Air Plan Approval; Alabama; Regional Haze Progress Report, 7823-7825 [2019-03853]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Market Tests *
Customized Delivery
Global eCommerce Marketplace (GeM)
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–03929 Filed 3–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 49
[EPA–R08–OAR–2019–0037; FRL–9990–08–
Region 8]
Revision to Approval of Application
Submitted by Eastern Shoshone Tribe
and Northern Arapaho Tribe for
Treatment in a Similar Manner as a
State Under the Clean Air Act
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notification of final action.
AGENCY:
This document announces
that the EPA Regional Administrator for
Region 8 has revised the EPA’s
December 6, 2013 approval of an
application submitted by the Northern
Arapaho Tribe and Eastern Shoshone
Tribe (Tribes) of the Wind River Indian
Reservation for treatment in a similar
manner as a state (TAS) pursuant to the
Clean Air Act and the EPA’s
implementing regulations for purposes
of certain Clean Air Act provisions. This
revision is in accordance with a
decision of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit holding
that a 1905 Congressional Act
diminished the Wind River Indian
Reservation.
SUMMARY:
The EPA’s revision to the
decision approving the Tribes’ TAS
application was issued and took effect
on February 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may review a copy of
the EPA’s revision to the December 6,
2013 Wind River TAS decision, as well
as copies of the original December 6,
2013 TAS Decision Document and
associated attachments and supporting
information, at the EPA Region 8 Office,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. If you wish to review the
documents in hard copy, the EPA
requests that you contact the individual
listed below to view these documents.
You may view the hard copies of these
documents Monday through Friday,
8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding federal
holidays. If you wish to examine these
documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before the
day of your visit. Additionally, these
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
documents are available electronically.
The EPA has established a docket for
this notice under Docket ID No. EPA–
R08–OAR–2019–0037. All documents in
the docket are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov website. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
These documents are also available
electronically at: https://www2.epa.gov/
region8/tribal-assistance-program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Monica Morales, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6936,
morales.monica@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 17, 2008, as supplemented on
December 23, 2008, the Tribes
submitted their TAS application as
authorized by Clean Air Act section
301(d) (42 U.S.C. 7601(d)) and EPA
regulations at 40 CFR part 49. In their
application, the Tribes requested TAS
eligibility for purposes of Clean Air Act
provisions that generally relate to grant
funding (e.g., for air quality planning
purposes) (section 105 (42 U.S.C. 7405));
involvement in EPA national ambient
air quality redesignations for the
Reservation (section 107(d)(3) (42 U.S.C.
7407(d)(3)); receiving notices of,
reviewing, and/or commenting on
certain nearby permitting and sources
(sections 505(a)(2) (42 U.S.C.
7661d(a)(2)) and 126 (42 U.S.C. 7426);
receiving risk management plans of
certain stationary sources (section
112(r)(7)(B)(iii) (42 U.S.C.
7412(r)(7)(B)(iii)); and participation in
certain interstate and regional air
quality bodies (sections 169B (42 U.S.C.
7492), 176A (42 U.S.C. 7506a) and 184
(42 U.S.C. 7511c). On December 6, 2013,
the EPA Region 8 Regional
Administrator approved the Tribes’ TAS
application for purposes of
administering the specified functions
with respect to the Wind River Indian
Reservation. See 78 FR 76829
(December 19, 2013). As required by
EPA regulations, the EPA’s TAS
decision included a determination of
the geographic scope of the Tribes’
Reservation. Several parties filed timely
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7823
challenges to the geographic scope of
the EPA’s TAS decision in the United
States Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit. Those challenges resulted in a
final court decision holding that a 1905
Congressional Act (33 Stat. 1016 (1905))
diminished the Wind River Indian
Reservation. Wyoming v. EPA, 875 F.3d
505 (10th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S.
Ct. 2677 (2018). In accordance with that
final judicial decision, on February 25,
2019, the EPA Region 8 Regional
Administrator revised the geographic
scope of the original TAS approval by
excluding lands addressed in Article I of
the 1905 Act that have not been placed
into trust status. This revision rendered
the EPA’s TAS approval consistent with
the Tenth Circuit’s decision.
Judicial Review: Pursuant to section
307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
7607(b)(1)), Petitioners may seek
judicial review of this revision to the
TAS approval decision in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Any petition for
judicial review shall be filed within 60
days from the date this document
appears in the Federal Register, i.e., not
later than May 6, 2019.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Dated: February 27, 2019.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2019–03865 Filed 3–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0544; FRL–9990–31–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Alabama; Regional
Haze Progress Report
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Alabama
through the Alabama Department of
Environmental Management (ADEM)
with a letter dated June 26, 2018.
Alabama’s SIP revision (Progress
Report) addresses requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s
rules that require each state to submit
periodic reports describing progress
towards reasonable progress goals
(RPGs) established for regional haze and
a determination of the adequacy of the
State’s existing SIP addressing regional
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
7824
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
haze (regional haze plan). EPA is
approving Alabama’s determination that
the State’s regional haze plan is
adequate to meet these RPGs for the first
implementation period covering
through 2018 and requires no
substantive revision at this time.
DATES: This rule is effective April 4,
2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2018–0544. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad
Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers can be
reached via telephone at (404) 562–9089
or electronic mail at akers.brad@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
I. Background
States are required to submit regional
haze progress reports that evaluate
progress towards the RPGs for each
mandatory Class I Federal area 1 (Class
I area) within the state and for each
Class I area outside the state which may
be affected by emissions from within the
1 Areas designated as mandatory Class I Federal
areas consist of national parks exceeding 6,000
acres, wilderness areas and national memorial parks
exceeding 5,000 acres, and all international parks
that were in existence on August 7, 1977 (42 U.S.C.
7472(a)). These areas are listed at 40 CFR part 81,
subpart D.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
state. See 40 CFR 51.308(g). In addition,
the provisions of 40 CFR 51.308(h)
require states to submit, at the same
time as a 40 CFR 51.308(g) progress
report, a determination of the adequacy
of the state’s existing regional haze plan.
The first progress report is due five
years after submittal of the initial
regional haze plan and must be
submitted as a SIP revision. On June 26,
2018, ADEM submitted its Progress
Report which, among other things,
detailed the progress made in the first
period toward implementation of the
long term strategy outlined in the State’s
regional haze plan; the visibility
improvement measured at the Sipsey
Wilderness Area (the only Class I area
within Alabama); and a determination
of the adequacy of the State’s existing
regional haze plan.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) published on December 18,
2018 (83 FR 64797), EPA proposed to
approve Alabama’s Progress Report. The
details of Alabama’s submission and the
rationale for EPA’s action is explained
in the NPRM. Comments on the
proposed rulemaking were due on or
before January 8, 2019. EPA received no
adverse comments on the proposed
action. EPA received two supportive
comments which are included in the
docket for this final rule.
II. Final Action
EPA is finalizing approval of
Alabama’s June 26, 2018, Progress
Report as meeting the applicable
regional haze requirements set forth in
40 CFR 51.308(g) and (h).
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
7825
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by May 6, 2019. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: February 20, 2019.
Mary S. Walker,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart B—Alabama
2. Section 52.50(e), is amended by
adding an entry for ‘‘June 2018 Regional
Haze Progress Report’’ at the end of the
table to read as follows:
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
§ 52.50
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED ALABAMA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Name of nonregulatory SIP
provision
*
June 2018 Regional Haze
Progress Report.
*
*
Alabama .....................................
[FR Doc. 2019–03853 Filed 3–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–R03–OAR–2018–0304; FRL–9990–12–
Region 3]
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;
Allegheny County Health Department,
Withdrawal of Section 112(l)
Delegation Authority for the Chemical
Accident Prevention Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is notifying the public
that the Allegheny County Health
Department (ACHD) has completed the
regulatory process for voluntary
withdrawal from EPA’s delegation of
authority to enforce the chemical
accident prevention regulations under
the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA is
therefore amending the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) to indicate that
ACHD no longer has the delegated
authority to implement and enforce the
regulatory requirements. EPA is also
notifying the public that each facility
subject to the previously approved
ACHD delegated chemical accident
prevention program is required to
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
State
submittal date/
effective date
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
16:03 Mar 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
*
6/26/2018
EPA approval date
*
*
3/5/2019, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
maintain continuous compliance with
applicable requirements. This action is
being taken under the CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 4, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2018–0304. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Talley, (215) 814–2117, or by
email at talley.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) and 40 CFR part 63, subpart E,
authorizes EPA to approve of State, and
local, rules and programs to be
implemented and enforced in place of
certain CAA requirements, including
the chemical accident prevention
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
*
provisions set forth at 40 CFR part 68
(Chemical Accident Prevention
Regulations). EPA promulgated the
Chemical Accident Prevention
Regulations (or risk management
program (RMP) regulations) (RMP
regulations) pursuant to CAA Section
112(r)(7). By letter dated June 15, 2001,
ACHD requested delegation of authority
to implement and enforce the RMP
regulations for all sources, among other
requests for delegation of other
programs. On January 30, 2002, EPA
issued a direct final rule, which became
effective on April 1, 2002, approving
ACHD’s request for delegation of
authority to implement and enforce
EPA’s RMP regulations, which had been
adopted by reference from 40 CFR part
68, for all sources within Allegheny
County, Pennsylvania, subject to such
regulations. See 67 FR 4363 (January 30,
2002).
By letter dated July 28, 2017, ACHD
formally notified EPA of its intent to
voluntarily withdraw from EPA’s
delegation of authority to enforce the
RMP regulations. On June 22, 2018 (83
FR 29085), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In the
NPRM, EPA notified the public that
ACHD had completed the regulatory
process for voluntary withdrawal from
EPA’s delegation of authority to
implement and enforce the RMP
provisions of CAA section 112(r) and
proposed a revision to 40 CFR
63.99(a)(39)(v), codifying the
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7823-7825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03853]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0544; FRL-9990-31-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Alabama; Regional Haze Progress Report
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Alabama
through the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) with
a letter dated June 26, 2018. Alabama's SIP revision (Progress Report)
addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's
rules that require each state to submit periodic reports describing
progress towards reasonable progress goals (RPGs) established for
regional haze and a determination of the adequacy of the State's
existing SIP addressing regional
[[Page 7824]]
haze (regional haze plan). EPA is approving Alabama's determination
that the State's regional haze plan is adequate to meet these RPGs for
the first implementation period covering through 2018 and requires no
substantive revision at this time.
DATES: This rule is effective April 4, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0544. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers
can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or electronic mail at
akers.brad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
States are required to submit regional haze progress reports that
evaluate progress towards the RPGs for each mandatory Class I Federal
area \1\ (Class I area) within the state and for each Class I area
outside the state which may be affected by emissions from within the
state. See 40 CFR 51.308(g). In addition, the provisions of 40 CFR
51.308(h) require states to submit, at the same time as a 40 CFR
51.308(g) progress report, a determination of the adequacy of the
state's existing regional haze plan. The first progress report is due
five years after submittal of the initial regional haze plan and must
be submitted as a SIP revision. On June 26, 2018, ADEM submitted its
Progress Report which, among other things, detailed the progress made
in the first period toward implementation of the long term strategy
outlined in the State's regional haze plan; the visibility improvement
measured at the Sipsey Wilderness Area (the only Class I area within
Alabama); and a determination of the adequacy of the State's existing
regional haze plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Areas designated as mandatory Class I Federal areas consist
of national parks exceeding 6,000 acres, wilderness areas and
national memorial parks exceeding 5,000 acres, and all international
parks that were in existence on August 7, 1977 (42 U.S.C. 7472(a)).
These areas are listed at 40 CFR part 81, subpart D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on December 18,
2018 (83 FR 64797), EPA proposed to approve Alabama's Progress Report.
The details of Alabama's submission and the rationale for EPA's action
is explained in the NPRM. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due
on or before January 8, 2019. EPA received no adverse comments on the
proposed action. EPA received two supportive comments which are
included in the docket for this final rule.
II. Final Action
EPA is finalizing approval of Alabama's June 26, 2018, Progress
Report as meeting the applicable regional haze requirements set forth
in 40 CFR 51.308(g) and (h).
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
[[Page 7825]]
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 6, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 20, 2019.
Mary S. Walker,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart B--Alabama
0
2. Section 52.50(e), is amended by adding an entry for ``June 2018
Regional Haze Progress Report'' at the end of the table to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.50 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Alabama Non-Regulatory Provisions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of nonregulatory SIP Applicable submittal date/
provision geographic or effective EPA approval date Explanation
nonattainment area date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
June 2018 Regional Haze Progress Alabama............. 6/26/2018 3/5/2019, [Insert Federal Register ......................................
Report. citation].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-03853 Filed 3-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P