Chapter 4 Regulations Relating to Verification and Certification Requirements for Certain Entities and Reporting by Foreign Financial Institutions, 13121 [C1-2019-05527]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 65 / Thursday, April 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
eliminating federal preemption; 82 (7)
requiring companies that provide access
to transmission lines connecting users
to the internet to filter out and report
spam to regulatory authorities; 83 (8)
providing email recipients a private
right of action to enforce CAN–SPAM
Act violations; 84 and (9) permitting
class-action lawsuits.85
The first suggestion is unfeasible,
because the Act expressly prohibits the
Commission from designating ‘‘any
specific words, characters, marks, or
labels’’ to satisfy the requirement that
initiators identify a commercial
electronic mail message as an
advertisement or solicitation.86 The
second suggestion also conflicts with
the plain language of certain definitions
under both the Act and Rule. As the
Commission has previously stated, ‘‘a
list owner must honor opt-out requests
only if it qualifies as the ‘sender’ of a
commercial email (i.e., it is an initiator
and its ‘product, service, or internet
website’ are ‘advertised or promoted’ in
the email).’’ 87 The Commission also
declines to consider the remaining
proposed modifications because each
would be inconsistent with the
Commission’s circumscribed authority
under the Act.
6. Comments Regarding Law
Enforcement Priorities and Policies
A number of comments made
proposals better understood as
recommendations for how the
Commission should implement
enforcement priorities and policies
rather than modifications to the Rule.
These proposals included: (1) Allowing
consumers to report and/or forward
spam to the FTC; 88 (2) sending violators
a link to CAN–SPAM regulations and
guidance documents; 89 (3) including
willful violators of CAN–SPAM on a
‘‘blacklist’’ for circulation among email
service providers; 90 (4) working with
payment processors and other
intermediaries to shutter accounts
belonging to spammers; 91 and (5)
providing guidance to states regarding
82 Bristol
(42); St. Peters (64); Ford (99).
(78).
84 Balsam (31) (‘‘enable the spam recipients to file
lawsuits, not just the AG, FTC, and ISPs’’); Wippler
(63) (expressly recommending modification of the
CAN–SPAM Act); Walton (73) (‘‘the rules should
allow for recipients of spam to enforce opt-out
requests’’); cf. 15 U.S.C. 7706.
85 Barth (66); cf. 15 U.S.C. 7706.
86 15 U.S.C. 7711(b).
87 79 FR at 29660.
88 Pesterfield (30); Francis (67).
89 Pesterfield (30).
90 Id.
91 Ford (99).
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
83 Davis
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Apr 03, 2019
Jkt 247001
the scope of preemption under the
Act.92
The Commission has already adopted
the first recommendation, and continues
to encourage consumers to report illegal
spam to ftccomplaintassistant.gov or
forward it directly to spam@uce.gov.
Such complaints from consumers help
the Commission to detect patterns of
fraud and abuse, and identify potential
investigative targets. The Commission
also appreciates the recommendations
provided by the remaining comments,
and will take such information into
consideration as it continues to
formulate enforcement priorities that
would benefit consumers and secure
industrywide compliance with the
CAN–SPAM Rule.
IV. Conclusion
The comments overwhelmingly: (1)
Favor retention of the Rule and assert
that there is a continuing need for the
Rule; (2) conclude that the Rule benefits
consumers; (3) assert that the Rule does
not impose substantial economic
burdens; and (4) conclude that the
benefits outweigh the minimal costs the
Rule imposes. The Commission has
analyzed the proposed benefits to
consumers of proposed changes to the
Rule, including any evidence provided
of those benefits, and balanced those
proposed benefits against the cost of
implementing the changes, the need for
the change, and alternative means of
providing these benefits for consumers,
such as consumer education materials.
Despite some comments recommending
that the Commission adopt
modifications to the Rule, there is
insufficient evidence in the record to
demonstrate that such modifications are
necessary and would, in fact, help
consumers. Additionally, none of the
comments proposing modifications or
clarifications that could potentially
burden industry sufficiently analyzed
the associated costs.
The FTC plans to review and consider
revising its consumer and business
education materials to address the
concerns raised in the comments
submitted pursuant to this Rule Review
to ensure that consumers and businesses
more easily understand the Rule’s
protections and requirements.
Furthermore, the Commission has a
variety of enforcement tools available to
help consumers better understand the
Rule’s protections and ensure
compliance. If, at a later date, the
Commission concludes that the Rule,
case law interpreting the Rule, and the
FTC’s other enforcement tools do not
provide adequate guidance and
protection for consumers in the
marketplace, it can then consider, based
on a further record, whether and how to
amend the Rule. Accordingly, the
Commission has determined to retain
the current Rule and is terminating this
review.
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–06562 Filed 4–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9852]
RIN 1545–BL96
Chapter 4 Regulations Relating to
Verification and Certification
Requirements for Certain Entities and
Reporting by Foreign Financial
Institutions
Correction
In rule document 2019–05527
appearing on pages 10976–10989 in the
issue of March 25, 2019, make the
following corrections:
§ 1.1471–4
[Corrected]
1. On page 10981, in the third column,
in paragraph (j), in the 6th and 10th
lines ‘‘March 26, 2019’’ should read
‘‘March 25, 2019’’.
■
§ 1.1471–5
[Corrected]
2. On page 10987, in the first column,
in paragraph (m), in the 6th and 11th
lines ‘‘March 26, 2019’’ should read
‘‘March 25, 2019’’.
■
§ 1.1472–1
[Corrected]
3. On page 10989, in the third column,
in paragraph (h), in the 5th and 9th lines
‘‘March 26, 2019’’ should read ‘‘March
25, 2019’’.
■
[FR Doc. C1–2019–05527 Filed 4–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
92 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
13121
E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM
04APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2019-05527]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9852]
RIN 1545-BL96
Chapter 4 Regulations Relating to Verification and Certification
Requirements for Certain Entities and Reporting by Foreign Financial
Institutions
Correction
In rule document 2019-05527 appearing on pages 10976-10989 in the
issue of March 25, 2019, make the following corrections:
Sec. 1.1471-4 [Corrected]
0
1. On page 10981, in the third column, in paragraph (j), in the 6th and
10th lines ``March 26, 2019'' should read ``March 25, 2019''.
Sec. 1.1471-5 [Corrected]
0
2. On page 10987, in the first column, in paragraph (m), in the 6th and
11th lines ``March 26, 2019'' should read ``March 25, 2019''.
Sec. 1.1472-1 [Corrected]
0
3. On page 10989, in the third column, in paragraph (h), in the 5th and
9th lines ``March 26, 2019'' should read ``March 25, 2019''.
[FR Doc. C1-2019-05527 Filed 4-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301-00-D