Air Plan Approval; Tennessee; Updates to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Chattanooga, 11917-11919 [2019-06115]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 61 / Friday, March 29, 2019 / Proposed Rules described in subparagraphs (2)(g)1. and 2. of this rule. 1. A new emissions unit is any emissions unit that is (or will be) newly constructed and that has existed for less than 2 years from the date such emissions unit first operated. 2. An existing emissions unit is any emissions unit that does not meet the requirements of subparagraph (2)(g)1. of this rule. A replacement unit, as defined in subparagraph (bbb) of this rule, is an existing emissions unit. EPA has preliminarily concluded that these changes to Rule 335–3–14– .04(2)(g) and the adoption of Rule 335– 3–14–.04(2)(bbb) will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171), or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. The aforementioned changes align Alabama’s PSD regulations regarding replacement units, which are found at Rule 335–3–14–.04, with the Federal PSD regulations. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve these changes into the Alabama SIP. jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS IV. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference ADEM Administrative Code Rule 335– 3–14–.04(2)(g) and 335–3–14– .04(2)(bbb), which add a definition of ‘‘replacement unit’’ and provide that a replacement unit is a type of existing emissions unit under the definition of ‘‘emissions unit,’’ state effective on October 5, 2018. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). V. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve changes to the Alabama SIP, that were provided to EPA through Alabama’s May 7, 2012, SIP revision, with the exception of portions that were withdrawn in the May 7, 2017, withdrawal letter, as well as changes provided to EPA through Alabama’s August 27, 2018, SIP revision. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve changes to ADEM Administrative Code Rule 335–3–14– .04(2)(g), as well as new Rule 335–3–14– .04(2)(bbb), as described above, in order to make Alabama’s PSD program consistent with Federal provisions and the CAA regarding RMRR. This action is VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Mar 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 limited to the two rules currently before the Agency and does not modify any other PSD rules in Alabama’s SIP. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11917 The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: March 18, 2019. Mary S. Walker, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2019–06108 Filed 3–28–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0004; FRL–9991–48– Region 4] Air Plan Approval; Tennessee; Updates to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Chattanooga Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP), provided by the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) from Chattanooga/ Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Bureau by a letter dated September 12, 2018. The revision updates the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP to reflect recent revisions made to the NAAQS. EPA is proposing to approve the changes because they are consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 29, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2019–0004 at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1 11918 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 61 / Friday, March 29, 2019 / Proposed Rules instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evan Adams of the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Adams can be reached by phone at (404) 562–9009 or via electronic mail at adams.evan@ epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS I. Background Sections 108 and 109 of the CAA govern the establishment, review, and revision, as appropriate, of the NAAQS to protect public health and welfare for six criteria pollutants: ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM) (including fine particulate matter, or PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The CAA requires periodic review of the air quality criteria, the science upon which the standards are based, and the standards themselves. EPA’s regulatory provisions that govern the NAAQS are found at 40 CFR 50 National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards. On September 12, 2018, TDEC submitted to EPA a SIP revision to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP that contains changes to several of Chattanooga-Hamilton County’s air quality rules in Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4–41.1 Through this 1 EPA notes that the Agency received the SIP revisions on September 18, 2018, along with other revisions to the Chattanooga portion of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Mar 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 action, EPA is proposing to approve changes to the SIP that delete the current version and substitute a revised version of Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4–41, Rule 21 of the Chattanooga City Code ‘‘Ambient Air Quality Standards.’’ Hamilton County revised its rule to be consistent with changes to federal NAAQS. II. Analysis of State’s Submittal Through a letter dated September 12, 2018, TDEC submitted a SIP revision to EPA for review and approval. The revision deletes the current version and substitutes a revised version of Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4–41, Rule 21 of the Chattanooga City Code, ‘‘Ambient Air Quality Standards.’’ Chattanooga/Hamilton County revised Rule 21 to update the NAAQS in the SIP for each criteria pollutant—CO, Pb, NO2, O3, PM, and SO2—to maintain consistency with the federal NAAQS. See Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide, 76 FR 54294 (August 31, 2011); Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead, 81 FR 71906 (October 18, 2016); Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen, 83 FR 17226 (April 18, 2018) (as measured by NO2); Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur, 77 FR 20218 (April 3, 2012); National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015); National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter,2 78 FR 3086 (January 15, 2013) (addressing fine and coarse particulate matter); and Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide,3 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010). EPA is approving this revision to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP to maintain consistency with the NAAQS. The Chattanooga/Hamilton County rule revision became stateeffective on January 23, 2017. EPA has Tennessee SIP. EPA will be considering action for those SIP revisions in a separate rulemaking. 2 On October 17, 2006, EPA revoked the 1-year primary and secondary PM10 NAAQS. See 71 FR 61144. 3 On June 22, 2010, EPA promulgated a revised primary SO2 NAAQS. See 75 FR 35520. The revised SO2 NAAQS is an hourly standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb), based on a 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations. In the same action, EPA also revoked the 24-hour and annual primary SO2 NAAQS. See 75 FR 35520. On September 14, 1973, EPA also revoked the 3-hour secondary SO2 NAAQS. See 38 FR 25678. The former primary SO2 NAAQS for the 1971 annual and 24-hour ambient air quality standards set forth in 40 CFR 50.4 will continue to apply to an area until one year after the effective date of the designation of that area, pursuant to section 107 of the CAA, for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS set forth in § 50.17. See 40 CFR 50.4(e). PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 reviewed these changes to the Chattanooga/Hamilton County regulations for CO, Pb, NO2, PM, O3 and SO2, and has made the preliminary determination that these changes are consistent with federal regulations.4 III. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference changes to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP at Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4–41, Rule 21, state effective January 23, 2017. The amendments update the criteria pollutant standards to reflect the federal regulations. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned changes to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP because the changes are consistent with section 110 of the CAA. The changes in Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4–41, Rule 21, of the Chattanooga Code incorporate changes to the criteria pollutant standards to reflect the changes in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 40 CFR part 50. EPA views these changes as being consistent with the CAA. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: 4 EPA notes that Chattanooga/Hamilton County included Gaseous Fluorides (expressed as HF) in the table of Ambient Air Quality Standards; however, the EPA does not recognize gaseous fluorides as a criteria pollutant. Chattanooga/ Hamilton County also specifies in Section 15, Rule 21, Part 7 that the standards for gaseous fluorides are for the State of Tennessee. Gaseous fluorides are not included in the Federal NAAQS, therefore, EPA is not acting on these changes to the SIP. E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 61 / Friday, March 29, 2019 / Proposed Rules jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds, Lead, Carbon Monoxide. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Mar 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: March 18, 2019. Mary S. Walker, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2019–06115 Filed 3–28–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0807; FRL–9991–46– Region 4] Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Jefferson County Existing and New VOC Water Separators Rule Revision Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve two revisions to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division of Air Quality (KDAQ), through a letter dated March 15, 2018. The changes were submitted by KDAQ on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (LMAPCD) (also referred to herein as Jefferson County) and make minor ministerial amendments to applicability dates and clarify standards applicable to both existing and new volatile organic compounds (VOC) water separators. EPA is proposing to approve these changes because they are consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 29, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2018–0807 at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11919 other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evan Adams of the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone number is (404) 562–9009. Mr. Adams can also be reached via electronic mail at adams.evan@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. What action is EPA proposing? Through a letter dated March 15, 2018, KDAQ provided SIP revisions to EPA for the approval of changes to the Jefferson County Regulations 6.26 and 7.36.1 EPA is proposing to approve the changes to Jefferson County Regulation 6.26, Standards of Performance for Existing Volatile Organic Compound Water Separators, and Regulation 7.36, Standards of Performance for New Volatile Organic Compound Water Separators. The SIP revisions update the current SIP-approved versions of Regulation 6.26 (Version 2) and Regulation 7.36 (Version 3) to Version 3 and Version 4, respectively. The changes that are being proposed for approval in this rulemaking, and EPA’s rationale for proposing approval, are described in more detail below. II. EPA’s Analysis of the State Submittal The changes to Jefferson County Air Quality Regulations 6.26 and 7.36 are administrative in nature. The amendments to each regulation’s Section 1, Applicability, better align the two regulations, reconciling and clarifying their respective applicability based on the date of a facility’s existence, construction, modification, or reconstruction. In the current SIPapproved versions, the regulations’ applicability overlaps by approximately four years, with Regulation 6.26 covering facilities built before that regulation’s original effective date (which is September 1, 1976), and Regulation 7.36 covering facilities built on or after that regulation’s original 1 EPA notes that the Agency received this SIP revision on March 23, 2018, along with other revisions to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP. EPA will be considering action for those SIP revisions in a separate rulemaking. E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 61 (Friday, March 29, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11917-11919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2019-0004; FRL-9991-48-Region 4]


Air Plan Approval; Tennessee; Updates to the National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards for Chattanooga

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a revision to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee State 
Implementation Plan (SIP), provided by the State of Tennessee, through 
the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) from 
Chattanooga/Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Bureau by a letter 
dated September 12, 2018. The revision updates the National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee 
SIP to reflect recent revisions made to the NAAQS. EPA is proposing to 
approve the changes because they are consistent with the Clean Air Act 
(CAA or Act).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 29, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2019-0004 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online

[[Page 11918]]

instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment 
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment 
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general 
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evan Adams of the Air Regulatory 
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, 
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 
30303-8960. Mr. Adams can be reached by phone at (404) 562-9009 or via 
electronic mail at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Sections 108 and 109 of the CAA govern the establishment, review, 
and revision, as appropriate, of the NAAQS to protect public health and 
welfare for six criteria pollutants: ozone (O3), particulate 
matter (PM) (including fine particulate matter, or PM2.5), 
carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and 
nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The CAA requires periodic review of 
the air quality criteria, the science upon which the standards are 
based, and the standards themselves. EPA's regulatory provisions that 
govern the NAAQS are found at 40 CFR 50 National Primary and Secondary 
Ambient Air Quality Standards.
    On September 12, 2018, TDEC submitted to EPA a SIP revision to the 
Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP that contains changes to 
several of Chattanooga-Hamilton County's air quality rules in Part II, 
Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4-41.\1\ Through this action, EPA is 
proposing to approve changes to the SIP that delete the current version 
and substitute a revised version of Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, 
Section 4-41, Rule 21 of the Chattanooga City Code ``Ambient Air 
Quality Standards.'' Hamilton County revised its rule to be consistent 
with changes to federal NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA notes that the Agency received the SIP revisions on 
September 18, 2018, along with other revisions to the Chattanooga 
portion of the Tennessee SIP. EPA will be considering action for 
those SIP revisions in a separate rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Analysis of State's Submittal

    Through a letter dated September 12, 2018, TDEC submitted a SIP 
revision to EPA for review and approval. The revision deletes the 
current version and substitutes a revised version of Part II, Chapter 
4, Article II, Section 4-41, Rule 21 of the Chattanooga City Code, 
``Ambient Air Quality Standards.'' Chattanooga/Hamilton County revised 
Rule 21 to update the NAAQS in the SIP for each criteria pollutant--CO, 
Pb, NO2, O3, PM, and SO2--to maintain 
consistency with the federal NAAQS. See Review of National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide, 76 FR 54294 (August 31, 2011); 
Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead, 81 FR 
71906 (October 18, 2016); Review of the Primary National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen, 83 FR 17226 (April 18, 2018) 
(as measured by NO2); Secondary National Ambient Air Quality 
Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur, 77 FR 20218 (April 3, 
2012); National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, 80 FR 65292 
(October 26, 2015); National Ambient Air Quality Standards for 
Particulate Matter,\2\ 78 FR 3086 (January 15, 2013) (addressing fine 
and coarse particulate matter); and Primary National Ambient Air 
Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide,\3\ 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010). 
EPA is approving this revision to the Chattanooga portion of the 
Tennessee SIP to maintain consistency with the NAAQS. The Chattanooga/
Hamilton County rule revision became state-effective on January 23, 
2017. EPA has reviewed these changes to the Chattanooga/Hamilton County 
regulations for CO, Pb, NO2, PM, O3 and 
SO2, and has made the preliminary determination that these 
changes are consistent with federal regulations.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ On October 17, 2006, EPA revoked the 1-year primary and 
secondary PM10 NAAQS. See 71 FR 61144.
    \3\ On June 22, 2010, EPA promulgated a revised primary 
SO2 NAAQS. See 75 FR 35520. The revised SO2 
NAAQS is an hourly standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb), based on 
a 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour daily 
maximum concentrations. In the same action, EPA also revoked the 24-
hour and annual primary SO2 NAAQS. See 75 FR 35520. On 
September 14, 1973, EPA also revoked the 3-hour secondary 
SO2 NAAQS. See 38 FR 25678. The former primary 
SO2 NAAQS for the 1971 annual and 24-hour ambient air 
quality standards set forth in 40 CFR 50.4 will continue to apply to 
an area until one year after the effective date of the designation 
of that area, pursuant to section 107 of the CAA, for the 2010 
SO2 NAAQS set forth in Sec.  50.17. See 40 CFR 50.4(e).
    \4\ EPA notes that Chattanooga/Hamilton County included Gaseous 
Fluorides (expressed as HF) in the table of Ambient Air Quality 
Standards; however, the EPA does not recognize gaseous fluorides as 
a criteria pollutant. Chattanooga/Hamilton County also specifies in 
Section 15, Rule 21, Part 7 that the standards for gaseous fluorides 
are for the State of Tennessee. Gaseous fluorides are not included 
in the Federal NAAQS, therefore, EPA is not acting on these changes 
to the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by 
reference changes to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP at 
Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4-41, Rule 21, state effective 
January 23, 2017. The amendments update the criteria pollutant 
standards to reflect the federal regulations. EPA has made, and will 
continue to make, these materials generally available through 
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the 
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this preamble for more information).

IV. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned changes to the 
Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP because the changes are 
consistent with section 110 of the CAA. The changes in Part II, Chapter 
4, Article II, Section 4-41, Rule 21, of the Chattanooga Code 
incorporate changes to the criteria pollutant standards to reflect the 
changes in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 40 CFR part 50. EPA 
views these changes as being consistent with the CAA.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely 
proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does 
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
For that reason, this proposed action:

[[Page 11919]]

     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or 
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does 
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 
oxides, Volatile organic compounds, Lead, Carbon Monoxide.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: March 18, 2019.
Mary S. Walker,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2019-06115 Filed 3-28-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.