Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising, 9051-9053 [2019-04466]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules
JACET, GA
WP
T–294
HABJE, MS
Meridian, MS (MEI)
NOSRY, MS
BOYDD, AL
ALICE, AL
CRMSN, AL
SITES, AL
OAKGO, AL
WUNET, AL
VLKNN, AL
TRUST, AL
JOTAV, AL
NOPVE, AL
DEGAA, AL
KOCEY, AL
LAYIN, AL
HEFIN, AL
BBAIT, GA
JMPPR, GA
GRANT, GA
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–04535 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 436
Disclosure Requirements and
Prohibitions Concerning Franchising
Federal Trade Commission.
Regulatory review; request for
public comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
is requesting public comment on its
Trade Regulation Rule entitled
‘‘Disclosure Requirements and
Prohibitions Concerning Franchising’’
(‘‘Franchise Rule’’ or ‘‘Rule’’). The Rule
makes it an unfair or deceptive act or
practice for franchisors to fail to give
prospective franchisees a Franchise
Disclosure Document providing
specified information about the
franchisor, the franchise business, and
the terms of the franchise agreement.
The Rule also prohibits related
misrepresentations by franchise sellers.
The Commission is soliciting comments
about the efficiency, costs, benefits, and
regulatory impact of the Rule as part of
its systematic review of all current
Commission regulations and guides. All
interested persons are hereby given
notice of the opportunity to submit
written data, views, and arguments
concerning the Rule.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Mar 12, 2019
(Lat. 33°29′41.42″ N, long. 082°06′27.81″ W)
HABJE, MS to GRANT, GA [Amended]
Fix
VORTAC
Fix
Fix
Fix
WP
Fix
Fix
Fix
WP
Fix
Fix
Fix
WP
Fix
Fix
Fix
WP
WP
Fix
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
32°23′32.11″
32°22′42.38″
32°29′06.87″
32°41′52.58″
32°59′03.95″
33°15′31.80″
33°24′28.11″
33°27′13.10″
33°31′40.47″
33°40′12.49″
33°38′21.99″
33°36′18.25″
33°35′27.30″
33°34′30.58″
33°35′20.40″
33°35′38.39″
33°35′54.75″
33°07′14.23″
32°57′42.02″
32°49′44.96″
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
089°05′56.57″
088°48′15.36″
088°39′10.26″
088°20′57.71″
087°56′12.06″
087°32′12.70″
087°18′27.10″
087°14′11.79″
087°07′17.21″
086°53′59.42″
086°36′58.83″
086°18′24.59″
086°10′51.81″
086°02′32.96″
085°41′02.32″
085°32′50.84″
085°25′10.57″
084°46′13.19″
084°33′18.56″
084°22′36.39″
Written comments must be
received on or before May 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Franchise Rule
Regulatory Review, 16 CFR part 436,
Matter No. R511003,’’ on your comment
and file your comment online through
https://www.regulations.gov. If you
prefer to file your comment on paper,
mail your comment to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC–
5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC 20580,
or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex B),
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine M. Todaro, Division of
Marketing Practices, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, Constitution Center, 400
7th Street SW, 8th Floor, Suite 8528,
Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326–3711,
ctodaro@ftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 6,
2019.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
Jkt 247001
I. Background
The Commission issued the original
Franchise Rule pursuant to its authority
under Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act to proscribe unfair or
deceptive acts or practices.1 The
primary purpose of the Rule is to
provide prospective purchasers of
1 Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission
Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(a), prohibits ‘‘unfair or deceptive
acts or practices in or affecting commerce.’’
PO 00000
9051
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
franchises the material information they
need in order to weigh the risks and
benefits of such an investment by
providing disclosure requirements in a
uniform format that facilitates
comparison shopping.2 The
Commission adopted the Rule on
December 21, 1978, and it became fully
effective on July 21, 1979.3
In 1995, the Commission announced
a regulatory review of the Franchise
Rule.4 That proceeding, which
concluded that the Rule was still
needed but could be improved, led to
amendments to the Rule issued in 2007
(the ‘‘Amended Rule’’), which took
effect on July 1, 2008.5 The Amended
Rule sought, among other changes, to
reduce inconsistencies between federal
and state pre-sale disclosure
requirements and established a set of
uniform disclosure requirements in a
Franchise Disclosure Document
(‘‘FDD’’). Commission staff has
continued to work closely with the
North American Securities
Administrators Association, as well as
individual state franchise regulators, to
promote uniformity regarding franchise
disclosure requirements.
The Amended Rule requires
franchisors to provide prospective
franchisees with their FDD at least 14
calendar days before they make any
payment or sign a binding agreement in
connection with a proposed franchise
sale.6 The FDD provides prospective
2 Original Franchise Rule Statement of Basis and
Purpose (‘‘Original SBP’’), 43 FR 59614 (Dec. 21,
1978).
3 Id.
4 60 FR 17656 (Apr. 7, 1995).
5 Amended Franchise Rule Statement of Basis and
Purpose (‘‘Amended Rule SBP’’), 72 FR 15444 (Mar.
30, 2007).
6 16 CFR 436.2(a).
E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM
13MRP1
9052
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
franchise purchasers with 23 items of
information material to their investment
decision, including the initial fees and
estimated initial investment required;
the litigation and bankruptcy history of
the franchisor, its officers, and key
executives; the financial performance of
existing company-owned and franchised
outlets; contact information for current
and former franchisees; and financial
statements reflecting the ability of the
franchisor to provide promised services
and support. The FDD also requires
disclosure of any restrictions on the
sources of goods and services and any
required purchases; a franchisee’s
contractual obligations in the
establishment and operation of the
franchise; the terms of any financing
offered by the franchisor; the training
and assistance provided by the
franchisor; the extent to which the
franchisee’s outlet is protected from
competition by the franchisor and other
franchisees; any restrictions on what the
franchisee may sell; the circumstances
in which the franchise may be
prematurely terminated or in which the
franchisee’s sale or renewal of the
franchise may be refused by the
franchisor; how and where any disputes
will be resolved; any restrictions on the
franchisee’s ability to engage in the
same or similar business during and
after the termination of the franchise;
and the number of outlets created, sold,
and closed during the past three years.
In addition, if the franchisor makes a
financial performance representation,
the representation must be disclosed in
the FDD.
II. Regulatory Review
The Commission reviews its rules and
guides periodically to seek information
about their costs and benefits and their
regulatory and economic impact. The
information obtained assists the
Commission in identifying rules and
guides that may warrant modification or
rescission.
As part of this review, the
Commission is seeking comment on a
number of issues, as outlined in the
questions posed in Section III below,
including the continuing need for the
Amended Rule, its economic impact,
the effect of the Rule on the unfair and
deceptive practices it was designed to
prevent, and the interaction of the Rule
with other regulations. The Commission
believes that this review is important to
determine whether the Rule continues
to serve a useful purpose and, if so, how
it could or should be improved.
III. Issues for Comment
The Commission requests written
comments on any or all of the following
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Mar 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
questions. Interested parties are invited
to comment on any relevant issue,
regardless of whether it is identified
below. Where comments advocate a
change to the Rule, please be specific in
stating the unfair or deceptive act or
practice to which the change relates,
provide evidence of the pervasiveness of
the act or practice, and describe the
suggested change and any potential
costs or benefits the change might have
on prospective franchisees, franchisors,
and franchise sellers, including those
that are small businesses. The
Commission requests that responses to
its questions be as specific as possible,
include a reference to the question being
answered, and cite to empirical data or
other evidence wherever available and
appropriate.
1. Is there a continuing need for the
Rule? Why or why not?
2. What benefits, if any, has the Rule
provided to prospective franchisees,
including small businesses? What
evidence supports the asserted benefits?
3. What modifications, if any, should
be made to the Rule to increase its
benefits to prospective franchisees,
including small businesses?
a. What evidence supports the
proposed modifications?
b. How would these modifications
affect the costs the Rule imposes on
franchisors and franchise sellers,
including small businesses?
c. How would these modifications
affect the benefits to prospective
franchisees?
4. What impact has the Rule had on
the flow of truthful information and on
the flow of deceptive information to
prospective franchisees?
5. What significant costs, if any, has
the Rule imposed on prospective
franchisees, including small businesses?
What evidence supports the asserted
costs?
6. What modifications, if any, should
be made to the Rule to reduce any costs
on prospective franchisees, including
small businesses?
a. What evidence supports the
proposed modifications?
b. How would these modifications
affect the benefits provided by the Rule?
7. What benefits, if any, has the Rule
provided to franchisors and franchise
sellers, including small businesses?
What evidence supports the asserted
benefits?
8. What modifications, if any, should
be made to the Rule to increase its
benefits to franchisors and franchise
sellers, including small businesses?
a. What evidence supports the
proposed modifications?
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
b. How would these modifications
affect the costs the Rule imposes on
franchisors and franchise sellers?
c. How would these modifications
affect the benefits to prospective
franchisees?
9. What significant costs, if any,
including costs of compliance, has the
Rule imposed on franchisors and
franchise sellers, including small
businesses? What evidence supports the
asserted costs?
10. What modifications, if any, should
be made to the Rule to reduce the costs
imposed on franchisors and franchise
sellers, including small businesses?
a. What evidence supports the
proposed modifications?
b. How would these modifications
affect the costs the Rule imposes on
franchisors and franchise sellers?
c. How would these modifications
affect the benefits to prospective
franchisees?
11. What evidence is available
concerning the degree of industry
compliance with the Rule?
12. What modifications, if any, should
be made to the Rule to account for
changes in relevant technology or
economic conditions? What evidence
supports the proposed modifications?
13. Provide comment on any overlap
or conflict with other federal, state, or
local laws, or regulations.
a. What evidence supports any
asserted conflicts?
b. With reference to asserted conflicts,
should the Rule be modified? If so, why
or why not?
IV. Instructions for Submitting
Comments
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before May 13, 2019. Write ‘‘Franchise
Rule Regulatory Review, 16 CFR part
436, Matter No. R511003,’’ on your
comment. Your comment, including
your name and your state, will be
placed on the public record of this
proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online through the https://
www.regulations.gov/ website.
If you file your comment on paper,
write [‘‘Franchise Rule Regulatory
Review, 16 CFR part 436, Matter No.
R511003’’] on your comment and on the
envelope and mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM
13MRP1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules
CC–5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW,
5th Floor, Suite 5610, Washington, DC
20024. If possible, please submit your
paper comment to the Commission by
courier or overnight service.
Because your comment will be placed
on the publicly accessible website at
https://www.regulations.gov/, you are
solely responsible for making sure that
your comment does not include any
sensitive or confidential information. In
particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal
information, such as your or anyone
else’s Social Security number; date of
birth; driver’s license number or other
state identification number, or foreign
country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or
debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your
comment does not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, your comment should not
include any ‘‘trade secret or any
commercial or financial information
which . . . is privileged or
confidential’’— as provided in Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)—
including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs,
sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names. As a
matter of discretion, the Commission
tries to remove individual’s home
contact information from comments
before placing them on
www.regulations.gov.
Comments containing material for
which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form,
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’
and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c).
In particular, the written request for
confidential treatment that accompanies
the comment must include the factual
and legal basis for the request and must
identify the specific portions of the
comments to be withheld from the
public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your
comment will be kept confidential only
if the FTC General Counsel grants your
request in accordance with the law and
the public interest. Once your comment
has been posted publicly at
www.regulations.gov—as legally
required by FTC Rule 4.9(b)—we cannot
redact or remove your comment, unless
you submit a confidentiality request that
meets the requirements for such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Mar 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and
the General Counsel grants that request.
Visit the FTC website to read this
Notice and the news release describing
it. The FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before May 13, 2019. For information on
the Commission’s privacy policy,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/
site-information/privacy-policy.
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–04466 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
9053
Federal Register on Friday, December 7,
2018 (83 FR 63200). The notice of
hearing appeared in the Federal
Register on Friday, March 1, 2018 (84
FR 6988). The subject of the public
hearing concerned proposed regulations
that provide guidance related to the
Foreign Tax Credit, including guidance
implementing changes made by the Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act. The public comment
period for these regulations ended on
Tuesday, February 5, 2019.
The notice of hearing instructed those
interested in testifying at the public
hearing to submit an outline of the
topics to be discussed. The outline of
topics to be discussed was due by
Friday, March 8, 2019. As of March 8,
2019, no one has requested to speak.
Therefore, the public hearing scheduled
for Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 10:00
a.m. is cancelled.
Martin V. Franks,
Branch Chief, Publications and Regulations
Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate
Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration).
[FR Doc. 2019–04707 Filed 3–11–19; 11:15 am]
26 CFR Part 1
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
[REG–105600–18]
RIN 1545–BO62
Guidance Related to the Foreign Tax
Credit, Including Guidance
Implementing Changes Made by the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; Cancellation of
Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public
hearing on proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document cancels a
public hearing on proposed regulations
concerning guidance related to the
Foreign Tax Credit, including guidance
implementing changes made by the Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act.
DATES: The public hearing, originally
scheduled for Thursday, March 14, 2019
at 10:00 a.m. is cancelled.
ADDRESSES: The cancelled public
hearing was originally scheduled to be
held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Jeffrey P. Cowan, Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (International) at (202)
317–4924 (not a toll-free number);
concerning information on the cancelled
hearing Regina Johnson at (202) 317–
6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of proposed rulemaking appeared in the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board
37 CFR Parts 303, 350, 355, 370, 380,
382, 383, 384, and 385
[Docket No. 18–CRB–0012 RM]
Copyright Royalty Board Regulations
Regarding Procedures for
Determination and Allocation of
Assessment To Fund Mechanical
Licensing Collective and Other
Amendments Required by the HatchGoodlatte Music Modernization Act
Copyright Royalty Board,
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Royalty Judges
(Judges) propose regulations governing
proceedings to determine the
reasonableness of and allocate
responsibility to fund the operating
budget of the Mechanical Licensing
Collective authorized by the Music
Modernization Act (MMA). The Judges
also propose amendments to extant
rules as required by the MMA. The
Judges solicit comments on the
proposed rules.
DATES: Comments are due no later than
April 12, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
and proposals, identified by docket
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM
13MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9051-9053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04466]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 436
Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Regulatory review; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') is
requesting public comment on its Trade Regulation Rule entitled
``Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising''
(``Franchise Rule'' or ``Rule''). The Rule makes it an unfair or
deceptive act or practice for franchisors to fail to give prospective
franchisees a Franchise Disclosure Document providing specified
information about the franchisor, the franchise business, and the terms
of the franchise agreement. The Rule also prohibits related
misrepresentations by franchise sellers. The Commission is soliciting
comments about the efficiency, costs, benefits, and regulatory impact
of the Rule as part of its systematic review of all current Commission
regulations and guides. All interested persons are hereby given notice
of the opportunity to submit written data, views, and arguments
concerning the Rule.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Franchise Rule
Regulatory Review, 16 CFR part 436, Matter No. R511003,'' on your
comment and file your comment online through https://www.regulations.gov. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail
your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office
of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex B),
Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center,
400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC
20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine M. Todaro, Division of
Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 8th Floor, Suite
8528, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326-3711, ctodaro@ftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commission issued the original Franchise Rule pursuant to its
authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to
proscribe unfair or deceptive acts or practices.\1\ The primary purpose
of the Rule is to provide prospective purchasers of franchises the
material information they need in order to weigh the risks and benefits
of such an investment by providing disclosure requirements in a uniform
format that facilitates comparison shopping.\2\ The Commission adopted
the Rule on December 21, 1978, and it became fully effective on July
21, 1979.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.
45(a), prohibits ``unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or
affecting commerce.''
\2\ Original Franchise Rule Statement of Basis and Purpose
(``Original SBP''), 43 FR 59614 (Dec. 21, 1978).
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1995, the Commission announced a regulatory review of the
Franchise Rule.\4\ That proceeding, which concluded that the Rule was
still needed but could be improved, led to amendments to the Rule
issued in 2007 (the ``Amended Rule''), which took effect on July 1,
2008.\5\ The Amended Rule sought, among other changes, to reduce
inconsistencies between federal and state pre-sale disclosure
requirements and established a set of uniform disclosure requirements
in a Franchise Disclosure Document (``FDD''). Commission staff has
continued to work closely with the North American Securities
Administrators Association, as well as individual state franchise
regulators, to promote uniformity regarding franchise disclosure
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 60 FR 17656 (Apr. 7, 1995).
\5\ Amended Franchise Rule Statement of Basis and Purpose
(``Amended Rule SBP''), 72 FR 15444 (Mar. 30, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Amended Rule requires franchisors to provide prospective
franchisees with their FDD at least 14 calendar days before they make
any payment or sign a binding agreement in connection with a proposed
franchise sale.\6\ The FDD provides prospective
[[Page 9052]]
franchise purchasers with 23 items of information material to their
investment decision, including the initial fees and estimated initial
investment required; the litigation and bankruptcy history of the
franchisor, its officers, and key executives; the financial performance
of existing company-owned and franchised outlets; contact information
for current and former franchisees; and financial statements reflecting
the ability of the franchisor to provide promised services and support.
The FDD also requires disclosure of any restrictions on the sources of
goods and services and any required purchases; a franchisee's
contractual obligations in the establishment and operation of the
franchise; the terms of any financing offered by the franchisor; the
training and assistance provided by the franchisor; the extent to which
the franchisee's outlet is protected from competition by the franchisor
and other franchisees; any restrictions on what the franchisee may
sell; the circumstances in which the franchise may be prematurely
terminated or in which the franchisee's sale or renewal of the
franchise may be refused by the franchisor; how and where any disputes
will be resolved; any restrictions on the franchisee's ability to
engage in the same or similar business during and after the termination
of the franchise; and the number of outlets created, sold, and closed
during the past three years. In addition, if the franchisor makes a
financial performance representation, the representation must be
disclosed in the FDD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 16 CFR 436.2(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Regulatory Review
The Commission reviews its rules and guides periodically to seek
information about their costs and benefits and their regulatory and
economic impact. The information obtained assists the Commission in
identifying rules and guides that may warrant modification or
rescission.
As part of this review, the Commission is seeking comment on a
number of issues, as outlined in the questions posed in Section III
below, including the continuing need for the Amended Rule, its economic
impact, the effect of the Rule on the unfair and deceptive practices it
was designed to prevent, and the interaction of the Rule with other
regulations. The Commission believes that this review is important to
determine whether the Rule continues to serve a useful purpose and, if
so, how it could or should be improved.
III. Issues for Comment
The Commission requests written comments on any or all of the
following questions. Interested parties are invited to comment on any
relevant issue, regardless of whether it is identified below. Where
comments advocate a change to the Rule, please be specific in stating
the unfair or deceptive act or practice to which the change relates,
provide evidence of the pervasiveness of the act or practice, and
describe the suggested change and any potential costs or benefits the
change might have on prospective franchisees, franchisors, and
franchise sellers, including those that are small businesses. The
Commission requests that responses to its questions be as specific as
possible, include a reference to the question being answered, and cite
to empirical data or other evidence wherever available and appropriate.
1. Is there a continuing need for the Rule? Why or why not?
2. What benefits, if any, has the Rule provided to prospective
franchisees, including small businesses? What evidence supports the
asserted benefits?
3. What modifications, if any, should be made to the Rule to
increase its benefits to prospective franchisees, including small
businesses?
a. What evidence supports the proposed modifications?
b. How would these modifications affect the costs the Rule imposes
on franchisors and franchise sellers, including small businesses?
c. How would these modifications affect the benefits to prospective
franchisees?
4. What impact has the Rule had on the flow of truthful information
and on the flow of deceptive information to prospective franchisees?
5. What significant costs, if any, has the Rule imposed on
prospective franchisees, including small businesses? What evidence
supports the asserted costs?
6. What modifications, if any, should be made to the Rule to reduce
any costs on prospective franchisees, including small businesses?
a. What evidence supports the proposed modifications?
b. How would these modifications affect the benefits provided by
the Rule?
7. What benefits, if any, has the Rule provided to franchisors and
franchise sellers, including small businesses? What evidence supports
the asserted benefits?
8. What modifications, if any, should be made to the Rule to
increase its benefits to franchisors and franchise sellers, including
small businesses?
a. What evidence supports the proposed modifications?
b. How would these modifications affect the costs the Rule imposes
on franchisors and franchise sellers?
c. How would these modifications affect the benefits to prospective
franchisees?
9. What significant costs, if any, including costs of compliance,
has the Rule imposed on franchisors and franchise sellers, including
small businesses? What evidence supports the asserted costs?
10. What modifications, if any, should be made to the Rule to
reduce the costs imposed on franchisors and franchise sellers,
including small businesses?
a. What evidence supports the proposed modifications?
b. How would these modifications affect the costs the Rule imposes
on franchisors and franchise sellers?
c. How would these modifications affect the benefits to prospective
franchisees?
11. What evidence is available concerning the degree of industry
compliance with the Rule?
12. What modifications, if any, should be made to the Rule to
account for changes in relevant technology or economic conditions? What
evidence supports the proposed modifications?
13. Provide comment on any overlap or conflict with other federal,
state, or local laws, or regulations.
a. What evidence supports any asserted conflicts?
b. With reference to asserted conflicts, should the Rule be
modified? If so, why or why not?
IV. Instructions for Submitting Comments
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before May 13, 2019.
Write ``Franchise Rule Regulatory Review, 16 CFR part 436, Matter No.
R511003,'' on your comment. Your comment, including your name and your
state, will be placed on the public record of this proceeding,
including, to the extent practicable, on the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online through the https://www.regulations.gov/ website.
If you file your comment on paper, write [``Franchise Rule
Regulatory Review, 16 CFR part 436, Matter No. R511003''] on your
comment and on the envelope and mail your comment to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
[[Page 9053]]
CC-5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610,
Washington, DC 20024. If possible, please submit your paper comment to
the Commission by courier or overnight service.
Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible
website at https://www.regulations.gov/, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive or
confidential information. In particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal information, such as your or anyone
else's Social Security number; date of birth; driver's license number
or other state identification number, or foreign country equivalent;
passport number; financial account number; or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible for making sure that your
comment does not include any sensitive health information, such as
medical records or other individually identifiable health information.
In addition, your comment should not include any ``trade secret or any
commercial or financial information which . . . is privileged or
confidential''-- as provided in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including in
particular competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales
statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names. As a matter of discretion, the Commission
tries to remove individual's home contact information from comments
before placing them on www.regulations.gov.
Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). In particular,
the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the
comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request and
must identify the specific portions of the comments to be withheld from
the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel grants your request in
accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your comment has
been posted publicly at www.regulations.gov--as legally required by FTC
Rule 4.9(b)--we cannot redact or remove your comment, unless you submit
a confidentiality request that meets the requirements for such
treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General Counsel grants that
request.
Visit the FTC website to read this Notice and the news release
describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission
administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and
use in this proceeding as appropriate. The Commission will consider all
timely and responsive public comments that it receives on or before May
13, 2019. For information on the Commission's privacy policy, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-04466 Filed 3-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P