Statistical Policy Directive No. 3: Compilation, Release, and Evaluation of Principal Federal Economic Indicators. Timing of Public Comments by Employees of the Executive Branch, 14682-14684 [2019-07172]

Download as PDF 14682 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2019 / Notices estimated for an average respondent to respond: Average reporting time (min) Total burden hours Purpose of contact Mail, Fax, Email, telephone ............................ Email and telephone ....................................... 84 84 75 2 105 3 Email and telephone ....................................... Data collection ................................................ Verify facility operational status and point-ofcontact. Data quality follow-up validation .................... 84 7 10 Total ......................................................... ......................................................................... 84 84 118 The questionnaire will be sent to 84 Indian country correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Based on prior years’ reporting, we estimate a reporting time of 75 minutes for the SJIC questionnaire. If needed, jail respondents will also be contacted by email or telephone to verify data quality issues. Thus, we expect that in any data collection year 84 SJIC respondents will have an average reporting time of 2 minutes to verify facility operational status and point-of-contact, 75 minutes for the data collection, and an additional 7 minutes for data quality follow-up validation, for a total burden 84 minutes per facility. Annually, this results in a total burden estimate for SJIC of 118 hours. If additional information is required, contact: Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: April 8, 2019. Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2019–07167 Filed 4–10–19; 8:45 a.m.] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Statistical Policy Directive No. 3: Compilation, Release, and Evaluation of Principal Federal Economic Indicators. Timing of Public Comments by Employees of the Executive Branch Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President. ACTION: Notice of solicitation of comments. AGENCY: amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES Number of responses Reporting mode Under the Budget and Accounting Procedures Act of 1950 and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Apr 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 (‘‘the PRA’’), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issues a request for comments on the continued relevance of one provision within Statistical Policy Directive No. 3: Compilation, Release, and Evaluation of Principal Federal Economic Indicators (50 FR 38932, Sep. 25, 1985) (‘‘Directive No. 3’’). Directive No. 3 remains a robust, comprehensive source of guidance for statistical series produced by Federal statistical agencies and recognized statistical units. The government and private sector widely watch and heavily rely upon those statistical series as indicators of the current condition and direction of the economy. The procedures in Directive No. 3, published in 1985, were designed to ensure equitable, policy-neutral, and timely release and dissemination of Principal Federal Economic Indicators (‘‘PFEIs’’). The goals of Directive No. 3 remain sound, and changing those overall goals is not the subject of this notice; however, advances in information dissemination technology lead OMB to seek comment on the continued relevance of the provision that prohibits employees of the Executive Branch from commenting publicly about the release of PFEIs until at least one hour following their release. For example, in addition to more traditional means of dissemination (e.g., newspaper or radio), agencies now disseminate their data releases to the public through the internet, including on their own websites, allowing instantaneous and equitable access to the releases. In particular, OMB seeks comment on whether advances in information dissemination technology since Directive No. 3’s issuance in 1985 could provide for meeting the goals of Directive No. 3 to ensure equitable, policy-neutral, and timely release and dissemination of PFEIs under a shorter time delay, including no time delay at all. Additional discussion of the request for public comment may be found in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Electronic Availability: This notice is available on the internet on the OMB website at https://www.whitehouse.gov/ omb/. Federal Register notices are also available electronically at https:// www.federalregister.gov/. To ensure consideration of comments on this Notice, they must be received no later than 60 days from the publication date of this notice. Because of delays in the receipt of regular mail related to security screening, respondents are encouraged to send comments electronically (see ADDRESSES, below). DATES: Comments may be addressed to: Nancy Potok, Chief Statistician, Office of Management and Budget, fax number (202) 395–7245. Email comments may be sent to Statistical_Directives@omb.eop.gov, with the subject ‘‘Directive No. 3.’’ Alternatively, comments may be sent via www.regulations.gov—a Federal EGovernment website that allows the public to find, review, and submit comments on documents that agencies have published in the Federal Register and that are open for comment. Simply type ‘‘OMB–2019–0001’’ (in quotes) in the Comment or Submission search box, click Go, and follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments received by the date specified above will be included as part of the official record. Comments submitted in response to this notice may be made available to the public through relevant websites. For this reason, please do not include in your comments information of a confidential nature, such as sensitive personal information or proprietary information. If you send an email comment, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket. Please note that responses to this public comment request containing any routine notice about the confidentiality of the communication will be treated as public comments that may be made available to ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2019 / Notices the public notwithstanding the inclusion of the routine notice. For information about this request for comments, contact Kerrie Leslie, Office of Management and Budget, 9215 New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, telephone (202) 395–1093, email Statistical_Directives@ omb.eop.gov with the subject ‘‘More Info: Directive No. 3.’’ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The Nation relies on the flow of relevant, accurate, timely, reliable, and objective statistics to support the decisions of governments, businesses, individuals, households, and other organizations. Federal statistical agencies release many of the statistics available about the United States’ economy, population, natural resources, environment, and public and private institutions. It is the responsibility of Federal agencies engaging in statistical work to support the quality and accessibility of the Federal statistical information our Nation uses to monitor and assess performance, progress, and needs. In its role as coordinator of the Federal statistical system under the PRA, OMB, among other responsibilities, is required to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of the system. A key method OMB uses to achieve this responsibility is the promulgation, maintenance, and oversight of Government-wide principles, policies, standards, and guidelines concerning the development, presentation, and dissemination of statistical products. OMB’s Statistical Policy Directive Nos. 3 and 4 are designed to preserve and enhance the objectivity and transparency, in fact and in perception, of the processes used to release and disseminate the statistical products of Federal statistical agencies. The procedures in these directives are intended to ensure that statistical data releases adhere to data quality standards through equitable, policy-neutral, and timely release of information to the general public. The preamble to Statistical Policy Directive No. 4 (‘‘Directive No. 4’’) summarizes the history of Directive No. 3 as well as the long-standing concern about the need to maintain public confidence in the objectivity of Federal statistics. For example, in 1962, the President’s Committee to Appraise Employment and Unemployment Statistics, stated: 1 amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1 ‘‘Measuring Employment and Unemployment.’’ U.S. President’s Committee to Appraise Employment and Unemployment Statistics. Transmitted September 27, 1962. p20. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Apr 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 The need to publish the information in a nonpolitical context cannot be overemphasized. * * * a sharper line should be drawn between the release of the statistics and their accompanying explanation and analysis, on the one hand, and the more general type of policy-oriented comment which is a function of the official responsible for policy making, on the other. In 1971, the Administration was widely criticized for the way it publicly characterized some Bureau of Labor Statistics unemployment data at the time of their release. In response, the Congress instituted the monthly Joint Economic Committee hearings on the unemployment rate, and OMB issued Directive No. 3 to provide guidance to Executive branch agencies on the compilation and release of PFEIs. Directive No. 3 provides for the designation of statistical series that provide timely measures of economic activity as Principal Economic Indicators, and requires prompt but orderly release of such indicators. The stated purposes of Directive No. 3 are to preserve the time value of the economic indicators, strike a balance between timeliness and accuracy, provide for periodic evaluation of each indicator, prevent early access to information that may affect financial and commodity markets, and preserve the distinction between the policy-neutral release of data by statistical agencies and their interpretation by policy officials. Thus, Directive No. 3 is designed to promote public confidence in Federal statistics and in the system responsible for their production, as well as trust in the purely statistical basis of PFEIs used in the Federal Government’s policy decisions. Since OMB’s publication of Directive No. 3, this theme and the importance of OMB’s role in implementation has been reinforced. In 1995, the Congress reauthorized the PRA, including OMB’s responsibility for coordination of the Federal statistical system to ensure the integrity, objectivity, impartiality, utility, and confidentiality of information collected for statistical purposes. In December 2000, the Congress passed and the President signed into law what has come to be known as the Information Quality Act (44 U.S.C. 3516 note), which directed OMB to issue Government-wide information quality guidelines to ensure the ‘‘quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity’’ of all information, including statistical information, disseminated by Federal agencies. In 2005, the National Research Council (‘‘NRC’’) of the National PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14683 Academy of Sciences 2 stated that for Federal Statistical Agencies to demonstrate their credibility, they: * * * must be, and must be perceived to be, free of political interference and policy advocacy. * * * Without the credibility that comes from a strong degree of independence, users may lose trust in the accuracy and objectivity of the agency’s data, and data providers may become less willing to cooperate with agency requests. * * * [A statistical agency] must be impartial and avoid even the appearance that its collection, analysis, and reporting processes might be manipulated for political purposes. * * * In 2014, consistent with these comments by the NRC, as well as those of the Government Accountability Office’s report entitled Data Quality: Expanded Use of Key Dissemination Practices Would Further Safeguard the Integrity of Federal Statistical Data (GAO–06–607), OMB issued Statistical Policy Directive No. 1: Fundamental Responsibilities of Federal Statistical Agencies and Recognized Statistical Units (79 FR 71610, Dec. 2, 2014). Further, in January 2019, Congress passed the Foundations for EvidenceBased Policymaking Act of 2018, which in section 3563 of title 44 codified the responsibilities of statistical agencies and units subject to section 3563 to: * * * ‘‘(A) produce and disseminate relevant and timely statistical information; ‘‘(B) conduct credible and accurate statistical activities; ‘‘(C) conduct objective statistical activities; and ‘‘(D) protect the trust of information providers by ensuring the confidentiality and exclusive statistical use of their responses. * * * Dissemination of PFEIs must continue to adhere to these statutory requirements. However, advances in information dissemination technology may provide for meeting these requirements and the goals outlined in Directive No. 3 in different procedural ways than when Directive No. 3 was issued in 1985. In particular, the internet has, for decades, provided broader, timelier dissemination of information to the public than more historic means of dissemination (e.g., newspaper or radio), as well as provided for attribution of the information to particular entities. Federal Statistical Agencies 3 have long had their own 2 National Research Council. 2005. Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency: Third Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11252. 3 A Federal Statistical Agency is an agency or organizational unit of the Executive Branch whose activities are predominantly the collection, compilation, processing, or analysis of information for statistical purposes. See 44 U.S.C. 3561(11). E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1 14684 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2019 / Notices amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES websites, providing a platform on which to disseminate their data releases and policy-neutral analysis, and, in many cases, also have other ways on the internet, such as social media accounts, to disseminate their data releases and policy-neutral analysis. In short, modern forms of dissemination, being more speedy and comprehensive, may reduce the need for such a long time period between the release of PFEIs, and policy comment on them by employees of the Executive Branch. Request for Comments: The full text of Directive No. 3, as issued in 1985, is available at https:// www.whitehouse.gov/sites/ whitehouse.gov/files/omb/assets/OMB/ inforeg/statpolicy/dir_3_fr_ 09251985.pdf. This notice requests comment on the continued relevance of the provision of Directive No. 3 that prohibits public comment by employees of the Executive Branch from speaking about the release until at least one hour following the release of PFEIs. In particular, OMB seeks comment on whether advances in information dissemination technology since Directive No. 3’s issuance in 1985 could provide for meeting the goals of Directive No. 3 to ensure equitable, policy-neutral, and timely release and dissemination of PFEIs under a shorter time delay, including no time delay at all. The text relevant to the specified provision for comment appears within the last paragraph of Section 5. For ease of review, the abbreviated text of Section 5 is provided below, and the text describing the current limitation on Executive Branch employees is provided in bolded text. 5. Release Procedure. * * * Except for the authorized distribution described in this section, agencies shall ensure that no information or data estimates are released before the official release time. The agency will provide prerelease information to the President, through the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, as soon as it is available. The agency may grant others prerelease access only under the following conditions: (a) The agency head must establish whatever security arrangements are necessary and impose whatever conditions on the granting of access are necessary to ensure that there is no unauthorized dissemination or use. (b) The agency head shall ensure that any person granted access has been fully informed of and agreed to these conditions. (c) Any prerelease of information under an embargo shall not precede the official release time by more than 30 minutes. (d) In all cases, prerelease access shall precede the official release time only to the extent necessary for an orderly review of the data. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Apr 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 All employees of the Executive Branch who receive prerelease distribution of information and data estimates as authorized above are responsible for assuring that there is no release prior to the official release time. Except for members of the staff of the agency issuing the principal economic indicator who have been designated by the agency head to provide technical explanations of the data, employees of the Executive Branch shall not comment publicly on the data until at least one hour after the official release time. Any changes to the text from Section 5 would neither affect nor replace any of the other standards and guidelines articulated in Directive No. 3. OMB seeks comments from all interested parties, including data users, businesses, and the media, on the continued relevance of the one-hour delay identified in the provision that ‘‘employees of the Executive Branch shall not comment publicly on the data until at least one hour after the official release time.’’ In particular, OMB seeks comment about maintaining the onehour delay, as well as reducing the time duration of the delay to some amount less than one hour, including consideration of the option of eliminating the delay entirely. Dominic Mancini, Deputy Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. [FR Doc. 2019–07172 Filed 4–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3110–01–P Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining to Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate (SBE) programs and activities. Agenda • SBE Directorate Update • To Secure Knowledge • NSF Distinguished Lecture in the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences: Science Comprehension Without Curiosity is No Virtue, and Curiosity Without Comprehension No Vice, Dr. Dan Kahan, Yale University • SBE research to address Office of Management and Budget/Office of Scientific and Technology Policy Scientific Priorities • Pursuing effective SBE partnerships • Contributions of the SBE Sciences to National Security • Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering (CEOSE) Update • Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education (AC–ERE) Update • SBE Sciences and NSF’s Big Ideas • Wrap-up, Assignments, Planning for Next SBE AC Meeting Dated: April 8, 2019. Crystal Robinson, Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 2019–07203 Filed 4–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; Notice of Meeting In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting: Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (#1171). Date and Time: May 2, 2019; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., May 3, 2019; 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Place: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room E2020, Alexandria, VA 22314. Type of Meeting: Open. Contact Person: Dr. Deborah Olster, Office of the Assistant Director, Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703– 292–8700. Summary of Minutes: Posted on SBE advisory committee website at: https:// www.nsf.gov/sbe/advisory.jsp. PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. MC2019–116 and CP2019–125; MC2019–117 and CP2019–126; MC2019–118 and CP2019–127] New Postal Products Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing for the Commission’s consideration concerning negotiated service agreements. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: Comments are due: April 15, 2019. SUMMARY: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at http:// www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14682-14684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Statistical Policy Directive No. 3: Compilation, Release, and 
Evaluation of Principal Federal Economic Indicators. Timing of Public 
Comments by Employees of the Executive Branch

AGENCY: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation of comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Budget and Accounting Procedures Act of 1950 and the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``the PRA''), the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) issues a request for comments on the continued 
relevance of one provision within Statistical Policy Directive No. 3: 
Compilation, Release, and Evaluation of Principal Federal Economic 
Indicators (50 FR 38932, Sep. 25, 1985) (``Directive No. 3''). 
Directive No. 3 remains a robust, comprehensive source of guidance for 
statistical series produced by Federal statistical agencies and 
recognized statistical units. The government and private sector widely 
watch and heavily rely upon those statistical series as indicators of 
the current condition and direction of the economy. The procedures in 
Directive No. 3, published in 1985, were designed to ensure equitable, 
policy-neutral, and timely release and dissemination of Principal 
Federal Economic Indicators (``PFEIs''). The goals of Directive No. 3 
remain sound, and changing those overall goals is not the subject of 
this notice; however, advances in information dissemination technology 
lead OMB to seek comment on the continued relevance of the provision 
that prohibits employees of the Executive Branch from commenting 
publicly about the release of PFEIs until at least one hour following 
their release. For example, in addition to more traditional means of 
dissemination (e.g., newspaper or radio), agencies now disseminate 
their data releases to the public through the internet, including on 
their own websites, allowing instantaneous and equitable access to the 
releases. In particular, OMB seeks comment on whether advances in 
information dissemination technology since Directive No. 3's issuance 
in 1985 could provide for meeting the goals of Directive No. 3 to 
ensure equitable, policy-neutral, and timely release and dissemination 
of PFEIs under a shorter time delay, including no time delay at all.
    Additional discussion of the request for public comment may be 
found in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
    Electronic Availability: This notice is available on the internet 
on the OMB website at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/. Federal Register 
notices are also available electronically at https://www.federalregister.gov/.

DATES: To ensure consideration of comments on this Notice, they must be 
received no later than 60 days from the publication date of this 
notice. Because of delays in the receipt of regular mail related to 
security screening, respondents are encouraged to send comments 
electronically (see ADDRESSES, below).

ADDRESSES: Comments may be addressed to: Nancy Potok, Chief 
Statistician, Office of Management and Budget, fax number (202) 395-
7245. Email comments may be sent to [email protected], 
with the subject ``Directive No. 3.'' Alternatively, comments may be 
sent via www.regulations.gov--a Federal E-Government website that 
allows the public to find, review, and submit comments on documents 
that agencies have published in the Federal Register and that are open 
for comment. Simply type ``OMB-2019-0001'' (in quotes) in the Comment 
or Submission search box, click Go, and follow the instructions for 
submitting comments. Comments received by the date specified above will 
be included as part of the official record.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice may be made available 
to the public through relevant websites. For this reason, please do not 
include in your comments information of a confidential nature, such as 
sensitive personal information or proprietary information. If you send 
an email comment, your email address will be automatically captured and 
included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket. 
Please note that responses to this public comment request containing 
any routine notice about the confidentiality of the communication will 
be treated as public comments that may be made available to

[[Page 14683]]

the public notwithstanding the inclusion of the routine notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this request for 
comments, contact Kerrie Leslie, Office of Management and Budget, 9215 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, telephone (202) 
395-1093, email [email protected] with the subject 
``More Info: Directive No. 3.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The Nation relies on the flow of 
relevant, accurate, timely, reliable, and objective statistics to 
support the decisions of governments, businesses, individuals, 
households, and other organizations. Federal statistical agencies 
release many of the statistics available about the United States' 
economy, population, natural resources, environment, and public and 
private institutions. It is the responsibility of Federal agencies 
engaging in statistical work to support the quality and accessibility 
of the Federal statistical information our Nation uses to monitor and 
assess performance, progress, and needs. In its role as coordinator of 
the Federal statistical system under the PRA, OMB, among other 
responsibilities, is required to ensure the efficiency and 
effectiveness of the system. A key method OMB uses to achieve this 
responsibility is the promulgation, maintenance, and oversight of 
Government-wide principles, policies, standards, and guidelines 
concerning the development, presentation, and dissemination of 
statistical products.
    OMB's Statistical Policy Directive Nos. 3 and 4 are designed to 
preserve and enhance the objectivity and transparency, in fact and in 
perception, of the processes used to release and disseminate the 
statistical products of Federal statistical agencies. The procedures in 
these directives are intended to ensure that statistical data releases 
adhere to data quality standards through equitable, policy-neutral, and 
timely release of information to the general public.
    The preamble to Statistical Policy Directive No. 4 (``Directive No. 
4'') summarizes the history of Directive No. 3 as well as the long-
standing concern about the need to maintain public confidence in the 
objectivity of Federal statistics. For example, in 1962, the 
President's Committee to Appraise Employment and Unemployment 
Statistics, stated: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ``Measuring Employment and Unemployment.'' U.S. President's 
Committee to Appraise Employment and Unemployment Statistics. 
Transmitted September 27, 1962. p20.

    The need to publish the information in a nonpolitical context 
cannot be overemphasized. * * * a sharper line should be drawn 
between the release of the statistics and their accompanying 
explanation and analysis, on the one hand, and the more general type 
of policy-oriented comment which is a function of the official 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
responsible for policy making, on the other.

    In 1971, the Administration was widely criticized for the way it 
publicly characterized some Bureau of Labor Statistics unemployment 
data at the time of their release. In response, the Congress instituted 
the monthly Joint Economic Committee hearings on the unemployment rate, 
and OMB issued Directive No. 3 to provide guidance to Executive branch 
agencies on the compilation and release of PFEIs. Directive No. 3 
provides for the designation of statistical series that provide timely 
measures of economic activity as Principal Economic Indicators, and 
requires prompt but orderly release of such indicators. The stated 
purposes of Directive No. 3 are to preserve the time value of the 
economic indicators, strike a balance between timeliness and accuracy, 
provide for periodic evaluation of each indicator, prevent early access 
to information that may affect financial and commodity markets, and 
preserve the distinction between the policy-neutral release of data by 
statistical agencies and their interpretation by policy officials. 
Thus, Directive No. 3 is designed to promote public confidence in 
Federal statistics and in the system responsible for their production, 
as well as trust in the purely statistical basis of PFEIs used in the 
Federal Government's policy decisions.
    Since OMB's publication of Directive No. 3, this theme and the 
importance of OMB's role in implementation has been reinforced. In 
1995, the Congress reauthorized the PRA, including OMB's responsibility 
for coordination of the Federal statistical system to ensure the 
integrity, objectivity, impartiality, utility, and confidentiality of 
information collected for statistical purposes. In December 2000, the 
Congress passed and the President signed into law what has come to be 
known as the Information Quality Act (44 U.S.C. 3516 note), which 
directed OMB to issue Government-wide information quality guidelines to 
ensure the ``quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity'' of all 
information, including statistical information, disseminated by Federal 
agencies.
    In 2005, the National Research Council (``NRC'') of the National 
Academy of Sciences \2\ stated that for Federal Statistical Agencies to 
demonstrate their credibility, they:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ National Research Council. 2005. Principles and Practices 
for a Federal Statistical Agency: Third Edition. Washington, DC: The 
National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11252.

* * * must be, and must be perceived to be, free of political 
interference and policy advocacy. * * * Without the credibility that 
comes from a strong degree of independence, users may lose trust in 
the accuracy and objectivity of the agency's data, and data 
providers may become less willing to cooperate with agency requests. 
* * * [A statistical agency] must be impartial and avoid even the 
appearance that its collection, analysis, and reporting processes 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
might be manipulated for political purposes. * * *

    In 2014, consistent with these comments by the NRC, as well as 
those of the Government Accountability Office's report entitled Data 
Quality: Expanded Use of Key Dissemination Practices Would Further 
Safeguard the Integrity of Federal Statistical Data (GAO-06-607), OMB 
issued Statistical Policy Directive No. 1: Fundamental Responsibilities 
of Federal Statistical Agencies and Recognized Statistical Units (79 FR 
71610, Dec. 2, 2014). Further, in January 2019, Congress passed the 
Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018, which in 
section 3563 of title 44 codified the responsibilities of statistical 
agencies and units subject to section 3563 to:

* * * ``(A) produce and disseminate relevant and timely statistical 
information;
 ``(B) conduct credible and accurate statistical activities;
 ``(C) conduct objective statistical activities; and
``(D) protect the trust of information providers by ensuring the 
confidentiality and exclusive statistical use of their responses. * 
* *

    Dissemination of PFEIs must continue to adhere to these statutory 
requirements. However, advances in information dissemination technology 
may provide for meeting these requirements and the goals outlined in 
Directive No. 3 in different procedural ways than when Directive No. 3 
was issued in 1985. In particular, the internet has, for decades, 
provided broader, timelier dissemination of information to the public 
than more historic means of dissemination (e.g., newspaper or radio), 
as well as provided for attribution of the information to particular 
entities. Federal Statistical Agencies \3\ have long had their own

[[Page 14684]]

websites, providing a platform on which to disseminate their data 
releases and policy-neutral analysis, and, in many cases, also have 
other ways on the internet, such as social media accounts, to 
disseminate their data releases and policy-neutral analysis. In short, 
modern forms of dissemination, being more speedy and comprehensive, may 
reduce the need for such a long time period between the release of 
PFEIs, and policy comment on them by employees of the Executive Branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Federal Statistical Agency is an agency or organizational 
unit of the Executive Branch whose activities are predominantly the 
collection, compilation, processing, or analysis of information for 
statistical purposes. See 44 U.S.C. 3561(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Request for Comments: The full text of Directive No. 3, as issued 
in 1985, is available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/assets/OMB/inforeg/statpolicy/dir_3_fr_09251985.pdf. This notice requests comment on the continued 
relevance of the provision of Directive No. 3 that prohibits public 
comment by employees of the Executive Branch from speaking about the 
release until at least one hour following the release of PFEIs. In 
particular, OMB seeks comment on whether advances in information 
dissemination technology since Directive No. 3's issuance in 1985 could 
provide for meeting the goals of Directive No. 3 to ensure equitable, 
policy-neutral, and timely release and dissemination of PFEIs under a 
shorter time delay, including no time delay at all.
    The text relevant to the specified provision for comment appears 
within the last paragraph of Section 5. For ease of review, the 
abbreviated text of Section 5 is provided below, and the text 
describing the current limitation on Executive Branch employees is 
provided in bolded text.

    5. Release Procedure. * * * Except for the authorized 
distribution described in this section, agencies shall ensure that 
no information or data estimates are released before the official 
release time.
    The agency will provide prerelease information to the President, 
through the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, as soon as 
it is available. The agency may grant others prerelease access only 
under the following conditions:
    (a) The agency head must establish whatever security 
arrangements are necessary and impose whatever conditions on the 
granting of access are necessary to ensure that there is no 
unauthorized dissemination or use.
    (b) The agency head shall ensure that any person granted access 
has been fully informed of and agreed to these conditions.
 (c) Any prerelease of information under an embargo shall not 
precede the official release time by more than 30 minutes.
 (d) In all cases, prerelease access shall precede the official 
release time only to the extent necessary for an orderly review of 
the data.
 All employees of the Executive Branch who receive prerelease 
distribution of information and data estimates as authorized above 
are responsible for assuring that there is no release prior to the 
official release time. Except for members of the staff of the agency 
issuing the principal economic indicator who have been designated by 
the agency head to provide technical explanations of the data, 
employees of the Executive Branch shall not comment publicly on the 
data until at least one hour after the official release time.

Any changes to the text from Section 5 would neither affect nor replace 
any of the other standards and guidelines articulated in Directive No. 
3.
    OMB seeks comments from all interested parties, including data 
users, businesses, and the media, on the continued relevance of the 
one-hour delay identified in the provision that ``employees of the 
Executive Branch shall not comment publicly on the data until at least 
one hour after the official release time.'' In particular, OMB seeks 
comment about maintaining the one-hour delay, as well as reducing the 
time duration of the delay to some amount less than one hour, including 
consideration of the option of eliminating the delay entirely.

Dominic Mancini,
Deputy Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019-07172 Filed 4-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3110-01-P