Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments, 7810-7813 [2019-03856]
Download as PDF
7810
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
radius of King Salmon Airport, AK, and
within 5 miles north and 9 miles south of the
132° radial of the King Salmon VORTAC, AK,
extending from the King Salmon VORTAC,
AK, to 36 miles southeast of the King Salmon
VORTAC, AK, and within 3.9 miles either
side of the 312° radial of the King Salmon
VORTAC, AK, extending from the 6.9-mile
radius to 13.9 miles northwest of the King
Salmon VORTAC, AK; and that airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet above the
surface within a 73-mile radius of the King
Salmon Airport, AK, excluding that airspace
extending beyond 12 miles of the shoreline.
AAL AK E5
Kodiak, AK [Amended]
Kodiak Airport, AK
(Lat. 57°44′59″ N, long. 152°29′38″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 6.9-mile
radius of Kodiak Airport, AK, and within 3.1
miles either side of the 072° bearing from
Kodiak Airport, AK, extending from the 6.9mile radius from the airport, to 12.2 miles
east of the airport, and within 1 mile either
side of the 091° bearing from Kodiak Airport,
AK, extending from the 6.9-mile radius from
the airport, to 8.2 miles east of the airport,
and that airspace extending upward from
1,200 feet above the surface within a 73-mile
radius of the Kodiak Airport, AK, excluding
that airspace extending beyond 12 miles of
the shoreline.
AAL AK E5
Manokotak, AK [Amended]
Manokotak Airport, AK
(Lat. 58°55′55″ N, long. 158°54′07″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile
radius of Manokotak Airport, AK; and that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet
above the surface within a 74-mile radius of
Manokotak Airport, AK, excluding that
airspace extending beyond 12 miles of the
shoreline.
AAL AK E5
[Amended]
Middleton Island, AK
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Middleton Island Airport, AK
(Lat. 59°27′00″ N, long. 146°18′26″ W)
Middleton Island VOR/DME
(Lat. 59°25′18″ N, long. 146°21′00″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile
radius of Middleton Island Airport, and
within 4 miles either side of the 038° radial
of the Middleton Island VOR/DME extending
from the 6.5-mile radius to 12 miles northeast
of the VOR/DME, and that airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
within a 42-mile radius of the Middleton
Island VOR/DME, excluding that airspace
extending beyond 12 miles of the shoreline.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on February
20, 2019.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2019–03837 Filed 3–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review;’’
therefore, E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ does not apply.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 48
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 48
[Docket ID: DOD–2018–OS–0058]
Military personnel, Pensions.
RIN 0790–AK31
PART 48—[REMOVED]
Retired Serviceman’s Family
Protection Plan (RSFPP)
Under Secretary of Defense
(Personnel and Readiness), DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The final rule removes
Department of Defense (DoD)
regulations regarding the Retired
Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan
(RSFPP). The part contains information
for enrollment, designation of
beneficiaries, and general guidance for
the RSFPP program, which has been
closed to new applicants since 1972.
The only remaining relevant aspect of
the RSFPP program is the application
for benefits upon the death of a
participating retiree, which is
accomplished by completing the
necessary forms that are published on a
public website. This collection of
information is tied to statute, and thus
does not require an authorizing CFR
part. Accordingly, this part is outdated
and unnecessary and may be removed
from the CFR.
DATES: This rule is effective on March 5,
2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Corso, (703) 693–1059.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
was published on July 18, 1969. RSFPP
(authorized by 10 U.S.C. Chapter 73,
Subchapter I) was terminated as the
military retired pay annuity protection
plan on September 21, 1972, and
replaced by the Survivor Benefit Plan.
All elections under RSFPP are complete.
Upon the death of the Service member,
a qualified annuitant can apply for the
RSFPP annuity. This application is done
through the completion of two forms
(DD Form 2656–7 ‘‘Verification for
Survivor Annuity,’’ and SF 1174 ‘‘Claim
for Unpaid Compensation of Deceased
Member of the Uniformed Services’’).
No other requirements are made of the
annuitants. The forms are publicly
available on the DFAS website (https://
www.dfas.mil/retiredmilitary/survivors/
Retiree-death.html). The public is
provided notice in the Federal Register
of changes to these forms, and given the
opportunity to comment in accordance
with the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
This rule is not significant under
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Accordingly, by the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 48 is removed.
■
Dated: February 27, 2019.
Shelly E. Finke,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 2019–03889 Filed 3–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100, 110, 147, and 165
[Docket No. USCG–2018–1049]
Navigation and Navigable Waters;
Technical, Organizational, and
Conforming Amendments
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule makes nonsubstantive technical and conforming
amendments to existing Coast Guard
regulations. The Coast Guard is issuing
this technical amendment to conform to
the changes made by the Frank
LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization
Act of 2018, which redesignated
existing United States Code provisions
into new Titles and sections. This
technical amendment updates the
statutory authority citations for Coast
Guard regulations that establish safety
zones, security zones, special local
regulations, regulated navigation areas,
and anchorages. This rule will have no
substantive effect on the regulated
public.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective March
5, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket number
USCG–2018–1049, which is available at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this document call or
email Kate Sergent, Coast Guard;
telephone 202–372–3752, email
kate.e.sergent@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
to statutory authorities that were moved
by the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard
Authorization Act. The Coast Guard is
updating only these CFR parts with this
final rule because we frequently issue
temporary regulations to protect marine
events that rely on the statutory
authorities previously located in 33
U.S.C. 1221 through 1236 and 50 U.S.C.
191. These safety-oriented regulations
include safety zones, security zones,
regulated navigation areas, special local
regulations, safety zones on the outer
continental shelf, and anchorage
grounds. The Coast Guard will update
all of our other affected regulations and
their authority citations in one or more
future rulemakings.
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Discussion of the Rule
III. Regulatory History
IV. Basis and Purpose
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
III. Regulatory History
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Discussion of the Rule
On December 4, 2018, Congress
enacted the Frank LoBiondo Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Pub.
L. 115–282). The Frank LoBiondo Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 2018
redesignated multiple provisions within
Titles 14, 33, 46, and 50 of the United
States Code in an effort reorganize these
Titles. The Coast Guard often uses the
affected statutory provisions as
authority for issuing regulations related
to maritime safety and security.
Most significantly, the Frank
LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization
Act of 2018 redesignated the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act provisions
previously located in 33 U.S.C. 1221
through 1236, and with an exception
not relevant to this rule, moved those
provisions without substantive change
into Chapter 700 of Title 46 of the
United States Code.1 The new Chapter
700 of Title 46 is titled ‘‘Ports and
Waterways Safety’’. This rule replaces
the old statutory authority citations with
their correct statutory authorities.
The Coast Guard periodically issues
technical, organizational, and
conforming amendments to existing
regulations in title 33 of the CFR. These
‘‘technical amendments’’ provide the
public with more accurate and current
regulatory information, but do not
change the effect on the public of any
Coast Guard regulations.
This rule updates the authority
citations for the following parts of title
33 of the CFR: 100, 110, 147, and 165.
This rule also updates in text citations
1 The Act moved 33 U.S.C. 1223a, which governs
the use of electronic charts, to 46 U.S.C. 3105.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking for this rule.
Under Title 5 of the United States Code
(U.S.C.), Section 553(b)(A), the Coast
Guard finds that this final rule is
exempt from notice and public
comment rulemaking requirements
because these changes involve rules of
agency organization, procedure, or
practice. In addition, the Coast Guard
finds that notice and comment
procedures are unnecessary for this final
rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), as this
rule consists of only technical and
editorial corrections and these changes
will have no substantive effect on the
public. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that, for the same
reasons, good cause exists for making
this final rule effective upon publication
in the Federal Register.
IV. Basis and Purpose
This final rule makes technical and
editorial corrections in parts 100, 110,
147, and 165 of title 33 of the CFR.
These changes are necessary to update
the authority citations for existing
regulations and make other nonsubstantive amendments that improve
the clarity of the CFR. This rule does not
create or change any substantive
requirements.
This final rule is issued under the
authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 553; 14
U.S.C. 102 and 503; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or Executive
orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7811
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. Executive
Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs) directs
agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs and provides
that ‘‘for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be
identified for elimination, and that the
cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a
budgeting process.’’
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has not designated this rule a
significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it.
Because this rule is not a significant
regulatory action, this rule is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771. See the OMB
Memorandum titled ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771,
titled ‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (April 5,
2017). This rule involves nonsubstantive changes and internal agency
practices and procedures; it will not
impose any additional costs on the
public or the government. The
qualitative benefit of the nonsubstantive changes is increased clarity
of regulations and their authority. The
increased clarity of the CFR is created
by the correction of errors, removing
outdated references, and correcting
citations to match current statutory text.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
This rule is not preceded by a notice
of proposed rulemaking. Therefore, it is
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
7812
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
exempt from the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). The Regulatory Flexibility
Act does not apply when notice and
comment rulemaking is not required.
G. Taking of Private Property
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–
121, we offer to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520. This final rule will not change any
of the burdens in the collections
currently approved by OMB.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under Executive
Order 13132 and have determined that
it is consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Although this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630 (Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights).
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks). This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
will not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments),
because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use). We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act, codified as a
note to 15 U.S.C. 272, directs agencies
to use voluntary consensus standards in
their regulatory activities unless the
agency provides Congress, through
OMB, with an explanation of why using
these standards would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods;
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A final Record
of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. This final rule involves nonsubstantive technical, organizational,
and conforming amendments to existing
Coast Guard regulations. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded under
paragraph L54 of Appendix A, Table 1
of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 01. Paragraph L54 pertains
to regulations which are editorial or
procedural.
List of Subjects
33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety,
Navigation (water).
33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 100, 110, 147, and 165 as
follows:
Title 33—Navigation and Navigable
Waters
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
is revised to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–
2. In § 100.35(c), remove the text ‘‘33
U.S.C. 1233’’ and add in its place the
text ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70041’’.
i. Remove the text ‘‘the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act, 33 U.S.C. 1221–
1232’’ and add in its place the text ‘‘46
U.S.C. Chapter 700’’; and
■ ii. Remove the text ‘‘50 U.S.C. 191–
195’’ and add in its place the text ‘‘46
U.S.C. 70051–54’’.
§ 100.1401
§ 165.838
1.
§ 100.35
[Amended]
■
[Amended]
3. In § 100.1401(e), remove the text
‘‘33 U.S.C. 1233’’ and add in its place
the text ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70041’’.
■
■
[Amended]
10. Amend § 165.838 as follows:
a. In paragraph (b)(5), remove the text
‘‘the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, 33
U.S.C. 1221 et seq.’’ and add in its place
the text ‘‘46 U.S.C. Chapter 700’’.
■ b. In paragraph (i), remove the text
‘‘the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, 33
U.S.C. 1221 et seq.’’ and add in its place
the text ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70036 and 70041’’.
■
■
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
4. The authority citation for part 110
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071, 46 U.S.C.
70034; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
5. In § 110.1a, revise the section
heading and paragraph (a) introductory
text to read as follows:
■
Dated: February 27, 2019.
Katia Kroutil,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2019–03856 Filed 3–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
§ 110.1a Anchorages under Ports and
Waterways Safety provisions.
(a) The anchorages listed in this
section are regulated under 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 700, ‘‘Ports and Waterways
Safety’’:
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
Update: Enrollment—Provision of
Hospital and Outpatient Care to Medal
of Honor Veterans
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AQ34
6. The authority citation for part 147
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 544; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
7. The authority citation for part 165
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
8. In part 165:
a. Revise all references to ‘‘33 U.S.C.
1226’’ to read ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70116’’.
■ b. Revise all references to ‘‘33 U.S.C.
1231’’ to read ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70034’’.
■ c. Revise all references to ‘‘33 U.S.C.
1232’’ to read ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70036’’.
■ d. Revise all references to ‘‘50 U.S.C.
191’’ to read ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70051’’.
■ e. Revise all references to ‘‘50 U.S.C.
192’’ to read ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70052’’.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
■
■
§ 165.9
[Amended]
9. Amend § 165.9 as follows:
a. In paragraph (b), remove the text
‘‘the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, 33
U.S.C. 1221–1232’’ and add in its place
the text ‘‘46 U.S.C. 70001–70041’’.
■ b. In paragraph (c):
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
Department of Veterans Affairs
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its medical
regulations governing eligibility for VA
health care and copayment
requirements to conform to recent
statutory changes. VA is changing its
enrollment criteria to move Medal of
Honor recipients from priority category
three to priority category one, and
exempting recipients of the Medal of
Honor from copayments for inpatient
care, outpatient care, medications, and
extended care services.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacey Echols Sr., CP, FAC–P/PM,
Business Policy, VHA Member Services;
810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20420; (404) 828–5281. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Enrollment Eligibility
Section 1705 of title 38, United States
Code (38 U.S.C. 1705), requires VA to
implement a national enrollment system
to manage the delivery of its health care
services and also contains priority
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7813
categories for determining eligibility for
enrollment in VA’s health care system.
In its original enactment, section 1705
did not include receipt of the Medal of
Honor as a criterion for eligibility in a
priority category. See Public Law 104–
262 (October 9, 1996). In 2010, Congress
amended section 1705 by adding Medal
of Honor recipients to priority category
three. See Public Law 111–163 (May 5,
2010). VA has implemented section
1705 in regulation at 38 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 17.36.
In the Jeff Miller and Richard
Blumenthal Veterans Health Care and
Benefits Improvement Act of 2016,
Congress elevated Medal of Honor
recipients’ health care enrollment
eligibility from priority category three to
priority category one. Public Law (Pub.
L.) 114–315 (December 16, 2016).
This final rulemaking updates 38 CFR
17.36 to reflect the current statutory
requirement that VA place Medal of
Honor recipients in priority category
one. VA therefore is removing award of
the Medal of Honor as a criterion from
paragraph (b)(3) and inserting it as a
criterion in paragraph (b)(1).
Copayments
Several sections in Chapter 17 of title
38, U.S.C. require VA to collect
copayments from certain veterans for
various types of care and medication.
Section 1710 of 38 U.S.C., for example,
directs VA to provide hospital care and
medical services to numerous categories
of veterans, and requires VA to charge
certain categories of veterans
copayments for the care and services
provided. Section 1710B allows VA to
furnish extended care services to certain
categories of veterans, including several
categories who are not required to pay
copayments. Section 1722A requires VA
to charge copayments for medications,
excepting several categories of veterans
who are not required to pay
copayments. While Public Law 111–163
added Medal of Honor awardees to
Priority Group 3, it did not exempt these
veterans from VA copayment
requirements.
Section 603 of Public Law 114–315
amended 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(2)(D),
1710B(c)(2), and 1722A(a)(3) to afford
Medal of Honor recipients specific
exemptions to the copayments required
for hospital care and medical services,
extended care services, and
medications. VA has regulated
copayments for the aforementioned
benefits at 38 CFR 17.108, 17.110, and
17.111. This final rulemaking adds
§§ 17.108(d)(13), 17.110(c)(11), and
17.111(f)(10) to reflect the statutory
changes exempting Medal of Honor
recipients from copayments for the
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7810-7813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03856]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100, 110, 147, and 165
[Docket No. USCG-2018-1049]
Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and
Conforming Amendments
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule makes non-substantive technical and conforming
amendments to existing Coast Guard regulations. The Coast Guard is
issuing this technical amendment to conform to the changes made by the
Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018, which
redesignated existing United States Code provisions into new Titles and
sections. This technical amendment updates the statutory authority
citations for Coast Guard regulations that establish safety zones,
security zones, special local regulations, regulated navigation areas,
and anchorages. This rule will have no substantive effect on the
regulated public.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 5, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket number USCG-2018-1049, which is available
at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document
call or email Kate Sergent, Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-3752, email
kate.e.sergent@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 7811]]
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Discussion of the Rule
III. Regulatory History
IV. Basis and Purpose
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Discussion of the Rule
On December 4, 2018, Congress enacted the Frank LoBiondo Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-282). The Frank LoBiondo
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 redesignated multiple provisions
within Titles 14, 33, 46, and 50 of the United States Code in an effort
reorganize these Titles. The Coast Guard often uses the affected
statutory provisions as authority for issuing regulations related to
maritime safety and security.
Most significantly, the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization
Act of 2018 redesignated the Ports and Waterways Safety Act provisions
previously located in 33 U.S.C. 1221 through 1236, and with an
exception not relevant to this rule, moved those provisions without
substantive change into Chapter 700 of Title 46 of the United States
Code.\1\ The new Chapter 700 of Title 46 is titled ``Ports and
Waterways Safety''. This rule replaces the old statutory authority
citations with their correct statutory authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Act moved 33 U.S.C. 1223a, which governs the use of
electronic charts, to 46 U.S.C. 3105.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Coast Guard periodically issues technical, organizational, and
conforming amendments to existing regulations in title 33 of the CFR.
These ``technical amendments'' provide the public with more accurate
and current regulatory information, but do not change the effect on the
public of any Coast Guard regulations.
This rule updates the authority citations for the following parts
of title 33 of the CFR: 100, 110, 147, and 165. This rule also updates
in text citations to statutory authorities that were moved by the Frank
LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act. The Coast Guard is updating
only these CFR parts with this final rule because we frequently issue
temporary regulations to protect marine events that rely on the
statutory authorities previously located in 33 U.S.C. 1221 through 1236
and 50 U.S.C. 191. These safety-oriented regulations include safety
zones, security zones, regulated navigation areas, special local
regulations, safety zones on the outer continental shelf, and anchorage
grounds. The Coast Guard will update all of our other affected
regulations and their authority citations in one or more future
rulemakings.
III. Regulatory History
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking for this rule.
Under Title 5 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 553(b)(A),
the Coast Guard finds that this final rule is exempt from notice and
public comment rulemaking requirements because these changes involve
rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. In addition, the
Coast Guard finds that notice and comment procedures are unnecessary
for this final rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), as this rule consists of
only technical and editorial corrections and these changes will have no
substantive effect on the public. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that, for the same reasons, good cause exists for making
this final rule effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
IV. Basis and Purpose
This final rule makes technical and editorial corrections in parts
100, 110, 147, and 165 of title 33 of the CFR. These changes are
necessary to update the authority citations for existing regulations
and make other non-substantive amendments that improve the clarity of
the CFR. This rule does not create or change any substantive
requirements.
This final rule is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 553; 14 U.S.C. 102 and 503; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or Executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs) directs agencies to reduce regulation and control
regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and
controlled through a budgeting process.''
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it. Because this rule is
not a significant regulatory action, this rule is exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 13771. See the OMB Memorandum titled
``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, titled `Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017). This
rule involves non-substantive changes and internal agency practices and
procedures; it will not impose any additional costs on the public or
the government. The qualitative benefit of the non-substantive changes
is increased clarity of regulations and their authority. The increased
clarity of the CFR is created by the correction of errors, removing
outdated references, and correcting citations to match current
statutory text.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule is not preceded by a notice of proposed rulemaking.
Therefore, it is
[[Page 7812]]
exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612). The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply when
notice and comment rulemaking is not required.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. This final rule
will not change any of the burdens in the collections currently
approved by OMB.
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538,
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Although this rule will not result
in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 (Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights).
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045 (Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks). This
rule is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments),
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use). We have determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under that order because it is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, codified as a
note to 15 U.S.C. 272, directs agencies to use voluntary consensus
standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides
Congress, through OMB, with an explanation of why using these standards
would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test
methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices)
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. A
final Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated in the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. This final rule involves non-
substantive technical, organizational, and conforming amendments to
existing Coast Guard regulations. Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded under paragraph L54 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. Paragraph L54 pertains to regulations
which are editorial or procedural.
List of Subjects
33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).
33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR parts 100, 110, 147, and 165 as follows:
Title 33--Navigation and Navigable Waters
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 is revised to read as follows:
[[Page 7813]]
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
Sec. 100.35 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 100.35(c), remove the text ``33 U.S.C. 1233'' and add in
its place the text ``46 U.S.C. 70041''.
Sec. 100.1401 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 100.1401(e), remove the text ``33 U.S.C. 1233'' and add in
its place the text ``46 U.S.C. 70041''.
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
4. The authority citation for part 110 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071, 46 U.S.C. 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
5. In Sec. 110.1a, revise the section heading and paragraph (a)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 110.1a Anchorages under Ports and Waterways Safety provisions.
(a) The anchorages listed in this section are regulated under 46
U.S.C. Chapter 700, ``Ports and Waterways Safety'':
* * * * *
PART 147--SAFETY ZONES
0
6. The authority citation for part 147 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 544; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
7. The authority citation for part 165 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
8. In part 165:
0
a. Revise all references to ``33 U.S.C. 1226'' to read ``46 U.S.C.
70116''.
0
b. Revise all references to ``33 U.S.C. 1231'' to read ``46 U.S.C.
70034''.
0
c. Revise all references to ``33 U.S.C. 1232'' to read ``46 U.S.C.
70036''.
0
d. Revise all references to ``50 U.S.C. 191'' to read ``46 U.S.C.
70051''.
0
e. Revise all references to ``50 U.S.C. 192'' to read ``46 U.S.C.
70052''.
Sec. 165.9 [Amended]
0
9. Amend Sec. 165.9 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b), remove the text ``the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1221-1232'' and add in its place the text ``46 U.S.C.
70001-70041''.
0
b. In paragraph (c):
0
i. Remove the text ``the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, 33 U.S.C.
1221-1232'' and add in its place the text ``46 U.S.C. Chapter 700'';
and
0
ii. Remove the text ``50 U.S.C. 191-195'' and add in its place the text
``46 U.S.C. 70051-54''.
Sec. 165.838 [Amended]
0
10. Amend Sec. 165.838 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(5), remove the text ``the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act, 33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.'' and add in its place the text ``46
U.S.C. Chapter 700''.
0
b. In paragraph (i), remove the text ``the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.'' and add in its place the text ``46 U.S.C.
70036 and 70041''.
Dated: February 27, 2019.
Katia Kroutil,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2019-03856 Filed 3-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P