Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Ohio Less Than 10 TPY BAT Exemption, 14874-14877 [2019-07332]
Download as PDF
14874
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone around all waters within the
following coordinates in Laguna Madre:
Beginning at 027°42′05″ N, 097°14′09″
W, thence east to 027°42′54″ N,
097°17′12″ W, thence south to
027°41′36″ N, 097°14′19″ W thence
directly west to 027°42′26″ N,
097°17′22″ W, and thence north to its
origin. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0057 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0057 Safety Zone; Laguna
Madre, Corpus Christi, TX.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters
beginning at Point A (027°42′05″ N,
097°14′09″ W), running east to Point B
(027°42′54″ N, 097°17′12″ W), running
south to Point C (027°41′36″ N,
097°14′19″ W), running west to Point D
(027°42′26″ N, 097°17′22″ W), and back
North to Point A.
(b) Effective and enforcement periods.
This section is effective from April 11,
2019 through April 14, 2019. This
section will be enforced from 11 a.m.
through 5 p.m. each day of the effective
period.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations in § 165.33 apply. Entry into
this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Corpus Christi (COTP) or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels seeking to enter
the safety zone must request permission
from the COTP on VHF–FM channel 16
or by telephone at 361–939–0450.
(3) If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels shall comply with
the instructions of the COTP or
designated representative.
(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or a designated representative will
inform the public of the enforcement
times and date for this security zone
through Broadcast Notices to Mariners,
Local Notices to Mariners, and/or Safety
Marine Information Broadcasts as
appropriate.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2019–07271 Filed 4–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[FR Doc. 2019–07260 Filed 4–11–19; 8:45 am]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Ohio Less
Than 10 TPY BAT Exemption
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0369; FRL–9992–18–
Region 5]
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
38 CFR Part 1
SUMMARY:
RIN 2900–AQ27
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Release of Information From
Department of Veterans Affairs’
Records
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
■
On April 1, 2019, the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
published a rule to amend its
SUMMARY:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Jkt 247001
Dated: April 9, 2019.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulations Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of the Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
AGENCY:
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
16:08 Apr 11, 2019
Correction
In FR Rule Doc. No. 2019–06101,
appearing on page 12128 in the Federal
Register of April 1, 2019, make the
following correction:
■ 1. On page 12128, in the second
column, for § 1.561, correct instruction
number 11.b. to read as follows:
b. Adding paragraph (b)(10).
Dated: April 4, 2019.
E.J. Gaynor,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Corpus Christi.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
VerDate Sep<11>2014
regulations governing the submission
and processing of requests for
information under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) and the Privacy
Act to reorganize, streamline, and
clarify existing regulations. An error
occurred in one amendatory instruction.
This document corrects that error.
DATES: This correction is effective May
1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Nachmann, Attorney, Office
of General Counsel (024), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–
7742. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
1, 2019, VA published a rule in the
Federal Register (84 FR 12122) which
contained an error in instruction
number 11 under 38 CFR 1.561.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving, under the
Clean Air Act (CAA), revisions to Ohio’s
State Implementation Plan (SIP) as
requested by the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (OEPA) on May 22,
2018. The revisions to Ohio’s SIP
exempt sources that emit less than 10
tons per year (tpy) of each criteria
pollutant from the need to employ Best
Available Technology (BAT).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 13, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
I. Background
On August 3, 2006, the Ohio General
Assembly passed Senate Bill 265 (SB
265) which required OEPA to modify
several of its BAT rules. One of the
changes implemented was the less than
10 tpy BAT exemption. To implement
the SB 265 changes, OEPA adopted
revisions under OAC Chapter 3745–31–
05(A)(3)(b) on November 20, 2006, and
then moved the language in OAC rule
3745–31–05 from paragraph (A)(3)(b) to
(A)(3)(a)(ii) on June 30, 2008. The rule
language contained in OAC rule 3745–
31–05(A)(3)(a)(ii) was carried over in
OAC rule 3745–31–05, which was
adopted on April 20, 2016 and is what
EPA is now approving as a revision to
its SIP. On January 18, 2008, OEPA
requested that EPA approve this rule
language as a revision to Ohio’s SIP.
EPA responded with a June 5, 2008
letter to OEPA indicating that the
request was incomplete due to a lack of
a CAA section 110(l) demonstration,
thus returning the request back to
OEPA.
OEPA’s May 22, 2018 SIP revision
submittal included the analysis required
by section 110(l) of the CAA. This
demonstration included an extensive
quantitative and qualitative analysis to
show the impact that the less than 10
tpy BAT exemption would have on
emissions. OEPA’s 110(l) analysis
demonstrated that the air quality will
not be negatively impacted due to the
small increase in emissions as result of
the less than 10 tpy BAT exemption. On
November 14, 2018 (83 FR 56775), EPA
published a proposed approval of the
rule revision included in the May 22,
2018 submittal from OEPA. The specific
details of OEPA’s May 22, 2018 SIP
submittal and the rationale for EPA’s
approval were discussed in the
November 14, 2018 notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM).
On May 22, 2018, OEPA submitted a
SIP revision to Ohio Administrative
Code (OAC) rule 3745–31–
05(A)(3)(a)(ii). This revision exempts
the smaller emitting sources, those that
emit less than 10 tpy of each criteria
pollutant, from the need to employ
BAT. OEPA’s less than 10 tpy BAT
exemption is in OAC 3745–31–
05(A)(3)(a)(ii) and reads: ‘‘BAT is not
required if the air contaminant source
was installed or modified on or after
August 3, 2006 and has the potential to
emit (PTE), taking into account air
pollution controls installed on the
source, less than ten tons per year of
emissions of an air contaminant or
precursor of an air contaminant for
which a national ambient air quality
standard has been adopted under the
Clean Air Act.’’
II. What is EPA’s response to the
comments?
EPA received three comments on the
November 14, 2018 NPRM. The first two
comments were in support of the
proposed approval of OEPA’s BAT
exemption for the less than 10 tpy
sources and were from the Ohio
Chemistry Technology Council and the
Ohio Chamber of Commerce, as well as
American Municipal Power, Inc. and
the Ohio Municipal Electric
Association. The third comment was
anonymous, and it expressed concern
that the exemption was unnecessary and
instead of exempting the smaller
sources completely from the CAA and
from requiring BAT, OEPA could
provide different ways to reduce
emissions from the smaller sources
because they still emit pollutants. The
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0369. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either through
www.regulations.gov or at the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Richard
Angelbeck, Environmental Scientist, at
(312) 886–9698 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Angelbeck, Environmental
Scientist, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–9698,
angelbeck.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
ADDRESSES:
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
I. Background
II. What is EPA’s response to the comments?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Apr 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14875
comment did not indicate suggested
ways to accomplish this goal.
EPA Response: The CAA does not
require BAT for minor sources. It does,
however, require a states’ minor NSR
permit program to ensure that
construction or modification of new
sources will not interfere with attaining
or maintaining the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS). See CAA
section 110(a)(2)(C) and 40 CFR
51.160(a). The CAA also ensures that
SIP revisions such as this will not
interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS. See CAA
section 110(l). OEPA submitted a 110(l)
analysis to demonstrate that these
requirements are met. For sources that
are constructed or modified after this
SIP revision takes effect, OEPA relies on
OAC 3745–31–05(A)(1) to ensure that
construction or modification of new
sources will not interfere with attaining
or maintaining the NAAQS. For existing
sources, OEPA submitted a technical
analysis, discussed in the NPRM (83 FR
56775), demonstrating that the air
quality will not be negatively impacted
due to the small increase in emissions
from existing sources as result of the
less than 10 tpy BAT exemption. The
110(l) analysis estimated an increase of
23.53 tpy of volatile organic compound
(VOC) emissions in Ohio ozone
nonattainment areas resulting from the
rule revisions, and OEPA opted to use
emissions credits to mitigate any
possibility of adverse air quality impact
that may result from this increase in
VOC emissions. These emissions credits
reflect emissions reductions from
permanently shut down emissions units
in the Cleveland and Cincinnati areas in
Ohio. The reductions are creditable
because they are surplus, quantifiable,
permanent and federally enforceable.
OEPA has entered the 23.53 tpy of VOC
emission credits in its ‘‘tracking 110(l)
permanent retirement and SIP credits
used’’ database that it uses to track
retired emissions used as emissions
credits for offset purposes.
III. What Action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the OEPA May 22,
2018 SIP revision submittal for OAC
3745–31–05(A)(3)(a)(ii) that exempts the
smaller sources, those that emit less
than 10 tpy of each criteria pollutant,
from the need to employ BAT. Ohio
provided a section 110(l) demonstration
with the SIP revision request. In order
to offset potential increases in VOC
emissions due to the less than 10 tpy
BAT exemption, the demonstration uses
23.53 tpy of VOC emission credits from
emission units at industrial facilities
that have shut down, or permanently
reduced emissions, in the Cleveland and
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
14876
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Cincinnati areas. The emissions credits
are: 4.88 tpy of VOC emissions credits
from the permanently shut down
emission unit R010 (permanently shut
down on 7/16/2014) at the RMC USA
Inc. facility (Facility ID 0204000423) in
Ashtabula County, which is the
Cleveland, Ohio area; and 18.65 tpy of
VOC emissions from the permanently
shut down emission unit P001
(permanently shut down on 11/21/2014)
at the Rock-Tenn Converting Co. facility
(Facility ID 1431070952) in Hamilton
County, which is the Cincinnati, Ohio
area. The emissions credits have already
been retired. Upon approval of this SIP
revision, OEPA will make final in its
database the designation of these
permanent retirements as offsets for this
rule revision and EPA bases our
approval on this retirement and
designation.
EPA finds that Ohio’s exemption of
the less than 10 tpy sources from the
need to employ BAT is consistent with
Federal requirements and is approving
the rule revision as a component of the
Ohio SIP because, as discussed above,
EPA has found that the less than 10 tpy
BAT exemption does not interfere with
attainment or maintenance of any of the
NAAQS and would not interfere with
any other applicable requirements of the
CAA, and thus, along with the
permanent retirement of the emissions
credits, is approvable under CAA
section 110(l).
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of the Ohio Regulations
described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. EPA has made,
and will continue to make, these
documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA
Region 5 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
State implementation plan, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will
be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.1
1 62
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Apr 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 11, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: March 26, 2019.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.1870, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘3745–31–05’’ to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
14877
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.1870
*
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
EPA-APPROVED OHIO REGULATIONS
Ohio citation
*
*
*
3745–31–05 ........
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0103; FRL–9992–20–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Removal of
Obsolete Gasoline Volatility
Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a request
submitted by the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) on
February 5, 2018, to revise the Ohio
State Implementation Plan (SIP) under
the Clean Air Act (CAA). Ohio EPA
requested to remove from the SIP the
remaining provisions of the Ohio
Administrative Code (OAC) concerning
the State’s 7.8 pounds per square inch
(psi) Reid vapor pressure (RVP) fuel
requirements for the Cincinnati and
Dayton areas. EPA proposed to approve
this request in a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) dated December 26,
2018. In a previous action, EPA
approved the removal of the 7.8 psi RVP
fuel applicability requirements in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas as a
component of the Ohio SIP, including
the approval of a demonstration under
section 110(l) of the CAA that addressed
emissions impacts associated with the
removal of the program.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
16:08 Apr 11, 2019
*
5/1/2016
Jkt 247001
*
*
*
*
4/12/2019, [insert FedExcept for (E).
eral Register citation].
*
[FR Doc. 2019–07332 Filed 4–11–19; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
Notes
*
Permit-to-Install New Sources and Permit-to-Install and Operate Program
*
Criteria for Decision by
the Director.
*
EPA approval date
*
Chapter 3745–31
*
Ohio effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0103. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source
Program Manager, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6061,
acevedo.francisco@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. Background
On December 19, 2016, Ohio EPA
submitted a SIP revision requesting that
EPA approve the removal of the 7.8 psi
RVP fuel applicability requirements
from the Ohio SIP before the beginning
of the 2017 ozone control period. The
revision also included a section 110(l)
demonstration addressing the emissions
impacts associated with the removal of
the program. On April 7, 2017 (82 FR
16932), EPA approved the removal from
the Ohio SIP of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel
applicability requirements in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas. In that
action EPA determined that removal of
the 7.8 psi RVP fuel requirements would
not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of any of the National
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
Ambient Air Quality Standards in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas and would
not interfere with any other applicable
requirement of the CAA, and thus, was
approvable under CAA section 110(l).
Subsequently, Ohio EPA submitted a
request to EPA on February 5, 2018 to
remove the remaining low RVP
requirements from the Ohio SIP. The
NPRM provided a 30-day review and
comment period. The comment period
closed on January 25, 2019, and EPA
did not receive any comments during
the public comment period.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the revision to the
Ohio SIP submitted by Ohio EPA on
February 5, 2018, because the removal
of remaining low RVP requirements in
OAC Chapter 3745–72 from the SIP
meets all applicable requirements and it
would not interfere with reasonable
further progress or attainment of any of
the national ambient air quality
standards.
The removal of the remaining
provisions in OAC Chapter 3745–72
from the SIP are administrative in
nature; will result in no emissions
increases and not have any negative
impact on air quality in the Cincinnati
and Dayton areas.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14874-14877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07332]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0369; FRL-9992-18-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Ohio Less Than 10 TPY BAT Exemption
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving, under
the Clean Air Act (CAA), revisions to Ohio's State Implementation Plan
(SIP) as requested by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA)
on May 22, 2018. The revisions to Ohio's SIP exempt sources that emit
less than 10 tons per year (tpy) of each criteria pollutant from the
need to employ Best Available Technology (BAT).
DATES: This final rule is effective on May 13, 2019.
[[Page 14875]]
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0369. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend
that you telephone Richard Angelbeck, Environmental Scientist, at (312)
886-9698 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Angelbeck, Environmental
Scientist, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-9698, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. What is EPA's response to the comments?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On May 22, 2018, OEPA submitted a SIP revision to Ohio
Administrative Code (OAC) rule 3745-31-05(A)(3)(a)(ii). This revision
exempts the smaller emitting sources, those that emit less than 10 tpy
of each criteria pollutant, from the need to employ BAT. OEPA's less
than 10 tpy BAT exemption is in OAC 3745-31-05(A)(3)(a)(ii) and reads:
``BAT is not required if the air contaminant source was installed or
modified on or after August 3, 2006 and has the potential to emit
(PTE), taking into account air pollution controls installed on the
source, less than ten tons per year of emissions of an air contaminant
or precursor of an air contaminant for which a national ambient air
quality standard has been adopted under the Clean Air Act.''
On August 3, 2006, the Ohio General Assembly passed Senate Bill 265
(SB 265) which required OEPA to modify several of its BAT rules. One of
the changes implemented was the less than 10 tpy BAT exemption. To
implement the SB 265 changes, OEPA adopted revisions under OAC Chapter
3745-31-05(A)(3)(b) on November 20, 2006, and then moved the language
in OAC rule 3745-31-05 from paragraph (A)(3)(b) to (A)(3)(a)(ii) on
June 30, 2008. The rule language contained in OAC rule 3745-31-
05(A)(3)(a)(ii) was carried over in OAC rule 3745-31-05, which was
adopted on April 20, 2016 and is what EPA is now approving as a
revision to its SIP. On January 18, 2008, OEPA requested that EPA
approve this rule language as a revision to Ohio's SIP. EPA responded
with a June 5, 2008 letter to OEPA indicating that the request was
incomplete due to a lack of a CAA section 110(l) demonstration, thus
returning the request back to OEPA.
OEPA's May 22, 2018 SIP revision submittal included the analysis
required by section 110(l) of the CAA. This demonstration included an
extensive quantitative and qualitative analysis to show the impact that
the less than 10 tpy BAT exemption would have on emissions. OEPA's
110(l) analysis demonstrated that the air quality will not be
negatively impacted due to the small increase in emissions as result of
the less than 10 tpy BAT exemption. On November 14, 2018 (83 FR 56775),
EPA published a proposed approval of the rule revision included in the
May 22, 2018 submittal from OEPA. The specific details of OEPA's May
22, 2018 SIP submittal and the rationale for EPA's approval were
discussed in the November 14, 2018 notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
II. What is EPA's response to the comments?
EPA received three comments on the November 14, 2018 NPRM. The
first two comments were in support of the proposed approval of OEPA's
BAT exemption for the less than 10 tpy sources and were from the Ohio
Chemistry Technology Council and the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, as well
as American Municipal Power, Inc. and the Ohio Municipal Electric
Association. The third comment was anonymous, and it expressed concern
that the exemption was unnecessary and instead of exempting the smaller
sources completely from the CAA and from requiring BAT, OEPA could
provide different ways to reduce emissions from the smaller sources
because they still emit pollutants. The comment did not indicate
suggested ways to accomplish this goal.
EPA Response: The CAA does not require BAT for minor sources. It
does, however, require a states' minor NSR permit program to ensure
that construction or modification of new sources will not interfere
with attaining or maintaining the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). See CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) and 40 CFR 51.160(a).
The CAA also ensures that SIP revisions such as this will not interfere
with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS. See CAA section 110(l).
OEPA submitted a 110(l) analysis to demonstrate that these requirements
are met. For sources that are constructed or modified after this SIP
revision takes effect, OEPA relies on OAC 3745-31-05(A)(1) to ensure
that construction or modification of new sources will not interfere
with attaining or maintaining the NAAQS. For existing sources, OEPA
submitted a technical analysis, discussed in the NPRM (83 FR 56775),
demonstrating that the air quality will not be negatively impacted due
to the small increase in emissions from existing sources as result of
the less than 10 tpy BAT exemption. The 110(l) analysis estimated an
increase of 23.53 tpy of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions in
Ohio ozone nonattainment areas resulting from the rule revisions, and
OEPA opted to use emissions credits to mitigate any possibility of
adverse air quality impact that may result from this increase in VOC
emissions. These emissions credits reflect emissions reductions from
permanently shut down emissions units in the Cleveland and Cincinnati
areas in Ohio. The reductions are creditable because they are surplus,
quantifiable, permanent and federally enforceable. OEPA has entered the
23.53 tpy of VOC emission credits in its ``tracking 110(l) permanent
retirement and SIP credits used'' database that it uses to track
retired emissions used as emissions credits for offset purposes.
III. What Action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the OEPA May 22, 2018 SIP revision submittal for
OAC 3745-31-05(A)(3)(a)(ii) that exempts the smaller sources, those
that emit less than 10 tpy of each criteria pollutant, from the need to
employ BAT. Ohio provided a section 110(l) demonstration with the SIP
revision request. In order to offset potential increases in VOC
emissions due to the less than 10 tpy BAT exemption, the demonstration
uses 23.53 tpy of VOC emission credits from emission units at
industrial facilities that have shut down, or permanently reduced
emissions, in the Cleveland and
[[Page 14876]]
Cincinnati areas. The emissions credits are: 4.88 tpy of VOC emissions
credits from the permanently shut down emission unit R010 (permanently
shut down on 7/16/2014) at the RMC USA Inc. facility (Facility ID
0204000423) in Ashtabula County, which is the Cleveland, Ohio area; and
18.65 tpy of VOC emissions from the permanently shut down emission unit
P001 (permanently shut down on 11/21/2014) at the Rock-Tenn Converting
Co. facility (Facility ID 1431070952) in Hamilton County, which is the
Cincinnati, Ohio area. The emissions credits have already been retired.
Upon approval of this SIP revision, OEPA will make final in its
database the designation of these permanent retirements as offsets for
this rule revision and EPA bases our approval on this retirement and
designation.
EPA finds that Ohio's exemption of the less than 10 tpy sources
from the need to employ BAT is consistent with Federal requirements and
is approving the rule revision as a component of the Ohio SIP because,
as discussed above, EPA has found that the less than 10 tpy BAT
exemption does not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any of
the NAAQS and would not interfere with any other applicable
requirements of the CAA, and thus, along with the permanent retirement
of the emissions credits, is approvable under CAA section 110(l).
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Ohio
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region
5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by
EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110
and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of
EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 11, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 26, 2019.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.1870, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``3745-31-05'' to read as follows:
[[Page 14877]]
Sec. 52.1870 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Ohio Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohio effective
Ohio citation Title/subject date EPA approval date Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 3745-31 Permit-to-Install New Sources and Permit-to-Install and Operate Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
3745-31-05................. Criteria for 5/1/2016 4/12/2019, [insert Except for (E).
Decision by the Federal Register
Director. citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-07332 Filed 4-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P