Announcement of Hearing Regarding Proposed Waiver and Regulations Governing the Taking of Marine Mammals, 13639-13643 [2019-06336]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13639-13643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[Docket No. 181019964-9283-01]
RIN 0648-XG584


Announcement of Hearing Regarding Proposed Waiver and Regulations 
Governing the Taking of Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an agency hearing to be convened by the 
National Marine Fisheries Service before an administrative law judge 
(ALJ) and the process by which interested persons can participate in 
the hearing. The hearing involves a proposed waiver under the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and proposed regulations governing the 
hunting of eastern North Pacific (ENP) gray whales by the Makah Indian 
Tribe in northwest Washington State. A proposed rule relating to the 
proposed waiver and regulations is published elsewhere in today's issue 
of the Federal Register.

DATES: NMFS has scheduled a hearing before Administrative Law Judge 
George J. Jordan to consider the proposed MMPA waiver and the proposed 
regulations. It will begin on August 12, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. PDT in the 
Henry M. Jackson Federal Building, 915 Second Ave., 4th Floor 
Auditorium, Seattle, WA 98174. A pre-hearing conference is scheduled on 
June 17, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. PDT in the Henry M. Jackson Federal 
Building, 915 Second Ave., Seattle, WA 98174 (room location to be set 
by the ALJ). Persons interested in participating as a party in the 
hearing should consult regulations at 50 CFR part 228 and this notice 
and notify NMFS by the filing deadline below.
    Filing deadlines: Any person desiring to participate as a party at 
the hearing must notify the NMFS West Coast Region Regional 
Administrator, by certified mail, postmarked on or before May 6, 2019. 
Any person desiring to participate as a party must submit initial 
written direct testimony by May 20, 2019, as specified below. All 
notices, testimony, and other filings must include the following 
Hearing Docket Number assigned to this matter: 19-NMFS-0001. Interested 
persons should consult the remainder of this notice and the procedural 
regulations at 50 CFR part 228 for additional deadlines, hearing 
procedures, and other opportunities for participation in the process.

ADDRESSES: Any person desiring to participate as a party in the hearing 
must notify NMFS, by certified mail, at the following address: Mr. 
Barry Thom, Regional Administrator, NMFS, West Coast Region, 1201 NE 
Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232.
    Any person desiring to participate as a party in the hearing should 
also send an electronic copy to [email protected].
    All documents pertaining to the hearing, including initial direct 
testimony, shall be filed with the ALJ. All documents should, to the 
extent

[[Page 13640]]

possible, be formatted in a way that makes them accessible to 
individuals with disabilities or otherwise compliant with the Section 
508 Amendment of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794d. More 
information on creating accessible documents may be found at https://www.section508.gov/create. Parties are encouraged to submit direct 
testimony and other documents via email to the ALJ at 
[email protected] (noting the Hearing Docket Number assigned to this 
matter: 19-NMFS-0001). If the size of the attachment exceeds email 
capacity, parties are then encouraged to mail a CD-ROM with the 
document included to the ALJ (at the address listed below). If a party 
is unable to file electronic documents, parties shall file paper 
hardcopies of the documents with the ALJ (at the address listed below). 
Only a single copy of any filing is required, whether filed 
electronically or hardcopy. The mailing address for any CD-ROM or paper 
hardcopy is: ALJ Docketing Center, U.S. Custom House, Attn: Hearing 
Docket Clerk, 40 S Gay Street, Room 412, Baltimore, MD 21202.
    All filings associated with the hearing become part of the record, 
which will be available for public viewing and inspection at the ALJ's 
hearing website: https://www.uscg.mil/Resources/Administrative-Law-Judges/Decisions/ALJ-Decisions-2016/NOAA-Formal-Rulemaking-Makah-Tribe/. These filings will include the initial direct testimony of NMFS 
in support of the proposed regulations and waiver and, upon issuance, 
the ALJ's preliminary determination of the issues of fact that may be 
addressed at the hearing. Information pertaining to this hearing is 
also available at the NMFS West Coast Region website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/formal-rulemaking-proposed-mmpa-waiver-and-hunt-regulations-governing-gray-whale-hunts-makah.
    NMFS prepared a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) (80 FR 
13373; March 13, 2015) for the proposed waiver and regulations. The 
DEIS and comments thereon may be accessed at the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal https://www.regulations.gov via the following Docket 
Identification: NOAA-NMFS-2012-0104. The DEIS and comments, along with 
any communications falling under 50 CFR 228.10(b) (ex parte 
communications), also are available for viewing at the address for the 
Regional Administrator listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Milstein, NMFS West Coast 
Region, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232-1274; 503-
231-6268.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 14, 2005, NMFS received a 
request from the Makah Indian Tribe for a waiver of the MMPA moratorium 
on the take of marine mammals to allow for take of ENP gray whales 
(Eschrichtius robustus). The Tribe requested that NMFS authorize a 
tribal hunt for ENP gray whales in the coastal portion of the Tribe's 
usual and accustomed fishing area for ceremonial and subsistence 
purposes and the making and sale of handicrafts. The MMPA imposes a 
general moratorium on the taking of marine mammals but authorizes the 
Secretary of Commerce to waive the moratorium and issue regulations 
governing the take if certain statutory criteria are met. After full 
evaluation of the Tribe's request, NMFS is proposing to authorize a 
limited tribal hunt for ENP gray whales and the making and sale of 
handicrafts. Additional information regarding the Tribe's request and 
NMFS' proposed waiver and regulations is provided in the associated 
proposed rule published elsewhere in today's issue of the Federal 
Register.
    Under the MMPA, a decision to waive the take moratorium and issue 
regulations governing the take must be made on the record after an 
opportunity for an agency hearing on the proposed waiver and 
regulations (16 U.S.C. 1373(d)). The hearing is governed by agency 
regulations at 50 CFR part 228, which call for the appointment of a 
presiding officer and prescribe other procedures. At the conclusion of 
the hearing process, the presiding officer will make a recommended 
decision based on the hearing record and transmit the decision and 
record to the NOAA Assistant Administrator for Fisheries.
    Pursuant to the regulations, this notice of hearing shall include 
the following information:
    1. The nature of the hearing. The subject of the hearing is NMFS' 
proposal to issue a waiver and regulations under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 
1371(a)(3)(A) and 1373) regarding the take of ENP gray whales and the 
making and sale of handicrafts by the Makah Indian Tribe. NMFS' 
proposed waiver and regulations are published elsewhere in today's 
Federal Register. The hearing is governed by the requirements of the 
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553, 555-557) and agency 
regulations at 50 CFR part 228. In particular, interested persons 
should be aware of the restrictions on communications that apply to the 
hearing process set forth in 5 U.S.C. 557(d)(1) and 50 CFR 228.10. 
These and additional restrictions on communications are described in a 
NOAA memorandum entitled ``Restrictions on Communications Pertaining to 
Makah Indian Tribe's Request for Waiver of Moratorium on Take of 
Eastern North Pacific Gray Whales,'' available on the NMFS West Coast 
Region website (see ADDRESSES).
    2. The place and date of the hearing. See DATES above.
    3. The legal authority under which the hearing is to be held. 16 
U.S.C. 1371(a)(3)(A) and 1373; 50 CFR part 228.
    4. The proposed regulations and waiver and a summary of the 
statements required by 16 U.S.C. 1373(d). This information is provided 
in the proposed rule, published elsewhere in today's issue of the 
Federal Register.
    5. Issues of fact that may be involved in the hearing. See below.
    6. The date of publication of a draft environmental impact 
statement associated with the proposed waiver and regulations and the 
place where the draft and comments thereon may be viewed and copied 
(see ADDRESSES).
    7. Any written advice received from the Marine Mammal Commission. A 
summary of the recommendations provided by the Marine Mammal Commission 
on the proposed waiver and regulations is provided in the proposed rule 
published elsewhere in today's Federal Register. Complete copies of the 
Commission's written advice are available on the NMFS West Coast Region 
website (see ADDRESSES).
    8. The place where records and submitted direct testimony will be 
kept for public inspection. All filings and submitted direct testimony 
forming the record for this hearing will be available at ALJ's hearing 
website (see ADDRESSES). Documents pertaining to this hearing are 
available for public inspection at the address for the Regional 
Administrator (see ADDRESSES). Persons interested in reviewing these 
documents may contact the Regional Administrator (see ADDRESSES) to 
schedule a time to inspect them.
    9. The final date for filing notice of intent to participate in the 
hearing. See filing deadlines under the DATES section above.
    10. The final date for submission of direct testimony on the 
proposed regulations and waiver and the number of copies required. 
Direct testimony should be submitted as specified under ADDRESSES by 
the date specified under filing deadlines (see DATES).
    11. The docket number assigned to the case. 19-NMFS-0001.

[[Page 13641]]

    12. The date and place of the pre-hearing conference. See DATES 
above.

Issues of Fact That May Be Involved in the Hearing

    Based on the best available scientific evidence related to the 
applicable MMPA criteria, NMFS has determined that the following facts 
support issuance of the proposed waiver and regulations, described in 
the proposed rule published elsewhere in today's issue of the Federal 
Register.

I. Waiver

    A. NMFS gave due regard to the potential effects of the proposed 
waiver on the distribution, abundance, breeding habits, and times and 
lines of migratory movements of the ENP gray whale stock.
    1. The proposed waiver will not have a meaningful effect on the 
distribution, abundance, breeding habits, or migratory movements of the 
ENP gray whale stock.
    2. NMFS recognizes two stocks of gray whales under the MMPA, the 
western North Pacific (WNP) stock and the eastern North Pacific (ENP) 
stock.
    3. Under the MMPA, NMFS defines the Pacific Coast Feeding Group 
(PCFG) as gray whales observed between June 1 and November 30 within 
the region between northern California and northern Vancouver Island 
(from 41[deg] N lat. to 52[deg] N lat.) and photo-identified within 
this area during two or more years. The PCFG is part of the ENP stock.
    4. The ENP stock ranges from the winter/spring breeding grounds in 
northern Mexico and southern California to the summer/fall feeding 
grounds in the Bering, Beaufort, and Chukchi seas. The ENP stock 
migrates between the breeding and feeding grounds between December and 
May. The PCFG spends the summer and fall feeding season off the Pacific 
coast of North America from northern California to northern Vancouver 
Island.
    5. The best available abundance estimate for the ENP stock is 
26,960.
    6. The best available abundance estimate for the PCFG is 243.
    7. The proposed waiver, at a maximum, would result in the deaths of 
25 whales over 10 years, or an average of 2.5 per year. The proposed 
waiver, at a maximum, would reduce the ENP gray whale stock by 0.09 
percent over 10 years, or an average of 0.009 percent per year.
    8. Reducing the ENP stock by 0.009 percent per year or 0.09 percent 
over 10 years would not have a discernable effect on the ENP stock's 
abundance.
    9. The United States is a signatory to the International Convention 
for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW). The ICRW establishes the 
International Whaling Commission (IWC), which, among other things, 
establishes catch limits for aboriginal subsistence whaling by member 
states.
    10. Since 1997, the IWC has routinely approved an aboriginal 
subsistence catch limit for ENP gray whales for joint use by the United 
States and the Russian Federation. The United States and the Russian 
Federation have been routinely, and currently are, parties to a 
bilateral agreement that allocates the IWC catch limit between the two 
countries and allows either country to transfer to the other any unused 
allocation.
    11. The United States has routinely transferred its unused share of 
the IWC catch limit to the Russian Federation for use by Chukotkan 
hunters.
    12. Based on long-standing practice and the current United States-
Russian Federation bilateral agreement, the United States would likely 
continue to transfer any unused IWC catch limit to the Russian 
Federation for use by Chukotkan natives, so that the net effect of the 
hunt on ENP gray whale abundance would be the same with or without the 
proposed waiver.
    13. The proposed waiver, at a maximum, would result in a total of 
150 unsuccessful strike attempts and training harpoon throws, combined, 
over 10 years, or an average of 15 per year.
    14. The proposed waiver, at a maximum, would result in a total of 
353 approaches (causing a hunt or training vessel to be within 100 
yards of a gray whale) per year, with a sub-limit of 142 approaches of 
PCFG whales.
    15. The ENP stock has demonstrated resiliency to decades of active 
hunting by Chukotkan natives and other human activities. Gray whales 
were classified as an endangered species under U.S. law in 1970 (the 
original listing included both ENP and WNP gray whales). Subsequently, 
the ENP stock recovered and was de-listed in 1994. The ENP stock grew 
from 12,771 animals to approximately 27,000 animals between 1970 and 
2016.
    16. Despite over a hundred gray whales being pursued and killed in 
aboriginal subsistence hunts off Chukotka each year, many of which are 
killed during the summer feeding months, there has not been a 
discernible change in the availability or location of gray whales in 
the Chukotkan hunt area.
    17. Unsuccessful strike attempts and training harpoon throws are 
expected to result in temporary disturbance but not to have a lasting 
effect on the affected whale's health or behaviors.
    18. Approaches are not expected to have a lasting effect on the 
affected whale's health or behaviors.
    19. Photo-identification is a reliable, feasible method of 
identifying PCFG and WNP whales.
    20. The proposed waiver, at a maximum, would result in 16 strikes 
of PCFG whales over the 10-year duration of the waiver period (average 
of 1.6 per year), of which only 8 strikes would be of PCFG females 
(average of 0.8 per year).
    21. Under the proposed waiver, NMFS would manage impacts of the 
proposed waiver to PCFG whales through photo-identification and 
specified assumptions.
    22. The proposed waiver would require that hunting cease if PCFG 
abundance were to fall below set levels. The levels, referred to as 
low-abundance triggers, are 192 whales, or a minimum abundance estimate 
of 171 whales.
    23. NMFS would use a forecasting model to provide up-to-date PCFG 
abundance estimates during the waiver period.
    24. PCFG abundance has been stable or increasing since around 2002, 
with an average annual increase in abundance of 3.5 animals between 
2002 and 2015.
    25. The combination of strike limits and low-abundance triggers 
will ensure that the proposed waiver will not cause PCFG abundance to 
decline below recent stable levels.
    26. Because the proposed waiver will not cause PCFG abundance to 
decline below recent stable levels, the proposed waiver is not expected 
to affect the range-wide distribution of the ENP stock, including the 
stock's distribution within the PCFG range.
    27. Under the proposed waiver, hunting or hunt training is most 
likely to overlap with gray whale breeding in December-January. NMFS 
expects that few if any hunt activities would occur in December-January 
due to inclement weather and unfavorable ocean conditions, but it is 
possible that hunt activities could occur in December-January and could 
encounter mating whales.
    28. The proposed waiver would not adversely affect ENP gray whale 
breeding, because the proportion of the migration corridor where hunt 
activities could occur is small, the level of hunt activity likely to 
occur in December-January is low, the number of whales that could be 
struck is extremely small, and any whales that were disturbed would 
likely have repeated

[[Page 13642]]

opportunities to mate throughout the remainder of the southward 
migration.
    29. Migrating ENP gray whales are only expected to be encountered 
during even-year hunts. Migrating whales are steady swimmers that would 
transit the hunt area within several hours. The hunt area is a very 
small portion of the ENP gray whale stock's migration corridor.
    30. During even-year hunts, adverse weather and ocean conditions 
coupled with shorter periods of daylight would keep most hunts and 
training exercises close to shore and of short duration.
    31. A very small number of migrating ENP gray whales would be 
subjected to hunt or training activities. Any gray whale subject to 
such activities (but not struck) would likely experience the encounter 
as a temporary and localized near-shore event that would not result in 
a lasting effect on the whale's migratory movements.
    B. NMFS properly concluded that the proposed waiver is in accord 
with the MMPA's purposes and policies because it will not affect the 
health, stability, or functioning of the marine ecosystem or the ENP 
stock's abundance relative to its optimum sustainable population (OSP) 
levels.
    1. The proposed waiver is not expected to have a meaningful effect 
on the health, stability, or functioning of the marine ecosystem or on 
the ENP stock's abundance relative to OSP.
    2. The level of hunting that could occur under the proposed waiver 
would affect only a small fraction of the ENP stock and the stock's 
ecosystems. Most effects of the hunt would be temporary and localized.
    3. The ENP stock functions within many large ecosystems shaped by a 
variety of processes. The smallest recognized ecosystem that 
encompasses the hunt area is the northern California Current ecosystem.
    4. The northern California Current ecosystem is shaped by dynamic, 
highly energetic, large-scale processes, including currents, upwelling, 
freshwater runoff, seasonal wind/storm patterns, and variable climate 
patterns such as El Ni[ntilde]o. The role of ENP gray whales in 
structuring this ecosystem is limited.
    5. The number of removals of gray whales that could occur under the 
proposed waiver is too small to have a discernable effect on the 
northern California Current ecosystem.
    6. Even at the smallest biologically relevant scale, the northern 
Washington coastal environment, the level of hunting that could occur 
under the proposed waiver would not have a perceptible effect on the 
health or stability of the marine ecosystem or the functioning of the 
ENP stock within the ecosystem.
    7. The ENP stock has been within OSP levels since at least 1995. In 
2012, NMFS concluded that the ENP stock was at 85 percent of carrying 
capacity with an 88 percent likelihood that the stock was above its 
maximum net productivity level. NMFS's current stock assessment report 
for the ENP stock continues to adopt this conclusion.
    8. The removal of up to 25 whales from the ENP stock over 10 years, 
or 2.5 whales average per year, is not expected to affect the ENP 
stock's abundance relative to its OSP levels.

II. Regulations

    A. The proposed regulations are necessary and appropriate to ensure 
that a tribal hunt will not disadvantage the ENP gray whale stock, 
because the proposed regulations will have no discernable effect on the 
ENP gray whale stock's abundance relative to OSP. See Issues of Fact 
I.A.7-8, I.B.7-8.
    B. The proposed regulations are necessary and appropriate to ensure 
that a tribal hunt will be consistent with the purposes and policies of 
the MMPA. See Issues of Fact I.B.1-8.
    C. NMFS gave full consideration to all relevant factors in 
prescribing the proposed regulations, including existing and future 
levels of marine mammals stocks, existing international treaty and 
agreement obligations of the United States, the marine ecosystem and 
related environmental considerations, the conservation, development, 
and utilization of fishery resources, the economic and technological 
feasibility of implementation, and potential effects to the WNP stock.
    1. NMFS fully considered the effects of the proposed regulations on 
the existing and future levels of the ENP gray whale stock. See Issues 
of Fact I.A.7-8, I.B.7-8.
    2. NMFS fully considered the effects of the proposed regulations on 
existing international treaty and agreement obligations of the United 
States.
    3. Under the ICRW and through the bilateral agreement between the 
United States and the Russian Federation, the Makah Tribe can harvest 
up to five ENP gray whales per year.
    4. The proposed regulations would not authorize the Tribe to 
harvest more ENP gray whales than available under the ICRW and the 
U.S.-Russian Federation bilateral agreement.
    5. The IWC Scientific Committee's Standing Work Group on Aboriginal 
Subsistence Whaling Management Procedures evaluated a Makah tribal hunt 
as would be carried out under the proposed regulations and determined 
that the hunt would meet the IWC conservation objectives for ENP, WNP, 
and PCFG whales.
    6. NMFS fully considered the effects of the proposed regulations on 
the marine ecosystem. See Issues of Fact II.A.2.a-f. See Issues of Fact 
I.B.1-6.
    7. NMFS fully considered the effects of the proposed regulations on 
environmental considerations related to the marine ecosystem, including 
potential effects to water quality, pelagic and benthic habitats, other 
species of fish and wildlife, and marine noise levels.
    8. The proposed regulations would have no effect on the 
conservation, development, or utilization of fishery resources.
    9. NMFS fully considered the economic and technological feasibility 
of implementation of the proposed regulations.
    10. NMFS's costs associated with the proposed regulations would 
primarily involve the continuation of longstanding gray whale surveys 
and photo-identification work, with additional funding of approximately 
$2,000 per day of hunting needed to support NMFS monitoring and 
enforcement personnel. The annual NMFS budget for marine mammal 
management in the West Coast Region is over $700,000.
    11. The costs to NMFS associated with regulating a hunt under the 
proposed regulations are feasible.
    12. The Tribe's 1999 gray whale hunt successfully demonstrated the 
economic and technological feasibility of the Tribe prosecuting a gray 
whale hunt. The Tribe has enacted a detailed Tribal Whaling Ordinance, 
which demonstrates the feasibility of tribal hunt management.
    13. The proposed regulations include provisions for matching 
photographs of struck whales to those of known whales, a procedure 
which is technologically feasible.
    14. The proposed regulations include provisions for marking and 
tracking handicrafts made from non-edible whale products, which is 
technologically feasible.
    15. NMFS determined that potential risks to WNP gray whales from 
implementation of the proposed regulations is an additional relevant 
factor in prescribing the regulations and fully considered such risks.
    16. The proposed regulations contain a number of restrictions to 
limit the risk of death, injury, or other harm to WNP whales. These 
include alternating hunt

[[Page 13643]]

seasons, a limit of three strikes during even-year hunts, a ban on 
hunting during November and June, seasonal restriction on training 
harpoon throws in odd-numbered years, restriction on multiple strikes 
within 24 hours during even-year hunts, and the requirement that if a 
WNP is confirmed to be struck, the hunt will cease until steps are 
taken to ensure such an event will not recur.
    17. NMFS's scientists undertook a risk analysis to quantify risk to 
WNP whales based on the best scientific evidence available and using 
conservative assumptions.
    18. NMFS's risk analysis concludes that there is a 5.8 percent 
probability of hunters striking one WNP gray whale over the 10 years of 
the regulations, meaning over the course of seventeen 10-year hunt 
periods, one WNP gray whale would be expected to be struck (i.e., in 
one year out of 170), if the Tribe made the maximum number of strikes 
attempts allowed in even-year hunts and if ENP and WNP population sizes 
and migration patterns remained constant.
    19. NMFS's risk analysis concludes that there is about a 30 percent 
probability that one WNP whale would be subjected to an unsuccessful 
strike attempt or training harpoon throw over the 10 years of the 
regulations, or one such encounter every 33 years, if the Tribe made 
the maximum number of strike attempts allowed in even-year hunts and if 
ENP and WNP population sizes and migration patterns remained constant.
    20. Unsuccessful strike attempts and training harpoon throws are 
expected to result in temporary disturbance but not to have a lasting 
effect on the affected whale's health or behaviors.
    21. NMFS's risk analysis concludes that a maximum of 14 WNP gray 
whales could be approached within 100 yards over the ten years of the 
waiver period, or an average of 1.4 per year, if ENP and WNP population 
sizes and migration patterns remain constant. This analysis assumes 
that all allowed approaches (3,530 over 10 years) are made and all 
occur between December 1 and May 31, meaning that no hunting would 
occur during odd-year hunts.
    22. Approximately twice as many suitable days for hunting and 
training occur during the months of odd-year hunt seasons than during 
the months of even-year hunt seasons, considering weather conditions 
and whale availability.
    23. If the Tribe made the full number of approaches allowed under 
the proposed regulations each year of the waiver period, and those 
approaches were divided evenly between odd-year and even-year hunts, 
then approximately 0.7 WNP whales would be subjected to an approach 
annually.
    24. Approaches are not expected to have a lasting effect on the 
whale's health or behaviors.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(3)(A) and 1373; 50 CFR part 228.

    Dated: March 27, 2019.
Barry A. Thom,
Regional Administrator, West Coast Region, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-06336 Filed 4-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P