Special Local Regulations; Annual Boyne Thunder Poker Run; Charlevoix, MI, 8641-8642 [2019-04281]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
issues and questions in this RFI. In
particular, OSHA invites comment on
specific issues and requests information
and data about practices at affected
establishments in general industry,
construction, shipyard employment,
and marine cargo handling. When
submitting comments in response to
questions or issues raised or revisions
that OSHA is considering, OSHA
requests that you explain your rationale
and, if possible, provide data and
information to support your comments
and recommendations.
Authority and Signature
Loren Sweatt, Acting Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, authorized the
preparation of this notice pursuant to 29
U.S.C. 653,655, and 657, Secretary’s
Order 1–2012 (77 FR 3912; Jan. 25,
2012), and 29 CFR part 1911.
Signed at Washington, DC, on March 5,
2019.
Loren Sweatt,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2019–04338 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2018–1098]
RIN 100–AA08
Special Local Regulations; Annual
Boyne Thunder Poker Run; Charlevoix,
MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
add a special local regulation to increase
safety in the navigable waters of Round
Lake and Pine River Channel,
Charlevoix, MI during the annual Boyne
Thunder Poker Run. The proposal will
allow the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander to control vessel traffic
during the event in this small and
restricted waterway. The proposed
regulation will be enforced during the
day of the event. The date and time will
be announced via a Notice of
Enforcement. We invite your comments
on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 10, 2019.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–1098 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Type the docket
number (USCG–2018–1098) in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST2 Blackledge, Waterways
Management, Coast Guard Sector Sault
Sainte Marie, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 906–253–2443, email
Onnalee.A.Blackledge@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Annual Boyne Thunder Poker
Run is a charity marine event occurring
in the month of July with a route that
runs from Boyne City out to Lake
Michigan and back to Boyne City. This
event, occurring annually for the past 15
years, includes approximately 100
participants in offshore type power
vessels. Round Lake and Pine River
Channel are small restricted waterways
that normally have a variety of
recreational users and a commercial
ferry that provides service to Beaver
Island. This mix of vessels in close
proximity to the event warrants
additional safety measures.
The legal basis for this proposed
rulemaking is found at 33 U.S.C. 1233;
33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie (COTP) has determined that
adding the Annual Boyne City Poker
Run to the list of Special Local
Regulations in the navigable waters of
Round Lake and Pine River Channel in
Charlevoix, MI is the most practical way
to ensure the safety of the boating
public.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8641
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day for the Special Local
Regulation. Vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit through the regulated area
which will impact a small designated
area within the COTP zone for a short
duration of time. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the special local area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the regulated
area may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A. above,
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
8642
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this rule has implications
for federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
prohibits vessels from entering,
transiting through, or anchoring within
the regulated area without the
permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L61 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this rule.
G. Protest Activities
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05–
1.
■
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
PO 00000
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
Sfmt 9990
2. Add § 100.929 to read as follows:
§ 100.929 Special Local Regulations;
Annual Boyne Thunder Poker Run;
Charlevoix, MI.
(a) Regulated area. These Special
Local Regulations apply to all U.S.
navigable waters of Round Lake and
Pine River Channel, Charlevoix, MI,
within an area bordered by a line at the
entrance of the Pine River Channel
charted in position 45°19′15″ N,
085°15′55″ W to 45°19′13″ N, 085°15′55″
W to the southeast end of Round Lake
charted in position 45°18′57″ N,
085°14′49″ W to 45°18′56″ N, 085°14′50″
W.
(b) Special Local Regulation. The
regulations of § 100.901 apply. No
vessel may enter, transit through, or
anchor within the regulated area
without the permission of the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander.
(c) Enforcement Period. The Coast
Guard will issue a Notice of
Enforcement with the exact time and
date in July that this regulated area will
be enforced.
Dated: March 5, 2019.
P.S. Nelson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2019–04281 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 47 (Monday, March 11, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8641-8642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04281]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2018-1098]
RIN 100-AA08
Special Local Regulations; Annual Boyne Thunder Poker Run;
Charlevoix, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notification of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to add a special local regulation to
increase safety in the navigable waters of Round Lake and Pine River
Channel, Charlevoix, MI during the annual Boyne Thunder Poker Run. The
proposal will allow the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to control vessel
traffic during the event in this small and restricted waterway. The
proposed regulation will be enforced during the day of the event. The
date and time will be announced via a Notice of Enforcement. We invite
your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-1098 using the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number (USCG-2018-1098) in the
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' See the ``Public Participation and
Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for further instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST2 Blackledge, Waterways Management, Coast Guard Sector
Sault Sainte Marie, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 906-253-2443, email
Onnalee.A.Blackledge@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Annual Boyne Thunder Poker Run is a charity marine event
occurring in the month of July with a route that runs from Boyne City
out to Lake Michigan and back to Boyne City. This event, occurring
annually for the past 15 years, includes approximately 100 participants
in offshore type power vessels. Round Lake and Pine River Channel are
small restricted waterways that normally have a variety of recreational
users and a commercial ferry that provides service to Beaver Island.
This mix of vessels in close proximity to the event warrants additional
safety measures.
The legal basis for this proposed rulemaking is found at 33 U.S.C.
1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) has determined
that adding the Annual Boyne City Poker Run to the list of Special
Local Regulations in the navigable waters of Round Lake and Pine River
Channel in Charlevoix, MI is the most practical way to ensure the
safety of the boating public.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day for the Special Local Regulation.
Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit through the regulated
area which will impact a small designated area within the COTP zone for
a short duration of time. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
special local area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
[[Page 8642]]
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule prohibits vessels
from entering, transiting through, or anchoring within the regulated
area without the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal e-
Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document
for alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.929 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.929 Special Local Regulations; Annual Boyne Thunder Poker
Run; Charlevoix, MI.
(a) Regulated area. These Special Local Regulations apply to all
U.S. navigable waters of Round Lake and Pine River Channel, Charlevoix,
MI, within an area bordered by a line at the entrance of the Pine River
Channel charted in position 45[deg]19'15'' N, 085[deg]15'55'' W to
45[deg]19'13'' N, 085[deg]15'55'' W to the southeast end of Round Lake
charted in position 45[deg]18'57'' N, 085[deg]14'49'' W to
45[deg]18'56'' N, 085[deg]14'50'' W.
(b) Special Local Regulation. The regulations of Sec. 100.901
apply. No vessel may enter, transit through, or anchor within the
regulated area without the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
(c) Enforcement Period. The Coast Guard will issue a Notice of
Enforcement with the exact time and date in July that this regulated
area will be enforced.
Dated: March 5, 2019.
P.S. Nelson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2019-04281 Filed 3-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P