List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment Nos. 11 and 12, 4684-4685 [2019-02593]
Download as PDF
4684
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘CONCRETE CASK Heat Removal
System.’’
In the direct final rule, the NRC stated
that if no significant adverse comments
were received, the direct final rule
would become effective on March 4,
2019. As described more fully in the
direct final rule, a significant adverse
comment is a comment where the
commenter explains why the rule would
be inappropriate, including challenges
to the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. Because
no significant adverse comments were
received, the direct final rule will
become effective as scheduled.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of February 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy K. Bladey,
Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking
Support Branch, Division of Rulemaking,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2019–02599 Filed 2–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
[NRC–2018–0221]
RIN 3150–AK18
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: Holtec International HI–STORM
100 Multipurpose Canister Cask
System, Certificate of Compliance No.
1014, Amendment Nos. 11 and 12
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is confirming the
effective date of February 25, 2019, for
the direct final rule that was published
in the Federal Register on December 12,
2018. This direct final rule amended the
NRC’s spent fuel storage regulations by
revising the Holtec International HI–
STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask
System (HI–STORM 100 System) listing
within the ‘‘List of approved spent fuel
storage casks’’ to include Amendment
Nos. 11 and 12 to Certificate of
Compliance No. 1014. Amendment Nos.
11 and 12 revise multiple items in the
technical specifications for multipurpose canister models listed under
Certificate of Compliance No. 1014;
most of these revisions involve changes
to the authorized contents. In addition,
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Feb 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
Amendment No. 11 makes several other
editorial changes.
DATES: The effective date of February
25, 2019, for the direct final rule
published December 12, 2018 (83 FR
63794), is confirmed.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2018–0221 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this action. You may
obtain publicly-available information
related to this action by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0221. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The proposed amendments to
the certificate, the proposed changes to
the technical specifications, and the
preliminary safety evaluation reports are
available in ADAMS for Amendment
No. 11 under Accession No.
ML18141A560 and Amendment No. 12
under Accession No. ML18087A055.
The final amendments to the certificate,
final changes to the technical
specifications, and final safety
evaluation reports can also be viewed in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML18355A369.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: YenJu Chen, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards; telephone: 301–
415–1018; email: Yen-Ju.Chen@nrc.gov
or Vanessa Cox, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards;
telephone: 301–415–8342; email:
Vanessa.Cox@nrc.gov. Both are staff of
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 12, 2018 (83 FR 63794), the
NRC published a direct final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
amending its regulations in part 72 of
title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) to the HI–STORM
100 System listing within the ‘‘List of
approved spent fuel storage casks’’ to
include Amendment Nos. 11 and 12 to
Certificate of Compliance No. 1014.
Amendment Nos. 11 and 12 revise
multiple items in the technical
specifications for multi-purpose canister
models listed under Certificate of
Compliance No. 1014; most of these
revisions involve changes to the
authorized contents. In addition,
Amendment No. 11 makes several other
editorial changes.
In the direct final rule, the NRC stated
that if no significant adverse comments
were received, the direct final rule
would become effective on February 25,
2019. As described more fully in the
direct final rule, a significant adverse
comment is a comment where the
commenter explains why the rule would
be inappropriate, including challenges
to the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change.
The NRC received two comments and
has determined that they are not
significant adverse comments. One
comment questioned the short-term
economic gains. As this rulemaking
only addressed changes to the technical
specifications for dry shielded canisters
used to store nuclear waste on-site, the
NRC determined this comment to be out
of scope of this direct final rule. The
second comment concerned specific
casks used at a reactor site, a direct final
rule for another storage cask, and
another cask that is the subject of an
NRC enforcement action. These issues
are also outside the scope of this direct
final rule.
The second commenter also stated
that the environmental assessment for
this direct final rule did not consider
the effects of certain natural
phenomena. Pursuant to 10 CFR part 72,
the NRC requires that an applicant for
a spent fuel storage system provide the
design bases, design criteria, and the
margins of safety for the system in its
safety analysis. The design bases, design
criteria, and safety margins include
consideration of applicable natural
phenomena. In its review, the NRC
determined that the cask system is
designed to mitigate the effects of design
basis accidents, including humaninduced and the most severe natural
phenomena. Specifically, in considering
design requirements for each accident
condition, the NRC evaluates whether
the design would prevent loss of
confinement, shielding, and criticality
control in the event of an accident. The
NRC identified a broad range of natural
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
hazards and accidents that were
considered in the environmental
assessment for this direct final rule.
Further, the safety evaluation report for
the Holtec International HI–STORM 100
Cask System (ADAMS Accession No.
ML003711865; May 4, 2000) identified
all accident-level events and conditions,
which are Design Events III and IV as
defined in American National Standard
Institute/American Nuclear Society
57.9–1984. These include natural
phenomena and human-induced lowprobability events such as those listed
in Comment 2. The NRC determined in
the May 4, 2000, safety evaluation
report that all potential safety
consequences were considered.
This direct final rule makes changes
to the technical specifications of
Certificate of Compliance No. 1014 for
the HI–STORM 100 Cask System.
However, this direct final rule makes
limited and routine changes; it does not
involve significant changes to the design
or the fabrication of the cask system.
The second comment does not raise
specific safety concerns regarding the
changes made in this direct final rule.
The second comment did not propose a
specific change or an addition that
could be incorporated into this direct
final rule and did not raise a relevant
issue not previously addressed by the
NRC. Accordingly, the second comment
does not meet the criteria of a
significant adverse comment. Because
no significant adverse comments were
received, this direct final rule will
become effective as scheduled.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of February 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy K. Bladey,
Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking
Support Branch, Division of Rulemaking,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2019–02593 Filed 2–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0647; Product
Identifier 2017–SW–083–AD; Amendment
39–19557; AD 2019–03–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada Limited
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Feb 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
ACTION:
Final rule.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada Limited
(Bell) Model 429 helicopters. This AD
revises the life limit for the nose landing
gear (NLG) assembly. This AD was
prompted by revised airworthiness
limitations determined by Bell. The
actions of this AD are intended to
prevent an unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 26,
2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada Limited,
12,800 Rue de l’Avenir, Mirabel, Quebec
J7J1R4; telephone (450) 437–2862 or
(800) 363–8023; fax (450) 433–0272; or
at https://www.bellcustomer.com/files/.
You may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0647; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this AD, the
Transport Canada AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations (phone: 800–647–
5527) is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft
Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email
matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On July 19, 2018, at 83 FR 34074, the
Federal Register published our notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
adding an AD that would apply to Bell
Model 429 helicopters with a NLG
assembly part number (P/N) 429–336–
100–101 installed. The NPRM proposed
to revise the life limit for the NLG
assembly. The proposed requirements
were intended to prevent fatigue failure
of an NLG assembly, which could result
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4685
in subsequent damage to and loss of
control of the helicopter.
The NPRM was prompted by
Canadian AD No. CF–2016–07, dated
March 4, 2016, to correct an unsafe
condition for Bell Model 429 helicopters
with wheeled landing gear. Transport
Canada, which is the aviation authority
for Canada, issued its AD after Bell
replaced the airworthiness limitations
for the NLG main fitting to bell crank
bolt P/N M084–20H125–101 and NLG
main fitting P/N M084–20H011–107
with an airworthiness limitation for the
next higher assembly, NLG assembly P/
N 429–336–100–101. According to
Transport Canada, the NLG assembly’s
life limit is reduced to 50,000 retirement
index number (RIN) or 4,500 hours
time-in-service. Transport Canada
advises that failure to replace
components prior to established
airworthiness limitations could result in
an unsafe condition.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD, but
we received no comments on the NPRM.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of Canada and
are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Canada, Transport
Canada, its technical representative, has
notified us of the unsafe condition
described in the Transport Canada AD.
We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by
Transport Canada and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs and that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as
proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
Transport Canada AD
The Transport Canada AD applies to
certain serial-numbered helicopters,
whereas this AD applies to all Bell
Model 429 helicopters with the affected
NLG assembly installed.
Related Service Information
We reviewed Bell Alert Service
Bulletin No. 429–15–24, Revision A,
dated September 23, 2015, which
specifies updating the Bell 429
maintenance manual with Revision 24
to incorporate the revised airworthiness
limitations for the NLG assembly, NLG
main fitting to bellcrank bolt, and the
NLG main fitting.
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4684-4685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02593]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
[NRC-2018-0221]
RIN 3150-AK18
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Holtec International
HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, Certificate of
Compliance No. 1014, Amendment Nos. 11 and 12
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is confirming the
effective date of February 25, 2019, for the direct final rule that was
published in the Federal Register on December 12, 2018. This direct
final rule amended the NRC's spent fuel storage regulations by revising
the Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System
(HI-STORM 100 System) listing within the ``List of approved spent fuel
storage casks'' to include Amendment Nos. 11 and 12 to Certificate of
Compliance No. 1014. Amendment Nos. 11 and 12 revise multiple items in
the technical specifications for multi-purpose canister models listed
under Certificate of Compliance No. 1014; most of these revisions
involve changes to the authorized contents. In addition, Amendment No.
11 makes several other editorial changes.
DATES: The effective date of February 25, 2019, for the direct final
rule published December 12, 2018 (83 FR 63794), is confirmed.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0221 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may
obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of
the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0221. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The proposed amendments to the
certificate, the proposed changes to the technical specifications, and
the preliminary safety evaluation reports are available in ADAMS for
Amendment No. 11 under Accession No. ML18141A560 and Amendment No. 12
under Accession No. ML18087A055. The final amendments to the
certificate, final changes to the technical specifications, and final
safety evaluation reports can also be viewed in ADAMS under Accession
No. ML18355A369.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yen-Ju Chen, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards; telephone: 301-415-1018; email: Yen-Ju.Chen@nrc.gov or Vanessa Cox, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards; telephone: 301-415-8342; email: Vanessa.Cox@nrc.gov. Both
are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 12, 2018 (83 FR 63794), the NRC
published a direct final rule amending its regulations in part 72 of
title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) to the HI-STORM
100 System listing within the ``List of approved spent fuel storage
casks'' to include Amendment Nos. 11 and 12 to Certificate of
Compliance No. 1014. Amendment Nos. 11 and 12 revise multiple items in
the technical specifications for multi-purpose canister models listed
under Certificate of Compliance No. 1014; most of these revisions
involve changes to the authorized contents. In addition, Amendment No.
11 makes several other editorial changes.
In the direct final rule, the NRC stated that if no significant
adverse comments were received, the direct final rule would become
effective on February 25, 2019. As described more fully in the direct
final rule, a significant adverse comment is a comment where the
commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including
challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be
ineffective or unacceptable without a change.
The NRC received two comments and has determined that they are not
significant adverse comments. One comment questioned the short-term
economic gains. As this rulemaking only addressed changes to the
technical specifications for dry shielded canisters used to store
nuclear waste on-site, the NRC determined this comment to be out of
scope of this direct final rule. The second comment concerned specific
casks used at a reactor site, a direct final rule for another storage
cask, and another cask that is the subject of an NRC enforcement
action. These issues are also outside the scope of this direct final
rule.
The second commenter also stated that the environmental assessment
for this direct final rule did not consider the effects of certain
natural phenomena. Pursuant to 10 CFR part 72, the NRC requires that an
applicant for a spent fuel storage system provide the design bases,
design criteria, and the margins of safety for the system in its safety
analysis. The design bases, design criteria, and safety margins include
consideration of applicable natural phenomena. In its review, the NRC
determined that the cask system is designed to mitigate the effects of
design basis accidents, including human-induced and the most severe
natural phenomena. Specifically, in considering design requirements for
each accident condition, the NRC evaluates whether the design would
prevent loss of confinement, shielding, and criticality control in the
event of an accident. The NRC identified a broad range of natural
[[Page 4685]]
hazards and accidents that were considered in the environmental
assessment for this direct final rule. Further, the safety evaluation
report for the Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Cask System (ADAMS
Accession No. ML003711865; May 4, 2000) identified all accident-level
events and conditions, which are Design Events III and IV as defined in
American National Standard Institute/American Nuclear Society 57.9-
1984. These include natural phenomena and human-induced low-probability
events such as those listed in Comment 2. The NRC determined in the May
4, 2000, safety evaluation report that all potential safety
consequences were considered.
This direct final rule makes changes to the technical
specifications of Certificate of Compliance No. 1014 for the HI-STORM
100 Cask System. However, this direct final rule makes limited and
routine changes; it does not involve significant changes to the design
or the fabrication of the cask system. The second comment does not
raise specific safety concerns regarding the changes made in this
direct final rule. The second comment did not propose a specific change
or an addition that could be incorporated into this direct final rule
and did not raise a relevant issue not previously addressed by the NRC.
Accordingly, the second comment does not meet the criteria of a
significant adverse comment. Because no significant adverse comments
were received, this direct final rule will become effective as
scheduled.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of February 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy K. Bladey,
Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking Support Branch, Division of
Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2019-02593 Filed 2-15-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P