Assessment of Fees, 10270-10274 [2019-05128]
Download as PDF
10270
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Theresa V. Clark,
Deputy Director, Division of Rulemaking,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2019–05261 Filed 3–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 8
[Docket No. OCC–2018–0039]
RIN 1557–AE58
Assessment of Fees
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC) proposes to
revise its assessment rules to provide
partial assessment refunds to national
banks, Federal savings associations, and
Federal branches and agencies of foreign
banks (collectively, banks under OCC
jurisdiction) that exit OCC jurisdiction
within the first half of each six-month
period beginning the day after the date
of the second or fourth quarterly
Consolidated Report of Condition and
Income (Call Report). The proposed rule
would not change the current dates of
collection for assessments nor would it
change the way in which assessments
are calculated for banks that remain
under the OCC’s supervision. The
proposed rule would also make
technical changes to the assessments
rules.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 19, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to the OCC by any of the methods set
forth below. Commenters are
encouraged to submit comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or email, if possible. Please use the title
‘‘Assessment of Fees’’ to facilitate the
organization and distribution of the
comments. You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal—
‘‘Regulations.gov’’: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter ‘‘Docket ID
OCC–2018–0039’’ in the Search Box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on ‘‘Comment
Now’’ to submit public comments. Click
on the ‘‘Help’’ tab on the
Regulations.gov home page to get
information on using Regulations.gov,
including instructions for submitting
public comments.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Mar 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
• Email: regs.comments@
occ.treas.gov.
• Mail: Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
Street SW, Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th
Street SW, Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
• Fax: (571) 465–4326.
Instructions: You must include
‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘Docket
ID OCC–2018–0039’’ in your comment.
In general, the OCC will enter all
comments received into the docket and
publish the comments on the
Regulations.gov website without
change, including any business or
personal information that you provide
such as name and address information,
email addresses, or phone numbers.
Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure. Do not
include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other
related materials that pertain to this
rulemaking action by any of the
following methods:
• Viewing Comments Electronically:
Go to www.regulations.gov. Enter
‘‘Docket ID OCC–2018–0039’’ in the
Search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ on the right side
of the screen. Comments and supporting
materials can be viewed and filtered by
clicking on ‘‘View all documents and
comments in this docket’’ and then
using the filtering tools on the left side
of the screen. Click on the ‘‘Help’’ tab
on the Regulations.gov home page to get
information on using Regulations.gov.
The docket may be viewed after the
close of the comment period in the same
manner as during the comment period.
• Viewing Comments Personally: You
may personally inspect comments at the
OCC, 400 7th Street SW, Washington,
DC 20219. For security reasons, the OCC
requires that visitors make an
appointment to inspect comments. You
may do so by calling (202) 649–6700 or,
for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, TTY, (202) 649–5597. Upon
arrival, visitors will be required to
present valid government-issued photo
identification and submit to security
screening in order to inspect comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Thomas, AT Team Lead,
Financial Management, (202) 649–5540;
or Mitchell Plave, Special Counsel,
Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 649–
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5490; or for persons who are deaf or
hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649–5597,
400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC
20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Bank Act 1 and the
Home Owners’ Loan Act 2 authorize the
Comptroller to fund the OCC’s
operations through assessments, fees,
and other charges on banks.3 In setting
assessments, the Comptroller has broad
authority to consider variations among
institutions, including the nature and
scope of the activities of the entity, the
amount and type of assets that the entity
holds, the financial and managerial
condition of the entity, and any other
factor the Comptroller determines is
appropriate.4
The OCC collects assessments from
banks in accordance with 12 CFR part
8. Under part 8, the base assessment for
banks is calculated using a table with
eleven categories, or brackets, each of
which comprises a range of asset-size
values. The assessment for each bank is
the sum of a base amount, which is the
same for every bank in its asset-size
bracket, plus a marginal amount, which
is computed by applying a marginal
assessment rate to the amount in excess
of the lower boundary of the asset-size
bracket.5 The marginal assessment rate
declines as asset size increases,
reflecting economies of scale in bank
examination and supervision.
The OCC’s annual Notice of Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency Fees
and Assessments (Notice of Fees) sets
forth the marginal assessment rates
applicable to each asset-size bracket for
each year, as well as other assessment
components and fees. Under part 8, the
OCC may adjust the marginal rates to
account for inflation through the annual
Notice of Fees.6 The OCC also has the
discretion under part 8 to adjust
marginal rates by amounts other than
inflation.7 The OCC may issue an
interim or amended Notice of Fees if the
Comptroller determines that it is
1 Revised Statutes of the United States, Title LXII,
12 U.S.C. 1 et seq.
2 The Home Owners’ Loan Act, 12 U.S.C. 1461 et
seq.
3 12 U.S.C. 16, 481, 482, 1467.
4 12 U.S.C. 16. See also 12 U.S.C. 1467 (providing
that the Comptroller has the authority to recover
costs of examination of Federal savings associations
‘‘as the Comptroller deems necessary or
appropriate’’).
5 12 CFR 8.2(a). Only the total domestic assets of
Federal branches and agencies are subject to
assessment. 12 CFR 8.2(b)(2).
6 12 CFR 8.2(a)(4).
7 Id.
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
necessary to revise assessments to meet
the OCC’s supervisory obligations.8
Under 12 CFR 8.2, the OCC collects
assessments on a semiannual basis, with
fees due by March 31 and September 30
of each year for the six-month period
beginning on January 1 and July 1 before
each payment date.9 Under this
schedule, banks pay half of the
semiannual assessment prospectively
and half retrospectively. This schedule
for collection of assessments was
adopted in 2005, when the OCC issued
a rule to streamline the assessments
billing process.10 Between 1976, when
the OCC adopted the marginal
assessments structure, and 2005, the
OCC collected assessments
prospectively for five months and
retrospectively for one month.11
Under 12 CFR 8.2(a)(5) and (b)(3),
each bank subject to the jurisdiction of
the OCC on the date of the second or
fourth quarterly Call Report is subject to
the full assessment for the next sixmonth period. As noted in the Notice of
Fees for 2018,12 only those institutions
leaving OCC jurisdiction before the
close of business on those dates avoid
paying the semiannual assessment for
the period beginning January 1 or July
1, as applicable.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Proposed Changes
Assessment Refunds
Under the current assessments
structure, banks that are subject to the
jurisdiction of the OCC on the last day
of the six-month period ending on
December 31 or June 30 are subject to
the full assessment for the next sixmonth period beginning January 1 or
July 1, with payment due March 31 or
September 30, as appropriate.13 Under
the proposed rule, banks that leave OCC
jurisdiction by the appropriate payment
due date would receive a refund of
assessments for the second three months
of the semiannual assessment period.
For example, a bank that was subject to
the jurisdiction of the OCC as of
December 31 would receive a refund of
assessments for the second three months
of the semiannual assessment period
beginning January 1 if it leaves OCC
jurisdiction by March 31.
The proposed rule is intended to
eliminate the requirement that banks
prospectively pay for one half of each
assessment period after they no longer
are subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC
8 12
CFR 8.8(b).
CFR 8.2(a) and 8.2(b).
10 70 FR 69641 (Nov. 17, 2005).
11 41 FR 3285 (Jan. 22, 1976).
12 See OCC Bulletin 2017–60 (Office the
Comptroller of the Currency Fees and Assessments).
13 12 CFR 8.2(a) and 8.2(b).
9 12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Mar 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
by setting the refund equal to the
prospective portion of the assessment.
Under the current rule, the payment due
date effectively divides each six-month
period into two three-month periods,
and a bank subject to the jurisdiction of
the OCC on the date of the applicable
Call Report (December 31 or June 30)
must pay the full assessment on the
payment due date of the semiannual
assessment (March 31 and September
30) even if it has left OCC jurisdiction
by that date. This structure can result in
banks prospectively paying assessment
fees for three-month periods during
which they are not subject to the
jurisdiction of the OCC at any time. The
proposed rule would maintain
semiannual payments, but provide
refunds equal to the prospective half of
the assessment to banks that leave the
jurisdiction of the OCC between the date
of the applicable Call Report and the
date of collection. In doing so, the
proposed rule would assess a bank to
cover only any three-month period
during which it was subject to the
jurisdiction of the OCC.
Technical and Conforming
Amendments
The proposed rule also includes
technical and conforming amendments.
These are intended to reduce ambiguity
and further consistent terminology
throughout 12 CFR part 8. The first
change would amend §§ 8.5(d) and
8.6(c)(1)(iii) concerning the condition
surcharge to replace the phrase ‘‘at its
most recent examination’’ with the
phrase ‘‘prior to December 31 or June
30, as appropriate.’’ This change would
clarify that the condition surcharge is
calculated in tandem with the OCC’s
calculation of other assessment
components based on Call Report
information as of December 31 and June
30 of each year.14 This amendment to
the rule would not change the OCC’s
current practice of calculating a bank’s
surcharge as of its most recent ratings
prior to December 31 and June 30, as
appropriate. Under this policy,
surcharges are neither raised nor
lowered between December 31 and June
30, as appropriate, and the collection
dates of March 31 and September 30, as
appropriate.
The second change would make
several revisions to 12 CFR 8.7
concerning interest on delinquent
assessments and fees and refunds in the
case of an error or miscalculation of
assessments or fees. First, it would add
the prefatory clause, ‘‘Within 30
14 See OCC Bulletin 2017–60 (Office the
Comptroller of the Currency Fees and Assessments)
(describing the process for calculating assessments).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10271
calendar days of receipt of such notice,
the OCC shall either—’’ at § 8.7(b)(1).
This clause was originally included at
§ 8.7(b) as introductory text and was
inadvertently deleted in connection
with a prior rulemaking. Restoring it
would clarify the OCC’s obligations
under § 8.7(b). This change would also
redesignate the current § 8.7(b)(1) and
(2) as § 8.7(b)(1)(i) and (ii), respectively.
In addition, the proposed rule would
redesignate the current § 8.7(b)
concluding text as § 8.7(b)(2). Finally,
the proposed rule would simplify the
language used in § 8.7(a) and (b) and
clarify that provisions dealing with
special examination or investigation
fees apply to any institution subject to
such an exam or investigation. These
amendments would not change the
OCC’s current policy of considering
assessment payments delinquent if
received after the time for payment
specified in 12 CFR 8.2; considering
special examination and investigation
fees delinquent if not received within 30
calendar days of the invoice date;
requiring interest on delinquent
payments and fees; and providing either
a refund or notice of its unwillingness
to accept a refund request within 30
calendar days of receipt of a request.
The proposed rule would also
conform all references to the ‘‘Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency,’’
‘‘Comptroller of the Currency,’’ or
‘‘Office’’ to ‘‘OCC,’’ except with respect
to references to the Notice of Fees;
conform all references to ‘‘Notice of
Comptroller of the Currency Fees’’ or
‘‘Notice of Comptroller of the Currency
of Fees’’ to ‘‘Notice of Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency Fees and
Assessments’’; add hyphens to all
compound modifiers where a hyphen is
not currently used; remove references to
‘‘Thrift Financial Reports,’’ which are
no longer used; remove a duplicate
reference to ‘‘Uniform Financial
Institutions Rating System’’ in 12 CFR
8.6(c)(1)(iii); remove a duplicate and
unnecessary citation to authority in 12
CFR 8.6(a); replace an incorrect
reference to ‘‘each national bank’’ with
a reference to ‘‘each Federal branch and
agency’’ in 12 CFR 8.2(b)(1); add the
modifier ‘‘national’’ to references to
banks and terms, such as ‘‘independent
credit card banks,’’ as appropriate; add
the term ‘‘independent trust’’ before
references to banks and Federal savings
associations in 12 CFR 8.6(c)(1)(iii) and
add a reference to independent trust
Federal savings associations where the
provision currently only refers to banks;
and add conforming references to
Federal branches and agencies, as
necessary.
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
10272
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Analysis
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) the OCC may not conduct
or sponsor, and an organization is not
required to respond to, an information
collection unless the information
collection displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. This notice of
proposed rulemaking does not contain a
collection of information under the
PRA.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In general, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
that in connection with a rulemaking,
an agency prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory
flexibility analysis that describes the
impact of the rule on small entities.
Under section 605(b) of the RFA, this
analysis is not required if an agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities and
publishes its certification and a brief
explanatory statement in the Federal
Register along with its rule.
The OCC currently supervises
approximately 886 small entities.15
Although the number of OCCsupervised small banks affected will
vary each year, the OCC does not expect
that the proposed rule, if adopted as
final, would affect a substantial number
(generally defined as five percent or
more of OCC-supervised small entities)
in any given year, based on the OCC’s
experience with departures from the
charters in recent years. For example,
had the proposed rule applied in 2018,
the OCC would have refunded
assessments totaling $579,000 to 22
banks, 19 of which were small banks
(approximately two percent of OCCsupervised small entities). Similarly, if
the proposed rule had applied in 2017,
the OCC would have refunded
assessments totaling $663,000 to 16
banks, 12 of which were small banks; in
2016, the OCC would have refunded
assessments totaling $392,000 to 26
15 The OCC bases its estimate of the number of
small entities on the SBA’s size thresholds for
commercial banks and savings institutions, and
trust companies, which are $550 million and $38.5
million, respectively. Consistent with the General
Principles of Affiliation in 13 CFR 121.103(a), the
OCC counts the assets of affiliated financial
institutions when determining if we should classify
an OCC-supervised institution as a small entity. The
OCC uses December 31, 2017, to represent size
because a ‘‘financial institution’s assets are
determined by averaging the assets reported on its
four quarterly financial statements for the preceding
year.’’ See footnote 8 of the U.S. Small Business
Administration’s Table of Size Standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Mar 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
banks, all of which were small banks;
and in 2015, the OCC would have
refunded assessments totaling $555,000
to 29 banks, 27 of which were small
banks. In each of these years, the
number of institutions that would have
been affected by the proposed rule was
less than five percent of OCC-supervised
small entities. Therefore, the proposed
rule would not have affected a
substantial number of small entities
during these years.
The OCC also considered whether the
proposed rule would result in a
significant economic impact on small
entities. In general, the OCC classifies
the economic impact of expected cost
(or benefit) to comply with a rule on an
individual bank as significant if the total
estimated monetized costs (or benefits)
in one year are greater than 5 percent of
the bank’s total annual salaries and
benefits or 2.5 percent of the bank’s total
annual non-interest expense. Based on
the above criteria, and the refund
amounts for the years 2015 through
2018 outlined above, the OCC estimates
that impact of the proposed rule, had it
been in place for 2015–2018, would not
have had a significant economic impact
at any of the affected institutions.
Based on the data and experience of
the OCC in recent years with departures
from the charters, the OCC certifies that
the proposed rule, if adopted as final,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The OCC analyzed the proposed rule
under the factors set forth in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1532). Under this
analysis, the OCC considered whether
the proposed rule includes a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year (adjusted for inflation).
The OCC has determined that the
proposed rule, if adopted as final,
would not impose new mandates and,
therefore, would not result in the
expenditure of $100 million or more
annually by state, local, and tribal
governments, or by the private sector.
Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
The Riegle Community Development
and Regulatory Improvement Act of
1994 (RCDRIA) requires that each
Federal banking agency, in determining
the effective date and administrative
compliance requirements for new
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosure, or other
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements on insured depository
institutions (IDIs), consider, consistent
with principles of safety and soundness
and the public interest, any
administrative burdens that such
regulations would place on depository
institutions, including small depository
institutions, and customers of
depository institutions, as well as the
benefits of such regulations.16 In
addition, new regulations and
amendments to regulations that impose
additional reporting, disclosures, or
other new requirements on IDIs
generally must take effect on the first
day of a calendar quarter that begins on
or after the date on which the
regulations are published in final
form.17
Because the proposal would not
impose additional reporting, disclosure,
or other requirements on banks, section
302 of the RCDRIA does not apply.
Nevertheless, the requirements of
RCDRIA will be considered as part of
the overall rulemaking process. In
addition, the OCC invites comments
that will inform the OCC’s consideration
of RCDRIA.
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act requires the OCC to use plain
language in all proposed and final rules
published after January 1, 2000. The
OCC invites comment on how to make
this proposed rule easier to understand.
For example:
• Has the OCC organized the material
to inform your needs? If not, how could
the OCC present the proposed rule more
clearly?
• Are the requirements in the
proposed rule clearly stated? If not, how
could the proposal be more clearly
stated?
• Does the proposed regulation
contain technical language or jargon that
is not clear? If so, which language
requires clarification?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the proposed
regulation easier to understand? If so,
what changes would achieve that?
• Is this section format adequate? If
not, which of the sections should be
changed and how?
• What other changes can the OCC
incorporate to make the proposed
regulation easier to understand?
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 8
Assessments, Federal branches and
agencies, National banks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Savings
associations.
16 12
17 12
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
U.S.C. 4802(a).
U.S.C. 4802(b).
20MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, chapter I of title 12 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 8—ASSESSMENT OF FEES
1. The authority for part 8 continues
to read as follows:
■
§ 8.2
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 16, 93a, 481, 482,
1467, 1831c, 1867, 3102, 3108, and
5412(b)(2)(B); and 15 U.S.C. 78c and 78l.
2. Section 8.2 is amended by:
a. Removing ‘‘non-lead bank’’
wherever it appears and adding ‘‘nonlead national bank’’ in its place;
■ b. Removing ‘‘lead bank’’ wherever it
appears and adding ‘‘lead national
bank’’ in its place;
■ c. Removing ‘‘independent credit card
bank’’ wherever it appears and adding
‘‘independent credit card national
bank’’ in its place;
■ d. Removing ‘‘independent credit card
banks’’ wherever it appears and adding
‘‘independent credit card national
banks’’ in its place;
■ e. Removing ‘‘the bank’s’’ and by
adding ‘‘the national bank’s’’ in its place
in paragraphs (a) introductory text,
(a)(3), (c)(3)(iii), and (c)(3)(viii);
■ f. Removing ‘‘A bank’s’’ and adding
‘‘A national bank’’ in its place in
paragraph (a)(1);
■ g. Removing ‘‘the bank’’ and adding
‘‘the national bank’’ in its place in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) and (c)(1)
and (2);
■ h. Removing ‘‘Comptroller of the
Currency’’ and adding ‘‘OCC’’ in its
place in paragraphs (a) introductory text
and (b)(1);
■ i. Removing ‘‘Notice of Comptroller of
the Currency Fees’’ and adding ‘‘Notice
of Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments’’ in its
place in paragraphs (a)(6)(i) and (b)(4)(i);
■ j. Removing ‘‘Federal branch or
agency’’ and adding ‘‘Federal branch
and agency’’ in its place in paragraph
(b)(4)(i);
■ k. Removing ‘‘each bank’s’’ and
adding ‘‘each national bank’s’’ in its
place in paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(A);
■ l. Removing ‘‘or Thrift Financial
Report, as appropriate,’’ in paragraph
(a)(6)(ii)(A);
■ m. Removing ‘‘six month’’ and adding
‘‘six-month’’ in its place in paragraph
(b)(1);
■ n. Removing ‘‘national bank’’ and
adding ‘‘Federal branch and agency’’ in
its place in paragraph (b)(1);
■ o. Removing ‘‘Notice of Comptroller of
the Currency of Fees’’ and adding
‘‘Notice of Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency Fees and Assessments’’ in
its place in paragraph (c)(1);
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Mar 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
p. Removing ‘‘full service’’ and adding
‘‘full-service’’ in its place in paragraph
(c)(2);
■ q. Removing ‘‘or a bank’’ and adding
‘‘or a national bank’’ in its place in
paragraph (c)(3)(iii); and
■ r. Revising paragraphs (a)(5), (b)(3),
and (d).
The revisions read as follows:
■
Semiannual assessment.
(a) * * *
(5) The specific marginal rates and
complete assessment schedule will be
published in the ‘‘Notice of Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency Fees and
Assessments,’’ provided for at § 8.8.
Each semiannual assessment is based
upon the total assets shown in the
national bank’s or Federal savings
association’s most recent ‘‘Consolidated
Reports of Condition and Income’’ (Call
Report) preceding the payment date.
Each national bank or Federal savings
association subject to the jurisdiction of
the OCC on the date of the second or
fourth quarterly Call Report as
appropriate, required by the OCC under
12 U.S.C. 161 and 12 U.S.C. 1464(v), is
subject to the full assessment for the
next six-month period. National banks
and Federal savings associations that are
no longer subject to the jurisdiction of
the OCC as of the date of the second or
fourth quarterly Call Report, as
appropriate, will receive a refund of
assessments for the second three months
of the semiannual assessment period.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Each semiannual assessment of
each Federal branch and each agency is
based upon the total assets shown in the
Federal branch’s or agency’s Call Report
most recently preceding the payment
date. Each Federal branch or agency
subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC on
the date of the second and fourth Call
Reports is subject to the full assessment
for the next six-month period. Federal
branches and agencies that are no longer
subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC as
of the date of the second or fourth
quarterly Call Report, as appropriate,
will receive a refund of assessments for
the second three months of the
semiannual assessment period.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Surcharge based on the condition
of the national bank, Federal savings
association, or Federal branch or
agency. Subject to any limit that the
OCC prescribes in the ‘‘Notice of Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency Fees
and Assessments,’’ the OCC shall apply
a surcharge to the semiannual
assessment computed in accordance
with paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10273
section. This surcharge will be
determined by multiplying the
semiannual assessment computed in
accordance with paragraphs (a) through
(c) of this section by—
(1) 1.5, in the case of any national
bank or Federal savings association that
receives a composite rating of 3 under
the Uniform Financial Institutions
Rating System (UFIRS) and any Federal
branch or agency that receives a
composite rating of 3 under the ROCA
rating system (which rates risk
management, operational controls,
compliance, and asset quality) at its
most recent examination prior to
December 31 or June 30, as appropriate;
and
(2) 2.0, in the case of any national
bank or Federal savings association that
receives a composite UFIRS rating of 4
or 5 and any Federal branch or agency
that receives a composite rating of 4 or
5 under the ROCA rating system at its
most recent examination prior to
December 31 or June 30, as appropriate.
■ 3. Section 8.6 is amended by:
■ a. Removing ‘‘Notice of Comptroller of
the Currency Fees’’ and adding ‘‘Notice
of Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments’’ in its
place in paragraphs (b), (c)(1)(i) and (ii),
and (c)(3)(vii);
■ b. Removing ‘‘independent trust
banks’’ wherever it appears and adding
‘‘independent trust national banks’’ in
its place;
■ c. Removing ‘‘independent trust
bank’’ wherever it appears and adding
‘‘Independent trust national bank’’ in its
place;
■ d. Removing ‘‘trust bank’’ wherever it
appears and adding ‘‘trust national
bank’’ in its place;
■ e. Removing ‘‘trust banks’’ wherever it
appears and adding ‘‘trust national
banks’’ in its place;
■ f. Removing ‘‘the bank’’ and adding
‘‘the national bank’’ in its place in
paragraph (c)(2); and
■ g. Revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text, (a)(1) and (3), and
(c)(1)(iii).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 8.6 Fees for special examinations and
investigations.
(a) Fees. The OCC may assess a fee for:
(1) Examining the fiduciary activities
of national banks, Federal branches of
foreign banks, and Federal savings
associations and related entities;
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Conducting special examinations
and investigations of an entity with
respect to its performance of activities
described in section 7(c) of the Bank
Service Company Act (12 U.S.C.
1867(c)) if the OCC determines that
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
10274
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
assessment of the fee is warranted with
regard to a particular national bank,
Federal branch or agency of a foreign
bank, or Federal savings association
because of the high risk or unusual
nature of the activities performed; the
significance to the national bank’s,
Federal branch’s or agency’s, or Federal
saving association’s operations and
income of the activities performed; or
the extent to which the national bank,
Federal branch or agency, or Federal
savings association has sufficient
systems, controls, and personnel to
adequately monitor, measure, and
control risks arising from such
activities;
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * (1) * * *
(iii) Surcharge based on the condition
of the independent trust national bank
or of the independent trust Federal
savings association. Subject to any limit
that the OCC prescribes in the ‘‘Notice
of Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments,’’ the
OCC shall adjust the semiannual
assessment computed in accordance
with paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section by multiplying that figure by 1.5
for each independent trust national
bank and independent trust Federal
savings association that receives a
composite UFIRS rating of 3 at its most
recent examination prior to December
31 or June 30, as appropriate, and by 2.0
for each independent trust national
bank and independent trust Federal
savings association that receives a
composite UFIRS rating of 4 or 5 at such
examination.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 8.7 is amended by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 8.7 Payment of interest on delinquent
assessments and examination and
investigation fees.
(a) Each national bank, Federal
savings association, Federal branch, and
Federal agency shall pay to the OCC
interest on its delinquent payments of
semiannual assessments. In addition,
each institution subject to a special
examination or investigation fee shall
pay to the OCC interest on its
delinquent payments of special
examination and investigation fees.
Semiannual assessment payments will
be considered delinquent if they are
received after the time for payment
specified in § 8.2. Special examination
and investigation fees will be
considered delinquent if not received by
the OCC within 30 calendar days of the
invoice date.
(b) In the event that an institution
believes that the notice of assessments
or special examination and investigation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Mar 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
fees contains an error or miscalculation,
the institution may provide the OCC
with a written request for a revised
notice and a refund of any
overpayments. Any such request for a
revised notice and refund must be made
after timely payment of the semiannual
assessment under the dates specified in
§ 8.2 or timely payment of the special
examination and investigation fee
within 30 calendar days of the invoice
date.
(1) Within 30 calendar days of receipt
of such notice, the OCC shall either—
(i) Refund the amount of the
overpayment; or
(ii) Provide notice of its unwillingness
to accept the request for a revised notice
of assessments. In the latter instance,
the OCC and the entity claiming the
overpayment shall thereafter attempt to
reach agreement on the amount, if any,
to be refunded; the OCC shall refund
this amount within 30 calendar days of
such agreement.
(2) The OCC shall be considered
delinquent if it fails to return an
overpayment in accordance with the
time limitations specified in this
paragraph (b). The OCC shall pay
interest on any such delinquent
payments.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 8.8 is amended by revising
the section heading and paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 8.8 Notice of Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency fees and assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Interim and amended notice of
fees. The OCC may issue a ‘‘Notice of
Interim Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments’’ or a
‘‘Notice of Amended Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency Fees and
Assessments’’ from time to time
throughout the year as necessary.
Interim or amended notices will be
effective 30 days after issuance.
Dated: March 13, 2019.
Joseph M. Otting,
Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2019–05128 Filed 3–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 301
[REG–104352–18]
RIN 1545–BO53
Rules Regarding Certain Hybrid
Arrangements; Hearing Cancellation
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public
hearing on proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document cancels a
public hearing on proposed regulations
to implement sections of the Internal
Revenue Code regarding hybrid
dividends and certain amounts paid or
accrued in hybrid transactions or with
hybrid entities, and to provide rules
under the Code to prevent the same
deduction from being claimed under the
tax laws of both the United States and
a foreign country.
DATES: The public hearing, originally
scheduled for March 20, 2019 at 10 a.m.
is cancelled.
ADDRESSES: The cancelled hearing was
originally scheduled to be held at the
Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Johnson, Publications and
Regulations Specialist at (202) 317–6901
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice
of proposed rulemaking and notice of
public hearing that appeared in the
Federal Register on Friday, March 8,
2019 (8 FR 8488) announced that a
public hearing was scheduled March 20,
2019 at 10 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium,
Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC. The subject of the public hearing is
under sections 245, 267, 1503, and 7701
of the Internal Revenue Code.
This document cancels a public
hearing on proposed regulations to
implement sections 245A(e) and 267A
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)
rules regarding hybrid dividends and
certain amounts paid or accrued in
hybrid transactions or with hybrid
entities, and to provide rules under
sections 1503(d) and 7701 of the Code
to prevent the same deduction from
being claimed under the tax laws of
both the United States and a foreign
country. The public comment period for
these regulations expired on March 15,
2019.
The notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of hearing instructed those
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 20, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10270-10274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05128]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Part 8
[Docket No. OCC-2018-0039]
RIN 1557-AE58
Assessment of Fees
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) proposes
to revise its assessment rules to provide partial assessment refunds to
national banks, Federal savings associations, and Federal branches and
agencies of foreign banks (collectively, banks under OCC jurisdiction)
that exit OCC jurisdiction within the first half of each six-month
period beginning the day after the date of the second or fourth
quarterly Consolidated Report of Condition and Income (Call Report).
The proposed rule would not change the current dates of collection for
assessments nor would it change the way in which assessments are
calculated for banks that remain under the OCC's supervision. The
proposed rule would also make technical changes to the assessments
rules.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 19, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the OCC by any of the methods set
forth below. Commenters are encouraged to submit comments through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal or email, if possible. Please use the title
``Assessment of Fees'' to facilitate the organization and distribution
of the comments. You may submit comments by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal--``Regulations.gov'': Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter ``Docket ID OCC-2018-0039'' in the Search
Box and click ``Search.'' Click on ``Comment Now'' to submit public
comments. Click on the ``Help'' tab on the Regulations.gov home page to
get information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
submitting public comments.
Email: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov.
Mail: Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E-
218, Washington, DC 20219.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E-218,
Washington, DC 20219.
Fax: (571) 465-4326.
Instructions: You must include ``OCC'' as the agency name and
``Docket ID OCC-2018-0039'' in your comment. In general, the OCC will
enter all comments received into the docket and publish the comments on
the Regulations.gov website without change, including any business or
personal information that you provide such as name and address
information, email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received,
including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the
public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not include any
information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other related materials that pertain to
this rulemaking action by any of the following methods:
Viewing Comments Electronically: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter ``Docket ID OCC-2018-0039'' in the Search
box and click ``Search.'' Click on ``Open Docket Folder'' on the right
side of the screen. Comments and supporting materials can be viewed and
filtered by clicking on ``View all documents and comments in this
docket'' and then using the filtering tools on the left side of the
screen. Click on the ``Help'' tab on the Regulations.gov home page to
get information on using Regulations.gov. The docket may be viewed
after the close of the comment period in the same manner as during the
comment period.
Viewing Comments Personally: You may personally inspect
comments at the OCC, 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. For
security reasons, the OCC requires that visitors make an appointment to
inspect comments. You may do so by calling (202) 649-6700 or, for
persons who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649-5597. Upon
arrival, visitors will be required to present valid government-issued
photo identification and submit to security screening in order to
inspect comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Thomas, AT Team Lead,
Financial Management, (202) 649-5540; or Mitchell Plave, Special
Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 649-5490; or for persons
who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649-5597, 400 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Bank Act \1\ and the Home Owners' Loan Act \2\
authorize the Comptroller to fund the OCC's operations through
assessments, fees, and other charges on banks.\3\ In setting
assessments, the Comptroller has broad authority to consider variations
among institutions, including the nature and scope of the activities of
the entity, the amount and type of assets that the entity holds, the
financial and managerial condition of the entity, and any other factor
the Comptroller determines is appropriate.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Revised Statutes of the United States, Title LXII, 12 U.S.C.
1 et seq.
\2\ The Home Owners' Loan Act, 12 U.S.C. 1461 et seq.
\3\ 12 U.S.C. 16, 481, 482, 1467.
\4\ 12 U.S.C. 16. See also 12 U.S.C. 1467 (providing that the
Comptroller has the authority to recover costs of examination of
Federal savings associations ``as the Comptroller deems necessary or
appropriate'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OCC collects assessments from banks in accordance with 12 CFR
part 8. Under part 8, the base assessment for banks is calculated using
a table with eleven categories, or brackets, each of which comprises a
range of asset-size values. The assessment for each bank is the sum of
a base amount, which is the same for every bank in its asset-size
bracket, plus a marginal amount, which is computed by applying a
marginal assessment rate to the amount in excess of the lower boundary
of the asset-size bracket.\5\ The marginal assessment rate declines as
asset size increases, reflecting economies of scale in bank examination
and supervision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 12 CFR 8.2(a). Only the total domestic assets of Federal
branches and agencies are subject to assessment. 12 CFR 8.2(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OCC's annual Notice of Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments (Notice of Fees) sets forth the marginal
assessment rates applicable to each asset-size bracket for each year,
as well as other assessment components and fees. Under part 8, the OCC
may adjust the marginal rates to account for inflation through the
annual Notice of Fees.\6\ The OCC also has the discretion under part 8
to adjust marginal rates by amounts other than inflation.\7\ The OCC
may issue an interim or amended Notice of Fees if the Comptroller
determines that it is
[[Page 10271]]
necessary to revise assessments to meet the OCC's supervisory
obligations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 12 CFR 8.2(a)(4).
\7\ Id.
\8\ 12 CFR 8.8(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 12 CFR 8.2, the OCC collects assessments on a semiannual
basis, with fees due by March 31 and September 30 of each year for the
six-month period beginning on January 1 and July 1 before each payment
date.\9\ Under this schedule, banks pay half of the semiannual
assessment prospectively and half retrospectively. This schedule for
collection of assessments was adopted in 2005, when the OCC issued a
rule to streamline the assessments billing process.\10\ Between 1976,
when the OCC adopted the marginal assessments structure, and 2005, the
OCC collected assessments prospectively for five months and
retrospectively for one month.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 12 CFR 8.2(a) and 8.2(b).
\10\ 70 FR 69641 (Nov. 17, 2005).
\11\ 41 FR 3285 (Jan. 22, 1976).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 12 CFR 8.2(a)(5) and (b)(3), each bank subject to the
jurisdiction of the OCC on the date of the second or fourth quarterly
Call Report is subject to the full assessment for the next six-month
period. As noted in the Notice of Fees for 2018,\12\ only those
institutions leaving OCC jurisdiction before the close of business on
those dates avoid paying the semiannual assessment for the period
beginning January 1 or July 1, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See OCC Bulletin 2017-60 (Office the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Proposed Changes
Assessment Refunds
Under the current assessments structure, banks that are subject to
the jurisdiction of the OCC on the last day of the six-month period
ending on December 31 or June 30 are subject to the full assessment for
the next six-month period beginning January 1 or July 1, with payment
due March 31 or September 30, as appropriate.\13\ Under the proposed
rule, banks that leave OCC jurisdiction by the appropriate payment due
date would receive a refund of assessments for the second three months
of the semiannual assessment period. For example, a bank that was
subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC as of December 31 would receive
a refund of assessments for the second three months of the semiannual
assessment period beginning January 1 if it leaves OCC jurisdiction by
March 31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 12 CFR 8.2(a) and 8.2(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule is intended to eliminate the requirement that
banks prospectively pay for one half of each assessment period after
they no longer are subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC by setting
the refund equal to the prospective portion of the assessment. Under
the current rule, the payment due date effectively divides each six-
month period into two three-month periods, and a bank subject to the
jurisdiction of the OCC on the date of the applicable Call Report
(December 31 or June 30) must pay the full assessment on the payment
due date of the semiannual assessment (March 31 and September 30) even
if it has left OCC jurisdiction by that date. This structure can result
in banks prospectively paying assessment fees for three-month periods
during which they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC at any
time. The proposed rule would maintain semiannual payments, but provide
refunds equal to the prospective half of the assessment to banks that
leave the jurisdiction of the OCC between the date of the applicable
Call Report and the date of collection. In doing so, the proposed rule
would assess a bank to cover only any three-month period during which
it was subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC.
Technical and Conforming Amendments
The proposed rule also includes technical and conforming
amendments. These are intended to reduce ambiguity and further
consistent terminology throughout 12 CFR part 8. The first change would
amend Sec. Sec. 8.5(d) and 8.6(c)(1)(iii) concerning the condition
surcharge to replace the phrase ``at its most recent examination'' with
the phrase ``prior to December 31 or June 30, as appropriate.'' This
change would clarify that the condition surcharge is calculated in
tandem with the OCC's calculation of other assessment components based
on Call Report information as of December 31 and June 30 of each
year.\14\ This amendment to the rule would not change the OCC's current
practice of calculating a bank's surcharge as of its most recent
ratings prior to December 31 and June 30, as appropriate. Under this
policy, surcharges are neither raised nor lowered between December 31
and June 30, as appropriate, and the collection dates of March 31 and
September 30, as appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See OCC Bulletin 2017-60 (Office the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments) (describing the process for
calculating assessments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second change would make several revisions to 12 CFR 8.7
concerning interest on delinquent assessments and fees and refunds in
the case of an error or miscalculation of assessments or fees. First,
it would add the prefatory clause, ``Within 30 calendar days of receipt
of such notice, the OCC shall either--'' at Sec. 8.7(b)(1). This
clause was originally included at Sec. 8.7(b) as introductory text and
was inadvertently deleted in connection with a prior rulemaking.
Restoring it would clarify the OCC's obligations under Sec. 8.7(b).
This change would also redesignate the current Sec. 8.7(b)(1) and (2)
as Sec. 8.7(b)(1)(i) and (ii), respectively. In addition, the proposed
rule would redesignate the current Sec. 8.7(b) concluding text as
Sec. 8.7(b)(2). Finally, the proposed rule would simplify the language
used in Sec. 8.7(a) and (b) and clarify that provisions dealing with
special examination or investigation fees apply to any institution
subject to such an exam or investigation. These amendments would not
change the OCC's current policy of considering assessment payments
delinquent if received after the time for payment specified in 12 CFR
8.2; considering special examination and investigation fees delinquent
if not received within 30 calendar days of the invoice date; requiring
interest on delinquent payments and fees; and providing either a refund
or notice of its unwillingness to accept a refund request within 30
calendar days of receipt of a request.
The proposed rule would also conform all references to the ``Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency,'' ``Comptroller of the Currency,''
or ``Office'' to ``OCC,'' except with respect to references to the
Notice of Fees; conform all references to ``Notice of Comptroller of
the Currency Fees'' or ``Notice of Comptroller of the Currency of
Fees'' to ``Notice of Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Fees
and Assessments''; add hyphens to all compound modifiers where a hyphen
is not currently used; remove references to ``Thrift Financial
Reports,'' which are no longer used; remove a duplicate reference to
``Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System'' in 12 CFR
8.6(c)(1)(iii); remove a duplicate and unnecessary citation to
authority in 12 CFR 8.6(a); replace an incorrect reference to ``each
national bank'' with a reference to ``each Federal branch and agency''
in 12 CFR 8.2(b)(1); add the modifier ``national'' to references to
banks and terms, such as ``independent credit card banks,'' as
appropriate; add the term ``independent trust'' before references to
banks and Federal savings associations in 12 CFR 8.6(c)(1)(iii) and add
a reference to independent trust Federal savings associations where the
provision currently only refers to banks; and add conforming references
to Federal branches and agencies, as necessary.
[[Page 10272]]
Regulatory Analysis
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the OCC may not conduct or sponsor, and an
organization is not required to respond to, an information collection
unless the information collection displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control number. This notice of proposed
rulemaking does not contain a collection of information under the PRA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In general, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) requires that in connection with a rulemaking, an agency prepare
and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis
that describes the impact of the rule on small entities. Under section
605(b) of the RFA, this analysis is not required if an agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities and publishes its certification
and a brief explanatory statement in the Federal Register along with
its rule.
The OCC currently supervises approximately 886 small entities.\15\
Although the number of OCC-supervised small banks affected will vary
each year, the OCC does not expect that the proposed rule, if adopted
as final, would affect a substantial number (generally defined as five
percent or more of OCC-supervised small entities) in any given year,
based on the OCC's experience with departures from the charters in
recent years. For example, had the proposed rule applied in 2018, the
OCC would have refunded assessments totaling $579,000 to 22 banks, 19
of which were small banks (approximately two percent of OCC-supervised
small entities). Similarly, if the proposed rule had applied in 2017,
the OCC would have refunded assessments totaling $663,000 to 16 banks,
12 of which were small banks; in 2016, the OCC would have refunded
assessments totaling $392,000 to 26 banks, all of which were small
banks; and in 2015, the OCC would have refunded assessments totaling
$555,000 to 29 banks, 27 of which were small banks. In each of these
years, the number of institutions that would have been affected by the
proposed rule was less than five percent of OCC-supervised small
entities. Therefore, the proposed rule would not have affected a
substantial number of small entities during these years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The OCC bases its estimate of the number of small entities
on the SBA's size thresholds for commercial banks and savings
institutions, and trust companies, which are $550 million and $38.5
million, respectively. Consistent with the General Principles of
Affiliation in 13 CFR 121.103(a), the OCC counts the assets of
affiliated financial institutions when determining if we should
classify an OCC-supervised institution as a small entity. The OCC
uses December 31, 2017, to represent size because a ``financial
institution's assets are determined by averaging the assets reported
on its four quarterly financial statements for the preceding year.''
See footnote 8 of the U.S. Small Business Administration's Table of
Size Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OCC also considered whether the proposed rule would result in a
significant economic impact on small entities. In general, the OCC
classifies the economic impact of expected cost (or benefit) to comply
with a rule on an individual bank as significant if the total estimated
monetized costs (or benefits) in one year are greater than 5 percent of
the bank's total annual salaries and benefits or 2.5 percent of the
bank's total annual non-interest expense. Based on the above criteria,
and the refund amounts for the years 2015 through 2018 outlined above,
the OCC estimates that impact of the proposed rule, had it been in
place for 2015-2018, would not have had a significant economic impact
at any of the affected institutions.
Based on the data and experience of the OCC in recent years with
departures from the charters, the OCC certifies that the proposed rule,
if adopted as final, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The OCC analyzed the proposed rule under the factors set forth in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1532). Under
this analysis, the OCC considered whether the proposed rule includes a
Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year (adjusted for inflation). The OCC has
determined that the proposed rule, if adopted as final, would not
impose new mandates and, therefore, would not result in the expenditure
of $100 million or more annually by state, local, and tribal
governments, or by the private sector.
Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
The Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of
1994 (RCDRIA) requires that each Federal banking agency, in determining
the effective date and administrative compliance requirements for new
regulations that impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other
requirements on insured depository institutions (IDIs), consider,
consistent with principles of safety and soundness and the public
interest, any administrative burdens that such regulations would place
on depository institutions, including small depository institutions,
and customers of depository institutions, as well as the benefits of
such regulations.\16\ In addition, new regulations and amendments to
regulations that impose additional reporting, disclosures, or other new
requirements on IDIs generally must take effect on the first day of a
calendar quarter that begins on or after the date on which the
regulations are published in final form.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(a).
\17\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the proposal would not impose additional reporting,
disclosure, or other requirements on banks, section 302 of the RCDRIA
does not apply. Nevertheless, the requirements of RCDRIA will be
considered as part of the overall rulemaking process. In addition, the
OCC invites comments that will inform the OCC's consideration of
RCDRIA.
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires the OCC to use
plain language in all proposed and final rules published after January
1, 2000. The OCC invites comment on how to make this proposed rule
easier to understand.
For example:
Has the OCC organized the material to inform your needs?
If not, how could the OCC present the proposed rule more clearly?
Are the requirements in the proposed rule clearly stated?
If not, how could the proposal be more clearly stated?
Does the proposed regulation contain technical language or
jargon that is not clear? If so, which language requires clarification?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the proposed regulation easier to
understand? If so, what changes would achieve that?
Is this section format adequate? If not, which of the
sections should be changed and how?
What other changes can the OCC incorporate to make the
proposed regulation easier to understand?
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 8
Assessments, Federal branches and agencies, National banks,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations.
[[Page 10273]]
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, chapter I of title 12 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 8--ASSESSMENT OF FEES
0
1. The authority for part 8 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 16, 93a, 481, 482, 1467, 1831c, 1867, 3102,
3108, and 5412(b)(2)(B); and 15 U.S.C. 78c and 78l.
0
2. Section 8.2 is amended by:
0
a. Removing ``non-lead bank'' wherever it appears and adding ``non-lead
national bank'' in its place;
0
b. Removing ``lead bank'' wherever it appears and adding ``lead
national bank'' in its place;
0
c. Removing ``independent credit card bank'' wherever it appears and
adding ``independent credit card national bank'' in its place;
0
d. Removing ``independent credit card banks'' wherever it appears and
adding ``independent credit card national banks'' in its place;
0
e. Removing ``the bank's'' and by adding ``the national bank's'' in its
place in paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(3), (c)(3)(iii), and
(c)(3)(viii);
0
f. Removing ``A bank's'' and adding ``A national bank'' in its place in
paragraph (a)(1);
0
g. Removing ``the bank'' and adding ``the national bank'' in its place
in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) and (c)(1) and (2);
0
h. Removing ``Comptroller of the Currency'' and adding ``OCC'' in its
place in paragraphs (a) introductory text and (b)(1);
0
i. Removing ``Notice of Comptroller of the Currency Fees'' and adding
``Notice of Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Fees and
Assessments'' in its place in paragraphs (a)(6)(i) and (b)(4)(i);
0
j. Removing ``Federal branch or agency'' and adding ``Federal branch
and agency'' in its place in paragraph (b)(4)(i);
0
k. Removing ``each bank's'' and adding ``each national bank's'' in its
place in paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(A);
0
l. Removing ``or Thrift Financial Report, as appropriate,'' in
paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(A);
0
m. Removing ``six month'' and adding ``six-month'' in its place in
paragraph (b)(1);
0
n. Removing ``national bank'' and adding ``Federal branch and agency''
in its place in paragraph (b)(1);
0
o. Removing ``Notice of Comptroller of the Currency of Fees'' and
adding ``Notice of Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Fees and
Assessments'' in its place in paragraph (c)(1);
0
p. Removing ``full service'' and adding ``full-service'' in its place
in paragraph (c)(2);
0
q. Removing ``or a bank'' and adding ``or a national bank'' in its
place in paragraph (c)(3)(iii); and
0
r. Revising paragraphs (a)(5), (b)(3), and (d).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 8.2 Semiannual assessment.
(a) * * *
(5) The specific marginal rates and complete assessment schedule
will be published in the ``Notice of Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments,'' provided for at Sec. 8.8. Each
semiannual assessment is based upon the total assets shown in the
national bank's or Federal savings association's most recent
``Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income'' (Call Report)
preceding the payment date. Each national bank or Federal savings
association subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC on the date of the
second or fourth quarterly Call Report as appropriate, required by the
OCC under 12 U.S.C. 161 and 12 U.S.C. 1464(v), is subject to the full
assessment for the next six-month period. National banks and Federal
savings associations that are no longer subject to the jurisdiction of
the OCC as of the date of the second or fourth quarterly Call Report,
as appropriate, will receive a refund of assessments for the second
three months of the semiannual assessment period.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Each semiannual assessment of each Federal branch and each
agency is based upon the total assets shown in the Federal branch's or
agency's Call Report most recently preceding the payment date. Each
Federal branch or agency subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC on the
date of the second and fourth Call Reports is subject to the full
assessment for the next six-month period. Federal branches and agencies
that are no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC as of the
date of the second or fourth quarterly Call Report, as appropriate,
will receive a refund of assessments for the second three months of the
semiannual assessment period.
* * * * *
(d) Surcharge based on the condition of the national bank, Federal
savings association, or Federal branch or agency. Subject to any limit
that the OCC prescribes in the ``Notice of Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency Fees and Assessments,'' the OCC shall apply a surcharge to
the semiannual assessment computed in accordance with paragraphs (a)
through (c) of this section. This surcharge will be determined by
multiplying the semiannual assessment computed in accordance with
paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section by--
(1) 1.5, in the case of any national bank or Federal savings
association that receives a composite rating of 3 under the Uniform
Financial Institutions Rating System (UFIRS) and any Federal branch or
agency that receives a composite rating of 3 under the ROCA rating
system (which rates risk management, operational controls, compliance,
and asset quality) at its most recent examination prior to December 31
or June 30, as appropriate; and
(2) 2.0, in the case of any national bank or Federal savings
association that receives a composite UFIRS rating of 4 or 5 and any
Federal branch or agency that receives a composite rating of 4 or 5
under the ROCA rating system at its most recent examination prior to
December 31 or June 30, as appropriate.
0
3. Section 8.6 is amended by:
0
a. Removing ``Notice of Comptroller of the Currency Fees'' and adding
``Notice of Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Fees and
Assessments'' in its place in paragraphs (b), (c)(1)(i) and (ii), and
(c)(3)(vii);
0
b. Removing ``independent trust banks'' wherever it appears and adding
``independent trust national banks'' in its place;
0
c. Removing ``independent trust bank'' wherever it appears and adding
``Independent trust national bank'' in its place;
0
d. Removing ``trust bank'' wherever it appears and adding ``trust
national bank'' in its place;
0
e. Removing ``trust banks'' wherever it appears and adding ``trust
national banks'' in its place;
0
f. Removing ``the bank'' and adding ``the national bank'' in its place
in paragraph (c)(2); and
0
g. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1) and (3), and
(c)(1)(iii).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 8.6 Fees for special examinations and investigations.
(a) Fees. The OCC may assess a fee for:
(1) Examining the fiduciary activities of national banks, Federal
branches of foreign banks, and Federal savings associations and related
entities;
* * * * *
(3) Conducting special examinations and investigations of an entity
with respect to its performance of activities described in section 7(c)
of the Bank Service Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1867(c)) if the OCC
determines that
[[Page 10274]]
assessment of the fee is warranted with regard to a particular national
bank, Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank, or Federal savings
association because of the high risk or unusual nature of the
activities performed; the significance to the national bank's, Federal
branch's or agency's, or Federal saving association's operations and
income of the activities performed; or the extent to which the national
bank, Federal branch or agency, or Federal savings association has
sufficient systems, controls, and personnel to adequately monitor,
measure, and control risks arising from such activities;
* * * * *
(c) * * * (1) * * *
(iii) Surcharge based on the condition of the independent trust
national bank or of the independent trust Federal savings association.
Subject to any limit that the OCC prescribes in the ``Notice of Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency Fees and Assessments,'' the OCC
shall adjust the semiannual assessment computed in accordance with
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section by multiplying that
figure by 1.5 for each independent trust national bank and independent
trust Federal savings association that receives a composite UFIRS
rating of 3 at its most recent examination prior to December 31 or June
30, as appropriate, and by 2.0 for each independent trust national bank
and independent trust Federal savings association that receives a
composite UFIRS rating of 4 or 5 at such examination.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 8.7 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 8.7 Payment of interest on delinquent assessments and
examination and investigation fees.
(a) Each national bank, Federal savings association, Federal
branch, and Federal agency shall pay to the OCC interest on its
delinquent payments of semiannual assessments. In addition, each
institution subject to a special examination or investigation fee shall
pay to the OCC interest on its delinquent payments of special
examination and investigation fees. Semiannual assessment payments will
be considered delinquent if they are received after the time for
payment specified in Sec. 8.2. Special examination and investigation
fees will be considered delinquent if not received by the OCC within 30
calendar days of the invoice date.
(b) In the event that an institution believes that the notice of
assessments or special examination and investigation fees contains an
error or miscalculation, the institution may provide the OCC with a
written request for a revised notice and a refund of any overpayments.
Any such request for a revised notice and refund must be made after
timely payment of the semiannual assessment under the dates specified
in Sec. 8.2 or timely payment of the special examination and
investigation fee within 30 calendar days of the invoice date.
(1) Within 30 calendar days of receipt of such notice, the OCC
shall either--
(i) Refund the amount of the overpayment; or
(ii) Provide notice of its unwillingness to accept the request for
a revised notice of assessments. In the latter instance, the OCC and
the entity claiming the overpayment shall thereafter attempt to reach
agreement on the amount, if any, to be refunded; the OCC shall refund
this amount within 30 calendar days of such agreement.
(2) The OCC shall be considered delinquent if it fails to return an
overpayment in accordance with the time limitations specified in this
paragraph (b). The OCC shall pay interest on any such delinquent
payments.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 8.8 is amended by revising the section heading and paragraph
(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 8.8 Notice of Office of the Comptroller of the Currency fees and
assessments.
* * * * *
(b) Interim and amended notice of fees. The OCC may issue a
``Notice of Interim Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Fees and
Assessments'' or a ``Notice of Amended Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency Fees and Assessments'' from time to time throughout the year
as necessary. Interim or amended notices will be effective 30 days
after issuance.
Dated: March 13, 2019.
Joseph M. Otting,
Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2019-05128 Filed 3-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P