Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola Beach, FL, 5354-5356 [2019-02843]
Download as PDF
5354
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
based on removing publicly available
internal Air Force policies and
procedures. The Air Force internal
policies and procedures are available on
the Air Force’s online publication site
(https://www.e-publishing.af.mil/).The
newest instructions, AFI 35–101, Public
Affairs, dated January 12, 2016, and AFI
35–109, Visual Information, June 1,
2017, provide the Air Force with needed
internal guidance in regards to the VI
documentation program. Additionally,
DoD Instructions 5040.02, Visual
Information (VI) (https://www.esd.
whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/
issuances/dodi/504002p.pdf?ver=201804-23-085110-153), and DoD Instruction
5040.07, Visual Information (VI)
Productions (https://www.esd.whs.mil/
Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/
dodi/504007p.pdf), and CJCS
Instruction 3205.01D, Joint Combat
Camera (COMCAM) (https://www.jcs.mil/
Portals/36/Documents/Library/
Instructions/3205_01.pdf?ver=2016-0205-175023-000) provide overarching
guidance.
This rule is not significant under
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’
therefore, E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ does not apply.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 813
criminal prosecution. The part
prescribes internal Air Force procedures
and command responsibilities and is
unnecessary.
This rule is effective on February
21, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Major Andrea M. Hunwick at 240–612–
4829.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It has been
determined that seeking public
comment on the removal of this CFR
part is impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on removing publicly available
internal Air Force policies and
procedures.
The Air Force policy is available on
the Air Force’s online publication site
(https://www.e-publishing.af.mil/). The
pertinent internal Air Force instruction
is currently numbered (AFI) 51–1001,
but it is in the process of being
renumbered and republished as AFI 51–
205.
This rule is not significant under
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’
therefore, E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ does not apply.
DATES:
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 884
Archives and records, Motion
pictures.
Courts, Government employees,
Intergovernmental relations, Law
enforcement, Military personnel.
PART 813—[REMOVED]
PART 884—[REMOVED]
■
Accordingly, by the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 813 is removed.
■
Henry Williams,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
Henry Williams,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–02947 Filed 2–20–19; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2019–02944 Filed 2–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Department of the Air Force
Accordingly, by the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 884 is removed.
Coast Guard
32 CFR Part 884
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket ID: USAF–2018–HQ–0008]
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0019]
RIN 0701–AA85
Delivery of Personnel to United States
Civilian Authorities for Trial
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DoD.
ACTION:
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay,
Pensacola Beach, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
Final rule.
ACTION:
This final rule removes the
Department of the Air Force’s regulation
concerning the delivery of military
personnel to U.S. civilian authorities for
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Feb 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
The Coast Guard establishes a
temporary safety zone for the navigable
waters within 100 yards from the center
span of the Pensacola Bay Bridge,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Pensacola Beach, FL. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to provide for
the safety of life and property on these
navigable waters during a bridge
construction project on the waterway.
Entry into or transiting in this zone is
prohibited to all vessels, mariners, and
persons unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from March
6, 2019, through March 9, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0019 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Kyle D. Berry, Sector
Mobile, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
251–441–5940, email Kyle.D.Berry@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. It is impracticable to
publish an NPRM because we must
establish this safety zone by March 6,
2019 and lack sufficient time to provide
a reasonable comment period and then
consider those comments before issuing
the rule. Delaying the rule would
compromise the safety measures
necessary to protect life and property
from possible hazards associated with
the bridge construction project.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule is contrary to public interest
because it would delay the safety
measures necessary to respond to
potential safety hazards associated with
this bridge construction project.
Immediate action is needed to protect
vessels and mariners from the safety
hazards associated with the bridge
construction project.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the bridge
construction project from March 6, 2019
through March 9, 2019 will be a safety
concern for any vessels and persons
within 100 yards of the center span of
the Pensacola Bay Bridge at, Pensacola
Beach, FL. This rule is needed to protect
the public, mariners, and vessels from
the potential hazards associated with
the bridge construction project on the
waterway.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone encompassing the
navigable waters within 100 yards of the
center span of the Pensacola Bay Bridge
in Pensacola, FL. The location and
duration of this safety zone is intended
to protect persons and vessels during
the bridge construction project that will
take place on this navigable waterway.
No person or vessel will be permitted to
enter or transit within the safety zone,
unless specifically authorized by the
COTP or a designated representative.
Public notifications will be made to the
local maritime community prior to the
event through Broadcast Notice to
Mariners (BNM). Mariners and other
members of the public may also contact
the COTP or designated representative
to inquire about the safety zone by
telephone at 251–441–5976.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protectors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Feb 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory determination is
based on the size, location, and duration
of the safety zone. This temporary safety
zone will only restrict navigation within
100 yards of the center span of the
Pensacola Bay Bridge in Pensacola, FL
for four days for power cable laying
during a bridge construction project.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) via
VHF–FM marine channel 15 and 16
about the zone, and the rule allows
vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small
entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5355
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
5356
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone that will prohibit entry thru the
Pensacola Bay Bridge at the center span
and 100 yards from it for four days. It
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev.01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
(REC) supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 229
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; area closure;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS is closing the Southern
Exclusion Zone (SEZ) to deep-set
longline fishing for all vessels registered
under the Hawaii longline limited
access program, as a result of the fishery
reaching the established annual trigger
of two observed false killer whale
mortalities or serious injuries (M&SI) in
the fishery within the U.S. Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) around Hawaii.
This action is necessary to comply with
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan
(Plan) regulations that establish the SEZ
closure trigger and procedures to limit
M&SI of false killer whales in the
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
DATES: Effective February 22, 2019.
NMFS must receive comments by
March 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2019–0005, by either of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
SUMMARY:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034; 46 U.S.C.
70051; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
160.5; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0019 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0019 Safety Zone; Pensacola
Bay Bridge, Pensacola Beach, FL.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; False
Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan;
Closure of Southern Exclusion Zone
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters within
100 yards of the vicinity of the
Pensacola Bay Bridge at the center span,
Pensacola Beach, FL.
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from March 6, 2019
through March 9, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in § 165.23 of this
part as well as the regulations in this
section apply to the safety zone.
(2) Entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a
designated representative.
Jkt 247001
[FR Doc. 2019–02843 Filed 2–20–19; 8:45 am]
RIN 0648–XG781
■
15:57 Feb 20, 2019
Dated: February 13, 2019.
M.R. McLellan,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Mobile.
[Docket No. 110131070–2626–02]
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(3) Persons or vessels seeking to enter
into or transit through the zone must
request permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF–FM channels 15 an16
or by telephone at 251–441–5976.(4) If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the COTP or designated
representative.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through
broadcast notices to mariners of the
enforcement period for the safety zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20190005. Click the ‘‘Comment Now’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Michael D. Tosatto, Regional
Administrator, NMFS Pacific Islands
Region (PIR), attention Kevin Brindock,
Protected Resources, 1845 Wasp Blvd.,
Bldg. 176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider
comments sent by any other method, to
any other address or individual, or
received after the end of the comment
period. All comments received are a
part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential
business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Brindock, Protected Resources,
NMFS Pacific Islands Regional Office,
808–725–5146, kevin.brindock@
noaa.gov; or Kristy Long, NMFS Office
of Protected Resources, 206–526–4792,
kristy.long@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The False
Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan (Plan)
was implemented on December 31,
2012, pursuant to section 118(f) of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) to reduce the level of
incidental M&SI of the Hawaii pelagic
and Hawaii insular stocks of false killer
whales in the Hawaii longline fisheries
(77 FR 71260; November 29, 2012). The
Plan, based on consensus
recommendations from the False Killer
Whale Take Reduction Team, was
implemented by regulations, which
included the creation of the SEZ that
would be closed to deep-set longline
fishing if a certain number (trigger) of
false killer whale M&SI are observed in
the deep-set fishery in the EEZ. As
described in the Plan regulations (50
CFR 229.37(d)(2)), the SEZ is bounded
on the east at 154°30′ W longitude, on
the west at 165° W longitude, on the
north by the boundaries of the Main
Hawaiian Islands Longline Fishing
Prohibited Area and
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National
Monument, and on the south by the EEZ
boundary (see Fig. 1). A SEZ closure is
triggered if, after expanding the number
of observed M&SI, the Hawaii pelagic
stock’s potential biological removal
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5354-5356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02843]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0019]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola Beach, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard establishes a temporary safety zone for the
navigable waters within 100 yards from the center span of the Pensacola
Bay Bridge, Pensacola Beach, FL. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of life and property on these
navigable waters during a bridge construction project on the waterway.
Entry into or transiting in this zone is prohibited to all vessels,
mariners, and persons unless specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from March 6, 2019, through March 9,
2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0019 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Kyle D. Berry, Sector Mobile, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 251-441-5940, email
Kyle.D.Berry@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish this safety
zone by March 6, 2019 and lack sufficient time to provide a reasonable
comment period and then consider those comments before issuing the
rule. Delaying the rule would compromise the safety measures necessary
to protect life and property from possible hazards associated with the
bridge construction project.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for
[[Page 5355]]
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule is contrary
to public interest because it would delay the safety measures necessary
to respond to potential safety hazards associated with this bridge
construction project. Immediate action is needed to protect vessels and
mariners from the safety hazards associated with the bridge
construction project.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the bridge construction project from
March 6, 2019 through March 9, 2019 will be a safety concern for any
vessels and persons within 100 yards of the center span of the
Pensacola Bay Bridge at, Pensacola Beach, FL. This rule is needed to
protect the public, mariners, and vessels from the potential hazards
associated with the bridge construction project on the waterway.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone
encompassing the navigable waters within 100 yards of the center span
of the Pensacola Bay Bridge in Pensacola, FL. The location and duration
of this safety zone is intended to protect persons and vessels during
the bridge construction project that will take place on this navigable
waterway. No person or vessel will be permitted to enter or transit
within the safety zone, unless specifically authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative. Public notifications will be made to the
local maritime community prior to the event through Broadcast Notice to
Mariners (BNM). Mariners and other members of the public may also
contact the COTP or designated representative to inquire about the
safety zone by telephone at 251-441-5976.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protectors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory determination is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. This temporary safety zone will only
restrict navigation within 100 yards of the center span of the
Pensacola Bay Bridge in Pensacola, FL for four days for power cable
laying during a bridge construction project. Moreover, the Coast Guard
will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) via VHF-FM marine
channel 15 and 16 about the zone, and the rule allows vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the
[[Page 5356]]
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule involves a safety zone that will prohibit
entry thru the Pensacola Bay Bridge at the center span and 100 yards
from it for four days. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev.01. A Record of Environmental Consideration (REC)
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034; 46 U.S.C. 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0019 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0019 Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay Bridge, Pensacola Beach,
FL.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters within 100 yards of the vicinity of the Pensacola Bay Bridge at
the center span, Pensacola Beach, FL.
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from March 6,
2019 through March 9, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in Sec.
165.23 of this part as well as the regulations in this section apply to
the safety zone.
(2) Entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a designated
representative.
(3) Persons or vessels seeking to enter into or transit through the
zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM channels 15 an16 or by
telephone at 251-441-5976.(4) If permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the instructions of the COTP or designated
representative.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to
mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone.
Dated: February 13, 2019.
M.R. McLellan,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2019-02843 Filed 2-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P