FirstEnergy Corp.; FirstEnergy Solutions; FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, 14136-14141 [2019-06987]
Download as PDF
14136
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2019 / Notices
Written comments should be
received on or before June 10, 2019 to
be assured consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the information collections to Dawn
Wolfgang, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Suite
5080, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; Fax
No. 703–519–8579; or Email at
PRAComments@NCUA.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Address requests for additional
information to Dawn Wolfgang at the
address above or telephone 703–548–
2279.
DATES:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Number: 3133–0039.
Title: Borrowed Funds from Natural
Persons, 12 CFR 701.38.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: Section 701.38 of the NCUA
regulations grants federal credit unions
the authority to borrow funds from a
natural person as long as they maintain
a signed promissory note which
includes the terms and conditions of
maturity, repayment, interest rate,
method of computation and method of
payment; and the promissory note and
any advertisements for borrowing have
clearly visible language stating that the
note represents money borrowed by the
credit union and does not represent
shares and is not insured by the
National Credit Union Insurance Fund
(NCUSIF). NCUA will use this
information to ensure a credit union’s
natural person borrowings are in
compliance and address all regulatory
and safety and soundness requirements.
Affected Public: Private Sector: Notfor-profit institutions.
Estimated No. of Respondents: 187.
Estimated Annual Frequency: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
187.
Estimated Annual Responses per
Respondent: 0.167.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 31.
Reason for Change: Review of the
previously reported burden has been
adjusted to only account for burden that
falls under the PRA. Regulatory burden
has been removed. A reduction of 904
burden hours is due to this adjustment.
A total of 31 burden hours is requested.
OMB Number: 3133–0129.
Title: Corporate Credit Union, 12 CFR
part 704.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: Part 704 of NCUA’s
regulations established the regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Apr 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
framework for corporate credit unions.
This includes various reporting and
recordkeeping requirements as well as
safety and soundness standards. NCUA
has established and regulates corporate
credit unions pursuant to its authority
under sections 120, 201, and 209 of the
Federal Credit Union Act, 12 U.S.C.
1766(a), 1781, and 1789. The collection
of information is necessary to ensure
that corporate credit unions operate in
a safe and sound manner by limiting
risk to their natural person credit union
members and the National Credit Union
Share Insurance Fund.
Affected Public: Private Sector: Notfor-profit institutions.
Estimated No. of Respondents: 11.
Estimated Annual Frequency: 20.18.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
222.
Estimated Annual Responses per
Respondent: 2.40.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 534.
Reason for Change: The adjustment in
the number of respondents are due to
the decrease in the number of Corporate
Credit Unions from 12 to 11 and the
inclusion of information collection
requirements that had been omitted on
the previous submission. These
adjustments increase the total burden
request by 51 hours, for a total of 534
burden hours requested.
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record. The
public is invited to submit comments
concerning: (a) Whether the collection
of information is necessary for the
proper execution of the function of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of the
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
By Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board,
the National Credit Union Administration, on
April 4, 2019.
Dated: April 4, 2019.
Dawn D. Wolfgang,
NCUA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–06969 Filed 4–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
Sunshine Act Meeting
TIME AND DATE:
9:30 a.m., Tuesday, April
23, 2019.
NTSB Conference Center, 429
L’Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC
20594.
PLACE:
STATUS:
The one item is open to the
public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
58957 Pipeline Accident Report—
Building Explosion and Fire, Silver
Spring, Maryland, August 10, 2016
News Media Contact: Telephone:
(202) 314–6100.
The press and public may enter the
NTSB Conference Center one hour prior
to the meeting for set up and seating.
Individuals requesting specific
accommodations should contact
Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314–6305
or by email at Rochelle.McCallister@
ntsb.gov by Wednesday, April 17, 2019.
The public may view the meeting via
a live or archived webcast by accessing
a link under ‘‘News & Events’’ on the
NTSB home page at www.ntsb.gov.
Schedule updates, including weatherrelated cancellations, are also available
at www.ntsb.gov.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Candi Bing at (202) 314–6403 or by
email at bingc@ntsb.gov.
For Media Information Contact: Keith
Holloway at (202) 314–6100 or by email
at keith.holloway@ntsb.gov.
Dated: April 5, 2019.
LaSean McCray,
Assistant Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–07121 Filed 4–5–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–334 and 50–412, 50–346,
50–440; NRC–2018–0174]
FirstEnergy Corp.; FirstEnergy
Solutions; FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation, LLC; FirstEnergy Nuclear
Operating Company
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
AGENCY:
Director’s Decision under 10
CFR 2.206; issuance.
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2019 / Notices
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has issued a
director’s decision with regard to a
petition dated March 27, 2018, as
supplemented on October 8, 2018, filed
by the Environmental Law and Policy
Center (the petitioner), requesting that
the NRC take enforcement action with
regard to FirstEnergy Corp. (FE),
FirstEnergy Solutions (FES), FirstEnergy
Nuclear Generation, LLC (NG), and
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company
(FENOC) (the licensees). The
petitioner’s requests and the director’s
decision are included in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
SUMMARY:
The Director’s Decision was
issued on April 3, 2019.
DATES:
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2018–0174 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
ADDRESSES:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0174. Address
questions about NRC Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individuals listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. For the convenience of the
reader, instructions about obtaining
materials referenced in this document
are provided in the ‘‘Availability of
Documents’’ section of this document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–3308; email:
Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov and Perry
Buckberg, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–1383, email:
Perry.Buckberg@nrc.gov. Both are staff
of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
The NRC
is making the documents identified
below available to interested persons
through one or more of the following
methods, as indicated. To access
documents related to this action, see
ADDRESSES section of this document.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Document
ADAMS accession No.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER—10 CFR 2.206 Petition and Attachments 1 through 6 Citizen Complaint and Request for Enforcement Action Regarding
FirstEnergy Nuclear Facility Operations in Ohio and Pennsylvania Dated March 27,
2018.
ELPC 2.206 Petition, Motion Of The Environmental Law & Policy Center, Ohio Citizen
Action, Ohio Environmental Council and Environmental Defense Fund For Relief
From The Automatic Stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362/L.R. 4001–1.
Official Transcript of Proceedings, Meeting Between Petitioners and NRC Petition Review Board on June 19, 2018, Regarding 10 CFR 2.206 Petition OEDO–18–00160
Re: FENOC Operations in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
ELPC 2.206 Petition OEDO–18–00160 Regarding FENOC operations in Ohio and
Pennsylvania—PRB’s Initial Recommendation On The Petition Dated March 27,
2018, on FENOC Bankruptcy.
ELPC Supplement to 2.206 Petition—OEDO–18–00160, regarding Citizen Complaint
and Request for Enforcement Action Regarding FirstEnergy Nuclear Facility Operations in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Dated October 8, 2018.
OEDO–18–00160—ELPC Proposed Director’s Decision on 10 CFR 2.206 Petition for
Citizen Complaint and Request for Enforcement Action Regarding FirstEnergy Nuclear Facility Operations in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Dated January 8, 2019.
OEDO–18–00160—ELPC Comments on Proposed Director’s Decision on 10 CFR
2.206 Petition for Citizen Complaint and Request for Enforcement Action Regarding
FirstEnergy Nuclear Facility Operations in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Dated January 22,
2019.
FENOC Submission—Submittal of the Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,
and Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Dated March 15, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Apr 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
14137
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ML18094A642, ML18094A645, ML18094A647,
ML18094A649, ML18094A650, ML18094A651,
ML18094A641.
ML18151A457.
ML18194A395.
ML18214A740.
ML18282A242.
ML18309A157.
ML19037A340.
ML19074A242.
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
14138
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2019 / Notices
The text of the director’s decision is
attached.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day
of April, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III,
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
ATTACHMENT—DIRECTOR’S
DECISION DD–19–01
DD–19–01
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR
REGULATION
Ho K. Nieh, Director
[Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412, 50-346,
50-440]
[License Nos. DPR-66 and NPF-73, NPF3, NPF-58]
In the Matter of FirstEnergy Nuclear
Operating Company, Beaver Valley
Power Station, Units 1 and 2, DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1,
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1
DIRECTOR’S DECISION UNDER 10
CFR 2.206
I. Introduction
By letter dated March 27, 2018, as
supplemented on October 8, 2018
(Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS)
Accession Nos. ML18094A642 and
ML18282A242, respectively), the
Environmental Law and Policy Center
filed a petition with U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or the
Commission) pursuant to Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
2.206, ‘‘Requests for action under this
subpart.’’ The petitioner requested that
the NRC take the following actions:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
(A) Issue Demands for Information
(1) Promptly issue a Demand for
Information to FirstEnergy Corp. (FE),
FirstEnergy Solutions (FES), FirstEnergy
Nuclear Generation, LLC (NG), and
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company
(FENOC) requesting site-specific
decommissioning funding plans for
Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1
and 2 (BVPS), Davis-Besse Nuclear
Power Station, Unit 1 (DBNPS), and
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1
(PNPP).
(2) Promptly issue a Demand for
Information to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC
with regard to their reliance on external
trust funds from FE and FES to satisfy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Apr 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
their decommissioning financial
obligations.
(3) Promptly issue a Demand for
Information to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC
with regard to their continued reliance
on parent company guarantees from FE
to satisfy decommissioning funding
obligations, including the ability of FE
to satisfy the parent company guarantee
financial test under Appendix A,
‘‘Criteria Relating to Use of Financial
Tests and Parent Company Guarantees
for Providing Reasonable Assurance of
Funds for Decommissioning,’’ to 10 CFR
part 30, ‘‘Rules of General Applicability
to the Domestic Licensing of Byproduct
Material.’’
(4) Promptly issue a Demand for
Information to FES, NG, and FENOC to
the extent that they are relying on
parent company guarantees from FES to
satisfy decommissioning funding
obligations, including the ability of FES
to satisfy the parent company guarantee
financial test under 10 CFR part 30,
Appendix A.
(5) Promptly issue a Demand for
Information to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC
with regard to their proposed
investment and financial contribution
plans to make up the current
decommissioning shortfall.
(6) Promptly issue a Demand for
Information to FE and FES with regard
to each of their commitments to
guarantee coverage of NG’s and
FENOC’s decommissioning trust fund
shortfalls in the event of bankruptcy.
(B) Notice of Violation and Penalties
(1) Promptly issue a Notice of
Violation against FE, FES, NG, and
FENOC for operating nuclear facilities
without sufficient decommissioning
funds in violation of 42 U.S.C.A.
Section 2201(x)(1), and 10 CFR 50.75,
‘‘Reporting and Recordkeeping for
Decommissioning Planning.’’
(2) Promptly issue civil penalties
against FE, FES, NG, and FENOC for
operating nuclear facilities without
sufficient decommissioning funds in
violation of 42 U.S.C.A., Section
2201(x)(1), and 10 CFR 50.75.
(3) Promptly issue an order to
suspend NG’s and FENOC’s licenses for
BVPS, DBNPS, and PNPP.
(C) Other Requests
The petitioner also urges the NRC to
prohibit NG and FENOC from placing
their nuclear facilities into a safe storage
(SAFSTOR) status for purely financial
reasons. Under SAFSTOR, often
considered ‘‘deferred dismantling,’’ a
nuclear facility is maintained and
monitored in a condition that allows the
radioactivity to decay; afterwards, the
plant is dismantled and the property
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
decontaminated. The petitioner requests
that the NRC give immediate emergency
consideration to this petition in light of
FE’s and FES’s rapidly deteriorating
financial conditions.
(D) Basis for Petitioner’s Request
The following points summarize the
basis for the petitioner’s request, as
stated in the petition and the
supplement:
(1) NG’s and FENOC’s
decommissioning trust amounts are
insufficient on their own to provide
reasonable assurance of funding.
(2) FE cannot rely on rate increases
forced on retail ratepayers to pay for the
decommissioning trust fund shortfalls.
(3) The costs, including SAFSTOR,
may be much higher than expected
because of significantly higher trust
fund shortfalls, as reported by the
Callan Institute and flaws in the NRC’s
cost estimating formula.
(4) On March 28, 2018, FES and
FENOC announced and informed the
NRC by letter dated April 25, 2018
(ADAMS Accession No. ML18115A007),
that they would permanently retire all
four of their reactors within the next 3
years. If the plants close in 2020 and
2021, the funds cannot grow to levels
that will pay for the required
decommissioning.
(5) The parent companies FE and FES
filed for bankruptcy on March 31, 2018.
(6) According to the petitioner, the
transcript from a recent Federal court
proceeding provides additional
information about funding for FE’s
nuclear plant decommissioning in the
FES bankruptcy case (see Case No. 1850757, ‘‘Motion of Debtors to Approve
Settlement (dated August. 26, 2018)),
which was heard on September 25,
2018, by the Honorable Judge Alan M.
Koschik, for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Ohio.
Although the petition does not
request specific immediate action(s), it
does request ‘‘immediate emergency
consideration.’’ Based on the
information provided in the petition,
the Petition Review Board (PRB)
determined that the financial concerns
do not raise an imminent safety issue or
indicate that the licensee, FENOC, is
unable to safely operate the facilities
listed in the petition. The PRB
concluded that there is no current
public health and safety concern
requiring immediate NRC action
because financial concerns do not raise
an imminent safety issue or indicate
that FENOC is unable to safely operate
the facilities listed in the petition. The
petition manager informed the
petitioner of this conclusion by e-mail
dated May 2, 2018 (ADAMS Accession
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2019 / Notices
No. ML18123A299). The supplement,
which the petitioner submitted on
October 8, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML18282A242), did not expand the
scope of the petition or request
additional actions that should be
considered as a new petition.
Additionally, the petitioner met with
the PRB on June 19, 2018, to discuss the
petition. The transcript of this meeting
is treated as a supplement to the
petition and is publicly available online
at ADAMS Accession No.
ML18194A395. The transcript is also
available for purchase and examination
at the NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at O1F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
MD 20852. Publicly available
documents created or received at the
NRC are accessible electronically
through ADAMS at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who
do not have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents in ADAMS should contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff by telephone at 1-800397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
On August 2, 2018, the petition
manager informed the petitioner by
letter that the PRB had determined that
the petition meets the acceptance
criteria for review and that the PRB has
made an initial recommendation to
accept the petition for review (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18220B314). The
petition manager also asked whether the
petitioner desired an opportunity to
comment on this recommendation, in
person or through a teleconference,
consistent with Management Directive
8.11, ‘‘Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206
Petitions,’’ dated October 25, 2000. The
petitioner declined this offer for a
second meeting with the PRB.
On January 8, 2019, the NRC sent the
proposed director’s decision to the
petitioner and to the licensee for
comments (ADAMS Accession Nos.
ML18309A228 and ML18309A189,
respectively). The petitioner responded
with comments on the proposed
director’s decision on January 22, 2019
(ADAMS Accession No. ML19037A340).
The licensee did not submit comments
on the proposed director’s decision. The
petitioner’s comments and the staff’s
responses to the comments are included
as an attachment to this director’s
decision.
Based on the staff’s evaluation of the
petitioner’s January 22, 2019,
comments, the final director’s decision
has not changed from the proposed
director’s decision.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Apr 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
II. Discussion
FENOC Is Currently in Compliance with
NRC Regulations
The NRC has a comprehensive,
regulation-based, framework that
provides oversight of a licensee’s
decommissioning funding during
operations and decommissioning.
During operations, licensees must
biennially submit decommissioning
funding status reports by March 31. At
5 years before the projected permanent
shutdown of their reactors until license
termination, licensees must submit
annual decommissioning funding status
reports by March 31 of each year.
Additionally, at intervals not to exceed
3 years, a licensee must update and
submit its decommissioning funding
plans for its independent spent fuel
storage installations (ISFSIs) to account
for any changes in costs.
FE is the parent company of FES and
FENOC, which are wholly owned
subsidiaries. The NG owns the nuclear
plants, which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of FES. FENOC operates the
nuclear plants. FENOC and NG are the
licensees for BVPS, DBNPS, and PNPP.
FENOC submitted its most recent
decommissioning funding status reports
for BVPS, DBNPS, and PNPP in a letter
to the NRC dated March 24, 2017
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17083B221).
Based on its review of these reports, the
NRC staff concluded that FENOC met
the minimum funding requirements for
future radiological decommissioning of
its NRC-licensed facilities for the 2017
reporting cycle, and that there were no
shortfalls in decommissioning funding.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1),
FENOC is required to submit its next
decommissioning funding status reports
for BVPS, DBNPS, and PNPP to the NRC
by March 31, 2019. The reports were
submitted to the NRC on March 15,
2019 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML19074A242). The NRC staff will
conduct a similar review of these
decommissioning funding status reports
for the units, and will consider the new
expected shutdown dates, funding
levels as of December 31, 2018, and any
updated financial information necessary
to demonstrate reasonable assurance
that sufficient funds will be available for
the radiological decommissioning of the
sites. If the staff identifies a funding
shortfall, the NRC will evaluate any
such scenario on a case-by-case basis.
For an operating power reactor, the NRC
reserves the right to take additional
steps, in accordance with 10 CFR
50.75(e)(2), including reviewing the rate
of accumulation of decommissioning
funds, and to take additional actions,
either independently or in cooperation
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14139
with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission and the licensee’s State
public utility commission, as
appropriate. Additional actions may
include modifying the licensee’s
schedule for accumulating
decommissioning funds. In accordance
with 10 CFR 50.82(c), if a licensee
permanently ceases operation before the
expiration of its license, the NRC will
determine the collection period for any
shortfall of funds on a case-by-case basis
upon application by the licensee, and
will consider the specific financial
situation of each licensee. The NRR
continues to monitor FENOC’s
decommissioning financial assurance
for its reactors and ISFSIs to ensure
adequate funding and compliance with
requirements for decommissioning
funding.
Bankruptcy Proceedings
On March 31, 2018, FES, FENOC, and
NG, filed a petition for reorganization
under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code. FE has not filed for
bankruptcy. The U.S. Department of
Justice, and the NRC’s Office of the
General Counsel, are working closely
together to represent the NRC’s interests
in the bankruptcy proceeding, including
protection and preservation of the
decommissioning trust funds and
continued compliance with the
requirements for decommissioning
funding. The proceeding in the U.S.
bankruptcy court may result in changes
to FENOC’s debt structure, including
reorganization and the transfer of
control of the reactor operating licenses.
Any such license transfers would be
subject to NRC review and approval.
NRC license transfer reviews include,
among other things, a review of the
applicant’s financial qualifications,
technical qualifications, and
decommissioning funding, and would
provide for public participation and an
opportunity to request a hearing and
petition to intervene. While the
bankruptcy proceeding is in progress,
and until license termination, licensees
are required to continue to comply with
NRC regulations.
Additionally, on October 8, 2018, the
petitioner submitted the transcript from
the recent Federal court proceeding in
the FES bankruptcy case to the NRC as
a supplement to the petition (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18282A242). The NRC
staff reviewed this transcript and did
not find any information in the
supplement of which it was not
previously aware or that warranted
immediate action. The NRC will
continue to monitor the bankruptcy
proceedings and take action, as
necessary, to ensure that the licensee
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
14140
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2019 / Notices
remains in compliance with the
agency’s regulations.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
SAFSTOR
The petition ‘‘urges the NRC to
prohibit NG and FENOC from placing
their nuclear facilities into SAFSTOR
for purely financial reasons.’’ Section
3.2.2, ‘‘SAFSTOR’’ of NUREG-0586,
‘‘Final Generic Environmental Impact
Statement on Decommissioning of
Nuclear Facilities,’’ Supplement 1,
‘‘Regarding the Decommissioning of
Nuclear Power Plants,’’ Volume 1,
issued November 2002 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML023470304), lists
SAFSTOR as one of three options that
the NRC finds acceptable for a licensee
to use in decommissioning its facility.
As such, SAFSTOR is an option
currently available to FENOC.
The NRC is currently considering
changes to its decommissioning
requirements through rulemaking. The
NRC expects to publish the proposed
rule later this year in the Federal
Register. After the agency publishes the
proposed rule, members of the public
will be able to access the rule through
a link on the NRC’s public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/rulemaking-ruleforum/
active/RuleDetails.html?id=49. During
the comment period, members of the
public may submit their comments
through a link on the NRC’s Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov/docket?
D=NRC-2015-0070.
III. Conclusion
In summary, the NRC has a
comprehensive, regulation-based,
framework that provides for oversight of
a licensee’s decommissioning funding
during operation and decommissioning.
The licensees’ current decommissioning
funding status report, dated March 24,
2017, indicates that the licensees met
the minimum funding requirements for
future radiological decommissioning of
the NRC-licensed facilities for the 2017
reporting cycle, and that there were no
shortfalls in decommissioning funding.
If the NRC staff identifies a funding
shortfall in its evaluation of the status
reports, which were submitted to the
NRC on March 15, 2019, the NRC will
take appropriate action, including
enforcement action, if necessary.
Further, the NRC staff will continue to
work with the U.S. Department of
Justice to protect and preserve its
interests in FENOC’s compliance with
decommissioning requirements in the
bankruptcy proceeding. Based on the
current information available, the NRC
staff concludes that there is an
insufficient basis to find that the
licensees are out of compliance with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Apr 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
NRC’s decommissioning financial
assurance requirements. Therefore,
based on the continuing oversight and
actions described above, no further
action is necessary at this time.
As a result of the NRC staff’s
evaluation, NRR has denied the
petitioner’s requests. The request to
issue Demands for Information is denied
because the licensees are required to
provide the information requested, as
applicable, in the decommissioning
funding status reports. These
decommissioning funding status reports
were submitted to the NRC on March
15, 2019, and will undergo NRC review.
The requests to issue a Notice of
Violation and Notice of Civil Penalties
to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC, and the
request to issue an Order suspending
NG’s and FENOC’s licenses, are denied
as current information available to the
NRC does not demonstrate that the
entities are out of compliance with NRC
regulations. Therefore, there is an
insufficient basis on which to take
enforcement action, issue civil
penalties, or suspend a license.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c),
a copy of this director’s decision will be
filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for Commission review. As
provided for by this regulation, the
decision will constitute the final action
of the Commission 25 days after the date
of the decision unless the Commission,
on its own motion, institutes a review
of the decision within that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day
of April, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Ho K. Nieh,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
Attachment: Petitioner’s Comments on
Proposed Director’s Decision and NRC
Response
ATTACHMENT
PETITIONER’S COMMENTS ON
PROPOSED DIRECTOR’S DECISION
AND NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION RESPONSE
The petitioner provided comments to
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) on the proposed
director’s decision (Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No.
ML18309A157) by letter dated January
22, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML19037A340).
The petitioner’s comments do not
alter the staff’s conclusions in the
proposed director’s decision and,
therefore, do not require modification to
the final director’s decision. This
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
attachment provides the petitioner’s
comments on the proposed director’s
decision and the NRC responses to the
comments.
The petitioner’s comments are
summarized as follows:
Comment 1 (from the petitioner’s letter
dated January 22, 2019, pages 1 and 2):
The NRC staff should issue Demands
for Information to immediately request
the updated decommissioning funding
status report from FirstEnergy Corp.
(FE), FirstEnergy Solutions (FES),
FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC
(NG), and FirstEnergy Nuclear
Operating Company (FENOC).
Specifically, the NRC should order FE,
FES, FENOC and NG to provide the
most up-to-date information on
decommissioning funds with respect to:
site-specific funding plans (Request No.
1), reliance on any external funds or
parent company guarantees (Request
Nos. 2–4), proposed investment and
financial contribution plans (Request
No. 5), and commitments to guarantee
coverage of shortfalls in light of
bankruptcy (Request No. 6).
Response 1:
This comment restates the petitioner’s
original requests. As stated in the
proposed director’s decision, the next
decommissioning funding status reports
for Beaver Valley Power Station, Units
1 and 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station, Unit 1, and Perry Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit 1 are due to the NRC
by March 31, 2019, and were submitted
on March 15, 2019 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML19074A242). If the staff
identifies a funding shortfall in those
reports, the NRC will evaluate any such
scenario on a case-by-case basis. For an
operating power reactor, the NRC
reserves the right to take additional
steps, in accordance with paragraph
50.75(e)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), including
reviewing the rate of accumulation of
decommissioning funds, and to take
additional actions, either independently
or in cooperation with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission and the
licensee’s State public utility
commission, as appropriate. Additional
actions may include modifying the
licensee’s schedule for accumulating
decommissioning funds. In accordance
with 10 CFR 50.82(c), if a licensee
permanently ceases operation before the
expiration of its license, the NRC will
determine the collection period for any
shortfall of funds on a case-by-case basis
upon application by the licensee, and
will consider the specific financial
situation of each licensee. The NRC
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2019 / Notices
continues to monitor FENOC’s
decommissioning financial assurance
for its reactors and ISFSIs to ensure
adequate funding and compliance with
requirements for decommissioning
funding.
The Petition Review Board (PRB)
determined that no further actions were
needed, and the NRC made no changes
to the final director’s decision as a result
of this comment.
Comment 2 (from the petitioner’s letter
dated January 22, 2019, page 2):
The Environmental Law and Policy
Center (ELPC) requested that the NRC
postpone acting upon the proposed
director’s decision and hold open
ELPC’s petition until the NRC can
review the December 31, 2018,
decommissioning funding status
information.
Response 2:
In the proposed director’s decision,
the NRC described the existing
requirements and processes in place to
monitor the decommissioning funding
status of the licensees. If the report
demonstrates that FENOC has sufficient
funding in its trust, then no further
action is necessary. For licensees that
are no longer rate-regulated or do not
have access to a non-bypassable charge,
as is the case for FENOC and NG, any
shortfalls identified in the report must
be corrected by the time the next
decommissioning funding status reports
are due (March 31, 2020).
The PRB determined that no further
actions were needed, and the NRC made
no changes to the final director’s
decision as a result of this comment.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
Comment 3 (from the petitioner’s letter
dated January 22, 2019, pages 2 and 3):
If the NRC does not act now to ensure
that FES, FENOC, and NG reserve
adequate funds for decommissioning,
parent company FE could seek to fully
extricate itself from any
decommissioning obligations before the
NRC can identify the extent of the
funding shortfalls.
Response 3:
As stated in the proposed director’s
decision, the U.S. Department of Justice,
and the NRC’s Office of the General
Counsel, are working closely together to
represent the NRC’s interests in the
bankruptcy proceeding, including
protection and preservation of the
decommissioning trust funds and
continued compliance with
decommissioning requirements. The
proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court may result in changes to FENOC’s
debt structure, including reorganization
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Apr 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
and the transfer of control of the reactor
operating licenses. Any such license
transfers would be subject to NRC
review and approval. As such, NRC
approval of a license transfer would be
required before FE could be removed
from the current corporate structure for
purposes relating to NRC licensing. NRC
license transfer reviews include, among
other things, a review of the applicant’s
financial qualifications, technical
qualifications, and decommissioning
funding. To approve the license transfer,
the NRC must find that the applicant
has demonstrated that there is
reasonable assurance that sufficient
funds will be available for the
decommissioning process. Ultimately,
the licensee is responsible for
compliance with NRC decommissioning
financial assurance regulations, and the
NRC will continue to monitor the
remaining licensee’s continued
compliance. While the bankruptcy
proceeding is in progress, and until
license termination, licensees are
required to continue to comply with
NRC regulations.
The PRB determined that no further
actions were needed, and the NRC made
no changes to the final director’s
decision as a result of this comment.
Comment 4 (from the petitioner’s letter
dated January 22, 2019, page 3):
There is no suggestion in the
proposed Director’s Decision that the
NRC has reviewed Chapter 11 monthly
statements of financial affairs, nor that
it has assessed the status of the Chapter
11 proceedings.
Response 4:
As stated in the proposed director’s
decision, the U.S. Department of Justice
and the NRC’s Office of the General
Counsel are working closely together to
represent the NRC’s interests in the
bankruptcy proceeding, including
protection and preservation of the
decommissioning trust funds and
continued compliance with
decommissioning requirements. The
U.S. Department of Justice has reviewed
Chapter 11 monthly statements of
financial affairs, and is actively
involved in the status of the Chapter 11
proceedings.
The PRB determined that no further
actions were needed, and the NRC made
no changes to the final director’s
decision as a result of this comment.
[FR Doc. 2019–06987 Filed 4–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14141
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2019–0001]
Sunshine Act Meetings
Weeks of April 8, 15, 22,
29, May 6, 13, 2019.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
TIME AND DATE:
Week of April 8, 2019
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of April 8, 2019.
Week of April 15, 2019—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of April 15, 2019.
Week of April 22, 2019—Tentative
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
10:00 a.m. Strategic Programmatic
Overview of the Fuel Facilities and
the Nuclear Materials Users
Business Lines (Public Meeting)
(Contact: Paul Michalak: 301–415–
5804)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov/.
Week of April 29, 2019—Tentative
Tuesday, April 30, 2019
10:00 a.m. Briefing on the Annual
Threat Environment (Closed Ex. 1)
Week of May 6, 2019—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of May 6, 2019.
Week of May 13, 2019—Tentative
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
9:00 a.m. Briefing on Digital
Instrumentation and Control (Public
Meeting) (Contact: Jason Paige: 301–
415–1474)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov/.
Thursday, May 16, 2019
10:00 a.m. Briefing on Security Issues
(Closed Ex. 1)
2:00 p.m. Briefing on Security Issues
(Closed Ex. 1)
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For more information or to verify the
status of meetings, contact Denise
McGovern at 301–415–0681 or via email
at Denise.McGovern@nrc.gov. The
schedule for Commission meetings is
subject to change on short notice.
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14136-14141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06987]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412, 50-346, 50-440; NRC-2018-0174]
FirstEnergy Corp.; FirstEnergy Solutions; FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation, LLC; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Director's Decision under 10 CFR 2.206; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14137]]
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued a
director's decision with regard to a petition dated March 27, 2018, as
supplemented on October 8, 2018, filed by the Environmental Law and
Policy Center (the petitioner), requesting that the NRC take
enforcement action with regard to FirstEnergy Corp. (FE), FirstEnergy
Solutions (FES), FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC (NG), and
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) (the licensees). The
petitioner's requests and the director's decision are included in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
DATES: The Director's Decision was issued on April 3, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0174 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0174. Address
questions about NRC Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. For the convenience of the reader,
instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are
provided in the ``Availability of Documents'' section of this document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3308; email:
[email protected] and Perry Buckberg, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1383, email: [email protected].
Both are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NRC is making the documents identified
below available to interested persons through one or more of the
following methods, as indicated. To access documents related to this
action, see ADDRESSES section of this document.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS accession No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER--10 ML18094A642, ML18094A645,
CFR 2.206 Petition and Attachments 1 ML18094A647, ML18094A649,
through 6 Citizen Complaint and Request ML18094A650, ML18094A651,
for Enforcement Action Regarding ML18094A641.
FirstEnergy Nuclear Facility Operations
in Ohio and Pennsylvania Dated March 27,
2018.
ELPC 2.206 Petition, Motion Of The ML18151A457.
Environmental Law & Policy Center, Ohio
Citizen Action, Ohio Environmental
Council and Environmental Defense Fund
For Relief From The Automatic Stay, 11
U.S.C. Sec. 362/L.R. 4001-1.
Official Transcript of Proceedings, ML18194A395.
Meeting Between Petitioners and NRC
Petition Review Board on June 19, 2018,
Regarding 10 CFR 2.206 Petition OEDO-18-
00160 Re: FENOC Operations in Ohio and
Pennsylvania.
ELPC 2.206 Petition OEDO-18-00160 ML18214A740.
Regarding FENOC operations in Ohio and
Pennsylvania--PRB's Initial
Recommendation On The Petition Dated
March 27, 2018, on FENOC Bankruptcy.
ELPC Supplement to 2.206 Petition--OEDO-18- ML18282A242.
00160, regarding Citizen Complaint and
Request for Enforcement Action Regarding
FirstEnergy Nuclear Facility Operations
in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Dated October
8, 2018.
OEDO-18-00160--ELPC Proposed Director's ML18309A157.
Decision on 10 CFR 2.206 Petition for
Citizen Complaint and Request for
Enforcement Action Regarding FirstEnergy
Nuclear Facility Operations in Ohio and
Pennsylvania. Dated January 8, 2019.
OEDO-18-00160--ELPC Comments on Proposed ML19037A340.
Director's Decision on 10 CFR 2.206
Petition for Citizen Complaint and
Request for Enforcement Action Regarding
FirstEnergy Nuclear Facility Operations
in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Dated January
22, 2019.
FENOC Submission--Submittal of the ML19074A242.
Decommissioning Funding Status Reports
for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit
Nos. 1 and 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station, and Perry Nuclear Power Plant.
Dated March 15, 2019.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14138]]
The text of the director's decision is attached.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day of April, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
ATTACHMENT--DIRECTOR'S DECISION DD-19-01
DD-19-01
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
Ho K. Nieh, Director
[Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412, 50-346, 50-440]
[License Nos. DPR-66 and NPF-73, NPF-3, NPF-58]
In the Matter of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Beaver Valley
Power Station, Units 1 and 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit
1, Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1
DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2.206
I. Introduction
By letter dated March 27, 2018, as supplemented on October 8, 2018
(Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession
Nos. ML18094A642 and ML18282A242, respectively), the Environmental Law
and Policy Center filed a petition with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.206, ``Requests for action under this
subpart.'' The petitioner requested that the NRC take the following
actions:
(A) Issue Demands for Information
(1) Promptly issue a Demand for Information to FirstEnergy Corp.
(FE), FirstEnergy Solutions (FES), FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC
(NG), and FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) requesting
site-specific decommissioning funding plans for Beaver Valley Power
Station, Units 1 and 2 (BVPS), Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit
1 (DBNPS), and Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (PNPP).
(2) Promptly issue a Demand for Information to FE, FES, NG, and
FENOC with regard to their reliance on external trust funds from FE and
FES to satisfy their decommissioning financial obligations.
(3) Promptly issue a Demand for Information to FE, FES, NG, and
FENOC with regard to their continued reliance on parent company
guarantees from FE to satisfy decommissioning funding obligations,
including the ability of FE to satisfy the parent company guarantee
financial test under Appendix A, ``Criteria Relating to Use of
Financial Tests and Parent Company Guarantees for Providing Reasonable
Assurance of Funds for Decommissioning,'' to 10 CFR part 30, ``Rules of
General Applicability to the Domestic Licensing of Byproduct
Material.''
(4) Promptly issue a Demand for Information to FES, NG, and FENOC
to the extent that they are relying on parent company guarantees from
FES to satisfy decommissioning funding obligations, including the
ability of FES to satisfy the parent company guarantee financial test
under 10 CFR part 30, Appendix A.
(5) Promptly issue a Demand for Information to FE, FES, NG, and
FENOC with regard to their proposed investment and financial
contribution plans to make up the current decommissioning shortfall.
(6) Promptly issue a Demand for Information to FE and FES with
regard to each of their commitments to guarantee coverage of NG's and
FENOC's decommissioning trust fund shortfalls in the event of
bankruptcy.
(B) Notice of Violation and Penalties
(1) Promptly issue a Notice of Violation against FE, FES, NG, and
FENOC for operating nuclear facilities without sufficient
decommissioning funds in violation of 42 U.S.C.A. Section 2201(x)(1),
and 10 CFR 50.75, ``Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning
Planning.''
(2) Promptly issue civil penalties against FE, FES, NG, and FENOC
for operating nuclear facilities without sufficient decommissioning
funds in violation of 42 U.S.C.A., Section 2201(x)(1), and 10 CFR
50.75.
(3) Promptly issue an order to suspend NG's and FENOC's licenses
for BVPS, DBNPS, and PNPP.
(C) Other Requests
The petitioner also urges the NRC to prohibit NG and FENOC from
placing their nuclear facilities into a safe storage (SAFSTOR) status
for purely financial reasons. Under SAFSTOR, often considered
``deferred dismantling,'' a nuclear facility is maintained and
monitored in a condition that allows the radioactivity to decay;
afterwards, the plant is dismantled and the property decontaminated.
The petitioner requests that the NRC give immediate emergency
consideration to this petition in light of FE's and FES's rapidly
deteriorating financial conditions.
(D) Basis for Petitioner's Request
The following points summarize the basis for the petitioner's
request, as stated in the petition and the supplement:
(1) NG's and FENOC's decommissioning trust amounts are insufficient
on their own to provide reasonable assurance of funding.
(2) FE cannot rely on rate increases forced on retail ratepayers to
pay for the decommissioning trust fund shortfalls.
(3) The costs, including SAFSTOR, may be much higher than expected
because of significantly higher trust fund shortfalls, as reported by
the Callan Institute and flaws in the NRC's cost estimating formula.
(4) On March 28, 2018, FES and FENOC announced and informed the NRC
by letter dated April 25, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18115A007), that
they would permanently retire all four of their reactors within the
next 3 years. If the plants close in 2020 and 2021, the funds cannot
grow to levels that will pay for the required decommissioning.
(5) The parent companies FE and FES filed for bankruptcy on March
31, 2018.
(6) According to the petitioner, the transcript from a recent
Federal court proceeding provides additional information about funding
for FE's nuclear plant decommissioning in the FES bankruptcy case (see
Case No. 18-50757, ``Motion of Debtors to Approve Settlement (dated
August. 26, 2018)), which was heard on September 25, 2018, by the
Honorable Judge Alan M. Koschik, for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Ohio.
Although the petition does not request specific immediate
action(s), it does request ``immediate emergency consideration.'' Based
on the information provided in the petition, the Petition Review Board
(PRB) determined that the financial concerns do not raise an imminent
safety issue or indicate that the licensee, FENOC, is unable to safely
operate the facilities listed in the petition. The PRB concluded that
there is no current public health and safety concern requiring
immediate NRC action because financial concerns do not raise an
imminent safety issue or indicate that FENOC is unable to safely
operate the facilities listed in the petition. The petition manager
informed the petitioner of this conclusion by e[dash]mail dated May 2,
2018 (ADAMS Accession
[[Page 14139]]
No. ML18123A299). The supplement, which the petitioner submitted on
October 8, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18282A242), did not expand the
scope of the petition or request additional actions that should be
considered as a new petition.
Additionally, the petitioner met with the PRB on June 19, 2018, to
discuss the petition. The transcript of this meeting is treated as a
supplement to the petition and is publicly available online at ADAMS
Accession No. ML18194A395. The transcript is also available for
purchase and examination at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR),
located at O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, MD
20852. Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are
accessible electronically through ADAMS at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents in ADAMS should contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-
4209, or 301[dash]415-4737, or by e-mail to [email protected].
On August 2, 2018, the petition manager informed the petitioner by
letter that the PRB had determined that the petition meets the
acceptance criteria for review and that the PRB has made an initial
recommendation to accept the petition for review (ADAMS Accession No.
ML18220B314). The petition manager also asked whether the petitioner
desired an opportunity to comment on this recommendation, in person or
through a teleconference, consistent with Management Directive 8.11,
``Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions,'' dated October 25, 2000.
The petitioner declined this offer for a second meeting with the PRB.
On January 8, 2019, the NRC sent the proposed director's decision
to the petitioner and to the licensee for comments (ADAMS Accession
Nos. ML18309A228 and ML18309A189, respectively). The petitioner
responded with comments on the proposed director's decision on January
22, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19037A340). The licensee did not submit
comments on the proposed director's decision. The petitioner's comments
and the staff's responses to the comments are included as an attachment
to this director's decision.
Based on the staff's evaluation of the petitioner's January 22,
2019, comments, the final director's decision has not changed from the
proposed director's decision.
II. Discussion
FENOC Is Currently in Compliance with NRC Regulations
The NRC has a comprehensive, regulation-based, framework that
provides oversight of a licensee's decommissioning funding during
operations and decommissioning. During operations, licensees must
biennially submit decommissioning funding status reports by March 31.
At 5 years before the projected permanent shutdown of their reactors
until license termination, licensees must submit annual decommissioning
funding status reports by March 31 of each year. Additionally, at
intervals not to exceed 3 years, a licensee must update and submit its
decommissioning funding plans for its independent spent fuel storage
installations (ISFSIs) to account for any changes in costs.
FE is the parent company of FES and FENOC, which are wholly owned
subsidiaries. The NG owns the nuclear plants, which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of FES. FENOC operates the nuclear plants. FENOC and NG are
the licensees for BVPS, DBNPS, and PNPP. FENOC submitted its most
recent decommissioning funding status reports for BVPS, DBNPS, and PNPP
in a letter to the NRC dated March 24, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML17083B221). Based on its review of these reports, the NRC staff
concluded that FENOC met the minimum funding requirements for future
radiological decommissioning of its NRC-licensed facilities for the
2017 reporting cycle, and that there were no shortfalls in
decommissioning funding.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), FENOC is required to submit
its next decommissioning funding status reports for BVPS, DBNPS, and
PNPP to the NRC by March 31, 2019. The reports were submitted to the
NRC on March 15, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19074A242). The NRC staff
will conduct a similar review of these decommissioning funding status
reports for the units, and will consider the new expected shutdown
dates, funding levels as of December 31, 2018, and any updated
financial information necessary to demonstrate reasonable assurance
that sufficient funds will be available for the radiological
decommissioning of the sites. If the staff identifies a funding
shortfall, the NRC will evaluate any such scenario on a case-by-case
basis. For an operating power reactor, the NRC reserves the right to
take additional steps, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(e)(2), including
reviewing the rate of accumulation of decommissioning funds, and to
take additional actions, either independently or in cooperation with
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the licensee's State
public utility commission, as appropriate. Additional actions may
include modifying the licensee's schedule for accumulating
decommissioning funds. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(c), if a
licensee permanently ceases operation before the expiration of its
license, the NRC will determine the collection period for any shortfall
of funds on a case-by-case basis upon application by the licensee, and
will consider the specific financial situation of each licensee. The
NRR continues to monitor FENOC's decommissioning financial assurance
for its reactors and ISFSIs to ensure adequate funding and compliance
with requirements for decommissioning funding.
Bankruptcy Proceedings
On March 31, 2018, FES, FENOC, and NG, filed a petition for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. FE has not
filed for bankruptcy. The U.S. Department of Justice, and the NRC's
Office of the General Counsel, are working closely together to
represent the NRC's interests in the bankruptcy proceeding, including
protection and preservation of the decommissioning trust funds and
continued compliance with the requirements for decommissioning funding.
The proceeding in the U.S. bankruptcy court may result in changes to
FENOC's debt structure, including reorganization and the transfer of
control of the reactor operating licenses. Any such license transfers
would be subject to NRC review and approval. NRC license transfer
reviews include, among other things, a review of the applicant's
financial qualifications, technical qualifications, and decommissioning
funding, and would provide for public participation and an opportunity
to request a hearing and petition to intervene. While the bankruptcy
proceeding is in progress, and until license termination, licensees are
required to continue to comply with NRC regulations.
Additionally, on October 8, 2018, the petitioner submitted the
transcript from the recent Federal court proceeding in the FES
bankruptcy case to the NRC as a supplement to the petition (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18282A242). The NRC staff reviewed this transcript and
did not find any information in the supplement of which it was not
previously aware or that warranted immediate action. The NRC will
continue to monitor the bankruptcy proceedings and take action, as
necessary, to ensure that the licensee
[[Page 14140]]
remains in compliance with the agency's regulations.
SAFSTOR
The petition ``urges the NRC to prohibit NG and FENOC from placing
their nuclear facilities into SAFSTOR for purely financial reasons.''
Section 3.2.2, ``SAFSTOR'' of NUREG[dash]0586, ``Final Generic
Environmental Impact Statement on Decommissioning of Nuclear
Facilities,'' Supplement 1, ``Regarding the Decommissioning of Nuclear
Power Plants,'' Volume 1, issued November 2002 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML023470304), lists SAFSTOR as one of three options that the NRC finds
acceptable for a licensee to use in decommissioning its facility. As
such, SAFSTOR is an option currently available to FENOC.
The NRC is currently considering changes to its decommissioning
requirements through rulemaking. The NRC expects to publish the
proposed rule later this year in the Federal Register. After the agency
publishes the proposed rule, members of the public will be able to
access the rule through a link on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/rulemaking-ruleforum/active/RuleDetails.html?id=49. During the comment period, members of the
public may submit their comments through a link on the NRC's Web site
at: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=NRC-2015-0070.
III. Conclusion
In summary, the NRC has a comprehensive, regulation-based,
framework that provides for oversight of a licensee's decommissioning
funding during operation and decommissioning. The licensees' current
decommissioning funding status report, dated March 24, 2017, indicates
that the licensees met the minimum funding requirements for future
radiological decommissioning of the NRC-licensed facilities for the
2017 reporting cycle, and that there were no shortfalls in
decommissioning funding. If the NRC staff identifies a funding
shortfall in its evaluation of the status reports, which were submitted
to the NRC on March 15, 2019, the NRC will take appropriate action,
including enforcement action, if necessary. Further, the NRC staff will
continue to work with the U.S. Department of Justice to protect and
preserve its interests in FENOC's compliance with decommissioning
requirements in the bankruptcy proceeding. Based on the current
information available, the NRC staff concludes that there is an
insufficient basis to find that the licensees are out of compliance
with the NRC's decommissioning financial assurance requirements.
Therefore, based on the continuing oversight and actions described
above, no further action is necessary at this time.
As a result of the NRC staff's evaluation, NRR has denied the
petitioner's requests. The request to issue Demands for Information is
denied because the licensees are required to provide the information
requested, as applicable, in the decommissioning funding status
reports. These decommissioning funding status reports were submitted to
the NRC on March 15, 2019, and will undergo NRC review. The requests to
issue a Notice of Violation and Notice of Civil Penalties to FE, FES,
NG, and FENOC, and the request to issue an Order suspending NG's and
FENOC's licenses, are denied as current information available to the
NRC does not demonstrate that the entities are out of compliance with
NRC regulations. Therefore, there is an insufficient basis on which to
take enforcement action, issue civil penalties, or suspend a license.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c), a copy of this director's
decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for
Commission review. As provided for by this regulation, the decision
will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the
date of the decision unless the Commission, on its own motion,
institutes a review of the decision within that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day of April, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Ho K. Nieh,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Attachment: Petitioner's Comments on Proposed Director's Decision and
NRC Response
ATTACHMENT
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DIRECTOR'S DECISION AND NUCLEAR
REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE
The petitioner provided comments to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) on the proposed director's decision (Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.
ML18309A157) by letter dated January 22, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML19037A340).
The petitioner's comments do not alter the staff's conclusions in
the proposed director's decision and, therefore, do not require
modification to the final director's decision. This attachment provides
the petitioner's comments on the proposed director's decision and the
NRC responses to the comments.
The petitioner's comments are summarized as follows:
Comment 1 (from the petitioner's letter dated January 22, 2019, pages 1
and 2):
The NRC staff should issue Demands for Information to immediately
request the updated decommissioning funding status report from
FirstEnergy Corp. (FE), FirstEnergy Solutions (FES), FirstEnergy
Nuclear Generation, LLC (NG), and FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company
(FENOC). Specifically, the NRC should order FE, FES, FENOC and NG to
provide the most up-to-date information on decommissioning funds with
respect to: site-specific funding plans (Request No. 1), reliance on
any external funds or parent company guarantees (Request Nos. 2-4),
proposed investment and financial contribution plans (Request No. 5),
and commitments to guarantee coverage of shortfalls in light of
bankruptcy (Request No. 6).
Response 1:
This comment restates the petitioner's original requests. As stated
in the proposed director's decision, the next decommissioning funding
status reports for Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, Davis-
Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, and Perry Nuclear Power Plant,
Unit 1 are due to the NRC by March 31, 2019, and were submitted on
March 15, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19074A242). If the staff
identifies a funding shortfall in those reports, the NRC will evaluate
any such scenario on a case-by-case basis. For an operating power
reactor, the NRC reserves the right to take additional steps, in
accordance with paragraph 50.75(e)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), including reviewing the rate of
accumulation of decommissioning funds, and to take additional actions,
either independently or in cooperation with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission and the licensee's State public utility
commission, as appropriate. Additional actions may include modifying
the licensee's schedule for accumulating decommissioning funds. In
accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(c), if a licensee permanently ceases
operation before the expiration of its license, the NRC will determine
the collection period for any shortfall of funds on a case-by-case
basis upon application by the licensee, and will consider the specific
financial situation of each licensee. The NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation
[[Page 14141]]
continues to monitor FENOC's decommissioning financial assurance for
its reactors and ISFSIs to ensure adequate funding and compliance with
requirements for decommissioning funding.
The Petition Review Board (PRB) determined that no further actions
were needed, and the NRC made no changes to the final director's
decision as a result of this comment.
Comment 2 (from the petitioner's letter dated January 22, 2019, page
2):
The Environmental Law and Policy Center (ELPC) requested that the
NRC postpone acting upon the proposed director's decision and hold open
ELPC's petition until the NRC can review the December 31, 2018,
decommissioning funding status information.
Response 2:
In the proposed director's decision, the NRC described the existing
requirements and processes in place to monitor the decommissioning
funding status of the licensees. If the report demonstrates that FENOC
has sufficient funding in its trust, then no further action is
necessary. For licensees that are no longer rate-regulated or do not
have access to a non-bypassable charge, as is the case for FENOC and
NG, any shortfalls identified in the report must be corrected by the
time the next decommissioning funding status reports are due (March 31,
2020).
The PRB determined that no further actions were needed, and the NRC
made no changes to the final director's decision as a result of this
comment.
Comment 3 (from the petitioner's letter dated January 22, 2019, pages 2
and 3):
If the NRC does not act now to ensure that FES, FENOC, and NG
reserve adequate funds for decommissioning, parent company FE could
seek to fully extricate itself from any decommissioning obligations
before the NRC can identify the extent of the funding shortfalls.
Response 3:
As stated in the proposed director's decision, the U.S. Department
of Justice, and the NRC's Office of the General Counsel, are working
closely together to represent the NRC's interests in the bankruptcy
proceeding, including protection and preservation of the
decommissioning trust funds and continued compliance with
decommissioning requirements. The proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court may result in changes to FENOC's debt structure, including
reorganization and the transfer of control of the reactor operating
licenses. Any such license transfers would be subject to NRC review and
approval. As such, NRC approval of a license transfer would be required
before FE could be removed from the current corporate structure for
purposes relating to NRC licensing. NRC license transfer reviews
include, among other things, a review of the applicant's financial
qualifications, technical qualifications, and decommissioning funding.
To approve the license transfer, the NRC must find that the applicant
has demonstrated that there is reasonable assurance that sufficient
funds will be available for the decommissioning process. Ultimately,
the licensee is responsible for compliance with NRC decommissioning
financial assurance regulations, and the NRC will continue to monitor
the remaining licensee's continued compliance. While the bankruptcy
proceeding is in progress, and until license termination, licensees are
required to continue to comply with NRC regulations.
The PRB determined that no further actions were needed, and the NRC
made no changes to the final director's decision as a result of this
comment.
Comment 4 (from the petitioner's letter dated January 22, 2019, page
3):
There is no suggestion in the proposed Director's Decision that the
NRC has reviewed Chapter 11 monthly statements of financial affairs,
nor that it has assessed the status of the Chapter 11 proceedings.
Response 4:
As stated in the proposed director's decision, the U.S. Department
of Justice and the NRC's Office of the General Counsel are working
closely together to represent the NRC's interests in the bankruptcy
proceeding, including protection and preservation of the
decommissioning trust funds and continued compliance with
decommissioning requirements. The U.S. Department of Justice has
reviewed Chapter 11 monthly statements of financial affairs, and is
actively involved in the status of the Chapter 11 proceedings.
The PRB determined that no further actions were needed, and the NRC
made no changes to the final director's decision as a result of this
comment.
[FR Doc. 2019-06987 Filed 4-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P