Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Amendments Related to General Solicitations (DFARS Case 2018-D021), 4364-4366 [2019-02527]
Download as PDF
4364
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
212.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) Use the clause at 252.204–7004,
Antiterrorism Awareness Training for
Contractors, as prescribed in 204.7203.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
As prescribed in 204.7203, use the
following clause:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Level I Antiterrorism Awareness Training
for Contractors (FEB 2019)
(a) Definition. As used in this clause—
Military installation means a base, camp,
post, station, yard, center, or other activity
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a
military department or, in the case of an
activity in a foreign country, under the
operational control of the Secretary of a
military department or the Secretary of
Defense (see 10 U.S.C. 2801(c)(4)).
(b) Training. Contractor personnel who
require routine physical access to a
Federally-controlled facility or military
installation shall complete Level I
antiterrorism awareness training within 30
days of requiring access and annually
thereafter. In accordance with Department of
Defense Instruction O–2000.16 Volume 1,
DoD Antiterrorism (AT) Program
Implementation: DoD AT Standards, Level I
antiterrorism awareness training shall be
completed—
(1) Through a DoD-sponsored and certified
computer or web-based distance learning
instruction for Level I antiterrorism
awareness; or
(2) Under the instruction of a Level I
antiterrorism awareness instructor.
(c) Additional information. Information
and guidance pertaining to DoD antiterrorism
awareness training is available at https://
jko.jten.mil/ or as otherwise identified in the
performance work statement.
(d) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
include the substance of this clause,
including this paragraph (d), in subcontracts,
including subcontracts for commercial items,
when subcontractor performance requires
routine physical access to a Federallycontrolled facility or military installation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
RIN 0750–AJ83
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Amendments
Related to General Solicitations
(DFARS Case 2018–D021)
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement sections of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2018, which expand the
definition of ‘‘competitive procedures’’
in 10 U.S.C. 2302 and extend the term
and increase the dollar value under the
contract authority for advanced
development of initial or additional
prototype units.
DATES: Effective February 15, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Heather Kitchens, telephone 571–372–
6104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
252.204–7004 Antiterrorism Awareness
Training for Contractors.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
[Docket DARS–2018–0053]
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
4. Add section 252.204–7004 to read
as follows:
[FR Doc. 2019–02525 Filed 2–14–19; 8:45 am]
48 CFR Parts 206, 215, 234, and 235
AGENCY:
■
(End of clause)
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 83 FR 54698 on
October 31, 2018, to implement sections
221 and 861 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2018 (Pub. L. 115–91).
Section 221 amends 10 U.S.C.
2302(2)(B) to allow for an expanded
application of other competitive
procedures by replacing the words
‘‘basic research’’ with ‘‘science and
technology’’. ‘‘Competitive procedures’’
were defined in 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) to
include ‘‘the competitive selection for
award of basic research proposals
resulting from a general solicitation, and
the peer review or scientific review (as
appropriate) of such proposals.’’
Changing the words ‘‘basic research’’ to
‘‘science and technology’’ expands the
meaning of other competitive
procedures to apply to ‘‘advanced
technology development’’ and
‘‘advanced component development and
prototypes’’ research proposals, in
addition to ‘‘basic research’’ and
‘‘applied research’’ proposals. One of
the solicitation methods for research
and development proposals, a broad
agency announcement (BAA), is defined
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) as ‘‘a general announcement of an
agency’s research interest including
criteria for selecting proposals and
soliciting the participation of all offerors
capable of satisfying the Government’s
needs.’’ Section 221 permits the use of
BAAs for competitive selection of
science and technology proposals by
authorizing the use of the competitive
procedures at 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) that
result from a general solicitation and
peer or scientific review of such
proposals—a key element of the BAA
process.
Section 861 amends 10 U.S.C. 2302e
to allow for an extended term limit and
increased dollar threshold under the
contract authority for advanced
development of initial or additional
prototype units awarded from a
competitive selection, as specified in 10
U.S.C. 2302(2)(B). The statutory term
limit extends from 12 months to 2 years
and the dollar threshold increases from
$20 million to $100 million in fiscal
year 2017 constant dollars (10 U.S.C.
2302e). Section 861 also amends 10
U.S.C. 2302e to repeal the obsolete
authority implemented by section 819 of
the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111–84),
thereby eliminating the expiration date
of the authority.
One respondent submitted a public
comment on the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comment in
the development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comment received and
any changes made to the rule is
provided as follows:
A. Summary of Significant Changes
DoD did not make any changes to the
proposed rule as a result of the public
comment.
B. Analysis of Public Comment
Comment: The respondent
recommended the proposed rule update
213.106–1(b) to address documentation
requirements related to competition for
actions not exceeding the simplified
acquisition threshold (SAT).
Response: Since there is no DFARS
213.106–1(b) section, DoD reviewed
FAR 13.106–1(b), Soliciting
Competition, which allows contracting
officers to solicit from a single source,
for purchases not exceeding the SAT, if
the contracting officer determines that
circumstances deem only one source
reasonably available. This rule relates to
soliciting proposals using other
competitive procedures (such as a broad
agency announcement) and is not
related to solicitations of a single source
for purchases not exceeding the SAT;
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
therefore, DoD determined that the
public comment is outside the scope of
this rule.
C. Other Changes
One minor editorial change is made to
the final rule. DoD compared the
proposed rule to the current version of
the DFARS text and noted the need to
correct a typo at DFARS 215.371–4(a) by
changing the word ‘‘sections’’ to
‘‘section’’.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
This rule does not add any new
provisions or clauses or impact any
existing provisions or clauses.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order (E.O.s) 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review; and
E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
V. Executive Order 13771
This final rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action, because this rule is
not significant under E.O. 12866.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
has been prepared and is summarized as
follows:
This rule proposes to amend the
DFARS to implement sections 221 and
861 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2018.
Section 221 expands the definition of
‘‘competitive procedures’’ at 10 U.S.C.
2302(2)(B) by removing the term ‘‘basic
research’’ and adding ‘‘science and
technology’’ in its place. Section 861
implements a statutory modification to
10 U.S.C. 2302e to extend the term limit
and dollar threshold for the contract
authority for advanced development of
initial or additional prototype units
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
from 12 months to 2 years and from $20
million to $100 million in fiscal year
2017 constant dollars (10 U.S.C. 2302e),
respectively. The modification also
repeals the obsolete authority of section
819 of the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L.
111–84), thereby eliminating the
expiration date of September 30, 2019,
for the contract authority for advanced
development of initial or additional
prototype units.
The objective of this rule is to
implement sections 221 and 861 to
establish broad agency announcements
as a competitive procedure that may be
used to select science and technology
proposals and to expand the term limit
and dollar threshold for the contract
authority for advanced development of
initial or additional prototype units.
This rule impacts internal Government
procedures by expanding the meaning
of other competitive procedures to
include the competitive selection of
science and technology proposals and
expands the contract authority for
advanced development of initial or
additional prototype units.
There were no public comments
concerning the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
In FY 2017, DoD awarded 1,853
contracts for research and development,
excluding Small Business Innovation
Research (SBIR) and Small Technology
Transfer Research (STTR) program
requirements. Approximately 53% of
those new contract actions were
awarded to 1,005 of unique small
business and nontraditional DoD
entities. There were 2,858 new contract
awards for SBIR and STTR program
requirements for DoD. Approximately
66% of those new contract actions were
awarded to 1,891 of unique small
business and nontraditional DoD
entities.
This final rule does not include any
new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements for small entities.
There are no known significant
alternative approaches to the final rule
that would meet the requirements of the
applicable statute.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4365
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 206,
215, 234, and 235
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 206, 215, 234,
and 235 are amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 206, 215, 234, and 235 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 206—COMPETITION
REQUIREMENTS
2. Subpart 206.1, consisting of
206.102, is added to read as follows:
■
Subpart 206.1—Full and Open
Competition
206.102
Use of competitive procedures.
(d) Other competitive procedures.
(2) In lieu of FAR 6.102(d)(2),
competitive selection of science and
technology proposals resulting from a
broad agency announcement with peer
or scientific review, as described in
235.016(a) (10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B)).
PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
3. Section 215.371–4 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
■
215.371–4
Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(4) Acquisitions of science and
technology, as specified in 235.016(a);
or
*
*
*
*
*
PART 234—MAJOR SYSTEM
ACQUISITION
4. Section 234.005–1 is amended by—
a. Removing paragraph (2);
b. Redesignating paragraph (1) and
(1)(i) through (iii) as introductory text
and paragraphs (1), (2), and (3),
respectively;
■ c. In the newly redesignated
introductory text, removing ‘‘general
solicitation’’ and adding ‘‘broad agency
announcement’’ in its place;
■ d. In the newly redesignated
paragraph (2) removing ‘‘12 months’’
and adding ‘‘2 years’’ in its place; and
■ e. Revising the newly redesignated
paragraph (3) to read as follows:
■
■
■
234.005–1
Competition.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) The dollar value of the work to be
performed pursuant to the contract line
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
4366
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
item or contract option shall not exceed
$100 million in fiscal year 2017
constant dollars. (10 U.S.C. 2302e)
PART 235—RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
5. Section 235.006–71 is amended
by—
■ a. Redesignating the introductory text
as paragraph (b); and
■ b. Adding paragraph (a).
The addition reads as follows:
■
235.006—71
Competition.
(a) Use of a broad agency
announcement with peer or scientific
review for the award of science and
technology proposals in accordance
with 235.016(a) fulfills the requirement
for full and open competition (see
206.102(d)(2)).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Section 235.016 is added to read as
follows:
235.016
Broad agency announcement.
(a) General. A broad agency
announcement with peer or scientific
review may be used for the award of
science and technology proposals.
Science and technology proposals
include proposals for the following:
(i) Basic research (budget activity 6.1).
(ii) Applied research (budget activity
6.2).
(iii) Advanced technology
development (budget activity 6.3).
(iv) Advanced component
development and prototypes (budget
activity 6.4).
[FR Doc. 2019–02527 Filed 2–14–19; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 211
[Docket DARS–2018–0021]
RIN 0750–AJ23
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Use of
Commercial or Non-Government
Standards (DFARS Case 2017–D014)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 83 FR 30644 on June
29, 2018, to implement section 875(c) of
the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (Pub.
L. 114–328), which requires DoD to
revise the DFARS to encourage
contractors to propose commercial or
non-Government standards and
industry-wide practices that meet the
intent of military or Government-unique
specifications and standards. Four
respondents submitted comments on the
proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comments in
the development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments received
and any changes made to the rule are
provided as follows:
A. Summary of Significant Changes
There were no changes from the
proposed rule made in the final rule as
a result of the public comments.
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. Support for the Rule
Comment: Two respondents provided
support for the proposed rule.
Response: DoD acknowledges the
support for the rule.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
SUMMARY:
Fiscal Year 2017 by encouraging offerors
to propose commercial or nonGovernment standards and industrywide practices that meet the intent of
military or Government-unique
specifications and standards.
DATES: Effective February 15, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Kimberly Bass, telephone 571–372–
6174.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2. Section 875 Implementation
Comment: Several respondents shared
concerns with DoD’s implementation of
section 875 of the NDAA for FY 2017,
regarding how standards would be
added to the Acquisition Streamlining
and Standardization Information System
(ASSIST) database in order to
implement the statutory requirements.
The respondents also recommended
revisions to the rule to allow contractors
to propose equally effective standards
and supporting data for reliance upon
standards that meet the intent of the
Government’s requirements and to
require the Government to determine
that a commercial or non-Government
requirement does not meet a military
specification or standard.
Response: Maintenance of the ASSIST
database is beyond the scope of this
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule. Questions regarding standards and
the ASSIST database should be directed
to the Defense Standardization Program
Office. Contact information is available
at https://www.dsp.dla.mil/ContactUs1/. Removing the prohibition at
DFARS 211.107(b) on DoD using
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
52.211–7, Alternatives to GovernmentUnique Standards, allows offerors to
propose standards as alternatives, as
intended. The language in the rule
meets the intent of the statute at section
875(c) of the NDAA for FY 2017.
3. ASSIST Database Instructions
Comment: One respondent supported
the use of the ASSIST database as a
repository of voluntary consensus
standards adopted by DoD and
recommended additional instructions
and clarification on how nonGovernment standards are selected for
inclusion in the database.
Response: Maintenance or
modification of the ASSIST database is
beyond the scope of this rule. Questions
regarding standards and the ASSIST
database should be directed to the
Defense Standardization Program Office.
Contact information is available at
https://www.dsp.dla.mil/Contact-Us1/.
4. Applicability
Comment: Three respondents were
concerned by the limitation on
applicability of section 875 of the
NDAA for FY 2017 requirements to
contracts over the simplified acquisition
threshold (SAT) and noncommercial
contracts.
Response: Section III of this final rule
preamble clarifies that the rule does not
exclude solicitations for contracts
valued at or below the SAT. No change
to the text of the rule is required, since
the proposed rule did not include a
limitation to contracts valued above the
SAT in the clause prescription. This
rule, however, is not applicable to
commercial contracts, including COTS,
since Government- or military-unique
specifications and standards should not
be used in commercial contracts.
5. Use of FAR Provision 52.211–7
Comment: One respondent was
concerned that the existing solicitation
provision at FAR 52.211–7, Alternatives
to Government-Unique Standards, uses
a different standard in determining
whether the standard proposed by the
contractor is acceptable. The respondent
was also concerned the rule required
burden of proof from the contractor to
demonstrate the contractor’s proposed
standard meets the Government’s
requirement.
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4364-4366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02527]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 206, 215, 234, and 235
[Docket DARS-2018-0053]
RIN 0750-AJ83
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Amendments
Related to General Solicitations (DFARS Case 2018-D021)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement sections of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, which expand
the definition of ``competitive procedures'' in 10 U.S.C. 2302 and
extend the term and increase the dollar value under the contract
authority for advanced development of initial or additional prototype
units.
DATES: Effective February 15, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Heather Kitchens, telephone 571-
372-6104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 83 FR
54698 on October 31, 2018, to implement sections 221 and 861 of the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018
(Pub. L. 115-91).
Section 221 amends 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) to allow for an expanded
application of other competitive procedures by replacing the words
``basic research'' with ``science and technology''. ``Competitive
procedures'' were defined in 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) to include ``the
competitive selection for award of basic research proposals resulting
from a general solicitation, and the peer review or scientific review
(as appropriate) of such proposals.'' Changing the words ``basic
research'' to ``science and technology'' expands the meaning of other
competitive procedures to apply to ``advanced technology development''
and ``advanced component development and prototypes'' research
proposals, in addition to ``basic research'' and ``applied research''
proposals. One of the solicitation methods for research and development
proposals, a broad agency announcement (BAA), is defined in the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as ``a general announcement of an agency's
research interest including criteria for selecting proposals and
soliciting the participation of all offerors capable of satisfying the
Government's needs.'' Section 221 permits the use of BAAs for
competitive selection of science and technology proposals by
authorizing the use of the competitive procedures at 10 U.S.C.
2302(2)(B) that result from a general solicitation and peer or
scientific review of such proposals--a key element of the BAA process.
Section 861 amends 10 U.S.C. 2302e to allow for an extended term
limit and increased dollar threshold under the contract authority for
advanced development of initial or additional prototype units awarded
from a competitive selection, as specified in 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B). The
statutory term limit extends from 12 months to 2 years and the dollar
threshold increases from $20 million to $100 million in fiscal year
2017 constant dollars (10 U.S.C. 2302e). Section 861 also amends 10
U.S.C. 2302e to repeal the obsolete authority implemented by section
819 of the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84), thereby eliminating the
expiration date of the authority.
One respondent submitted a public comment on the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comment in the development of the final
rule. A discussion of the comment received and any changes made to the
rule is provided as follows:
A. Summary of Significant Changes
DoD did not make any changes to the proposed rule as a result of
the public comment.
B. Analysis of Public Comment
Comment: The respondent recommended the proposed rule update
213.106-1(b) to address documentation requirements related to
competition for actions not exceeding the simplified acquisition
threshold (SAT).
Response: Since there is no DFARS 213.106-1(b) section, DoD
reviewed FAR 13.106-1(b), Soliciting Competition, which allows
contracting officers to solicit from a single source, for purchases not
exceeding the SAT, if the contracting officer determines that
circumstances deem only one source reasonably available. This rule
relates to soliciting proposals using other competitive procedures
(such as a broad agency announcement) and is not related to
solicitations of a single source for purchases not exceeding the SAT;
[[Page 4365]]
therefore, DoD determined that the public comment is outside the scope
of this rule.
C. Other Changes
One minor editorial change is made to the final rule. DoD compared
the proposed rule to the current version of the DFARS text and noted
the need to correct a typo at DFARS 215.371-4(a) by changing the word
``sections'' to ``section''.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule does not add any new provisions or clauses or impact any
existing provisions or clauses.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order (E.O.s) 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review; and
E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and,
therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This is not a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
V. Executive Order 13771
This final rule is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action, because
this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is
summarized as follows:
This rule proposes to amend the DFARS to implement sections 221 and
861 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year
(FY) 2018.
Section 221 expands the definition of ``competitive procedures'' at
10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) by removing the term ``basic research'' and adding
``science and technology'' in its place. Section 861 implements a
statutory modification to 10 U.S.C. 2302e to extend the term limit and
dollar threshold for the contract authority for advanced development of
initial or additional prototype units from 12 months to 2 years and
from $20 million to $100 million in fiscal year 2017 constant dollars
(10 U.S.C. 2302e), respectively. The modification also repeals the
obsolete authority of section 819 of the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111-
84), thereby eliminating the expiration date of September 30, 2019, for
the contract authority for advanced development of initial or
additional prototype units.
The objective of this rule is to implement sections 221 and 861 to
establish broad agency announcements as a competitive procedure that
may be used to select science and technology proposals and to expand
the term limit and dollar threshold for the contract authority for
advanced development of initial or additional prototype units. This
rule impacts internal Government procedures by expanding the meaning of
other competitive procedures to include the competitive selection of
science and technology proposals and expands the contract authority for
advanced development of initial or additional prototype units.
There were no public comments concerning the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
In FY 2017, DoD awarded 1,853 contracts for research and
development, excluding Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and
Small Technology Transfer Research (STTR) program requirements.
Approximately 53% of those new contract actions were awarded to 1,005
of unique small business and nontraditional DoD entities. There were
2,858 new contract awards for SBIR and STTR program requirements for
DoD. Approximately 66% of those new contract actions were awarded to
1,891 of unique small business and nontraditional DoD entities.
This final rule does not include any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements for small entities.
There are no known significant alternative approaches to the final
rule that would meet the requirements of the applicable statute.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 206, 215, 234, and 235
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 206, 215, 234, and 235 are amended as
follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 206, 215, 234, and 235
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 206--COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
0
2. Subpart 206.1, consisting of 206.102, is added to read as follows:
Subpart 206.1--Full and Open Competition
206.102 Use of competitive procedures.
(d) Other competitive procedures.
(2) In lieu of FAR 6.102(d)(2), competitive selection of science
and technology proposals resulting from a broad agency announcement
with peer or scientific review, as described in 235.016(a) (10 U.S.C.
2302(2)(B)).
PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
0
3. Section 215.371-4 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
215.371-4 Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(4) Acquisitions of science and technology, as specified in
235.016(a); or
* * * * *
PART 234--MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
0
4. Section 234.005-1 is amended by--
0
a. Removing paragraph (2);
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (1) and (1)(i) through (iii) as introductory
text and paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively;
0
c. In the newly redesignated introductory text, removing ``general
solicitation'' and adding ``broad agency announcement'' in its place;
0
d. In the newly redesignated paragraph (2) removing ``12 months'' and
adding ``2 years'' in its place; and
0
e. Revising the newly redesignated paragraph (3) to read as follows:
234.005-1 Competition.
* * * * *
(3) The dollar value of the work to be performed pursuant to the
contract line
[[Page 4366]]
item or contract option shall not exceed $100 million in fiscal year
2017 constant dollars. (10 U.S.C. 2302e)
PART 235--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
0
5. Section 235.006-71 is amended by--
0
a. Redesignating the introductory text as paragraph (b); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (a).
The addition reads as follows:
235.006--71 Competition.
(a) Use of a broad agency announcement with peer or scientific
review for the award of science and technology proposals in accordance
with 235.016(a) fulfills the requirement for full and open competition
(see 206.102(d)(2)).
* * * * *
0
6. Section 235.016 is added to read as follows:
235.016 Broad agency announcement.
(a) General. A broad agency announcement with peer or scientific
review may be used for the award of science and technology proposals.
Science and technology proposals include proposals for the following:
(i) Basic research (budget activity 6.1).
(ii) Applied research (budget activity 6.2).
(iii) Advanced technology development (budget activity 6.3).
(iv) Advanced component development and prototypes (budget activity
6.4).
[FR Doc. 2019-02527 Filed 2-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P