Special Local Regulation; Gulfport Grand Prix, Boca Ciego Bay, Gulfport, FL, 8607-8610 [2019-04332]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Installation of Stow/Transit Switches
Before the accumulation of 2,000 total
flight hours, or within 400 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, install new stow/transit
switches having part number (P/N) 83–990–
168, on the #1 and #2 engine thrust reversers,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Embraer Service Bulletin 145–
78–0035, Revision 03, dated November 26,
2004.
(h) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, a stow/
transit switch having P/N 83–990–137 or P/
N 83–990–152.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using the applicable
document specified in paragraphs (i)(1),
(i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD.
(1) Embraer Service Bulletin 145–78–0035,
dated October 4, 2002. This document is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(2) Embraer Service Bulletin 145–78–0035,
Revision 01, dated December 11, 2002. This
document is not incorporated by reference in
this AD.
(3) Embraer Service Bulletin 145–78–0035,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2003. This
document is incorporated by reference in AD
2004–13–16, Amendment 39–13698 (69 FR
38819, June 29, 2004).
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
Ageˆncia Nacional de Aviac
¸a˜o Civil (ANAC);
or ANAC’s authorized Designee. If approved
by the ANAC Designee, the approval must
include the Designee’s authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
8607
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Brazilian
AD 2001–05–03R3, dated April 22, 2003, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0118.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3218.
(3) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(5) and (l)(6) of this AD.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on April 15, 2019.
(i) Embraer Service Bulletin 145–78–0035,
Revision 03, dated November 26, 2004.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) The following service information was
approved for IBR on August 3, 2004 (69 FR
38819, June 29, 2004).
(i) Embraer Service Bulletin 145–78–0035,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2003. Pages 1
and 2 of this document are identified as
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2003; pages 3
through 13 are identified as the original
version, dated October 4, 2002.
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
Faria Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sa˜o
Jose dos Campos—SP—Brasil; telephone +55
12 3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732; fax +55
12 3927–7546; email distrib@embraer.com.br;
internet https://www.flyembraer.com.
(6) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(7) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
February 28, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–04312 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0059]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Gulfport
Grand Prix, Boca Ciego Bay, Gulfport,
FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a special local regulation on
the waters of the Boca Ciego Bay in the
vicinity of Gulfport, Florida, during the
Gulfport Grand Prix High Speed Boat
Race. Approximately 75 boats, 14–30
feet in length, traveling at speeds in
excess of 120 miles per hour are
expected to participate. Additionally, it
is anticipated that 100 spectator vessels
will be present along the race course.
The special local regulation is necessary
to protect the safety of race participants,
participant vessels, spectators, and the
general public on navigable waters of
the Gulf of Mexico during the event.
The special local regulation will
establish the following regulated areas:
A race area where all non-participant
persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port St. Petersburg (COTP) or a
designated representative; and a buffer
zone where designated representatives
may control vessel traffic as deemed
necessary by the COTP St. Petersburg or
a designated representative based upon
prevailing weather conditions.
DATES: This rule is effective daily from
8 a.m. until 5 p.m. on March 29, 2019
through March 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0059 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
8608
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Marine Science Technician First
Class Michael D. Shackleford, Sector St.
Petersburg Prevention Department,
Coast Guard; telephone (813) 228–2191,
email Michael.D.Shackleford@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
The Coast Guard is establishing this
special local regulation without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing an
NPRM with respect to this rule because
it is impracticable. Insufficient time
remains to publish an NPRM and to
receive public comments, as the event
will occur before the rulemaking
process would be completed. Because of
the potential safety hazards associated
with the race, the regulation is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
race participants, spectators, and vessels
transiting the event area. Additionally,
the Coast Guard is currently drafting a
NPRM covering this annual recurring
event; however, the NPRM will not be
finalized before the start date of the
event. For those reasons, it would be
impracticable to publish an NRPM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the reasons discussed
above, the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The legal basis for this rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
special local regulations in 33 U.S.C.
1233. The purpose of the rule is to
provide for the safety of event
participants, spectators, and the general
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
public on the navigable waters of the
Gulf of Mexico during the Gulfport
Grand Prix High Speed Boat Race event.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local
regulation that will encompass certain
waters of the Boca Ciega Bay in the
vicinity of Gulfport, Florida. The special
local regulation will be enforced daily
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on March 29, 2019
through March 31, 2019. The special
local regulation will establish two
regulated areas: (1) A race area where all
persons and vessels, except those
persons and vessels participating in the
high speed boat races, are prohibited
from entering, transiting through,
anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area without obtaining
permission from the COTP St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative; and (2) a buffer zone
where vessel traffic may be controlled as
determined by the COTP St. Petersburg
or a designated representative based
upon prevailing weather conditions.
Persons and vessels may request
authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area by contacting the Captain
of the Port (COTP) St. Petersburg by
telephone at (727) 824–7506, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted by
the COTP St. Petersburg or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
COTP St. Petersburg or a designated
representative. The Coast Guard will
provide notice of the regulated areas by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, or by on-scene
designated representatives.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on: (1) The special local
regulation will be enforced for only nine
hours on three days; (2) although
persons and vessels may not enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area without
authorization from the COTP St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative, they may operate in the
surrounding area during the
enforcement period; (3) persons and
vessels may still enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area or anchor in the spectator
area, during the enforcement period if
authorized by the COTP St. Petersburg
or a designated representative; and (4)
the Coast Guard will provide advance
notification of the special local
regulation to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners
and/or Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
17:17 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
made a determination that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine
parade enforced for nine hours daily
over a period of three days that will
prohibit non-participant persons and
vessels from entering, transiting
through, remaining within, or anchoring
in the regulated area. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L61 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05–1.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
F. Environment
2. Add § 100.T07–0059 to read as
follows:
■
§ 100.T07–0059 Special Local Regulation;
Gulfport Grand Prix, Boca de Ciego;
Gulfport, FL.
(a) Location. The following regulated
areas are established as a special local
regulation. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(1) Race area. All waters of Boca de
Ciego contained within the following
points: 27°44′10″ N, 082°42′29″ W,
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8609
thence to position 27°44′07″ N,
082°42′40″ W, thence to position
27°44′06″ N, 082°42′40″ W, thence to
position 27°44′04″ N, 082°42′29″ W,
thence to position 27°44′07″ N,
082°42′19″ W, thence to position
27°44′08″ N, 082°42′19″ W, thence back
to the original position, 27°44′10″ N,
082°42′29″ W.
(2) Buffer zone. All waters of Boca de
Ciego encompassed within the
following points: 27°44′10″ N,
082°42′47″ W, thence to position
27°44′01″ N, 082°42′44″ W, thence to
position 27°44′01″ N, 082°42′14″ W,
thence to position 27°44′15″ N,
082°42′14″ W.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative″ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
COTP St. Petersburg in the enforcement
of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All nonparticipant persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the race area unless an
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) St. Petersburg or a designated
representative.
(2) Vessel traffic within the buffer
zone may be controlled by the COTP St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative as deemed necessary by
the COTP St. Petersburg or a designated
representative based upon prevailing
weather conditions.
(3) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the race area contact the
COTP St. Petersburg by telephone at
(727) 824–7506 or via VHF–FM radio
Channel 16 to request authorization.
(4) If authorization to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
race area is granted, all persons and
vessels receiving such authorization
shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or a designated
representative.
(5) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated areas by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, or by on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced daily from 8 a.m. until 5
p.m. on March 29, 2019 through March
31, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
8610
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: March 4, 2019.
H.L. Najarian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg.
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0671,
Blathras.constantine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
[FR Doc. 2019–04332 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
I. Background
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
I. Background
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1092; FRL–9990–43Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Michigan
Minor New Source Review
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving the
rescission of Michigan rule 221 from the
Michigan state implementation plan
(SIP). Rule 221 exempted sources that
had significant net emission increases of
sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and
carbon monoxide from offset
requirements. Michigan rescinded this
rule effective November 14, 1990.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1092. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either through
www.regulations.gov or at the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone
Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 886–0671 before
visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air
Act requires that the SIP include a
program to provide for the ‘‘regulation
of the modification and construction of
any stationary source within the areas
covered by the plan as necessary to
assure that national ambient air quality
standards are achieved.’’ This includes
a program for permitting construction
and modification of both major and
minor sources that the State deems
necessary to protect air quality. The
State of Michigan’s minor source permit
to install rules are contained in Part 2
(Air Use Approval) of the Michigan
Administrative Code. Changes to the
Part 2 rules were submitted on
November 12, 1993; May 16, 1996; April
3, 1998; September 2, 2003; March 24,
2009; and February 28, 2017. EPA
approved changes to the Part 2 rules
most recently in a final approval dated
August 31, 2018 (83 FR 44485).
Rule 336.1221 (Construction of
sources of particulate matter, sulfur
dioxide, or carbon monoxide in or near
nonattainment areas; conditions for
approval).
EPA published a proposed
disapproval of the 1993, 1996, and 1996
submittals on November 9, 1999 (64 FR
61046), but never published a final
disapproval. As part of that proposed
disapproval, EPA conducted an
evaluation of the State submittal and
found that as one of the items, the State
failed to rescind Michigan rule
336.1221. In that action, EPA stated,
‘‘Michigan rule 336.1221 impermissibly
exempts sources that have significant
net emissions increases of sulfur
dioxide, particulate matter, and carbon
monoxide from offset requirements.
Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality rescinded Michigan rule
336.1221 effective November 14, 1990.
However, the State never submitted the
rule to EPA for rescission. Because
Michigan did not submit the rescission
to the USEPA for removal of the rule
from the SIP, the Michigan NSR rules
are not approvable at this time.’’
On September 24, 2003, the State of
Michigan submitted a SIP revision to
EPA requesting full approval of
Michigan’s Clean Air Act New Source
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Review SIP. As part of that submittal
requesting revisions to Parts 1 (General
Provisions) and 2, Michigan specifically
requested to rescind rule 336.1221. As
part of its technical support document,
Michigan stated that rule 336.1221 was
rescinded from the State rules in 1990,
and requests that EPA remove it from
the SIP.
At the time of the 1999 proposed
disapproval, the Part 2 rules also
included the state’s major
nonattainment PTI permitting program.
The major nonattainment provisions
have been removed from Part 2, and are
now covered by the Part 19 (New Source
Review for Major Sources Impacting
Nonattainment Areas) rules. The Part 19
rules were fully approved by EPA into
the Michigan SIP on December 16, 2013,
(78 FR 76064). The Federal
nonattainment air quality permitting
regulations are found in 40 CFR
51.165(a) and (b). The Federal rules
found at 40 CFR 51.165(a) and (b)
specify the elements necessary for
approval of a State permit program for
preconstruction review for
nonattainment purposes under Part D of
the Clean Air Act. A major source or
major modification that would be
located in an area designated as
nonattainment and subject to the
nonattainment area permitting rules
must meet stringent conditions designed
to ensure that the new source’s
emissions will be controlled to the
greatest degree possible; that more than
equivalent offsetting emission
reductions will be obtained from
existing sources; and that there will be
progress toward achieving the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards. EPA
has found that the rules as submitted by
Michigan for inclusion into its SIP are
at least as stringent as the Federal rules.
By rescinding rule 221 from the
Michigan SIP, the Michigan SIP is
meeting the Federal statutory
requirements for an approvable Part 2
and Part 19 air permitting program.
On December 13, 2018 (83 FR 64055),
EPA published a Federal Register action
proposing approval of the rescission of
rule 221 from the Michigan SIP. EPA
received no comments during the public
comment period which ended on
January 14, 2019.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the rescission of
Michigan rule 336.1221 from the
Michigan SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 47 (Monday, March 11, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8607-8610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04332]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0059]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Gulfport Grand Prix, Boca Ciego Bay,
Gulfport, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation on
the waters of the Boca Ciego Bay in the vicinity of Gulfport, Florida,
during the Gulfport Grand Prix High Speed Boat Race. Approximately 75
boats, 14-30 feet in length, traveling at speeds in excess of 120 miles
per hour are expected to participate. Additionally, it is anticipated
that 100 spectator vessels will be present along the race course. The
special local regulation is necessary to protect the safety of race
participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public
on navigable waters of the Gulf of Mexico during the event. The special
local regulation will establish the following regulated areas: A race
area where all non-participant persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg (COTP) or a designated representative; and a buffer zone
where designated representatives may control vessel traffic as deemed
necessary by the COTP St. Petersburg or a designated representative
based upon prevailing weather conditions.
DATES: This rule is effective daily from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. on March
29, 2019 through March 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0059 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket
[[Page 8608]]
Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Michael D.
Shackleford, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
telephone (813) 228-2191, email Michael.D.Shackleford@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is establishing this special local regulation
without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority
under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause
finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM with
respect to this rule because it is impracticable. Insufficient time
remains to publish an NPRM and to receive public comments, as the event
will occur before the rulemaking process would be completed. Because of
the potential safety hazards associated with the race, the regulation
is necessary to provide for the safety of the race participants,
spectators, and vessels transiting the event area. Additionally, the
Coast Guard is currently drafting a NPRM covering this annual recurring
event; however, the NPRM will not be finalized before the start date of
the event. For those reasons, it would be impracticable to publish an
NRPM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the reasons discussed above,
the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The legal basis for this rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish special local regulations in 33 U.S.C. 1233. The purpose of
the rule is to provide for the safety of event participants,
spectators, and the general public on the navigable waters of the Gulf
of Mexico during the Gulfport Grand Prix High Speed Boat Race event.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local regulation that will
encompass certain waters of the Boca Ciega Bay in the vicinity of
Gulfport, Florida. The special local regulation will be enforced daily
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on March 29, 2019 through March 31, 2019. The
special local regulation will establish two regulated areas: (1) A race
area where all persons and vessels, except those persons and vessels
participating in the high speed boat races, are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area without obtaining permission from the COTP St.
Petersburg or a designated representative; and (2) a buffer zone where
vessel traffic may be controlled as determined by the COTP St.
Petersburg or a designated representative based upon prevailing weather
conditions.
Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area by contacting
the Captain of the Port (COTP) St. Petersburg by telephone at (727)
824-7506, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the COTP St. Petersburg or a
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the COTP St.
Petersburg or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated areas by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, or by on-scene designated representatives.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on: (1) The special
local regulation will be enforced for only nine hours on three days;
(2) although persons and vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area without authorization from the
COTP St. Petersburg or a designated representative, they may operate in
the surrounding area during the enforcement period; (3) persons and
vessels may still enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area or anchor in the spectator area, during the
enforcement period if authorized by the COTP St. Petersburg or a
designated representative; and (4) the Coast Guard will provide advance
notification of the special local regulation to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners and/or Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to
[[Page 8609]]
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a special local regulation issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine parade enforced for nine hours daily over a period of
three days that will prohibit non-participant persons and vessels from
entering, transiting through, remaining within, or anchoring in the
regulated area. This rule is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.T07-0059 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.T07-0059 Special Local Regulation; Gulfport Grand Prix, Boca
de Ciego; Gulfport, FL.
(a) Location. The following regulated areas are established as a
special local regulation. All coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
(1) Race area. All waters of Boca de Ciego contained within the
following points: 27[deg]44'10'' N, 082[deg]42'29'' W, thence to
position 27[deg]44'07'' N, 082[deg]42'40'' W, thence to position
27[deg]44'06'' N, 082[deg]42'40'' W, thence to position 27[deg]44'04''
N, 082[deg]42'29'' W, thence to position 27[deg]44'07'' N,
082[deg]42'19'' W, thence to position 27[deg]44'08'' N, 082[deg]42'19''
W, thence back to the original position, 27[deg]44'10'' N,
082[deg]42'29'' W.
(2) Buffer zone. All waters of Boca de Ciego encompassed within the
following points: 27[deg]44'10'' N, 082[deg]42'47'' W, thence to
position 27[deg]44'01'' N, 082[deg]42'44'' W, thence to position
27[deg]44'01'' N, 082[deg]42'14'' W, thence to position 27[deg]44'15''
N, 082[deg]42'14'' W.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the COTP
St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All non-participant persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the race area unless an authorized by the Captain of
the Port (COTP) St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
(2) Vessel traffic within the buffer zone may be controlled by the
COTP St. Petersburg or a designated representative as deemed necessary
by the COTP St. Petersburg or a designated representative based upon
prevailing weather conditions.
(3) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the race area contact the COTP St. Petersburg by
telephone at (727) 824-7506 or via VHF-FM radio Channel 16 to request
authorization.
(4) If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the race area is granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization shall comply with the instructions of the
COTP or a designated representative.
(5) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated areas by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced daily from 8
a.m. until 5 p.m. on March 29, 2019 through March 31, 2019.
[[Page 8610]]
Dated: March 4, 2019.
H.L. Najarian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2019-04332 Filed 3-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P