Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation System for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders and Conditions, 9228-9230 [2019-04709]
Download as PDF
9228
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in part 814, subparts A
through E, regarding premarket
approval, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0231; the
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120; the collections of
information in part 820, regarding
quality system regulation, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0073; and the collections of
information in 21 CFR parts 801 and
809, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is
amended as follows:
PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND
MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 866
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 866.3985 to subpart D to read
as follows:
■
§ 866.3985 Device to detect and identify
microorganisms and associated resistance
marker nucleic acids directly in respiratory
specimens.
(a) Identification. A device to detect
and identify microorganisms and
associated resistance marker nucleic
acids directly from respiratory
specimens is an in vitro diagnostic
device intended for the detection and
identification of microorganisms and
associated resistance markers in
respiratory specimens collected from
patients with signs or symptoms of
respiratory infection. The device is
intended to aid in the diagnosis of
respiratory infection in conjunction
with clinical signs and symptoms and
other laboratory findings. These devices
do not provide confirmation of
antibiotic susceptibility since
mechanisms of resistance may exist
other than those detected by the device.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The intended use for the 21 CFR
809.10 labeling must include a detailed
description of what the device detects,
the type of results provided to the user,
the clinical indications appropriate for
test use, and the specific population(s)
for which the device is intended.
(2) The 21 CFR 809.10(b) labeling
must include:
(i) A detailed device description,
including all device components,
control elements incorporated into the
test procedure, instrument
requirements, ancillary reagents
required but not provided, and a
detailed explanation of the
methodology, including all preanalytical methods for processing of
specimens.
(ii) Performance characteristics from
analytical studies, including, but not
limited to, limit of detection,
inclusivity, reproducibility, cross
reactivity, interfering substances,
competitive inhibition, carryover/cross
contamination, specimen stability, and
linearity, as applicable.
(iii) A limiting statement that the
device is intended to be used in
conjunction with clinical history, signs
and symptoms, and results of other
diagnostic tests, including culture and
antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
(iv) A detailed explanation of the
interpretation of test results for clinical
specimens and acceptance criteria for
any quality control testing.
(v) A limiting statement that negative
results for microorganisms do not
preclude the possibility of infection,
and should not be used as the sole basis
for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient
management decisions.
(vi) If applicable, a limiting statement
that detected microorganisms may not
be the cause of lower respiratory tract
infection and may be indicative of
colonizing or normal respiratory flora.
(vii) If applicable, a limiting statement
that detection of resistance markers
cannot be definitively linked to specific
microorganisms and that the source of a
detected resistance marker may be an
organism not detected by the assay,
including colonizing flora.
(viii) If applicable, a limiting
statement that detection of antibiotic
resistance markers may not correlate
with phenotypic gene expression.
(3) The 21 CFR 809.10(b) labeling and
any test report generated by the device
must include a limiting statement that
negative results for resistance markers
do not indicate susceptibility of
detected microorganisms.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(4) Design verification and validation
must include:
(i) Performance characteristics from
clinical studies that include prospective
(sequential) samples and, if appropriate,
additional characterized samples. The
study must be performed on a study
population consistent with the intended
use population and compare the device
performance to results obtained from an
FDA accepted reference method and/or
FDA accepted comparator method, as
appropriate. Results from the clinical
studies must include the clinical study
protocol (including predefined
statistical analysis plan, if applicable),
clinical study report, and results of all
statistical analyses.
(ii) A detailed device description
including the following:
(A) Thorough description of the assay
methodology including, but not limited
to, primer/probe sequences, primer/
probe design, and rationale for target
sequence selection, as applicable.
(B) Algorithm used to generate a final
result from raw data (e.g., how raw
signals are converted into a reported
result).
(iii) A detailed description of device
software, including, but not limited to,
validation activities and outcomes.
(iv) As part of the risk management
activities, an appropriate end user
device training program must be offered
as an effort to mitigate the risk of failure
from user error.
Dated: March 8, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–04719 Filed 3–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA–2019–N–0396]
Medical Devices; Neurological
Devices; Classification of the
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
System for Neurological and
Psychiatric Disorders and Conditions
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the transcranial magnetic
stimulation system for neurological and
psychiatric disorders and conditions
into class II (special controls). The
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
transcranial magnetic stimulation
system for neurological and psychiatric
disorders and conditions’ classification.
We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
We believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens.
DATES: This order is effective March 14,
2019. The classification was applicable
on August 16, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Doucet, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1535, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6474,
John.Doucet@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
transcranial magnetic stimulation
system for neurological and psychiatric
disorders and conditions as class II
(special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. In
addition, we believe this action will
enhance patients’ access to beneficial
innovation, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens by placing the
device into a lower device class than the
automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act to a
predicate device that does not require
premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(i)). We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a
predicate by means of the procedures
for premarket notification under section
510(k) (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) of the FD&C
Act and part 807 (21 CFR part 807)
respectively.
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
device sponsors do not have to submit
a De Novo request or premarket
approval application in order to market
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9229
a substantially equivalent device (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On September 29, 2017, Brainsway
Ltd. submitted a request for De Novo
classification of the Brainsway Deep
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
System. FDA reviewed the request in
order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on August 16, 2018, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 882.5802. We
have named the generic type of device
transcranial magnetic stimulation
system for neurological and psychiatric
disorders and conditions, and it is
identified as a prescription, nonimplantable device that uses brief
duration, rapidly alternating, or pulsed,
magnetic fields to induce neural activity
in the cerebral cortex. It is not intended
for applying or focusing magnetic fields
towards brain areas outside cerebral
cortex (e.g., cerebellum). A repetitive
transcranial magnetic stimulation
system that is intended to treat major
depressive disorder is classified in
§ 882.5805. A transcranial magnetic
stimulation system for headache is
classified in § 882.5808.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
9230
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION SYSTEM FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS AND
CONDITIONS RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Seizure ......................................................................................................
Thermal injury ...........................................................................................
Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
Non-clinical performance testing; Thermal safety testing; Electrical
safety testing; Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis;
and Labeling.
Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
Labeling.
Hearing loss ..............................................................................................
Scalp discomfort, dizziness, nausea, pain in neck or jaw, headache, or
other adverse effects due to treatment.
Adverse tissue reaction ............................................................................
Electrical shock .........................................................................................
Device failure due to interference with other devices ..............................
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. In order for
a device to fall within this classification,
and thus avoid automatic classification
in class III, it would have to comply
with the special controls named in this
final order. The necessary special
controls appear in the regulation
codified by this order. This device is
subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act.
At the time of classification,
transcranial magnetic stimulation
systems for neurological and psychiatric
disorders and conditions are for
prescription use only. Prescription
devices are exempt from the
requirement for adequate directions for
use for the layperson under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR
801.5, as long as the conditions of 21
CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21
U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
Biocompatibility evaluation, and Labeling.
Electrical safety testing, and Labeling.
Electromagnetic compatibility testing, Electrical safety testing, and Labeling.
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in part 820, regarding
quality system regulation, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0073; the collections of
information in part 814, subparts A
through E, regarding premarket
approval, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0231; the
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120; and the collections of
information in part 801, regarding
labeling, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 882 is
amended as follows:
PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 882
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 882.5802 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
§ 882.5802 Transcranial magnetic
stimulation system for neurological and
psychiatric disorders and conditions.
(a) Identification. A transcranial
magnetic stimulation system for
neurological and psychiatric disorders
and conditions is a prescription, nonimplantable device that uses brief
duration, rapidly alternating, or pulsed,
magnetic fields to induce neural activity
in the cerebral cortex. It is not intended
for applying or focusing magnetic fields
towards brain areas outside cerebral
cortex (e.g., cerebellum). A repetitive
transcranial magnetic stimulation
system that is intended to treat major
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
depressive disorder is classified in
§ 882.5805. A transcranial magnetic
stimulation system for headache is
classified in § 882.5808.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Performance testing must
demonstrate electromagnetic
compatibility, electrical safety, and
thermal safety.
(2) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(3) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Non-clinical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
tested:
(i) Magnetic pulse output testing;
(ii) Magnetic and electrical field
testing;
(iii) Testing of the safety features built
into the device; and
(iv) Testing of the sound levels
patients are exposed to during device
use.
(5) The physician and patient labeling
must include the following:
(i) The risks and benefits associated
with use of the device;
(ii) Detailed instructions to prevent
seizures, to monitor the patient for
seizure activity during treatment, and to
provide seizure management care if one
were to occur during treatment; and
(iii) A description of the ear
protection to be worn by the patient
during use of the device, including the
type of protection and its noise
reduction rating.
Dated: March 8, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–04709 Filed 3–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9228-9230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04709]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-0396]
Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation System for Neurological and
Psychiatric Disorders and Conditions
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying
the transcranial magnetic stimulation system for neurological and
psychiatric disorders and conditions into class II (special controls).
The
[[Page 9229]]
special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this
order and will be part of the codified language for the transcranial
magnetic stimulation system for neurological and psychiatric disorders
and conditions' classification. We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the device into class II (special
controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens.
DATES: This order is effective March 14, 2019. The classification was
applicable on August 16, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Doucet, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1535, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6474,
John.Doucet@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the transcranial magnetic
stimulation system for neurological and psychiatric disorders and
conditions as class II (special controls), which we have determined
will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In
addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to
beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens by
placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class
III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act to a predicate device that does not require
premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)). We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) of the FD&C Act and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) respectively.
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically within
class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the initial
classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request
or premarket approval application in order to market a substantially
equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial
equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the 510(k) process, when
necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On September 29, 2017, Brainsway Ltd. submitted a request for De
Novo classification of the Brainsway Deep Transcranial Magnetic
Stimulation System. FDA reviewed the request in order to classify the
device under the criteria for classification set forth in section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on August 16, 2018, FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 882.5802. We have named
the generic type of device transcranial magnetic stimulation system for
neurological and psychiatric disorders and conditions, and it is
identified as a prescription, non-implantable device that uses brief
duration, rapidly alternating, or pulsed, magnetic fields to induce
neural activity in the cerebral cortex. It is not intended for applying
or focusing magnetic fields towards brain areas outside cerebral cortex
(e.g., cerebellum). A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
system that is intended to treat major depressive disorder is
classified in Sec. 882.5805. A transcranial magnetic stimulation
system for headache is classified in Sec. 882.5808.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
[[Page 9230]]
Table 1--Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation System for Neurological and
Psychiatric Disorders and Conditions Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seizure................................ Non-clinical performance
testing, and Labeling.
Thermal injury......................... Non-clinical performance
testing; Thermal safety
testing; Electrical safety
testing; Software
verification, validation, and
hazard analysis; and Labeling.
Hearing loss........................... Non-clinical performance
testing, and Labeling.
Scalp discomfort, dizziness, nausea, Labeling.
pain in neck or jaw, headache, or
other adverse effects due to treatment.
Adverse tissue reaction................ Biocompatibility evaluation,
and Labeling.
Electrical shock....................... Electrical safety testing, and
Labeling.
Device failure due to interference with Electromagnetic compatibility
other devices. testing, Electrical safety
testing, and Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. In order for a device to fall
within this classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with the special controls named in
this final order. The necessary special controls appear in the
regulation codified by this order. This device is subject to premarket
notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, transcranial magnetic stimulation
systems for neurological and psychiatric disorders and conditions are
for prescription use only. Prescription devices are exempt from the
requirement for adequate directions for use for the layperson under
section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the
conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21 U.S.C.
352(f)(1)).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of
information in part 820, regarding quality system regulation, have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0073; the collections of
information in part 814, subparts A through E, regarding premarket
approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0231; the
collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been approved under OMB control number
0910-0120; and the collections of information in part 801, regarding
labeling, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
882 is amended as follows:
PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 882 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 882.5802 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 882.5802 Transcranial magnetic stimulation system for
neurological and psychiatric disorders and conditions.
(a) Identification. A transcranial magnetic stimulation system for
neurological and psychiatric disorders and conditions is a
prescription, non-implantable device that uses brief duration, rapidly
alternating, or pulsed, magnetic fields to induce neural activity in
the cerebral cortex. It is not intended for applying or focusing
magnetic fields towards brain areas outside cerebral cortex (e.g.,
cerebellum). A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation system that
is intended to treat major depressive disorder is classified in Sec.
882.5805. A transcranial magnetic stimulation system for headache is
classified in Sec. 882.5808.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Performance testing must demonstrate electromagnetic
compatibility, electrical safety, and thermal safety.
(2) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed.
(3) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The
following performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Magnetic pulse output testing;
(ii) Magnetic and electrical field testing;
(iii) Testing of the safety features built into the device; and
(iv) Testing of the sound levels patients are exposed to during
device use.
(5) The physician and patient labeling must include the following:
(i) The risks and benefits associated with use of the device;
(ii) Detailed instructions to prevent seizures, to monitor the
patient for seizure activity during treatment, and to provide seizure
management care if one were to occur during treatment; and
(iii) A description of the ear protection to be worn by the patient
during use of the device, including the type of protection and its
noise reduction rating.
Dated: March 8, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-04709 Filed 3-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P