Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2019; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; Quality Payment Program; Medicaid Promoting Interoperability Program; Quality Payment Program-Extreme and Uncontrollable Circumstance Policy for the 2019 MIPS Payment Year; Provisions From the Medicare Shared Savings Program-Accountable Care Organizations-Pathways to Success; and Expanding the Use of Telehealth Services for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Under the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention That Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT) for Patients and Communities Act; Correction, 9460-9463 [2019-04803]

Agencies

• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
• DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9460-9463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04803]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Parts 405, 410, 411, 414, 415, 425, and 495

[CMS-1693-CN2]
RIN 0938-AT31


Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the 
Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2019; 
Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; Quality Payment Program; 
Medicaid Promoting Interoperability Program; Quality Payment Program--
Extreme and Uncontrollable Circumstance Policy for the 2019 MIPS 
Payment Year; Provisions From the Medicare Shared Savings Program--
Accountable Care Organizations--Pathways to Success; and Expanding the 
Use of Telehealth Services for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder 
Under the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention That Promotes Opioid 
Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT) for Patients and Communities Act; 
Correction

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects technical errors in the ``Evaluation 
and Management Services'' provisions that appeared in the final rule 
with comment period published in the Federal Register on November 23, 
2018, concerning changes to the Medicare physician fee schedule (PFS) 
and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment 
systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the 
relative value of services, as well as changes in the statute.

DATES: These corrections are effective on March 14, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Jamie Hermansen, (410) 786-2064, for any physician payment issues 
not identified below.
    Michael Soracoe, (410) 786-6312, for issues related to relative 
value units (RVUs).
    Lindsey Baldwin, (410) 786-1694, and Emily Yoder, (410) 786-1804, 
for issues related to communication technology-based services.
    Pamela West, (410) 786-2302, for issues related to therapy 
services.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 9461]]

I. Background

    In FR Rule Doc. No. 2018-24170, published November 23, 2018 (83 FR 
59452 through 60303), there were a number of technical errors that are 
identified and corrected in the Correction of Errors section below. The 
provisions in this correction document are effective as if they had 
been included in the document published November 23, 2018. Accordingly, 
the corrections are effective January 1, 2019.

II. Summary of Errors

    Due to a technical error, on page 59454, in the second column, 
following the first full paragraph, we inadvertently did not include 
the heading for Section II. of the preamble ``Provisions of the Final 
Rule and Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments for PFS'', and 
the subsection heading and preamble language for ``A. Background''. 
This subsection provides background information regarding Medicare 
payment for physicians' services under the PFS. We are correcting this 
error by adding the language described below in section IV. 1. of this 
correction notice, to page 59454, in the second column, following the 
first partial paragraph.
    Due to a technical error, the RVUs associated with the 53 modifier 
(discontinued procedures) for CPT codes 44388 and 45378 and HCPCS codes 
G0105 and G0121 were inadvertently not calculated at half of the RVUs 
for their respective non-53 modifier codes. The RVUs that result from 
the correction of this error are reflected in the updated Addendum B 
available on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeeSched/PFS-Federal-Regulation-Notices.html.
    On page 59575, column 3, 3rd full paragraph, we incorrectly stated 
that CPT code 99457 could not be furnished by auxiliary personnel, and 
instead must be performed by the billing practitioner. CPT code 99457 
may be furnished by auxiliary personnel, incident to the billing 
practitioner's professional services.
    On page 60070, column 3, 1st full paragraph, in our discussion of 
quantifying burden reduction for therapy services related to the 
discontinuation of functional reporting, we incorrectly referenced 
section II.M. rather than section II.L. of the final rule.

III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking

    We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the 
Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the 
provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we 
can waive this notice and comment procedure if the Secretary finds, for 
good cause, that the notice and comment process is impracticable, 
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a 
statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice.
    Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in 
effective date of final rules after the date of their publication in 
the Federal Register. This 30-day delay in effective date can be 
waived, however, if an agency finds for good cause that the delay is 
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and the 
agency incorporates a statement of the findings and its reasons in the 
rule issued.
    We find it unnecessary to undertake notice and comment rulemaking 
because this notice merely provides technical corrections to the 
regulations. Therefore, we find good cause to waive notice and comment 
procedures.

IV. Correction of Errors

    In FR Rule Doc. No. 2018-24170, appearing on page 59452 in the 
Federal Register of Friday, November 23, 2018, make the following 
corrections:
    1. On page 59454, in the second column; following the first full 
paragraph, we are adding the following language.

``II. Provisions of the Final Rule and Analysis of and Responses to 
Public Comments for PFS

A. Background

    Since January 1, 1992, Medicare has paid for physicians' services 
under section 1848 of the Act, ``Payment for Physicians' Services.'' 
The PFS relies on national relative values that are established for 
work, practice expense (PE), and malpractice (MP), which are adjusted 
for geographic cost variations. These values are multiplied by a 
conversion factor (CF) to convert the relative value units (RVUs) into 
payment rates. The concepts and methodology underlying the PFS were 
enacted as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (Pub. 
L. 101-239, enacted on December 19, 1989) (OBRA '89), and the Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508, enacted on November 
5, 1990) (OBRA '90). The final rule published on November 25, 1991 (56 
FR 59502) set forth the first fee schedule used for payment for 
physicians' services.
    We note that throughout this major final rule, unless otherwise 
noted, the term ``practitioner'' is used to describe both physicians 
and nonphysician practitioners (NPPs) who are permitted to bill 
Medicare under the PFS for the services they furnish to Medicare 
beneficiaries.
1. Development of the Relative Values
a. Work RVUs
    The work RVUs established for the initial fee schedule, which was 
implemented on January 1, 1992, were developed with extensive input 
from the physician community. A research team at the Harvard School of 
Public Health developed the original work RVUs for most codes under a 
cooperative agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services 
(HHS). In constructing the code-specific vignettes used in determining 
the original physician work RVUs, Harvard worked with panels of 
experts, both inside and outside the federal government, and obtained 
input from numerous physician specialty groups.
    As specified in section 1848(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the work 
component of physicians' services means the portion of the resources 
used in furnishing the service that reflects physician time and 
intensity. We establish work RVUs for new, revised and potentially 
misvalued codes based on our review of information that generally 
includes, but is not limited to, recommendations received from the 
American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale 
Update Committee (RUC), the Health Care Professionals Advisory 
Committee (HCPAC), the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), 
and other public commenters; medical literature and comparative 
databases; as well as a comparison of the work for other codes within 
the Medicare PFS, and consultation with other physicians and health 
care professionals within CMS and the federal government. We also 
assess the methodology and data used to develop the recommendations 
submitted to us by the RUC and other public commenters, and the 
rationale for their recommendations. In the CY 2011 PFS final rule with 
comment period (75 FR 73328 through 73329), we discussed a variety of 
methodologies and approaches used to develop work RVUs, including 
survey data, building blocks, crosswalk to key reference or similar 
codes, and magnitude estimation. More information on these issues is 
available in that rule.

[[Page 9462]]

b. Practice Expense RVUs
    Initially, only the work RVUs were resource-based, and the PE and 
MP RVUs were based on average allowable charges. Section 121 of the 
Social Security Act Amendments of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-432, enacted on 
October 31, 1994), amended section 1848(c)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act and 
required us to develop resource-based PE RVUs for each physicians' 
service beginning in 1998. We were required to consider general 
categories of expenses (such as office rent and wages of personnel, but 
excluding MP expenses) comprising PEs. The PE RVUs continue to 
represent the portion of these resources involved in furnishing PFS 
services.
    Originally, the resource-based method was to be used beginning in 
1998, but section 4505(a) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 
105-33, enacted on August 5, 1997) (BBA) delayed implementation of the 
resource-based PE RVU system until January 1, 1999. In addition, 
section 4505(b) of the BBA provided for a 4-year transition period from 
the charge-based PE RVUs to the resource-based PE RVUs.
    We established the resource-based PE RVUs for each physicians' 
service in the November 2, 1998 final rule (63 FR 58814), effective for 
services furnished in CY 1999. Based on the requirement to transition 
to a resource-based system for PE over a 4-year period, payment rates 
were not fully based upon resource-based PE RVUs until CY 2002. This 
resource-based system was based on two significant sources of actual PE 
data: The Clinical Practice Expert Panel (CPEP) data; and the AMA's 
Socioeconomic Monitoring System (SMS) data. These data sources are 
described in greater detail in the CY 2012 PFS final rule with comment 
period (76 FR 73033).
    Separate PE RVUs are established for services furnished in facility 
settings, such as a hospital outpatient department (HOPD) or an 
ambulatory surgical center (ASC), and in nonfacility settings, such as 
a physician's office. The nonfacility RVUs reflect all of the direct 
and indirect PEs involved in furnishing a service described by a 
particular HCPCS code. The difference, if any, in these PE RVUs 
generally results in a higher payment in the nonfacility setting 
because in the facility settings some costs are borne by the facility. 
Medicare's payment to the facility (such as the outpatient prospective 
payment system (OPPS) payment to the HOPD) would reflect costs 
typically incurred by the facility. Thus, payment associated with those 
facility resources is not made under the PFS.
    Section 212 of the Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 
106-113, enacted on November 29, 1999) (BBRA) directed the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to establish a process under 
which we accept and use, to the maximum extent practicable and 
consistent with sound data practices, data collected or developed by 
entities and organizations to supplement the data we normally collect 
in determining the PE component. On May 3, 2000, we published the 
interim final rule (65 FR 25664) that set forth the criteria for the 
submission of these supplemental PE survey data. The criteria were 
modified in response to comments received, and published in the Federal 
Register (65 FR 65376) as part of a November 1, 2000 final rule. The 
PFS final rules published in 2001 and 2003, respectively, (66 FR 55246 
and 68 FR 63196) extended the period during which we would accept these 
supplemental data through March 1, 2005.
    In the CY 2007 PFS final rule with comment period (71 FR 69624), we 
revised the methodology for calculating direct PE RVUs from the top-
down to the bottom-up methodology beginning in CY 2007. We adopted a 4-
year transition to the new PE RVUs. This transition was completed for 
CY 2010. In the CY 2010 PFS final rule with comment period, we updated 
the practice expense per hour (PE/HR) data that are used in the 
calculation of PE RVUs for most specialties (74 FR 61749). In CY 2010, 
we began a 4-year transition to the new PE RVUs using the updated PE/HR 
data, which was completed for CY 2013.
c. Malpractice RVUs
    Section 4505(f) of the BBA amended section 1848(c) of the Act to 
require that we implement resource-based MP RVUs for services furnished 
on or after CY 2000. The resource-based MP RVUs were implemented in the 
PFS final rule with comment period published November 2, 1999 (64 FR 
59380). The MP RVUs are based on commercial and physician-owned 
insurers' MP insurance premium data from all the states, the District 
of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. For more information on MP RVUs, see 
section II.C. of this final rule.
d. Refinements to the RVUs
    Section 1848(c)(2)(B)(i) of the Act requires that we review RVUs no 
less often than every 5 years. Prior to CY 2013, we conducted periodic 
reviews of work RVUs and PE RVUs independently. We completed 5-year 
reviews of work RVUs that were effective for calendar years 1997, 2002, 
2007, and 2012.
    Although refinements to the direct PE inputs initially relied 
heavily on input from the RUC Practice Expense Advisory Committee 
(PEAC), the shifts to the bottom-up PE methodology in CY 2007 and to 
the use of the updated PE/HR data in CY 2010 have resulted in 
significant refinements to the PE RVUs in recent years.
    In the CY 2012 PFS final rule with comment period (76 FR 73057), we 
finalized a proposal to consolidate reviews of work and PE RVUs under 
section 1848(c)(2)(B) of the Act and reviews of potentially misvalued 
codes under section 1848(c)(2)(K) of the Act into one annual process.
    In addition to the 5-year reviews, beginning for CY 2009, CMS and 
the RUC identified and reviewed a number of potentially misvalued codes 
on an annual basis based on various identification screens. This annual 
review of work and PE RVUs for potentially misvalued codes was 
supplemented by the amendments to section 1848 of the Act, as enacted 
by section 3134 of the Affordable Care Act, that require the agency to 
periodically identify, review and adjust values for potentially 
misvalued codes.
e. Application of Budget Neutrality to Adjustments of RVUs
    As described in section VII. of this final rule, in accordance with 
section 1848(c)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Act, if revisions to the RVUs 
cause expenditures for the year to change by more than $20 million, we 
make adjustments to ensure that expenditures do not increase or 
decrease by more than $20 million.
2. Calculation of Payments Based on RVUs
    To calculate the payment for each service, the components of the 
fee schedule (work, PE, and MP RVUs) are adjusted by geographic 
practice cost indices (GPCIs) to reflect the variations in the costs of 
furnishing the services. The GPCIs reflect the relative costs of work, 
PE, and MP in an area compared to the national average costs for each 
component. Please refer to the CY 2017 PFS final rule with comment 
period for a discussion of the last GPCI update (81 FR 80261 through 
80270).
    RVUs are converted to dollar amounts through the application of a 
CF, which is calculated based on a statutory formula by CMS's Office of 
the Actuary (OACT). The formula for calculating the Medicare PFS 
payment amount for a

[[Page 9463]]

given service and fee schedule area can be expressed as:

Payment = [(RVU work x GPCI work) + (RVU PE x GPCI PE) + (RVU MP x GPCI 
MP)] x CF
3. Separate Fee Schedule Methodology for Anesthesia Services
    Section 1848(b)(2)(B) of the Act specifies that the fee schedule 
amounts for anesthesia services are to be based on a uniform relative 
value guide, with appropriate adjustment of an anesthesia CF, in a 
manner to ensure that fee schedule amounts for anesthesia services are 
consistent with those for other services of comparable value. 
Therefore, there is a separate fee schedule methodology for anesthesia 
services. Specifically, we establish a separate CF for anesthesia 
services and we utilize the uniform relative value guide, or base 
units, as well as time units, to calculate the fee schedule amounts for 
anesthesia services. Since anesthesia services are not valued using 
RVUs, a separate methodology for locality adjustments is also 
necessary. This involves an adjustment to the national anesthesia CF 
for each payment locality.''
    2. On page 59575, column 3, 3rd full paragraph we are removing the 
sentence, ``We note that CPT code 99457 describes professional time and 
therefore cannot be furnished by auxiliary personnel incident to a 
practitioner's professional services.'' and adding in its place, ``We 
thank commenters and confirm that these services may be furnished by 
auxiliary personnel incident to a practitioner's professional 
service.''
    3. On page 60070, in the 3rd column; in the first full paragraph, 
in the section heading, 3. Outpatient Therapy Services; line 1, we are 
correcting the section reference in the sentence, ``As noted in section 
II.M. of this final rule,'' to read ``As noted in section II.L. of this 
final rule,''.

    Dated: March 5, 2019.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human 
Services.
[FR Doc. 2019-04803 Filed 3-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P