Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 5589-5592 [2019-02930]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Requirements Bulletin 737–25–1758 RB,
dated November 8, 2017.
Note 1 to paragraph (g)(2) of this AD:
Guidance for accomplishing the actions
required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD can
be found in Boeing Service Bulletin 737–25–
1758, dated November 8, 2017, which is
referred to in Boeing Requirements Bulletin
737–25–1758 RB, dated November 8, 2017.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737–25–1728,
dated October 10, 2016, uses the phrase ‘‘the
original issue date of this service bulletin,’’
this AD requires using ‘‘the effective date of
this AD.’’
(2) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where Boeing Requirements Bulletin 737–
25–1758 RB, dated November 8, 2017, uses
the phrase ‘‘the original issue date of the
Requirements Bulletin (RB),’’ this AD
requires using ‘‘the effective date of this AD.’’
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as RC, the provisions
of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Feb 21, 2019
Jkt 247001
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Scott Craig, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206–231–3566; email:
Michael.S.Craig@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–25–1728,
dated October 10, 2016.
(ii) Boeing Requirements Bulletin 737–25–
1758 RB, dated November 8, 2017.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
February 1, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–02932 Filed 2–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0409; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–120–AD; Amendment
39–19559; AD 2019–03–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017–16–
SUMMARY:
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
05, which applied to certain The Boeing
Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, –900, and –900ER series
airplanes. AD 2017–16–05 required a
one-time detailed visual inspection for
discrepancies in the Krueger flap
bullnose attachment hardware, and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. This AD adds
airplanes and an additional inspection
to determine if any Krueger flap no. 1,
2, 3, or 4 has been replaced, and related
investigative and corrective actions.
Since this is a rotable parts issue, the
applicability of this AD has been
expanded beyond the airplanes listed in
the related service bulletin to include all
airplanes on which a Krueger flap
bullnose may be installed. This AD was
prompted by a report of a Krueger flap
bullnose departing an airplane during
taxi, which caused damage to the wing
structure and thrust reverser, and a
report of a missing no. 2 Krueger flap
bullnose hinge bolt from an airplane
that was not included in the effectivity
of AD 2017–16–05. We are issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 29,
2019.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 29, 2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
phone: 562–797–1717; internet: https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0409.
Examining the AD Docket
14 CFR Part 39
PO 00000
5589
Sfmt 4700
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0409; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
5590
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
231–3527; email: alan.pohl@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2017–16–05,
Amendment 39–18982 (82 FR39344,
August 18, 2017) (‘‘AD 2017–16–05’’).
AD 2017–16–05 applied to certain The
Boeing Company Model 737–600, –700,
–700C, –800, –900, and –900ER series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on May 15, 2018 (83
FR22420). The NPRM was prompted by
a report of a Krueger flap bullnose
departing an airplane during taxi, which
caused damage to the wing structure
and thrust reverser, and a report of a
missing no. 2 Krueger flap bullnose
hinge bolt from an airplane that was not
included in the effectivity of AD 2017–
16–05. The NPRM proposed to continue
to require a one-time detailed visual
inspection for discrepancies in the
Krueger flap bullnose attachment
hardware, and related investigative and
corrective actions, if necessary. The
NPRM also proposed to add airplanes
and an additional inspection to
determine if any Krueger flap no. 1, 2,
3, or 4 has been replaced, and related
investigative and corrective actions.
Since this is a rotable parts issue, the
applicability of this AD has been
expanded beyond the airplanes listed in
the related service bulletin to include all
airplanes on which a Krueger flap
bullnose may be installed. We are
issuing this AD to address missing
Krueger flap bullnose hardware. Such
missing hardware could result in the
Krueger flap bullnose departing the
airplane during flight, which could
damage empennage structure and lead
to the inability to maintain continued
safe flight and landing.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
American Airlines (AAL) concurred
with the intent of the NPRM.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment
of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that
accomplishing the Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) ST00830SE does not
affect the actions specified in the
NPRM.
We concur with the commenter. We
have redesignated paragraph (c) of the
proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this
AD and added paragraph (c)(2) to this
AD to state that installation of STC
ST00830SE does not affect the ability to
accomplish the actions required by this
AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which
STC ST00830SE is installed, a ‘‘change
in product’’ alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is
not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Request To Remove Airplanes From the
Applicability
All Nippon Airways (ANA) requested
that we remove the airplanes identified
in paragraph (c)(3) of the proposed AD.
ANA stated that those airplanes are not
required to do the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD.
We disagree with the request.
Although the airplanes identified in
paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this AD
(paragraph (c)(3) of the proposed AD)
are not required to do the actions
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
those airplanes must still comply with
the parts installation limitation
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD. We
have not changed this AD in this regard.
Request for a Different Method of
Compliance
DAL requested that we include an
option in paragraph (i) of the proposed
AD to install the Krueger flap before
accomplishing the required actions.
DAL mentioned that it has updated its
manuals to inspect after installation on
the airplane, not prior to installation.
We agree that clarification is
necessary. The required inspection of
the Krueger flap bullnose can only be
accomplished after installation on the
Krueger flap assembly, either prior to or
after installation on the airplane. We
have revised paragraph (i) to specify
that the actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD must be accomplished
after installation but prior to further
flight.
Support for the NPRM
Request To Clarify Which Krueger
Flaps Are Affected
Boeing concurred with the content of
the NPRM. Delta Air Lines (DAL) and
DAL and AAL requested that we
clarify paragraph (i) of the proposed AD
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Feb 21, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to specify affected Krueger flap(s) and
Krueger flap bullnose(s). DAL stated
that not all four positions need to be
inspected, only the Krueger flap(s) and
Krueger flap bullnose(s) being installed.
AAL suggested that we reword
paragraph (i) of the proposed AD to
improve clarity.
We agree with the request because it
is not necessary to perform the actions
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD on
all four Krueger flap(s) or Krueger flap
bullnose(s). Only the Krueger flap(s) or
Krueger flap bullnose(s) being installed
must be inspected. We have revised
paragraph (i) of this AD to specify:
‘‘These actions are required only for the
Krueger flap(s) or Krueger flap
bullnose(s) being installed.’’
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously,
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737–57A1327, Revision 2,
dated July 25, 2017. This service
information describes procedures for a
one-time detailed visual inspection for
discrepancies in the Krueger flap
bullnose attachment hardware, and
related investigative and corrective
actions; and an inspection to determine
if any Krueger flap no. 1, 2, 3, or 4 has
been replaced, and related investigative
and corrective actions. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1,814
airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
the following costs to comply with this
AD:
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
5591
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspection of the Krueger flap bullnose hardware (1,495 airplanes) (retained actions from AD 2017–16–05).
Inspection to determine if any Krueger flap no. 1, 2, 3, or 4
has been replaced (1,814 airplanes) (new action).
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all available costs in our
cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes and associated appliances to
the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Feb 21, 2019
Jkt 247001
3 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $255.
3 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $255.
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017–16–05, Amendment 39–18982 (82
FR 39344, August 18, 2017), and adding
the following new AD:
■
2019–03–07 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19559; Docket No.
FAA–2018–0409; Product Identifier
2017–NM–120–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective March 29, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2017–16–05,
Amendment 39–18982 (82 FR 39344, August
18, 2017) (‘‘AD 2017–16–05’’).
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, –900, and –900ER series airplanes,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost per
product
Parts cost
Cost on U.S.
operators
$0
$255
$381,225
0
255
462,570
certificated in any category, as specified in
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iii) of this
AD.
(i) Airplanes in Groups 1 and 2 as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–57A1327, Revision 2, dated July 25,
2017 (‘‘BASB 737–57A1327, R2’’).
(ii) Airplanes in Group 3, as identified in
BASB 737–57A1327, R2, except where this
service bulletin specifies the groups as line
numbers 6422 through 6465 inclusive, this
AD specifies those groups as line number
6422 through any line number airplane with
an original Certificate of Airworthiness or an
original Export Certificate of Airworthiness
dated on or before the effective date of this
AD.
(iii) All Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, –900 and –900ER series airplanes with
an original Certificate of Airworthiness or an
original Export Certificate of Airworthiness
dated after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) ST00830SE does not affect
the ability to accomplish the actions required
by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which
STC ST00830SE is installed, a ‘‘change in
product’’ alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to
comply with the requirements of 14 CFR
39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of a
Krueger flap bullnose departing an airplane
during taxi, which caused damage to the
wing structure and thrust reverser, and a
report of a missing no. 2 Krueger flap
bullnose hinge bolt from an airplane that was
not included in the effectivity of AD 2017–
16–05. We are issuing this AD to address
missing Krueger flap bullnose hardware.
Such missing hardware could result in the
Krueger flap bullnose departing the airplane
during flight, which could damage
empennage structure and lead to the inability
to maintain continued safe flight and
landing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
For airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1)(i) and (c)(1)(ii) of this AD: Except as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of BASB 737–57A1327, R2,
do all applicable actions identified as ‘‘RC’’
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
5592
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(required for compliance) in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of BASB 737–57A1327, R2.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where BASB 737–57A1327, R2 uses the
phrase ‘‘the original issue date of this service
bulletin,’’ this AD requires using September
22, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017–16–
05).
(2) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where BASB 737–57A1327, R2 uses the
phrase ‘‘the Revision 2 date of this service
bulletin,’’ this AD requires using ‘‘the
effective date of this AD.’’
(i) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a Krueger flap or Krueger
flap bullnose on any airplane identified in
paragraph (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of
this AD, unless the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD have been
accomplished on the Krueger flap bullnose
after installation but prior to further flight.
These actions are required only for the
Krueger flap(s) or Krueger flap bullnose(s)
being installed.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before
September 22, 2017 (the effective date of AD
2017–16–05), using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737–57A1327, dated May 20, 2016.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD, using Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–57A1327, Revision 1,
dated September 28, 2016.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Feb 21, 2019
Jkt 247001
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2017–16–05 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of BASB 737–
57A1327, R2 that are required by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
(5) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as RC, the provisions
of paragraphs (k)(5)(i) and (k)(5)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Operators may deviate from steps not
labeled as RC by using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3527; email:
alan.pohl@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
57A1327, Revision 2, dated July 25, 2017.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
phone: 562–797–1717; internet: https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2019–02930 Filed 2–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0906; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–122–AD; Amendment
39–19561; AD 2019–03–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus SAS Model A310–304, –322,
–324, and –325 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by an evaluation by the
design approval holder (DAH)
indicating that certain wing skin
stringer joints are subject to widespread
fatigue damage (WFD). This AD requires
a rototest inspection of the fastener
holes in the affected areas and repair if
necessary, and modifying the fastener
holes. We are issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 29,
2019.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 29, 2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—
EAW, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No:
2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airwortheas@airbus.com; internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0906.
SUMMARY:
(l) Related Information
PO 00000
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
February 7, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Sfmt 4700
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5589-5592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02930]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0409; Product Identifier 2017-NM-120-AD; Amendment
39-19559; AD 2019-03-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-16-05,
which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C,
-800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. AD 2017-16-05 required a one-
time detailed visual inspection for discrepancies in the Krueger flap
bullnose attachment hardware, and related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. This AD adds airplanes and an additional
inspection to determine if any Krueger flap no. 1, 2, 3, or 4 has been
replaced, and related investigative and corrective actions. Since this
is a rotable parts issue, the applicability of this AD has been
expanded beyond the airplanes listed in the related service bulletin to
include all airplanes on which a Krueger flap bullnose may be
installed. This AD was prompted by a report of a Krueger flap bullnose
departing an airplane during taxi, which caused damage to the wing
structure and thrust reverser, and a report of a missing no. 2 Krueger
flap bullnose hinge bolt from an airplane that was not included in the
effectivity of AD 2017-16-05. We are issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 29, 2019.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 29,
2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; phone: 562-797-1717; internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0409.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0409; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West
[[Page 5590]]
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3527; email:
alan.pohl@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2017-16-05, Amendment 39-18982 (82 FR39344,
August 18, 2017) (``AD 2017-16-05''). AD 2017-16-05 applied to certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER
series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May 15,
2018 (83 FR22420). The NPRM was prompted by a report of a Krueger flap
bullnose departing an airplane during taxi, which caused damage to the
wing structure and thrust reverser, and a report of a missing no. 2
Krueger flap bullnose hinge bolt from an airplane that was not included
in the effectivity of AD 2017-16-05. The NPRM proposed to continue to
require a one-time detailed visual inspection for discrepancies in the
Krueger flap bullnose attachment hardware, and related investigative
and corrective actions, if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to add
airplanes and an additional inspection to determine if any Krueger flap
no. 1, 2, 3, or 4 has been replaced, and related investigative and
corrective actions. Since this is a rotable parts issue, the
applicability of this AD has been expanded beyond the airplanes listed
in the related service bulletin to include all airplanes on which a
Krueger flap bullnose may be installed. We are issuing this AD to
address missing Krueger flap bullnose hardware. Such missing hardware
could result in the Krueger flap bullnose departing the airplane during
flight, which could damage empennage structure and lead to the
inability to maintain continued safe flight and landing.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing concurred with the content of the NPRM. Delta Air Lines
(DAL) and American Airlines (AAL) concurred with the intent of the
NPRM.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the Supplemental
Type Certificate (STC) ST00830SE does not affect the actions specified
in the NPRM.
We concur with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of
the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and added paragraph
(c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC ST00830SE does not
affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD.
Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is installed, a
``change in product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval
request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR
39.17.
Request To Remove Airplanes From the Applicability
All Nippon Airways (ANA) requested that we remove the airplanes
identified in paragraph (c)(3) of the proposed AD. ANA stated that
those airplanes are not required to do the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD.
We disagree with the request. Although the airplanes identified in
paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this AD (paragraph (c)(3) of the proposed AD)
are not required to do the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this
AD, those airplanes must still comply with the parts installation
limitation specified in paragraph (i) of this AD. We have not changed
this AD in this regard.
Request for a Different Method of Compliance
DAL requested that we include an option in paragraph (i) of the
proposed AD to install the Krueger flap before accomplishing the
required actions. DAL mentioned that it has updated its manuals to
inspect after installation on the airplane, not prior to installation.
We agree that clarification is necessary. The required inspection
of the Krueger flap bullnose can only be accomplished after
installation on the Krueger flap assembly, either prior to or after
installation on the airplane. We have revised paragraph (i) to specify
that the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD must be
accomplished after installation but prior to further flight.
Request To Clarify Which Krueger Flaps Are Affected
DAL and AAL requested that we clarify paragraph (i) of the proposed
AD to specify affected Krueger flap(s) and Krueger flap bullnose(s).
DAL stated that not all four positions need to be inspected, only the
Krueger flap(s) and Krueger flap bullnose(s) being installed. AAL
suggested that we reword paragraph (i) of the proposed AD to improve
clarity.
We agree with the request because it is not necessary to perform
the actions specified in paragraph (i) of this AD on all four Krueger
flap(s) or Krueger flap bullnose(s). Only the Krueger flap(s) or
Krueger flap bullnose(s) being installed must be inspected. We have
revised paragraph (i) of this AD to specify: ``These actions are
required only for the Krueger flap(s) or Krueger flap bullnose(s) being
installed.''
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously, and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 2,
dated July 25, 2017. This service information describes procedures for
a one-time detailed visual inspection for discrepancies in the Krueger
flap bullnose attachment hardware, and related investigative and
corrective actions; and an inspection to determine if any Krueger flap
no. 1, 2, 3, or 4 has been replaced, and related investigative and
corrective actions. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1,814 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
[[Page 5591]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of the Krueger flap 3 work-hours x $85 per $0 $255 $381,225
bullnose hardware (1,495 airplanes) hour = $255.
(retained actions from AD 2017-16-05).
Inspection to determine if any Krueger 3 work-hours x $85 per 0 255 462,570
flap no. 1, 2, 3, or 4 has been hour = $255.
replaced (1,814 airplanes) (new
action).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all available costs in our
cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017-16-05, Amendment 39-18982 (82 FR 39344, August 18, 2017), and
adding the following new AD:
2019-03-07 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19559; Docket No. FAA-
2018-0409; Product Identifier 2017-NM-120-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective March 29, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2017-16-05, Amendment 39-18982 (82 FR 39344,
August 18, 2017) (``AD 2017-16-05'').
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -
700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in
any category, as specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through
(c)(1)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Airplanes in Groups 1 and 2 as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 2, dated July 25, 2017
(``BASB 737-57A1327, R2'').
(ii) Airplanes in Group 3, as identified in BASB 737-57A1327,
R2, except where this service bulletin specifies the groups as line
numbers 6422 through 6465 inclusive, this AD specifies those groups
as line number 6422 through any line number airplane with an
original Certificate of Airworthiness or an original Export
Certificate of Airworthiness dated on or before the effective date
of this AD.
(iii) All Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER
series airplanes with an original Certificate of Airworthiness or an
original Export Certificate of Airworthiness dated after the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00830SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE
is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with
the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of a Krueger flap bullnose
departing an airplane during taxi, which caused damage to the wing
structure and thrust reverser, and a report of a missing no. 2
Krueger flap bullnose hinge bolt from an airplane that was not
included in the effectivity of AD 2017-16-05. We are issuing this AD
to address missing Krueger flap bullnose hardware. Such missing
hardware could result in the Krueger flap bullnose departing the
airplane during flight, which could damage empennage structure and
lead to the inability to maintain continued safe flight and landing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (c)(1)(ii)
of this AD: Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
BASB 737-57A1327, R2, do all applicable actions identified as ``RC''
[[Page 5592]]
(required for compliance) in, and in accordance with, the
Accomplishment Instructions of BASB 737-57A1327, R2.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where BASB 737-57A1327, R2 uses the phrase ``the
original issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires
using September 22, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017-16-05).
(2) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where BASB 737-57A1327, R2 uses the phrase ``the
Revision 2 date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires using
``the effective date of this AD.''
(i) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
Krueger flap or Krueger flap bullnose on any airplane identified in
paragraph (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this AD, unless
the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD have been
accomplished on the Krueger flap bullnose after installation but
prior to further flight. These actions are required only for the
Krueger flap(s) or Krueger flap bullnose(s) being installed.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
September 22, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017-16-05), using
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, dated May 20, 2016.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD, using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
57A1327, Revision 1, dated September 28, 2016.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2017-16-05 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of BASB 737-57A1327, R2 that
are required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(5) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as RC, the provisions of paragraphs (k)(5)(i) and (k)(5)(ii) of this
AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Operators may deviate from steps not labeled as RC by using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the RC steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still
be done as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Alan Pohl,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3527;
email: alan.pohl@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1327, Revision 2, dated
July 25, 2017.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; phone: 562-797-1717; internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on February 7, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-02930 Filed 2-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P