Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Delaware River, Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA, 6992-6994 [2019-03715]
Download as PDF
6992
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041(a).
2. Add § 100.T08–0058 to read as
follows:
■
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 100.T08–0058 Special Local Regulation;
Lake Pontchartrain, New Orleans, LA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
special local regulation: 30°03.056′ N/
090°15.489′ W to 30°02.500′ N/
090°13.547′ W to 30°02.717′ N/0
90°13.460′ W to 30°03.252′ N/090°′
15.374′ W.
(b) Effective period. This section is
effective from 10 a.m. through 5 p.m. on
June 23, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 100.35 of
this part, entry into or remaining within
this regulated area is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector New Orleans (COTP) or
designated representative. A designated
representative is a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard assigned to units under the
operational control of USCG Sector New
Orleans.
(2) Vessels requiring entry into this
regulated area must request permission
from the COTP or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF–FM Channel 16 or 67 or by
telephone at (504) 365–2200.
(3) Persons and vessels permitted to
enter this safety zone must transit at
their slowest safe speed and comply
with all lawful directions issued by the
COTP or the designated representative.
(4) No spectator vessel is allowed to
anchor, block, loiter, or impede the
through transit of participants or a
designated patrol vessel in the regulated
area during the effective dates and
times, unless cleared for entry by the
COTP or the designated representative.
(5) Any spectator vessel may anchor
outside the regulated area. Spectator
vessels may be moored to a waterfront
facility within the regulated area in such
a way that they do not interfere with the
progress of the event. Such mooring
have to be complete at least 30 minutes
prior to the establishment of the
regulated area and remain moored
through the duration of the event.
(6) The COTP or a designated
representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled
by a designated patrol vessel, a vessel
shall come to an immediate stop and
comply with the directions given.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion
from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
(7) The COTP or a designated
representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any
time it is deemed necessary for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Feb 28, 2019
Jkt 247001
protection of life or property. The COTP
or a designated representative will
terminate enforcement of the special
local regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or a designated representative will
inform the public of the enforcement
times and date for this regulated area
through Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as
appropriate.
Thorogood, Bridge Administration
Branch Fifth District, Coast Guard,
telephone 757–398–6557, email
Michael.R.Thorogood@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
April 1, 2019.
The Coast Guard anticipates that this
proposed rule will be effective from 8
a.m. on February 15, 2019, through 7:59
a.m. on September 17, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0228 using Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
On April 26, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a temporary deviation
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Delaware River, Burlington,
NJ and Bristol, PA’’ in the Federal
Register (83 FR 18226). This temporary
deviation was to facilitate bridge
maintenance and painting of the vertical
lift span of the drawbridge from May 1,
2018, through September 30, 2018.
During the planned maintenance period,
a work platform would have reduced
one half of the bridge span vertical
clearance to approximately 58 feet
above mean high water in the closed
position and approximately 132 feet
above mean high water in the open
position.
On August 9, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a cancellation of the
temporary deviation entitled
‘‘Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Delaware River, Burlington NJ and
Bristol, PA’’ in the Federal Register (83
FR 18226), in the Federal Register (83
FR 39361). The temporary deviation was
cancelled due to delays in performing
bridge maintenance outside the
navigation span, thereby eliminating the
need for a temporary deviation to
facilitate bridge maintenance in the
navigation span. Due to the cancellation
of the work, the platform was not
installed and the bridge is operating
under its regular operating schedule in
33 CFR 117.716 (a). In accordance with
33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge was
returned to its regular operating
schedule upon publication of the
cancellation.
The Burlington County Bridge
Commission, who owns and operates
the SR 413/Burlington-Bristol Bridge
across the Delaware River, mile 117.8,
between Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA,
has requested this modification to allow
the drawbridge to be maintained in the
closed-to-navigation position to
facilitate maintenance and painting of
the vertical lift span of the drawbridge.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Michael
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The SR 413/Burlington-Bristol Bridge
across the Delaware River, mile 117.8,
Dated: February 22, 2019.
K.M. Luttrell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2019–03645 Filed 2–28–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0228]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Delaware River, Burlington, NJ and
Bristol, PA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the SR 413/Burlington-Bristol
Bridge across the Delaware River, mile
117.8, between Burlington, NJ and
Bristol, PA. This proposed modification
will allow the drawbridge to be
maintained in closed-to-navigation and
is necessary to accommodate bridge
maintenance.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules
between Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA,
has a vertical clearance of 61 feet above
mean high water in the closed position
and 135 feet above mean high water in
the open position. The current operating
schedule for the drawbridge is
published in 33 CFR 117.716(a).
Under this proposed temporary final
rule, the drawbridge will be maintained
in the closed-to-navigation position and
open on signal if at least a two-hour
notice is given, from 8 a.m. on February
15, 2019, through 7:59 a.m. on
September 17, 2019. At all other times,
the drawbridge will operate per 33 CFR
117.716(a).
This proposed temporary final rule is
necessary to facilitate safe and effective
bridge maintenance and painting of the
vertical lift span of the drawbridge,
while providing for the reasonable
needs of navigation. Multiple work
platforms will reduce the entire bridge
span vertical clearance to approximately
58 feet above mean high water in the
closed position and approximately 132
feet above mean high water in the open
position. Maintenance personnel,
equipment and materials will be located
inside the work platforms while
maintenance and painting is being
performed. To facilitate an opening of
the bridge, equipment and materials
will need to be secured inside or
removed from the work platforms and
personnel will need to vacate the work
platforms.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the fact that vessels can still
transit the bridge on signal if at least a
two-hour notice is given.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Feb 28, 2019
Jkt 247001
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6993
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review, under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)
(e), of the Instruction.
A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration and a
Memorandum for the Record are not
required for this proposed rule. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
6994
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 117.716 by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.716
*
*
Delaware River.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
17:12 Feb 28, 2019
Jkt 247001
(c) The draw of the SR 413
(Burlington-Bristol) Bridge, mile 117.8,
between Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA,
shall open on signal if at least a twohour notice is given from 8 a.m. on
February 15, 2019, through 7:59 a.m. on
September 17, 2019.
Dated: February 13, 2019.
K.M. Smith,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019–03715 Filed 2–28–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0024]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Xterra Swim, Intracoastal
Waterway; Myrtle Beach, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway in Myrtle Beach,
South Carolina. This action is necessary
to provide for the safety of the
swimmers, participant vessels,
spectators, and the general public
during the swim portion of the Xterra
Triathlon. This proposed rulemaking
would prohibit non-participant vessels
and persons from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the safety zone unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2019–0024 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
Justin.C.Heck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On January 9, 2019, Go Race
Productions notified the Coast Guard
that it would be sponsoring the Xterra
Swim from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. on
April 14, 2019. Approximately 200
swimmers are anticipated to participate
in the swim portion of the event, which
is a 1500-yard course located on certain
waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway in Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina. The Captain of the Port
Charleston (COTP) has determined that
the potential hazards associated with
the swim portion of the Triathlon
constitute a safety concern for anyone
within the proposed safety zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure safety of life on the navigable
water of the United States during the
event. The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a temporary safety zone on the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway in Myrtle Beach,
South Carolina from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00
a.m. on April 14, 2019. The duration of
the safety zone is intended to ensure the
safety of life on the navigable waters of
the Intracoastal before, during, and after
the scheduled 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
swim portion of the Triathlon.
Approximately 200 participants are
expected to participate in the swim
portion of the race. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The Coast
Guard will provide notice of the safety
zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and onscene designated representatives. The
proposed regulatory text appears at the
end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6992-6994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03715]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2018-0228]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Delaware River, Burlington, NJ
and Bristol, PA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the SR 413/Burlington-Bristol Bridge across the Delaware River,
mile 117.8, between Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA. This proposed
modification will allow the drawbridge to be maintained in closed-to-
navigation and is necessary to accommodate bridge maintenance.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before April 1, 2019.
The Coast Guard anticipates that this proposed rule will be
effective from 8 a.m. on February 15, 2019, through 7:59 a.m. on
September 17, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0228 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Michael Thorogood, Bridge Administration Branch
Fifth District, Coast Guard, telephone 757-398-6557, email
Michael.R.Thorogood@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
On April 26, 2018, the Coast Guard published a temporary deviation
entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Delaware River, Burlington,
NJ and Bristol, PA'' in the Federal Register (83 FR 18226). This
temporary deviation was to facilitate bridge maintenance and painting
of the vertical lift span of the drawbridge from May 1, 2018, through
September 30, 2018. During the planned maintenance period, a work
platform would have reduced one half of the bridge span vertical
clearance to approximately 58 feet above mean high water in the closed
position and approximately 132 feet above mean high water in the open
position.
On August 9, 2018, the Coast Guard published a cancellation of the
temporary deviation entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Delaware River, Burlington NJ and Bristol, PA'' in the Federal Register
(83 FR 18226), in the Federal Register (83 FR 39361). The temporary
deviation was cancelled due to delays in performing bridge maintenance
outside the navigation span, thereby eliminating the need for a
temporary deviation to facilitate bridge maintenance in the navigation
span. Due to the cancellation of the work, the platform was not
installed and the bridge is operating under its regular operating
schedule in 33 CFR 117.716 (a). In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge was returned to its regular operating schedule upon
publication of the cancellation.
The Burlington County Bridge Commission, who owns and operates the
SR 413/Burlington-Bristol Bridge across the Delaware River, mile 117.8,
between Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA, has requested this modification
to allow the drawbridge to be maintained in the closed-to-navigation
position to facilitate maintenance and painting of the vertical lift
span of the drawbridge.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The SR 413/Burlington-Bristol Bridge across the Delaware River,
mile 117.8,
[[Page 6993]]
between Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA, has a vertical clearance of 61
feet above mean high water in the closed position and 135 feet above
mean high water in the open position. The current operating schedule
for the drawbridge is published in 33 CFR 117.716(a).
Under this proposed temporary final rule, the drawbridge will be
maintained in the closed-to-navigation position and open on signal if
at least a two-hour notice is given, from 8 a.m. on February 15, 2019,
through 7:59 a.m. on September 17, 2019. At all other times, the
drawbridge will operate per 33 CFR 117.716(a).
This proposed temporary final rule is necessary to facilitate safe
and effective bridge maintenance and painting of the vertical lift span
of the drawbridge, while providing for the reasonable needs of
navigation. Multiple work platforms will reduce the entire bridge span
vertical clearance to approximately 58 feet above mean high water in
the closed position and approximately 132 feet above mean high water in
the open position. Maintenance personnel, equipment and materials will
be located inside the work platforms while maintenance and painting is
being performed. To facilitate an opening of the bridge, equipment and
materials will need to be secured inside or removed from the work
platforms and personnel will need to vacate the work platforms.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that
vessels can still transit the bridge on signal if at least a two-hour
notice is given.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this proposed rule would not have
a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review,
under figure 2-1, paragraph (32) (e), of the Instruction.
A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a
Memorandum for the Record are not required for this proposed rule. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
[[Page 6994]]
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received
without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or
vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.716 by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.716 Delaware River.
* * * * *
(c) The draw of the SR 413 (Burlington-Bristol) Bridge, mile 117.8,
between Burlington, NJ and Bristol, PA, shall open on signal if at
least a two-hour notice is given from 8 a.m. on February 15, 2019,
through 7:59 a.m. on September 17, 2019.
Dated: February 13, 2019.
K.M. Smith,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-03715 Filed 2-28-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P