New Hampshire: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 7010-7015 [2019-03590]

Download as PDF 7010 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules primary or secondary forms of identification. * * * * * Ruth B. Stevenson, Attorney, Federal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–03712 Filed 2–28–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 271 [EPA–R01–RCRA–2018–0431; FRL–9990– 16–Region 1] New Hampshire: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS AGENCY: SUMMARY: The state of New Hampshire has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for final authorization of changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended. EPA has reviewed New Hampshire’s application and has determined that these changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for final authorization. Therefore, we are proposing to authorize the State’s changes. EPA seeks public comment prior to taking final action. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 1, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Email: Stephen Yee—yee.steve@ epa.gov. • Fax: (617) 918–0197. • Mail: Stephen Yee, RCRA Waste Management & UST Section, Office of Site Remediation & Restoration, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail Code: OSRR07–01), Boston, MA 02109–3912. • Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: Stephen Yee, RCRA Waste Management & UST Section, Office of Site Remediation & Restoration, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail Code: OSRR07– 01), Boston, MA 02109–3912. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA–R01–RCRA– VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 2018–0431. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov, or email. The federal www.regulations.gov website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. (For additional information about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm). Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy. You can view and copy New Hampshire’s application and associated publicly available materials from 9:00 a.m. to Noon and 12:30 to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, at the EPA Region 1 Library, 5 Post Office Square, 1st floor, Boston, MA 02109–3912; by appointment; Tel: (617) 918–1990 or from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday at the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Public Information Center, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03301; Tel: (603) 271–2919 or 271–8876. Interested persons wanting to examine these PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 documents should make an appointment with either the EPA Library or the NHDES Public Information Center to facilitate access to the documents. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Yee, RCRA Waste Management & UST Section, Office of Site Remediation & Restoration, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail Code: OSRR07–01), Boston, MA 02109– 3912, Tel: (617) 918–1197; Fax: (617) 918–0197, email: yee.steve@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary? States that have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the federal program. As the federal program changes, states must change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to state programs may be necessary when federal or state statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur. Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279. New federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by federal regulations that EPA promulgates pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) take effect in authorized states at the same time that they take effect in unauthorized states. Thus, EPA will implement those requirements and prohibitions in New Hampshire, including the issuance of new permits implementing those requirements, until the State is granted authorization to do so. B. What decisions has EPA made in this rule? On September 10, 2018, New Hampshire submitted a complete program revision application seeking authorization of changes to its hazardous waste program that correspond to certain federal rules promulgated between July 1, 1986 and June 30, 2014 (also known as NonHSWA, HSWA, and RCRA Clusters). EPA concludes that New Hampshire’s application to revise its authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements established under RCRA, as set forth in RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR part 271. Therefore, EPA E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS proposes to grant New Hampshire final authorization to operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in the authorization application, and as outlined below in Sections F and G of this document. New Hampshire has responsibility for permitting treatment, storage, and disposal facilities within its borders and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject to the limitations of HSWA, as discussed above. 56397); and February 27, 2006, effective March 29, 2006 (71 FR 9727). F. What changes are we proposing with today’s action? On September 10, 2018, the State of New Hampshire submitted a final complete program revision application, seeking authorization of changes to its hazardous waste management program in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. EPA proposes to determine, subject to receipt of written comments that oppose this action, that New Hampshire’s hazardous waste program revisions are equivalent C. What is the effect of this proposed to, consistent with, and no less stringent authorization decision? than the federal program, and therefore satisfy all of the requirements necessary If New Hampshire is authorized for to qualify for final authorization. EPA is the changes described in New proposing to authorize New Hampshire Hampshire’s authorization application, for the following program changes: these changes will become part of the New Hampshire is seeking authorized State hazardous waste authorization for updated state program and will therefore be federally regulations addressing most federal enforceable. New Hampshire will requirements through June 30, 2014 and continue to have primary enforcement authority and responsibility for its State also for changes to New Hampshire’s base program for which they had been hazardous waste program. EPA would previously authorized. Significant maintain its authorities under RCRA program revisions in this package sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, include the Land Disposal Restrictions including its authority to: and hazardous waste listings. We are • Conduct inspections, and require proposing to authorize the program monitoring, tests, analyses or reports; changes as provided in each of the • Enforce RCRA requirements, following Revision Checklists (RC): including authorized State program RC 13—Definition of Solid Waste for 40 requirements, and suspend or revoke CFR 260.30—260.33 only; permits; and • Take enforcement actions regardless RC 81—Petroleum Refinery Primary and Secondary Oil/Water/Solids of whether the State has taken its own Separation Sludge Listings (F037 and actions F038); This action will not impose additional RC 89—Revision to the Petroleum requirements on the regulated Refining Primary and Secondary Oil/ community because the regulations Water/Solids Separation Sludge which EPA is proposing to authorize in Listings (F037 and F038); (RC 91)— New Hampshire are already effective Administrative Stay for F032, F034, and are not changed by today’s and F035 Listing (HSWA/Non HSWA) proposed action. (Superseded by 57 FR 5859 and 57 FR D. What happens if EPA receives 61492, see RCs 101 and 120 in RCRA comments that oppose this action? Clusters II and III, respectively); RC 101—Administrative Stay for the If EPA receives comments on this Requirement That Existing Drip Pads proposed action, we will address all be Impermeable (HSWA/Non HSWA) such comments in a later final rule. You (Superseded by 57 FR 61492, see RC may not have another opportunity to 120 in RCRA Cluster III); comment. If you want to comment on RC 117A—Reissuance of the ‘‘Mixture’’ this authorization, you should do so at and ‘‘Derived-From’’ Rules; this time. RC 135—Recovered Oil Exclusion; E. What has New Hampshire previously RC 140—Carbamate Production been authorized for? Identification and Listing of HW; RC 150—Amendments to the Definition The State of New Hampshire initially of Solid Waste; Amendment II; received final authorization on RC 152—Imports and Exports of HW: December 18, 1984, effective January 3, Implementation of OECD Council 1985 (49 FR 49093) to implement the Decision; RCRA hazardous waste management RC 156—Military Munitions Rule: HW program. EPA granted authorization for Identification and Management; changes to New Hampshire’s program Explosives Emergencies; Manifest on the following dates: November 14, Exemption for Transport of HW on 1994, effective January 13, 1995 (59 FR VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 7011 Right-of-Ways on Contiguous Properties; RC 159—Conformance with the Carbamate Vacatur; RC 169—Petroleum Refining Process Wastes; RC 178—Petroleum Refining Process Wastes—Leachate Exemption; RC 183—Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Technical Corrections; RC 187—Petroleum Refining Process Wastes—Clarification; RC 189—Chlorinated Aliphatics Listing and LDRs for Newly Identified Wastes; RC 192A—Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revisions; RC 194—Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revision II; RC 195—Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing Wastes Identification and Listing; RC 206—Nonwastewaters from Dyes and Pigments; RC 207—Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest Rule; RC 218—F019 Exemption for Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Auto Manufacturing Zinc Phosphating Processes; RC 222—OECD Requirements; Export Shipments of Spend Lead-Acid Batteries; RC 225—Removal of Saccharin and Its Salts from the Lists of Hazardous Constituents—There is no checklist for this rule because it removes provisions from the regulations.; RC 227—Revision of the Land Disposal Treatment Standards for Carbamate Wastes; RC 229—Conditional Exclusions for Solvent Contaminated Wipes; Special Consolidated Checklist for the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) as of 6/30/92 includes the following checklists: • RC 34—Land Disposal Restrictions; • RC 39—California List Waste Restrictions; • RC 50—Land Disposal Restrictions for First Third Scheduled Wastes; • RC 62—Land Disposal Restrictions Amendments to First Third Scheduled Wastes; • RC 63—Land Disposal Restrictions for Second Third Scheduled Wastes; • RC 66—Land Disposal Restrictions; Correction to the First Third Scheduled Wastes; • RC 78H—Land Disposal Restrictions for Third Third Scheduled Wastes; • RC 78N—Land Disposal Restrictions for Third Third Scheduled Wastes; • RC 83—Land Disposal Restrictions for Third Third Scheduled Wastes; Technical Amendments; • RC 95—Land Disposal Restrictions for Electric Arc Furnace Dust; E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1 7012 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS • RC 102—Second Correction to the Third Third Land Disposal Restrictions; • RC 103—Hazardous Debris Case-byCase Capacity Variance; • RC 106—Lead-bearing Hazardous Materials Case-by-Case Capacity Variance; Hazardous Wastes from Carbamate Production; • RC 172—Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Extension of Compliance Date for Characteristic Slags; • RC 173—Land Disposal Restrictions; Treatment Standards for Spent Potliners from Primary Aluminum Reduction (K088); Final Rule; Special Consolidated Checklist for the • RC 178—Petroleum Refining Process Phases I–IV LDRs as of 12/31/02 Wastes—Leachate Exemption; includes the following checklists: • RC 183—Land Disposal Restrictions • RC 109—Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Technical Corrections; for Newly Listed Wastes and • RC 189—Chlorinated Aliphatics Hazardous Debris; Listing and LDRs for Newly Identified • RC 116—Hazardous Soil Case-By-Case Wastes; Capacity Variance; • RC 190—Land Disposal Restrictions • RC 117A—Reissuance of the Phase IV—Deferral for PCBs in Soil; ‘‘Mixture’’ and ‘‘Derived-From’’ Rules; • RC 195—Inorganic Chemical • RC 123—Land Disposal Restrictions; Manufacturing Wastes Identification Renewal of the Hazardous Waste and Listing; Debris Case-by-Case Capacity • RC 201—Treatment Variance for Variance; Radioactively Contaminated Batteries; • RC 124—Land Disposal Restrictions Checklist for the Wood Preserving for Ignitable and Corrosive Listings as of 12/31/02 includes the Characteristic Wastes Whose following checklists: Treatment Standards Were Vacated; • RC 92—Wood Preserving Listings; • RC 136—Removal of the Conditional Technical Corrections; Exemption for Certain Slag Residues; • RC 120—Wood Preserving; Revisions • RC 137—Universal Treatment to Listings and Technical Standards and Treatment Standards Requirements; for Organic Toxicity Characteristic • RC 162—Clarification of Standards for Wastes and Newly Listed Wastes; Hazardous Waste LDR Treatment • RC 151—Land Disposal Restrictions Variances; Phase III—Decharacterized • RC 167F—Exclusion of Recycled Wastewaters, Carbamate Wastes, and Wood Preserving Wastewaters. Spent Potliners; A detailed cross walk for each of the • RC 155—Land Disposal Restrictions checklists mentioned above can be Phase III—Emergency Extension of found in the administrative record for the K088 Capacity Variance; this Federal Register authorization. • RC 157—Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Treatment Standards for G. Where are the revised State rules Wood Preserving Wastes, Paperwork different from the Federal rules? Reduction and Streamlining, When revised state rules differ from Exemptions From RCRA for Certain the Federal rules in the RCRA state Processed Materials; and authorization process, EPA determines Miscellaneous Hazardous Waste whether the state rules are equivalent to, Provisions; more stringent than, or broader in scope • RC 160—Land Disposal Restrictions than the federal program. Pursuant to Phase III—Emergency Extension of the K088 National Capacity Variance, Section 3009 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6929, state programs may contain Amendment; requirements that are more stringent • RC 161—Emergency Revision of the Carbamate Land Disposal Restrictions; than the federal regulations. Such more • RC 167A—Land Disposal Restrictions stringent requirements can be federally authorized and, once authorized, Phase IV—Treatment Standards for become federally enforceable. Although Metal Wastes and Mineral Processing the statute does not prevent states from Wastes; • RC 167B—Land Disposal Restrictions adopting regulations that are broader in Phase IV—Hazardous Soils Treatment scope than the federal program, states cannot receive federal authorization for Standards and Exclusions; • RC 167C—Land Disposal Restrictions such regulations, and they are not federally enforceable. Phase IV– Corrections; The most significant differences • RC 170—Land Disposal Restrictions between the New Hampshire rules and Phase IV—Zinc Micronutrient the federal rules are highlighted and Fertilizers, Amendment; • RC 171—Emergency Revision of the summarized in the Table 1 below. It Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) should be noted that this summary does Treatment Standards for Listed not describe every difference, nor every VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 detail regarding the differences that are described. Members of the regulated community are advised to read the complete regulations to ensure that they understand their compliance responsibilities. 1. More Stringent Provisions There are aspects of the New Hampshire program which are more stringent than the federal program. These requirements would become part of New Hampshire’s authorized program and would be federal enforceable. All of these more stringent requirements are, or will become, part of the federally enforceable RCRA program when authorized by the EPA and must be complied with in addition to the State requirements which track the minimum Federal requirements. These more stringent requirements are identified as MS in the Table 1 below. 2. Broader-In-Scope Provisions There are aspects of the New Hampshire program that are broader-inscope than the federal program. These broader-in-scope requirements do not become part of the authorized program and EPA cannot enforce them. Regulated entities must comply with these requirements in accordance with State law. These broader-in-scope requirements are identified as BIS in the Table 1 below. 3. Partially Broader-In-Scope There are aspects of the New Hampshire program that are partially broader-in-scope than the federal program. These partially broader-inscope requirements are the result of New Hampshire not adopting certain portions of the regulations. These partially broader-in-scope requirements are not part of the authorized program and EPA cannot enforce them. However, the parts of the regulations which are not partially broader-in-scope are part of the federally enforceable RCRA program. Regulated entities must comply with these requirements in accordance with State law. These broader-in-scope requirements are identified as Partially BIS in the Table 1 below. 4. Different but Equivalent Provisions New Hampshire also has some regulations that differ from, but have been determined to be equivalent to, the federal regulations. These state regulations will become part of the federally enforceable RCRA program when authorized by the EPA. These different but equivalent requirements are identified as EQ in the Table 1 below. 5. There are certain federal requirements that EPA cannot delegate to the States, although New Hampshire has adopted these requirements by E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules reference, EPA would continue to implement those requirements. These 7013 requirements are identified in the Table 1 below. TABLE 1 Description of checklist number and the Federal requirement Analogous state authority 1—(Env–Hw) RC 117A—Reissuance of the ‘‘Mixture’’ and ‘‘Derived-From’’ Rules 261.3(a)(2)(i) ........................ 261.3(a)(2)(iv) ....................... 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A)–(E) ........... 261.3(b)(2) ............................ 261.3(b)(3) ............................ 261.3(c)(2)(i) ......................... 261.3(c)(2)(ii)(B) ................... 401.01(b)(3)—NH’s mixture rule regulates as characteristic wastes mixtures of hazardous wastes with materials that are not solid wastes (e.g., soils) if the mixture exhibits a characteristic. (Partially BIS). 401.01(b)(2); 401.01(c)(2)—NH’s mixture rule regulates as listed wastes mixtures of hazardous wastes with materials that are not solid wastes (e.g., soils). (Partially BIS). NH is not adopting an analog to these provisions. (BIS). 401.01(b)(2); 404.02—NH’s mixture rule regulates as listed wastes mixtures of hazardous wastes with materials that are not solid wastes (e.g., soils). (Partially BIS). 401.01(b)(3)—NH’s mixture rule regulates as characteristic wastes mixtures of hazardous wastes with materials that are not solid wastes (e.g., soils) if the mixture exhibits a characteristic. (Partially BIS). 401.01(c)(2), 404.03(a), 404.03(b)—NH includes precipitation run-off that exhibits a characteristic. (Partially BIS). 401.03(b)(30)—NH has adopted the exemption for fuels produced from the refining of oil-bearing HW (now at 40 CFR 261.6(a)(3)(iii)) but has not adopted the other exemptions. (Partially BIS). RC 135—Recovered Oil Exclusion 261.3(c)(2)(ii)(B) ................... 261.6(a)(3)(v), now at 261.6(a)(3)(iv). 261.6(a)(3)(vi) ....................... 401.03(b)(30)—NH has adopted the exemption for fuels produced from the refining of oil-bearing HW (now at 40 CFR 261.6(a)(3)(iii)) but has not adopted the other exemptions. (Partially BIS). NH is not adopting these provisions. (BIS). An analog to this provision does not currently exist in NH rules, and this provision was subsequently deleted in RC169. RC 140—Carbamate Production Identification and Listing of HW 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(E)–(G) ........... NH is not adopting these exemptions. (BIS). RC 169—Petroleum Refining Process Wastes 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(C) .................. 261.3(c)(2)(ii)(B) ................... 261.6(a)(3)(iv)(C) .................. N/A—NH is not adopting the exemption. (BIS). 401.03(b)(30)—NH has adopted the exemption for fuels produced from the refining of oil-bearing HW (40 CFR 261.6(a)(3)(iii)) but has not adopted the other exemptions. (Partially BIS). NH is not adopting this provision. (BIS). RC 192A—Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revisions 261.3(a)(2)(iv) ....................... 261.3(c)(2)(i) ......................... 261.3(h)(1)–(3) ..................... 401.01(b)(2); 401.01(c)(2)—NH’s mixture rule regulates as listed wastes mixtures of hazardous wastes with materials that are not solid wastes (e.g., soils). NH has not yet adopted RC191. (Partially BIS). 401.01(c)(2); 404.03(a); 404.03(b)—NH includes precipitation run-off that exhibits a characteristic. NH has not yet adopted RC191. (Partially BIS). NH has not yet adopted RC191. (BIS). RC 194—Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revision II 261.3(a)(2)(iv) ....................... 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A)–(G) ........... 401.01(b)(2), 401.01(c)(2)—NH’s mixture rule regulates as listed wastes mixtures of hazardous wastes with materials that are not solid wastes (e.g.,, soils). NH has not yet adopted CL191. (Partially BIS). NH is not adopting these exemptions. (BIS). RC 207—Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest Rule 262.27(a) .............................. 262.27(b) .............................. 262.34(m) ............................. 510.01(e)—NH requires generators of ≥100 kgs./month to certify. (MS). 510.01(f)—NH requires generators of <100 kgs./month to certify. (MS). 511.02(b)(3); 507.03(a) and (b)—NH does not allow accumulation as provided in 40 CFR 262.34(d)–(f). (MS). jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS RC 229—Conditional Exclusions for Solvent Contaminated Wipes 260.10 ‘‘Solvent-contaminated wipe’’. 261.4(a)(26)(i) ...................... 261.4(b)(18)(i) ...................... 261.4(b)(18)(vi)(A) ................ VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 28, 2019 401.02(d) and (e)—Used oil is a listed waste in NH. NH’s definition allows wipes to contain used oil. (EQ) Wipes used to clean up solvent spills of 12 fluid ounces or more are not eligible for the exemption. (BIS). 401.03(g)(3)–(7)—NH has added a clarifying requirement at (g)(1) that excess spent solvent can’t be added to wipes to avoid disposal. (EQ). 401.03(g)(3)–(7)—NH has added a clarifying requirement at (g)(1) that excess spent solvent can’t be added to wipes to avoid disposal. (EQ). 401.03(b)(28)c.3—NH prohibits disposal in NH MSW landfills. (BIS). Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1 7014 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1—Continued Description of checklist number and the Federal requirement Analogous state authority 1—(Env–Hw) Special Consolidated Checklist for the Land Disposal Restrictions as of June 30, 1992 261.5(b)—(RC 34) ................ 261.5(f)(2); 261.5(g)(2)—(RC 34). 262.34(d)(4)—(RC 83) ......... 263.12—(RC 34) .................. 268.1(c)(3)—(RCs 34, 39, 50, 66, 78); 268.1(c)(3)(i)– (ii)—(RC 78). 268.3(b)—(RCs 78, 102) ...... 268.5(a)–(i)—(RC 34) .......... 268.6(a)–(n)—(RC 34) ......... 268.7(a)(10)—(RCs 78, 83) 268.42(b)—(RCs 34, 39, 78) 268.44(a)–(g)—(RC 34) ....... 503.01, 508, 1201.03(b)—NH has not adopted the very small quantity generator (VSQG) exclusion but does exempt VSQGs from LDR requirements. (MS). 503.01, 508—NH has not adopted the VSQG exclusion. (MS). 507.03(a)—NH rules allow generators of between 100 and 1000 kgs./month to accumulate up to 90 days rather than 180. (MS). 104.63; 304.11; 601.01(b)(2) and (3); 701.01(a)—NH requires a permit for transfer facilities. (MS). 1202.02(b)(1)—NH prohibits underground injection of HW. (MS) 1202.02(f), NH has not adopted an analog to this provision. (MS). N/A—These federal regulations are not being incorporated by reference, since EPA; 102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1). N/A—These federal regulations are not being incorporated by reference, since EPA; 102.02(a); 1202.02(a)(1). 509.05; 1202.02(i)—NH has not adopted an analog to this provision. (MS). N/A—These federal regulations are not being incorporated by reference, since EPA; 102.02(a); 1202.02(a)(1). N/A—These federal regulations are not being incorporated by reference, since EPA; 102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1). the authority is being retained by the authority is being retained by the authority is being retained by the authority is being retained by Special Consolidated Checklist for the Phases I–IV Land Disposal Restrictions as of December 31, 2002 262.34(d)(4)—(RC 179) ....... 264.1(g)(6)—(RCs 124, 137) 265.1(c)(10)—(RCs 124, 137). 268.1(c)(3)(i)–(ii)—(RC 151) 268.3(b)—(RC 151) .............. 268.5(h)(2)(ii)–(vi)—(RC 109) 268.7(a)(7)—(RCs 137, 157, 167C). 268.42(b)—(RC 109) ............ 268.44(a)(1)–(2)—(RC 162) 507.03(a)—NH rules allow generators of between 100 and 1000 kgs./month to accumulate up to 90 days rather than 180 (MS). 404.01; 701.02(a)(4)—NH rules do not include language specifically allowing dilution of D001 and D003 wastes in ENUs and WWTUs. (MS). 404.01, 701.02(a)(4)—NH rules do not include language specifically allowing dilution of D001 and D003 wastes in ENUs and WWTUs. (MS). 1202.02(b)(1)—NH prohibits underground injection of HW. (MS). 1202.02(f)—NH has not adopted an analog to this provision. (MS). N/A—These federal regulations are not being incorporated by reference, since the authority is being retained by EPA; 102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1). 509.05; 1202.01 incorporates 40 CFR 268 by reference; 1202.02(b)(2)—NH prohibits underground injection of HW. (MS). N/A—These federal regulations are not being incorporated by reference, since the authority is being retained by EPA; 102.02(a); 1202.02(a)(1). N/A—These federal regulations are not being incorporated by reference, since the authority is being retained by EPA; 102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1). Special Consolidated Checklist for the Wood Preserving Listings as of December 31, 2002 262.34(a)(1)(i)—(RC 92) ...... 262.34(a)(1)(ii)—(RC 92) ..... 1 State 507.01(a)—(EQ); 507.02(a)—(EQ); 509.02(a)(6)—(EQ); 507.02(b)–(f)—NH requires storage on impervious surfaces; secondary containment if wastes with free liquids are stored near floor drains, manholes, or sinks; and for containers stored outside, protection from precipitation, secondary containment, and setbacks from wells and storm drains (MS); 509.03(b), (e), (g) and (i)—For satellite storage NH requires: Training, appropriate management of incompatible wastes, and inspections. (MS). 507.01(a); 507.02(a)—(EQ); 507.03(a)—(EQ); 509.02(a)(7)—(EQ); 508.03(d)—NH requires federal VSQGs that accumulate ≥100 kg of HW in tanks to comply with portions of Subpart J. (MS). of New Hampshire’s Hazardous Waste Rules, effective August 14, 2017. jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS H. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect? When the final authorization takes effect, New Hampshire will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue to administer and enforce any RCRA and HSWA (Hazardous and Solid Waste Act) permits or portions of permits that it has issued in New Hampshire prior to the effective date of this authorization until the State incorporates the terms and VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 conditions of the federal permits into the State RCRA permits. EPA will not issue any new permits, or new portions of permits, for the provisions listed in the Table above after the effective date of this authorization. EPA will continue to implement and issue permits for any HSWA requirements for which New Hampshire is not yet authorized. EPA has the authority to enforce state-issued permits after the State is authorized. PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 I. What is codification and is EPA codifying New Hampshire’s hazardous waste program as authorized in this rule? Codification is the process of placing citations and references to the State’s statutes and regulations that comprise the State’s authorized hazardous waste program into the Code of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by adding these citations and references to the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. EPA is not proposing to codify the E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2019 / Proposed Rules authorization of New Hampshire’s changes at this time. However, EPA reserves the ability to amend 40 CFR part 272, subpart EE for this authorization of New Hampshire’s program changes at a later date. jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS J. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action proposes to authorize State requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory action because actions such as today’s proposed authorization of New Hampshire’s revised hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action proposes to authorize preexisting requirements under State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531– 1538). For the same reason, this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely proposes to authorize State requirements as part of the State RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and it does not make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA grants a state’s application for authorization as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a state authorization application, to require the use of any particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in proposing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of this action in accordance with the ‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under the executive PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 7015 order. This action does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). ‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. Because this action proposes authorization of pre-existing State rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less stringent than existing federal requirements, and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law, and there are no anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects, this proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b). Dated: January 29, 2019. Deborah A. Szaro, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1. [FR Doc. 2019–03590 Filed 2–28–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7010-7015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03590]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R01-RCRA-2018-0431; FRL-9990-16-Region 1]


New Hampshire: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The state of New Hampshire has applied to the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) for final authorization of changes to its 
hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery 
Act (RCRA), as amended. EPA has reviewed New Hampshire's application 
and has determined that these changes satisfy all requirements needed 
to qualify for final authorization. Therefore, we are proposing to 
authorize the State's changes. EPA seeks public comment prior to taking 
final action.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 1, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: Stephen Yee_yee.steve@epa.gov.
     Fax: (617) 918-0197.
     Mail: Stephen Yee, RCRA Waste Management & UST Section, 
Office of Site Remediation & Restoration, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office 
Square, Suite 100 (Mail Code: OSRR07-01), Boston, MA 02109-3912.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: 
Stephen Yee, RCRA Waste Management & UST Section, Office of Site 
Remediation & Restoration, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 
100 (Mail Code: OSRR07-01), Boston, MA 02109-3912. Such deliveries are 
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA-R01-
RCRA-2018-0431. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be 
included in the public docket without change and may be made available 
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov, 
or email. The federal www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous 
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact 
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you 
send an email comment directly to EPA without going through 
www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured 
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket 
and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic 
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact 
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you 
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties 
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to 
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special 
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or 
viruses. (For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit 
the EPA Docket Center homepage at www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm).
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the 
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
in www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy.
    You can view and copy New Hampshire's application and associated 
publicly available materials from 9:00 a.m. to Noon and 12:30 to 3:30 
p.m., Monday through Thursday, at the EPA Region 1 Library, 5 Post 
Office Square, 1st floor, Boston, MA 02109-3912; by appointment; Tel: 
(617) 918-1990 or from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday at 
the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Public 
Information Center, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03301; Tel: (603) 271-
2919 or 271-8876. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents 
should make an appointment with either the EPA Library or the NHDES 
Public Information Center to facilitate access to the documents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Yee, RCRA Waste Management & 
UST Section, Office of Site Remediation & Restoration, EPA Region 1, 5 
Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail Code: OSRR07-01), Boston, MA 02109-
3912, Tel: (617) 918-1197; Fax: (617) 918-0197, email: 
yee.steve@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?

    States that have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA 
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste 
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent 
than the federal program. As the federal program changes, states must 
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to 
state programs may be necessary when federal or state statutory or 
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur. 
Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to 
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
    New federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by federal 
regulations that EPA promulgates pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) take effect in authorized states at the 
same time that they take effect in unauthorized states. Thus, EPA will 
implement those requirements and prohibitions in New Hampshire, 
including the issuance of new permits implementing those requirements, 
until the State is granted authorization to do so.

B. What decisions has EPA made in this rule?

    On September 10, 2018, New Hampshire submitted a complete program 
revision application seeking authorization of changes to its hazardous 
waste program that correspond to certain federal rules promulgated 
between July 1, 1986 and June 30, 2014 (also known as Non-HSWA, HSWA, 
and RCRA Clusters). EPA concludes that New Hampshire's application to 
revise its authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory 
requirements established under RCRA, as set forth in RCRA section 
3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR part 271. Therefore, EPA

[[Page 7011]]

proposes to grant New Hampshire final authorization to operate its 
hazardous waste program with the changes described in the authorization 
application, and as outlined below in Sections F and G of this 
document.
    New Hampshire has responsibility for permitting treatment, storage, 
and disposal facilities within its borders and for carrying out the 
aspects of the RCRA program described in its revised program 
application, subject to the limitations of HSWA, as discussed above.

C. What is the effect of this proposed authorization decision?

    If New Hampshire is authorized for the changes described in New 
Hampshire's authorization application, these changes will become part 
of the authorized State hazardous waste program and will therefore be 
federally enforceable. New Hampshire will continue to have primary 
enforcement authority and responsibility for its State hazardous waste 
program. EPA would maintain its authorities under RCRA sections 3007, 
3008, 3013, and 7003, including its authority to:
     Conduct inspections, and require monitoring, tests, 
analyses or reports;
     Enforce RCRA requirements, including authorized State 
program requirements, and suspend or revoke permits; and
     Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State 
has taken its own actions
    This action will not impose additional requirements on the 
regulated community because the regulations which EPA is proposing to 
authorize in New Hampshire are already effective and are not changed by 
today's proposed action.

D. What happens if EPA receives comments that oppose this action?

    If EPA receives comments on this proposed action, we will address 
all such comments in a later final rule. You may not have another 
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this authorization, 
you should do so at this time.

E. What has New Hampshire previously been authorized for?

    The State of New Hampshire initially received final authorization 
on December 18, 1984, effective January 3, 1985 (49 FR 49093) to 
implement the RCRA hazardous waste management program. EPA granted 
authorization for changes to New Hampshire's program on the following 
dates: November 14, 1994, effective January 13, 1995 (59 FR 56397); and 
February 27, 2006, effective March 29, 2006 (71 FR 9727).

F. What changes are we proposing with today's action?

    On September 10, 2018, the State of New Hampshire submitted a final 
complete program revision application, seeking authorization of changes 
to its hazardous waste management program in accordance with 40 CFR 
271.21. EPA proposes to determine, subject to receipt of written 
comments that oppose this action, that New Hampshire's hazardous waste 
program revisions are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less 
stringent than the federal program, and therefore satisfy all of the 
requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. EPA is 
proposing to authorize New Hampshire for the following program changes:
    New Hampshire is seeking authorization for updated state 
regulations addressing most federal requirements through June 30, 2014 
and also for changes to New Hampshire's base program for which they had 
been previously authorized. Significant program revisions in this 
package include the Land Disposal Restrictions and hazardous waste 
listings. We are proposing to authorize the program changes as provided 
in each of the following Revision Checklists (RC):

RC 13--Definition of Solid Waste for 40 CFR 260.30--260.33 only;
RC 81--Petroleum Refinery Primary and Secondary Oil/Water/Solids 
Separation Sludge Listings (F037 and F038);
RC 89--Revision to the Petroleum Refining Primary and Secondary Oil/
Water/Solids Separation Sludge Listings (F037 and F038); (RC 91)--
Administrative Stay for F032, F034, and F035 Listing (HSWA/Non HSWA) 
(Superseded by 57 FR 5859 and 57 FR 61492, see RCs 101 and 120 in RCRA 
Clusters II and III, respectively);
RC 101--Administrative Stay for the Requirement That Existing Drip Pads 
be Impermeable (HSWA/Non HSWA) (Superseded by 57 FR 61492, see RC 120 
in RCRA Cluster III);
RC 117A--Reissuance of the ``Mixture'' and ``Derived-From'' Rules;
RC 135--Recovered Oil Exclusion;
RC 140--Carbamate Production Identification and Listing of HW;
RC 150--Amendments to the Definition of Solid Waste; Amendment II;
RC 152--Imports and Exports of HW: Implementation of OECD Council 
Decision;
RC 156--Military Munitions Rule: HW Identification and Management; 
Explosives Emergencies; Manifest Exemption for Transport of HW on 
Right-of-Ways on Contiguous Properties;
RC 159--Conformance with the Carbamate Vacatur;
RC 169--Petroleum Refining Process Wastes;
RC 178--Petroleum Refining Process Wastes--Leachate Exemption;
RC 183--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Technical Corrections;
RC 187--Petroleum Refining Process Wastes--Clarification;
RC 189--Chlorinated Aliphatics Listing and LDRs for Newly Identified 
Wastes;
RC 192A--Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revisions;
RC 194--Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revision II;
RC 195--Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing Wastes Identification and 
Listing;
RC 206--Nonwastewaters from Dyes and Pigments;
RC 207--Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest Rule;
RC 218--F019 Exemption for Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Auto 
Manufacturing Zinc Phosphating Processes;
RC 222--OECD Requirements; Export Shipments of Spend Lead-Acid 
Batteries;
RC 225--Removal of Saccharin and Its Salts from the Lists of Hazardous 
Constituents--There is no checklist for this rule because it removes 
provisions from the regulations.;
RC 227--Revision of the Land Disposal Treatment Standards for Carbamate 
Wastes;
RC 229--Conditional Exclusions for Solvent Contaminated Wipes;

    Special Consolidated Checklist for the Land Disposal Restrictions 
(LDRs) as of 6/30/92 includes the following checklists:

 RC 34--Land Disposal Restrictions;
 RC 39--California List Waste Restrictions;
 RC 50--Land Disposal Restrictions for First Third Scheduled 
Wastes;
 RC 62--Land Disposal Restrictions Amendments to First Third 
Scheduled Wastes;
 RC 63--Land Disposal Restrictions for Second Third Scheduled 
Wastes;
 RC 66--Land Disposal Restrictions; Correction to the First 
Third Scheduled Wastes;
 RC 78H--Land Disposal Restrictions for Third Third Scheduled 
Wastes;
 RC 78N--Land Disposal Restrictions for Third Third Scheduled 
Wastes;
 RC 83--Land Disposal Restrictions for Third Third Scheduled 
Wastes; Technical Amendments;
 RC 95--Land Disposal Restrictions for Electric Arc Furnace 
Dust;

[[Page 7012]]

 RC 102--Second Correction to the Third Third Land Disposal 
Restrictions;
 RC 103--Hazardous Debris Case-by-Case Capacity Variance;
 RC 106--Lead-bearing Hazardous Materials Case-by-Case Capacity 
Variance;

    Special Consolidated Checklist for the Phases I-IV LDRs as of 12/
31/02 includes the following checklists:

 RC 109--Land Disposal Restrictions for Newly Listed Wastes and 
Hazardous Debris;
 RC 116--Hazardous Soil Case-By-Case Capacity Variance;
 RC 117A--Reissuance of the ``Mixture'' and ``Derived-From'' 
Rules;
 RC 123--Land Disposal Restrictions; Renewal of the Hazardous 
Waste Debris Case-by-Case Capacity Variance;
 RC 124--Land Disposal Restrictions for Ignitable and Corrosive 
Characteristic Wastes Whose Treatment Standards Were Vacated;
 RC 136--Removal of the Conditional Exemption for Certain Slag 
Residues;
 RC 137--Universal Treatment Standards and Treatment Standards 
for Organic Toxicity Characteristic Wastes and Newly Listed Wastes;
 RC 151--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III--Decharacterized 
Wastewaters, Carbamate Wastes, and Spent Potliners;
 RC 155--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III--Emergency 
Extension of the K088 Capacity Variance;
 RC 157--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Treatment 
Standards for Wood Preserving Wastes, Paperwork Reduction and 
Streamlining, Exemptions From RCRA for Certain Processed Materials; and 
Miscellaneous Hazardous Waste Provisions;
 RC 160--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III--Emergency 
Extension of the K088 National Capacity Variance, Amendment;
 RC 161--Emergency Revision of the Carbamate Land Disposal 
Restrictions;
 RC 167A--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Treatment 
Standards for Metal Wastes and Mineral Processing Wastes;
 RC 167B--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Hazardous Soils 
Treatment Standards and Exclusions;
 RC 167C--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV- Corrections;
 RC 170--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Zinc 
Micronutrient Fertilizers, Amendment;
 RC 171--Emergency Revision of the Land Disposal Restrictions 
(LDR) Treatment Standards for Listed Hazardous Wastes from Carbamate 
Production;
 RC 172--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Extension of 
Compliance Date for Characteristic Slags;
 RC 173--Land Disposal Restrictions; Treatment Standards for 
Spent Potliners from Primary Aluminum Reduction (K088); Final Rule;
 RC 178--Petroleum Refining Process Wastes--Leachate Exemption;
 RC 183--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Technical 
Corrections;
 RC 189--Chlorinated Aliphatics Listing and LDRs for Newly 
Identified Wastes;
 RC 190--Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Deferral for PCBs 
in Soil;
 RC 195--Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing Wastes Identification 
and Listing;
 RC 201--Treatment Variance for Radioactively Contaminated 
Batteries;

    Checklist for the Wood Preserving Listings as of 12/31/02 includes 
the following checklists:

 RC 92--Wood Preserving Listings; Technical Corrections;
 RC 120--Wood Preserving; Revisions to Listings and Technical 
Requirements;
 RC 162--Clarification of Standards for Hazardous Waste LDR 
Treatment Variances;
 RC 167F--Exclusion of Recycled Wood Preserving Wastewaters.

A detailed cross walk for each of the checklists mentioned above can be 
found in the administrative record for this Federal Register 
authorization.

G. Where are the revised State rules different from the Federal rules?

    When revised state rules differ from the Federal rules in the RCRA 
state authorization process, EPA determines whether the state rules are 
equivalent to, more stringent than, or broader in scope than the 
federal program. Pursuant to Section 3009 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6929, 
state programs may contain requirements that are more stringent than 
the federal regulations. Such more stringent requirements can be 
federally authorized and, once authorized, become federally 
enforceable. Although the statute does not prevent states from adopting 
regulations that are broader in scope than the federal program, states 
cannot receive federal authorization for such regulations, and they are 
not federally enforceable.
    The most significant differences between the New Hampshire rules 
and the federal rules are highlighted and summarized in the Table 1 
below. It should be noted that this summary does not describe every 
difference, nor every detail regarding the differences that are 
described. Members of the regulated community are advised to read the 
complete regulations to ensure that they understand their compliance 
responsibilities.
    1. More Stringent Provisions
    There are aspects of the New Hampshire program which are more 
stringent than the federal program. These requirements would become 
part of New Hampshire's authorized program and would be federal 
enforceable. All of these more stringent requirements are, or will 
become, part of the federally enforceable RCRA program when authorized 
by the EPA and must be complied with in addition to the State 
requirements which track the minimum Federal requirements. These more 
stringent requirements are identified as MS in the Table 1 below.
    2. Broader-In-Scope Provisions
    There are aspects of the New Hampshire program that are broader-in-
scope than the federal program. These broader-in-scope requirements do 
not become part of the authorized program and EPA cannot enforce them. 
Regulated entities must comply with these requirements in accordance 
with State law. These broader-in-scope requirements are identified as 
BIS in the Table 1 below.
    3. Partially Broader-In-Scope
    There are aspects of the New Hampshire program that are partially 
broader-in-scope than the federal program. These partially broader-in-
scope requirements are the result of New Hampshire not adopting certain 
portions of the regulations. These partially broader-in-scope 
requirements are not part of the authorized program and EPA cannot 
enforce them. However, the parts of the regulations which are not 
partially broader-in-scope are part of the federally enforceable RCRA 
program. Regulated entities must comply with these requirements in 
accordance with State law. These broader-in-scope requirements are 
identified as Partially BIS in the Table 1 below.
    4. Different but Equivalent Provisions
    New Hampshire also has some regulations that differ from, but have 
been determined to be equivalent to, the federal regulations. These 
state regulations will become part of the federally enforceable RCRA 
program when authorized by the EPA. These different but equivalent 
requirements are identified as EQ in the Table 1 below.
    5. There are certain federal requirements that EPA cannot delegate 
to the States, although New Hampshire has adopted these requirements by

[[Page 7013]]

reference, EPA would continue to implement those requirements. These 
requirements are identified in the Table 1 below.

                                 Table 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Description of checklist
    number and the Federal      Analogous state authority \1\--(Env-Hw)
         requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    RC 117A--Reissuance of the ``Mixture'' and ``Derived-From'' Rules
------------------------------------------------------------------------
261.3(a)(2)(i)...............  401.01(b)(3)--NH's mixture rule regulates
                                as characteristic wastes mixtures of
                                hazardous wastes with materials that are
                                not solid wastes (e.g., soils) if the
                                mixture exhibits a characteristic.
                                (Partially BIS).
261.3(a)(2)(iv)..............  401.01(b)(2); 401.01(c)(2)--NH's mixture
                                rule regulates as listed wastes mixtures
                                of hazardous wastes with materials that
                                are not solid wastes (e.g., soils).
                                (Partially BIS).
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A)-(E).......  NH is not adopting an analog to these
                                provisions. (BIS).
261.3(b)(2)..................  401.01(b)(2); 404.02--NH's mixture rule
                                regulates as listed wastes mixtures of
                                hazardous wastes with materials that are
                                not solid wastes (e.g., soils).
                                (Partially BIS).
261.3(b)(3)..................  401.01(b)(3)--NH's mixture rule regulates
                                as characteristic wastes mixtures of
                                hazardous wastes with materials that are
                                not solid wastes (e.g., soils) if the
                                mixture exhibits a characteristic.
                                (Partially BIS).
261.3(c)(2)(i)...............  401.01(c)(2), 404.03(a), 404.03(b)--NH
                                includes precipitation run-off that
                                exhibits a characteristic. (Partially
                                BIS).
261.3(c)(2)(ii)(B)...........  401.03(b)(30)--NH has adopted the
                                exemption for fuels produced from the
                                refining of oil-bearing HW (now at 40
                                CFR 261.6(a)(3)(iii)) but has not
                                adopted the other exemptions. (Partially
                                BIS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     RC 135--Recovered Oil Exclusion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
261.3(c)(2)(ii)(B)...........  401.03(b)(30)--NH has adopted the
                                exemption for fuels produced from the
                                refining of oil-bearing HW (now at 40
                                CFR 261.6(a)(3)(iii)) but has not
                                adopted the other exemptions. (Partially
                                BIS).
261.6(a)(3)(v), now at         NH is not adopting these provisions.
 261.6(a)(3)(iv).               (BIS).
261.6(a)(3)(vi)..............  An analog to this provision does not
                                currently exist in NH rules, and this
                                provision was subsequently deleted in
                                RC169.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      RC 140--Carbamate Production Identification and Listing of HW
------------------------------------------------------------------------
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(E)-(G).......  NH is not adopting these exemptions.
                                (BIS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                RC 169--Petroleum Refining Process Wastes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(C)...........  N/A--NH is not adopting the exemption.
                                (BIS).
261.3(c)(2)(ii)(B)...........  401.03(b)(30)--NH has adopted the
                                exemption for fuels produced from the
                                refining of oil-bearing HW (40 CFR
                                261.6(a)(3)(iii)) but has not adopted
                                the other exemptions. (Partially BIS).
261.6(a)(3)(iv)(C)...........  NH is not adopting this provision. (BIS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            RC 192A--Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
261.3(a)(2)(iv)..............  401.01(b)(2); 401.01(c)(2)--NH's mixture
                                rule regulates as listed wastes mixtures
                                of hazardous wastes with materials that
                                are not solid wastes (e.g., soils). NH
                                has not yet adopted RC191. (Partially
                                BIS).
261.3(c)(2)(i)...............  401.01(c)(2); 404.03(a); 404.03(b)--NH
                                includes precipitation run-off that
                                exhibits a characteristic. NH has not
                                yet adopted RC191. (Partially BIS).
261.3(h)(1)-(3)..............  NH has not yet adopted RC191. (BIS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           RC 194--Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revision II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
261.3(a)(2)(iv)..............  401.01(b)(2), 401.01(c)(2)--NH's mixture
                                rule regulates as listed wastes mixtures
                                of hazardous wastes with materials that
                                are not solid wastes (e.g.,, soils). NH
                                has not yet adopted CL191. (Partially
                                BIS).
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A)-(G).......  NH is not adopting these exemptions.
                                (BIS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              RC 207--Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
262.27(a)....................  510.01(e)--NH requires generators of
                                >=100 kgs./month to certify. (MS).
262.27(b)....................  510.01(f)--NH requires generators of <100
                                kgs./month to certify. (MS).
262.34(m)....................  511.02(b)(3); 507.03(a) and (b)--NH does
                                not allow accumulation as provided in 40
                                CFR 262.34(d)-(f). (MS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      RC 229--Conditional Exclusions for Solvent Contaminated Wipes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
260.10 ``Solvent-contaminated  401.02(d) and (e)--Used oil is a listed
 wipe''.                        waste in NH. NH's definition allows
                                wipes to contain used oil. (EQ) Wipes
                                used to clean up solvent spills of 12
                                fluid ounces or more are not eligible
                                for the exemption. (BIS).
261.4(a)(26)(i)..............  401.03(g)(3)-(7)--NH has added a
                                clarifying requirement at (g)(1) that
                                excess spent solvent can't be added to
                                wipes to avoid disposal. (EQ).
261.4(b)(18)(i)..............  401.03(g)(3)-(7)--NH has added a
                                clarifying requirement at (g)(1) that
                                excess spent solvent can't be added to
                                wipes to avoid disposal. (EQ).
261.4(b)(18)(vi)(A)..........  401.03(b)(28)c.3--NH prohibits disposal
                                in NH MSW landfills. (BIS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 7014]]

 
 Special Consolidated Checklist for the Land Disposal Restrictions as of
                              June 30, 1992
------------------------------------------------------------------------
261.5(b)--(RC 34)............  503.01, 508, 1201.03(b)--NH has not
                                adopted the very small quantity
                                generator (VSQG) exclusion but does
                                exempt VSQGs from LDR requirements.
                                (MS).
261.5(f)(2); 261.5(g)(2)--(RC  503.01, 508--NH has not adopted the VSQG
 34).                           exclusion. (MS).
262.34(d)(4)--(RC 83)........  507.03(a)--NH rules allow generators of
                                between 100 and 1000 kgs./month to
                                accumulate up to 90 days rather than
                                180. (MS).
263.12--(RC 34)..............  104.63; 304.11; 601.01(b)(2) and (3);
                                701.01(a)--NH requires a permit for
                                transfer facilities. (MS).
268.1(c)(3)--(RCs 34, 39, 50,  1202.02(b)(1)--NH prohibits underground
 66, 78); 268.1(c)(3)(i)-       injection of HW. (MS)
 (ii)--(RC 78).
268.3(b)--(RCs 78, 102)......  1202.02(f), NH has not adopted an analog
                                to this provision. (MS).
268.5(a)-(i)--(RC 34)........  N/A--These federal regulations are not
                                being incorporated by reference, since
                                the authority is being retained by EPA;
                                102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1).
268.6(a)-(n)--(RC 34)........  N/A--These federal regulations are not
                                being incorporated by reference, since
                                the authority is being retained by EPA;
                                102.02(a); 1202.02(a)(1).
268.7(a)(10)--(RCs 78, 83)...  509.05; 1202.02(i)--NH has not adopted an
                                analog to this provision. (MS).
268.42(b)--(RCs 34, 39, 78)..  N/A--These federal regulations are not
                                being incorporated by reference, since
                                the authority is being retained by EPA;
                                102.02(a); 1202.02(a)(1).
268.44(a)-(g)--(RC 34).......  N/A--These federal regulations are not
                                being incorporated by reference, since
                                the authority is being retained by EPA;
                                102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Special Consolidated Checklist for the Phases I-IV Land Disposal
                  Restrictions as of December 31, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------------------
262.34(d)(4)--(RC 179).......  507.03(a)--NH rules allow generators of
                                between 100 and 1000 kgs./month to
                                accumulate up to 90 days rather than 180
                                (MS).
264.1(g)(6)--(RCs 124, 137)..  404.01; 701.02(a)(4)--NH rules do not
                                include language specifically allowing
                                dilution of D001 and D003 wastes in ENUs
                                and WWTUs. (MS).
265.1(c)(10)--(RCs 124, 137).  404.01, 701.02(a)(4)--NH rules do not
                                include language specifically allowing
                                dilution of D001 and D003 wastes in ENUs
                                and WWTUs. (MS).
268.1(c)(3)(i)-(ii)--(RC 151)  1202.02(b)(1)--NH prohibits underground
                                injection of HW. (MS).
268.3(b)--(RC 151)...........  1202.02(f)--NH has not adopted an analog
                                to this provision. (MS).
268.5(h)(2)(ii)-(vi)--(RC      N/A--These federal regulations are not
 109).                          being incorporated by reference, since
                                the authority is being retained by EPA;
                                102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1).
268.7(a)(7)--(RCs 137, 157,    509.05; 1202.01 incorporates 40 CFR 268
 167C).                         by reference; 1202.02(b)(2)--NH
                                prohibits underground injection of HW.
                                (MS).
268.42(b)--(RC 109)..........  N/A--These federal regulations are not
                                being incorporated by reference, since
                                the authority is being retained by EPA;
                                102.02(a); 1202.02(a)(1).
268.44(a)(1)-(2)--(RC 162)...  N/A--These federal regulations are not
                                being incorporated by reference, since
                                the authority is being retained by EPA;
                                102.02(a); 102.02(b)(1); 1202.02(a)(1).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Special Consolidated Checklist for the Wood Preserving Listings as of
                            December 31, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------------------
262.34(a)(1)(i)--(RC 92).....  507.01(a)--(EQ); 507.02(a)--(EQ);
                                509.02(a)(6)--(EQ); 507.02(b)-(f)--NH
                                requires storage on impervious surfaces;
                                secondary containment if wastes with
                                free liquids are stored near floor
                                drains, manholes, or sinks; and for
                                containers stored outside, protection
                                from precipitation, secondary
                                containment, and setbacks from wells and
                                storm drains (MS); 509.03(b), (e), (g)
                                and (i)--For satellite storage NH
                                requires: Training, appropriate
                                management of incompatible wastes, and
                                inspections. (MS).
262.34(a)(1)(ii)--(RC 92)....  507.01(a); 507.02(a)--(EQ); 507.03(a)--
                                (EQ); 509.02(a)(7)--(EQ); 508.03(d)--NH
                                requires federal VSQGs that accumulate
                                >=100 kg of HW in tanks to comply with
                                portions of Subpart J. (MS).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ State of New Hampshire's Hazardous Waste Rules, effective August 14,
  2017.

H. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect?

    When the final authorization takes effect, New Hampshire will issue 
permits for all the provisions for which it is authorized and will 
administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue to administer and 
enforce any RCRA and HSWA (Hazardous and Solid Waste Act) permits or 
portions of permits that it has issued in New Hampshire prior to the 
effective date of this authorization until the State incorporates the 
terms and conditions of the federal permits into the State RCRA 
permits. EPA will not issue any new permits, or new portions of 
permits, for the provisions listed in the Table above after the 
effective date of this authorization. EPA will continue to implement 
and issue permits for any HSWA requirements for which New Hampshire is 
not yet authorized. EPA has the authority to enforce state-issued 
permits after the State is authorized.

I. What is codification and is EPA codifying New Hampshire's hazardous 
waste program as authorized in this rule?

    Codification is the process of placing citations and references to 
the State's statutes and regulations that comprise the State's 
authorized hazardous waste program into the Code of Federal 
Regulations. EPA does this by adding these citations and references to 
the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. EPA is not proposing to 
codify the

[[Page 7015]]

authorization of New Hampshire's changes at this time. However, EPA 
reserves the ability to amend 40 CFR part 272, subpart EE for this 
authorization of New Hampshire's program changes at a later date.

J. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action 
from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 
1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action proposes to 
authorize State requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and 
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. 
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is 
not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory 
action because actions such as today's proposed authorization of New 
Hampshire's revised hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted 
under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.). Because this action proposes to authorize pre-existing 
requirements under State law and does not impose any additional 
enforceable duty beyond that required by State law, it does not contain 
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). For the same reason, this action also does not 
significantly or uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments, 
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on 
the relationship between the national government and the states, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels 
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 
August 10, 1999), because it merely proposes to authorize State 
requirements as part of the State RCRA hazardous waste program without 
altering the relationship or the distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by RCRA. This action also is not subject 
to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is 
not economically significant and it does not make decisions based on 
environmental health or safety risks. This action is not subject to 
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action 
under Executive Order 12866.
    Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA grants a state's application for 
authorization as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA. 
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it 
reviews a state authorization application, to require the use of any 
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard 
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required 
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), 
in proposing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate 
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and 
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied 
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining 
the takings implications of this action in accordance with the 
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk 
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive 
order. This action does not impose an information collection burden 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501 et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). Executive 
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes federal 
executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs 
federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by 
law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying 
and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse 
human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and 
activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the 
United States. Because this action proposes authorization of pre-
existing State rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less 
stringent than existing federal requirements, and imposes no additional 
requirements beyond those imposed by State law, and there are no 
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects, 
this proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority:  This action is issued under the authority of 
sections 2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act 
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).

    Dated: January 29, 2019.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2019-03590 Filed 2-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.