Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Termination of Assessments, 4951-4953 [2019-02775]
Download as PDF
4951
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 34
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1208
[Document Number AMS–SC–18–0093]
Processed Raspberry Promotion,
Research, and Information Order;
Termination of Assessments
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule removes the
requirement in the Processed Raspberry
Promotion, Research, and Information
Order (Order) that each eligible
producer of raspberries for processing
and eligible importer of processed
raspberries pay to the National
Processed Raspberry Council (Council)
an assessment in the amount of one cent
per pound as specified in the Order. The
remaining provisions of the Order and
regulations issued thereunder will
terminated at a later date. This action is
necessary because termination of the
Order was favored by a majority of the
eligible producers and eligible importers
voting in a referendum conducted from
September 10 through October 5, 2018.
DATES: Effective date: February 21, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hakim Fobia, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room
1406–S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC
20250–0244, telephone: (202) 720–9915;
(202) 720–4835; facsimile: (202) 205–
2800; or electronic mail: Hakim.Fobia@
ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule affecting 7 CFR part 1208 is
authorized under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411–
7425). The Processed Raspberry
Promotion, Research, and Information
Order is codified at 7 CFR part 1208.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
Prior documents in this proceeding:
Continuance Referendum, July 25, 2018
[83 FR 35153]; Processed Raspberry
Promotion, Research, and Information
Order, May 8, 2012 [77 FR 26911]; and
Referendum Procedures, February 8,
2010 [75 FR 6089].
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules and promoting
flexibility. This final rule falls within a
category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because
this rule does not meet the definition of
a significant regulatory action it does
not trigger the requirements contained
in Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this rule will not have substantial and
direct effects on Tribal governments and
will not have significant Tribal
implications.
Executive Order 12988
In addition, this final rule has been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended
to have retroactive effect. Section 524 of
the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides
that it shall not affect or preempt any
other State or Federal law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7
U.S.C. 7418), a person subject to an
order may file a written petition with
USDA stating that an order, any
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order, is
not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an
order or an exemption from an order.
Any petition filed challenging an order,
any provision of an order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
an order, shall be filed within two years
after the effective date of an order,
provision, or obligation subject to
challenge in the petition. The petitioner
will have the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. Thereafter, USDA will
issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996
Act provides that the district court of
the United States for any district in
which the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if
the petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling.
Background
This final rule terminates Order
requirements to pay an assessment as
prescribed in § 1208.52 of the Order and
section 517 of the 1996 Act. The 1996
Act authorizes a national processed
raspberry promotion, research, and
information program. In accordance
with the 1996 Act, USDA developed
and implemented the Order (7 CFR
1208.1–1208.520), which became
effective on May 9, 2012.
Section 518(c) of the 1996 Act (7
U.S.C. 7417(c)), and section 1208.71(b)
of the Order provide that the Secretary
of Agriculture (Secretary) shall conduct
a subsequent referendum among people
subject to assessments. The Order states
that subsequent referenda will be held
every 7 years to determine whether
producers of raspberries for processing
and importers of processed raspberries
favor continuance of the Order. A
referendum also may be held by request
of 10 percent or more of eligible voters,
by request of the council established by
the order, or when the Secretary deems
it necessary. The Order shall continue if
it is favored by a majority of producers
and importers voting in the referendum,
who during a representative period,
have been engaged in the production or
importation of processed raspberries.
In March 2018, USDA received a
petition requesting a referendum from
more than the required 10 percent of
eligible producers of raspberries for
processing and importers of processed
E:\FR\FM\20FER1.SGM
20FER1
4952
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
raspberries. As such, a referendum was
held from September 10 through
October 5, 2018. The representative
period for establishing voter eligibility
was January 1 through December 31,
2017. Persons who grew 20,000 pounds
or more of raspberries for processing in
the United States or imported 20,000
pounds or more of processed raspberries
into the United States during the
representative period and were subject
to assessment during the representative
period were eligible to vote. Notice of
the referendum was published in the
Federal Register on July 25, 2018 (83 FR
35153). Termination of the Order was
favored by 57 percent of the eligible
producers and importers voting in the
referendum.
Section 522 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C.
7421) and § 1208.72 of the Order
provides that, if the Secretary
determines that termination of the Order
is favored by a majority of all the votes
cast in a referendum, the Secretary shall
terminate, as appropriate the collection
of assessments under the Order not later
than 180 days after the referendum
results are announced. Further, the
Secretary is required to terminate, as
appropriate, activities under the Order
as soon as practicable and in an orderly
manner. A separate rule will be
published in the future in the Federal
Register terminating the remaining
Order requirements and provisions.
In accordance with section 1208.73,
the Council will recommend not more
than three of its members to the
Secretary to serve as trustees for
purposes of liquidating the assets of the
Council.
According to section 1208.74,
termination of the Order and any of its
provisions, including the requirements
to pay assessments shall not:
(a) Affect or waive any right, duty,
obligation, or liability which shall have
arisen or which may thereafter arise in
connection with any provisions of part
1208; or
(b) Release or extinguish any violation
of part 1208; or
(c) Affect or impair any rights or
remedies of the United States, or the
Secretary, or any other person with
respect to any such violation.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS
is required to examine the economic
impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has considered the
economic impact of this action on such
entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small
Business Administration (SBA) defines,
in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural
producers as those having annual
receipts of no more than $750,000 and
small agricultural service firms
(handlers and importers) as those
having annual receipts of no more than
$7.5 million.
According to the Council, it is
estimated that there are 160 producers
of raspberries for processing and 30 first
handlers of raspberries for processing in
the United States. Dividing the
processed raspberry crop value for 2017
reported by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) of
$102,691,456 1 by the number of
producers yields an annual average
producer revenue of $641,821. It is
estimated that 75 percent of first
handlers shipped under $7.5 million
worth of processed raspberries.
Likewise, based on U.S. Customs data,
it is estimated there are 136 importers
of processed raspberries. Using 2017
Customs data, nearly all importers, or 99
percent, import less than $7.5 million
worth of processed raspberries annually.
Thus, the majority of domestic
producers, first handlers, and importers
of processed raspberries would be
considered small entities.
Regarding the value of the
commodity, as mentioned above, based
on 2017 NASS data, the value of the
domestic crop was about $102 million.
According to U.S. Customs data, the
value of 2017 imports was about $55
million.
According to the Council, in 2017
there were 202 eligible producers and
importers who paid about $1.2 million
in assessments. When the Order was
published in the Federal Register on
May 8, 2012, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) stated that an
anticipated $1.2 million of assessments
would be collected from about 245
eligible entities. The assessment rate
currently is one cent per pound of
processed raspberries. This is the same
rate that was set when the program first
started. This rule terminates the
requirement for eligible producers and
importers to pay assessments.
The Order provides for
reimbursements of assessments under
certain conditions. Therefore, the exact
economic impact of this action will take
into account the amount of
reimbursement of assessments
1 Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2017 Summary, June
2018, USDA, National Agricultural Statistics
Service, pg. 83.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
producers and importers request from
the Council.
This action will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either large or small
producers or importers of processed
raspberries.
The Department has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Order
It is therefore ordered, that the terms
and provisions of Subpart A of part
1208 that require eligible producers and
importers to pay an assessment to
finance the national program for
processed raspberry promotion,
research, and information Order (7 CFR
part 1208) are hereby terminated.
It is also found and determined upon
good cause that it is impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice or to
engage in further public procedure prior
to putting this action into effect, and
that good cause exists for not
postponing the effective date of this
action until 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register because: (1) This
action relieves each eligible producer
and importer from the burden to remit
assessments; (2) termination of the
Order was favored by a majority of
eligible producers and importers voting
in the referendum; and (3) the 1996 Act
and Order require that, upon such a
determination by referendum, collection
of assessments should terminate no later
than 180 days after the results are
announced.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1208
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements,
Raspberry promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 1208 is amended
as follows:
PART 1208—PROCESSED
RASPBERRY PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
ORDER
Subpart A—Processed Raspberry
Promotion, Research, and Information
Order
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1208 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
2. A note is added to § 1208.52 to read
as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\20FER1.SGM
20FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1208.52
*
*
Assessments.
*
*
*
Note 1 to § 1208.52: The requirement to
pay assessments is terminated as of February
21, 2019.
Dated: February 14, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–02775 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Parts 22 and 172
[Docket ID OCC–2014–0016]
RIN 1557–AD84
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 208
[Regulation H, Docket No. R–1498]
RIN 7100 AE–22
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 339
RIN 3064–AE50
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 614
RIN 3052–AC93
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 760
RIN 3133–AE64
Loans in Areas Having Special Flood
Hazards
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury; Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System; Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation; Farm
Credit Administration; National Credit
Union Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC), the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board), the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Farm
Credit Administration (FCA), and the
National Credit Union Administration
(NCUA) are amending their regulations
regarding loans in areas having special
flood hazards to implement the private
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
flood insurance provisions of the
Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform
Act of 2012 (Biggert-Waters Act).
Specifically, the final rule requires
regulated lending institutions to accept
policies that meet the statutory
definition of ‘‘private flood insurance’’
in the Biggert-Waters Act; and permits
regulated lending institutions to
exercise their discretion to accept flood
insurance policies issued by private
insurers and plans providing flood
coverage issued by mutual aid societies
that do not meet the statutory definition
of ‘‘private flood insurance,’’ subject to
certain restrictions.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 1,
2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Rhonda L. Daniels, Compliance
Specialist, Compliance Policy Division,
(202) 649–5405; Sadia Chaudhary,
Counsel, (202) 649–6350, Heidi M.
Thomas, Special Counsel, or Melissa
Lisenbee, Senior Attorney, (202) 649–
5490, Chief Counsel’s Office. For
persons who are hearing impaired, TTY,
(202) 649–5597.
Board: Lanette Meister, Senior
Supervisory Consumer Financial
Services Analyst, (202) 452–2705;
Vivian W. Wong, Senior Counsel, (202)
452–3667, Division of Consumer and
Community Affairs; or Daniel Ericson,
Senior Counsel, (202) 452–3359, Legal
Division; for users of
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) only, contact (202) 263–4869.
FDIC: Simin Ho, Senior Policy
Analyst, Division of Depositor and
Consumer Protection, (202) 898–6907,
sho@fdic.gov; Navid Choudhury,
Counsel, Consumer Compliance Unit,
Legal Division, nchoudnury@fdic.gov
(202) 898–6526.
FCA: Paul K. Gibbs, Associate
Director, Office of Regulatory Policy
(703) 883–4203, TTY (703) 883–4056; or
Mary Alice Donner, Senior Counsel,
Office of General Counsel (703) 883–
4020, TTY (703) 883–4056.
NCUA: Sarah Chung, Senior Staff
Attorney, or Thomas Zells, Staff
Attorney, Office of General Counsel,
(703) 518–6540; or Jeff Marshall, Policy
Officer, (703) 518–6360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Flood Insurance Statutes
The National Flood Insurance Act of
1968 (1968 Act) 1 and the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (FDPA),2 as
amended, (collectively referenced
herein as the Federal flood insurance
1 Public
2 Public
PO 00000
Law 90–448, 82 Stat. 572 (1968).
Law 93–234, 87 Stat. 975 (1973).
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4953
statutes) govern the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP).3 These laws
make Federally subsidized flood
insurance available to owners of
improved real estate or mobile homes
located in participating communities
and require the purchase of flood
insurance in connection with a loan
made by a regulated lending
institution 4 when the loan is secured by
improved real estate or a mobile home
located in a special flood hazard area
(SFHA) 5 in which flood insurance is
available under the NFIP. The laws
specify the amount of insurance that
must be purchased, and also require
such insurance be maintained for the
term of the loan. (The requirement for
flood insurance, and the term and
amounts of such coverage, are
hereinafter described as ‘‘the flood
insurance purchase requirement.’’) The
OCC, Board, FDIC, FCA, and NCUA
(collectively, the Agencies) each have
issued regulations implementing these
statutory requirements for the lending
institutions they supervise.6
The Biggert-Waters Act 7 amends the
Federal flood insurance statutes that the
Agencies have authority to implement
and enforce. Among other things, the
Biggert-Waters Act: (1) Requires the
Agencies to issue a rule regarding the
escrow of premiums and fees for flood
insurance; 8 (2) clarifies the requirement
to force place insurance; 9 and (3)
requires the Agencies to issue a rule to
direct regulated lending institutions to
accept ‘‘private flood insurance,’’ as
defined by the Biggert-Waters Act, and
to notify borrowers of the availability of
3 These statutes are codified at 42 U.S.C. 4001–
4129. The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) administers the NFIP; its regulations
implementing the NFIP appear at 44 CFR parts 59–
77.
4 The FDPA defines ‘‘regulated lending
institution’’ to mean any bank, savings and loan
association, credit union, farm credit bank, Federal
land bank association, production credit
association, or similar institution subject to the
supervision of a Federal entity for lending
regulation. 42 U.S.C. 4003(a)(1).
5 An SFHA is an area within a flood plain having
a one percent or greater chance of flood occurrence
in any given year. 44 CFR 59.1. SFHAs are
delineated on maps issued by FEMA for individual
communities. 44 CFR part 65. A community
establishes its eligibility to participate in the NFIP
by adopting and enforcing flood plain management
measures that regulate new construction and by
making substantial improvements within its SFHAs
to eliminate or minimize future flood damage. 44
CFR part 60.
6 See 12 CFR part 22 (OCC), part 208 (Board), part
339 (FDIC), part 614 Subpart S (FCA), and part 760
(NCUA).
7 Public Law 112–141, 126 Stat. 916 (2012).
8 Section 100209 of the Biggert-Waters Act,
amending section 102(d) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C.
4012a(d)).
9 Section 100244 of the Biggert-Waters Act,
amending section 102(e) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C.
4012a(e)).
E:\FR\FM\20FER1.SGM
20FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4951-4953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02775]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 4951]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1208
[Document Number AMS-SC-18-0093]
Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order;
Termination of Assessments
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule removes the requirement in the Processed Raspberry
Promotion, Research, and Information Order (Order) that each eligible
producer of raspberries for processing and eligible importer of
processed raspberries pay to the National Processed Raspberry Council
(Council) an assessment in the amount of one cent per pound as
specified in the Order. The remaining provisions of the Order and
regulations issued thereunder will terminated at a later date. This
action is necessary because termination of the Order was favored by a
majority of the eligible producers and eligible importers voting in a
referendum conducted from September 10 through October 5, 2018.
DATES: Effective date: February 21, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hakim Fobia, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 1406-S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC
20250-0244, telephone: (202) 720-9915; (202) 720-4835; facsimile: (202)
205-2800; or electronic mail: Hakim.Fobia@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule affecting 7 CFR part 1208 is
authorized under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act
of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425). The Processed Raspberry
Promotion, Research, and Information Order is codified at 7 CFR part
1208.
Prior documents in this proceeding: Continuance Referendum, July
25, 2018 [83 FR 35153]; Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and
Information Order, May 8, 2012 [77 FR 26911]; and Referendum
Procedures, February 8, 2010 [75 FR 6089].
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules and promoting flexibility.
This final rule falls within a category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory action it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this rule will
not have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will
not have significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
In addition, this final rule has been reviewed under Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have
retroactive effect. Section 524 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423)
provides that it shall not affect or preempt any other State or Federal
law authorizing promotion or research relating to an agricultural
commodity.
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7418), a person subject
to an order may file a written petition with USDA stating that an
order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an order or an exemption from an
order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be
filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision,
or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, USDA
will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act provides that the
district court of the United States for any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of USDA's final ruling.
Background
This final rule terminates Order requirements to pay an assessment
as prescribed in Sec. 1208.52 of the Order and section 517 of the 1996
Act. The 1996 Act authorizes a national processed raspberry promotion,
research, and information program. In accordance with the 1996 Act,
USDA developed and implemented the Order (7 CFR 1208.1-1208.520), which
became effective on May 9, 2012.
Section 518(c) of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7417(c)), and section
1208.71(b) of the Order provide that the Secretary of Agriculture
(Secretary) shall conduct a subsequent referendum among people subject
to assessments. The Order states that subsequent referenda will be held
every 7 years to determine whether producers of raspberries for
processing and importers of processed raspberries favor continuance of
the Order. A referendum also may be held by request of 10 percent or
more of eligible voters, by request of the council established by the
order, or when the Secretary deems it necessary. The Order shall
continue if it is favored by a majority of producers and importers
voting in the referendum, who during a representative period, have been
engaged in the production or importation of processed raspberries.
In March 2018, USDA received a petition requesting a referendum
from more than the required 10 percent of eligible producers of
raspberries for processing and importers of processed
[[Page 4952]]
raspberries. As such, a referendum was held from September 10 through
October 5, 2018. The representative period for establishing voter
eligibility was January 1 through December 31, 2017. Persons who grew
20,000 pounds or more of raspberries for processing in the United
States or imported 20,000 pounds or more of processed raspberries into
the United States during the representative period and were subject to
assessment during the representative period were eligible to vote.
Notice of the referendum was published in the Federal Register on July
25, 2018 (83 FR 35153). Termination of the Order was favored by 57
percent of the eligible producers and importers voting in the
referendum.
Section 522 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7421) and Sec. 1208.72 of
the Order provides that, if the Secretary determines that termination
of the Order is favored by a majority of all the votes cast in a
referendum, the Secretary shall terminate, as appropriate the
collection of assessments under the Order not later than 180 days after
the referendum results are announced. Further, the Secretary is
required to terminate, as appropriate, activities under the Order as
soon as practicable and in an orderly manner. A separate rule will be
published in the future in the Federal Register terminating the
remaining Order requirements and provisions.
In accordance with section 1208.73, the Council will recommend not
more than three of its members to the Secretary to serve as trustees
for purposes of liquidating the assets of the Council.
According to section 1208.74, termination of the Order and any of
its provisions, including the requirements to pay assessments shall
not:
(a) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which
shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any
provisions of part 1208; or
(b) Release or extinguish any violation of part 1208; or
(c) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the United States,
or the Secretary, or any other person with respect to any such
violation.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), AMS is required to examine the economic impact of this rule on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on such entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration (SBA)
defines, in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those
having annual receipts of no more than $750,000 and small agricultural
service firms (handlers and importers) as those having annual receipts
of no more than $7.5 million.
According to the Council, it is estimated that there are 160
producers of raspberries for processing and 30 first handlers of
raspberries for processing in the United States. Dividing the processed
raspberry crop value for 2017 reported by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) of $102,691,456 \1\ by the number of
producers yields an annual average producer revenue of $641,821. It is
estimated that 75 percent of first handlers shipped under $7.5 million
worth of processed raspberries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2017 Summary, June 2018, USDA,
National Agricultural Statistics Service, pg. 83.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise, based on U.S. Customs data, it is estimated there are 136
importers of processed raspberries. Using 2017 Customs data, nearly all
importers, or 99 percent, import less than $7.5 million worth of
processed raspberries annually. Thus, the majority of domestic
producers, first handlers, and importers of processed raspberries would
be considered small entities.
Regarding the value of the commodity, as mentioned above, based on
2017 NASS data, the value of the domestic crop was about $102 million.
According to U.S. Customs data, the value of 2017 imports was about $55
million.
According to the Council, in 2017 there were 202 eligible producers
and importers who paid about $1.2 million in assessments. When the
Order was published in the Federal Register on May 8, 2012, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) stated that an anticipated $1.2
million of assessments would be collected from about 245 eligible
entities. The assessment rate currently is one cent per pound of
processed raspberries. This is the same rate that was set when the
program first started. This rule terminates the requirement for
eligible producers and importers to pay assessments.
The Order provides for reimbursements of assessments under certain
conditions. Therefore, the exact economic impact of this action will
take into account the amount of reimbursement of assessments producers
and importers request from the Council.
This action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either large or small producers or
importers of processed raspberries.
The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Order
It is therefore ordered, that the terms and provisions of Subpart A
of part 1208 that require eligible producers and importers to pay an
assessment to finance the national program for processed raspberry
promotion, research, and information Order (7 CFR part 1208) are hereby
terminated.
It is also found and determined upon good cause that it is
impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest to give
preliminary notice or to engage in further public procedure prior to
putting this action into effect, and that good cause exists for not
postponing the effective date of this action until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because: (1) This action relieves
each eligible producer and importer from the burden to remit
assessments; (2) termination of the Order was favored by a majority of
eligible producers and importers voting in the referendum; and (3) the
1996 Act and Order require that, upon such a determination by
referendum, collection of assessments should terminate no later than
180 days after the results are announced.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1208
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements, Raspberry promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1208 is
amended as follows:
PART 1208--PROCESSED RASPBERRY PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
ORDER
Subpart A--Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information
Order
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1208 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. A note is added to Sec. 1208.52 to read as follows:
[[Page 4953]]
Sec. 1208.52 Assessments.
* * * * *
Note 1 to Sec. 1208.52: The requirement to pay assessments is
terminated as of February 21, 2019.
Dated: February 14, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-02775 Filed 2-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P