Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records for the Evaluation of the Supportive Services Demonstration, 10113-10117 [2019-05175]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Notices
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology? Please note that written
comments received in response to this
notice will be considered public
records.
Title of Collection: Science and
Technology Collection of Qualitative
Feedback.
Type of Review: New.
Affected Public: Individuals and
Households, Businesses and
Organizations, State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Frequency of Collection: One per
Request.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 30
minutes or under.
Number of Respondents: 215,100.
Total Burden Hours: 34,732.
Dated: February 14, 2019.
Rick Stevens,
Chief Information Officer, Science and
Technology Directorate.
[FR Doc. 2019–05167 Filed 3–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9F–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2019–0008]
Next Generation First Responder
(NGFR)
Science and Technology
Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 30-Day notice of information
collection; New request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), Science and Technology
Directorate (S&T) Next Generation First
Responder (NGFR) program seeks to
develop and integrate next-generation
technologies by testing and evaluating
first responder technologies during
integration demonstration events.
During these events, first responder
participants use prototype technologies
in a fictional scenario—such as a
missing person case, an active shooter
event, or a chemical spill—and are
asked to share their feedback on how
the technology worked in the context of
their emergency response to the
scenario, including whether the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
technologies made them more effective,
efficient or safe.
The information collected during
these events will help provide insight
about how to improve technologies for
first responders and will help DHS
define whether or not the event was
successful. Additionally, the feedback
and evaluation DHS receives will be
used in knowledge products that will
then be distributed to other state and
local first responder organizations.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
accepted until April 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
this proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to the OMB Desk Officer, via electronic
mail to dhsdeskofficer@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DHS/S&T/CIO Program Manager: Mary
Cantey, Mary.K.Cantey@hq.dhs.gov or
202–254–5367 (Not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DHS, in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., provides the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed, revised, and
continuing collections of information.
DHS is soliciting comments on the
proposed information collection request
(ICR) that is described below. DHS is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology? Please note that written
comments received in response to this
notice will be considered public
records.
Title of Collection: Next Generation
First Responder Technology Evaluation
Survey.
Type of Review: New.
Respondents/Affected Public: Law
Enforcement, Firefighters.
Frequency of Collection: Quarterly.
Average Burden per Response: 15
minutes.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 900.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 225.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10113
Dated: February 14, 2019.
Rick Stevens,
Chief Information Officer, Science and
Technology Directorate.
[FR Doc. 2019–05166 Filed 3–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9F–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–6146–N–03]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records for the Evaluation of the
Supportive Services Demonstration
Office of Policy Development
and Research.
ACTION: Notice of a new System of
Records.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended, notice is hereby
given that the Office of Policy
Development and Research (PD&R), U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), provides public
notice regarding its System of Records
for the Evaluation of the Supportive
Services Demonstration (SSD). The SSD
is a three-year demonstration sponsored
by HUD to test the impact of a new
model of housing-based supportive
services on the healthcare utilization
and housing stability of low-income
older adults. HUD’s Office of Policy
Development and Research contracted
with Abt Associates Inc. (Abt) to
evaluate the SSD. The evaluation entails
matching administrative data already
being collected on demonstration
participants by HUD, the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
in the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), state Medicaid agencies
in seven states, and The Lewin Group
(the implementation contractor for the
demonstration). The various
administrative data sets will be matched
to demonstration participants and
linked using personally identifying
information (PII) collected by HUD. The
evaluation dataset that results from the
administrative data matching will
include PII and protected health
information (PHI) and is the proposed
system of records.
DATES: This notice will become effective
April 18, 2019.
Comments Due Dates: April 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by one of the following methods:
Interested persons are invited to submit
comments regarding this notice to the
Rules Docket Clerk, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
10114
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Notices
SW, Room 10139, Washington, DC
20410. Comments may be filed
electronically by accessing:
www.regulations.gov. Regulations.gov
provides clear instructions on how to
submit a public comment on a rule.
Communications should refer to the
above docket number and title. Faxed
comments are not accepted. A copy of
each communication submitted will be
available for public inspection and
copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
weekdays at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Bravacos, Senior Agency Official for
Privacy, at 451 7th Street SW, Room
10139; U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development; Washington, DC
20410–0001; telephone number 202–
708–3054 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals who are hearingor speech-impaired may access this
telephone number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339 (this is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The new
System of Records will encompass
administrative data assembled by HUD’s
contractor, Abt Associates Inc., for the
Evaluation of the Supportive Services
Demonstration, which is designed to
assess the implementation and impact
of a new approach to help low-income
seniors in HUD-assisted multifamily
developments successfully age in place.
In January 2016, HUD solicited
applications for the Supportive Services
Demonstration for Elderly Households
in HUD-Assisted Multifamily Housing.
The Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) offered grant funding to
multifamily property owners to
implement the Integrated Wellness in
Supportive Housing (IWISH) model over
a three-year period. A total of 124 HUDassisted properties, housing
approximately 13,000 elderly residents,
are participating in the demonstration.
These properties are located in seven
states: California, Illinois, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey,
and South Carolina.
The evaluation will collect qualitative
information through questionnaires,
interviews, and focus groups to assess
the implementation of the
demonstration. The data will not be
store and retrieved using PII, and
therefore will not be records in the
system. The evaluation will also
measure the impacts of the
demonstration by obtaining pre-existing
administrative data for residents of the
124 demonstration properties and
matching those data to create a linked
evaluation dataset. The data sources that
will be part of the linked dataset and
will be records in the system are:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
• Data from HUD’s Tenant Rental
Assistance Certification System
(TRACS) system. The TRACS data are
available for all residents of the 124
properties and provides the PII used to
retrieve information on demonstration
participants from the other data sources.
• Medicare claims and enrollment
data collected by CMS and made
available for research through CMS’s
Research Data Assistance Center
(ResDAC).
• Medicaid claims and enrollment
data collected by the seven states in the
study
• Self-reported demographic and
health and social status information
collected by The Lewin Group for
demonstration participants who enroll
in the Integrated Wellness in Supportive
Housing (IWISH) pilot program. These
data are collected via the Population
Health Logistics (PHL) platform, which
is covered by a separate SORN, ‘‘HUD
Supportive Services Demonstration/
Integrated Wellness in Supportive
Housing: Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records,’’ published in the Federal
Register on February 15, 2018 (83 FR
6875).
The evaluation will use the PII
contained in the TRACS data to link
HUD administrative records for
demonstration participants to Medicaid
and Medicare claims data and select
data from the PHL platform. The
evaluation supports HUD’s mission by
fulfilling legislatively mandated
requirements for evaluation and
evaluating the effectiveness of the
Supportive Services Demonstration. The
demonstration and evaluation support
HUD’s mission of meeting the need for
quality affordable rental homes and
utilizing housing as a platform for
improving quality of life.
The new notice states the name and
location of the record system, the
authority for and manner of its
operations, the categories of individuals
that it covers, the type of records that it
contains, the sources of the information
for the records, the routine uses made of
the records, and the types of exemptions
in place for the records. The notice also
includes the business address of the
HUD officials who will inform
interested persons of how they may gain
access to and/or request amendments to
records pertaining to themselves.
Publication of this notice allows the
Department to provide new information
about its system of records notices in a
clear and cohesive format. The new
system of records will incorporate
Federal privacy requirements and
Department’s policy requirements. The
Privacy Act places on Federal agencies
principal responsibility for compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with its provisions, by requiring Federal
agencies to safeguard an individual’s
records against an invasion of personal
privacy; protect the records contained in
an agency system of records from
unauthorized disclosure; ensure that the
records collected are relevant,
necessary, current, and collected only
for their intended use; and adequately
safeguard the records to prevent misuse
of such information. In addition, this
notice demonstrates the Department’s
focus on industry best practices to
protect the personal privacy of the
individuals covered by this SORN.
Pursuant to the Privacy Act and the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) guidelines, a report of the system
of records was submitted to OMB, the
Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs, and
the House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform, as instructed by
paragraph 7a of OMB Circular No. A–
108, ‘‘Federal Agency Responsibilities
for Review, Reporting, and Publication
under the Privacy Act,’’ December 23,
2016.
SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
Administrative Dataset for the
Evaluation of HUD’s Supportive
Services Demonstration Evaluation.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
No information in the system is
classified.
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Abt Associates has headquarters at
6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD
20852. Records are stored in Abt’s
Analytic Computing Environment (ACE
3), which meets NIST SP 800–53
Revision 4 FISMA Moderate Standards,
and utilizes FedRAMP Moderate
accredited services from Amazon as
infrastructure. Amazon is located at 410
Terry Ave. N, Seattle, WA 98109. HUD’s
Office of Policy Development and
Research, Program Evaluation Division,
is located at 471 Seventh Street SW,
Room 8120, Washington, DC 20410.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S):
Carol S. Star, Program Evaluation
Division, Office of Policy Development
and Research, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20410;
telephone number 202–402–6139 (this
is not a toll-free number).
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
Sec. 501 and 502 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1970 (Pub. L.
91–609), 12 U.S.C. 1701z–1, 1701z–2.
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Notices
PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM:
The purpose of the system is to allow
the Department to study information
gathered on Supportive Services
Demonstration IWISH pilot program
participants in comparison to other
participants receiving HUD-assisted
elderly housing. The system will be
used to link, store, and analyze the
administrative data collected through
the SSD evaluation (HUD data,
Medicare data, Medicaid data, and PHL
data). Use of this system is essential to
the successful implementation of the
evaluation because analyzing personlevel linked health and housing data is
the main way the evaluation will
measure the impacts of the
demonstration on participating
residents. Matching existing data from
different federal and state government
agencies is an innovative and costeffective evaluation method that
minimizes data collection burden on the
public.
HUD and policy makers will use the
information collected through the
evaluation to understand the
effectiveness and outcomes of the
IWISH model. The evaluation will
provide insight to Congress, HUD,
grantee states, and other interested
parties on issues to consider in
providing housing-based supportive
services. It will also provide rigorous,
quantitative data on the impact of
housing-based supportive services on
healthcare utilization and housing
stability among older adults in HUDassisted housing.
The goal of the IWISH pilot being
evaluated is to help low-income seniors
to age in their own homes and delay or
avoid the need for nursing home care.
IWISH features a full-time Resident
Wellness Director (RWD) with a parttime Wellness Nurse (WN) at each
property. The RWD and WN work
together to implement a formal strategy
for coordinating services to help
residents meet their needs. This strategy
includes six key components:
• Resident engagement and a program
rollout process to maximize
participation.
• Standardized assessment with all
participants after program enrollment
and periodically throughout
demonstration.
• A healthy aging plan for each
participant and each property to address
identified needs and interests, and a
wellness and service coordination
process to implement plans and address
other resident needs.
• A centralized, web-based platform
for tracking and monitoring resident and
program data.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
• Partnerships with appropriate local
social service and health providers.
• Use of appropriate evidence-based
health and wellness programs.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Residents of 124 HUD-assisted
multifamily housing properties in
California, Illinois, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey
and South Carolina. Most individuals
will be low-income seniors aged 62 or
older.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
• HUD-Tenant Rental Assistance
Certificate System (TRACS): Tenantlevel data on HUD-assisted residents.
Data include age, race, ethnicity,
household size, income, housing cost,
and length of tenure, as well as PII
(name, DOB, SSN) for purposes of data
matching to Medicare, Medicaid, and
PHL data.
• CMS/ResDAC Data (Medicare):
Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims,
Master Beneficiary Summary File
(Enrollment Database), and Minimum
Data Set 3.0 (MDS) from ResDAC. The
data in these files include: inpatient,
outpatient, skilled nursing facility,
hospice, home health, carrier and
Durable Medical Equipment Center
(DMERC) claims, Part D event files, and
nursing home assessment data. Data
include PII and PHI. We will obtain the
data through a Data Use Agreement with
ResDAC, the contractor that manages
external data requests on behalf of CMS.
• State Medicaid Data: Medicaid
enrollment, fee-for-service (FFS) claims,
and managed care encounter data. Data
include PII and PHI. We will obtain data
through separate Data Use Agreements
with each of the seven states featured in
the study.
• PHL Data: Self-reported
demographic and health and social
status information data on
demonstration participants enrolled in
IWISH collected by The Lewin Group.
The main data items are (for each
participant) an assessment of health and
wellness, individual healthy aging plan,
and data on the services and programs
used. Includes PII and PHI. Data will be
obtained through a Data Use Agreement
with The Lewin Group, which is
covered by a separate SORN, ‘‘HUD
Supportive Services Demonstration/
Integrated Wellness in Supportive
Housing: Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records,’’ published in the Federal
Register on February 15, 2018 (83 FR
6875).
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
HUD will obtain the records from one
federal agency (HHS/CMS); state
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10115
Medicaid agencies in seven states
(California, Illinois, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey
and South Carolina); and one private
entity, HUD’s contractor for the
implementation of the demonstration,
The Lewin Group. The focus groups and
interviews conducted for the evaluation
are not a source of records for the
purposes of the SORN.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
In addition to those disclosures
generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
Section 552a(b) of the Privacy Act, all or
a portion of the records or information
contained in this system may be
disclosed outside HUD as a routine use
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as
follows:
1. To contractors, experts, consultants
with whom HUD has a contract, service
agreement, or other assignments of the
Department, when necessary to utilize
relevant data for purposes of testing new
technology and systems designed to
enhance program operations and
performance.
2. To appropriate agencies, entities,
and persons when (1) HUD suspects or
has confirmed that there has been a
breach of the system of records; (2) HUD
has determined that as a result of the
suspected or confirmed breach there is
a risk of harm to individuals, HUD
(including its information systems,
programs, and operations), the Federal
Government, or national security; and
(3) the disclosure made to such
agencies, entities, and persons is
reasonably necessary to assist in
connection with HUD’s efforts to
respond to the suspected or confirmed
breach or to prevent, minimize, or
remedy such harm.
3. To another Federal agency or
Federal entity, when HUD determines
that information from this system of
records is reasonably necessary to assist
the recipient agency or entity in (1)
responding to a suspected or confirmed
breach or (2) preventing, minimizing, or
remedying the risk of harm to
individuals, the recipient agency or
entity (including its information
systems, programs, and operations), the
Federal Government, or national
security, resulting from a suspected or
confirmed breach.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF
RECORDS:
Abt provides all project staff with
HIPAA Rules of the Road—Practical
Information for Ensuring Compliance;
IRB 101 Training; General Security
Awareness Training; and CITI Human
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
10116
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Notices
Subjects Training. All study team
members also undergo project specific
training on maintaining privacy and safe
data storage and handling procedures.
All study team members will be made
aware of the project-specific data
regulations and best practices associated
with handling data for the study. These
practices are incorporated in the study
protocol and will be detailed in training
plans for interviewers, support staff, and
data analytic staff. Abt will receive PII
information from HUD TRACS data,
including full name, date of birth,
gender, SSN, address, for all residents of
the 124 HUD-assisted multifamily
properties in the demonstration.
HUD will transmit the data to Abt
through either Huddle, Abt’s FedRAMP
Moderate accredited file transfer service
for moving data in and out of the
system, or another secure file transfer
system (SFTP) of HUD’s choice. Abt will
access the data through its Analytic
Computing Environment, ACE 3, which
meets NIST SP 800–53 Revision 4
FISMA Moderate Standards, and
utilizes FedRAMP Moderate accredited
services from Amazon as infrastructure.
Only authorized Abt staff will have
access to the data on ACE 3 and to the
project-specific folder on Huddle.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF
RECORDS:
Once records are stored in Abt’s
database, records will be retrieved by
Abt staff that are listed in data
agreements as the individuals that can
handle the data when PII or PHI is
included in that data. Sessions are
marked inactive when users log out of
the system or stop working in the
system for more than fifteen minutes.
Records with PII will primarily be
retrieved to obtain data from ResDAC
and the State Medicaid agencies and to
merge the four types of data: HUD
TRACS, Medicare, Medicaid, and PHL
into one evaluation data set. The
personal identifiers used for these
additional data sources are SSN, first
and last name, and date of birth.
Identifiers will only be retained where
necessary for analysis. Any identifiers
not needed for analysis (such as SSN)
will be removed from the evaluation
data set before analysis begins.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND
DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
The system of records will be retained
by the contractor for no later than three
years after the completion of the
contract. After this time, no copies of or
extracts from the person-level
administrative data files, including
names, address information, social
security numbers, birthdates, or other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
identifiers shall be retained by the
contractor. No later than three years
after the completion of the contract, and
pursuant to the terms of the individual
data use agreements, the contractor will
destroy the person-level administrative
data obtained for the study from entities
other than HUD. This includes:
• Medicare claims data provided by
CMS/ResDAC
• Medicaid claims data provided by
the seven states in the study
• PHL data (provided by The Lewin
Group)
The contractor will return to HUD the
person-level administrative database file
obtained from HUD’s TRACS system,
with appended information on whether
an individual was enrolled at any time
in the IWISH program, the date of the
resident’s enrollment, and the date (if
applicable) of the residents disenrollment from the program. (The
information on enrollment will be
obtained from the PHL data and will be
included in the data use agreement with
The Lewin Group.)
The contractor will also provide to
HUD the programming code used to
merge the database files and to conduct
the analysis for the final reports, as part
of the replication protocol described
below. Published reports will be posted
on HUDUser.gov. The replication
protocol will be archived in perpetuity.
The retention and disposal
procedures are in keeping with HUD’s
records management policies as
described in 44 U.S.C. 3101 and 44
U.S.C. 3303 and with HUD’s Records
Disposition Schedule 67 for PD&R, Item
6. (https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/
documents/huddoc?id=
22256x67ADMH.pdf).
ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL
SAFEGUARDS:
The study’s approved data security
plan describes the safeguarding of any
hardcopy, recorded, and electronic
information on human subjects that will
be a part of the study. All study team
members are aware of the projectspecific data regulations and best
practices associated with handling data
for the study. These practices are
incorporated in the study protocol and
will be detailed in training plans for
interviewers, support staff, and data
analytic staff. All staff who will have
access to the data containing PII or PHI
information sign a confidentiality
agreement per the requirements of all
data use agreements.
Abt will guarantee this level of
restricted access by only using secure
transfer mechanisms, such as Huddle,
Abt’s FedRAMP Moderate accredited
file transfer service for moving data in
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and out of the system, or another secure
file transfer system (SFTP) of the
transferring agency’s choice. Abt will
also only access the data through its
restricted access folder on the Analytic
Computing Environment, ACE 3, which
meets NIST SP 800–53 Revision 4
FISMA Moderate Standards, and
utilizes FedRAMP Moderate accredited
services from Amazon as infrastructure.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
For information, assistance, or inquiry
about records, contact John Bravacos,
Senior Agency Official for Privacy, at
451 7th Street SW, Room 10226; U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development; Washington, DC 20410–
0001, telephone number 202–6064 (this
is not a toll-free number). When seeking
records about yourself from this system
of records or any other Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) system of
records, your request must conform
with the Privacy Act regulations set
forth in 24 CFR part 16. You must first
verify your identity, meaning that you
must provide your full name, address,
and date and place of birth. You must
sign your request, and your signature
must either be notarized or submitted
under 28 U.S.C. 1746, a law that permits
statements to be made, under penalty of
perjury, as a substitute for notarization.
If your request is seeking records
pertaining to another living individual,
you must include a statement from that
individual certifying their agreement for
you to access their records. Without the
above information, the HUD FOIA
Office may not conduct an effective
search, and your request may be denied
due to lack of specificity or lack of
compliance with regulations.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The Department’s rules for contesting
contents of records and appealing initial
denials appear in 24 CFR part 16,
Procedures for Inquiries. Additional
assistance may be obtained by
contacting John Bravacos, Senior
Agency Official for Privacy, at 451 7th
Street SW, Room 10139; U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development; Washington, DC 20410–
0001, or the HUD Departmental Privacy
Appeals Officers; Office of General
Counsel; U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development; 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410–0001.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking notification of
and access to any record contained in
this system of records, or seeking to
contest its content, may submit a
request in writing to the component’s
FOIA Officer, whose contact
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Notices
PIH, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room
3178, Washington, DC 20410; telephone
202–402–4109, (this is not a toll-free
number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number via TTY by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339. Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Mussington.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
information can be found at https://
www.hud.gov/foia under ‘‘contact.’’ if
an individual believes more than one
component maintains Privacy Act
records concerning him or her the
individual may submit the request to
the Chief Privacy Officer, HUD, 451
Seventh Street SW, Room 10139,
Washington, DC 20410.
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
HISTORY:
None.
Dated: March 13, 2019.
John Bravacos,
Senior Agency Official for Privacy.
A. Overview of Information Collection
[FR Doc. 2019–05175 Filed 3–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7015–N–03]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Indian Housing Block Grant
(IHBG) Program Information Collection
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, PIH, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: May 20,
2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; telephone 202–402–3400
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arlette Mussington, Office of Policy,
Programs and Legislative Initiatives,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Mar 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
Title of Information Collection: Indian
Housing Block Grant (IHBG) Program
Information Collection.
OMB Approval Number: 2577–0218.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Form Number: HUD–4117, HUD–
4119, HUD–52736–A, HUD–52736–B,
HUD–52737, HUD–53246, HUD–53247.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
forms included in this collection are
associated with the Indian Housing
Block Grant (IHBG) program, as
authorized under Title I of the Native
American Housing Assistance and SelfDetermination Reauthorization Act
(NAHASDA) (25 U.S.C. 4101). The
IHBG program provides funding to
eligible Native American tribes and
tribally designated housing entities
(TDHEs) in the form of formula-based
allocations and competitive awards.
IHBG Formula Allocations
NAHASDA authorizes HUD to
allocate IHBG funds by formula
annually. Recipients may use their
IHBG funds to carry out a range of
affordable housing activities that benefit
low-income Indian families living on
Indian reservations or in other Indian
areas. HUD’s Fiscal Year 2018 Report to
Congress states that there are
approximately 592 Indian tribes in 34
states that are eligible to participate in
the program.
To receive an IHBG, a recipient is
required to submit an Indian Housing
Plan (IHP) annually to the Office of
Native American Programs (ONAP). The
IHP describes its planned affordable
housing activities for its upcoming
program year. The IHP is due to ONAP
at least 75 days before the recipient’s
program year begins.
Recipients must also submit an
Annual Performance Report (APR) to
ONAP within 90 days of the end of their
program year. The APR details the
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10117
actual activities and accomplishments
of their IHBG-funded housing programs.
IHBG Competitive Awards
In Fiscal Years 2018 and 2019,
Congress enacted H.R. 1625—
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018
(Pub. L. 115–141) (Effective: 3/23/18)
that appropriated $99,000,000 each
fiscal year for IHBGs awarded on a
competitive basis. The IHBG
Competitive program will give priority
to projects that will spur construction
and rehabilitation from NAHASDAeligible recipients while considering
need and administrative capacity.
Additionally, applicants may apply for
other eligible activities under Section
202 of NAHASDA.
In Fiscal Year 2019, HUD will make
nearly $2,000,000 in IHBG Competitive
funds available under a Notice of
Funding Availability (NOFA) and will
award the funds to the applicants with
the highest rated applications,
particularly those with the greatest
housing need and administrative
capacity. The regulations and
requirements governing the formuladriven IHBG program will apply to the
competitive IHBG program.
IHBG Competitive applicants must
submit a complete application package
which includes a narrative response to
the NOFA requirements, Application for
Federal Assistance (SF–424), Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure/Update Report
(HUD–2880), Acknowledgement of
Application Receipt (HUD–2993), and
two new forms: IHBG Cost Summary
(HUD–53246), and IHBG
Implementation Schedule (HUD–
53247). At the end of the 12-month
program year, grant recipients submit
APRs describing accomplishments,
outcomes, and outputs.
Attached to this submission are
copies of the FY 2018 Appropriations
language for the competitive IHBG
program, FY 2019 IHBG Competitive
NOFA, NAHASDA statute, and
NAHASDA regulations at 24 CFR part
1000.
HUD–52737: Indian Housing Plan/
Annual Performance Report (IHP/APR).
A recipient of IHBG funds is required to
submit an IHP/APR (HUD–52737) that
consists of two components. The Indian
Housing Plan (IHP) component
describes the eligible IHBG-funded,
affordable housing activities the
recipient plans to conduct for the
benefit of low- and moderate-income
tribal members and identifies the
intended outcomes and outputs for the
upcoming 12-month program year. At
the end of the 12-month period, the
recipient submits the Annual
Performance Report (APR) component
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10113-10117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05175]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-6146-N-03]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records for the Evaluation of the
Supportive Services Demonstration
AGENCY: Office of Policy Development and Research.
ACTION: Notice of a new System of Records.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, notice is
hereby given that the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R),
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), provides public
notice regarding its System of Records for the Evaluation of the
Supportive Services Demonstration (SSD). The SSD is a three-year
demonstration sponsored by HUD to test the impact of a new model of
housing-based supportive services on the healthcare utilization and
housing stability of low-income older adults. HUD's Office of Policy
Development and Research contracted with Abt Associates Inc. (Abt) to
evaluate the SSD. The evaluation entails matching administrative data
already being collected on demonstration participants by HUD, the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS), state Medicaid agencies in seven
states, and The Lewin Group (the implementation contractor for the
demonstration). The various administrative data sets will be matched to
demonstration participants and linked using personally identifying
information (PII) collected by HUD. The evaluation dataset that results
from the administrative data matching will include PII and protected
health information (PHI) and is the proposed system of records.
DATES: This notice will become effective April 18, 2019.
Comments Due Dates: April 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by one of the following methods: Interested persons are invited
to submit comments regarding this notice to the Rules Docket Clerk,
Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street
[[Page 10114]]
SW, Room 10139, Washington, DC 20410. Comments may be filed
electronically by accessing: www.regulations.gov. Regulations.gov
provides clear instructions on how to submit a public comment on a
rule. Communications should refer to the above docket number and title.
Faxed comments are not accepted. A copy of each communication submitted
will be available for public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and
5 p.m. weekdays at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bravacos, Senior Agency Official
for Privacy, at 451 7th Street SW, Room 10139; U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development; Washington, DC 20410-0001; telephone
number 202-708-3054 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals who
are hearing- or speech-impaired may access this telephone number via
TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339 (this is a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The new System of Records will encompass
administrative data assembled by HUD's contractor, Abt Associates Inc.,
for the Evaluation of the Supportive Services Demonstration, which is
designed to assess the implementation and impact of a new approach to
help low-income seniors in HUD-assisted multifamily developments
successfully age in place. In January 2016, HUD solicited applications
for the Supportive Services Demonstration for Elderly Households in
HUD-Assisted Multifamily Housing. The Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) offered grant funding to multifamily property owners to
implement the Integrated Wellness in Supportive Housing (IWISH) model
over a three-year period. A total of 124 HUD-assisted properties,
housing approximately 13,000 elderly residents, are participating in
the demonstration. These properties are located in seven states:
California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey,
and South Carolina.
The evaluation will collect qualitative information through
questionnaires, interviews, and focus groups to assess the
implementation of the demonstration. The data will not be store and
retrieved using PII, and therefore will not be records in the system.
The evaluation will also measure the impacts of the demonstration by
obtaining pre-existing administrative data for residents of the 124
demonstration properties and matching those data to create a linked
evaluation dataset. The data sources that will be part of the linked
dataset and will be records in the system are:
Data from HUD's Tenant Rental Assistance Certification
System (TRACS) system. The TRACS data are available for all residents
of the 124 properties and provides the PII used to retrieve information
on demonstration participants from the other data sources.
Medicare claims and enrollment data collected by CMS and
made available for research through CMS's Research Data Assistance
Center (ResDAC).
Medicaid claims and enrollment data collected by the seven
states in the study
Self-reported demographic and health and social status
information collected by The Lewin Group for demonstration participants
who enroll in the Integrated Wellness in Supportive Housing (IWISH)
pilot program. These data are collected via the Population Health
Logistics (PHL) platform, which is covered by a separate SORN, ``HUD
Supportive Services Demonstration/Integrated Wellness in Supportive
Housing: Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records,'' published in the
Federal Register on February 15, 2018 (83 FR 6875).
The evaluation will use the PII contained in the TRACS data to link
HUD administrative records for demonstration participants to Medicaid
and Medicare claims data and select data from the PHL platform. The
evaluation supports HUD's mission by fulfilling legislatively mandated
requirements for evaluation and evaluating the effectiveness of the
Supportive Services Demonstration. The demonstration and evaluation
support HUD's mission of meeting the need for quality affordable rental
homes and utilizing housing as a platform for improving quality of
life.
The new notice states the name and location of the record system,
the authority for and manner of its operations, the categories of
individuals that it covers, the type of records that it contains, the
sources of the information for the records, the routine uses made of
the records, and the types of exemptions in place for the records. The
notice also includes the business address of the HUD officials who will
inform interested persons of how they may gain access to and/or request
amendments to records pertaining to themselves.
Publication of this notice allows the Department to provide new
information about its system of records notices in a clear and cohesive
format. The new system of records will incorporate Federal privacy
requirements and Department's policy requirements. The Privacy Act
places on Federal agencies principal responsibility for compliance with
its provisions, by requiring Federal agencies to safeguard an
individual's records against an invasion of personal privacy; protect
the records contained in an agency system of records from unauthorized
disclosure; ensure that the records collected are relevant, necessary,
current, and collected only for their intended use; and adequately
safeguard the records to prevent misuse of such information. In
addition, this notice demonstrates the Department's focus on industry
best practices to protect the personal privacy of the individuals
covered by this SORN.
Pursuant to the Privacy Act and the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) guidelines, a report of the system of records was submitted to
OMB, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs, and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, as
instructed by paragraph 7a of OMB Circular No. A-108, ``Federal Agency
Responsibilities for Review, Reporting, and Publication under the
Privacy Act,'' December 23, 2016.
SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
Administrative Dataset for the Evaluation of HUD's Supportive
Services Demonstration Evaluation.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
No information in the system is classified.
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Abt Associates has headquarters at 6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville,
MD 20852. Records are stored in Abt's Analytic Computing Environment
(ACE 3), which meets NIST SP 800-53 Revision 4 FISMA Moderate
Standards, and utilizes FedRAMP Moderate accredited services from
Amazon as infrastructure. Amazon is located at 410 Terry Ave. N,
Seattle, WA 98109. HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research,
Program Evaluation Division, is located at 471 Seventh Street SW, Room
8120, Washington, DC 20410.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S):
Carol S. Star, Program Evaluation Division, Office of Policy
Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone number
202-402-6139 (this is not a toll-free number).
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
Sec. 501 and 502 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970
(Pub. L. 91-609), 12 U.S.C. 1701z-1, 1701z-2.
[[Page 10115]]
PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM:
The purpose of the system is to allow the Department to study
information gathered on Supportive Services Demonstration IWISH pilot
program participants in comparison to other participants receiving HUD-
assisted elderly housing. The system will be used to link, store, and
analyze the administrative data collected through the SSD evaluation
(HUD data, Medicare data, Medicaid data, and PHL data). Use of this
system is essential to the successful implementation of the evaluation
because analyzing person-level linked health and housing data is the
main way the evaluation will measure the impacts of the demonstration
on participating residents. Matching existing data from different
federal and state government agencies is an innovative and cost-
effective evaluation method that minimizes data collection burden on
the public.
HUD and policy makers will use the information collected through
the evaluation to understand the effectiveness and outcomes of the
IWISH model. The evaluation will provide insight to Congress, HUD,
grantee states, and other interested parties on issues to consider in
providing housing-based supportive services. It will also provide
rigorous, quantitative data on the impact of housing-based supportive
services on healthcare utilization and housing stability among older
adults in HUD-assisted housing.
The goal of the IWISH pilot being evaluated is to help low-income
seniors to age in their own homes and delay or avoid the need for
nursing home care. IWISH features a full-time Resident Wellness
Director (RWD) with a part-time Wellness Nurse (WN) at each property.
The RWD and WN work together to implement a formal strategy for
coordinating services to help residents meet their needs. This strategy
includes six key components:
Resident engagement and a program rollout process to
maximize participation.
Standardized assessment with all participants after
program enrollment and periodically throughout demonstration.
A healthy aging plan for each participant and each
property to address identified needs and interests, and a wellness and
service coordination process to implement plans and address other
resident needs.
A centralized, web-based platform for tracking and
monitoring resident and program data.
Partnerships with appropriate local social service and
health providers.
Use of appropriate evidence-based health and wellness
programs.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM:
Residents of 124 HUD-assisted multifamily housing properties in
California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey and
South Carolina. Most individuals will be low-income seniors aged 62 or
older.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
HUD-Tenant Rental Assistance Certificate System (TRACS):
Tenant-level data on HUD-assisted residents. Data include age, race,
ethnicity, household size, income, housing cost, and length of tenure,
as well as PII (name, DOB, SSN) for purposes of data matching to
Medicare, Medicaid, and PHL data.
CMS/ResDAC Data (Medicare): Medicare fee-for-service (FFS)
claims, Master Beneficiary Summary File (Enrollment Database), and
Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) from ResDAC. The data in these files
include: inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, hospice, home
health, carrier and Durable Medical Equipment Center (DMERC) claims,
Part D event files, and nursing home assessment data. Data include PII
and PHI. We will obtain the data through a Data Use Agreement with
ResDAC, the contractor that manages external data requests on behalf of
CMS.
State Medicaid Data: Medicaid enrollment, fee-for-service
(FFS) claims, and managed care encounter data. Data include PII and
PHI. We will obtain data through separate Data Use Agreements with each
of the seven states featured in the study.
PHL Data: Self-reported demographic and health and social
status information data on demonstration participants enrolled in IWISH
collected by The Lewin Group. The main data items are (for each
participant) an assessment of health and wellness, individual healthy
aging plan, and data on the services and programs used. Includes PII
and PHI. Data will be obtained through a Data Use Agreement with The
Lewin Group, which is covered by a separate SORN, ``HUD Supportive
Services Demonstration/Integrated Wellness in Supportive Housing:
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records,'' published in the Federal
Register on February 15, 2018 (83 FR 6875).
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
HUD will obtain the records from one federal agency (HHS/CMS);
state Medicaid agencies in seven states (California, Illinois,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey and South Carolina); and
one private entity, HUD's contractor for the implementation of the
demonstration, The Lewin Group. The focus groups and interviews
conducted for the evaluation are not a source of records for the
purposes of the SORN.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES
OF USERS AND PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
In addition to those disclosures generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
Section 552a(b) of the Privacy Act, all or a portion of the records or
information contained in this system may be disclosed outside HUD as a
routine use pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows:
1. To contractors, experts, consultants with whom HUD has a
contract, service agreement, or other assignments of the Department,
when necessary to utilize relevant data for purposes of testing new
technology and systems designed to enhance program operations and
performance.
2. To appropriate agencies, entities, and persons when (1) HUD
suspects or has confirmed that there has been a breach of the system of
records; (2) HUD has determined that as a result of the suspected or
confirmed breach there is a risk of harm to individuals, HUD (including
its information systems, programs, and operations), the Federal
Government, or national security; and (3) the disclosure made to such
agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to assist in
connection with HUD's efforts to respond to the suspected or confirmed
breach or to prevent, minimize, or remedy such harm.
3. To another Federal agency or Federal entity, when HUD determines
that information from this system of records is reasonably necessary to
assist the recipient agency or entity in (1) responding to a suspected
or confirmed breach or (2) preventing, minimizing, or remedying the
risk of harm to individuals, the recipient agency or entity (including
its information systems, programs, and operations), the Federal
Government, or national security, resulting from a suspected or
confirmed breach.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF RECORDS:
Abt provides all project staff with HIPAA Rules of the Road--
Practical Information for Ensuring Compliance; IRB 101 Training;
General Security Awareness Training; and CITI Human
[[Page 10116]]
Subjects Training. All study team members also undergo project specific
training on maintaining privacy and safe data storage and handling
procedures.
All study team members will be made aware of the project-specific
data regulations and best practices associated with handling data for
the study. These practices are incorporated in the study protocol and
will be detailed in training plans for interviewers, support staff, and
data analytic staff. Abt will receive PII information from HUD TRACS
data, including full name, date of birth, gender, SSN, address, for all
residents of the 124 HUD-assisted multifamily properties in the
demonstration.
HUD will transmit the data to Abt through either Huddle, Abt's
FedRAMP Moderate accredited file transfer service for moving data in
and out of the system, or another secure file transfer system (SFTP) of
HUD's choice. Abt will access the data through its Analytic Computing
Environment, ACE 3, which meets NIST SP 800-53 Revision 4 FISMA
Moderate Standards, and utilizes FedRAMP Moderate accredited services
from Amazon as infrastructure. Only authorized Abt staff will have
access to the data on ACE 3 and to the project-specific folder on
Huddle.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF RECORDS:
Once records are stored in Abt's database, records will be
retrieved by Abt staff that are listed in data agreements as the
individuals that can handle the data when PII or PHI is included in
that data. Sessions are marked inactive when users log out of the
system or stop working in the system for more than fifteen minutes.
Records with PII will primarily be retrieved to obtain data from ResDAC
and the State Medicaid agencies and to merge the four types of data:
HUD TRACS, Medicare, Medicaid, and PHL into one evaluation data set.
The personal identifiers used for these additional data sources are
SSN, first and last name, and date of birth. Identifiers will only be
retained where necessary for analysis. Any identifiers not needed for
analysis (such as SSN) will be removed from the evaluation data set
before analysis begins.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
The system of records will be retained by the contractor for no
later than three years after the completion of the contract. After this
time, no copies of or extracts from the person-level administrative
data files, including names, address information, social security
numbers, birthdates, or other identifiers shall be retained by the
contractor. No later than three years after the completion of the
contract, and pursuant to the terms of the individual data use
agreements, the contractor will destroy the person-level administrative
data obtained for the study from entities other than HUD. This
includes:
Medicare claims data provided by CMS/ResDAC
Medicaid claims data provided by the seven states in the
study
PHL data (provided by The Lewin Group)
The contractor will return to HUD the person-level administrative
database file obtained from HUD's TRACS system, with appended
information on whether an individual was enrolled at any time in the
IWISH program, the date of the resident's enrollment, and the date (if
applicable) of the residents dis-enrollment from the program. (The
information on enrollment will be obtained from the PHL data and will
be included in the data use agreement with The Lewin Group.)
The contractor will also provide to HUD the programming code used
to merge the database files and to conduct the analysis for the final
reports, as part of the replication protocol described below. Published
reports will be posted on HUDUser.gov. The replication protocol will be
archived in perpetuity.
The retention and disposal procedures are in keeping with HUD's
records management policies as described in 44 U.S.C. 3101 and 44
U.S.C. 3303 and with HUD's Records Disposition Schedule 67 for PD&R,
Item 6. (https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=22256x67ADMH.pdf).
ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDS:
The study's approved data security plan describes the safeguarding
of any hardcopy, recorded, and electronic information on human subjects
that will be a part of the study. All study team members are aware of
the project-specific data regulations and best practices associated
with handling data for the study. These practices are incorporated in
the study protocol and will be detailed in training plans for
interviewers, support staff, and data analytic staff. All staff who
will have access to the data containing PII or PHI information sign a
confidentiality agreement per the requirements of all data use
agreements.
Abt will guarantee this level of restricted access by only using
secure transfer mechanisms, such as Huddle, Abt's FedRAMP Moderate
accredited file transfer service for moving data in and out of the
system, or another secure file transfer system (SFTP) of the
transferring agency's choice. Abt will also only access the data
through its restricted access folder on the Analytic Computing
Environment, ACE 3, which meets NIST SP 800-53 Revision 4 FISMA
Moderate Standards, and utilizes FedRAMP Moderate accredited services
from Amazon as infrastructure.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
For information, assistance, or inquiry about records, contact John
Bravacos, Senior Agency Official for Privacy, at 451 7th Street SW,
Room 10226; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development;
Washington, DC 20410-0001, telephone number 202-6064 (this is not a
toll-free number). When seeking records about yourself from this system
of records or any other Housing and Urban Development (HUD) system of
records, your request must conform with the Privacy Act regulations set
forth in 24 CFR part 16. You must first verify your identity, meaning
that you must provide your full name, address, and date and place of
birth. You must sign your request, and your signature must either be
notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C. 1746, a law that permits
statements to be made, under penalty of perjury, as a substitute for
notarization. If your request is seeking records pertaining to another
living individual, you must include a statement from that individual
certifying their agreement for you to access their records. Without the
above information, the HUD FOIA Office may not conduct an effective
search, and your request may be denied due to lack of specificity or
lack of compliance with regulations.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The Department's rules for contesting contents of records and
appealing initial denials appear in 24 CFR part 16, Procedures for
Inquiries. Additional assistance may be obtained by contacting John
Bravacos, Senior Agency Official for Privacy, at 451 7th Street SW,
Room 10139; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development;
Washington, DC 20410-0001, or the HUD Departmental Privacy Appeals
Officers; Office of General Counsel; U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development; 451 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20410-0001.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking notification of and access to any record
contained in this system of records, or seeking to contest its content,
may submit a request in writing to the component's FOIA Officer, whose
contact
[[Page 10117]]
information can be found at https://www.hud.gov/foia under ``contact.''
if an individual believes more than one component maintains Privacy Act
records concerning him or her the individual may submit the request to
the Chief Privacy Officer, HUD, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room 10139,
Washington, DC 20410.
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
HISTORY:
None.
Dated: March 13, 2019.
John Bravacos,
Senior Agency Official for Privacy.
[FR Doc. 2019-05175 Filed 3-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P