HEARTH Act Approval of Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond du Lac Band Leasing Ordinance, 12272-12273 [2019-06295]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
12272
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Notices
Abstract: The USGS proposes to
collect general demographic information
about public users that download
products from the USGS using Earth
Explorer (EE) application. This
information is used to help address
reports to Congress, OMB and DOI
management with planning public uses
of Landsat and other remote sensing
data. The most common uses of these
data are used to justify the maintenance
and the free distribution of the USGS
land remote sensing data. EE also stores
information about users that download
source code products, Global
Visualization Viewer (GloVis) for
example. The information collected in
the database includes the names,
affiliations, addresses, email address
and telephone numbers of individuals.
The information is gathered to facilitate
the reporting of demographic data for
use of the EE Application. Demographic
data is also used to make decisions on
future functional requirements within
the system.
Earth Explorer is a Web application
that enables users to find, preview, and
download or order digital data
published by the U.S. Geological
Survey. There are more than 300 USGS
Datasets available from the site. To
download or order products from EE,
users must register with the EE system.
The information is stored on an
internal encrypted database. The data is
provided by the customer and utilized
to notify the customer of data ready for
download. If downloads are
unsuccessful, the customer is contacted
to provide updated information. In
addition, EE requires certain fields to be
completed such as name, address, city
and zip code before an account can be
established and an order can be
submitted.
EE does not derive new data and does
not create new data through aggregation.
Personal information is not used as
search criteria. Access to the
information uses the least privileged
access methodology. Authorized
individuals with specifically granted
access to the Privacy Act data can
retrieve only by account number or
order number Personal data is encrypted
while stored in the Database.
Title of Collection: Earth Explorer
User Registration Service.
OMB Control Number: 1028–0119.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: Private
individuals who have requested USGS
products from USGS/Earth Explorer
application are covered in this system.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 84,000.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: Approximately 84,000 on an
annual basis.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: We estimate that it will take
2 minutes per response to submit the
requested information.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 2,800.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: The
information is collected at the time of
registration and is only updated by the
individual.
Total Estimated Annual Non-hour
Burden Cost: None.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authorities for this action are the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
Christopher Loria,
USGS EROS Center Director.
[FR Doc. 2019–06196 Filed 3–29–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4338–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[190A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900]
HEARTH Act Approval of Minnesota
Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond du
Lac Band Leasing Ordinance
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
On March 6, 2019, the Bureau
of Indian Affairs (BIA) approved the
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota,
Fond du Lac Band leasing ordinance
under the Helping Expedite and
Advance Responsible Tribal
Homeownership Act of 2012 (HEARTH
Act). With this approval, the Tribe is
authorized to enter into leases for
agricultural, residential, business, wind
and solar, wind energy evaluation, and
other authorized purposes without
further BIA approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Sharlene Round Face, Bureau of Indian
Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services,
MS–4642–MIB, 1849 C Street NW,
Washington, DC 20240, at (202) 208–
3615.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
The HEARTH Act makes a voluntary,
alternative land leasing process
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
available to Tribes, by amending the
Indian Long-Term Leasing Act of 1955,
25 U.S.C. 415. The HEARTH Act
authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter
into agricultural and business leases of
Tribal trust lands with a primary term
of 25 years, and up to two renewal terms
of 25 years each, without the approval
of the Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary). The HEARTH Act also
authorizes Tribes to enter into leases for
residential, recreational, religious or
educational purposes for a primary term
of up to 75 years without the approval
of the Secretary. Participating Tribes
develop Tribal leasing regulations,
including an environmental review
process, and then must obtain the
Secretary’s approval of those regulations
prior to entering into leases. The
HEARTH Act requires the Secretary to
approve Tribal regulations if the Tribal
regulations are consistent with the
Department of the Interior’s
(Department) leasing regulations at 25
CFR part 162 and provide for an
environmental review process that
meets requirements set forth in the
HEARTH Act. This notice announces
that the Secretary, through the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved
the Tribal regulations for the Minnesota
Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond du
Lac Band.
II. Federal Preemption of State and
Local Taxes
The Department’s regulations
governing the surface leasing of trust
and restricted Indian lands specify that,
subject to applicable Federal law,
permanent improvements on leased
land, leasehold or possessory interests,
and activities under the lease are not
subject to State and local taxation and
may be subject to taxation by the Indian
Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR
162.017. As explained further in the
preamble to the final regulations, the
Federal government has a strong interest
in promoting economic development,
self-determination, and Tribal
sovereignty. 77 FR 72,440, 72,447–48
(December 5, 2012). The principles
supporting the Federal preemption of
State law in the field of Indian leasing
and the taxation of lease-related
interests and activities applies with
equal force to leases entered into under
Tribal leasing regulations approved by
the Federal government pursuant to the
HEARTH Act.
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization
Act, 25 U.S.C. 5108, preempts State and
local taxation of permanent
improvements on trust land.
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis
Reservation v. Thurston County, 724
F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Notices
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411
U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly, section 5108
preempts state taxation of rent payments
by a lessee for leased trust lands,
because ‘‘tax on the payment of rent is
indistinguishable from an impermissible
tax on the land.’’ See Seminole Tribe of
Florida v. Stranburg, No. 14–14524,
*13-*17, n.8 (11th Cir. 2015). In
addition, as explained in the preamble
to the revised leasing regulations at 25
CFR part 162, Federal courts have
applied a balancing test to determine
whether State and local taxation of nonIndians on the reservation is preempted.
White Mountain Apache Tribe v.
Bracker, 448 U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The
Bracker balancing test, which is
conducted against a backdrop of
‘‘traditional notions of Indian selfgovernment,’’ requires a particularized
examination of the relevant State,
Federal, and Tribal interests. We hereby
adopt the Bracker analysis from the
preamble to the surface leasing
regulations, 77 FR at 72,447–48, as
supplemented by the analysis below.
The strong Federal and Tribal
interests against State and local taxation
of improvements, leaseholds, and
activities on land leased under the
Department’s leasing regulations apply
equally to improvements, leaseholds,
and activities on land leased pursuant to
Tribal leasing regulations approved
under the HEARTH Act. Congress’s
overarching intent was to ‘‘allow Tribes
to exercise greater control over their
own land, support self-determination,
and eliminate bureaucratic delays that
stand in the way of homeownership and
economic development in Tribal
communities.’’ 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682
(May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was
intended to afford Tribes ‘‘flexibility to
adapt lease terms to suit [their] business
and cultural needs’’ and to ‘‘enable
[Tribes] to approve leases quickly and
efficiently.’’ Id. at 5–6.
Assessment of State and local taxes
would obstruct these express Federal
policies supporting Tribal economic
development and self-determination,
and also threaten substantial Tribal
interests in effective Tribal government,
economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills
Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024,
2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring)
(determining that ‘‘[a] key goal of the
Federal Government is to render Tribes
more self-sufficient, and better
positioned to fund their own sovereign
functions, rather than relying on Federal
funding’’). The additional costs of State
and local taxation have a chilling effect
on potential lessees, as well as on a
Tribe that, as a result, might refrain from
exercising its own sovereign right to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
impose a Tribal tax to support its
infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043–44
(finding that State and local taxes
greatly discourage Tribes from raising
tax revenue from the same sources
because the imposition of double
taxation would impede Tribal economic
growth).
Similar to BIA’s surface leasing
regulations, Tribal regulations under the
HEARTH Act pervasively cover all
aspects of leasing. See 25 U.S.C.
415(h)(3)(B)(i) (requiring Tribal
regulations be consistent with BIA
surface leasing regulations).
Furthermore, the Federal government
remains involved in the Tribal land
leasing process by approving the Tribal
leasing regulations in the first instance
and providing technical assistance,
upon request by a Tribe, for the
development of an environmental
review process. The Secretary also
retains authority to take any necessary
actions to remedy violations of a lease
or of the Tribal regulations, including
terminating the lease or rescinding
approval of the Tribal regulations and
reassuming lease approval
responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary
continues to review, approve, and
monitor individual Indian land leases
and other types of leases not covered
under the Tribal regulations according
to the Part 162 regulations.
Accordingly, the Federal and Tribal
interests weigh heavily in favor of
preemption of State and local taxes on
lease-related activities and interests,
regardless of whether the lease is
governed by Tribal leasing regulations
or Part 162. Improvements, activities,
and leasehold or possessory interests
may be subject to taxation by the
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota,
Fond du Lac Band.
Dated: March 6, 2019.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019–06295 Filed 3–29–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[190A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900253G]
Indian Gaming; Approval of TribalState Class III Gaming Compact
Amendment in the State of South
Dakota
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12273
This notice publishes the
approval of the Amended Gaming
Compact between the SissetonWahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse
Reservation (Tribe) and the State of
South Dakota (Amendment).
DATES: The compact amendment takes
effect on April 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100–
497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR
293.4, all compacts and amendments are
subject to review and approval by the
Secretary. The Amendment increases
the number of slot machines the Tribe
may operate, decreases certain
regulatory costs for emergency services
agreements, and eliminates tribal
contributions paid from pari-mutuel
gaming to schools. The Amendment is
approved.
SUMMARY:
Dated: March 13, 2019.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019–06296 Filed 3–29–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCA942000 L57000000.BX0000 18X
L5017AR; MO#4500132333]
Filing of Plats of Survey: California
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of official filing.
AGENCY:
The plats of survey of lands
described in this notice are scheduled to
be officially filed in the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), California State
Office, Sacramento, California, 30
calendar days from the date of this
publication. The surveys, which were
executed at the request of the U.S.
Forest Service and the Bureau of Land
Management, are necessary for the
management of these lands.
DATES: Unless there are protests to this
action, the plats described in this notice
will be filed on May 1, 2019.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 62 (Monday, April 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12272-12273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06295]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[190A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]
HEARTH Act Approval of Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond
du Lac Band Leasing Ordinance
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 6, 2019, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) approved
the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond du Lac Band leasing
ordinance under the Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal
Homeownership Act of 2012 (HEARTH Act). With this approval, the Tribe
is authorized to enter into leases for agricultural, residential,
business, wind and solar, wind energy evaluation, and other authorized
purposes without further BIA approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sharlene Round Face, Bureau of
Indian Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, MS-4642-MIB, 1849 C
Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, at (202) 208-3615.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
The HEARTH Act makes a voluntary, alternative land leasing process
available to Tribes, by amending the Indian Long-Term Leasing Act of
1955, 25 U.S.C. 415. The HEARTH Act authorizes Tribes to negotiate and
enter into agricultural and business leases of Tribal trust lands with
a primary term of 25 years, and up to two renewal terms of 25 years
each, without the approval of the Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary). The HEARTH Act also authorizes Tribes to enter into leases
for residential, recreational, religious or educational purposes for a
primary term of up to 75 years without the approval of the Secretary.
Participating Tribes develop Tribal leasing regulations, including an
environmental review process, and then must obtain the Secretary's
approval of those regulations prior to entering into leases. The HEARTH
Act requires the Secretary to approve Tribal regulations if the Tribal
regulations are consistent with the Department of the Interior's
(Department) leasing regulations at 25 CFR part 162 and provide for an
environmental review process that meets requirements set forth in the
HEARTH Act. This notice announces that the Secretary, through the
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, has approved the Tribal
regulations for the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond du Lac
Band.
II. Federal Preemption of State and Local Taxes
The Department's regulations governing the surface leasing of trust
and restricted Indian lands specify that, subject to applicable Federal
law, permanent improvements on leased land, leasehold or possessory
interests, and activities under the lease are not subject to State and
local taxation and may be subject to taxation by the Indian Tribe with
jurisdiction. See 25 CFR 162.017. As explained further in the preamble
to the final regulations, the Federal government has a strong interest
in promoting economic development, self-determination, and Tribal
sovereignty. 77 FR 72,440, 72,447-48 (December 5, 2012). The principles
supporting the Federal preemption of State law in the field of Indian
leasing and the taxation of lease-related interests and activities
applies with equal force to leases entered into under Tribal leasing
regulations approved by the Federal government pursuant to the HEARTH
Act.
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. 5108,
preempts State and local taxation of permanent improvements on trust
land. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Thurston
County, 724 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing
[[Page 12273]]
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly,
section 5108 preempts state taxation of rent payments by a lessee for
leased trust lands, because ``tax on the payment of rent is
indistinguishable from an impermissible tax on the land.'' See Seminole
Tribe of Florida v. Stranburg, No. 14-14524, *13-*17, n.8 (11th Cir.
2015). In addition, as explained in the preamble to the revised leasing
regulations at 25 CFR part 162, Federal courts have applied a balancing
test to determine whether State and local taxation of non-Indians on
the reservation is preempted. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker,
448 U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The Bracker balancing test, which is
conducted against a backdrop of ``traditional notions of Indian self-
government,'' requires a particularized examination of the relevant
State, Federal, and Tribal interests. We hereby adopt the Bracker
analysis from the preamble to the surface leasing regulations, 77 FR at
72,447-48, as supplemented by the analysis below.
The strong Federal and Tribal interests against State and local
taxation of improvements, leaseholds, and activities on land leased
under the Department's leasing regulations apply equally to
improvements, leaseholds, and activities on land leased pursuant to
Tribal leasing regulations approved under the HEARTH Act. Congress's
overarching intent was to ``allow Tribes to exercise greater control
over their own land, support self-determination, and eliminate
bureaucratic delays that stand in the way of homeownership and economic
development in Tribal communities.'' 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682 (May 15,
2012). The HEARTH Act was intended to afford Tribes ``flexibility to
adapt lease terms to suit [their] business and cultural needs'' and to
``enable [Tribes] to approve leases quickly and efficiently.'' Id. at
5-6.
Assessment of State and local taxes would obstruct these express
Federal policies supporting Tribal economic development and self-
determination, and also threaten substantial Tribal interests in
effective Tribal government, economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024,
2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring) (determining that ``[a] key
goal of the Federal Government is to render Tribes more self-
sufficient, and better positioned to fund their own sovereign
functions, rather than relying on Federal funding''). The additional
costs of State and local taxation have a chilling effect on potential
lessees, as well as on a Tribe that, as a result, might refrain from
exercising its own sovereign right to impose a Tribal tax to support
its infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043-44 (finding that State and
local taxes greatly discourage Tribes from raising tax revenue from the
same sources because the imposition of double taxation would impede
Tribal economic growth).
Similar to BIA's surface leasing regulations, Tribal regulations
under the HEARTH Act pervasively cover all aspects of leasing. See 25
U.S.C. 415(h)(3)(B)(i) (requiring Tribal regulations be consistent with
BIA surface leasing regulations). Furthermore, the Federal government
remains involved in the Tribal land leasing process by approving the
Tribal leasing regulations in the first instance and providing
technical assistance, upon request by a Tribe, for the development of
an environmental review process. The Secretary also retains authority
to take any necessary actions to remedy violations of a lease or of the
Tribal regulations, including terminating the lease or rescinding
approval of the Tribal regulations and reassuming lease approval
responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary continues to review, approve,
and monitor individual Indian land leases and other types of leases not
covered under the Tribal regulations according to the Part 162
regulations.
Accordingly, the Federal and Tribal interests weigh heavily in
favor of preemption of State and local taxes on lease-related
activities and interests, regardless of whether the lease is governed
by Tribal leasing regulations or Part 162. Improvements, activities,
and leasehold or possessory interests may be subject to taxation by the
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond du Lac Band.
Dated: March 6, 2019.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019-06295 Filed 3-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
