Sweet Onions Grown in the Walla Walla Valley of Southeast Washington and Northeast Oregon; Amendments to Marketing Order 956, 13513-13516 [2019-06701]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
other person (except an airman serving
as an airman) not operating an aircraft
for the transportation of passengers or
property for compensation. For
violations that occurred after November
2, 2015, $13,669 per violation, up to a
total of $546,774 per civil penalty
action, in the case of any other person
(except an airman serving as an airman)
not operating an aircraft for the
transportation of passengers or property
for compensation.
(3) For violations that occurred on or
before November 2, 2015, $25,000 per
violation, up to a total of $400,000 per
civil penalty action, in the case of a
person operating an aircraft for the
transportation of passengers or property
for compensation (except an individual
serving as an airman). For violations
that occurred after November 2, 2015,
$34,174 per violation, up to a total of
$546,774 per civil penalty action, in the
case of a person (except an individual
serving as an airman) operating an
aircraft for the transportation of
passengers or property for
compensation.
John M. Mitnick,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2019–06745 Filed 4–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9–P, 9111–14–P, 9111–28–P, 9110–
04–P, 9110–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 956
[Doc. No.: AMS–SC–18–0028; SC–18–956–
1]
Sweet Onions Grown in the Walla
Walla Valley of Southeast Washington
and Northeast Oregon; Amendments
to Marketing Order 956
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends
Marketing Order No. 956, which
regulates the handling of sweet onions
grown in the Walla Walla Valley of
Southeast Washington and Northeast
Oregon. The three amendments, which
were proposed by the Walla Walla
Sweet Onion Marketing Committee
(Committee), were approved by
producers in a referendum. This action
also updates the term of office and
staggered term limits for producers and
handlers.
DATES: This rule is effective May 6,
2019.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
Specialist, or Patty Bennett, Director,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC
20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Geronimo.Quinones@usda.gov or
Patty.Bennett@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations issued to carry out
a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR
900.2(j). This rule is issued under
Marketing Order No. 956, as amended (7
CFR part 956), regulating the handling
of sweet onions grown in the Walla
Walla Valley of Southeast Washington
and Northeast Oregon. Part 956 (referred
to as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Committee, which is responsible for the
local administration of the Order, is
comprised of sweet onion producers
and handlers operating within the area
of production and a public member.
Section 608c(17) of the Act and the
applicable rules of practice and
procedure governing the formulation of
marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR
part 900) authorize amendment of the
Order through this informal rulemaking
action.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this final rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13513
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 8c(15)(A) of the Act (7 U.S.C.
608c(15)(A)), any handler subject to an
order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of
the order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with the order is not in
accordance with law and request a
modification of the order or to be
exempted therefrom. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
no later than 20 days after the date of
entry of the ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110–246)
amended section 8c(17) of the Act (7
U.S.C. 608c(17), which in turn required
the addition of supplemental rules of
practice to 7 CFR part 900 (73 FR 49307;
August 21, 2008). The amendment of
section 8c(17) of the Act and additional
supplemental rules of practice authorize
the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C.
553) to amend Federal fruit, vegetable,
and nut marketing agreements and
orders. USDA may use informal
rulemaking to amend marketing orders
based on the nature and complexity of
the proposed amendments, the potential
regulatory and economic impacts on
affected entities, and any other relevant
matters.
The USDA’s Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) considered these factors
and has determined that amending the
Order as proposed could appropriately
be accomplished through informal
rulemaking.
The proposed amendments were
unanimously recommended by the
Committee following deliberations at
two public meetings held on November
14, 2017, and March 3, 2018. A
proposed rule soliciting comments on
the amendment was issued on July 19,
2018, and published in the Federal
Register on July 24, 2018 (83 FR 34953).
One comment in support of the
amendments was received. As a result,
no changes to the proposed rule were
made. A proposed rule and referendum
order was then issued on December 11,
2018, and published in the Federal
Register on December 14, 2018 (83 FR
64296). This document directed that a
referendum among Walla Walla sweet
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
13514
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
onion producers be conducted
December 17, 2018, through December
31, 2018, to determine whether they
favored the proposals. To become
effective, the amendments had to be
approved by two-thirds of producers
voting or by those producers voting in
the referendum who represented at least
two-thirds of the volume of Walla Walla
sweet onions.
The amendments were favored by 100
percent of the producers voting and by
100 percent of the volume represented;
both exceed the two-thirds requirement.
The amendments in this final rule
change the Committee’s size, quorum,
and voting requirements. The
amendments also change the term of
office and stagger term limits for
producers and handlers.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are eight handlers of Walla
Walla sweet onions subject to regulation
under the Order and approximately 15
producers in the regulated production
area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,500,000,
and small agricultural producers are
defined as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
The Committee reported that
approximately 390,000 50-pound bags
or equivalents of Walla Walla sweet
onions were shipped into the fresh
market in 2017. Based on information
reported by USDA’s Market News
Service, the average 2017 marketing
year f.o.b. shipping point price for the
Walla Walla sweet onions was $14.90
per 50-pound equivalent. Multiplying
the $14.90 average price by the
shipment quantity of 390,000 50-pound
equivalents yields an annual crop
revenue estimate of $5,811,000. The
average annual revenue for each of the
eight handlers is therefore calculated to
be $726,375 ($5,811,000 divided by
eight), which is less than the SBA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
threshold of $7,500,000. Consequently,
all the Walla Walla sweet onion
handlers could be classified as small
entities.
In addition, based on information
provided by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS), the average
producer price for Walla Walla sweet
onions for the 2012 through 2016
marketing years is $15.27 per 50-pound
equivalent. NASS has not released data
regarding the 2017 marketing year at
this time. Multiplying the 2012–2016
marketing year average price of $15.27
by the 2017 marketing year shipments of
390,000 50-pound equivalents yields an
annual crop revenue estimate of
$5,955,300. The estimated average
annual revenue for each of the 15
producers is therefore calculated to be
approximately $397,020 ($5,955,300
divided by 15), which is less than the
SBA threshold of $750,000. In view of
the foregoing, the majority of Walla
Walla sweet onion producers and all of
the Walla Walla sweet onion handlers
may be classified as small entities.
The amendments, which were
unanimously recommended by the
Committee at two public meetings on
November 14, 2017, and March 3, 2018,
will change the Committee’s size,
quorum, and voting requirements. They
also change the term of office and
stagger term limits so that the term of
office for producers and handlers will
be two fiscal periods instead of three
fiscal periods, and one-half instead of
one-third of the producer and handler
member terms will expire every year.
These amendments will have no
direct economic effect on producers or
handlers. The number of producers and
handlers operating in the industry has
decreased, which makes it difficult to
find enough members to fill positions
on the Committee. Decreasing the
Committee’s size will make it more
reflective of today’s industry.
Therefore, it is anticipated that both
small and large producer and handler
businesses will benefit from these
amendments.
The Committee considered
alternatives to the proposals, including
making no changes at this time. Due to
changes in the industry, AMS believes
the proposals are justified and necessary
to ensure the Committee’s ability to
locally administer the program.
Reducing the size of the Committee will
enable it to fulfill membership and
quorum requirements fully, thereby
ensuring a more efficient and orderly
flow of business.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178
(Vegetable and Specialty Crops). No
changes in those requirements are
necessary as a result of this action.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizens to
access Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Committee’s meetings were
widely publicized throughout the Walla
Walla sweet onion production area. All
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and encouraged to
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. The Committee meetings
were public, and all entities, both large
and small, were encouraged to express
their views on these proposals.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on July 24, 2018 (83 FR 34953).
Copies of the proposed rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee
members and all interested parties. The
proposed rule was made available
through the internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day
comment period ending September 24,
2018, was provided to allow interested
persons to respond to the proposals.
One comment was received. The
comment submitted was in support of
the proposals; therefore, no changes
were made to the proposed
amendments.
A proposed rule and referendum
order was then issued on December 11,
2018, and published in the Federal
Register on December 14, 2018 (83 FR
64296). This document directed that a
referendum among Walla Walla sweet
onion producers be conducted
December 17, 2018, through December
31, 2018, to determine whether they
favored the proposals. To become
effective, the amendments had to be
approved by two-thirds of producers
voting or by those producers voting in
the referendum who represented at least
two-thirds of the volume of Walla Walla
sweet onions.
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
The amendments were favored by 100
percent of the producers voting and by
100 percent of the volume represented;
both exceed the two-thirds requirement.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at his previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Order Amending the Order Regulating
the Handling of Sweet Onions Grown in
the Walla Walla Valley of Southeast
Washington and Northeast Oregon 1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Findings and Determinations
(a) Findings and Determinations
Upon the Basis of the Rulemaking
Record.
The findings hereinafter set forth are
supplementary to the findings and
determinations which were previously
made in connection with the issuance of
the Order; and all said previous findings
and determinations are hereby ratified
and affirmed, except insofar as such
findings and determinations may be in
conflict with the findings and
determinations set forth herein.
1. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, and all of the
terms and conditions thereof, would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act;
2. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, regulates the
handling of sweet onions grown in the
Walla Walla Valley of Southeast
Washington and Northeast Oregon in
the same manner as, and is applicable
only to, persons in the respective classes
of commercial and industrial activity
specified in the Order;
3. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, is limited in
application to the smallest regional
production area that is practicable,
consistent with carrying out the
declared policy of the Act, and the
issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivisions of the production area
would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
4. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, prescribes,
insofar as practicable, such different
terms applicable to different parts of the
production area as are necessary to give
due recognition to the differences in the
1 This order shall not become effective unless and
until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of
practice and procedure governing proceedings to
formulate marketing agreements and marketing
orders have been met.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
production and marketing of onions
produced in the production area; and
5. All handling of onions produced in
the production area as defined in the
Order is in the current of interstate or
foreign commerce or directly burdens,
obstructs, or affects such commerce.
(b) Determinations.
It is hereby determined that:
1. Handlers (excluding cooperative
associations of producers who are not
engaged in processing, distributing, or
shipping of onions covered under the
Order) who during the period June 1,
2017, through May 31, 2018, handled
not less than 50 percent of the volume
of such onions covered by said Order,
as hereby amended, have signed an
amended marketing agreement; and
2. The issuance of this amendatory
order, further amending the aforesaid
Order, is favored or approved by at least
two-thirds of the producers who
participated in a referendum on the
question of approval and who, during
the period of June 1, 2017, through May
31, 2018, were engaged within the
production area in the production of
such onions. Such producers also
produced for market at least two-thirds
of the volume of such commodity
represented in the referendum.
3. The issuance of this amendatory
order together with a signed marketing
agreement advances the interests of
growers of onions in the production area
pursuant to the declared policy of the
Act.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of sweet onions grown in the
Walla Walla Valley of Southeast
Washington and Northeast Oregon shall
be in conformity to, and in compliance
with, the terms and conditions of the
said Order as hereby proposed to be
amended as follows:
The provisions amending the Order
contained in the proposed rule issued
by the Administrator on July 19, 2018,
and published in the Federal Register
on July 24, 2018, (83 FR 34953) will be
and are the terms and provisions of this
order amending the Order and are set
forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 956
Onions, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13515
Dated: April 2, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 956 is amended as
follows:
PART 956—SWEET ONIONS GROWN
IN THE WALLA WALLA VALLEY OF
SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON AND
NORTHEAST OREGON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 956 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Amend § 956.20 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 956.20
Establishment and membership.
(a) The Walla Walla Sweet Onion
Marketing Committee, consisting of
seven members, is hereby established.
The Committee shall consist of four
producer members, two handler
members, and one public member. Each
member shall have an alternate who
shall have the same qualifications as the
member.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 956.21 by revising to read
as follows:
§ 956.21
Term of office.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (b) of this section, the term of
office of grower and handler Committee
members and their respective alternates
shall be two fiscal periods beginning on
June 1 or such other date as
recommended by the Committee and
approved by the Secretary. The terms
shall be determined so that one-half of
the grower membership and one-half of
the handler membership shall terminate
each year. Members and alternates shall
serve during the term of office for which
they are selected and have been
qualified, or during that portion thereof
beginning on the date on which they
qualify during such term of office and
continuing until the end thereof, or
until their successors are selected and
have qualified.
(b) The term of office of the initial
members and alternates shall begin as
soon as possible after May 6, 2019. Onehalf of the initial industry grower and
handler members and alternates shall
serve for a one-year term and one-half
shall serve for a two-year term. The
initial as well as all successive terms of
office of the public member and
alternate member shall be for three
years.
(c) The consecutive terms of office for
all members shall be limited to two two-
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
13516
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Honduras exports to the United States
will be subject to re-inspection at ports
of entry by FSIS inspectors. At this time,
Honduras is unable to ship raw poultry
product to the United States because it
is not recognized by APHIS as being free
of Newcastle Disease (ND).
year terms. There shall be no such
limitation for alternate members.
■ 4. Amend § 956.28 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 956.28
Procedure.
(a) Four members of the Committee
shall constitute a quorum, and four
concurring votes shall be required to
pass any motion or approve any
Committee action, except that
recommendations made pursuant to
§ 956.61 shall require five concurring
votes.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–06701 Filed 4–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 381
[Docket No. FSIS–2017–0026]
RIN 0583–AD58
Eligibility of Honduras To Export
Poultry Products to the United States
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending
the Federal poultry products inspection
regulations to add Honduras to the list
of countries eligible to export poultry
products to the United States. The FSIS
review of Honduras’ laws, regulations,
and inspection system demonstrated
that its poultry slaughter inspection
system is equivalent to the system FSIS
has established under the Poultry
Products Inspection Act (PPIA) and its
implementing regulations.
DATES: Effective May 6, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roberta Wagner, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Policy and
Program Development; Telephone: (202)
720–0089.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under this
final rule, Honduras will be permitted to
export to the United States only raw
poultry products, such as whole
carcasses produced in certified
Honduran establishments, because FSIS
only assessed Honduras’ poultry
slaughter inspection system. Honduras
would need to request an equivalence
determination and submit additional
information records for FSIS to review
before FSIS would allow Honduras to
export heat-treated poultry products,
such as cooked or canned product, to
the United States. All products that
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:57 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
Background
On April 13, 2016, FSIS published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(81 FR 21758) to add Honduras to the
list of countries eligible to export
poultry products to the United States (9
CFR 381.196(b)). This final rule is
consistent with the proposed rule.
As explained in the proposed rule,
section 17 of the PPIA (21 U.S.C. 466)
prohibits importation into the United
States of slaughtered poultry, or parts or
products thereof, of any kind unless
they are healthful, wholesome, fit for
human food, not adulterated, and
contain no dye, chemical, preservative,
or ingredient that renders them
unhealthful, unwholesome, adulterated,
or unfit for human food. Under the PPIA
and the regulations that implement it,
poultry products imported into the
United States must be produced under
standards for safety, wholesomeness,
and labeling accuracy that are
equivalent to those of the United States.
Under the regulations at 9 CFR 381.196,
FSIS sets out the procedures by which
foreign countries may become eligible to
export poultry and poultry products to
the United States.
Section 381.196(a) requires a foreign
country’s poultry inspection system to
include standards equivalent to those of
the United States and to provide legal
authority for the inspection system and
its implementing regulations that is
equivalent to that of the United States.
Specifically, a country’s legal authority
and regulations must impose
requirements equivalent to those of the
United States with respect to: (1) Antemortem and post-mortem inspection by,
or under the direct supervision of, a
veterinarian, or other employees or
licensees of the system under the direct
supervision of veterinarians; (2) official
controls by the national government
over establishment construction,
facilities, and equipment; (3) direct and
continuous official supervision of
slaughtering of poultry and processing
of poultry products by inspectors to
ensure that product is not adulterated or
misbranded; (4) complete separation of
establishments certified to export from
those not certified; (5) maintenance of a
single standard of inspection and
sanitation throughout certified
establishments; (6) requirements for
sanitation and for sanitary handling of
product at establishments certified to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
export; (7) official controls over
condemned product; (8) a Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point
(HACCP) system; and (9) any other
requirements found in the PPIA and its
implementing regulations (9 CFR
381.196(a)(2)(ii)).
The country’s inspection system must
also impose requirements equivalent to
those of the United States with respect
to: (1) Organizational structure and
staffing, so as to ensure uniform
enforcement of the requisite laws and
regulations in all certified
establishments; (2) ultimate control and
supervision by the national government
over the official activities of employees
or licensees; (3) qualified inspectors; (4)
enforcement and certification authority;
(5) administrative and technical
support; (6) inspection, sanitation,
quality, species verification, and residue
standards; and (7) any other inspection
requirements (9 CFR 381.196(a)(2)(i)).
Evaluation of the Honduran Poultry
Inspection System
In 2003, the government of Honduras
requested approval to export poultry
products to the United States. Honduras
stated that if approved, its immediate
intent was to export raw poultry
carcasses to the United States. FSIS then
began to evaluate the Honduras poultry
slaughter inspection system to
determine whether it is equivalent to
that of the United States.
FSIS conducted a document review to
evaluate the laws, regulations, and other
documentation used by Honduras to
execute its poultry inspection system.
FSIS examined the information
submitted by Honduras to verify that the
following equivalence components were
addressed satisfactorily with respect to
standards, activities, resources, and
enforcement: (1) Government Oversight;
(2) Statutory Authority and Food Safety
Regulations; (3) Sanitation; (4) Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point
Systems; (5) Chemical Residue Testing
Programs; and (6) Microbiological
Testing Programs. The document review
was satisfactory to FSIS, and FSIS
scheduled an on-site review to evaluate
all aspects of the Honduran poultry
inspection program.
In November 2005, FSIS conducted an
on-site audit of the Honduran poultry
inspection program and identified
systemic deficiencies within three
equivalence components: Government
Oversight, Sanitation, and HACCP. In
response to this audit, Honduras
submitted a corrective action plan that
addressed FSIS’s findings.
In June 2009, FSIS conducted a
second on-site audit to verify whether
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13513-13516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06701]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 956
[Doc. No.: AMS-SC-18-0028; SC-18-956-1]
Sweet Onions Grown in the Walla Walla Valley of Southeast
Washington and Northeast Oregon; Amendments to Marketing Order 956
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends Marketing Order No. 956, which
regulates the handling of sweet onions grown in the Walla Walla Valley
of Southeast Washington and Northeast Oregon. The three amendments,
which were proposed by the Walla Walla Sweet Onion Marketing Committee
(Committee), were approved by producers in a referendum. This action
also updates the term of office and staggered term limits for producers
and handlers.
DATES: This rule is effective May 6, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
Specialist, or Patty Bennett, Director, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in
7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 956, as
amended (7 CFR part 956), regulating the handling of sweet onions grown
in the Walla Walla Valley of Southeast Washington and Northeast Oregon.
Part 956 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee, which is
responsible for the local administration of the Order, is comprised of
sweet onion producers and handlers operating within the area of
production and a public member. Section 608c(17) of the Act and the
applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of
marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR part 900) authorize amendment of
the Order through this informal rulemaking action.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this final rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled
``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 8c(15)(A) of the
Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(15)(A)), any handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in
accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be
exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling
on the petition, provided an action is filed no later than 20 days
after the date of entry of the ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110-246) amended section 8c(17) of the Act (7
U.S.C. 608c(17), which in turn required the addition of supplemental
rules of practice to 7 CFR part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21, 2008). The
amendment of section 8c(17) of the Act and additional supplemental
rules of practice authorize the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C.
553) to amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements
and orders. USDA may use informal rulemaking to amend marketing orders
based on the nature and complexity of the proposed amendments, the
potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities, and any
other relevant matters.
The USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) considered these
factors and has determined that amending the Order as proposed could
appropriately be accomplished through informal rulemaking.
The proposed amendments were unanimously recommended by the
Committee following deliberations at two public meetings held on
November 14, 2017, and March 3, 2018. A proposed rule soliciting
comments on the amendment was issued on July 19, 2018, and published in
the Federal Register on July 24, 2018 (83 FR 34953). One comment in
support of the amendments was received. As a result, no changes to the
proposed rule were made. A proposed rule and referendum order was then
issued on December 11, 2018, and published in the Federal Register on
December 14, 2018 (83 FR 64296). This document directed that a
referendum among Walla Walla sweet
[[Page 13514]]
onion producers be conducted December 17, 2018, through December 31,
2018, to determine whether they favored the proposals. To become
effective, the amendments had to be approved by two-thirds of producers
voting or by those producers voting in the referendum who represented
at least two-thirds of the volume of Walla Walla sweet onions.
The amendments were favored by 100 percent of the producers voting
and by 100 percent of the volume represented; both exceed the two-
thirds requirement.
The amendments in this final rule change the Committee's size,
quorum, and voting requirements. The amendments also change the term of
office and stagger term limits for producers and handlers.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are eight handlers of Walla Walla sweet onions subject to
regulation under the Order and approximately 15 producers in the
regulated production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined
by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual
receipts of less than $7,500,000, and small agricultural producers are
defined as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR
121.201).
The Committee reported that approximately 390,000 50-pound bags or
equivalents of Walla Walla sweet onions were shipped into the fresh
market in 2017. Based on information reported by USDA's Market News
Service, the average 2017 marketing year f.o.b. shipping point price
for the Walla Walla sweet onions was $14.90 per 50-pound equivalent.
Multiplying the $14.90 average price by the shipment quantity of
390,000 50-pound equivalents yields an annual crop revenue estimate of
$5,811,000. The average annual revenue for each of the eight handlers
is therefore calculated to be $726,375 ($5,811,000 divided by eight),
which is less than the SBA threshold of $7,500,000. Consequently, all
the Walla Walla sweet onion handlers could be classified as small
entities.
In addition, based on information provided by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the average producer price for
Walla Walla sweet onions for the 2012 through 2016 marketing years is
$15.27 per 50-pound equivalent. NASS has not released data regarding
the 2017 marketing year at this time. Multiplying the 2012-2016
marketing year average price of $15.27 by the 2017 marketing year
shipments of 390,000 50-pound equivalents yields an annual crop revenue
estimate of $5,955,300. The estimated average annual revenue for each
of the 15 producers is therefore calculated to be approximately
$397,020 ($5,955,300 divided by 15), which is less than the SBA
threshold of $750,000. In view of the foregoing, the majority of Walla
Walla sweet onion producers and all of the Walla Walla sweet onion
handlers may be classified as small entities.
The amendments, which were unanimously recommended by the Committee
at two public meetings on November 14, 2017, and March 3, 2018, will
change the Committee's size, quorum, and voting requirements. They also
change the term of office and stagger term limits so that the term of
office for producers and handlers will be two fiscal periods instead of
three fiscal periods, and one-half instead of one-third of the producer
and handler member terms will expire every year.
These amendments will have no direct economic effect on producers
or handlers. The number of producers and handlers operating in the
industry has decreased, which makes it difficult to find enough members
to fill positions on the Committee. Decreasing the Committee's size
will make it more reflective of today's industry.
Therefore, it is anticipated that both small and large producer and
handler businesses will benefit from these amendments.
The Committee considered alternatives to the proposals, including
making no changes at this time. Due to changes in the industry, AMS
believes the proposals are justified and necessary to ensure the
Committee's ability to locally administer the program. Reducing the
size of the Committee will enable it to fulfill membership and quorum
requirements fully, thereby ensuring a more efficient and orderly flow
of business.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Vegetable
and Specialty Crops). No changes in those requirements are necessary as
a result of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they
would be submitted to OMB for approval.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizens to access Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
The Committee's meetings were widely publicized throughout the
Walla Walla sweet onion production area. All interested persons were
invited to attend the meetings and encouraged to participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues. The Committee meetings were
public, and all entities, both large and small, were encouraged to
express their views on these proposals.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on July 24, 2018 (83 FR 34953). Copies of the proposed rule
were mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and all
interested parties. The proposed rule was made available through the
internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day
comment period ending September 24, 2018, was provided to allow
interested persons to respond to the proposals. One comment was
received. The comment submitted was in support of the proposals;
therefore, no changes were made to the proposed amendments.
A proposed rule and referendum order was then issued on December
11, 2018, and published in the Federal Register on December 14, 2018
(83 FR 64296). This document directed that a referendum among Walla
Walla sweet onion producers be conducted December 17, 2018, through
December 31, 2018, to determine whether they favored the proposals. To
become effective, the amendments had to be approved by two-thirds of
producers voting or by those producers voting in the referendum who
represented at least two-thirds of the volume of Walla Walla sweet
onions.
[[Page 13515]]
The amendments were favored by 100 percent of the producers voting
and by 100 percent of the volume represented; both exceed the two-
thirds requirement.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at his
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Sweet Onions Grown
in the Walla Walla Valley of Southeast Washington and Northeast Oregon
1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the
requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Findings and Determinations
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Rulemaking
Record.
The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the
findings and determinations which were previously made in connection
with the issuance of the Order; and all said previous findings and
determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such
findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and
determinations set forth herein.
1. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, and all of
the terms and conditions thereof, would tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act;
2. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, regulates
the handling of sweet onions grown in the Walla Walla Valley of
Southeast Washington and Northeast Oregon in the same manner as, and is
applicable only to, persons in the respective classes of commercial and
industrial activity specified in the Order;
3. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, is limited
in application to the smallest regional production area that is
practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the
Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to subdivisions of
the production area would not effectively carry out the declared policy
of the Act;
4. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended,
prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to
different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due
recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of
onions produced in the production area; and
5. All handling of onions produced in the production area as
defined in the Order is in the current of interstate or foreign
commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce.
(b) Determinations.
It is hereby determined that:
1. Handlers (excluding cooperative associations of producers who
are not engaged in processing, distributing, or shipping of onions
covered under the Order) who during the period June 1, 2017, through
May 31, 2018, handled not less than 50 percent of the volume of such
onions covered by said Order, as hereby amended, have signed an amended
marketing agreement; and
2. The issuance of this amendatory order, further amending the
aforesaid Order, is favored or approved by at least two-thirds of the
producers who participated in a referendum on the question of approval
and who, during the period of June 1, 2017, through May 31, 2018, were
engaged within the production area in the production of such onions.
Such producers also produced for market at least two-thirds of the
volume of such commodity represented in the referendum.
3. The issuance of this amendatory order together with a signed
marketing agreement advances the interests of growers of onions in the
production area pursuant to the declared policy of the Act.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of sweet onions grown in the Walla Walla Valley of
Southeast Washington and Northeast Oregon shall be in conformity to,
and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the said Order as
hereby proposed to be amended as follows:
The provisions amending the Order contained in the proposed rule
issued by the Administrator on July 19, 2018, and published in the
Federal Register on July 24, 2018, (83 FR 34953) will be and are the
terms and provisions of this order amending the Order and are set forth
in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 956
Onions, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: April 2, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 956 is
amended as follows:
PART 956--SWEET ONIONS GROWN IN THE WALLA WALLA VALLEY OF SOUTHEAST
WASHINGTON AND NORTHEAST OREGON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 956 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Amend Sec. 956.20 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 956.20 Establishment and membership.
(a) The Walla Walla Sweet Onion Marketing Committee, consisting of
seven members, is hereby established. The Committee shall consist of
four producer members, two handler members, and one public member. Each
member shall have an alternate who shall have the same qualifications
as the member.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 956.21 by revising to read as follows:
Sec. 956.21 Term of office.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section,
the term of office of grower and handler Committee members and their
respective alternates shall be two fiscal periods beginning on June 1
or such other date as recommended by the Committee and approved by the
Secretary. The terms shall be determined so that one-half of the grower
membership and one-half of the handler membership shall terminate each
year. Members and alternates shall serve during the term of office for
which they are selected and have been qualified, or during that portion
thereof beginning on the date on which they qualify during such term of
office and continuing until the end thereof, or until their successors
are selected and have qualified.
(b) The term of office of the initial members and alternates shall
begin as soon as possible after May 6, 2019. One-half of the initial
industry grower and handler members and alternates shall serve for a
one-year term and one-half shall serve for a two-year term. The initial
as well as all successive terms of office of the public member and
alternate member shall be for three years.
(c) The consecutive terms of office for all members shall be
limited to two two-
[[Page 13516]]
year terms. There shall be no such limitation for alternate members.
0
4. Amend Sec. 956.28 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 956.28 Procedure.
(a) Four members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and
four concurring votes shall be required to pass any motion or approve
any Committee action, except that recommendations made pursuant to
Sec. 956.61 shall require five concurring votes.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-06701 Filed 4-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P