child and/
or child's family has inadequate resources to access the necessary
mental health services outside of the child's out-of-home care
placement.
(xix) Inadequate access to medical services. The child and/or
child's family has inadequate resources to access the necessary medical
services outside of the child's out-of-home care placement.
(xx) Child behavior problem. The child's behavior in his or her
school and/or community adversely affects his or her socialization,
learning, growth and/or moral development. This includes all child
behavior problems, as well as adjudicated and non-adjudicated status or
delinquency offenses and convictions.
(xxi) Death of caretaker. Existing family stress in caring for the
child or an inability to care for the child due to the death of a
parent, legal guardian or other caretaker.
(xxii) Incarceration of caretaker. The child's parent, legal
guardian or caretaker is temporarily or permanently placed in jail or
prison which adversely affects his or her ability to care for the
child.
(xxiii) Caretaker's significant impairment--physical/emotional. A
physical or emotional illness or disabling condition of the child's
parent, legal guardian or caretaker that adversely limits his or her
ability to care for the child.
(xxiv) Caretaker's significant impairment--cognitive. The child's
parent, legal guardian or caretaker has cognitive limitations that
impact his or her ability to function in areas of daily life, which
adversely affect his or her ability to care for the child. It also may
be characterized by a significantly below-average score on a test of
mental ability or intelligence.
(xxv) Inadequate housing. The child's or his or her family's
housing is substandard, overcrowded, unsafe or otherwise inadequate
which results in it being inappropriate for the child to reside.
(xxvi) Voluntary relinquishment for adoption. The child's parent
has voluntarily relinquished the child by assigning the physical and
legal custody of the child to the title IV-E agency, in writing, for
the purpose of having the child adopted. This includes a child left at
a ``safe haven'' as defined by the title IV-E agency.
(xxvii) Child requested placement. The child, age 18 or older, has
requested placement into foster care.
(xxviii) Sex trafficking. The child is a victim of sex trafficking
at the time of removal.
(xxix) Parental immigration detainment or deportation. The parent
is or was detained or deported by immigration officials.
(xxx) Family conflict related to child's sexual orientation, gender
identity, or gender expression. There is family conflict related to the
child's expressed or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, or
gender expression. This includes any conflict related to the ways in
which a child manifests masculinity or femininity.
(xxxi) Educational neglect. Alleged or substantiated failure of a
parent or caregiver to enroll a child of mandatory school age in school
or provide appropriate home schooling or needed special educational
training, thus allowing the child or youth to engage in chronic
truancy.
(xxxii) Public agency title IV-E agreement. The child is in the
placement and care responsibility of another public agency that has an
agreement with the title IV-E agency pursuant to section 472(a)(2)(B)
of the Act and on whose behalf title IV-E
[[Page 16596]]
foster care maintenance payments are made.
(xxxiii) Tribal title IV-E agreement. The child is in the placement
and care responsibility of an Indian tribe, tribal organization or
consortium with which the title IV-E agency has an agreement and on
whose behalf title IV-E foster care maintenance payments are made.
(xxxiv) Homelessness. The child or his or her family has no regular
or adequate place to live. This includes living in a car, or on the
street, or staying in a homeless or other temporary shelter.
(5) Victim of sex trafficking prior to entering foster care.
Indicate whether the child had been a victim of sex trafficking before
the current out-of-home care episode. Indicate ``yes'' if the child was
a victim or ``no'' if the child had not been a victim.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' in paragraph (d)(5) introductory text of this section, indicate
whether the title IV-E agency made a report to law enforcement for
entry into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database.
Indicate ``yes'' if the agency made a report to law enforcement and
indicate ``no'' if the agency did not make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph
(d)(5)(i) of this section, indicate the date that the agency made the
report to law enforcement.
(6) Victim of sex trafficking while in foster care. Indicate
``yes'' if the child was a victim of sex trafficking while in out-of-
home care during the current out-of-home care episode. Indicate ``no''
if the child was not a victim of sex trafficking during the current
out-of-home care episode.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' in this paragraph (d)(6) of this section, indicate whether the
agency made a report to law enforcement for entry into the NCIC
database. Indicate ``yes'' if the title IV-E agency made a report(s) to
law enforcement and indicate ``no'' if the title IV-E agency did not
make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph
(d)(6)(i) of this section, indicate the date(s) the agency made the
report(s) to law enforcement.
(e) Living arrangement and provider information--(1) Date of living
arrangement. Indicate the month, day and year representing the first
date of placement in each of the child's living arrangements for each
out-of-home care episode. In the case of a child who has run away,
whose whereabouts are unknown, or who is already in a living
arrangement and remains there when the title IV-E agency receives
placement and care responsibility, indicate the date of the VPA or
court order providing the title IV-E agency with placement and care
responsibility for the child, rather than the date when the child was
originally placed in the living arrangement.
(2) Foster family home. Indicate whether each of the child's living
arrangements is a foster family home, with a ``yes'' or ``no'' as
appropriate. If the child has run away or the child's whereabouts are
unknown, indicate ``no.'' If the title IV-E agency indicates that the
child is living in a foster family home, by indicating ``yes,'' the
title IV-E agency must complete paragraph (e)(3) of this section. If
the title IV-E agency indicates ``no,'' the title IV-E agency must
complete paragraph (e)(4) of this section.
(3) Foster family home type. If the title IV-E agency indicated
that the child is living in a foster family home in paragraph (e)(2) of
this section, indicate whether each foster family home type listed in
paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through (vi) of this section applies or does not
apply; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph (e)(3)
blank.
(i) Licensed home. The child's living arrangement is licensed or
approved by the state or tribal licensing/approval authority.
(ii) Therapeutic foster family home. The home provides specialized
care and services.
(iii) Shelter care foster family home. The home is so designated by
the state or tribal licensing/approval authority, and is designed to
provide short-term or transitional care.
(iv) Relative foster family home. The foster parent(s) is related
to the child by biological, legal or marital connection and the
relative foster parent(s) lives in the home as his or her primary
residence.
(v) Pre-adoptive home. The home is one in which the family and the
title IV-E agency have agreed on a plan to adopt the child.
(vi) Kin foster family home. The home is one in which there is a
kin relationship as defined by the title IV-E agency, such as one where
there is a psychological, cultural or emotional relationship between
the child or the child's family and the foster parent(s) and there is
not a legal, biological, or marital connection between the child and
foster parent.
(4) Other living arrangement type. If the title IV-E agency
indicated that the child's living arrangement is other than a foster
family home in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, indicate the type of
setting; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph
blank. Indicate ``group home-family operated'' if the child is in a
group home that provides 24-hour care in a private family home where
the family members are the primary caregivers. Indicate ``group home-
staff operated'' if the child is in a group home that provides 24-hour
care for children where the care-giving is provided by shift or
rotating staff. Indicate ``group home-shelter care'' if the child is in
a group home that provides 24-hour care which is short-term or
transitional in nature, and is designated by the state or tribal
licensing/approval authority to provide shelter care. Indicate
``residential treatment center'' if the child is in a facility that has
the purpose of treating children with mental health or behavioral
conditions or if the child is placed with a parent who is in a licensed
residential family-based treatment facility for substance abuse per
section 472(j) of the Act. This does not include a qualified
residential treatment program defined in section 472(k)(4) of the Act.
Indicate ``qualified residential treatment program'' if the child is in
a placement that meets all of the requirements of section 472(k)(2)(A)
and (4) of the Act. Indicate ``child care institution'' if the child is
in a private child care institution, or a public child care institution
which accommodates no more than 25 children, and is licensed by the
state or tribal authority responsible for licensing or approving child
care institutions. This includes a setting specializing in providing
prenatal, post-partum, or parenting supports for youth per section
472(k)(2)(B) of the Act, and a setting providing high-quality
residential care and supportive services to children and youth who have
been found to be, or are at risk of becoming, sex trafficking victims
per section 472(k)(2)(D) of the Act. This does not include detention
facilities, forestry camps, training schools or any other facility
operated primarily for the detention of children who are determined to
be delinquent. Indicate ``child care institution-shelter care'' if the
child is in a child care institution and the institution is designated
to provide shelter care by the state or tribal authority responsible
for licensing or approving child care institutions and is short-term or
transitional in nature. Indicate ``supervised independent living'' if
the child is living independently in a supervised setting. Indicate
``juvenile justice facility'' if the child is in a secure facility or
institution where alleged or adjudicated juvenile delinquents are
[[Page 16597]]
housed. Indicate ``medical or rehabilitative facility'' if the child is
in a facility where an individual receives medical or physical health
care, such as a hospital. Indicate ``psychiatric hospital'' if the
child is in a facility that provides emotional or psychological health
care and is licensed or accredited as a hospital. Indicate ``runaway''
if the child has left, without authorization, the home or facility
where the child was placed. Indicate ``whereabouts unknown'' if the
child is not in the physical custody of the title IV-E agency or person
or institution with whom the child has been placed, the child's
whereabouts are unknown and the title IV-E agency does not consider the
child to have run away. Indicate ``placed at home'' if the child is
home with the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) in preparation for the
title IV-E agency to return the child home permanently.
(5) Location of living arrangement. Indicate whether each of the
child's living arrangements reported in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section is located within or outside of the reporting state or tribal
service area or is outside of the country. Indicate ``out-of-state or
out-of-tribal service area'' if the child's living arrangement is
located outside of the reporting state or tribal service area but
inside the United States. Indicate ``in-state or in-tribal service
area'' if the child's living arrangement is located within the
reporting state or tribal service area. Indicate ``out-of-country'' if
the child's living arrangement is outside of the United States.
Indicate ``runaway or whereabouts unknown'' if the child has run away
from his or her living arrangement or the child's whereabouts are
unknown. If the title IV-E agency indicates either ``out-of-state or
out-of-tribal service area'' or ``out-of-country'' for the child's
living arrangement, the title IV-E agency must complete paragraph
(e)(6) of this section; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave
paragraph (e)(6) of this section blank.
(6) Jurisdiction or country where child is living. Indicate the
state, tribal service area, Indian reservation, or country where the
reporting title IV-E agency placed the child for each living
arrangement, if the title IV-E agency indicated either ``out-of-state''
or ``out-of-tribal service area'' or ``out-of-country'' in paragraph
(e)(5) of this section; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave
paragraph (e)(6) of this section blank. The title IV-E agency must
report the information in a format according to ACF's specifications.
(7) Marital status of the foster parent(s). Indicate the marital
status of the child's foster parent(s) for each foster family home
living arrangement in which the child is placed, as indicated in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section. Indicate ``married couple'' if the
foster parents are considered united in matrimony according to
applicable laws. Include common law marriage, where provided by
applicable laws. Indicate ``unmarried couple'' if the foster parents
are living together as a couple, but are not united in matrimony
according to applicable laws. Indicate ``separated'' if the foster
parent is legally separated or is living apart from his or her spouse.
Indicate ``single adult'' if the foster parent is not married and is
not living with another individual as part of a couple. If the response
is either ``married couple'' or ``unmarried couple,'' the title IV-E
agency must complete the paragraphs for the second foster parent in
paragraphs (e)(14) through (18) of this section; otherwise the title
IV-E agency must leave those paragraphs blank.
(8) Child's relationships to the foster parent(s). Indicate the
type of relationship between the child and his or her foster parent(s),
for each foster family home living arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. Indicate
``relative(s)'' if the foster parent(s) is the child's relative (by
biological, legal or marital connection). Indicate ``non-relative(s)''
if the foster parent(s) is not related to the child (by biological,
legal or marital connection). Indicate ``kin'' if the foster parent(s)
has kin relationship to the child as defined by the title IV-E agency,
such as one where there is a psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the child's family and the foster
parent(s) and there is not a legal, biological, or marital connection
between the child and foster parent.
(9) Year of birth for first foster parent. Indicate the year of
birth for the first foster parent for each foster family home living
arrangement in which the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph
(e)(3) of this section.
(10) First foster parent tribal membership. For state title IV-E
agencies only: Indicate whether the first foster parent is a member of
an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(11) Race of first foster parent. Indicate the race of the first
foster parent for each foster family home living arrangement in which
the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
In general, an individual's race is determined by the individual.
Indicate whether each race category listed in paragraphs (e)(11)(i)
through (vii) of this section applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.''
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America) and maintains tribal
affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--unknown. The foster parent does not know his or her
race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race--declined. The first foster parent has declined to
identify a race.
(12) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first foster parent. Indicate
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the first foster parent for each
foster family home living arrangement in which the child is placed, as
indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. In general, an
individual's ethnicity is determined by the individual. An individual
is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the individual is a person of
Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American or other
Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether this
category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the first foster parent
does not know his or her ethnicity indicate ``unknown.'' If the
individual refuses to identify his or her ethnicity, indicate
``declined.''
(13) Sex of first foster parent. Indicate whether the first foster
parent is ``female'' or ``male.''
(14) Year of birth for second foster parent. Indicate the birth
year of the second foster parent for each foster family home living
arrangement in which the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph
(e)(3) of this section, if applicable. The title IV-E agency must leave
this paragraph blank if there is no second foster parent according to
paragraph (e)(7) of this section.
[[Page 16598]]
(15) Second foster parent tribal membership. For state title IV-E
agencies only: Indicate whether the second foster parent is a member of
an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(16) Race of second foster parent. Indicate the race of the second
foster parent for each foster family home living arrangement in which
the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section,
if applicable. In general, an individual's race is determined by the
individual. Indicate whether each race category listed in paragraphs
(e)(16)(i) through (vii) of this section applies with a ``yes'' or
``no.'' The title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank if there
is no second foster parent according to paragraph (e)(7) of this
section.
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America) and maintains tribal
affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--unknown. The second foster parent does not know his or
her race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race--declined. The second foster parent has declined to
identify a race.
(17) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of second foster parent. Indicate
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the second foster parent for each
foster family home living arrangement in which the child is placed, as
indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, if applicable. In
general, an individual's ethnicity is determined by the individual. An
individual is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the individual is a
person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American or
other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether
this category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the second foster
parent does not know his or her ethnicity, indicate ``unknown.'' If the
individual refuses to identify his or her ethnicity, indicate
``declined.'' The title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank if
there is no second foster parent according to paragraph (e)(7) of this
section.
(18) Sex of second foster parent. Indicate whether the second
foster parent is ``female'' or ``male.''
(f) Permanency planning--(1) Permanency plan. Indicate each
permanency plan established for the child. Indicate ``reunify with
parent(s) or legal guardian(s)'' if the plan is to keep the child in
out-of-home care for a limited time and the title IV-E agency is to
work with the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) to establish a
stable family environment. Indicate ``live with other relatives'' if
the plan is for the child to live permanently with a relative(s) (by
biological, legal or marital connection) who is not the child's
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate ``adoption'' if the plan is to
facilitate the child's adoption by relatives, foster parents, kin or
other unrelated individuals. Indicate ``guardianship'' if the plan is
to establish a new legal guardianship. Indicate ``planned permanent
living arrangement'' if the plan is for the child to remain in foster
care until the title IV-E agency's placement and care responsibility
ends. The title IV-E agency must only select ``planned permanent living
arrangement'' consistent with the requirements in section 475(5)(C)(i)
of the Act. Indicate ``permanency plan not established'' if a
permanency plan has not yet been established.
(2) Date of permanency plan. Indicate the month, day and year that
each permanency plan(s) was established during each out-of-home care
episode.
(3) Date of periodic review. Enter the month, day and year of each
periodic review, either by a court or by administrative review (as
defined in section 475(6) of the Act) that meets the requirements of
section 475(5)(B) of the Act.
(4) Date of permanency hearing. Enter the month, day and year of
each permanency hearing held by a court or an administrative body
appointed or approved by the court that meets the requirements of
section 475(5)(C) of the Act.
(5) Caseworker visit dates. Enter each date in which a caseworker
had an in-person, face-to-face visit with the child consistent with
section 422(b)(17) of the Act. Indicate the month, day and year of each
visit.
(6) Caseworker visit location. Indicate the location of each in-
person, face-to-face visit between the caseworker and the child.
Indicate ``child's residence'' if the visit occurred at the location
where the child is currently residing, such as the current foster care
provider's home, child care institution or facility. Indicate ``other
location'' if the visit occurred at any location other than where the
child currently resides, such as the child's school, a court, a child
welfare office or in the larger community.
(g) General exit information. Provide exit information for each
out-of-home care episode. An exit occurs when the title IV-E agency's
placement and care responsibility of the child ends.
(1) Date of exit. Indicate the month, day and year for each of the
child's exits from out-of-home care. An exit occurs when the title IV-E
agency's placement and care responsibility of the child ends. If the
child has not exited out-of-home care the title IV-E agency must leave
this paragraph blank. If this paragraph is applicable, paragraphs
(g)(2) and (3) of this section must have a response.
(2) Exit transaction date. A non-modifiable, computer-generated
date which accurately indicates the month, day and year each response
to paragraph (g)(1) of this section was entered into the information
system.
(3) Exit reason. Indicate the reason for each of the child's exits
from out-of-home care. Indicate ``not applicable'' if the child has not
exited out-of-home care. Indicate ``reunify with parent(s)/legal
guardian(s)'' if the child was returned to his or her parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) and the title IV-E agency no longer has placement and
care responsibility. Indicate ``live with other relatives'' if the
child exited to live with a relative (related by a biological, legal or
marital connection) other than his or her parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). Indicate ``adoption'' if the child was legally adopted.
Indicate ``emancipation'' if the child exited care due to age. Indicate
``guardianship'' if the child exited due to a legal guardianship of the
child. Indicate ``runaway or whereabouts unknown'' if the child ran
away or the child's whereabouts were unknown at the time that the title
IV-E agency's placement and care responsibility ends. Indicate ``death
of child'' if the child died while in out-of-home care. Indicate
``transfer to another agency'' if placement and care responsibility for
the child was transferred to another agency, either within or outside
of the reporting state or tribal service area.
[[Page 16599]]
(4) Transfer to another agency. If the title IV-E agency indicated
the child was transferred to another agency in paragraph (g)(3) of this
section, indicate the type of agency that received placement and care
responsibility for the child from the following options: ``State title
IV-E agency,'' ``Tribal title IV-E agency,'' ``Indian tribe or tribal
agency (non-IV-E),'' ``juvenile justice agency,'' ``mental health
agency,'' ``other public agency'' or ``private agency.''
(h) Exit to adoption and guardianship information. Report
information in paragraph (h) only if the title IV-E agency indicated
the child exited to adoption or legal guardianship in paragraph (g)(3)
of this section. Otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave paragraphs
(h)(1) through (15) of this section blank.
(1) Marital status of the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s).
Indicate the marital status of the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). Indicate ``married couple'' if the adoptive parents or
legal guardians are considered united in matrimony according to
applicable laws. Include common law marriage, where provided by
applicable laws. Indicate ``married but individually adopting or
obtaining legal guardianship'' if the adoptive parents or legal
guardians are considered united in matrimony according to applicable
laws, but are individually adopting or obtaining legal guardianship.
Indicate ``separated'' if the foster parent is legally separated or is
living apart from his or her spouse. Indicate ``unmarried couple'' if
the adoptive parents or guardians are living together as a couple, but
are not united in matrimony according to applicable laws. Use this
response option even if only one person of the unmarried couple is the
adoptive parent or legal guardian of the child. Indicate ``single
adult'' if the adoptive parent or legal guardian is not married and is
not living with another individual as part of a couple. If the response
is ``married couple'' or ``unmarried couple,'' the title IV-E agency
also must complete paragraphs for the second adoptive parent or second
legal guardian in paragraphs (h)(8) through (12) of this section;
otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave those paragraphs blank.
(2) Child's relationship to the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s).
Indicate the type of relationship between the child and his or her
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate whether each
relationship listed in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (iv) of this
section ``applies'' or ``does not apply.''
(i) Relative(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is the
child's relative (by biological, legal or marital connection).
(ii) Kin. The adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) has a kin
relationship with the child, as defined by the title IV-E agency, such
as one where there is a psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the child's family and the adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) and there is not a legal, biological, or
marital connection between the child and foster parent.
(iii) Non-relative(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
is not related to the child by biological, legal or marital connection.
(iv) Foster parent(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
was the child's foster parent(s).
(3) Date of birth of first adoptive parent or guardian. Indicate
the month, day and year of the birth of the first adoptive parent or
legal guardian.
(4) First adoptive parent or guardian tribal membership. For state
title IV-E agencies only: Indicate whether the first adoptive parent or
guardian is a member of an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no'' or
``unknown.''
(5) Race of first adoptive parent or guardian. In general, an
individual's race is determined by the individual. Indicate whether
each race category listed in paragraphs (h)(5)(i) through (vii) of this
section applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.''
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America), and maintains
tribal affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--Unknown. The first adoptive parent or legal guardian
does not know his or her race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race--Declined. The first adoptive parent, or legal guardian
has declined to identify a race.
(6) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first adoptive parent or
guardian. In general, an individual's ethnicity is determined by the
individual. An individual is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or
Central American or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of
race. Indicate whether this category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.''
If the first adoptive parent or legal guardian does not know his or her
ethnicity, indicate ``unknown.'' If the individual refuses to identify
his or her ethnicity, indicate ``declined.''
(7) Sex of first adoptive parent or guardian. Indicate whether the
first adoptive parent is ``female'' or ``male.''
(8) Date of birth of second adoptive parent, guardian, or other
member of the couple. Indicate the month, day and year of the date of
birth of the second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of
the couple. The title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank if
there is no second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of
the couple according to paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
(9) Second adoptive parent, guardian, or other member of the couple
tribal membership. For state title IV-E agencies only: Indicate whether
the second adoptive parent or guardian is a member of an Indian tribe.
Indicate ``yes,'' ``no'' or ``unknown.''
(10) Race of second adoptive parent, guardian, or other member of
the couple. In general, an individual's race is determined by the
individual. Indicate whether each race category listed in paragraphs
(h)(10)(i) through (vii) of this section applies with a ``yes'' or
``no.'' The title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank if there
is no second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of the
couple according to paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America), and maintains
tribal affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
[[Page 16600]]
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--Unknown. The second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or
other member of the couple does not know his or her race, or at least
one race.
(vii) Race--Declined. The second adoptive parent, legal guardian,
or other member of the couple has declined to identify a race.
(11) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the couple. In general, an individual's
ethnicity is determined by the individual. An individual is of Hispanic
or Latino ethnicity if the individual is a person of Cuban, Mexican,
Puerto Rican, South or Central American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether this category applies with
a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or
other member of the couple does not know his or her ethnicity, indicate
``unknown.'' If the individual refuses to identify his or her
ethnicity, indicate ``declined.'' The title IV-E agency must leave this
paragraph blank if there is no second adoptive parent, legal guardian,
or other member of the couple according to paragraph (h)(1) of this
section.
(12) Sex of second adoptive parent, guardian, or other member of
the couple. Indicate whether the second adoptive parent, guardian, or
other member of the couple is ``female'' or ``male.''
(13) Inter/Intrajurisdictional adoption or guardianship. Indicate
whether the child was placed within the state or tribal service area,
outside of the state or tribal service area or into another country for
adoption or legal guardianship. Indicate ``interjurisdictional adoption
or guardianship'' if the reporting title IV-E agency placed the child
for adoption or legal guardianship outside of the state or tribal
service area but within the United States. Indicate ``intercountry
adoption or guardianship'' if the reporting title IV-E agency placed
the child for adoption or legal guardianship outside of the United
States. Indicate ``intrajurisdictional adoption or guardianship'' if
the reporting title IV-E agency placed the child within the same state
or tribal service area as the one with placing responsibility.
(14) Assistance agreement type. Indicate the type of assistance
agreement between the title IV-E agency and the adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s): ``Title IV-E adoption assistance agreement'';
``State/tribal adoption assistance agreement''; ``Adoption-Title IV-E
agreement non-recurring expenses only''; ``Adoption-Title IV-E
agreement Medicaid only''; ``Title IV-E guardianship assistance
agreement''; ``State/tribal guardianship assistance agreement''; or
``no agreement'' if there is no assistance agreement.
(15) Siblings in adoptive or guardianship home. Indicate the number
of siblings of the child who are in the same adoptive or guardianship
home as the child. A sibling to the child is his or her brother or
sister by biological, legal, or marital connection. Do not include the
child who is subject of this record in the total number. If the child
does not have any siblings, the title IV-E agency must indicate ``not
applicable.'' If the child has siblings, but they are not in the same
adoptive or guardianship home as the child, the title IV-E agency must
indicate ``0.''
0
5. In Sec. 1355.45, revise paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3)(vi) and add
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 1355.45 Adoption and guardianship assistance data file elements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Child's sex. Indicate ``male'' or ``female.''
(3) * * *
(vi) Race--Unknown. The child or parent or legal guardian does not
know the race, or at least one race of the child is not known. This
category does not apply when the child has been abandoned or the
parents failed to return and the identity of the child, parent(s), or
legal guardian(s) is known.
* * * * *
(f) Adoption or guardianship placing agency. Indicate the agency
that placed the child for adoption or legal guardianship. Indicate
``title IV-E agency'' if the reporting title IV-E agency placed the
child for adoption or legal guardianship. Indicate ``private agency
under agreement'' if a private agency placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship through an agreement with the reporting title IV-E
agency. Indicate ``Indian tribe under contract/agreement'' if an Indian
tribe, tribal organization or consortia placed the child for adoption
or legal guardianship through a contract or an agreement with the
reporting title IV-E agency.
0
6. In Sec. 1355.46, revise the second sentence of paragraph (c)(2) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1355.46 Compliance.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * * In addition, each record subject to compliance standards
within the data file must have the data elements described in
Sec. Sec. 1355.44(a)(1) through (4), 1355.44(b)(1) and (2), and
1355.45(a) and (b)(1) and (2) be 100 percent free of missing data,
invalid data and internally inconsistent data (see paragraphs (b)(1)
through (3) of this section). * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-07827 Filed 4-16-19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4184-25-P