Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 10784-10786 [2019-05523]

Download as PDF 10784 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2019 / Notices Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and conference ID number. Members of the public are entitled to make comments during the open period at the end of the meeting. Members of the public may also submit written comments; the comments must be received in the Regional Programs Unit within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the Western Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 90012. They may be faxed to the Commission at (213) 894–0508, or emailed Ana Victoria Fortes at afortes@ usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact the Regional Programs Unit at (213) 894– 3437. Records and documents discussed during the meeting will be available for public viewing prior to and after the meetings at https:// www.facadatabase.gov/FACA/ FACAPublicViewCommitteeDetails?id= a10t0000001gzltAAA. Please click on the ‘‘Committee Meetings’’ tab. Records generated from these meetings may also be inspected and reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit, as they become available, both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this Committee are directed to the Commission’s website, https:// www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Regional Programs Unit at the above email or street address. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Agenda Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017 I. Welcome II. Administrative a. Scheduling Meetings b. Vice Chair III. Discussion Regarding Civil Rights Topics a. Review Topics b. Open Discussion IV. Public Comment V. Next Steps Adjournment Dated: March 19, 2019. David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. [FR Doc. 2019–05534 Filed 3–21–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Mar 21, 2019 Jkt 247001 Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–62–2018] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 294— Western Kentucky; Authorization of Production Activity; Mayfield Consumer Products; (Candles); Mayfield and Hickory, Kentucky On October 10, 2018, the Paducah McCracken County Riverport Authority, grantee of FTZ 294, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Mayfield Consumer Products, within Subzone 294A, in Mayfield and Hickory, Kentucky. The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (83 FR 52383, October 17, 2018). On March 19, 2019, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14. Dated: March 19, 2019. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–05519 Filed 3–21–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–878] Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk) made sales of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at less than normal value, and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) did not, during the period of review (POR), January 4, 2016, through June 30, 2017. DATES: Applicable March 22, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lingjun Wang or Elfi Blum-Page, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–2316 or at 202–482–0197, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the Preliminary Results on August 10, 2018.1 On February 7, 2019, Commerce determined that a cost-based particular market situation existed with respect to the production cost of CORE in Korea during the POR.2 For a history of events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 On November 19, 2018, Commerce postponed the final results of this review until February 6, 2019.4 As a result of the partial government shutdown, the deadline for the final results of this review was revised to March 18, 2019.5 Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are certain corrosion-resistant steel products. For a complete description of the scope of this order, see attachment to the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties are addressed in the IDM, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues are identified in the Appendix to this notice. The IDM is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room 1 See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 2017, 83 FR 39666 (August 10, 2018) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Commerce February 7, 2019 Memorandum re: Post-Preliminary Decision Memorandum on Particular Market Situation Allegation (PMS Memorandum). 3 See Memorandum re: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea; 2016– 2017 (Issues and Decision Memorandum, or IDM), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. 4 See Commerce November 19, 2018 Memorandum re: Extension of Deadline for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017. 5 See Commerce January 28, 2019 Memorandum re: Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by the partial federal government closure have been extended by 40 days. E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2019 / Notices Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of Changes Since the Preliminary Results publication, as provided by section Based on our review of the record and 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit comments received from interested rate for the respondents noted above parties, we made certain revisions to the will be the rate established in the final preliminary margin calculations for results of this administrative review; (2) Dongkuk and Hyundai.6 for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered Final Results of the Administrative in this administrative review but Review covered in a prior segment of the We have determined the following proceeding, the cash deposit rate will weighted-average dumping margins for continue to be the company-specific rate the exporters or producers listed below published for the most recently for the POR: 7 completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered Weightedin this review, a prior review, or the average original investigation, but the producer Exporter/producer dumping is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate margin established for the most recently (percent) completed segment of this proceeding Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd .. 7.33 for the producer of the subject Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd .......... 7.33 merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Hyundai Steel Company ....... 0.00 rate for all other producers or exporters POSCO ................................. 7.33 will continue to be 8.31 percent, the allothers cash deposit rate established in Assessment Rates the investigation.8 These cash deposit Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the requirements, when imposed, shall Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), remain in effect until further notice. and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce Notification to Importers Regarding the will determine, and U.S. Customs and Reimbursement of Duties Border Protections (CBP) shall assess, This notice also serves as a final antidumping duties on all appropriate reminder to importers of their entries of subject merchandise in responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) accordance with the final results of this to file a certificate regarding the review. We will calculate importerreimbursement of antidumping duties specific assessment rates on the basis of prior to liquidation of the relevant the ratio of the total amount of entries during the POR. Failure to antidumping duties calculated for each comply with this requirement could importer’s examined sales and the total result in Commerce’s presumption that entered value of the sales in accordance reimbursement of antidumping duties with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). occurred and the subsequent assessment For entries of subject merchandise of doubled antidumping duties. during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know its Administrative Protective Order merchandise was destined for the This notice also serves as a reminder United States, we will instruct CBP to to parties subject to administrative liquidate such entries at the all-others protective orders (APO) of their rate if there is no rate for the responsibility concerning the return or intermediate company(ies) involved in destruction of proprietary information the transaction. We intend to issue disclosed under APO in accordance liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely after publication of the final results of 8 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products this review. B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the IDM can be accessed at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed IDM and the electronic versions of the IDM are identical in content. 6 See Dongkuk’s and Hyundai’s Final Calculation Memorandum, dated March 18, 2019. 7 For POSCO and Dongbu Steel Co, Ltd. which were not selected for individual review, we assign a rate based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis or based entirely on facts available. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Mar 21, 2019 Jkt 247001 from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25, 2016), as amended by Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Determination of Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Results, 83 FR 39054 (August 8, 2018). PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10785 written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: March 19, 2019. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final IDM I. Summary II. List of Comments III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results VI. Discussion of the Comments General Comment Comment 1: Whether a Cost-Based Particular Market Situation Exists in Korea Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk) Comments Comment 2: Whether Dongkuk is Affiliated with POSCO Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Dongkuk Because it Failed to Report Certain Information Related to POSCO Comment 4: Whether to Adjust the Price of Dongkuk’s Purchases from JFE Steel Corporation Comment 5: Whether to Apply AFA to Freight Provided by Dongkuk’s Affiliated Provider Comment 6: Whether to Grant a Constructed Export Price (CEP) Offset to Dongkuk Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) Comments Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total AFA to Hyundai Comment 8: Whether Hyundai Overallocated U.S. Price to the CORE Input of its Sales of After-Service Auto Parts Comment 9: Whether Hyundai Withheld CONNUM-Specific Costs and Submitted Aberrational Cost Data Comment 10: Whether Hyundai Withheld Other Information Requested by Commerce Comment 11: Whether a Close Supplier Relationship Exists between Hyundai’s Captive, Intermediate Processors and the Hyundai Group, Thereby Creating Artificial U.S. Prices Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Apply Partial AFA to Hyundai Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Use Hyundai’s Manufacturer Variable Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Grant a CEP Offset to Hyundai Comment 15: Whether Commerce Should Use Hyundai’s Customer-Specific Warranty Expenses E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1 10786 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2019 / Notices VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–05523 Filed 3–21–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–075, C–570–076] Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; and Countervailing Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (the ITC), Commerce is issuing antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain plastic decorative ribbon (plastic ribbon) from the People’s Republic of China (China). In addition, Commerce is amending its final AD determination of sales at less than fair value (LTFV) as a result of ministerial errors. DATES: Applicable March 22, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlotte Baskin-Gerwitz at (202) 482– 4880 (CVD); or Nancy Decker, or Lauren Caserta, at (202) 482–0196, (202) 482– 4737, respectively (AD), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On February 1, 2019, and in accordance with section 735(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published its final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV with respect to plastic ribbon from China,1 and, in accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, Commerce published its final affirmative determination that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of plastic ribbon from China.2 On March 1, 2019, 1 See Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon from the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 84 FR 1055 (February 1, 2019), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (AD Final Determination). 2 See Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon from the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 84 FR 1064 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Mar 21, 2019 Jkt 247001 we published a Corrected CVD Final Determination for the CVD investigation.3 On February 4 and 5, 2019, Commerce received timely ministerial error allegations in the AD investigation.4 On February 13, 2019, Commerce received rebuttal comments to the ministerial error allegations.5 See the ‘‘Amendment to the AD Final Determination’’ section below. On March 15, 2019, pursuant to sections 735(d) and 705(d) of the Act, the ITC notified Commerce of its affirmative final determination that an industry in the United States is materially injured within the meaning of sections 735(b)(1)(A)(i) and 705(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by reason of LTFV imports and subsidized imports of subject merchandise, respectively, from China.6 Scope of the Orders The product covered by these orders is plastic ribbon from China. For a complete description of the scope of these orders, see the Appendix to this notice. Amendment to the AD Final Determination Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the AD Final Determination to correct certain ministerial errors made in the AD Final Determination with respect to Ricai and Junlong.7 This amended final AD determination corrects these errors and revises the weighted-average margins (February 1, 2019), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (CVD Final Determination). 3 See Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon from the People’s Republic of China: Corrected Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 84 FR 7019 (March 1, 2019) (Corrected CVD Final Determination). 4 See Letter from Berwick Offray LLC (the petitioner), ‘‘Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon from the People’s Republic of China: Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated February 4, 2019, and Letter from Dongguan Ricai Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. and Ricai Film Artwork Materials Co., Ltd. (collectively, Ricai), a respondent in the AD investigation, ‘‘Plastic Decorative Ribbons from PRC (‘‘Decorative Ribbons’’); A–570–075; Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ dated February 5, 2019. 5 See Letter from Ningbo Junlong Craft Gift Co., Ltd. (Junlong), a respondent in the AD investigation, ‘‘Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon from the People’s Republic of China—Reply to Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated February 13, 2019. 6 See ITC Notification Letter to the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance referencing ITC Investigation Nos. 701– TA–592 and 731–TA–1400 (March 15, 2019) (ITC Notification). 7 For a detailed discussion, see the Memorandum, ‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum for the Affirmative Final Determination of the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon from the People’s Republic of China’’ dated March 11, 2019 (AD Ministerial Error Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 that were calculated for Ricai and Junlong. Because the margin for the separate rate companies is based on the rates for Junlong and Ricai, and their rates changed due to the aforementioned ministerial errors, we are revising the margin applicable to the nonindividually investigated separate rate companies in this amended final AD determination.8 The amended weightedaverage margin rates are listed in the ‘‘Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins’’ table below. Antidumping Duty Order In accordance with sections 735(b)(1)(A)(i) and 735(d) of the Act, the ITC notified Commerce of its final determination that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of plastic ribbon from China that are sold in the United States at LTFV.9 Therefore, in accordance with sections 735(c)(2) and 736(a) of the Act, we are issuing this antidumping duty order. Because the ITC determined that imports of plastic ribbon from China are materially injuring a U.S. industry, unliquidated entries of such merchandise from these countries, entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, are subject to the assessment of antidumping duties. Therefore, in accordance with section 736(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds the export price (or constructed export price) of the merchandise, for all relevant entries of plastic ribbon from China. Antidumping duties will be assessed on unliquidated entries of plastic ribbon from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after August 8, 2018, the date of publication of the AD Preliminary Determination,10 and before February 4, 2019. Section 733(d) of the Act states that the suspension of liquidation pursuant to a preliminary determination may not remain in effect for more than four months except where exporters representing a significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise request Commerce to extend that four-month period to no more than six months. At the request of Junlong and Dongguan Mei Song Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. (Mei Song), two 8 See AD Ministerial Error Memorandum. ITC Determination. 10 See Certain Plastic Decorative Ribbon from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 39058 (August 8, 2018) (Preliminary Determination). 9 See E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10784-10786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-878]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of 
Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-
2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Dongkuk 
Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk) made sales of certain corrosion-
resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at 
less than normal value, and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) did not, 
during the period of review (POR), January 4, 2016, through June 30, 
2017.

DATES: Applicable March 22, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lingjun Wang or Elfi Blum-Page, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-2316 or at 202-482-0197, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results on August 10, 2018.\1\ 
On February 7, 2019, Commerce determined that a cost-based particular 
market situation existed with respect to the production cost of CORE in 
Korea during the POR.\2\ For a history of events that occurred since 
the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ On 
November 19, 2018, Commerce postponed the final results of this review 
until February 6, 2019.\4\ As a result of the partial government 
shutdown, the deadline for the final results of this review was revised 
to March 18, 2019.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of 
Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 39666 (August 10, 2018) (Preliminary 
Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Commerce February 7, 2019 Memorandum re: Post-
Preliminary Decision Memorandum on Particular Market Situation 
Allegation (PMS Memorandum).
    \3\ See Memorandum re: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea; 2016-
2017 (Issues and Decision Memorandum, or IDM), dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
    \4\ See Commerce November 19, 2018 Memorandum re: Extension of 
Deadline for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2016-2017.
    \5\ See Commerce January 28, 2019 Memorandum re: Deadlines 
Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government. All 
deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by the partial 
federal government closure have been extended by 40 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are certain corrosion-resistant 
steel products. For a complete description of the scope of this order, 
see attachment to the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties are 
addressed in the IDM, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The 
issues are identified in the Appendix to this notice. The IDM is a 
public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room

[[Page 10785]]

B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of 
the IDM can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 
The signed IDM and the electronic versions of the IDM are identical in 
content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties, we made certain revisions to the preliminary margin 
calculations for Dongkuk and Hyundai.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Dongkuk's and Hyundai's Final Calculation Memorandum, 
dated March 18, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    We have determined the following weighted-average dumping margins 
for the exporters or producers listed below for the POR: \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For POSCO and Dongbu Steel Co, Ltd. which were not selected 
for individual review, we assign a rate based on the rates for the 
respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding 
rates that are zero, de minimis or based entirely on facts 
available. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Exporter/producer                     dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.............................            7.33
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd...................................            7.33
Hyundai Steel Company...................................            0.00
POSCO...................................................            7.33
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, 
and U.S. Customs and Border Protections (CBP) shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance 
with the final results of this review. We will calculate importer-
specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount 
of antidumping duties calculated for each importer's examined sales and 
the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1).
    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each 
respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for 
the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue 
liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final 
results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 
the respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final 
results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by 
manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review 
but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is 
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original 
investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to 
be 8.31 percent, the all-others cash deposit rate established in the 
investigation.\8\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, 
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and 
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for 
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25, 
2016), as amended by Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 
the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with 
Final Determination of Investigation and Notice of Amended Final 
Results, 83 FR 39054 (August 8, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled 
antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: March 19, 2019.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final IDM

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Discussion of the Comments
General Comment
    Comment 1: Whether a Cost-Based Particular Market Situation 
Exists in Korea
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk) Comments
    Comment 2: Whether Dongkuk is Affiliated with POSCO
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available 
(AFA) to Dongkuk Because it Failed to Report Certain Information 
Related to POSCO
    Comment 4: Whether to Adjust the Price of Dongkuk's Purchases 
from JFE Steel Corporation
    Comment 5: Whether to Apply AFA to Freight Provided by Dongkuk's 
Affiliated Provider
    Comment 6: Whether to Grant a Constructed Export Price (CEP) 
Offset to Dongkuk
Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) Comments
    Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total AFA to Hyundai
    Comment 8: Whether Hyundai Overallocated U.S. Price to the CORE 
Input of its Sales of After-Service Auto Parts
    Comment 9: Whether Hyundai Withheld CONNUM-Specific Costs and 
Submitted Aberrational Cost Data
    Comment 10: Whether Hyundai Withheld Other Information Requested 
by Commerce
    Comment 11: Whether a Close Supplier Relationship Exists between 
Hyundai's Captive, Intermediate Processors and the Hyundai Group, 
Thereby Creating Artificial U.S. Prices
    Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Apply Partial 
AFA to Hyundai
    Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Use Hyundai's Manufacturer 
Variable
    Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Grant a CEP Offset to 
Hyundai
    Comment 15: Whether Commerce Should Use Hyundai's Customer-
Specific Warranty Expenses

[[Page 10786]]

VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2019-05523 Filed 3-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.