Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC, 8420-8422 [2019-04219]

Download as PDF 8420 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. on portions of Oregon Inlet near active demolition work and demolition equipment. Entry of vessels or persons into this safety zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) North Carolina or designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 8, 2019, through March 30, 2020. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from March 4, 2019, through March 8, 2019. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018– 1065 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, contact Petty Officer Matthew Tyson, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Wilmington, NC; telephone: (910) 772– 2221, email: Matthew.I.Tyson@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: § 117.795 I. Table of Abbreviations A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a Memorandum for the Record are not required for this rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117 as follows: PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows: ■ [Amended] 2. In § 117.795, remove paragraph (b) and re-designate paragraph (c) as paragraph (b). ■ Dated: Feburary 14, 2019. A.J. Tiongson, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2019–04260 Filed 3–7–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG–2018–1065] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of Oregon Inlet in Dare County, North Carolina in support of demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. This temporary safety zone is intended to protect mariners, vessels, and demolition crews from the hazards associated with demolishing the old bridge, and will restrict vessel traffic SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 07, 2019 Jkt 247001 CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NCDOT North Carolina Department of Transportation NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History On November 26, 2018, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) provided the Coast Guard with details concerning the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. Demolition will not follow a set schedule due to sea conditions, equipment needs, and vessel navigation considerations. In addition, demolition will take place in two locations at once due to equipment types and demolition methods. NCDOT has determined that a moving safety zone is needed in Oregon Inlet within 100 yards of active demolition work and demolition equipment. In response, on December 18, 2018, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC (83 FR 64771). There, we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. During the comment period that ended January 17, 2019, we received no PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 comments. However, during the comment period, NCDOT requested a new effective period from the beginning of March through March 30, 2020, instead of between February 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020, as proposed in the NPRM. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest because immediate action is needed protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment on the navigable waters of Oregon Inlet during the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge in Dare County, NC. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The COTP North Carolina has determined that potential safety hazards associated with the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge would be a concern for anyone transiting Oregon Inlet. The purpose of this rule is to protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment in Oregon Inlet during the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published December 18, 2018. There is a minor change in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule, shifting the demolition period start and end dates back by one month. The demolition will occur from the beginning of March through March 30, 2020, instead of between February 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020. This rule establishes a moving safety zone to be enforced during active demolition work from March 4, 2019, through March 30, 2020. Demolition will not follow a set schedule due to changing sea conditions, equipment needs, and vessel navigation considerations. In addition, demolition will take place in two locations at once due to equipment types and demolition methods, the exact times of activation will be announced via Broadcast Notices to Mariners at least 48 hours prior to enforcement. The moving safety zone will include all navigable waters within 100 yards of active demolition work and demolition equipment in Oregon Inlet along the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge, which follows a line beginning at approximate position 35°46′47″ N, 75°32′41″ W, then E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM 08MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations southeast to 35°46′37″ N, 75°32′33″ W then southeast to 35°46′09″ N, 75°31′59″ W, then southeast to 35°46′03″ N, 75°31′51″ W, then southeast to 35°460′1″ N, 75°31′40″ W. (NAD 1983). This zone is intended to protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment on the navigable waters in Oregon Inlet during the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone during the designated times. There will be alternative navigation options for vessel traffic when a moving safety zone that covers all or part of the navigation channel is being enforced. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will not be allowed to enter or transit portions of Oregon Inlet during active demolition work, to be conducted from March 4, 2019, through March 30, 2020. The specific enforcement times for active demolition work will be broadcast at least 48 hours in advance and vessels will be able to transit Oregon Inlet at all other times. The Coast Guard will issue a Local Notice to Mariners and transmit a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel 16 regarding the safety zone. There will be alternative navigation options for vessel traffic when a moving safety zone covers all or part of the navigation channel. Vessel traffic in this portion of Oregon Inlet will fluctuate between high, medium, and low depending on the time of the year. This rule does not allow vessels to request VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 07, 2019 Jkt 247001 permission to enter the moving safety zone covering the active demolition areas within Oregon Inlet during the designated times. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 8421 D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a 100yard radius moving safety zone lasting from March 4, 2019, through March 30, 2020, that will prohibit entry into a portion of Oregon Inlet for bridge demolition. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM 08MRR1 8422 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. § 165.23 apply to the area described in paragraph (a) of this section. (2) With the exception of demolition crews, entry into or remaining in this safety zone is prohibited. (3) All vessels within this safety zone when this section becomes effective must depart the zone immediately. (4) The Captain of the Port, North Carolina can be reached through the Coast Guard Sector North Carolina Command Duty Officer, Wilmington, North Carolina at telephone number 910–343–3882. (5) The Coast Guard and designated security vessels enforcing the safety zone can be contacted on VHF–FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz). (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies. (e) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from March 4, 2019, through March 30, 2020. (f) Public notification. The Coast Guard will notify the public of the active enforcement times at least 48 hours in advance by transmitting Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF– FM marine channel 16. 2. Add § 165.T05–1065 to read as follows: Dated: March 4, 2019. Bion B. Stewart, Captain, U. S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port North Carolina. § 165.T05–1065 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC. [FR Doc. 2019–04219 Filed 3–7–19; 8:45 am] ■ (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable waters of Oregon Inlet, within 100 yards of active demolition work and demolition equipment, along the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge, which follows a line beginning at approximate position 35°46′47″ N, 75°32′41″ W, then southeast to 35°46′37″ N, 75°32′33″ W, then southeast to 35°46′09″ N, 75°31′59″ W, then southeast to 35°46′03″ N, 75°31′51″ W, then southeast to 35°46′01″ N, 75°31′40″ W (NAD 1983) in Dare County, NC. (b) Definitions. As used in this section— Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer designated by the Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) for the enforcement of the safety zone. Captain of the Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina. Demolition crews means persons and vessels involved in support of demolition. (c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety zones in VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 07, 2019 Jkt 247001 BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–0595; FRL–9990–33– OAR] RIN 2060–AU08 Emissions Monitoring Provisions in State Implementation Plans Required Under the NOX SIP Call Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is revising some of the regulations that were originally promulgated in 1998 to implement the NOX SIP Call. The revisions give covered states greater flexibility concerning the form of the nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions monitoring requirements that the states must include in their state implementation plans (SIPs) for certain emissions sources. Other revisions remove SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 obsolete provisions and clarify the remaining regulations but do not substantively alter any current regulatory requirements. This rule is effective as of March 8, 2019. DATES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–0595. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through https:// www.regulations.gov. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lifland, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, MC 6204M, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; 202–343–9151; lifland.david@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Overview of the Action A. Summary of Amendments and Estimated Impacts B. Potentially Affected Entities C. Statutory Authority II. Summary of the Proposal A. Background B. Proposed Amendment to Emissions Monitoring Requirements C. Other Proposed Amendments D. Public Comment Process III. Response to Comments A. Emissions Monitoring Requirements B. Emissions Reduction Requirements C. Baseline Emissions Inventory Table D. Post-NBTP Transition Requirements IV. Final Action V. Impacts of the Amendments VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs C. Paperwork Reduction Act D. Regulatory Flexibility Act E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM 08MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 46 (Friday, March 8, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8420-8422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-1065]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
navigable waters of Oregon Inlet in Dare County, North Carolina in 
support of demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. This 
temporary safety zone is intended to protect mariners, vessels, and 
demolition crews from the hazards associated with demolishing the old 
bridge, and will restrict vessel traffic on portions of Oregon Inlet 
near active demolition work and demolition equipment. Entry of vessels 
or persons into this safety zone is prohibited unless specifically 
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) North Carolina or 
designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 8, 2019, 
through March 30, 2020. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice 
will be used from March 4, 2019, through March 8, 2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-1065 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
contact Petty Officer Matthew Tyson, Waterways Management Division, 
U.S. Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Wilmington, NC; telephone: 
(910) 772-2221, email: Matthew.I.Tyson@uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NCDOT North Carolina Department of Transportation
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On November 26, 2018, the North Carolina Department of 
Transportation (NCDOT) provided the Coast Guard with details concerning 
the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. Demolition will not 
follow a set schedule due to sea conditions, equipment needs, and 
vessel navigation considerations. In addition, demolition will take 
place in two locations at once due to equipment types and demolition 
methods. NCDOT has determined that a moving safety zone is needed in 
Oregon Inlet within 100 yards of active demolition work and demolition 
equipment. In response, on December 18, 2018, the Coast Guard published 
a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Oregon 
Inlet, Dare County, NC (83 FR 64771). There, we stated why we issued 
the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action 
related to the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. During 
the comment period that ended January 17, 2019, we received no 
comments. However, during the comment period, NCDOT requested a new 
effective period from the beginning of March through March 30, 2020, 
instead of between February 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020, as proposed 
in the NPRM.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of 
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest 
because immediate action is needed protect persons, vessels, and the 
marine environment on the navigable waters of Oregon Inlet during the 
demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge in Dare County, NC.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The COTP North Carolina has determined that potential safety 
hazards associated with the demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner 
Bridge would be a concern for anyone transiting Oregon Inlet. The 
purpose of this rule is to protect persons, vessels, and the marine 
environment in Oregon Inlet during the demolition of the old Herbert C. 
Bonner Bridge.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published 
December 18, 2018. There is a minor change in the regulatory text of 
this rule from the proposed rule, shifting the demolition period start 
and end dates back by one month. The demolition will occur from the 
beginning of March through March 30, 2020, instead of between February 
1, 2019, and February 29, 2020.
    This rule establishes a moving safety zone to be enforced during 
active demolition work from March 4, 2019, through March 30, 2020. 
Demolition will not follow a set schedule due to changing sea 
conditions, equipment needs, and vessel navigation considerations. In 
addition, demolition will take place in two locations at once due to 
equipment types and demolition methods, the exact times of activation 
will be announced via Broadcast Notices to Mariners at least 48 hours 
prior to enforcement. The moving safety zone will include all navigable 
waters within 100 yards of active demolition work and demolition 
equipment in Oregon Inlet along the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge, which 
follows a line beginning at approximate position 35[deg]46'47'' N, 
75[deg]32'41'' W, then

[[Page 8421]]

southeast to 35[deg]46'37'' N, 75[deg]32'33'' W then southeast to 
35[deg]46'09'' N, 75[deg]31'59'' W, then southeast to 35[deg]46'03'' N, 
75[deg]31'51'' W, then southeast to 35[deg]460'1'' N, 75[deg]31'40'' W. 
(NAD 1983). This zone is intended to protect persons, vessels, and the 
marine environment on the navigable waters in Oregon Inlet during the 
demolition of the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. No vessel or person 
will be permitted to enter the safety zone during the designated times. 
There will be alternative navigation options for vessel traffic when a 
moving safety zone that covers all or part of the navigation channel is 
being enforced.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will not be 
allowed to enter or transit portions of Oregon Inlet during active 
demolition work, to be conducted from March 4, 2019, through March 30, 
2020. The specific enforcement times for active demolition work will be 
broadcast at least 48 hours in advance and vessels will be able to 
transit Oregon Inlet at all other times. The Coast Guard will issue a 
Local Notice to Mariners and transmit a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 regarding the safety zone. There will be 
alternative navigation options for vessel traffic when a moving safety 
zone covers all or part of the navigation channel. Vessel traffic in 
this portion of Oregon Inlet will fluctuate between high, medium, and 
low depending on the time of the year. This rule does not allow vessels 
to request permission to enter the moving safety zone covering the 
active demolition areas within Oregon Inlet during the designated 
times.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the 
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves 
a 100-yard radius moving safety zone lasting from March 4, 2019, 
through March 30, 2020, that will prohibit entry into a portion of 
Oregon Inlet for bridge demolition. It is categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental

[[Page 8422]]

Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-1065 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T05-1065  Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable 
waters of Oregon Inlet, within 100 yards of active demolition work and 
demolition equipment, along the old Herbert C. Bonner Bridge, which 
follows a line beginning at approximate position 35[deg]46'47'' N, 
75[deg]32'41'' W, then southeast to 35[deg]46'37'' N, 75[deg]32'33'' W, 
then southeast to 35[deg]46'09'' N, 75[deg]31'59'' W, then southeast to 
35[deg]46'03'' N, 75[deg]31'51'' W, then southeast to 35[deg]46'01'' N, 
75[deg]31'40'' W (NAD 1983) in Dare County, NC.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section--
    Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, 
including a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 
designated by the Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) for the 
enforcement of the safety zone.
    Captain of the Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina.
    Demolition crews means persons and vessels involved in support of 
demolition.
    (c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety zones 
in Sec.  165.23 apply to the area described in paragraph (a) of this 
section.
    (2) With the exception of demolition crews, entry into or remaining 
in this safety zone is prohibited.
    (3) All vessels within this safety zone when this section becomes 
effective must depart the zone immediately.
    (4) The Captain of the Port, North Carolina can be reached through 
the Coast Guard Sector North Carolina Command Duty Officer, Wilmington, 
North Carolina at telephone number 910-343-3882.
    (5) The Coast Guard and designated security vessels enforcing the 
safety zone can be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 
(165.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
    (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol 
and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local 
agencies.
    (e) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from March 
4, 2019, through March 30, 2020.
    (f) Public notification. The Coast Guard will notify the public of 
the active enforcement times at least 48 hours in advance by 
transmitting Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16.

    Dated: March 4, 2019.
Bion B. Stewart,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2019-04219 Filed 3-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.