Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy: The Food and Drug Administration's Application of Statutory Factors in Determining When a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Is Necessary; Guidance for Industry; Availability, 13668-13669 [2019-06663]
Download as PDF
13668
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2019 / Notices
appointing members to the CAC, the
Board will consider a number of factors,
including diversity in terms of subject
matter expertise, geographic
representation, and the representation of
women and minority groups.
CAC members must be willing and
able to make the necessary time
commitment to participate in
organizational conference calls and
prepare for and attend meetings two
times per year (usually for two days).
The meetings will be held at the Board’s
offices in Washington, DC. The Board
will provide a nominal honorarium and
will reimburse CAC members only for
their actual travel expenses subject to
Board policy.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, acting through the
Director of the Division of Consumer and
Community Affairs under delegated
authority, March 26, 2019.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2019–06406 Filed 4–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–D–2730]
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation
Strategy: The Food and Drug
Administration’s Application of
Statutory Factors in Determining When
a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation
Strategy Is Necessary; Guidance for
Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a final
guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Risk
Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy:
FDA’s Application of Statutory Factors
in Determining When a Risk Evaluation
and Mitigation Strategy Is Necessary.’’
This guidance is intended to clarify how
FDA applies the factors set forth in the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act) in determining whether a
risk evaluation and mitigation strategy
(REMS) is necessary to ensure that the
benefits of a drug outweigh its risks.
This guidance is one of several
developed to fulfill performance goals
that FDA agreed to satisfy in the
reauthorization of the prescription drug
user fee program (the Prescription Drug
User Fee Act (PDUFA) V). This
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:46 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
guidance finalizes the draft guidance
entitled ‘‘FDA’s Application of Statutory
Factors in Determining When a REMS Is
Necessary,’’ issued September 21, 2016.
DATES: The announcement of the
guidance is published in the Federal
Register on April 5, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either
electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as
follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–2730 for ‘‘REMS: FDA’s
Application of Statutory Factors in
Determining When a REMS Is
Necessary.’’ Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any
guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single
copies of this guidance to the Division
of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002; or to the Office of
Communication, Outreach and
Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2019 / Notices
assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Bunting, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6366,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
1292, Jason.Bunting@fda.hhs.gov; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7911, Stephen.Ripley@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry entitled ‘‘REMS:
FDA’s Application of Statutory Factors
in Determining When a REMS Is
Necessary.’’ The Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA) (Pub. L. 110–85) created
section 505–1 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355–1),1 which authorizes FDA
to require a REMS for certain drugs if
FDA determines that a REMS is
necessary to ensure that the benefits of
the drug outweigh its risks (see section
505–1(a) of the FD&C Act). FDA can
require a REMS before initial approval
of a new drug application or, should
FDA become aware of ‘‘new safety
information’’ (as defined in section 505–
1(b)(3) of the FD&C Act) about a drug
and determine that a REMS is necessary
to ensure that the benefits of the drug
outweigh its risks, after the drug has
been approved (see section 505–1(a)(2)
of the FD&C Act).
FDA’s determination as to whether a
REMS is necessary for a particular drug
is a complex, drug specific inquiry,
reflecting an analysis of multiple,
interrelated factors. Section 505–1(a) of
the FD&C Act, as added by FDAAA,
requires FDA to consider the following
six factors 2 in making a decision about
whether to require a REMS:
1 Section 505–1 of the FD&C Act applies to
applications for prescription drugs submitted or
approved under subsections 505(b) (i.e., new drug
applications) or (j) (i.e., abbreviated new drug
applications) (21 U.S.C. 355(b) or (j)) of the FD&C
Act and to applications submitted or licensed under
section 351 (i.e., biologics license applications) of
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262). In
this document, unless otherwise specified, the term
‘‘drug’’ refers to drug and biological products (or
biologics).
2 Section 505–1(a)(1) of the FD&C Act requires
the Agency to consider these factors in determining
whether a REMS is necessary for a new drug. FDA
also generally considers these factors in
determining whether (based on new safety
information), a REMS is necessary for a drug that
is the subject of an approved application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:46 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
• The seriousness of any known or
potential adverse events that may be
related to the drug and the background
incidence of such events in the
population likely to use the drug;
• The expected benefit of the drug
with respect to the disease or condition;
• The seriousness of the disease or
condition that is to be treated with the
drug;
• Whether the drug is a new
molecular entity;
• The expected or actual duration of
treatment with the drug; and
• The estimated size of the
population likely to use the drug.
These six factors influence FDA’s
decisions with respect to whether a
REMS is required for a particular drug
and what type of REMS might be
necessary (i.e., what specific elements
or tools should be included as part of
the REMS). FDA makes decisions about
requiring a REMS as part of a benefitrisk determination for a drug after an
evaluation that includes integrated
consideration of each of the statutory
factors. All six factors are considered
together to inform FDA’s REMS decision
making process and no single factor is
determinative as to whether a REMS is
necessary. The relative importance or
weight of each factor is a case specific
inquiry. This guidance describes how
FDA considers each of these factors in
conducting its REMS analysis.
This guidance finalizes the draft
guidance entitled ‘‘FDA’s Application of
Statutory Factors in Determining When
a REMS Is Necessary,’’ issued
September 21, 2016 (81 FR 64911).
Interested persons were invited to
comment by November 21, 2016. FDA
received comments related to how we
weigh the six factors when determining
if a REMS is necessary, minor clarifying
comments on how we apply the six
factors, and comments suggesting that
FDA expand on which REMS elements
or tools should be used when it is
determined that a REMS is necessary.
FDA has considered all of the public
comments received in finalizing this
guidance. Clarifying edits were made to
address the comments as appropriate.
Additionally, edits were made to
streamline the guidance, extraneous
background information was removed,
and the title was modified for clarity.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on ‘‘REMS: FDA’s
Application of Statutory Factors in
Determining When a REMS Is
Necessary.’’ It does not establish any
rights for any person and is not binding
on FDA or the public. You can use an
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13669
alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations. This guidance is not
subject to Executive Order 12866.
II. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet
may obtain the guidance at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm, https://
www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
Information/Guidances/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: April 1, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–06663 Filed 4–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2011–P–0047, FDA–
2012–P–0468, FDA–2015–P–3400, and FDA–
2016–P–1667]
Determination That ANTIVERT
Chewable Tablets, 25 Milligrams, and
Tablets, 12.5 Milligrams, 25 Milligrams,
and 50 Milligrams, Were Not
Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of
Safety or Effectiveness
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) has
determined that ANTIVERT (meclizine
hydrochloride) chewable tablets, 25
milligrams (mg), and tablets, 12.5 mg, 25
mg, and 50 mg, were not withdrawn
from sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness. This determination means
that FDA will not begin procedures to
withdraw approval of abbreviated new
drug applications (ANDAs) that refer to
these drug products, and it will allow
FDA to continue to approve ANDAs that
refer to the products as long as they
meet relevant legal and regulatory
requirements.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Jong, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6288, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–3977.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1984,
Congress enacted the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417)
(the 1984 amendments), which
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13668-13669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06663]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2016-D-2730]
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy: The Food and Drug
Administration's Application of Statutory Factors in Determining When a
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Is Necessary; Guidance for
Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a final guidance for industry entitled ``Risk
Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy: FDA's Application of Statutory
Factors in Determining When a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy
Is Necessary.'' This guidance is intended to clarify how FDA applies
the factors set forth in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) in determining whether a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy
(REMS) is necessary to ensure that the benefits of a drug outweigh its
risks. This guidance is one of several developed to fulfill performance
goals that FDA agreed to satisfy in the reauthorization of the
prescription drug user fee program (the Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) V). This guidance finalizes the draft guidance entitled ``FDA's
Application of Statutory Factors in Determining When a REMS Is
Necessary,'' issued September 21, 2016.
DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on April 5, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-D-2730 for ``REMS: FDA's Application of Statutory Factors in
Determining When a REMS Is Necessary.'' Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale
Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; or to the Office of
Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
[[Page 13669]]
assist that office in processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Bunting, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6366, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
1292, [email protected]; or Stephen Ripley, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``REMS: FDA's Application of Statutory Factors in Determining
When a REMS Is Necessary.'' The Food and Drug Administration Amendments
Act of 2007 (FDAAA) (Pub. L. 110-85) created section 505-1 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 355-1),\1\ which authorizes FDA to require a REMS for
certain drugs if FDA determines that a REMS is necessary to ensure that
the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks (see section 505-1(a) of
the FD&C Act). FDA can require a REMS before initial approval of a new
drug application or, should FDA become aware of ``new safety
information'' (as defined in section 505-1(b)(3) of the FD&C Act) about
a drug and determine that a REMS is necessary to ensure that the
benefits of the drug outweigh its risks, after the drug has been
approved (see section 505-1(a)(2) of the FD&C Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 505-1 of the FD&C Act applies to applications for
prescription drugs submitted or approved under subsections 505(b)
(i.e., new drug applications) or (j) (i.e., abbreviated new drug
applications) (21 U.S.C. 355(b) or (j)) of the FD&C Act and to
applications submitted or licensed under section 351 (i.e.,
biologics license applications) of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262). In this document, unless otherwise specified, the term
``drug'' refers to drug and biological products (or biologics).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA's determination as to whether a REMS is necessary for a
particular drug is a complex, drug specific inquiry, reflecting an
analysis of multiple, interrelated factors. Section 505-1(a) of the
FD&C Act, as added by FDAAA, requires FDA to consider the following six
factors \2\ in making a decision about whether to require a REMS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Section 505-1(a)(1) of the FD&C Act requires the Agency to
consider these factors in determining whether a REMS is necessary
for a new drug. FDA also generally considers these factors in
determining whether (based on new safety information), a REMS is
necessary for a drug that is the subject of an approved application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The seriousness of any known or potential adverse events
that may be related to the drug and the background incidence of such
events in the population likely to use the drug;
The expected benefit of the drug with respect to the
disease or condition;
The seriousness of the disease or condition that is to be
treated with the drug;
Whether the drug is a new molecular entity;
The expected or actual duration of treatment with the
drug; and
The estimated size of the population likely to use the
drug.
These six factors influence FDA's decisions with respect to whether
a REMS is required for a particular drug and what type of REMS might be
necessary (i.e., what specific elements or tools should be included as
part of the REMS). FDA makes decisions about requiring a REMS as part
of a benefit-risk determination for a drug after an evaluation that
includes integrated consideration of each of the statutory factors. All
six factors are considered together to inform FDA's REMS decision
making process and no single factor is determinative as to whether a
REMS is necessary. The relative importance or weight of each factor is
a case specific inquiry. This guidance describes how FDA considers each
of these factors in conducting its REMS analysis.
This guidance finalizes the draft guidance entitled ``FDA's
Application of Statutory Factors in Determining When a REMS Is
Necessary,'' issued September 21, 2016 (81 FR 64911). Interested
persons were invited to comment by November 21, 2016. FDA received
comments related to how we weigh the six factors when determining if a
REMS is necessary, minor clarifying comments on how we apply the six
factors, and comments suggesting that FDA expand on which REMS elements
or tools should be used when it is determined that a REMS is necessary.
FDA has considered all of the public comments received in finalizing
this guidance. Clarifying edits were made to address the comments as
appropriate. Additionally, edits were made to streamline the guidance,
extraneous background information was removed, and the title was
modified for clarity.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``REMS: FDA's Application of Statutory
Factors in Determining When a REMS Is Necessary.'' It does not
establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. This guidance
is not subject to Executive Order 12866.
II. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: April 1, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-06663 Filed 4-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P