Agency Information Collection Activities; Implementing Regulations for Petitions, 9549-9551 [2019-04805]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2019 / Notices
ecological damage over many decades
from the presence of invasive mice.
Eradicating house mice would eliminate
the last remaining invasive vertebrate
species on the Refuge, thereby
enhancing the recovery of this unique
and sensitive ecosystem.
Alternatives
We analyzed three alternatives in this
final EIS:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
Alternative A: No-Action Alternative
Under this alternative, we would not
take any action to eradicate mice from
the South Farallon Islands, maintaining
the status quo. Native species and
wilderness would continue to be
impacted by invasive mice. However,
other ongoing invasive species
management programs on the South
Farallon Islands would continue based
on previous agency decisions. Lowintensity mouse control, primarily snaptrapping, currently occurs within and
around the residences and other
buildings on Southeast Farallon Island.
These localized control efforts would
continue under the no-action
alternative, but the mouse population
on the rest of the South Farallon Islands
would not be subject to control efforts.
Under this alternative, we would also
continue management activities focused
on conserving storm-petrels, native
plants, and their habitat on the islands,
including invasive plant control and
storm-petrel nesting habitat
management. The current biosecurity
measures would continue under this
alternative, but these measures still
could leave the Farallones at risk of
additional invasions by non-native
animal species.
Alternative B: Aerial Broadcast of
Brodifacoum-25D Conservation
(Preferred Alternative)
Under this alternative, the project area
would be treated with the rodent bait
Brodifacoum-25D Conservation. This
bait is a cereal grain-based pellet (about
1 gram each) containing the rodenticide
brodifacoum (25 ppm, or 0.0025
percent). Brodifacoum is typically
effective after just one feeding by a
mouse. The primary delivery of the bait
would be through two aerial
applications, with hand baiting and bait
stations as a likely secondary means of
bait delivery in selected areas. Bait
applications would be separated by 10
to 21 days. The applications would take
place between the months of October
and December, with a most likely
application period of November–
December. The overall operational
period is expected to be about six weeks
long. Mitigation measures in this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
alternative consist of avoidance and
minimization actions to limit adverse
impacts to natural and cultural
resources. For example, project timing is
scheduled to occur outside seabird and
marine mammal breeding seasons and
when most wildlife populations are near
annual minimums. We would
implement a comprehensive gull hazing
program in order to minimize the
exposure of gulls to rodent bait. We
would also capture and hold or
translocate raptors present on the
islands just prior to and during bait
application. For precaution, a sample of
Farallon arboreal salamanders (Aneides
lugubris farallonensis) would be
captured and held, then released back
into the wild following bait degradation.
To prevent bait drift into the marine
environment, precision GPS techniques
and a precision bait bucket will be
utilized to keep bait application above
the high tide line. Other mitigation
measures include the possibility of
using bait stations and hand broadcast
of bait in certain high-risk areas,
removing carcasses that may have been
exposed to rodenticide, retrieving or
crushing remaining rodent bait after it is
no longer needed, minimizing wildlife
disturbance during bait application,
minimizing impacts to wilderness by
using the minimum tools necessary for
eradication, and protecting cultural
resources during bait application.
Monitoring of operational, mitigation,
and ecosystem restoration objectives
would be conducted before, during, and
after the proposed mouse eradication. In
addition, in order to minimize the risk
of future rodent invasions, a biosecurity
plan would be implemented prior to
and in conjunction with the proposed
eradication to prevent, detect and
rapidly respond to potential future
rodent incursions.
Alternative C: Aerial Broadcast of
Diphacinone-50 Conservation
Under this alternative, the project area
would be treated with the rodent bait
Diphacinone-50 Conservation. This bait
is a cereal grain-based pellet (about 1–
2 grams each) containing the
rodenticide diphacinone (50 ppm, or
0.0050 percent). Alternative C differs
from Alternative B mainly in the type of
rodenticide used for the proposed
eradication, the number of applications
that may be necessary, and the expected
overall length of the operational period.
To be effective, diphacinone requires
multiple feedings by a mouse over
several days. Under Alternative C,
Diphacinone-50 Conservation would be
broadcast primarily by helicopter, likely
with some hand baiting and bait stations
used in selected areas. The bait
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9549
application would take place between
the months of October and December,
with most likely application in the
November–December period. However,
under Alternative C, we would need to
broadcast a portion of the total amount
of bait required during three
applications, each separated by
approximately 7 days. The overall
operational period is expected to be
about 16 weeks long. Alternative C
would include the same mitigation
measures described under Alternative B,
as well as the monitoring program and
the biosecurity plan.
EPA’s Role in the EIS Process
The EPA is charged, under section
309 of the Clean Air Act, to review all
Federal agencies’ EISs and to comment
on the adequacy and the acceptability of
the environmental impacts of proposed
actions in the EISs.
EPA also serves as the repository for
EISs prepared by Federal agencies and
provides notice of their availability in
the Federal Register. The
Environmental Impact Statement
Database provides information about
EISs prepared by Federal agencies, as
well as EPA’s comments concerning the
EISs. All EISs are filed with EPA, which
publishes a notice of availability on
Fridays in the Federal Register.
The notice of availability is the start
of the 30-day ‘‘wait period’’ for final
EISs, during which agencies are
generally required to wait 30 days
before making a decision on a proposed
action. For more information, see
https://www.epa.gov/nepa. You may
search for EPA comments on EISs, along
with EISs themselves, at https://cdxno
dengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/
action/eis/search.
Paul Souza,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2019–04905 Filed 3–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–HQ–ES–2018–N154; MO# 300030113;
OMB Control Number 1018–0165]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Implementing Regulations
for Petitions
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
9550
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2019 / Notices
proposing to renew an information
collection.
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before May 14,
2019.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on the
information collection request (ICR) by
mail to the Service Information
Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803; or by email to Info_Coll@fws.gov.
Please reference OMB Control Number
1018–0165 in the subject line of your
comments.
DATES:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madonna L. Baucum, Service
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, by email at Info_Coll@fws.gov,
or by telephone at (703) 358–2503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we provide the
general public and other Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on new, proposed, revised,
and continuing collections of
information. This helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. It also helps the
public understand our information
collection requirements and provide the
requested data in the desired format.
We are soliciting comments on the
proposed ICR that is described below.
We are especially interested in public
comment addressing the following
issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to
the proper functions of the Service; (2)
will this information be processed and
used in a timely manner; (3) is the
estimate of burden accurate; (4) how
might the Service enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (5) how might the
Service minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
Abstract: The Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.), specifies the process by
which the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and the National Marine
Fisheries Service (Services, we) make
decisions on listing, delisting, or
changing the status of a listed species,
or revising critical habitat. Any
interested person may submit a written
petition to the Services requesting to
add a species to the Lists of Endangered
and Threatened Wildlife and Plants
(Lists), remove a species from the Lists,
change the listed status of a species, or
revise the boundary of an area
designated as critical habitat. The
petition process is a central feature of
the ESA and serves a beneficial public
purpose.
Petitions
Information collected from petitioners
used to determine whether to list a
species includes:
(1) Petitioner’s name; signature;
address; telephone number; and
association, institution, or business
affiliation;
(2) Scientific and any common name
of the species that is the subject of the
petition;
(3) Clear indication of the
administrative action the petitioner
seeks (e.g., listing of a species or
revision of critical habitat);
(4) Detailed narrative justification for
the recommended administrative action
that contains an analysis of the
supporting information presented;
(5) Literature citations that are
specific enough for the Services to
locate the supporting information cited
by the petition, including page numbers
or chapters, as applicable;
(6) Electronic or hard copies of
supporting materials (e.g., publications,
maps, reports, letters from authorities)
cited in the petition;
(7) For petitions to list, delist, or
reclassify a species:
• Information to establish whether
the subject entity is a ‘‘species’’ as
defined in the ESA;
• Information on the current
geographic range of the species,
including range States or countries; and
• Copies of notification letters to
States (explained in more detail below);
(8) Information on current population
status and trends and estimates of
current population sizes and
distributions, both in captivity and the
wild, if available;
(9) Identification of the factors under
section 4(a)(1) of the ESA that may
affect the species and where these
factors are acting upon the species;
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(10) Whether any or all of the factors
alone or in combination identified in
section 4(a)(1) of the ESA may cause the
species to be an endangered species or
threatened species (i.e., place the
species in danger of extinction now or
in the foreseeable future), and, if so,
how, including a description of the
magnitude and imminence of the threats
to the species and its habitat;
(11) Information on existing
regulatory protections and conservation
activities that States or other parties
have initiated or have put in place that
may protect the species or its habitat;
(12) For petitions to revise critical
habitat:
• Description and map(s) of areas that
the current designation (a) does not
include that should be included or (b)
includes that should no longer be
included, and the rationale for
designating or not designating these
specific areas as critical habitat.
Petitioners should include sufficient
supporting information to substantiate
the requested changes, which may
include GIS data or boundary layers that
relate to the request, if appropriate;
• Description of physical or biological
features essential for the conservation of
the species and whether they may
require special management
considerations or protection;
• For any areas petitioned to be
added to critical habitat within the
geographical area occupied by the
species at the time it was listed,
information indicating that the specific
areas contain the physical or biological
features that are essential to the
conservation of the species and may
require special management
considerations or protection. The
petitioner should also indicate which
specific areas contain which features;
• For any areas petitioned for removal
from currently designated critical
habitat within the geographical area
occupied by the species at the time it
was listed, information indicating that
the specific areas do not contain the
physical or biological features that are
essential to the conservation of the
species, or that these features do not
require special management
consideration or protections; and
• For areas petitioned to be added to
or removed from critical habitat that
were outside the geographical area
occupied by the species at the time it
was listed, information indicating why
the petitioned areas are or are not
essential for the conservation of the
species; and
(13) A complete, balanced
representation of the relevant facts,
including information that may
contradict claims in the petition.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
9551
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2019 / Notices
Notification of States
For petitions to list, delist, or change
the status of a species, or for petitions
to revise critical habitat, petitioners
must provide notice to the State agency
responsible for the management and
conservation of fish, plant, or wildlife
resources in each state where the
species that is the subject of the petition
occurs of their intention to submit a
petition. This notification must be made
at least 30 days prior to submission of
the petition. Copies of the notification
letters must be included with the
petition. States may provide to the
Service whatever information they want
to be considered in the listing decisions.
Title of Collection: Implementing
Regulations for Petitions, 50 CFR
424.14.
OMB Control Number: 1018–0165.
Form Number: None.
Annual
number of
respondents
Requirement
Average
number of
responses
each
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals, businesses, or
organizations.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
Obtain or Retain a Benefit.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: $1,000.00 (for materials,
printing, postage, data equipment
maintenance, etc.).
Average
completion
time per
response
(hours)
Annual
number of
responses
Estimated
annual
burden hours
Petitioner—Prepare and Submit Petitions (50 CFR 424.14(c), (d), (e), and (g)
Individuals ............................................................................
Private Sector ......................................................................
10
40
1
1
10
40
120
120
1,200
4,800
Petitioner—Notify States (50 CFR 424)
Individuals ............................................................................
Private Sector ......................................................................
100
400
1
1
100
400
1
1
100
400
Totals: ..................................................................................
550
........................
550
........................
6,500
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Dated: March 11, 2019.
Madonna Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–04805 Filed 3–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–ES–2019–N021;
FXES11140400000–178–FF04EF2000]
Receipt of Incidental Take Permit
Application and Proposed Habitat
Conservation Plan for the Sand Skink
and Blue-Tailed Mole Skink, Polk
County, FL; Categorical Exclusion
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments and information.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce receipt of
an application from Nucor Steel Florida,
Inc. (applicant), for an incidental take
permit (ITP) under the Endangered
Species Act. The applicant requests the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
ITP to take the federally listed sand
skink and blue-tailed mole skink
incidental to construction in Polk
County, Florida. We request public
comment on the application, which
includes the applicant’s proposed
habitat conservation plan (HCP) and the
Service’s preliminary determination that
this HCP qualifies as ‘‘low-effect,’’
categorically excluded under the
National Environmental Policy Act. To
make this determination, we used our
environmental action statement and
low-effect screening form, both of which
are also available for public review.
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on or before April 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may
obtain copies of the documents by any
of the following methods:
• Telephone: Alfredo Begazo, 772–
469–4234.
• Email: alfredo_begazo@fws.gov.
• U.S. mail: Alfredo Begazo, South
Florida Ecological Services Office, Attn
Nucor Steel Florida, Inc., Permit
TE12906D, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach,
FL 32960–3559.
• In-person: The documents may be
reviewed by appointment during normal
business hours at the above address.
Please call to make an appointment.
• Fax: Alfredo Begazo, 772–562–
4288.
Submitting Comments: If you wish to
submit comments on any of the
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
documents, you may do so in writing
via the above email address, U.S. mail
address, or fax number, or you may
hand-deliver comments to the above
address during regular business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alfredo Begazo, by U.S. mail (see
ADDRESSES) or via phone at 772–469–
4234. Individuals who are hearing
impaired or speech impaired may call
the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
announce receipt of an application from
Nucor Steel Florida, Inc. (applicant), for
an incidental take permit (ITP) under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
The applicant requests the ITP to take
the federally listed sand skink (Neoseps
reynoldsi) and blue-tailed mole skink
(Eumeces egregious) (skinks) incidental
to the construction of a metal recycling
steel plant (project) in Polk County,
Florida. We request public comment on
the application, which includes the
applicant’s proposed habitat
conservation plan (HCP) and the
Service’s preliminary determination that
this HCP qualifies as ‘‘low-effect,’’
categorically excluded under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). To make
this determination, we used our
environmental action statement and
low-effect screening form, both of which
are also available for public review.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9549-9551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04805]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-HQ-ES-2018-N154; MO# 300030113; OMB Control Number 1018-0165]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Implementing
Regulations for Petitions
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are
[[Page 9550]]
proposing to renew an information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
May 14, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on the information collection request
(ICR) by mail to the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041-3803; or by email to Info_Coll@fws.gov. Please
reference OMB Control Number 1018-0165 in the subject line of your
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madonna L. Baucum, Service Information
Collection Clearance Officer, by email at Info_Coll@fws.gov, or by
telephone at (703) 358-2503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, we provide the general public and other Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on new, proposed, revised, and
continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact
of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's
reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information
collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired
format.
We are soliciting comments on the proposed ICR that is described
below. We are especially interested in public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Service; (2) will this information be processed and
used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4)
how might the Service enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how might the Service minimize the
burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use
of information technology.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other personal identifying information in
your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available
at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Abstract: The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), specifies the process by which the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (Services,
we) make decisions on listing, delisting, or changing the status of a
listed species, or revising critical habitat. Any interested person may
submit a written petition to the Services requesting to add a species
to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists),
remove a species from the Lists, change the listed status of a species,
or revise the boundary of an area designated as critical habitat. The
petition process is a central feature of the ESA and serves a
beneficial public purpose.
Petitions
Information collected from petitioners used to determine whether to
list a species includes:
(1) Petitioner's name; signature; address; telephone number; and
association, institution, or business affiliation;
(2) Scientific and any common name of the species that is the
subject of the petition;
(3) Clear indication of the administrative action the petitioner
seeks (e.g., listing of a species or revision of critical habitat);
(4) Detailed narrative justification for the recommended
administrative action that contains an analysis of the supporting
information presented;
(5) Literature citations that are specific enough for the Services
to locate the supporting information cited by the petition, including
page numbers or chapters, as applicable;
(6) Electronic or hard copies of supporting materials (e.g.,
publications, maps, reports, letters from authorities) cited in the
petition;
(7) For petitions to list, delist, or reclassify a species:
Information to establish whether the subject entity is a
``species'' as defined in the ESA;
Information on the current geographic range of the
species, including range States or countries; and
Copies of notification letters to States (explained in
more detail below);
(8) Information on current population status and trends and
estimates of current population sizes and distributions, both in
captivity and the wild, if available;
(9) Identification of the factors under section 4(a)(1) of the ESA
that may affect the species and where these factors are acting upon the
species;
(10) Whether any or all of the factors alone or in combination
identified in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA may cause the species to be an
endangered species or threatened species (i.e., place the species in
danger of extinction now or in the foreseeable future), and, if so,
how, including a description of the magnitude and imminence of the
threats to the species and its habitat;
(11) Information on existing regulatory protections and
conservation activities that States or other parties have initiated or
have put in place that may protect the species or its habitat;
(12) For petitions to revise critical habitat:
Description and map(s) of areas that the current
designation (a) does not include that should be included or (b)
includes that should no longer be included, and the rationale for
designating or not designating these specific areas as critical
habitat. Petitioners should include sufficient supporting information
to substantiate the requested changes, which may include GIS data or
boundary layers that relate to the request, if appropriate;
Description of physical or biological features essential
for the conservation of the species and whether they may require
special management considerations or protection;
For any areas petitioned to be added to critical habitat
within the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it was
listed, information indicating that the specific areas contain the
physical or biological features that are essential to the conservation
of the species and may require special management considerations or
protection. The petitioner should also indicate which specific areas
contain which features;
For any areas petitioned for removal from currently
designated critical habitat within the geographical area occupied by
the species at the time it was listed, information indicating that the
specific areas do not contain the physical or biological features that
are essential to the conservation of the species, or that these
features do not require special management consideration or
protections; and
For areas petitioned to be added to or removed from
critical habitat that were outside the geographical area occupied by
the species at the time it was listed, information indicating why the
petitioned areas are or are not essential for the conservation of the
species; and
(13) A complete, balanced representation of the relevant facts,
including information that may contradict claims in the petition.
[[Page 9551]]
Notification of States
For petitions to list, delist, or change the status of a species,
or for petitions to revise critical habitat, petitioners must provide
notice to the State agency responsible for the management and
conservation of fish, plant, or wildlife resources in each state where
the species that is the subject of the petition occurs of their
intention to submit a petition. This notification must be made at least
30 days prior to submission of the petition. Copies of the notification
letters must be included with the petition. States may provide to the
Service whatever information they want to be considered in the listing
decisions.
Title of Collection: Implementing Regulations for Petitions, 50 CFR
424.14.
OMB Control Number: 1018-0165.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: Individuals, businesses, or
organizations.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain a Benefit.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: $1,000.00 (for
materials, printing, postage, data equipment maintenance, etc.).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Average number completion Estimated
Requirement Annual number of responses Annual number time per annual burden
of respondents each of responses response hours
(hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petitioner--Prepare and Submit Petitions (50 CFR 424.14(c), (d), (e), and (g)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individuals..................... 10 1 10 120 1,200
Private Sector.................. 40 1 40 120 4,800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petitioner--Notify States (50 CFR 424)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individuals..................... 100 1 100 1 100
Private Sector.................. 400 1 400 1 400
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals:......................... 550 .............. 550 .............. 6,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Dated: March 11, 2019.
Madonna Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-04805 Filed 3-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
