Closure of FCC Lockbox 979094 Used To File Fees for Complaint Proceedings Handled by the Enforcement Bureau, 8617-8619 [2019-04257]
Download as PDF
8617
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerances in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
(2) * * *
Parts per
million
Commodity
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 26, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
*
*
*
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B .....................
*
*
*
*
Cottonseed subgroup 20C ...
*
*
0.10
*
*
*
Kohlrabi .................................
Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B .........................
*
*
0.60
*
*
*
Stalk and stem vegetable
subgroup 22A, except
kohlrabi ..............................
Stevia, dried leaves ..............
*
*
*
*
Swiss chard ..........................
*
*
0.15
*
*
*
Vegetable, Brassica, head
and stem, group 5–16 .......
*
*
*
*
*
Vegetable, leaves of root and
tuber, group 2, except
sugar beet .........................
*
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.368(a)(2):
a. Remove the entries for
‘‘Asparagus’’; ‘‘Beet, garden, leaves’’;
‘‘Brassica, head and stem, subgroup
5A’’; and ‘‘Brassica, leafy greens,
subgroup 5B’’ from the table.
■ b. Add alphabetically the entry for
‘‘Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–
16B’’ to the table.
■ c. Remove the entry for ‘‘Cotton,
undelinted seed’’ from the table.
■ d. Add alphabetically the entries for
‘‘Cottonseed subgroup 20C’’ and
‘‘Kohlrabi’’ to the table.
■ e. Remove the entry for ‘‘Leaf petioles,
subgroup 4B’’ from the table.
■ f. Add alphabetically the entries for
‘‘Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B’’;
‘‘Stalk and stem vegetable subgroup
22A, except kohlrabi’’; ‘‘Stevia, dried
leaves’’; and ‘‘Swiss chard’’ to the table.
■ g. Remove the entry for ‘‘Turnip
greens’’ from the table.
■ h. Add alphabetically the entries for
‘‘Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem,
group 5–16’’ and ‘‘Vegetable, leaves of
root and tuber, group 2, except sugar
beet’’ to the table.
The additions read as follows:
■
■
§ 180.368 Metolachlor; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.8
0.10
*
0.10
15
0.60
*
2.0
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–04251 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[MD Docket No. 19–40; FCC 19–13]
Closure of FCC Lockbox 979094 Used
To File Fees for Complaint
Proceedings Handled by the
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) adopts an Order that
closes Lockbox 979094 and modifies the
relevant rule provisions of filing and
making fee payments in lieu of closing
the lockbox.
DATES: Effective April 10, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Warren Firschein, Office of Managing
Director at (202) 418–2653 or Roland
Helvajian, Office of Managing Director
at (202) 418–0444.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
8618
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
II. Introduction
4. In the Order, we reduce
expenditures by the Commission and
modernize procedures by amending
§ 1.1106 of our rules, 47 CFR 1.1106,
which sets forth the application fee for
certain complaints delegated to the
FCC’s Enforcement Bureau (EB) and
currently handled by its Market
Disputes Resolution Division. The rule
amendment reflects the closure of the
mailing drop box (P.O. Box) 1 used for
such manual payment of filing fees for
two types of EB complaints, section 208
formal complaints and section 224 pole
attachment complaints. We discontinue
the option of manual fee payments and
instead require the use of an electronic
payment for each complaint type.
Consistent with this change, we also
make conforming revisions to § 1.734 of
the Commission’s rules to account for
the electronic fee payment requirements
of formal complaint proceedings, as
described more fully below.
5. Section 1.1106 of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 1.1106, provides a
schedule of application fees for
complaint proceedings handled by the
EB. The rule had also directed filers that
do not utilize the Commission’s on-line
filing and fee payment systems to send
manual payments to P.O. Box 979094 at
U.S. Bank in St. Louis, Missouri. In
recent years, there have been a
decreasing number of lockbox filers, and
it now is rare that the Commission
receives a lockbox payment.
6. The Commission has begun to
reduce its reliance on P.O. Boxes for the
collection of fees, instead encouraging
the use of electronic payment systems
for all application and regulatory fees
and closing certain lockboxes. We find
that electronic payment of fees for
complaints processed by EB will reduce
the agency’s expenditures (including
eliminating the annual fee for the bank’s
services) and the cost of manually
processing each transaction, with little
or no inconvenience to the
Commission’s regulatees, applicants,
and the public.
7. As part of this effort, we are now
closing P.O. Box 979094 and modifying
the relevant rule provisions that require
payment of fees via the closed P.O. Box.
Our action here to close this lockbox
and require electronic payments for any
EB-related complaints has implications
for existing Commission regulations
other than section 1.1106. Thus, we also
revise § 1.734 of the Commission’s rules
to account for the electronic fee
payment requirements adopted in this
Order. We note that in 2014, the
Commission adopted rules requiring
that, with the exception of confidential
material, complaints should be
submitted electronically via the
agency’s Electronic Comment Filing
System (ECFS) after filers have paid the
appropriate fee, and therefore this
change does not impact the filing of the
complaints themselves. The rule
changes are contained in the Appendix
1 A P.O. Box used for the collection of fees is
referred to as a ‘‘lockbox’’ in our rules and other
Commission documents. The FCC collects
application processing fees using a series of P.O.
Boxes located at U.S. Bank in St. Louis, Missouri.
See 47 CFR 1.1101–1.1109 (setting forth the fee
schedule for each type of application remittable to
the Commission along with the correct lockbox).
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Order,
FCC 19–13, MD Docket No. 19–49,
adopted on February 20, 2019 and
released on February 25, 2019. The full
text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC
Reference Center (Room CY–A257), 445
12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554,
or by downloading the text from the
Commission’s website at https://
www.fcc.gov/document/closureenforcement-bureau-lockbox-979094.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Administrative Matters
A. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. Section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as amended, requires a
regulatory flexibility analysis in notice
and comment rulemaking proceedings.
See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). As we are adopting
these rules without notice and
comment, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required.
B. Final Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
2. This document does not contain
new or modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it
does not contain any new or modified
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
C. Congressional Review Act
3. The Commission will not send a
copy of the Order pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A), because the adopted rules
are rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice that do not
‘‘substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. See 5
U.S.C. 804(3)(C).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the Order. We make these changes
without notice and comment because
they are rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice exempt from the
general notice-and-comment
requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act, see 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
8. Implementation. As a temporary
transition measure, for 90 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register, U.S. Bank will
continue to process payments to P.O.
Box 979094. After that date, payments
for any EB-related complaint proceeding
must be made in accordance with the
procedures set forth on the
Commission’s website, https://
www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees
(Enforcement Bureau Fee Filing Guide).
For now, such payments will be made
through the Fee Filer Online System
(Fee Filer), accessible at https://
www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees/
fee-filer. As we assess and implement
U.S. Treasury initiatives toward an allelectronic payment system, we may
transition to other secure payment
systems with appropriate public notice
and guidance.
III. Ordering Clauses
9. Accordingly, it is ordered, that
pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 158, 208,
and 224 of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i),
154(j), 158, 208, and 224, the Order is
hereby adopted and the rules set forth
in the Appendix of the Order are hereby
amended effective April 10, 2019.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and
procedure, Communications common
carriers.
Federal Communications Commission.
Cecilia Sigmund,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
Final Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR part 1 as
follows:
PART 1—PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for part 1 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
155, 157, 225, 227, 303(r), 309, 1403, 1404,
1451, and 1452.
2. Amend § 1.734 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 1.734 Fee remittance; electronic filing;
copies; service; separate filings against
multiple defendants.
*
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
*
*
11MRR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(b) The complainant shall remit
separately the correct fee electronically,
in accordance with part 1, subpart G
(see § 1.1106 of this chapter) and shall
file an original copy of the complaint
using the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System. If a complaint
is addressed against multiple
defendants, the complainant shall pay a
separate fee for each additional
defendant.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 1.1106 to read as follows:
§ 1.1106 Schedule of charges for
applications for enforcement services.
Remit payment for these services
electronically using the Commission’s
electronic payment system in
accordance with the procedures set
forth on the Commission’s website,
www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees.
[FR Doc. 2019–04257 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket No. 10–90; FCC 19–8]
Connect America Fund
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) takes a small but
important step towards closing the
digital divide and making broadband
available for all Americans, by phasing
down legacy support for voice services
to make greater funding available for
voice and broadband services.
Specifically, the Commission adopts a
transition framework to phase down
Connect America Fund (CAF) Phase I
frozen support in areas where support is
now awarded pursuant to the CAF
Phase II auction.
DATES: Effective April 10, 2019, except
for the addition of § 54.313(m), which
contains information collection
requirements that have not been
approved by OMB. The FCC will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the effective date
of the § 54.313 amendment awaiting
OMB approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Minard, Wireline
Competition Bureau, (202) 418–7400 or
TTY: (202) 418–0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
and Order in WC Docket No. 10–90;
FCC 19–8, adopted on February 14,
2019 and released on February 15, 2019.
The full text of this document is
available for public inspection during
regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Center, Room CY–A257, 445
12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554
or at the following internet address:
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/
attachments/FCC-19-8A1.pdf.
I. Introduction
1. In this Report and Order, the
Commission takes a small but important
step towards closing the digital divide
and making broadband available for all
Americans, by phasing down legacy
support for voice services to make
greater funding available for voice and
broadband services. Specifically, the
Commission adopts a transition
framework to phase down Connect
America Fund (CAF) Phase I frozen
support in areas where support is now
awarded pursuant to the CAF Phase II
auction. Winning bidders were awarded
$1.488 billion in support over 10 years
to deploy broadband in 45 states to
713,176 locations. Approximately 73%
of the locations available in the CAF
Phase II auction were covered by
winning bids, significantly narrowing
the areas where price cap carriers will
maintain voice-only obligations under
the legacy regime. The transition plan
the Commission adopts in this
document provides certainty and
stability in those areas by establishing a
reasonable support glide path as the
Commission transitions from one
support mechanism to another.
II. Discussion
2. As the Commission has noted, ‘‘the
CAF is not created on a blank slate, but
rather against the backdrop of a
decades-old regulatory system.’’ Thus, a
smooth transition must account for the
several support mechanisms currently
in effect as well as the auction outcomes
in different areas. To comprehensively
resolve these phase-down issues prior to
authorizing CAF Phase II auction
support, the Commission addresses the
transition of both price cap carriers’ and
competitive eligible
telecommunications carriers (ETCs)
offering service to fixed locations (fixed
competitive ETCs’) legacy support
together.
3. Pursuant to the April 2014 Connect
America Further Notice, 79 FR 39196,
July 9, 2014, the Commission adopts a
methodology for disaggregating support
by employing the Connect America Cost
Model (CAM) to account for the relative
costs of providing service among areas
in states where price cap carriers
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8619
declined model-based CAF Phase II
support. These price cap carriers
currently receive an amount of frozen
support for each carrier’s designated
service area within a particular state.
Within that state, the Commission uses
the CAM to allocate a portion of each
carrier’s existing frozen support to each
auction-eligible census block based on
the relative costs of providing service
across all auction-eligible census blocks
within the same state. Consistent with
the cap for reserve prices exceeding the
extremely high-cost threshold in the
CAF Phase II auction, the Commission
limits the allocated monthly support for
any census block to $146.10 per
location.
4. The Commission concludes that the
interim methodology it adopts is a
reasonable approach for allocating
support among a price cap carrier’s
census blocks because it targets support
based on the relative costs of providing
service based on the CAM. Phase I
frozen support was based largely on
inherently inefficient legacy support
mechanisms that did not reflect the
costs of serving high-cost and extremely
high-cost areas; the Commission’s
interim methodology now ties
disaggregated support amounts to the
costs of serving each affected census
block for the transitional period. The
Commission also concludes that the
methodology it adopts is preferable to
the proposal in the April 2014 Connect
America Further Notice because it better
calibrates the available support with the
cost to serve the defined areas. The
Commission’s 2014 proposal would
have distributed the legacy support that
carriers received in each state based on
the average cost to serve all high-cost
and extremely high-cost areas in that
state. As a result, it would have
allocated the same amount of support
regardless of the relative mix of highcost and extremely high-cost areas that
carriers are required to serve after the
auction until a replacement ETC is in
place.
5. The Commission adopts the
schedule in the following for the
transition of price cap carriers’ and
fixed competitive ETCs’ legacy support.
This transition schedule will fund new
service obligations undertaken by Phase
II auction winners, protect customers of
current support recipients from a
potential loss of service, and minimize
the disruption to recipients of frozen
legacy support from a loss of funding. It
balances the need for responsible
stewardship of finite universal service
funds against the need to distribute
funding for voice and broadband
services consistent with the results of
the Commission’s CAF Phase II auction
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 47 (Monday, March 11, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8617-8619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04257]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[MD Docket No. 19-40; FCC 19-13]
Closure of FCC Lockbox 979094 Used To File Fees for Complaint
Proceedings Handled by the Enforcement Bureau
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC
or Commission) adopts an Order that closes Lockbox 979094 and modifies
the relevant rule provisions of filing and making fee payments in lieu
of closing the lockbox.
DATES: Effective April 10, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warren Firschein, Office of Managing
Director at (202) 418-2653 or Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing
Director at (202) 418-0444.
[[Page 8618]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order,
FCC 19-13, MD Docket No. 19-49, adopted on February 20, 2019 and
released on February 25, 2019. The full text of this document is
available for public inspection and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554, or by downloading the text from the Commission's
website at https://www.fcc.gov/document/closure-enforcement-bureau-lockbox-979094.
I. Administrative Matters
A. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis in notice and comment
rulemaking proceedings. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). As we are adopting these
rules without notice and comment, no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
B. Final Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
2. This document does not contain new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain
any new or modified information collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
C. Congressional Review Act
3. The Commission will not send a copy of the Order pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because the
adopted rules are rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice
that do not ``substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-
agency parties. See 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C).
II. Introduction
4. In the Order, we reduce expenditures by the Commission and
modernize procedures by amending Sec. 1.1106 of our rules, 47 CFR
1.1106, which sets forth the application fee for certain complaints
delegated to the FCC's Enforcement Bureau (EB) and currently handled by
its Market Disputes Resolution Division. The rule amendment reflects
the closure of the mailing drop box (P.O. Box) \1\ used for such manual
payment of filing fees for two types of EB complaints, section 208
formal complaints and section 224 pole attachment complaints. We
discontinue the option of manual fee payments and instead require the
use of an electronic payment for each complaint type. Consistent with
this change, we also make conforming revisions to Sec. 1.734 of the
Commission's rules to account for the electronic fee payment
requirements of formal complaint proceedings, as described more fully
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A P.O. Box used for the collection of fees is referred to as
a ``lockbox'' in our rules and other Commission documents. The FCC
collects application processing fees using a series of P.O. Boxes
located at U.S. Bank in St. Louis, Missouri. See 47 CFR 1.1101-
1.1109 (setting forth the fee schedule for each type of application
remittable to the Commission along with the correct lockbox).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Section 1.1106 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1106,
provides a schedule of application fees for complaint proceedings
handled by the EB. The rule had also directed filers that do not
utilize the Commission's on-line filing and fee payment systems to send
manual payments to P.O. Box 979094 at U.S. Bank in St. Louis, Missouri.
In recent years, there have been a decreasing number of lockbox filers,
and it now is rare that the Commission receives a lockbox payment.
6. The Commission has begun to reduce its reliance on P.O. Boxes
for the collection of fees, instead encouraging the use of electronic
payment systems for all application and regulatory fees and closing
certain lockboxes. We find that electronic payment of fees for
complaints processed by EB will reduce the agency's expenditures
(including eliminating the annual fee for the bank's services) and the
cost of manually processing each transaction, with little or no
inconvenience to the Commission's regulatees, applicants, and the
public.
7. As part of this effort, we are now closing P.O. Box 979094 and
modifying the relevant rule provisions that require payment of fees via
the closed P.O. Box. Our action here to close this lockbox and require
electronic payments for any EB-related complaints has implications for
existing Commission regulations other than section 1.1106. Thus, we
also revise Sec. 1.734 of the Commission's rules to account for the
electronic fee payment requirements adopted in this Order. We note that
in 2014, the Commission adopted rules requiring that, with the
exception of confidential material, complaints should be submitted
electronically via the agency's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS)
after filers have paid the appropriate fee, and therefore this change
does not impact the filing of the complaints themselves. The rule
changes are contained in the Appendix of the Order. We make these
changes without notice and comment because they are rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice exempt from the general notice-
and-comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, see 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
8. Implementation. As a temporary transition measure, for 90 days
after publication of this document in the Federal Register, U.S. Bank
will continue to process payments to P.O. Box 979094. After that date,
payments for any EB-related complaint proceeding must be made in
accordance with the procedures set forth on the Commission's website,
https://www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees (Enforcement Bureau Fee
Filing Guide). For now, such payments will be made through the Fee
Filer Online System (Fee Filer), accessible at https://www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees/fee-filer. As we assess and implement U.S.
Treasury initiatives toward an all-electronic payment system, we may
transition to other secure payment systems with appropriate public
notice and guidance.
III. Ordering Clauses
9. Accordingly, it is ordered, that pursuant to sections 4(i),
4(j), 158, 208, and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 158, 208, and 224, the Order is hereby
adopted and the rules set forth in the Appendix of the Order are hereby
amended effective April 10, 2019.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and procedure, Communications common
carriers.
Federal Communications Commission.
Cecilia Sigmund,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
Final Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 1 as follows:
PART 1--PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
0
1. The authority citation for part 1 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 157, 225, 227,
303(r), 309, 1403, 1404, 1451, and 1452.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1.734 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.734 Fee remittance; electronic filing; copies; service;
separate filings against multiple defendants.
* * * * *
[[Page 8619]]
(b) The complainant shall remit separately the correct fee
electronically, in accordance with part 1, subpart G (see Sec. 1.1106
of this chapter) and shall file an original copy of the complaint using
the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System. If a complaint is
addressed against multiple defendants, the complainant shall pay a
separate fee for each additional defendant.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 1.1106 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.1106 Schedule of charges for applications for enforcement
services.
Remit payment for these services electronically using the
Commission's electronic payment system in accordance with the
procedures set forth on the Commission's website, www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees.
[FR Doc. 2019-04257 Filed 3-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P