Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Glazing Materials, 13222-13223 [2019-06518]
Download as PDF
13222
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 65 / Thursday, April 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
First Century Communications and
Video Accessibility Act of 2010, Public
Law 111–260, 47 U.S.C. 615c, that this
Fourth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, is hereby adopted.
69. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Fourth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 20
Communications common carriers,
Communications equipment, Radio.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 20 as follows:
PART 20—COMMERCIAL MOBILE
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 20
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152(a) 154(i),
157, 160, 201, 214, 222, 251(e), 301, 302, 303,
303(b), 303(r), 307, 307(a), 309, 309(j)(3), 316,
316(a), 332, 610, 615, 615a, 615b, 615c,
unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 20.18 is amended by
revising paragraph (i)(2)(ii)(C)
introductory text and paragraph
(i)(2)(ii)(D) to read as follows:
■
911 Service.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) By April 3, 2021: In each of the
top 25 CMAs, nationwide CMRS
providers shall deploy either
dispatchable location, or z-axis
technology in compliance with the
following z-axis accuracy metric: Within
3 meters above or below (plus or minus
3 meters) the handset for 80% of
wireless E911 calls.
*
*
*
*
*
(D) By April 3, 2023: In each of the
top 50 CMAs, nationwide CMRS
providers shall deploy either
dispatchable location, or z-axis
technology in compliance with the
following z-axis accuracy metric: Within
3 meters above or below (plus or minus
3 meters) the handset for 80% of
wireless E911 calls.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–06012 Filed 4–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Apr 03, 2019
Jkt 247001
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2019–0024]
RIN 2127–AL03
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Glazing Materials
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
NHTSA withdraws its June
21, 2012 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM), which proposed revising
Federal motor vehicle safety standard
(FMVSS) No. 205, ‘‘Glazing materials,’’
to harmonize it with Global Technical
Regulation (GTR) No. 6, ‘‘Safety Glazing
Materials for Motor Vehicles and Motor
Vehicle Equipment.’’ Based on the
results of the agency’s review of
available information and analysis of
the technically substantive comments
on the proposal, NHTSA is unable to
conclude at this time that harmonizing
FMVSS No. 205 with GTR No. 6 would
increase safety.
DATES: As of April 4, 2019, the proposed
amendments to 49 CFR part 571 that
were contained in the notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published
June 21, 2012 (77 FR 37477) are
withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Myers, Office of Crashworthiness
Standards (Phone 202–366–1810; FAX:
202–366–2739) or Callie Roach, Office
of the Chief Counsel (Phone: 202–366–
2992; FAX: 202–366–3820).
You may send mail to these officials
at: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackon,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the
Secretary.
§ 20.18
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
I. Background
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 205, ‘‘Glazing
materials,’’ (49 CFR 571.205), specifies
performance requirements for the types
of glazing that may be installed in motor
vehicles. It also specifies the vehicle
locations in which the various types of
glazing may be installed. The purpose of
FMVSS No. 205 is to reduce injuries
(e.g., lacerations) resulting from impact
to glazing surfaces, to ensure a
necessary degree of transparency in
motor vehicle windows for driver
visibility, and to minimize the
possibility of occupants being thrown
through the vehicle windows in
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
collisions. FMVSS No. 205 applies to
passenger cars, multipurpose passenger
vehicles, trucks, buses, motorcycles,
slide-in campers, pickup covers
designed to carry persons while in
motion and low speed vehicles, and to
glazing materials for use in those
vehicles.
GTR No. 6, ‘‘Safety Glazing Materials
for Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle
Equipment,’’ was adopted under the
United Nations/Economic Commission
for Europe (UN/ECE) 1998 Agreement,
which is administered by World Forum
for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation
(WP.29). At the one-hundred-and-thirtysecond session of the WP.29 in March
2004, the formal proposal to develop a
GTR on safety glazing was adopted, and
at that time restricted the scope of the
glazing GTR to glass safety glazing,
thereby excluding other materials, such
as plastics. The objective of GTR No. 6
is to develop an internationally
harmonized standard regarding the
safety of glass automotive glazing
materials. GTR No. 6 includes
requirements and tests to ensure that the
mechanical properties, optical qualities
and environmental resistance of glazing
are satisfactory; it does not include type
approval, plastic glazing and
installation requirements.
II. NPRM
On June 21, 2012, NHTSA published
a NPRM 1 as part of the agency’s
ongoing effort to harmonize vehicle
safety standards under the UN/ECE
1998 agreement when, and to the extent,
appropriate to do so. The agency stated
in the NPRM that harmonization with
GTR No. 6 would modernize the test
procedures for tempered glass,
laminated glass, and glass-plastic
glazing used in front windshields and
rear and side windows. The GTR
proposed an upgraded fragmentation
test for testing the tempering of curved
tempered glass, and a new procedure for
testing an optical property of the
windshield at the angle of installation,
to more accurately reflect real world
driving conditions than the current
procedure used in Standard No. 205.
The agency said further that most of the
proposals were minor amendments that
would harmonize differing
measurements and performance
requirements for similar test procedures.
Many of the tests in the GTR were said
to be substantially similar to tests
currently included in FMVSS No. 205.
III. Comments Received
In the NPRM, the agency requested
public comment on whether the
1 77
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
FR 37478.
04APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 65 / Thursday, April 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
proposed amendments reflecting
provisions of the GTR are suitable for
being adopted into the Federal glazing
standard. NHTSA received comments
from 14 entities in response to the
NPRM to adopt GTR provisions in
FMVSS No. 205.2 These comments
came from trade associations, glazing
manufacturers, automobile
manufacturers, a glazing industry
expert, and a safety technology
company. Overall, most of the
comments supported the harmonization
efforts, though several suggested
revisions or requested clarification. A
few commenters were opposed to
certain aspects of the proposed
harmonization of glazing standards,
with one respondent completely
opposing the NPRM. NHTSA also
received comments for definitions,
markings, and cost.
IV. Decision to Withdraw Rulemaking
Crash data indicates that current
glazing materials are performing
acceptably. Since the 1960s, the
magnitude of the safety problem for
glazing has been substantially reduced.3
The increased availability of automatic
occupant protection systems has
resulted in a substantial reduction in the
numbers of occupants impacting the
windshield and thus being exposed to
lacerative injuries from broken glass.
The current glazing standard ensures
that emerging and evolving glazing
technologies produce commensurate
benefits and that glazing remains a
safety concern rather than becoming a
safety problem.
According to agency crash data,
occupant ejection, particularly during
rollover events, is a much larger safety
problem than lacerations from broken
glass. NHTSA addressed this safety
problem by issuing FMVSS No. 226,
‘‘Ejection mitigation,’’ in 2011. The
standard became fully phased-in in
2017. While glazing materials may be
one component of an ejection mitigation
countermeasure system, the scope of
FMVSS No. 205 is focused on material
performance in terms of the glazing
mechanical strength, optical properties,
and environmental durability. The tests
described in FMVSS No. 205 assure
conformance with minimum required
glazing equipment performance levels.
Based on the results of our review and
of available data and analysis of the
technically substantive comments, the
agency is unable to conclude at this
time that harmonizing FMVSS No. 205
with GTR No. 6 would, on balance,
increase or decrease safety. While some
of the proposed changes would be
expected to improve safety as they more
accurately reflect real world driving
conditions, others may result in a
decrease in safety. NHTSA has
determined that it does not have
sufficient data to evaluate the safety
implications of harmonizing FMVSS
No. 205 with GTR No. 6. Therefore,
NHTSA has determined that the most
appropriate path forward at this time is
to withdraw the 2012 NPRM.
In order to better inform future agency
decisions, NHTSA is planning a glazing
research study. NHTSA is also
monitoring SAE International’s efforts to
publish a new Glazing Standard, SAE
Standard J3097 ‘‘Standard for Safety
Glazing Materials for Glazing Motor
Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Equipment
Operating on Land Highways.’’ If this
study is undertaken as planned, it may
enable the agency to reach clearer
conclusions about the impact of
harmonizing FMVSS No. 205 with GTR
No. 6. Depending on the outcome of that
study and SAE’s progress, NHTSA
would consider those data in potential
next steps.
The agency notes that this document
does not represent a decision whether or
not to adopt GTR No. 6. NHTSA voted
in favor of establishing a global
technical regulation (GTR) on
automotive glazing and considered
adopting the regulations by issuing an
NPRM in 2012. However, after
considering public comments received
in response to the proposal, the agency
is withdrawing the NPRM to reconsider
its next steps. Accordingly, NHTSA
withdraws the 2012 proposed glazing
GTR harmonization rulemaking.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR part 1.95 and 501.5.
Heidi Renate King,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–06518 Filed 4–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
2 Docket
No. NHTSA–2012–0083.
3 Kahane, C.J. (2015, January). Lives saved by
vehicle safety technologies and associated Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, 1960 to 2012—
Passenger cars and LTVs—With reviews of 26
FMVSS and the effectiveness of their associated
safety technologies in reducing fatalities, injuries
and crashes. (Report No. DOT HS 812 069).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Apr 03, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13223
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R3–ES–2018–0056;
4500030113]
RIN 1018–BD26
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 12-Month Petition Finding
and Endangered Species Status for the
Missouri Distinct Population Segment
of Eastern Hellbender
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce a
12-month finding on a petition to list
the hellbender (Cryptobranchus
alleganiensis), a salamander species, as
an endangered or threatened species
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973 (Act), as amended. Because the
Service published a final rule to list the
Ozark hellbender subspecies
(Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi)
as endangered on October 6, 2011, this
12-month petition finding addresses the
eastern hellbender subspecies
(Cryptobranchus alleganiensis
alleganiensis). After review of the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we find that listing of the
eastern hellbender is not warranted.
However, we determined that listing is
warranted for a distinct population
segment (DPS) of the eastern hellbender
(Cryptobranchus alleganiensis
alleganiensis) in Missouri. Accordingly,
we propose to list the Missouri DPS of
the eastern hellbender (C. a.
alleganiensis) as an endangered species
under the Act. If we finalize this rule as
proposed, it would extend the Act’s
protections to this DPS.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
June 3, 2019. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES,
below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the closing date. We
must receive requests for public
hearings, in writing, at the address
shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT by May 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–R3–ES–2018–0056, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
Then, click on the Search button. On the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13222-13223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06518]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0024]
RIN 2127-AL03
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Glazing Materials
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA withdraws its June 21, 2012 Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM), which proposed revising Federal motor vehicle safety
standard (FMVSS) No. 205, ``Glazing materials,'' to harmonize it with
Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No. 6, ``Safety Glazing Materials for
Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Equipment.'' Based on the results of
the agency's review of available information and analysis of the
technically substantive comments on the proposal, NHTSA is unable to
conclude at this time that harmonizing FMVSS No. 205 with GTR No. 6
would increase safety.
DATES: As of April 4, 2019, the proposed amendments to 49 CFR part 571
that were contained in the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
published June 21, 2012 (77 FR 37477) are withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Myers, Office of Crashworthiness
Standards (Phone 202-366-1810; FAX: 202-366-2739) or Callie Roach,
Office of the Chief Counsel (Phone: 202-366-2992; FAX: 202-366-3820).
You may send mail to these officials at: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 205, ``Glazing
materials,'' (49 CFR 571.205), specifies performance requirements for
the types of glazing that may be installed in motor vehicles. It also
specifies the vehicle locations in which the various types of glazing
may be installed. The purpose of FMVSS No. 205 is to reduce injuries
(e.g., lacerations) resulting from impact to glazing surfaces, to
ensure a necessary degree of transparency in motor vehicle windows for
driver visibility, and to minimize the possibility of occupants being
thrown through the vehicle windows in collisions. FMVSS No. 205 applies
to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses,
motorcycles, slide-in campers, pickup covers designed to carry persons
while in motion and low speed vehicles, and to glazing materials for
use in those vehicles.
GTR No. 6, ``Safety Glazing Materials for Motor Vehicles and Motor
Vehicle Equipment,'' was adopted under the United Nations/Economic
Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) 1998 Agreement, which is administered by
World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation (WP.29). At the
one-hundred-and-thirty-second session of the WP.29 in March 2004, the
formal proposal to develop a GTR on safety glazing was adopted, and at
that time restricted the scope of the glazing GTR to glass safety
glazing, thereby excluding other materials, such as plastics. The
objective of GTR No. 6 is to develop an internationally harmonized
standard regarding the safety of glass automotive glazing materials.
GTR No. 6 includes requirements and tests to ensure that the mechanical
properties, optical qualities and environmental resistance of glazing
are satisfactory; it does not include type approval, plastic glazing
and installation requirements.
II. NPRM
On June 21, 2012, NHTSA published a NPRM \1\ as part of the
agency's ongoing effort to harmonize vehicle safety standards under the
UN/ECE 1998 agreement when, and to the extent, appropriate to do so.
The agency stated in the NPRM that harmonization with GTR No. 6 would
modernize the test procedures for tempered glass, laminated glass, and
glass-plastic glazing used in front windshields and rear and side
windows. The GTR proposed an upgraded fragmentation test for testing
the tempering of curved tempered glass, and a new procedure for testing
an optical property of the windshield at the angle of installation, to
more accurately reflect real world driving conditions than the current
procedure used in Standard No. 205. The agency said further that most
of the proposals were minor amendments that would harmonize differing
measurements and performance requirements for similar test procedures.
Many of the tests in the GTR were said to be substantially similar to
tests currently included in FMVSS No. 205.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 77 FR 37478.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Comments Received
In the NPRM, the agency requested public comment on whether the
[[Page 13223]]
proposed amendments reflecting provisions of the GTR are suitable for
being adopted into the Federal glazing standard. NHTSA received
comments from 14 entities in response to the NPRM to adopt GTR
provisions in FMVSS No. 205.\2\ These comments came from trade
associations, glazing manufacturers, automobile manufacturers, a
glazing industry expert, and a safety technology company. Overall, most
of the comments supported the harmonization efforts, though several
suggested revisions or requested clarification. A few commenters were
opposed to certain aspects of the proposed harmonization of glazing
standards, with one respondent completely opposing the NPRM. NHTSA also
received comments for definitions, markings, and cost.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0083.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Decision to Withdraw Rulemaking
Crash data indicates that current glazing materials are performing
acceptably. Since the 1960s, the magnitude of the safety problem for
glazing has been substantially reduced.\3\ The increased availability
of automatic occupant protection systems has resulted in a substantial
reduction in the numbers of occupants impacting the windshield and thus
being exposed to lacerative injuries from broken glass. The current
glazing standard ensures that emerging and evolving glazing
technologies produce commensurate benefits and that glazing remains a
safety concern rather than becoming a safety problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Kahane, C.J. (2015, January). Lives saved by vehicle safety
technologies and associated Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards,
1960 to 2012--Passenger cars and LTVs--With reviews of 26 FMVSS and
the effectiveness of their associated safety technologies in
reducing fatalities, injuries and crashes. (Report No. DOT HS 812
069). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to agency crash data, occupant ejection, particularly
during rollover events, is a much larger safety problem than
lacerations from broken glass. NHTSA addressed this safety problem by
issuing FMVSS No. 226, ``Ejection mitigation,'' in 2011. The standard
became fully phased-in in 2017. While glazing materials may be one
component of an ejection mitigation countermeasure system, the scope of
FMVSS No. 205 is focused on material performance in terms of the
glazing mechanical strength, optical properties, and environmental
durability. The tests described in FMVSS No. 205 assure conformance
with minimum required glazing equipment performance levels.
Based on the results of our review and of available data and
analysis of the technically substantive comments, the agency is unable
to conclude at this time that harmonizing FMVSS No. 205 with GTR No. 6
would, on balance, increase or decrease safety. While some of the
proposed changes would be expected to improve safety as they more
accurately reflect real world driving conditions, others may result in
a decrease in safety. NHTSA has determined that it does not have
sufficient data to evaluate the safety implications of harmonizing
FMVSS No. 205 with GTR No. 6. Therefore, NHTSA has determined that the
most appropriate path forward at this time is to withdraw the 2012
NPRM.
In order to better inform future agency decisions, NHTSA is
planning a glazing research study. NHTSA is also monitoring SAE
International's efforts to publish a new Glazing Standard, SAE Standard
J3097 ``Standard for Safety Glazing Materials for Glazing Motor
Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Equipment Operating on Land Highways.'' If
this study is undertaken as planned, it may enable the agency to reach
clearer conclusions about the impact of harmonizing FMVSS No. 205 with
GTR No. 6. Depending on the outcome of that study and SAE's progress,
NHTSA would consider those data in potential next steps.
The agency notes that this document does not represent a decision
whether or not to adopt GTR No. 6. NHTSA voted in favor of establishing
a global technical regulation (GTR) on automotive glazing and
considered adopting the regulations by issuing an NPRM in 2012.
However, after considering public comments received in response to the
proposal, the agency is withdrawing the NPRM to reconsider its next
steps. Accordingly, NHTSA withdraws the 2012 proposed glazing GTR
harmonization rulemaking.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
part 1.95 and 501.5.
Heidi Renate King,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-06518 Filed 4-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P