Operators of Boeing Company Model 737-8 and Boeing Company Model 737-9 Airplanes: Emergency Order of Prohibition, 9705-9706 [2019-05067]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 52 / Monday, March 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
section against an Enterprise during any
calendar year not to exceed $163,772.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 7, 2019.
Joseph M. Otting,
Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019–04943 Filed 3–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No.: FAA–2019–0200]
Operators of Boeing Company Model
737–8 and Boeing Company Model
737–9 Airplanes: Emergency Order of
Prohibition
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notification of Emergency Order
of Prohibition.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This Emergency Order of
Prohibition is issued by the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA).
Effective March 13, 2019, this Order
prohibits the operation of Boeing
Company Model 737–8 and Boeing
Company Model 737–9 airplanes by
U.S. certificated operators. This Order
also prohibits the operation of Boeing
Company Model 737–8 and Boeing
Company Model 737–9 series airplanes
in the territory of the United States.
Airplanes covered by this Order, if in
flight at the time this Order is issued,
may proceed to and complete their
soonest planned landing, but may not
again takeoff.
DATES: The Emergency Order of
Prohibition is effective March 13, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Piccola, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification
Service, System Oversight Division,
AIR–800, 2200 South 216th Street, Des
Moines, WA 98198 (Email:
john.piccola@faa.gov; Tel: 206–231–
3595).
The full
text of the Emergency Order of
Prohibition issued March 13, 2019 is set
forth below:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Emergency Order of Prohibition
This Emergency Order of Prohibition
is issued by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 40113(a) and 46105(c). Effective
immediately, this Order prohibits the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Mar 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
9705
operation of Boeing Company Model
737–8 and Boeing Company Model 737–
9 airplanes by U.S. certificated
operators. This Order also prohibits the
operation of Boeing Company Model
737–8 and Boeing Company Model 737–
9 series airplanes in the territory of the
United States. Airplanes covered by this
Order, if in flight at the time this Order
is issued, may proceed to and complete
their soonest planned landing, but may
not again takeoff.
in accordance with 14 CFR 21.191 to
support certification of design changes.
This Order remains in effect until the
issuance of an applicable FAA order
rescinding or modifying this Order. The
Administrator will rescind or modify
this Order, as appropriate, if the
Administrator determines that the
prohibitions prescribed herein are no
longer necessary to address an
emergency related to safety in air
commerce.
Authority
The FAA Administrator promotes the
safe flight of civil aircraft by, among
other things, prescribing minimum
standards for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce. 49
U.S.C. 44701(a)(5). The FAA
Administrator is authorized to take
necessary and appropriate actions to
carry out his aviation safety duties and
powers under part A (‘‘Air Commerce
and Safety’’) of subtitle VII of Title 49
of the United States Code, including
conducting investigations, issuing
orders, and prescribing regulations,
standards, and procedures. 49 U.S.C.
40113(a). When the Administrator
determines that an emergency exists
related to safety in air commerce and
requires immediate action, the
Administrator may issue immediately
effective orders to meet the emergency.
49 U.S.C. 46105(c).
Basis for Order
Based on the initial investigations and
the reliable and credible evidence
presently available, the Acting
Administrator finds that:
1. On October 29, 2018, a Boeing
Company Model 737–8 operated by
Lion Air as flight JT610 crashed after
taking off from Soekarno-Hatta Airport
in Jakarta, Indonesia. Flight JT610
departed from Jakarta with an intended
destination of Pangkal Pinang,
Indonesia. It departed Jakarta at 6:20
a.m. (local time), and crashed into the
Java Sea approximately 13 minutes
later. One hundred and eighty-four
passengers and five crewmembers were
on board. There were no survivors. An
Indonesian-led investigation into the
cause of this accident is ongoing,
supported by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB),
FAA, and Boeing.
2. On March 10, 2019, Ethiopian
Airlines flight ET302, also a Boeing
Company Model 737–8, crashed at 8:44
a.m. (local time), six minutes after
takeoff. The flight departed from Bole
International Airport in Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia with an intended destination of
Nairobi, Kenya. The accident site is near
Bishoftu, Ethiopia. One hundred and
forty-nine passengers and eight
crewmembers were on board. None
survived. An Ethiopian-led
investigation into the cause of this
accident is ongoing, supported by the
NTSB, FAA, and Boeing.
3. The Boeing Company Model 737–
8 and the Boeing Company Model 737–
9 comprise the Boeing 737 MAX series,
sharing nearly identical design features.
The Boeing 737 MAX series airplanes
are narrow-body airplanes with two
high-bypass turbofan engines. The
Boeing 737 MAX series airplanes are
used for passenger carrying operations
and are equipped with new CFM LEAP–
1B engines and larger cockpit displays.
Under 49 U.S.C. 46105(c), the Acting
Administrator has determined that an
emergency exists related to safety in air
commerce. On March 13, 2019, the
investigation of the ET302 crash
developed new information from the
wreckage concerning the aircraft’s
Scope and Effect
This Order applies to all persons
operating the Boeing Company Model
737–8 and Boeing Company Model 737–
9 airplanes in the territory of the United
States, and to U.S. certificated operators
conducting flights with Boeing
Company Model 737–8 and Boeing
Company Model 737–9 airplanes. These
airplanes are hereinafter referred to as
the Boeing 737 MAX series airplanes.
This Order is effective immediately.
This Order prohibits the operation of
Boeing 737 MAX series airplanes by
U.S. certificated operators. This Order
also prohibits the operation of Boeing
737 MAX series airplanes in the
territory of the United States. Boeing
737 MAX series airplanes covered by
this Order, if in flight at the time this
Order is issued, may proceed to and
complete their soonest planned landing,
but may not again takeoff. Special flight
permits may be issued in accordance
with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199,
including to allow non-passenger
carrying flights, as needed, for purposes
of flight to a base for storage, production
flight testing, repairs, alterations, or
maintenance. Experimental
airworthiness certificates may be issued
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
9706
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 52 / Monday, March 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
configuration just after takeoff that,
taken together with newly refined data
from satellite-based tracking of the
aircraft’s flight path, indicates some
similarities between the ET302 and
JT610 accidents that warrant further
investigation of the possibility of a
shared cause for the two incidents that
needs to be better understood and
addressed. Accordingly, the Acting
Administrator is ordering all Boeing 737
MAX airplanes to be grounded pending
further investigation.
This Order is effective immediately.
While this Order remains in effect, the
FAA intends to initiate a proceeding, as
appropriate, to address the factors that
contributed to the two previously
discussed accidents involving Boeing
737 MAX series airplanes.
Consequences of Failure To Comply
With This Order
Emergency Contact Official
Direct any questions concerning this
Emergency Order of Prohibition, to John
Piccola, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification
Service, System Oversight Division,
AIR–800, 2200 South 216th Street, Des
Moines, WA 98198 (email:
john.piccola@faa.gov; Tel: 206–231–
3595).
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 13,
2019.
Daniel K. Elwell,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–05067 Filed 3–13–19; 5:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Any person who fails to comply with
this Order is subject to a civil penalty
for each flight found not to comply.
Small business concerns and
individuals (other than persons serving
as an airman) are subject to a civil
penalty of up to $13,333 per flight. See
49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(5)(A)(ii), 14 CFR
13.301. A person serving as an airman
on a flight operated in violation of this
Order is subject to a civil penalty of up
to $1,466 per flight or a certificate
action, up to and including revocation.
See 49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(1)(B) and
44709(b)(1)(A), 14 CFR 13.301. An air
carrier violating this Order is subject to
certificate action, up to and including
revocation. See id. Any person failing to
comply with this Order may be subject
to a cease and desist order or a civil
action in a United States district court
to ensure compliance. See 49 U.S.C.
44103(a) and 46106.
Right of Review
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 46110(a), a
person with a substantial interest in this
Order ‘‘may apply for review of the
order by filing a petition for review in
the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit or in the
court of appeals of the United States for
the circuit in which the person resides
or has its principal place of business.’’
The petition must be filed within 60
days after the date of this Order. 49
U.S.C. 46110(a).
21 CFR Part 112
RIN 0910–AH93
Standards for the Growing, Harvesting,
Packing, and Holding of Produce for
Human Consumption; Extension of
Compliance Dates for Subpart E
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samir Assar, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–317), Food and
Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr.,
College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–1636.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Analysis and Response to Public
Comments
IV. Economic Analysis of Impacts
V. Analysis of Environmental Impact
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VII. Federalism
VIII. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
IX. References
I. Executive Summary
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0921]
AGENCY:
produce other than sprouts, are delayed
to January 26, 2024, for very small
businesses, January 26, 2023, for small
businesses, and January 26, 2022, for all
other businesses.
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is extending, for covered produce
other than sprouts, the dates for
compliance with the agricultural water
provisions in the ‘‘Standards for the
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and
Holding of Produce for Human
Consumption’’ rule. We are extending
the compliance dates to address
questions about the practical
implementation of compliance with
certain provisions and to consider how
we might further reduce the regulatory
burden or increase flexibility while
continuing to protect public health.
DATES: As of March 18, 2019 the
compliance dates for the agricultural
water provisions (subpart E) in the
Standards for the ‘‘Growing, Harvesting,
Packing, and Holding of Produce for
Human Consumption’’ rule (November
27, 2015, 80 FR 74354), for covered
The final rule extends, for covered
produce other than sprouts, the dates for
compliance with the agricultural water
provisions in the ‘‘Standards for the
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and
Holding of Produce for Human
Consumption’’ rule. The agricultural
water provisions are contained in
subpart E of that rule. We are also
simplifying the compliance date
structure under subpart E as applied to
non-sprout covered produce, while
retaining date-staggering based on size.
The new compliance dates for the
agricultural water requirements in
subpart E for non-sprout covered
produce are January 26, 2024, for very
small businesses; January 26, 2023, for
small businesses; and January 26, 2022,
for all other businesses.
The final rule does not alter the
requirements in subpart E and therefore
the estimated costs and benefits accrued
in any given year of compliance with
the produce safety regulation, relative to
the first year of compliance, do not
change. However, because the
compliance dates for the agricultural
water provisions are extended, the
discounted value of both total costs and
total benefits decrease.
The impact of this final rule is
summarized in the following table.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO BENEFITS AND COSTS AS A RESULT OF THE FINAL RULE
Units
Primary
estimate
Category
Year dollars
Forgone Benefits:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Mar 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Discount rate
(%)
Period
covered
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 52 (Monday, March 18, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9705-9706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05067]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No.: FAA-2019-0200]
Operators of Boeing Company Model 737-8 and Boeing Company Model
737-9 Airplanes: Emergency Order of Prohibition
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notification of Emergency Order of Prohibition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Emergency Order of Prohibition is issued by the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA). Effective March 13, 2019, this Order
prohibits the operation of Boeing Company Model 737-8 and Boeing
Company Model 737-9 airplanes by U.S. certificated operators. This
Order also prohibits the operation of Boeing Company Model 737-8 and
Boeing Company Model 737-9 series airplanes in the territory of the
United States. Airplanes covered by this Order, if in flight at the
time this Order is issued, may proceed to and complete their soonest
planned landing, but may not again takeoff.
DATES: The Emergency Order of Prohibition is effective March 13, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Piccola, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification Service, System Oversight
Division, AIR-800, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198
(Email: john.piccola@faa.gov; Tel: 206-231-3595).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The full text of the Emergency Order of
Prohibition issued March 13, 2019 is set forth below:
Emergency Order of Prohibition
This Emergency Order of Prohibition is issued by the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 40113(a) and
46105(c). Effective immediately, this Order prohibits the operation of
Boeing Company Model 737-8 and Boeing Company Model 737-9 airplanes by
U.S. certificated operators. This Order also prohibits the operation of
Boeing Company Model 737-8 and Boeing Company Model 737-9 series
airplanes in the territory of the United States. Airplanes covered by
this Order, if in flight at the time this Order is issued, may proceed
to and complete their soonest planned landing, but may not again
takeoff.
Authority
The FAA Administrator promotes the safe flight of civil aircraft
by, among other things, prescribing minimum standards for practices,
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in
air commerce. 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5). The FAA Administrator is
authorized to take necessary and appropriate actions to carry out his
aviation safety duties and powers under part A (``Air Commerce and
Safety'') of subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code,
including conducting investigations, issuing orders, and prescribing
regulations, standards, and procedures. 49 U.S.C. 40113(a). When the
Administrator determines that an emergency exists related to safety in
air commerce and requires immediate action, the Administrator may issue
immediately effective orders to meet the emergency. 49 U.S.C. 46105(c).
Scope and Effect
This Order applies to all persons operating the Boeing Company
Model 737-8 and Boeing Company Model 737-9 airplanes in the territory
of the United States, and to U.S. certificated operators conducting
flights with Boeing Company Model 737-8 and Boeing Company Model 737-9
airplanes. These airplanes are hereinafter referred to as the Boeing
737 MAX series airplanes.
This Order is effective immediately. This Order prohibits the
operation of Boeing 737 MAX series airplanes by U.S. certificated
operators. This Order also prohibits the operation of Boeing 737 MAX
series airplanes in the territory of the United States. Boeing 737 MAX
series airplanes covered by this Order, if in flight at the time this
Order is issued, may proceed to and complete their soonest planned
landing, but may not again takeoff. Special flight permits may be
issued in accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199, including to allow
non-passenger carrying flights, as needed, for purposes of flight to a
base for storage, production flight testing, repairs, alterations, or
maintenance. Experimental airworthiness certificates may be issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.191 to support certification of design
changes.
This Order remains in effect until the issuance of an applicable
FAA order rescinding or modifying this Order. The Administrator will
rescind or modify this Order, as appropriate, if the Administrator
determines that the prohibitions prescribed herein are no longer
necessary to address an emergency related to safety in air commerce.
Basis for Order
Based on the initial investigations and the reliable and credible
evidence presently available, the Acting Administrator finds that:
1. On October 29, 2018, a Boeing Company Model 737-8 operated by
Lion Air as flight JT610 crashed after taking off from Soekarno-Hatta
Airport in Jakarta, Indonesia. Flight JT610 departed from Jakarta with
an intended destination of Pangkal Pinang, Indonesia. It departed
Jakarta at 6:20 a.m. (local time), and crashed into the Java Sea
approximately 13 minutes later. One hundred and eighty-four passengers
and five crewmembers were on board. There were no survivors. An
Indonesian-led investigation into the cause of this accident is
ongoing, supported by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB),
FAA, and Boeing.
2. On March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines flight ET302, also a
Boeing Company Model 737-8, crashed at 8:44 a.m. (local time), six
minutes after takeoff. The flight departed from Bole International
Airport in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia with an intended destination of
Nairobi, Kenya. The accident site is near Bishoftu, Ethiopia. One
hundred and forty-nine passengers and eight crewmembers were on board.
None survived. An Ethiopian-led investigation into the cause of this
accident is ongoing, supported by the NTSB, FAA, and Boeing.
3. The Boeing Company Model 737-8 and the Boeing Company Model 737-
9 comprise the Boeing 737 MAX series, sharing nearly identical design
features. The Boeing 737 MAX series airplanes are narrow-body airplanes
with two high-bypass turbofan engines. The Boeing 737 MAX series
airplanes are used for passenger carrying operations and are equipped
with new CFM LEAP-1B engines and larger cockpit displays.
Under 49 U.S.C. 46105(c), the Acting Administrator has determined
that an emergency exists related to safety in air commerce. On March
13, 2019, the investigation of the ET302 crash developed new
information from the wreckage concerning the aircraft's
[[Page 9706]]
configuration just after takeoff that, taken together with newly
refined data from satellite-based tracking of the aircraft's flight
path, indicates some similarities between the ET302 and JT610 accidents
that warrant further investigation of the possibility of a shared cause
for the two incidents that needs to be better understood and addressed.
Accordingly, the Acting Administrator is ordering all Boeing 737 MAX
airplanes to be grounded pending further investigation.
This Order is effective immediately. While this Order remains in
effect, the FAA intends to initiate a proceeding, as appropriate, to
address the factors that contributed to the two previously discussed
accidents involving Boeing 737 MAX series airplanes.
Consequences of Failure To Comply With This Order
Any person who fails to comply with this Order is subject to a
civil penalty for each flight found not to comply. Small business
concerns and individuals (other than persons serving as an airman) are
subject to a civil penalty of up to $13,333 per flight. See 49 U.S.C.
46301(a)(5)(A)(ii), 14 CFR 13.301. A person serving as an airman on a
flight operated in violation of this Order is subject to a civil
penalty of up to $1,466 per flight or a certificate action, up to and
including revocation. See 49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(1)(B) and 44709(b)(1)(A),
14 CFR 13.301. An air carrier violating this Order is subject to
certificate action, up to and including revocation. See id. Any person
failing to comply with this Order may be subject to a cease and desist
order or a civil action in a United States district court to ensure
compliance. See 49 U.S.C. 44103(a) and 46106.
Right of Review
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 46110(a), a person with a substantial
interest in this Order ``may apply for review of the order by filing a
petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit or in the court of appeals of the United
States for the circuit in which the person resides or has its principal
place of business.'' The petition must be filed within 60 days after
the date of this Order. 49 U.S.C. 46110(a).
Emergency Contact Official
Direct any questions concerning this Emergency Order of
Prohibition, to John Piccola, Federal Aviation Administration, Aircraft
Certification Service, System Oversight Division, AIR-800, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198 (email: john.piccola@faa.gov; Tel:
206-231-3595).
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 13, 2019.
Daniel K. Elwell,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-05067 Filed 3-13-19; 5:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P