Notice of Record of Decision for the West Elk Mine Mining Plan Modification, 9554-9556 [2019-04839]
Download as PDF
9554
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2019 / Notices
tributaries, Keechelus Reservoir and its
tributaries, the Kachess River, the
Yakima River between Keechelus Dam
and the Easton Diversion Dam near Lake
Easton, and the electric transmission
line route from near Easton to the
Kachess Reservoir pumping plant. The
extended study area generally includes
the Yakima Project vicinity.
Authority
The Kachess and Keechelus
Reservoirs were authorized on
December 12, 1905, by the Secretary of
the Interior in connection with the
Tieton and Sunnyside Divisions of the
Yakima Project. The Secretary was
acting under authority of the
Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902. The
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement
Project was authorized on December 28,
1979 (93 Stat. 1241, Pub. L. 96–162,
Feasibility Study—Yakima River Basin
Water Enhancement Project). Title XII of
the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water
Rights Settlement Act of 1994 (108 Stat.
4526 Pub. L. 103–434) authorized fish,
wildlife, and recreation as additional
purposes of the Yakima Project.
Public Review of FEIS
Copies of the FEIS are available for
public review at the following locations:
1. Bureau of Reclamation, ColumbiaCascades Area Office, 1917 Marsh Road,
Yakima, Washington 98901.
2. Washington State Department of
Ecology, 15 W Yakima Avenue, Suite
200, Yakima, Washington 98902.
Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Lorri J. Gray,
Regional Director, Pacific Northwest Region.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2019–04295 Filed 3–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
[S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
190S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A00
19XS501520]
Notice of Record of Decision for the
West Elk Mine Mining Plan
Modification
device for the deaf may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
I. Background on the Project
II. Alternatives
III. Environmental Impact Analysis
IV. Decision
The Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE)
announces its decision to adopt the U.S.
Forest Service (USFS) Supplemental
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(SFEIS) for Federal Coal Lease
Modifications COC–1362 and COC–
67232 (including on-lease exploration
plan) at the West Elk Mine located in
Gunnison County, CO. In accordance
with Section 102 of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(‘‘NEPA’’), the Council on
Environmental Quality’s (‘‘CEQ’’)
regulations implementing NEPA, and
other applicable authorities, OSMRE has
conducted an independent review and
evaluation of the USFS’s SFEIS for
Federal Coal Lease Modifications COC–
1362 and COC–67232 (including onlease exploration plan) at the West Elk
Mine dated August 2017.
As a cooperating agency with
responsibility for the Federal Lands
Program and the preparation of mining
plan decision documents for review by
the Assistant Secretary for Land and
Minerals Management (ASLM), OSMRE
provided subject matter expertise to the
USFS during the environmental review
process. Based on its independent
review and evaluation, OSMRE has
determined the SFEIS, including all
supporting documentation, as
incorporated by reference, adequately
assesses and discloses the
environmental impacts for the mining
plan modification, and that adoption of
the 2017 SFEIS by OSMRE is authorized
under 40 CFR 1506.3, Adoption.
Accordingly, OSMRE adopts the 2017
SFEIS, and takes full responsibility for
the scope and content that addresses the
proposed mining plan modification at
West Elk Mine. Documents are available
on OSMRE’s website: https://www.wrcc.
osmre.gov/westElkMine.shtm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about the Project,
contact: Gretchen Pinkham, OSMRE
Project Manager, at 303–293–5088 or by
email at osm-nepa-co@osmre.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
I. Background on the Project
As established by the Mineral Leasing
Act (MLA) of 1920, the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA)
of 1977, as amended (30 U.S.C. 1201–
1328), and the Cooperative Agreement
between the State of Colorado and the
Secretary of the U.S. Department of the
Interior (DOI) in accordance with
Section 523(c) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1273(c)), Mountain Coal Company’s
(MCC) Permit Application Package
(PAP) (also referred to as Permit
Revision 15 (PR 15)) must be reviewed
by OSMRE and a mining plan
modification approved by the Assistant
Secretary for Land and Minerals
Management (ASLM) before MCC may
significantly disturb the environment in
order to develop the Federal Coal Leases
COC–1362 & COC–67232. The Colorado
Division of Reclamation, Mining and
Safety (CDRMS) is the SMCRA
regulatory authority principally
responsible for reviewing and approving
PAPs. Under the MLA, OSMRE is
responsible for making a
recommendation to the ASLM about
whether the proposed mining plan
modification should be approved,
disapproved, or approved with
conditions (30 CFR 476.13). CDRMS
approved the PAP for PR 15 on
September 4, 2018.
It is OSMRE’s decision to adopt the
USFS Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and
Gunnison National Forests (GMUG)
‘‘Federal Coal Lease Modifications
COC–1362 & COC–67232 (including onlease exploration plan)’’ SFEIS (2017),
as allowed under 40 CFR 1506.3.
Consistent with the USFS decision,
OSMRE is selecting Alternative 3, as
described in the SFEIS (Section 2.2.3),
based on the agencies consideration of:
The purpose and need for the action; the
issues; current policies and regulations;
the analysis of alternatives contained in
the SFEIS; public comments received
and other information in the project
record.
Alternative 3 as analyzed in the SFEIS
would modify existing Federal coal
leases COC–1362 and COC–67232 by
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of record of decision.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2019 / Notices
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
adding 800 and 920 additional acres
(respectively). Under Alternative 3, the
E seam would be mined containing
approximately 10 million tons of
recoverable coal. The leases would be
mined using room and pillar
development and longwall retreat
mining recovery methods producing
approximately 4.5 million tons per year
and continuing mining operations by
approximately 3 years. OSMRE received
updated information regarding the
anticipated site locations and surface
disturbance acreage associated with PR–
15 submitted to CDRMS. Under
Alternative 3, approximately 54 acres of
surface disturbance would occur on
both Federal and private lands for the
construction of mine ventilation
boreholes (MVBs) and temporary roads.
OSMRE consulted with the Colorado
State Historic Preservation Officer in
compliance with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) of 1966, as amended (54 U.S.C.
300101–307108), as provided for in 36
CFR part 800.2(d)(3) and providing for
public involvement, as required.
Consultations with Native American
Tribes are being conducted in
accordance with DOI policy.
As part of its consideration of impacts
of the proposed Project on threatened
and endangered species, OSMRE
completed the Section 7 consultation
process under the Endangered Species
Act and received concurrence from
USFWS that they have no concerns on
August 8, 2018, pursuant to Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and its implementing regulations.
In addition to compliance with NEPA,
NHPA Section 106, and ESA Section 7,
all Federal actions will be in
compliance with applicable
requirements of the SMCRA; the CWA,
33 U.S.C. 1251–1387; the Clean Air Act
of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671q; the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990,
as amended, 25 U.S.C. 3001–3013; and
all applicable laws, regulation, and
Executive Order on topics such as
Environmental Justice, Sacred Sites, and
Tribal Consultation.
III. Alternatives
The analysis in the SFEIS considers
direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts
of the Proposed Action and two
Alternatives. Alternatives for the Project
that were analyzed in the SFEIS
include:
(a) Alternative 1—No Action
Alternative: This Alternative was
identified as the environmentally
preferable Alternative. Even though this
is the No Action Alternative, currently
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
permitted temporary road and pad
construction and use would continue
for about ten years under this
alternative. Most of these uses are and
would continue to be in the Sunset
Roadless Area.
(b) Alternative 3—Preferred
Alternative: Alternative 3 as analyzed in
the SFEIS would modify existing
Federal coal leases COC–1362 and COC67232 by adding 800 and 920 additional
acres (respectively). Under Alternative
3, the E seam would be mined
containing approximately 10 million
tons of recoverable coal. The leases
would be mined using underground
longwall mining techniques producing
approximately 4.5 million tons per year
and continuing mining operations by
approximately 3 years (Federal and
private reserves). OSMRE received
updated information regarding the
anticipated site locations and surface
disturbance acreage associated with PR–
15 submitted to CDRMS. Under
Alternative 3, approximately 54 acres of
surface disturbance would occur on
both Federal and private lands for the
construction of MVBs and temporary
roads.
(c) Alternative 4: Under Alternative 4,
the agencies would consent and lease
the proposed modification to COC–1362
only, while not consenting to proposed
modification to lease COC–67232.
Alternative 4 analyzed the effects of
post-lease surface activities under the
Colorado Roadless Rule including
temporary road construction in the
Sunset Colorado Roadless Area, as
described in Alternative 3 above. The
on-lease exploration activities would
remain similar to Alternative 3 except
roads would stop at the lease
modification boundary.
A wide range of additional
Alternatives were considered by
OSMRE but not carried forward for
detailed analysis in the SFEIS. The
following Alternatives were not
analyzed in the SFEIS because they
either did not meet the purpose and
need of the Project or were not
considered technically feasible or
economically feasible or cost-effective:
• Alternative 2; 1
• Helicopter drill Methane Drainage
Wells (MDWs) in roadless area
• MDWs using horizontal boreholes or
directional drilling technology
1 Under which the USFS would consent to and
BLM would modify the leases with stipulations/
notices/addendums above listed for the Action
Alternatives but based on the provisions of the 2001
Roadless Area Conservation Rule (which is no
longer in effect) road construction or reconstruction
was prohibited. Although mining without
construction of temporary roads may be physically
possible, it may be limited by safety, technology,
productivity, and expense (see SFEIS Section 2.3.1).
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9555
Æ Directionally Drill MDWs from
Outside Roadless
Æ Use Horizontal Boreholes or
Longhole Horizontal Boreholes
Consideration of other mining
methods
Mitigate the potential Greenhouse Gas
(GHG) emissions of the project by
requiring MCC to use MDW
ventilation air methane (VAM)
Mitigate the potential GHG emissions
of the project by requiring MCC to
purchase of carbon credits or do offset mitigations
Mitigate the potential GHG emissions
of the project by requiring MCC to
use other potential methane
mitigation measures
Æ Methane Capture to Power On-Site
Heaters
Æ Methane Drainage Well Emissions
Capture
Æ MDW Capture, Electricity
Production
Æ MDW Capture, Sale Gas
Æ Flaring (MDW Emissions)
Æ Thermal Oxidation (VAM & MDW
Emissions)
Prevent all future disturbances from
road construction, methane
drainage well pads and the like in
Roadless Areas
Shrink the boundaries of the lease to
conform to the area where the coal
will be mined underground
Protect values of the area by using this
set of stipulations for the Proposed
Action
Æ No Surface Occupancy (NSO)
stipulations prohibiting road and
MDW well pad construction within
1⁄4 mile of the hiking route known
as ‘‘Sunset Trail,’’ which traverses
the lease modification, to protect
recreational values.
Æ NSO stipulations prohibiting road
and MDW well pad construction for
all areas within 1⁄4 mile of: (a) All
lynx denning habitat; (b) all lynx
winter foraging habitat; and (c) all
lynx foraging habitat which is
adjacent to lynx denning habitat.
Æ NSO stipulations prohibiting road
and MDW well pad construction for
all areas within 1⁄4 mile of a water
influence zone.
Æ NSO stipulations prohibiting road
and MDW well pad construction for
all areas within 1⁄2 mile of the West
Elk Wilderness boundary, to protect
roadless, wildlife, scenic, and other
values.
Æ NSO stipulations prohibiting road
and MDW well pad construction
within 1⁄4 mile of any old growth
forest to prevent fragmentation.
Æ Until the Forest Plan is amended to
address new information about the
threat of climate change, the GMUG
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
9556
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2019 / Notices
should protect existing mature
forest through an NSO stipulation.
Æ NSO stipulations prohibiting road
and MDW well pad construction
within 1⁄2 mile of any raptor nest
site.
Æ NSO stipulations prohibiting road
and MDW well pad construction on
slopes greater than 40% to protect
soils and prevent erosion.
• For Exploration, use helicopters to
transport drill rig
• For Exploration, do not consider
redundant access
• For Exploration, analyze only the
holes proposed to be drilled during
the first field season
III. Environmental Impact Analysis
The SFEIS analyzes the potential
environmental impacts to 18 different
resource categories, including:
• Air Quality
• Climate Change
• Topographic and Physiographic
Environment
• Geology and Soils
• Heritage Resources
• Watershed
• Vegetation
• Threatened and Endangered Species
• Sensitive Species
• Sensitive Plants
• Management Indicator Species
• Migratory Birds
• Range Resources
• Transportation System
• Roadless
• Recreation
• Socioeconomics
• Visual Resources
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
IV. Decision
In consideration of the information
presented above, OSMRE approves the
Record of Decision (ROD) adopting the
USFS GMUG SFEIS and selects
Alternative 3 (Consent to and
Modification of the Leases) as the
Preferred Alternative as described in the
SFEIS (Section 2.2.3). USFS and the
BLM included lease stipulations which
were outlined by each agency in their
RODs to minimize environmental
impacts. On August 10, 2018, United
States District Judge of the United States
District Court for the District of
Colorado, Philip A. Brimmer, found that
the Agencies’ decisions were affirmed in
the High Country Conservation
Advocates v. Forest Service (17–cv–
03025–PAB). OSMRE understands that a
notice of appeal has been submitted;
however, the leases are in effect and it
is appropriate for OSMRE to adopt the
SFEIS. Accordingly, OSMRE
recommends approval without
conditions of the mining plan
modification to the ASLM. This action
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
can be implemented following approval
of the mining plan modification by the
ASLM.
Dated: February 26, 2019.
Marcelo Calle,
Acting Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 2019–04839 Filed 3–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
[S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
190S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A00
19XS501520]
Notice of Availability for the San Juan
Mine Deep Lease Extension Mining
Plan Modification Final Environmental
Impact Statement
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Office
of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement (OSMRE) has prepared a
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the San Juan Coal Company’s
(SJCC) proposed Deep Lease Extension
(DLE) at the existing San Juan Mine
(Project) in San Juan County, New
Mexico. This Notice of Availability
(NOA) serves to notify the public that
the Final EIS has been prepared and is
available for review. In developing the
Final EIS, the OSMRE considered the
public comments received on the Draft
EIS.
ADDRESSES: You can download the Final
EIS at the following OSMRE WR
website: https://www.wrcc.osmre.gov/
sanJuanMine.shtm.
Paper and electronic copies of the
Final EIS are available for review at the
OSMRE Western Region Office, 1999
Broadway Street, Suite 3320, Denver,
Colorado 80202. In addition, a paper
and electronic copy of the Final EIS is
available for review at each of the
following locations:
• Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Farmington Field Office—6251 College
Blvd., Suite A, Farmington, NM 87402.
Between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00
p.m. Monday through Friday (Closed
Saturday and Sunday).
• Navajo Nation Library—Highway
264 Loop Road, Window Rock, AZ
86515. Between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday
(Closed Sunday).
• Albuquerque Main Library—501
Copper Ave. NW, Albuquerque, NM
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
87102. Between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday
(Closed Sunday).
• Cortez Public Library—202 N Park
Street, Cortez, CO 81321. Between the
hours of 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Monday through Thursday; 9:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m. Friday through Saturday
(Closed Sunday).
• Durango Public Library—1900 E
Third Ave., Durango, CO 81301.
Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00
p.m. Monday through Wednesday; 9:00
a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Thursday through
Saturday (Closed Sunday).
• Farmington Public Library—2101
Farmington Ave., Farmington, NM
87401. Between the hours of 9:00 a.m.
and 9:00 p.m. Monday through
Thursday; 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Friday through Saturday; and, 1:00 p.m.
and 5:00 p.m. on Sunday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about the Project
and/or to have your name added to the
mailing list, contact: Gretchen Pinkham,
OSMRE Project Manager, at 303–293–
5088 or by email at osm-nepa-nm@
osmre.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to
contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Project
II. Background on the San Juan Generating
Station
III. Mining Plan Modification for the DLE
IV. Alternatives
V. Environmental Impact Analysis
VI. Public Comment Procedures
I. Background on the Project
As established by the Mineral Leasing
Act (MLA) of 1920, the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA)
of 1977, as amended (30 U.S.C. 1201–
1328), and the Cooperative Agreement
between the State of New Mexico and
the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
the Interior (DOI) in accordance with
Section 523(c) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1273(c)), SJCC’s Permit Application
Package (PAP) must be reviewed by the
OSMRE and a mining plan modification
approved by the Assistant Secretary for
Land and Minerals Management
(ASLM) before SJCC may significantly
disturb the environment in order to
develop the DLE Federal Coal Lease
Tract NM–99144. The NM Mining and
Minerals Division (NM MMD) is the
SMCRA regulatory authority principally
responsible for reviewing and approving
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9554-9556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04839]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
[S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000 190S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A00
19XS501520]
Notice of Record of Decision for the West Elk Mine Mining Plan
Modification
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE) announces its decision to adopt the U.S. Forest Service (USFS)
Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement (SFEIS) for Federal
Coal Lease Modifications COC-1362 and COC-67232 (including on-lease
exploration plan) at the West Elk Mine located in Gunnison County, CO.
In accordance with Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (``NEPA''), the Council on Environmental Quality's (``CEQ'')
regulations implementing NEPA, and other applicable authorities, OSMRE
has conducted an independent review and evaluation of the USFS's SFEIS
for Federal Coal Lease Modifications COC-1362 and COC-67232 (including
on-lease exploration plan) at the West Elk Mine dated August 2017.
As a cooperating agency with responsibility for the Federal Lands
Program and the preparation of mining plan decision documents for
review by the Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
(ASLM), OSMRE provided subject matter expertise to the USFS during the
environmental review process. Based on its independent review and
evaluation, OSMRE has determined the SFEIS, including all supporting
documentation, as incorporated by reference, adequately assesses and
discloses the environmental impacts for the mining plan modification,
and that adoption of the 2017 SFEIS by OSMRE is authorized under 40 CFR
1506.3, Adoption. Accordingly, OSMRE adopts the 2017 SFEIS, and takes
full responsibility for the scope and content that addresses the
proposed mining plan modification at West Elk Mine. Documents are
available on OSMRE's website: https://www.wrcc.osmre.gov/westElkMine.shtm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about the
Project, contact: Gretchen Pinkham, OSMRE Project Manager, at 303-293-
5088 or by email at osm-nepa-co@osmre.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual
during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7
days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Project
II. Alternatives
III. Environmental Impact Analysis
IV. Decision
I. Background on the Project
As established by the Mineral Leasing Act (MLA) of 1920, the
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) of 1977, as amended
(30 U.S.C. 1201-1328), and the Cooperative Agreement between the State
of Colorado and the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior
(DOI) in accordance with Section 523(c) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1273(c)),
Mountain Coal Company's (MCC) Permit Application Package (PAP) (also
referred to as Permit Revision 15 (PR 15)) must be reviewed by OSMRE
and a mining plan modification approved by the Assistant Secretary for
Land and Minerals Management (ASLM) before MCC may significantly
disturb the environment in order to develop the Federal Coal Leases
COC-1362 & COC-67232. The Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and
Safety (CDRMS) is the SMCRA regulatory authority principally
responsible for reviewing and approving PAPs. Under the MLA, OSMRE is
responsible for making a recommendation to the ASLM about whether the
proposed mining plan modification should be approved, disapproved, or
approved with conditions (30 CFR 476.13). CDRMS approved the PAP for PR
15 on September 4, 2018.
It is OSMRE's decision to adopt the USFS Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre
and Gunnison National Forests (GMUG) ``Federal Coal Lease Modifications
COC-1362 & COC-67232 (including on-lease exploration plan)'' SFEIS
(2017), as allowed under 40 CFR 1506.3. Consistent with the USFS
decision, OSMRE is selecting Alternative 3, as described in the SFEIS
(Section 2.2.3), based on the agencies consideration of: The purpose
and need for the action; the issues; current policies and regulations;
the analysis of alternatives contained in the SFEIS; public comments
received and other information in the project record.
Alternative 3 as analyzed in the SFEIS would modify existing
Federal coal leases COC-1362 and COC-67232 by
[[Page 9555]]
adding 800 and 920 additional acres (respectively). Under Alternative
3, the E seam would be mined containing approximately 10 million tons
of recoverable coal. The leases would be mined using room and pillar
development and longwall retreat mining recovery methods producing
approximately 4.5 million tons per year and continuing mining
operations by approximately 3 years. OSMRE received updated information
regarding the anticipated site locations and surface disturbance
acreage associated with PR-15 submitted to CDRMS. Under Alternative 3,
approximately 54 acres of surface disturbance would occur on both
Federal and private lands for the construction of mine ventilation
boreholes (MVBs) and temporary roads.
OSMRE consulted with the Colorado State Historic Preservation
Officer in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended (54 U.S.C. 300101-307108),
as provided for in 36 CFR part 800.2(d)(3) and providing for public
involvement, as required. Consultations with Native American Tribes are
being conducted in accordance with DOI policy.
As part of its consideration of impacts of the proposed Project on
threatened and endangered species, OSMRE completed the Section 7
consultation process under the Endangered Species Act and received
concurrence from USFWS that they have no concerns on August 8, 2018,
pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its implementing regulations.
In addition to compliance with NEPA, NHPA Section 106, and ESA
Section 7, all Federal actions will be in compliance with applicable
requirements of the SMCRA; the CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1251-1387; the Clean Air
Act of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q; the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, as amended, 25 U.S.C.
3001-3013; and all applicable laws, regulation, and Executive Order on
topics such as Environmental Justice, Sacred Sites, and Tribal
Consultation.
III. Alternatives
The analysis in the SFEIS considers direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts of the Proposed Action and two Alternatives.
Alternatives for the Project that were analyzed in the SFEIS include:
(a) Alternative 1--No Action Alternative: This Alternative was
identified as the environmentally preferable Alternative. Even though
this is the No Action Alternative, currently permitted temporary road
and pad construction and use would continue for about ten years under
this alternative. Most of these uses are and would continue to be in
the Sunset Roadless Area.
(b) Alternative 3--Preferred Alternative: Alternative 3 as analyzed
in the SFEIS would modify existing Federal coal leases COC-1362 and
COC- 67232 by adding 800 and 920 additional acres (respectively). Under
Alternative 3, the E seam would be mined containing approximately 10
million tons of recoverable coal. The leases would be mined using
underground longwall mining techniques producing approximately 4.5
million tons per year and continuing mining operations by approximately
3 years (Federal and private reserves). OSMRE received updated
information regarding the anticipated site locations and surface
disturbance acreage associated with PR-15 submitted to CDRMS. Under
Alternative 3, approximately 54 acres of surface disturbance would
occur on both Federal and private lands for the construction of MVBs
and temporary roads.
(c) Alternative 4: Under Alternative 4, the agencies would consent
and lease the proposed modification to COC-1362 only, while not
consenting to proposed modification to lease COC-67232. Alternative 4
analyzed the effects of post-lease surface activities under the
Colorado Roadless Rule including temporary road construction in the
Sunset Colorado Roadless Area, as described in Alternative 3 above. The
on-lease exploration activities would remain similar to Alternative 3
except roads would stop at the lease modification boundary.
A wide range of additional Alternatives were considered by OSMRE
but not carried forward for detailed analysis in the SFEIS. The
following Alternatives were not analyzed in the SFEIS because they
either did not meet the purpose and need of the Project or were not
considered technically feasible or economically feasible or cost-
effective:
Alternative 2; \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under which the USFS would consent to and BLM would modify
the leases with stipulations/notices/addendums above listed for the
Action Alternatives but based on the provisions of the 2001 Roadless
Area Conservation Rule (which is no longer in effect) road
construction or reconstruction was prohibited. Although mining
without construction of temporary roads may be physically possible,
it may be limited by safety, technology, productivity, and expense
(see SFEIS Section 2.3.1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helicopter drill Methane Drainage Wells (MDWs) in roadless
area
MDWs using horizontal boreholes or directional drilling
technology
[cir] Directionally Drill MDWs from Outside Roadless
[cir] Use Horizontal Boreholes or Longhole Horizontal Boreholes
Consideration of other mining methods
Mitigate the potential Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions of the
project by requiring MCC to use MDW ventilation air methane (VAM)
Mitigate the potential GHG emissions of the project by
requiring MCC to purchase of carbon credits or do off-set mitigations
Mitigate the potential GHG emissions of the project by
requiring MCC to use other potential methane mitigation measures
[cir] Methane Capture to Power On-Site Heaters
[cir] Methane Drainage Well Emissions Capture
[cir] MDW Capture, Electricity Production
[cir] MDW Capture, Sale Gas
[cir] Flaring (MDW Emissions)
[cir] Thermal Oxidation (VAM & MDW Emissions)
Prevent all future disturbances from road construction,
methane drainage well pads and the like in Roadless Areas
Shrink the boundaries of the lease to conform to the area
where the coal will be mined underground
Protect values of the area by using this set of stipulations
for the Proposed Action
[cir] No Surface Occupancy (NSO) stipulations prohibiting road and
MDW well pad construction within \1/4\ mile of the hiking route known
as ``Sunset Trail,'' which traverses the lease modification, to protect
recreational values.
[cir] NSO stipulations prohibiting road and MDW well pad
construction for all areas within \1/4\ mile of: (a) All lynx denning
habitat; (b) all lynx winter foraging habitat; and (c) all lynx
foraging habitat which is adjacent to lynx denning habitat.
[cir] NSO stipulations prohibiting road and MDW well pad
construction for all areas within \1/4\ mile of a water influence zone.
[cir] NSO stipulations prohibiting road and MDW well pad
construction for all areas within \1/2\ mile of the West Elk Wilderness
boundary, to protect roadless, wildlife, scenic, and other values.
[cir] NSO stipulations prohibiting road and MDW well pad
construction within \1/4\ mile of any old growth forest to prevent
fragmentation.
[cir] Until the Forest Plan is amended to address new information
about the threat of climate change, the GMUG
[[Page 9556]]
should protect existing mature forest through an NSO stipulation.
[cir] NSO stipulations prohibiting road and MDW well pad
construction within \1/2\ mile of any raptor nest site.
[cir] NSO stipulations prohibiting road and MDW well pad
construction on slopes greater than 40% to protect soils and prevent
erosion.
For Exploration, use helicopters to transport drill rig
For Exploration, do not consider redundant access
For Exploration, analyze only the holes proposed to be drilled
during the first field season
III. Environmental Impact Analysis
The SFEIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts to 18
different resource categories, including:
Air Quality
Climate Change
Topographic and Physiographic Environment
Geology and Soils
Heritage Resources
Watershed
Vegetation
Threatened and Endangered Species
Sensitive Species
Sensitive Plants
Management Indicator Species
Migratory Birds
Range Resources
Transportation System
Roadless
Recreation
Socioeconomics
Visual Resources
IV. Decision
In consideration of the information presented above, OSMRE approves
the Record of Decision (ROD) adopting the USFS GMUG SFEIS and selects
Alternative 3 (Consent to and Modification of the Leases) as the
Preferred Alternative as described in the SFEIS (Section 2.2.3). USFS
and the BLM included lease stipulations which were outlined by each
agency in their RODs to minimize environmental impacts. On August 10,
2018, United States District Judge of the United States District Court
for the District of Colorado, Philip A. Brimmer, found that the
Agencies' decisions were affirmed in the High Country Conservation
Advocates v. Forest Service (17-cv-03025-PAB). OSMRE understands that a
notice of appeal has been submitted; however, the leases are in effect
and it is appropriate for OSMRE to adopt the SFEIS. Accordingly, OSMRE
recommends approval without conditions of the mining plan modification
to the ASLM. This action can be implemented following approval of the
mining plan modification by the ASLM.
Dated: February 26, 2019.
Marcelo Calle,
Acting Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 2019-04839 Filed 3-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P