Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal Monitoring Surveys Along the Oregon and California Coasts, 8316-8319 [2019-04077]
Download as PDF
8316
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2019 / Notices
and electronic comments should be sent
to ITP.Pauline@noaa.gov.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Instructions: NMFS is not responsible
Administration
for comments sent by any other method,
to any other address or individual, or
RIN 0648–XG817
received after the end of the comment
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to period. Comments received
electronically, including all
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal attachments, must not exceed a 25megabyte file size. Attachments to
Monitoring Surveys Along the Oregon
electronic comments will be accepted in
and California Coasts
Microsoft Word or Excel or Adobe PDF
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
file formats only. All comments
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
received are a part of the public record
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
and will generally be posted online at
Commerce.
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/node/
ACTION: Notice; incidental harassment
23111 without change. All personal
authorization; request for comments on
identifying information (e.g., name,
proposed Renewal.
address) voluntarily submitted by the
commenter may be publicly accessible.
SUMMARY: NMFS received a request from Do not submit confidential business
the Partnership for Interdisciplinary
information or otherwise sensitive or
Study of Coastal Oceans (PISCO) at the
protected information.
University of California Santa Cruz
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob
(UCSC) for the Renewal of their
Pauline, Office of Protected Resources,
currently active incidental harassment
NMFS, (301) 427–8401. Electronic
authorization (IHA) to take marine
copies of the original application,
mammals incidental to rocky intertidal
Renewal request, and supporting
monitoring surveys along the coasts of
documents (including NMFS Federal
Oregon and California. These activities
Register notices of the original proposed
are nearly identical to those covered in
and final authorizations, and the
the current authorization. Pursuant to
previous IHA), as well as a list of the
the Marine Mammal Protection Act,
references cited in this document, may
prior to issuing the currently active IHA,
be obtained online at: https://
NMFS requested comments on both the
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
proposed IHA and the potential for
incidental-take-authorizations-underrenewing the initial authorization if
marine-mammal-protection-act. In case
certain requirements were satisfied. The
of problems accessing these documents,
Renewal requirements have been
please call the contact listed above.
satisfied and NMFS is now providing an
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
additional 15-day comment period to
allow for any additional comments on
Background
the proposed Renewal not previously
The Marine Mammal Protection Act
provided during the initial 30-day
(MMPA) prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of marine
comment period. Any comments
mammals, with certain exceptions.
received on the potential Renewal,
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
along with relevant comments on the
initial IHA, have been considered in the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated
development of this proposed IHA
to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the
Renewal, and a summary of agency
incidental, but not intentional, taking of
responses to applicable comments is
small numbers of marine mammals by
included in this notice. NMFS will
U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
consider any additional public
activity (other than commercial fishing)
comments prior to making any final
within a specified geographical region if
decision on the issuance of the
certain findings are made and either
requested Renewal, and agency
regulations are issued or, if the taking is
responses will be summarized in the
limited to harassment, a notice of a
final notice of our decision.
proposed incidental take authorization
DATES: Comments and information must
is provided to the public for review.
be received no later than March 22,
Authorization for incidental takings
2019.
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Comments should be
addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service. Physical
comments should be sent to 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Mar 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s) and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
taking for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe
the permissible methods of taking and
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
other ‘‘means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact’’ on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses
(referred to here as ‘‘mitigation
measures’’). Monitoring and reporting of
such takings are also required. The
meaning of key terms such as ‘‘take,’’
‘‘harassment,’’ and ‘‘negligible impact’’
can be found in section 3 of the MMPA
(16 U.S.C. 1362) and the agency’s
regulations at 50 CFR 216.103.
50 CFR 216.107(e) of NMFS’
regulations implementing the MMPA
indicate that IHAs may be renewed for
additional periods of time not to exceed
one year for each reauthorization. In the
notice of proposed IHA for the initial
authorization, NMFS described the
circumstances under which we would
consider issuing a Renewal for this
activity, and requested public comment
on a potential Renewal under those
circumstances. Specifically, on a caseby-case basis, NMFS may issue a oneyear IHA Renewal when (1) another year
of identical or nearly identical activities
as described in the Specified Activities
section is planned or (2) the activities
would not be completed by the time the
IHA expires and a second IHA would
allow for completion of the activities
beyond that described in the Dates and
Duration section, provided all of the
following conditions are met:
• A request for Renewal is received
no later than 60 days prior to expiration
of the current IHA.
• The request for Renewal must
include the following:
(1) An explanation that the activities
to be conducted beyond the initial dates
either are identical to the previously
analyzed activities or include changes
so minor (e.g., reduction in pile size)
that the changes do not affect the
previous analyses, take estimates, or
mitigation and monitoring
requirements.
(2) A preliminary monitoring report
showing the results of the required
monitoring to date and an explanation
showing that the monitoring results do
not indicate impacts of a scale or nature
not previously analyzed or authorized.
• Upon review of the request for
Renewal, the status of the affected
species or stocks, and any other
pertinent information, NMFS
determines that there are no more than
minor changes in the activities, the
mitigation and monitoring measures
remain the same and appropriate, and
the initial findings remain valid.
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2019 / Notices
An additional public comment period
of 15 days (for a total of 45 days), with
direct notice by email, phone, or postal
service to commenters on the initial
IHA, is provided to allow for any
additional comments on the proposed
Renewal. A description of the Renewal
process may be found on our website at:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/iharenewals.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
NOAA Administrative Order (NAO)
216–6A, NMFS must review our
proposed action (i.e., the issuance of an
IHA) with respect to potential impacts
on the human environment.
This action is consistent with
categories of activities identified in
Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no
anticipated serious injury or mortality)
of the Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A, which do
not individually or cumulatively have
the potential for significant impacts on
the quality of the human environment
and for which we have not identified
any extraordinary circumstances that
would preclude this categorical
exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the
issuance of the Renewal IHA qualifies to
be categorically excluded from further
NEPA review.
We will review all comments
submitted in response to this notice
prior to concluding our NEPA process
or making a final decision on the IHA
request.
History of Request
On March 8, 2018, NMFS issued an
IHA to PISCO to take marine mammals
incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring
surveys at multiple locations on the
coasts of Oregon and California (83 FR
11696; March 16, 2018), effective from
March 12, 2018 through March 11, 2019.
This multiyear annual survey involves
surveying rocky intertidal zones in a
number of coastal locations in Oregon
and California. NMFS has previously
issued five IHAs for this ongoing survey
project (77 FR 72327, December 5, 2012;
78 FR 79403, December 30, 2013; 79 FR
73048, December 9, 2014; 81 FR 7319,
February 2, 2016; 82 FR 12568, March
6, 2017). On January 8, 2019, NMFS
received an application for a Renewal of
that 2018 IHA (referred to as the initial
IHA henceforth). As described in the
application for Renewal, the activities
for which incidental take is requested
are nearly identical to those covered in
the initial IHA. As required, the
applicant also provided a preliminary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Mar 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
monitoring report (available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/incidentaltake-authorizations-research-and-otheractivities) which confirms that the
applicant has implemented the required
mitigation and monitoring, and which
also shows that no impacts of a scale or
nature not previously analyzed or
authorized have occurred as a result of
the activities conducted.
Description of the Specified Activities
and Anticipated Impacts
PISCO proposes to continue rocky
intertidal monitoring work that has been
ongoing for 20 years. PISCO focuses on
understanding the nearshore ecosystems
of the U.S. west coast through a number
of interdisciplinary collaborations. The
program integrates long-term monitoring
of ecological and oceanographic
processes at 154 separate sites with
experimental work in the lab and field.
Research is conducted throughout the
year along the California and Oregon
coasts and will continue as long as
funding is available. The research being
conducted under the Renewal would be
nearly identical to that analyzed under
the initial IHA (one new site added, but
no take of marine mammals
anticipated), and the anticipated
impacts are identical. Researchers
accessing and conducting research
activities on the sites may occasionally
cause behavioral disturbance (or Level B
harassment) of three pinniped species at
16 of the sites (described in PISCOs
application for the 2018 IHA). PISCO’s
request is for take of California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus), harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina richardii), and northern
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris).
PISCO expects that the disturbance to
pinnipeds from the research activities
will be minimal and will be limited to
Level B harassment, as described in the
documents associated with the initial
IHA.
Detailed Description of the Activity
A detailed description of rocky
intertidal monitoring survey activities
for which take is authorized here may
be found in the Notices of the Proposed
and Final IHA for the initial IHA.
Overall, the specified geographic region,
the amount of activity, and the nature of
the activities are identical to those
described in previous notices. The
frequency of visits and total visits to a
particular site may vary across years,
and within an annual plan once
submitted, but the description of the
action and the marine mammal analysis
included in the 2018 IHA were designed
to capture such variations. As noted
above, 154 sites are visited and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8317
surveyed as part of the research,
although take of marine mammals does
not occur at every site. A few sites are
visited monthly, while many sites are
surveyed between 1 and 4 times
annually. In 2018, a new site that had
never been surveyed previously
(Waddell) was added to the site
inventory as part of a study examining
ecosystem level effects of sea star
wasting syndrome (SSWS). There are
also six additional biodiversity sites
(i.e., Ecola, Roads End, Otter Rock, Seal
Rock, Graduation Point and North Head)
that were not visited or analyzed as part
of the initial IHA. The proposed
Renewal would be effective for a period
of one year from the date of issuance.
Description of Marine Mammals
A description of the marine mammals
in the areas of the activity for which
authorization of take is proposed may be
found in the Notice of the Proposed IHA
(83 FR 3308; February 23, 2018) for the
initial authorization. NMFS has
reviewed the monitoring data from the
initial IHA, recent draft Stock
Assessment Reports, information on
relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and
other scientific literature, and
determined that neither this nor any
other new information affects which
species or stocks have the potential to
be affected or the pertinent information
in the Description of the Marine
Mammals in the Area of Specified
Activities contained in the supporting
documents for the initial IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
and Their Habitat
A description of the potential effects
of the specified activity on marine
mammals and their habitat for the
activities for which take is proposed
may be found in the Notice of the
Proposed IHA (83 FR 3308; February 23,
2018) for the initial authorization.
NMFS has reviewed the monitoring data
from the initial IHA, recent draft Stock
Assessment Reports, information on
relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and
other scientific literature, and
determined that no new information
affects our initial analysis of impacts on
marine mammals and their habitat.
Estimated Take
Detailed descriptions of the methods
and inputs used to estimate take for the
specified activity are found in the
Federal Register Notices of the
Proposed (83 FR 3308; February 23,
2018) and Final IHA (83 FR 11696;
March 16, 2018) for the initial
authorization. As part of the initial IHA,
PISCO had estimated that Level B
harassment of marine mammals was
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
8318
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2019 / Notices
likely to occur at 16 sites (see 2018
application), conservatively based on
the predicted number of visits to the
sites and historical observational data
(using maximum observations). These
same 16 sites would be surveyed under
the proposed Renewal. PISCO is
requesting and NMFS is proposing to
authorize the same level of take for the
16 sites as was authorized under the
initial IHA.
PISCO provided a preliminary draft
marine mammal monitoring report
covering March 12, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 and recorded take by
Level B harassment of 87 harbor seals
and 1 California sea lion. No northern
elephant seal takes were reported. This
is well below the total take numbers
authorized by NMFS in 2018 (255
harbor seal, 90 California sea lion, and
50 northern elephant seal). The draft
monitoring report indicated that take by
Level B harassment was recorded at
eight sites in 2018 (of 64 sites visited
and 5 of the 16 sites at which take was
expected). At one site (Government
Point), 20 more harbor seals were taken
than were predicted at that site,
however, at other sites fewer marine
mammals were taken than predicted.
Variation in predicted marine mammal
presence is expected across sites, and,
further, as described in the 2018
application and IHA notices, the
number of predicted visits to a
particular site may also vary. However,
the conservative take estimate
methodology is expected to continue to
ensure that the total authorized take and
effect analysis remains appropriate.
There is one new site, Waddell, which
was not addressed in the initial IHA,
since PISCO had not secured funding
for the SSWS study when the initial
authorization was issued. PISCO did,
however, monitor and record
observations during 10 visits to Waddell
between March and December 2018
after funding had been secured and
recorded one harbor seal. Seals are
known to be rare at the Waddell site,
and with only a single observation over
a ten month period at this location,
PISCO and NMFS do not believe that
take is likely. Therefore, we are not
proposing to increase the total numbers
of authorized take for harbor seals.
There are also six biodiversity sites
which would be visited in 2019 that
were not visited or analyzed as part of
the initial IHA. However, based on
historical monitoring records the
presence of marine mammals is unlikely
and take is not proposed at any of these
sites.
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to
authorize take by Level B harassment at
the same levels that were authorized
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Mar 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
• Personnel shall vacate the study
area as soon as sampling of the site is
completed;
• Detailed monitoring information
TABLE 1—AUTHORIZED TAKE
will
include species counts, number of
NUMBERS BY LEVEL B HARASSMENT
disturbances, description of disturbance
behaviors, and information regarding
physical and biological conditions at a
Authorized
Species
given site;
take
• Submit a draft monitoring report to
Harbor seal ...........................
255 NMFS Office of Protected Resources
California sea lion .................
90 within 60 days after the conclusion of
Northern elephant seal .........
50 the 2018–2019 field season or 60 days
prior to the start of the next field season
Description of Proposed Mitigation,
if a new IHA will be requested; and
Monitoring and Reporting Measures
• Reporting injured or dead marine
mammals to appropriate authorities.
The proposed mitigation, monitoring,
Public Comments
and reporting measures included as
requirements in this authorization are
As noted previously, NMFS published
identical to those included in the
a notice of a proposed IHA (83 FR 3308;
Federal Register Notice announcing the February 23, 2018) and solicited public
proposed issuance of the initial IHA.
comments on both our proposal to issue
Additionally, the discussion of the least the initial IHA for rocky intertidal
practicable adverse impact included in
monitoring surveys and on the potential
that document and the Notice of
for a Renewal, should certain
issuance of the IHA remains accurate.
requirements be met. All public
The following measures, which are
comments were addressed in the notice
identical to those in the initial IHA, are
announcing the issuance of the 2018
proposed here for the Renewal:
IHA (83 FR 11696; March 16, 2018).
• Researchers shall observe a site
Below, we describe how we have
from a distance, using binoculars if
addressed, with updated information
necessary, to detect any marine
where appropriate, any comments
mammals prior to approach to
received that specifically pertain to the
determine if mitigation is required;
Renewal of the 2018 IHA.
Comment: The Commission requested
• Researchers shall approach a site
clarification of certain issues associated
with caution (slowly and quietly), keep
with NMFS’s notice that one-year
bodies low to the ground and avoid
pinnipeds along access ways to sites, by Renewals could be issued in certain
limited circumstances and expressed
locating and taking a different access
concern that the process would bypass
way if possible;
the public notice and comment
• Researchers shall keep a safe
requirements. The Commission also
distance from and not approach any
suggested that NMFS should discuss the
marine mammal while conducting
possibility of Renewals through a more
research, unless it is absolutely
general route, such as a rulemaking,
necessary to flush a marine mammal in
instead of notice in a specific
order to continue conducting research
authorization. The Commission further
(i.e., if a site cannot be accessed or
recommended that if NMFS did not
sampled due to the presence of
pursue a more general route, that the
pinnipeds);
agency provide the Commission and the
• Researchers shall monitor the
public with a legal analysis supporting
offshore area for predators (such as
our conclusion that this process is
killer whales and white sharks) and
consistent with the requirements of
avoid flushing of pinnipeds when
section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA.
predators are observed in nearshore
Response: The notice of the proposed
waters;
initial IHA expressly notified and
• Intentional flushing shall be
invited comment from the public on the
avoided if pups are present. Staff shall
possibility that under certain, limited
reschedule work at sites where pups are conditions the applicant could seek a
present, unless other means of
Renewal IHA for an additional year. The
accomplishing the work can be done
notice described the conditions under
without causing disturbance to mothers which such a Renewal request could be
and dependent pups;
considered and expressly sought public
• Any site where Steller sea lions,
comment in the event such a Renewal
northern fur seals, or Guadalupe fur
were sought. Further, since issuance of
seals are present shall not be
the initial IHA NMFS has modified the
approached and shall be sampled at a
Renewal process to provide notice
later date;
through the Federal Register and an
under the initial IHA as shown in Table
1 below.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
8319
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2019 / Notices
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
additional 15-day public comment
period at the time the Renewal IHA is
requested. NMFS also will provide
direct notice of the proposed Renewal to
those who commented on the initial
IHA, to provide an opportunity to
submit any additional comments.
We appreciate the Commission’s
suggestion that NMFS discuss the
potential for IHA Renewals through a
more general route, such as a
rulemaking. However, utilizing the
public comment process associated with
IHAs is more efficient for the agency,
while still providing for appropriate
public input into NMFS’ decisionmaking. Further, NMFS’ recent
modification to the Renewal process
(i.e., soliciting additional public
comment at the time of a Renewal
request) should alleviate the
Commission’s concern about the lack of
additional public comment and need for
a more general rulemaking.
For more information, NMFS has
published a description of the Renewal
process on our website (available at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/iharenewals).
Preliminary Determinations
In the context of the activities that
will result in take of marine mammals,
the rocky intertidal monitoring surveys
planned by PISCO for 2019 are nearly
identical to those conducted under the
initial IHA in 2018. A new SSWS and
six biodiversity sites would be visited
under the proposed Renewal that were
not analyzed for the initial IHA, but no
takes are anticipated or requested for
these locations. These activities could
result in Level B harassment consisting
of temporary, short-term behavioral
disturbance. In analyzing the effects of
the activities in the initial IHA, and in
consideration of the implementation of
the required mitigation, NMFS
determined that the total marine
mammal take from PISCO’s rocky
intertidal monitoring program would
not adversely affect annual rates of
recruitment or survival and, therefore,
would have a negligible impact on the
affected species or stocks. NMFS also
concluded that the numbers of animals
authorized for take could be considered
small relative to the relevant species or
stocks (0.65¥0.82 percent for harbor
seals, and <0.01 percent for California
sea lions and northern elephant seals).
As discussed above, the same amount of
take is proposed for authorization under
this Renewal.
Based on the information and analysis
contained here and in the referenced
documents, NMFS has determined the
following: (1) The required mitigation
measures will effect the least practicable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Mar 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
impact on marine mammal species or
stocks and their habitat; (2) the
authorized takes will have a negligible
impact on the affected marine mammal
species or stocks; (3) the authorized
takes represent small numbers of marine
mammals relative to the affected stock
abundances; (4) PISCO’s activities will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on taking for subsistence purposes as no
relevant subsistence uses of marine
mammals are implicated by this action;
and (5) appropriate monitoring and
reporting requirements are included.
Endangered Species Act
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS
ANNOUNCEMENT: 84 FR 7044, March 1,
2019.
PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF
THE MEETING: 10:00 a.m., Thursday,
March 7, 2019.
CHANGES IN THE MEETING:
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA: 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal
agency insure that any action it
authorizes, funds, or carries out is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. To ensure
ESA compliance for the issuance of
IHAs, NMFS consults internally, in this
case with the ESA Interagency
Cooperation Division whenever we
authorize take for endangered or
threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed
species is authorized or expected to
result from this activity. Therefore,
NMFS has determined that formal
consultation under section 7 of the ESA
is not required for this action.
Proposed Renewal and Request for
Public Comment
As a result of these preliminary
determinations, NMFS proposes to issue
an IHA to PISCO for conducting rocky
intertidal monitoring surveys off the
coasts of Oregon and California for a
period of one year, provided the
previously described mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated. A draft of the
proposed IHA can be found at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
incidental-take-authorizations-undermarine-mammal-protection-act. We
request comment on our analyses, the
proposed Renewal, and any other aspect
of this Notice. Please include with your
comments any supporting data or
literature citations to help inform our
final decision on the request for MMPA
authorization.
Dated: March 1, 2019.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the
Commission, 202–418–5964.
Dated: March 5, 2019.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–04272 Filed 3–5–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
Wednesday, March 6,
2019; 3:00 p.m.*
TIME AND DATE:
Hearing Room 420, Bethesda
Towers, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814.
PLACE:
Commission Meeting—Closed
to the Public.
STATUS:
Compliance
Matters: Staff will brief the Commission
on the status of a compliance
enforcement program.
MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, Division of
the Secretariat, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504–7479.
* The Commission unanimously
determined by recorded vote that
Agency business requires calling the
meeting without seven calendar days
advance public notice.
Dated: March 5, 2019.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–04238 Filed 3–5–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
[FR Doc. 2019–04077 Filed 3–6–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
The meeting
has been cancelled.
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8316-8319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04077]
[[Page 8316]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XG817
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal Monitoring Surveys
Along the Oregon and California Coasts
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; incidental harassment authorization; request for
comments on proposed Renewal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS received a request from the Partnership for
Interdisciplinary Study of Coastal Oceans (PISCO) at the University of
California Santa Cruz (UCSC) for the Renewal of their currently active
incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to take marine mammals
incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring surveys along the coasts of
Oregon and California. These activities are nearly identical to those
covered in the current authorization. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act, prior to issuing the currently active IHA, NMFS
requested comments on both the proposed IHA and the potential for
renewing the initial authorization if certain requirements were
satisfied. The Renewal requirements have been satisfied and NMFS is now
providing an additional 15-day comment period to allow for any
additional comments on the proposed Renewal not previously provided
during the initial 30-day comment period. Any comments received on the
potential Renewal, along with relevant comments on the initial IHA,
have been considered in the development of this proposed IHA Renewal,
and a summary of agency responses to applicable comments is included in
this notice. NMFS will consider any additional public comments prior to
making any final decision on the issuance of the requested Renewal, and
agency responses will be summarized in the final notice of our
decision.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than March
22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service. Physical comments should be sent to
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 and electronic comments
should be sent to ITP.Pauline@noaa.gov.
Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the
end of the comment period. Comments received electronically, including
all attachments, must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. Attachments
to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel or
Adobe PDF file formats only. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted online at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/node/23111 without change. All personal
identifying information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Pauline, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401. Electronic copies of the original
application, Renewal request, and supporting documents (including NMFS
Federal Register notices of the original proposed and final
authorizations, and the previous IHA), as well as a list of the
references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act. In case of problems accessing these
documents, please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) prohibits the ``take'' of
marine mammals, with certain exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D)
of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce
(as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens
who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and
either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed incidental take authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses
(where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods
of taking and other ``means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact'' on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of such species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to here as ``mitigation
measures''). Monitoring and reporting of such takings are also
required. The meaning of key terms such as ``take,'' ``harassment,''
and ``negligible impact'' can be found in section 3 of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1362) and the agency's regulations at 50 CFR 216.103.
50 CFR 216.107(e) of NMFS' regulations implementing the MMPA
indicate that IHAs may be renewed for additional periods of time not to
exceed one year for each reauthorization. In the notice of proposed IHA
for the initial authorization, NMFS described the circumstances under
which we would consider issuing a Renewal for this activity, and
requested public comment on a potential Renewal under those
circumstances. Specifically, on a case-by-case basis, NMFS may issue a
one-year IHA Renewal when (1) another year of identical or nearly
identical activities as described in the Specified Activities section
is planned or (2) the activities would not be completed by the time the
IHA expires and a second IHA would allow for completion of the
activities beyond that described in the Dates and Duration section,
provided all of the following conditions are met:
A request for Renewal is received no later than 60 days
prior to expiration of the current IHA.
The request for Renewal must include the following:
(1) An explanation that the activities to be conducted beyond the
initial dates either are identical to the previously analyzed
activities or include changes so minor (e.g., reduction in pile size)
that the changes do not affect the previous analyses, take estimates,
or mitigation and monitoring requirements.
(2) A preliminary monitoring report showing the results of the
required monitoring to date and an explanation showing that the
monitoring results do not indicate impacts of a scale or nature not
previously analyzed or authorized.
Upon review of the request for Renewal, the status of the
affected species or stocks, and any other pertinent information, NMFS
determines that there are no more than minor changes in the activities,
the mitigation and monitoring measures remain the same and appropriate,
and the initial findings remain valid.
[[Page 8317]]
An additional public comment period of 15 days (for a total of 45
days), with direct notice by email, phone, or postal service to
commenters on the initial IHA, is provided to allow for any additional
comments on the proposed Renewal. A description of the Renewal process
may be found on our website at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/iha-renewals.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA;
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A,
NMFS must review our proposed action (i.e., the issuance of an IHA)
with respect to potential impacts on the human environment.
This action is consistent with categories of activities identified
in Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no anticipated serious injury or
mortality) of the Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative Order 216-
6A, which do not individually or cumulatively have the potential for
significant impacts on the quality of the human environment and for
which we have not identified any extraordinary circumstances that would
preclude this categorical exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the issuance of the Renewal IHA qualifies
to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review.
We will review all comments submitted in response to this notice
prior to concluding our NEPA process or making a final decision on the
IHA request.
History of Request
On March 8, 2018, NMFS issued an IHA to PISCO to take marine
mammals incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring surveys at multiple
locations on the coasts of Oregon and California (83 FR 11696; March
16, 2018), effective from March 12, 2018 through March 11, 2019. This
multiyear annual survey involves surveying rocky intertidal zones in a
number of coastal locations in Oregon and California. NMFS has
previously issued five IHAs for this ongoing survey project (77 FR
72327, December 5, 2012; 78 FR 79403, December 30, 2013; 79 FR 73048,
December 9, 2014; 81 FR 7319, February 2, 2016; 82 FR 12568, March 6,
2017). On January 8, 2019, NMFS received an application for a Renewal
of that 2018 IHA (referred to as the initial IHA henceforth). As
described in the application for Renewal, the activities for which
incidental take is requested are nearly identical to those covered in
the initial IHA. As required, the applicant also provided a preliminary
monitoring report (available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-take-authorizations-research-and-other-activities) which confirms that the applicant has
implemented the required mitigation and monitoring, and which also
shows that no impacts of a scale or nature not previously analyzed or
authorized have occurred as a result of the activities conducted.
Description of the Specified Activities and Anticipated Impacts
PISCO proposes to continue rocky intertidal monitoring work that
has been ongoing for 20 years. PISCO focuses on understanding the
nearshore ecosystems of the U.S. west coast through a number of
interdisciplinary collaborations. The program integrates long-term
monitoring of ecological and oceanographic processes at 154 separate
sites with experimental work in the lab and field. Research is
conducted throughout the year along the California and Oregon coasts
and will continue as long as funding is available. The research being
conducted under the Renewal would be nearly identical to that analyzed
under the initial IHA (one new site added, but no take of marine
mammals anticipated), and the anticipated impacts are identical.
Researchers accessing and conducting research activities on the sites
may occasionally cause behavioral disturbance (or Level B harassment)
of three pinniped species at 16 of the sites (described in PISCOs
application for the 2018 IHA). PISCO's request is for take of
California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), harbor seals (Phoca
vitulina richardii), and northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris). PISCO expects that the disturbance to pinnipeds from
the research activities will be minimal and will be limited to Level B
harassment, as described in the documents associated with the initial
IHA.
Detailed Description of the Activity
A detailed description of rocky intertidal monitoring survey
activities for which take is authorized here may be found in the
Notices of the Proposed and Final IHA for the initial IHA. Overall, the
specified geographic region, the amount of activity, and the nature of
the activities are identical to those described in previous notices.
The frequency of visits and total visits to a particular site may vary
across years, and within an annual plan once submitted, but the
description of the action and the marine mammal analysis included in
the 2018 IHA were designed to capture such variations. As noted above,
154 sites are visited and surveyed as part of the research, although
take of marine mammals does not occur at every site. A few sites are
visited monthly, while many sites are surveyed between 1 and 4 times
annually. In 2018, a new site that had never been surveyed previously
(Waddell) was added to the site inventory as part of a study examining
ecosystem level effects of sea star wasting syndrome (SSWS). There are
also six additional biodiversity sites (i.e., Ecola, Roads End, Otter
Rock, Seal Rock, Graduation Point and North Head) that were not visited
or analyzed as part of the initial IHA. The proposed Renewal would be
effective for a period of one year from the date of issuance.
Description of Marine Mammals
A description of the marine mammals in the areas of the activity
for which authorization of take is proposed may be found in the Notice
of the Proposed IHA (83 FR 3308; February 23, 2018) for the initial
authorization. NMFS has reviewed the monitoring data from the initial
IHA, recent draft Stock Assessment Reports, information on relevant
Unusual Mortality Events, and other scientific literature, and
determined that neither this nor any other new information affects
which species or stocks have the potential to be affected or the
pertinent information in the Description of the Marine Mammals in the
Area of Specified Activities contained in the supporting documents for
the initial IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
A description of the potential effects of the specified activity on
marine mammals and their habitat for the activities for which take is
proposed may be found in the Notice of the Proposed IHA (83 FR 3308;
February 23, 2018) for the initial authorization. NMFS has reviewed the
monitoring data from the initial IHA, recent draft Stock Assessment
Reports, information on relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and other
scientific literature, and determined that no new information affects
our initial analysis of impacts on marine mammals and their habitat.
Estimated Take
Detailed descriptions of the methods and inputs used to estimate
take for the specified activity are found in the Federal Register
Notices of the Proposed (83 FR 3308; February 23, 2018) and Final IHA
(83 FR 11696; March 16, 2018) for the initial authorization. As part of
the initial IHA, PISCO had estimated that Level B harassment of marine
mammals was
[[Page 8318]]
likely to occur at 16 sites (see 2018 application), conservatively
based on the predicted number of visits to the sites and historical
observational data (using maximum observations). These same 16 sites
would be surveyed under the proposed Renewal. PISCO is requesting and
NMFS is proposing to authorize the same level of take for the 16 sites
as was authorized under the initial IHA.
PISCO provided a preliminary draft marine mammal monitoring report
covering March 12, 2018 through December 31, 2018 and recorded take by
Level B harassment of 87 harbor seals and 1 California sea lion. No
northern elephant seal takes were reported. This is well below the
total take numbers authorized by NMFS in 2018 (255 harbor seal, 90
California sea lion, and 50 northern elephant seal). The draft
monitoring report indicated that take by Level B harassment was
recorded at eight sites in 2018 (of 64 sites visited and 5 of the 16
sites at which take was expected). At one site (Government Point), 20
more harbor seals were taken than were predicted at that site, however,
at other sites fewer marine mammals were taken than predicted.
Variation in predicted marine mammal presence is expected across sites,
and, further, as described in the 2018 application and IHA notices, the
number of predicted visits to a particular site may also vary. However,
the conservative take estimate methodology is expected to continue to
ensure that the total authorized take and effect analysis remains
appropriate.
There is one new site, Waddell, which was not addressed in the
initial IHA, since PISCO had not secured funding for the SSWS study
when the initial authorization was issued. PISCO did, however, monitor
and record observations during 10 visits to Waddell between March and
December 2018 after funding had been secured and recorded one harbor
seal. Seals are known to be rare at the Waddell site, and with only a
single observation over a ten month period at this location, PISCO and
NMFS do not believe that take is likely. Therefore, we are not
proposing to increase the total numbers of authorized take for harbor
seals. There are also six biodiversity sites which would be visited in
2019 that were not visited or analyzed as part of the initial IHA.
However, based on historical monitoring records the presence of marine
mammals is unlikely and take is not proposed at any of these sites.
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to authorize take by Level B harassment
at the same levels that were authorized under the initial IHA as shown
in Table 1 below.
Table 1--Authorized Take Numbers by Level B Harassment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized
Species take
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor seal............................................. 255
California sea lion..................................... 90
Northern elephant seal.................................. 50
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Proposed Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Measures
The proposed mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures
included as requirements in this authorization are identical to those
included in the Federal Register Notice announcing the proposed
issuance of the initial IHA. Additionally, the discussion of the least
practicable adverse impact included in that document and the Notice of
issuance of the IHA remains accurate. The following measures, which are
identical to those in the initial IHA, are proposed here for the
Renewal:
Researchers shall observe a site from a distance, using
binoculars if necessary, to detect any marine mammals prior to approach
to determine if mitigation is required;
Researchers shall approach a site with caution (slowly and
quietly), keep bodies low to the ground and avoid pinnipeds along
access ways to sites, by locating and taking a different access way if
possible;
Researchers shall keep a safe distance from and not
approach any marine mammal while conducting research, unless it is
absolutely necessary to flush a marine mammal in order to continue
conducting research (i.e., if a site cannot be accessed or sampled due
to the presence of pinnipeds);
Researchers shall monitor the offshore area for predators
(such as killer whales and white sharks) and avoid flushing of
pinnipeds when predators are observed in nearshore waters;
Intentional flushing shall be avoided if pups are present.
Staff shall reschedule work at sites where pups are present, unless
other means of accomplishing the work can be done without causing
disturbance to mothers and dependent pups;
Any site where Steller sea lions, northern fur seals, or
Guadalupe fur seals are present shall not be approached and shall be
sampled at a later date;
Personnel shall vacate the study area as soon as sampling
of the site is completed;
Detailed monitoring information will include species
counts, number of disturbances, description of disturbance behaviors,
and information regarding physical and biological conditions at a given
site;
Submit a draft monitoring report to NMFS Office of
Protected Resources within 60 days after the conclusion of the 2018-
2019 field season or 60 days prior to the start of the next field
season if a new IHA will be requested; and
Reporting injured or dead marine mammals to appropriate
authorities.
Public Comments
As noted previously, NMFS published a notice of a proposed IHA (83
FR 3308; February 23, 2018) and solicited public comments on both our
proposal to issue the initial IHA for rocky intertidal monitoring
surveys and on the potential for a Renewal, should certain requirements
be met. All public comments were addressed in the notice announcing the
issuance of the 2018 IHA (83 FR 11696; March 16, 2018). Below, we
describe how we have addressed, with updated information where
appropriate, any comments received that specifically pertain to the
Renewal of the 2018 IHA.
Comment: The Commission requested clarification of certain issues
associated with NMFS's notice that one-year Renewals could be issued in
certain limited circumstances and expressed concern that the process
would bypass the public notice and comment requirements. The Commission
also suggested that NMFS should discuss the possibility of Renewals
through a more general route, such as a rulemaking, instead of notice
in a specific authorization. The Commission further recommended that if
NMFS did not pursue a more general route, that the agency provide the
Commission and the public with a legal analysis supporting our
conclusion that this process is consistent with the requirements of
section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA.
Response: The notice of the proposed initial IHA expressly notified
and invited comment from the public on the possibility that under
certain, limited conditions the applicant could seek a Renewal IHA for
an additional year. The notice described the conditions under which
such a Renewal request could be considered and expressly sought public
comment in the event such a Renewal were sought. Further, since
issuance of the initial IHA NMFS has modified the Renewal process to
provide notice through the Federal Register and an
[[Page 8319]]
additional 15-day public comment period at the time the Renewal IHA is
requested. NMFS also will provide direct notice of the proposed Renewal
to those who commented on the initial IHA, to provide an opportunity to
submit any additional comments.
We appreciate the Commission's suggestion that NMFS discuss the
potential for IHA Renewals through a more general route, such as a
rulemaking. However, utilizing the public comment process associated
with IHAs is more efficient for the agency, while still providing for
appropriate public input into NMFS' decision-making. Further, NMFS'
recent modification to the Renewal process (i.e., soliciting additional
public comment at the time of a Renewal request) should alleviate the
Commission's concern about the lack of additional public comment and
need for a more general rulemaking.
For more information, NMFS has published a description of the
Renewal process on our website (available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/iha-renewals).
Preliminary Determinations
In the context of the activities that will result in take of marine
mammals, the rocky intertidal monitoring surveys planned by PISCO for
2019 are nearly identical to those conducted under the initial IHA in
2018. A new SSWS and six biodiversity sites would be visited under the
proposed Renewal that were not analyzed for the initial IHA, but no
takes are anticipated or requested for these locations. These
activities could result in Level B harassment consisting of temporary,
short-term behavioral disturbance. In analyzing the effects of the
activities in the initial IHA, and in consideration of the
implementation of the required mitigation, NMFS determined that the
total marine mammal take from PISCO's rocky intertidal monitoring
program would not adversely affect annual rates of recruitment or
survival and, therefore, would have a negligible impact on the affected
species or stocks. NMFS also concluded that the numbers of animals
authorized for take could be considered small relative to the relevant
species or stocks (0.65-0.82 percent for harbor seals, and <0.01
percent for California sea lions and northern elephant seals). As
discussed above, the same amount of take is proposed for authorization
under this Renewal.
Based on the information and analysis contained here and in the
referenced documents, NMFS has determined the following: (1) The
required mitigation measures will effect the least practicable impact
on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat; (2) the
authorized takes will have a negligible impact on the affected marine
mammal species or stocks; (3) the authorized takes represent small
numbers of marine mammals relative to the affected stock abundances;
(4) PISCO's activities will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on
taking for subsistence purposes as no relevant subsistence uses of
marine mammals are implicated by this action; and (5) appropriate
monitoring and reporting requirements are included.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA: 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal agency insure that any
action it authorizes, funds, or carries out is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated
critical habitat. To ensure ESA compliance for the issuance of IHAs,
NMFS consults internally, in this case with the ESA Interagency
Cooperation Division whenever we authorize take for endangered or
threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed species is authorized or expected
to result from this activity. Therefore, NMFS has determined that
formal consultation under section 7 of the ESA is not required for this
action.
Proposed Renewal and Request for Public Comment
As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to
issue an IHA to PISCO for conducting rocky intertidal monitoring
surveys off the coasts of Oregon and California for a period of one
year, provided the previously described mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated. A draft of the proposed IHA
can be found at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act. We request comment
on our analyses, the proposed Renewal, and any other aspect of this
Notice. Please include with your comments any supporting data or
literature citations to help inform our final decision on the request
for MMPA authorization.
Dated: March 1, 2019.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-04077 Filed 3-6-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P