Supplemental Evidence and Data Request on Skin Substitutes for Treating Chronic Wounds, 14945-14946 [2019-07302]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2019 / Notices
B. Purpose
FAR subpart 9.2 and the associated
clause at FAR 52.209–1, implement the
statutory requirements of 10 U.S.C. 2319
and 41 U.S.C. 3311, which allow an
agency to establish a qualification
requirement for testing or other quality
assurance demonstration that must be
completed by an offeror before award of
a contract. Under the qualification
requirements, an end item, or a
component thereof, may be required to
be prequalified.
The clause at FAR 52.209–1,
Qualification Requirements, requires
offerors who have met the qualification
requirements to identify the offeror’s
name, the manufacturer’s name,
source’s name, the item name, service
identification, and test number (to the
extent known). This eliminates the need
for an offeror to provide new
information when the offeror,
manufacturer, source, product or service
covered by qualification requirement
has already met the standards specified
by an agency in a solicitation.
The contracting officer uses the
information to determine eligibility for
award when the clause at 52.209–1 is
included in the solicitation.
Alternatively, items not yet listed may
be considered for award upon the
submission of evidence of qualification
with the offer.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Respondents: 7,998.
Responses per Respondent: 5.
Annual Responses: 39,990.
Hours per Response: 1.0.
Total Burden Hours: 39,990.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC
20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control No. 9000–0083,
Qualification Requirements, in all
correspondence.
Dated: April 8, 2019.
Janet Fry,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division,
Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy,
Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of
Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–07268 Filed 4–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Supplemental Evidence and Data
Request on Skin Substitutes for
Treating Chronic Wounds
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Request for supplemental
evidence and data submissions.
AGENCY:
The Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking
scientific information submissions from
the public. Scientific information is
being solicited to inform our review on
Skin Substitutes for Treating Chronic
Wounds, which is currently being
conducted by the AHRQ’s Evidencebased Practice Centers (EPC) Program.
Access to published and unpublished
pertinent scientific information will
improve the quality of this review.
DATES: Submission Deadline on or
before May 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES:
Email submissions: epc@
ahrq.hhs.gov.
Print submissions:
Mailing Address: Center for Evidence
and Practice Improvement, Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality,
ATTN: EPC SEADs Coordinator, 5600
Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E53A,
Rockville, MD 20857
Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.):
Center for Evidence and Practice
Improvement, Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality, ATTN: EPC
SEADs Coordinator, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Mail Stop 06E77D, Rockville,
MD 20857
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jenae Benns, Telephone: 301–427–1496
or Email: epc@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality has commissioned the
Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC)
Program to complete a review of the
evidence for Skin Substitutes for
Treating Chronic Wounds. AHRQ is
conducting this systematic review
pursuant to Section 902(a) of the Public
Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299a(a).
The EPC Program is dedicated to
identifying as many studies as possible
that are relevant to the questions for
each of its reviews. In order to do so, we
are supplementing the usual manual
and electronic database searches of the
literature by requesting information
from the public (e.g., details of studies
conducted). We are looking for studies
that report on Skin Substitutes for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14945
Treating Chronic Wounds, including
those that describe adverse events. The
entire research protocol, including the
key questions, is also available online
at: https://www.ahrq.gov/research/
findings/ta/.
This is to notify the public that the
EPC Program would find the following
information on Skin Substitutes for
Treating Chronic Wounds helpful:
D A list of completed studies that
your organization has sponsored for this
indication. In the list, please indicate
whether results are available on
ClinicalTrials.gov along with the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number.
D For completed studies that do not
have results on ClinicalTrials.gov,
please provide a summary, including
the following elements: Study number,
study period, design, methodology,
indication and diagnosis, proper use
instructions, inclusion and exclusion
criteria, primary and secondary
outcomes, baseline characteristics,
number of patients screened/eligible/
enrolled/lost to follow-up/withdrawn/
analyzed, effectiveness/efficacy, and
safety results.
D A list of ongoing studies that your
organization has sponsored for this
indication. In the list, please provide the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number or, if the
trial is not registered, the protocol for
the study including a study number, the
study period, design, methodology,
indication and diagnosis, proper use
instructions, inclusion and exclusion
criteria, and primary and secondary
outcomes.
D Description of whether the above
studies constitute ALL Phase II and
above clinical trials sponsored by your
organization for this indication and an
index outlining the relevant information
in each submitted file.
Your contribution will be very
beneficial to the EPC Program. Materials
submitted must be publicly available or
able to be made public. Materials that
are considered confidential; marketing
materials; study types not included in
the review; or information on
indications not included in the review
cannot be used by the EPC Program.
This is a voluntary request for
information, and all costs for complying
with this request must be borne by the
submitter.
The draft of this review will be posted
on AHRQ’s EPC Program website and
available for public comment for a
period of 4 weeks. If you would like to
be notified when the draft is posted,
please sign up for the email list at:
https://
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/
email-updates.
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
14946
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
The systematic review will answer the
following questions. This information is
provided as background. AHRQ is not
requesting that the public provide
answers to these questions.
The Key Questions
1. What skin substitutes currently
used to treat chronic wounds are being
regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) under the
following pathways: Premarket
Approval (PMA), Premarket Notification
(510[k]), Section 361 of the Public
Health Service Act (21 CFR 1270 and
1271)?
2. What classification systems have
been developed to categorize skin
substitutes?
a. What are important skin substitute
parameters and active components
currently being used when classifying
skin substitutes?
3. What are the study design
characteristics (such as those listed
below) in each included investigation
for each chronic wound type?
a. Comparator to skin substitute
b. Inclusion/exclusion criteria of
patients including at least age, gender,
and general health requirements (e.g.,
status of HbA1c, diabetes, peripheral
vascular disease, obesity, smoking,
renal)
c. Inclusion/exclusion criteria of
wounds including at least wound
type, wound size/depth/duration/
severity, vascular status, infection
status, and prior treatment
requirements (e.g., no treatment with
growth factors or negative pressure
wound therapy)
d. Patient characteristics of enrollees
including at least age, gender, general
health (e.g., status of HbA1c, diabetes,
peripheral vascular disease, obesity,
smoking, renal), and prior and
concurrent wound treatments
e. Wound characteristics of enrollees
including at least wound type, wound
size/depth/duration/severity, vascular
status, and infection status
f. Basic study design and conduct
information including at least method
of patient enrollment, care setting,
and use of run-in period
g. Definition of wound characteristics:
definition of ‘‘failure to heal’’, and
definition of a successfully healed
wound
h. Method of applying skin substitutes
including provider, frequency of
application, definition of standard of
care, and handling of infections
i. Measurement and assessment
methods including method of
assessment(s); frequency and time
points for assessment(s); and blinding
of assessors
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
j. Statistical methods including power
calculations, intent-to-treat analysis
for studies designed to test
superiority, and handling of drop-outs
4. What are the outcomes of treatment
strategies including skin substitutes
alone and/or in addition to other wound
care modalities compared to other
wound care modalities in patients with
different types of chronic wounds, for
patient oriented outcomes such as the
following? Consider at least:
a. Number/percentage of completely
closed/healed wounds (skin closure
with complete re-epithelialization
without drainage or dressing
requirements versus failure to heal)
b. Time to complete wound closure
c. Wound reoccurrence (include time
when initial wound healing was
measured, and follow-up to assess
durability of healed wounds)
d. Wound infection
e. Need for amputation
f. Need for hospitalization (frequency
and duration)
g. Return to baseline activities of daily
living and function
h. Pain reduction
i. Exudate and odor reduction
j. Adverse effects (besides those above)
5. What skin substitutes are currently
being investigated in ongoing trials?
6. What best practices in study design
could be used to produce high quality
evidence on skin substitutes?
Gopal Khanna,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2019–07302 Filed 4–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project
‘‘Evaluating and Implementing the Six
Building Blocks Team Approach to
Improve Opioid Management in Primary
Care.’’
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by June 11, 2019.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by
email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
emails at doris.lefkowitz@
AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Proposed Project
Evaluating and Implementing the Six
Building Blocks Team Approach To
Improve Opioid Management in Primary
Care
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521,
AHRQ invites the public to comment on
this proposed information collection.
The project ‘‘Evaluating and
Implementing the Six Building Blocks
Team Approach to Improve Opioid
Management in Primary Care’’ fully
supports AHRQ’s mission. The ultimate
aim of this project is to further validate
and expand the Six Building Blocks to
Safer Opioid Management (6BBs)
intervention and its associated resources
and guidance to support primary care
providers in safer opioid prescribing.
Opioid overdose deaths have
increased dramatically since 1999, and
despite recent decreases in the national
opioid prescribing rate, prescribing rates
remain high in many U.S. counties.
Primary care providers (PCPs) are
responsible for about half of all
dispensed opioid pain relievers. To
address the emerging opioid epidemic,
the Six Building Blocks to Safer Opioid
Management (6BBs) Toolkit has been
developed to support primary care
providers in safer opioid prescribing,
largely concordant with the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention’s
Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for
Chronic Pain. The 6BBs is a structured,
systems-based approach for improving
management of patients on long-term
opioid therapy that targets six work
areas a primary care practice needs to
redesign in order to improve their
clinic’s management of patients on longterm opioid therapy.
Building upon previous work
supported by AHRQ to address the
opioid epidemic, this research has the
following goals:
1. To improve the guidance for the
6BBs Toolkit,
2. To further implement the 6BBs in
primary care practices, and
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14945-14946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07302]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Supplemental Evidence and Data Request on Skin Substitutes for
Treating Chronic Wounds
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Request for supplemental evidence and data submissions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is
seeking scientific information submissions from the public. Scientific
information is being solicited to inform our review on Skin Substitutes
for Treating Chronic Wounds, which is currently being conducted by the
AHRQ's Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Program. Access to
published and unpublished pertinent scientific information will improve
the quality of this review.
DATES: Submission Deadline on or before May 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES:
Email submissions: [email protected].
Print submissions:
Mailing Address: Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality, ATTN: EPC SEADs Coordinator, 5600
Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E53A, Rockville, MD 20857
Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.): Center for Evidence and Practice
Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ATTN: EPC
SEADs Coordinator, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E77D, Rockville, MD
20857
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenae Benns, Telephone: 301-427-1496
or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality has commissioned the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC)
Program to complete a review of the evidence for Skin Substitutes for
Treating Chronic Wounds. AHRQ is conducting this systematic review
pursuant to Section 902(a) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C.
299a(a).
The EPC Program is dedicated to identifying as many studies as
possible that are relevant to the questions for each of its reviews. In
order to do so, we are supplementing the usual manual and electronic
database searches of the literature by requesting information from the
public (e.g., details of studies conducted). We are looking for studies
that report on Skin Substitutes for Treating Chronic Wounds, including
those that describe adverse events. The entire research protocol,
including the key questions, is also available online at: https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/ta/.
This is to notify the public that the EPC Program would find the
following information on Skin Substitutes for Treating Chronic Wounds
helpful:
[ssquf] A list of completed studies that your organization has
sponsored for this indication. In the list, please indicate whether
results are available on ClinicalTrials.gov along with the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number.
[ssquf] For completed studies that do not have results on
ClinicalTrials.gov, please provide a summary, including the following
elements: Study number, study period, design, methodology, indication
and diagnosis, proper use instructions, inclusion and exclusion
criteria, primary and secondary outcomes, baseline characteristics,
number of patients screened/eligible/enrolled/lost to follow-up/
withdrawn/analyzed, effectiveness/efficacy, and safety results.
[ssquf] A list of ongoing studies that your organization has
sponsored for this indication. In the list, please provide the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number or, if the trial is not registered, the
protocol for the study including a study number, the study period,
design, methodology, indication and diagnosis, proper use instructions,
inclusion and exclusion criteria, and primary and secondary outcomes.
[ssquf] Description of whether the above studies constitute ALL
Phase II and above clinical trials sponsored by your organization for
this indication and an index outlining the relevant information in each
submitted file.
Your contribution will be very beneficial to the EPC Program.
Materials submitted must be publicly available or able to be made
public. Materials that are considered confidential; marketing
materials; study types not included in the review; or information on
indications not included in the review cannot be used by the EPC
Program. This is a voluntary request for information, and all costs for
complying with this request must be borne by the submitter.
The draft of this review will be posted on AHRQ's EPC Program
website and available for public comment for a period of 4 weeks. If
you would like to be notified when the draft is posted, please sign up
for the email list at: https://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/email-updates.
[[Page 14946]]
The systematic review will answer the following questions. This
information is provided as background. AHRQ is not requesting that the
public provide answers to these questions.
The Key Questions
1. What skin substitutes currently used to treat chronic wounds are
being regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under
the following pathways: Premarket Approval (PMA), Premarket
Notification (510[k]), Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (21
CFR 1270 and 1271)?
2. What classification systems have been developed to categorize
skin substitutes?
a. What are important skin substitute parameters and active
components currently being used when classifying skin substitutes?
3. What are the study design characteristics (such as those listed
below) in each included investigation for each chronic wound type?
a. Comparator to skin substitute
b. Inclusion/exclusion criteria of patients including at least age,
gender, and general health requirements (e.g., status of HbA1c,
diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, smoking, renal)
c. Inclusion/exclusion criteria of wounds including at least wound
type, wound size/depth/duration/severity, vascular status, infection
status, and prior treatment requirements (e.g., no treatment with
growth factors or negative pressure wound therapy)
d. Patient characteristics of enrollees including at least age, gender,
general health (e.g., status of HbA1c, diabetes, peripheral vascular
disease, obesity, smoking, renal), and prior and concurrent wound
treatments
e. Wound characteristics of enrollees including at least wound type,
wound size/depth/duration/severity, vascular status, and infection
status
f. Basic study design and conduct information including at least method
of patient enrollment, care setting, and use of run-in period
g. Definition of wound characteristics: definition of ``failure to
heal'', and definition of a successfully healed wound
h. Method of applying skin substitutes including provider, frequency of
application, definition of standard of care, and handling of infections
i. Measurement and assessment methods including method of
assessment(s); frequency and time points for assessment(s); and
blinding of assessors
j. Statistical methods including power calculations, intent-to-treat
analysis for studies designed to test superiority, and handling of
drop-outs
4. What are the outcomes of treatment strategies including skin
substitutes alone and/or in addition to other wound care modalities
compared to other wound care modalities in patients with different
types of chronic wounds, for patient oriented outcomes such as the
following? Consider at least:
a. Number/percentage of completely closed/healed wounds (skin closure
with complete re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing
requirements versus failure to heal)
b. Time to complete wound closure
c. Wound reoccurrence (include time when initial wound healing was
measured, and follow-up to assess durability of healed wounds)
d. Wound infection
e. Need for amputation
f. Need for hospitalization (frequency and duration)
g. Return to baseline activities of daily living and function
h. Pain reduction
i. Exudate and odor reduction
j. Adverse effects (besides those above)
5. What skin substitutes are currently being investigated in
ongoing trials?
6. What best practices in study design could be used to produce
high quality evidence on skin substitutes?
Gopal Khanna,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2019-07302 Filed 4-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P