Agency Information Collection Activities: Reinstatement of a Previously Approved Collection of Information, 6863-6866 [2019-03511]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2019 / Notices Capital Investment Grant funding program. Capital Metro will comply with all relevant FTA requirements related to planning and project development to help analyze and screen alternatives in preparation for the NEPA process. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Early Scoping Early Scoping is an optional early step in the NEPA process that precedes formal scoping, which begins when FTA publishes a notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS). FTA encourages the use of early scoping for major planning activities that may receive FTA funding to start the NEPA process during earlier project planning phases. Early scoping is intended to generate public and agency review and comments on the scope of a planning effort within a defined transportation corridor, which helps the agency to determine which alignment variations should receive more focused development to streamline the NEPA process. Early scoping can serve not only to streamline the NEPA process, but also to firmly link transportation planning and NEPA, ensuring that the public and interested agencies are given the opportunity to review and provide comments on the results of planning activities that can then be used to inform the NEPA process. Project Connect Long-Term Vision Plan Over the last 30 months, Capital Metro has been conducting the Project Connect System Plan per general guidelines of the Federal Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) process. Capital Metro intends to formalize the PEL process with the initiation of early scoping for the Orange Line HCT Corridor, so that the results of the PEL may be considered during the formal NEPA environmental review process. Under this PEL process, Capital Metro will analyze alternatives that could be considered in an EIS, if warranted. The alternatives analysis will document the project’s purpose and need, analyze a range of reasonable, feasible, and prudent alternatives, and identify a locally preferred alternative (LPA) in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality’s and FTA’s regulations and guidance for implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1501.2 through 1501.8 and 23 CFR 771.111, respectively), which encourages Federal agencies to initiate NEPA early in their planning processes. Early scoping allows the scoping process to begin as soon as there is enough information to describe the proposal so that the public and relevant agencies can participate effectively. This VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Feb 27, 2019 Jkt 247001 notice opens early scoping and invites public and agency involvement with ongoing planning activities and studies for the Orange Line HCT Corridor, including review of the (a) purpose and need, (b) the proposed alternatives, and (c) the potential environmental, transportation, and community impacts and benefits to consider during the NEPA process. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Project Capital Metro invites comments on the following preliminary statement of the project’s purpose and need: The purpose of the project is to build a north-south transit corridor that provides faster, more reliable travel to, from, and within Central Austin and the surrounding region. The purpose is in response to the following needs in the corridor: • Growth affecting all travel modes and travel times; • limited ability to increase roadway width; • the need to provide better transit options linking affordable housing and jobs; • the need to connect activity centers and manage future growth with better transit; • create a central corridor for a better regional transit system; and • ensure inter-operability between the Orange Line and future corridors. Potential Alternatives During the early scoping process, all reasonable alternatives under consideration will be evaluated in terms of their transportation impacts, capital and operating costs, social, economic, and environmental impacts, and technical consideration. Capital Metro will continue to analyze alternative transit modes, alignment, and design options for HCT in the Orange Line Corridor. Capital Metro will seek to identify a broad range of alternatives, consistent with the project’s purpose and need. The alternatives will include a No Build Alternative, as well as the following proposed alternatives: • Baseline Alternative (MetroRapid 801 with transit speed and reliability improvements) • Dedicated Pathways Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • Dedicated Pathways Light Rail Transit (LRT) • Dedicated Pathways Autonomous Rapid Transit (ART) At the end of the early scoping process, FTA and Capital Metro anticipate identifying a preferred mode and alignment as the LPA for further PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6863 evaluation during the formal NEPA process. If an EIS is warranted, FTA will publish a Notice of Intent in the Federal Register and the public and interested agencies will have the opportunity to participate in a review and comment period on the scope of the EIS. Robert C. Patrick, Regional Administrator, FTA Region VI. [FR Doc. 2019–03479 Filed 2–27–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–57–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary [Docket No. DOT–OST–2015–0221] Agency Information Collection Activities: Reinstatement of a Previously Approved Collection of Information Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for comments. AGENCY: The Department of Transportation (DOT) invites public comments on our intention to request Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information collection (OMB Control Number 2105–0563) in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The collection is necessary for administration of the BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants Program. BUILD Transportation grants support surface transportation infrastructure projects that have a significant local or regional impact. A 60-day Federal Register notice was published on December 28, 2018 (83 FR 67484). Since the publication of the 60day Federal Register notice, no comments were received to the Docket (DOT–OST–2015–0221) and therefore no review of comments was required, so none was performed by the Department. DATES: Written comments should be submitted by: April 1, 2019. ADDRESSES: To ensure that you do not duplicate your docket submissions, please submit them by only one of the following means: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM 28FEN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 6864 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2019 / Notices • Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W–12–140 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. Instructions: To ensure proper docketing of your comment, please include the agency name and docket number [DOT–OST–2015–0221] at the beginning of your comments. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Hill, Office of the Under Secretary for Transportation Policy, at 202–366–0301 or BUILDgrants@dot.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 2105–0563. Title: National Infrastructure Investments or ‘‘BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants’’. Form Numbers: None. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Background: The Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development or ‘‘BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants’’ program was created as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Through the Recovery Act and nine appropriations acts, Congress provided DOT with funding for ten rounds of competitive grants totaling nearly $5.6 billion for capital and planning investments in surface transportation infrastructure. DOT published a notice in the Federal Register on April 27, 2018 announcing the availability of $1.5 billion for the latest round of BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants (83 FR 18651–01). BUILD recipients provide information to the Government so that the Government may monitor the financial conditions and construction progress of BUILDsupported projects and the effectiveness of those projects using performance measurement metrics negotiated between the recipients and the Government. This notice seeks comments on the existing information collection, which collects information from grantees that is necessary for grant applications and the reporting requirements agreed to by recipients of TIGER and BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants. The reporting requirements for the program is as follows: In order to be considered to receive a BUILD grant, a project sponsor must submit an application to DOT containing a project narrative, as detailed in the Notice of Funding Opportunity. The project narrative VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Feb 27, 2019 Jkt 247001 should include the information necessary for the Department to determine that the project satisfies eligibility requirements as warranted by law. This request renews the existing clearance to cover applications solicited for future National Infrastructure Investments appropriations, solicited in a manner similar to the solicitation for TIGER and BUILD applications. Following the announcement of a funding award, the recipient and DOT will negotiate and sign a grant agreement. In the grant agreement, the recipient must describe the project that DOT agreed to fund, which is typically the project that was described in the TIGER/BUILD application or a reducedscope version of that project. The grant agreement must also include a detailed breakdown of the project schedule and a budget listing all major activities that will be completed as part of the project. During the project management stage, grantees will submit reports on the financial condition of the project and the project’s progress. Grantees will submit progress and monitoring reports to the Government on a quarterly basis, beginning on the 20th of the first month of the calendar-year quarter following the execution of a grant agreement, and on the 20th of the first month of each calendar-year quarter thereafter until completion of the project. The report will include an executive summary and sections to show: Project activities; outstanding issues; project schedule; project cost; project funding status; and project quality, along with an SF–425 Federal Financial Report. This information will be used to monitor grantees’ use of Federal funds, ensuring accountability and financial transparency in the TIGER/BUILD program. Grantees will also submit reports on project performance using certain performance measures that the grantee and the Government select through negotiations. The Grantees will submit a Pre-project Report that will consist of current baseline data for each of the performance measures specified in the grant agreement. The Pre-project Report will include a detailed description of data sources, assumptions, variability, and the estimated level of precision for each measure. The Grantees will submit annual interim Project Performance Measurement Reports to the Government for each of the performance measures. Grantees will submit reports for three years. The Grantees will submit a Project Outcomes Report after the project is completed that will consist of a narrative discussion detailing project successes and/or the PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 influence of external factors on project expectations. This information collected will be used to analyze project performance. The Department’s estimated burden for this information collection is the following: Expected Number of Respondents: 850 applications. Frequency: Quarterly, and Yearly. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 100 hours for each Application, 1 hour for each Grant Agreement, 6.5 hours for each request for Quarterly Progress and Monitoring Report; 6 hours for each Quarterly Performance Measurement Report. Estimated Total Annual Burden: 106,325 hours. The following is detailed information and instructions regarding the specific reporting requirements for each report identified above: Application In order to be considered to receive a BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant, prospective grantees must submit an application to DOT containing a project narrative, as detailed in the Notice of Funding Opportunity, with the following timing and frequency requirements: Æ Frequency: Typically, annually, as funding is appropriated by Congress. Æ Application covers: Project narrative and information necessary for the Department to determine that the project satisfies eligibility requirements. Æ Start: At the opening date of the Notice of Funding Opportunity. Æ End: At the closing date of the Notice of Funding Opportunity. Grant Agreement BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program grantees will negotiate and sign a grant agreement with DOT, with the following timing and frequency requirements: Æ Frequency: One time. Æ Grant agreement covers: Detailed project scope, schedule, and budget, and terms of agreement between DOT and the grantee. Æ Start: After funding announcements have been made by DOT. Æ End: At the end of the obligation period, as set by Congress, typically two or three years after funding has been appropriated. Project Progress and Monitoring Report BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit a Project Progress and Monitoring Report to the Government with the following timing and frequency requirements: Æ Frequency: Quarterly. E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM 28FEN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2019 / Notices Æ Report covers: Previous quarter. Æ Start: Upon award of grant. Æ End: Once construction is complete. Grantees use the following structure when preparing this report: The following list enumerates the required sections in the quarterly progress reports. At the discretion of the USDOT, modifications or additions can be made to produce a quarterly reporting format that will most effectively serve both the Recipient and the USDOT. Some projects will have a more extensive quarterly status than others. For smaller projects, the USDOT may determine that the content of the quarterly reports will be streamlined and project status meetings will be held on a less-frequent basis. The first quarterly progress report should include a detailed description, and where appropriate, drawings, of the items funded. (a) Project Overall Status. This section provides an overall status of the project’s scope, schedule and budget. The Recipient shall note and explain any deviations from the scope of work described in Attachment A, the schedule described in Attachment B, or the budget described in Attachment C. (b) Project Significant Activities and Issues. This section provides highlights of key activities, accomplishments, and issues occurring on the project during the previous quarter. Activities and deliverables to be reported on should include meetings, audits and other reviews, design packages submitted, advertisements, awards, construction submittals, construction completion milestones, submittals related to any applicable Recovery Act requirements, media or Congressional inquiries, value engineering/constructability reviews, and other items of significance. (c) Action Items/Outstanding Issues. This section should draw attention to, and track the progress of, highly significant or sensitive issues requiring action and direction in order to resolve. In general, issues and administrative requirements that could have a significant or adverse impact to the project’s scope, budget, schedule, quality, safety, and/or compliance with Federal requirements should be included. Status, responsible person(s), and due dates should be included for each action item/outstanding issue. Action items requiring action or direction should be included in the quarterly status meeting agenda. The action items/outstanding issues may be dropped from this section upon full implementation of the remedial action, and upon no further monitoring anticipated. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Feb 27, 2019 Jkt 247001 (d) Project Scope Overview. The purpose of this section is to provide a further update regarding the project scope. If the original scope contained in the grant agreement is still accurate, this section can simply state that the scope is unchanged. (e) Project Schedule. An updated master program schedule reflecting the current status of the program activities should be included in this section. A Gantt (bar) type chart is probably the most appropriate for quarterly reporting purposes, with the ultimate format to be agreed upon between the Recipient and the USDOT. It is imperative that the master program schedule be integrated, i.e., the individual contract milestones tied to each other, such that any delays occurring in one activity will be reflected throughout the entire program schedule, with a realistic completion date being reported. Narratives, tables, and/or graphs should accompany the updated master program schedule, basically detailing the current schedule status, delays and potential exposures, and recovery efforts. The following information should also be included: • Current overall project completion percentage vs. latest plan percentage. • Completion percentages vs. latest plan percentages for major activities such as right-of-way, major or critical design contracts, major or critical construction contracts, and significant force accounts or task orders. A schedule status description should also be included for each of these major or critical elements. • Any delays or potential exposures to milestone and final completion dates. The delays and exposures should be quantified, and overall schedule impacts assessed. The reasons for the delays and exposures should be explained, and initiatives being analyzed or implemented in order to recover the schedule should be detailed. (f) Project Cost. An updated cost spreadsheet reflecting the current forecasted cost vs. the latest approved budget vs. the baseline budget should be included in this section. One way to track project cost is to show: (1) Baseline Budget, (2) Latest Approved Budget, (3) Current Forecasted Cost Estimate, (4) Expenditures or Commitments to Date, and (5) Variance between Current Forecasted Cost and Latest Approved Budget. Line items should include all significant cost centers, such as prior costs, right-ofway, preliminary engineering, environmental mitigation, general engineering consultant, section design contracts, construction administration, utilities, construction packages, force accounts/task orders, wrap-up PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6865 insurance, construction contingencies, management contingencies, and other contingencies. The line items can be broken-up in enough detail such that specific areas of cost change can be sufficiently tracked and future improvements made to the overall cost estimating methodology. A Program Total line should be included at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Narratives, tables, and/or graphs should accompany the updated cost spreadsheet, basically detailing the current cost status, reasons for cost deviations, impacts of cost overruns, and efforts to mitigate cost overruns. The following information should be provided: • Reasons for each line item deviation from the approved budget, impacts resulting from the deviations, and initiatives being analyzed or implemented in order to recover any cost overruns. • Transfer of costs to and from contingency line items, and reasons supporting the transfers. • Speculative cost changes that potentially may develop in the future, a quantified dollar range for each potential cost change, and the current status of the speculative change. Also, a comparison analysis to the available contingency amounts should be included, showing that reasonable and sufficient amounts of contingency remain to keep the project within the latest approved budget. • Detailed cost breakdown of the general engineering consultant (GEC) services (if applicable), including such line items as contract amounts, task orders issued (amounts), balance remaining for tasks, and accrued (billable) costs. • Federal obligations and/or disbursements for the project, compared to planned obligations and disbursements. (g) Federal Financial Report (SF–425). The Federal Financial Report (SF–425) is a financial reporting form used throughout the Federal Government Grant system. Recipients shall complete this form and attach it to each quarterly Project Progress and Monitoring Report. The form is available at https:// www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ omb/assets/grants_forms/SF-425.pdf. (h) Certifications. A certification that the Recipient is in compliance with 2 CFR 200.303 (Internal Controls) and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F (Audit Requirements). Performance Measurement Reports BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit Performance Measure Reports on the performance (or projected performance) E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM 28FEN1 6866 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2019 / Notices khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES of the project using the performance measures that the grantee and the Government selected through negotiations with the following timing and frequency requirements: Æ Frequency: Quarterly. Æ Report covers: Previous year. Æ Start: Once, upon award of grant; Annual, for three years after construction completes; once, no later than four years after construction completes. Æ End: At the end of agreed upon performance measurement period. Grantees should use the following structure when preparing this report: 1. Performance Measure Data Collection. The Recipient shall collect the data necessary to report on each performance measure that is identified in the grant agreement. Grantees may select performance measures from the list available at https:// www.transportation.gov/ administrations/office-policy/tigerperformance-measurement-guidanceappendix, according to the type of project. 2. Pre-project Performance Measurement Report. The Recipient shall submit to DOT, on or before the Pre-project Report Date that is stated in the grant agreement, a Pre-project Performance Measurement Report that contains: (1) Baseline data for each performance measure that is identified in the grant VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Feb 27, 2019 Jkt 247001 agreement, accurate as of the Pre-project Measurement Date; and (2) a detailed description of the data sources, assumptions, variability, and estimated levels of precision for each measure. 3. Interim Performance Measurement Reports. After project completion, the Recipient shall submit to DOT on or before each of the periodic reporting dates specified in the Performance Measurement Table in the grant agreement, an Interim Performance Measurement Report containing data for each performance measure that is identified in that table, accurate as of the final date of the measurement period specified in that table. If an external factor significantly affects the value of a performance measure during a measurement period, then in the Interim Performance Measurement Report the Recipient shall identify that external factor and discuss its influence on the performance measure. 4. Project Outcomes Report. The Recipient shall submit to DOT, on or before the Project Outcomes Report Date that is stated in the grant agreement, a Project Outcomes Report that contains: (1) A narrative discussion detailing project successes and the influence of external factors on project expectations; (2) all baseline and interim performance measurement data that the Recipient reported in the Pre-project PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Performance Measurement Report and the Interim Performance Measurement Reports; and (3) an ex post examination of project effectiveness relative to the baseline data that the Recipient reported in the Pre-project Performance Measurement Report. Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for OST’s performance; (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for OST to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB’s clearance of this information collection. Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48. Issued in Washington, DC, on February, 22, 2019. John Augustine, Director, Office of Infrastructure Finance and Innovation. [FR Doc. 2019–03511 Filed 2–27–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM 28FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 40 (Thursday, February 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6863-6866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0221]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Reinstatement of a 
Previously Approved Collection of Information

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), U.S. 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (DOT) invites public comments 
on our intention to request Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
approval to renew an information collection (OMB Control Number 2105-
0563) in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995. The collection is necessary for administration of the 
BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants Program. BUILD Transportation 
grants support surface transportation infrastructure projects that have 
a significant local or regional impact. A 60-day Federal Register 
notice was published on December 28, 2018 (83 FR 67484). Since the 
publication of the 60-day Federal Register notice, no comments were 
received to the Docket (DOT-OST-2015-0221) and therefore no review of 
comments was required, so none was performed by the Department.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by: April 1, 2019.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that you do not duplicate your docket submissions, 
please submit them by only one of the following means:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

[[Page 6864]]

     Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W-12-140 
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
    Instructions: To ensure proper docketing of your comment, please 
include the agency name and docket number [DOT-OST-2015-0221] at the 
beginning of your comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal 
information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Hill, Office of the Under 
Secretary for Transportation Policy, at 202-366-0301 or 
BUILDgrants@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 2105-0563.
    Title: National Infrastructure Investments or ``BUILD 
Transportation Discretionary Grants''.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Background: The Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage 
Development or ``BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants'' program 
was created as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
2009. Through the Recovery Act and nine appropriations acts, Congress 
provided DOT with funding for ten rounds of competitive grants totaling 
nearly $5.6 billion for capital and planning investments in surface 
transportation infrastructure. DOT published a notice in the Federal 
Register on April 27, 2018 announcing the availability of $1.5 billion 
for the latest round of BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants (83 
FR 18651-01). BUILD recipients provide information to the Government so 
that the Government may monitor the financial conditions and 
construction progress of BUILD-supported projects and the effectiveness 
of those projects using performance measurement metrics negotiated 
between the recipients and the Government.
    This notice seeks comments on the existing information collection, 
which collects information from grantees that is necessary for grant 
applications and the reporting requirements agreed to by recipients of 
TIGER and BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants.
    The reporting requirements for the program is as follows:
    In order to be considered to receive a BUILD grant, a project 
sponsor must submit an application to DOT containing a project 
narrative, as detailed in the Notice of Funding Opportunity. The 
project narrative should include the information necessary for the 
Department to determine that the project satisfies eligibility 
requirements as warranted by law. This request renews the existing 
clearance to cover applications solicited for future National 
Infrastructure Investments appropriations, solicited in a manner 
similar to the solicitation for TIGER and BUILD applications.
    Following the announcement of a funding award, the recipient and 
DOT will negotiate and sign a grant agreement. In the grant agreement, 
the recipient must describe the project that DOT agreed to fund, which 
is typically the project that was described in the TIGER/BUILD 
application or a reduced-scope version of that project. The grant 
agreement must also include a detailed breakdown of the project 
schedule and a budget listing all major activities that will be 
completed as part of the project.
    During the project management stage, grantees will submit reports 
on the financial condition of the project and the project's progress. 
Grantees will submit progress and monitoring reports to the Government 
on a quarterly basis, beginning on the 20th of the first month of the 
calendar-year quarter following the execution of a grant agreement, and 
on the 20th of the first month of each calendar-year quarter thereafter 
until completion of the project. The report will include an executive 
summary and sections to show: Project activities; outstanding issues; 
project schedule; project cost; project funding status; and project 
quality, along with an SF-425 Federal Financial Report.
    This information will be used to monitor grantees' use of Federal 
funds, ensuring accountability and financial transparency in the TIGER/
BUILD program.
    Grantees will also submit reports on project performance using 
certain performance measures that the grantee and the Government select 
through negotiations. The Grantees will submit a Pre-project Report 
that will consist of current baseline data for each of the performance 
measures specified in the grant agreement. The Pre-project Report will 
include a detailed description of data sources, assumptions, 
variability, and the estimated level of precision for each measure. The 
Grantees will submit annual interim Project Performance Measurement 
Reports to the Government for each of the performance measures. 
Grantees will submit reports for three years. The Grantees will submit 
a Project Outcomes Report after the project is completed that will 
consist of a narrative discussion detailing project successes and/or 
the influence of external factors on project expectations.
    This information collected will be used to analyze project 
performance.
    The Department's estimated burden for this information collection 
is the following:
    Expected Number of Respondents: 850 applications.
    Frequency: Quarterly, and Yearly.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 100 hours for each 
Application, 1 hour for each Grant Agreement, 6.5 hours for each 
request for Quarterly Progress and Monitoring Report; 6 hours for each 
Quarterly Performance Measurement Report.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 106,325 hours.
    The following is detailed information and instructions regarding 
the specific reporting requirements for each report identified above:

Application

    In order to be considered to receive a BUILD Transportation 
Discretionary Grant, prospective grantees must submit an application to 
DOT containing a project narrative, as detailed in the Notice of 
Funding Opportunity, with the following timing and frequency 
requirements:
    [cir] Frequency: Typically, annually, as funding is appropriated by 
Congress.
    [cir] Application covers: Project narrative and information 
necessary for the Department to determine that the project satisfies 
eligibility requirements.
    [cir] Start: At the opening date of the Notice of Funding 
Opportunity.
    [cir] End: At the closing date of the Notice of Funding 
Opportunity.

Grant Agreement

    BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program grantees will 
negotiate and sign a grant agreement with DOT, with the following 
timing and frequency requirements:
    [cir] Frequency: One time.
    [cir] Grant agreement covers: Detailed project scope, schedule, and 
budget, and terms of agreement between DOT and the grantee.
    [cir] Start: After funding announcements have been made by DOT.
    [cir] End: At the end of the obligation period, as set by Congress, 
typically two or three years after funding has been appropriated.

Project Progress and Monitoring Report

    BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program grantees will 
submit a Project Progress and Monitoring Report to the Government with 
the following timing and frequency requirements:
    [cir] Frequency: Quarterly.

[[Page 6865]]

    [cir] Report covers: Previous quarter.
    [cir] Start: Upon award of grant.
    [cir] End: Once construction is complete.
    Grantees use the following structure when preparing this report:
    The following list enumerates the required sections in the 
quarterly progress reports. At the discretion of the USDOT, 
modifications or additions can be made to produce a quarterly reporting 
format that will most effectively serve both the Recipient and the 
USDOT. Some projects will have a more extensive quarterly status than 
others. For smaller projects, the USDOT may determine that the content 
of the quarterly reports will be streamlined and project status 
meetings will be held on a less-frequent basis. The first quarterly 
progress report should include a detailed description, and where 
appropriate, drawings, of the items funded.
    (a) Project Overall Status. This section provides an overall status 
of the project's scope, schedule and budget. The Recipient shall note 
and explain any deviations from the scope of work described in 
Attachment A, the schedule described in Attachment B, or the budget 
described in Attachment C.
    (b) Project Significant Activities and Issues. This section 
provides highlights of key activities, accomplishments, and issues 
occurring on the project during the previous quarter. Activities and 
deliverables to be reported on should include meetings, audits and 
other reviews, design packages submitted, advertisements, awards, 
construction submittals, construction completion milestones, submittals 
related to any applicable Recovery Act requirements, media or 
Congressional inquiries, value engineering/constructability reviews, 
and other items of significance.
    (c) Action Items/Outstanding Issues. This section should draw 
attention to, and track the progress of, highly significant or 
sensitive issues requiring action and direction in order to resolve. In 
general, issues and administrative requirements that could have a 
significant or adverse impact to the project's scope, budget, schedule, 
quality, safety, and/or compliance with Federal requirements should be 
included. Status, responsible person(s), and due dates should be 
included for each action item/outstanding issue. Action items requiring 
action or direction should be included in the quarterly status meeting 
agenda. The action items/outstanding issues may be dropped from this 
section upon full implementation of the remedial action, and upon no 
further monitoring anticipated.
    (d) Project Scope Overview. The purpose of this section is to 
provide a further update regarding the project scope. If the original 
scope contained in the grant agreement is still accurate, this section 
can simply state that the scope is unchanged.
    (e) Project Schedule. An updated master program schedule reflecting 
the current status of the program activities should be included in this 
section. A Gantt (bar) type chart is probably the most appropriate for 
quarterly reporting purposes, with the ultimate format to be agreed 
upon between the Recipient and the USDOT. It is imperative that the 
master program schedule be integrated, i.e., the individual contract 
milestones tied to each other, such that any delays occurring in one 
activity will be reflected throughout the entire program schedule, with 
a realistic completion date being reported. Narratives, tables, and/or 
graphs should accompany the updated master program schedule, basically 
detailing the current schedule status, delays and potential exposures, 
and recovery efforts. The following information should also be 
included:
     Current overall project completion percentage vs. latest 
plan percentage.
     Completion percentages vs. latest plan percentages for 
major activities such as right-of-way, major or critical design 
contracts, major or critical construction contracts, and significant 
force accounts or task orders. A schedule status description should 
also be included for each of these major or critical elements.
     Any delays or potential exposures to milestone and final 
completion dates. The delays and exposures should be quantified, and 
overall schedule impacts assessed. The reasons for the delays and 
exposures should be explained, and initiatives being analyzed or 
implemented in order to recover the schedule should be detailed.
    (f) Project Cost. An updated cost spreadsheet reflecting the 
current forecasted cost vs. the latest approved budget vs. the baseline 
budget should be included in this section. One way to track project 
cost is to show: (1) Baseline Budget, (2) Latest Approved Budget, (3) 
Current Forecasted Cost Estimate, (4) Expenditures or Commitments to 
Date, and (5) Variance between Current Forecasted Cost and Latest 
Approved Budget. Line items should include all significant cost 
centers, such as prior costs, right-of-way, preliminary engineering, 
environmental mitigation, general engineering consultant, section 
design contracts, construction administration, utilities, construction 
packages, force accounts/task orders, wrap-up insurance, construction 
contingencies, management contingencies, and other contingencies. The 
line items can be broken-up in enough detail such that specific areas 
of cost change can be sufficiently tracked and future improvements made 
to the overall cost estimating methodology. A Program Total line should 
be included at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Narratives, tables, and/
or graphs should accompany the updated cost spreadsheet, basically 
detailing the current cost status, reasons for cost deviations, impacts 
of cost overruns, and efforts to mitigate cost overruns. The following 
information should be provided:
     Reasons for each line item deviation from the approved 
budget, impacts resulting from the deviations, and initiatives being 
analyzed or implemented in order to recover any cost overruns.
     Transfer of costs to and from contingency line items, and 
reasons supporting the transfers.
     Speculative cost changes that potentially may develop in 
the future, a quantified dollar range for each potential cost change, 
and the current status of the speculative change. Also, a comparison 
analysis to the available contingency amounts should be included, 
showing that reasonable and sufficient amounts of contingency remain to 
keep the project within the latest approved budget.
     Detailed cost breakdown of the general engineering 
consultant (GEC) services (if applicable), including such line items as 
contract amounts, task orders issued (amounts), balance remaining for 
tasks, and accrued (billable) costs.
     Federal obligations and/or disbursements for the project, 
compared to planned obligations and disbursements.
    (g) Federal Financial Report (SF-425). The Federal Financial Report 
(SF-425) is a financial reporting form used throughout the Federal 
Government Grant system. Recipients shall complete this form and attach 
it to each quarterly Project Progress and Monitoring Report. The form 
is available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/grants_forms/SF-425.pdf.
    (h) Certifications. A certification that the Recipient is in 
compliance with 2 CFR 200.303 (Internal Controls) and 2 CFR part 200, 
subpart F (Audit Requirements).

Performance Measurement Reports

    BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program grantees will 
submit Performance Measure Reports on the performance (or projected 
performance)

[[Page 6866]]

of the project using the performance measures that the grantee and the 
Government selected through negotiations with the following timing and 
frequency requirements:
    [cir] Frequency: Quarterly.
    [cir] Report covers: Previous year.
    [cir] Start: Once, upon award of grant; Annual, for three years 
after construction completes; once, no later than four years after 
construction completes.
    [cir] End: At the end of agreed upon performance measurement 
period.
    Grantees should use the following structure when preparing this 
report:
    1. Performance Measure Data Collection. The Recipient shall collect 
the data necessary to report on each performance measure that is 
identified in the grant agreement. Grantees may select performance 
measures from the list available at https://www.transportation.gov/administrations/office-policy/tiger-performance-measurement-guidance-appendix, according to the type of project.
    2. Pre-project Performance Measurement Report. The Recipient shall 
submit to DOT, on or before the Pre-project Report Date that is stated 
in the grant agreement, a Pre-project Performance Measurement Report 
that contains:
    (1) Baseline data for each performance measure that is identified 
in the grant agreement, accurate as of the Pre-project Measurement 
Date; and
    (2) a detailed description of the data sources, assumptions, 
variability, and estimated levels of precision for each measure.
    3. Interim Performance Measurement Reports. After project 
completion, the Recipient shall submit to DOT on or before each of the 
periodic reporting dates specified in the Performance Measurement Table 
in the grant agreement, an Interim Performance Measurement Report 
containing data for each performance measure that is identified in that 
table, accurate as of the final date of the measurement period 
specified in that table. If an external factor significantly affects 
the value of a performance measure during a measurement period, then in 
the Interim Performance Measurement Report the Recipient shall identify 
that external factor and discuss its influence on the performance 
measure.
    4. Project Outcomes Report. The Recipient shall submit to DOT, on 
or before the Project Outcomes Report Date that is stated in the grant 
agreement, a Project Outcomes Report that contains:
    (1) A narrative discussion detailing project successes and the 
influence of external factors on project expectations;
    (2) all baseline and interim performance measurement data that the 
Recipient reported in the Pre-project Performance Measurement Report 
and the Interim Performance Measurement Reports; and
    (3) an ex post examination of project effectiveness relative to the 
baseline data that the Recipient reported in the Pre-project 
Performance Measurement Report.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for OST's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for OST to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February, 22, 2019.
John Augustine,
Director, Office of Infrastructure Finance and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2019-03511 Filed 2-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.