Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.; Canadair Limited) Airplanes, 4315-4318 [2019-02162]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
81205–SB340038–00 RB, Issue 001, dated
November 16, 2017.
(h) Concurrent Requirements
For airplanes identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB340013–00, Issue
002, dated May 6, 2016: Prior to or
concurrently with the action required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, install FMS, Thrust
Management System (TMS), and
Communication Management Function
(CMF) software identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB340013–00, Issue
002, dated May 6, 2016, and do a software
check, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB340013–00,
Issue 002, dated May 6, 2016; except where
Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB340013–00, Issue 002, dated May 6, 2016,
specifies installing software, this AD requires
installing that software or later-approved
software versions. Later-approved software
versions are only those Boeing software
versions that are approved as a replacement
for the applicable software, and are approved
as part of the type design by the FAA or the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA after
issuance of Boeing Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB340013–00, Issue 002, dated May 6,
2016. If the software check fails, before
further flight, accomplish corrective actions
and repeat the software check and applicable
corrective actions until the software check is
passed.
(i) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD,
installation on any airplane of FMS OPS
version HNP5F–AL11–5010 or HNP58–
AL11–5006 is prohibited, except as required
by paragraph (h) of this AD.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (h) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB340013–00, Issue
001, dated December 23, 2015.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes ODA that has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
4315
Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(l) Related Information
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0638; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–016–AD; Amendment
39–19552; AD 2019–02–05]
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Nelson Sanchez, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Section, FAA,
Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
231–3543; email: nelson.sanchez@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
B787–81205–SB340038–00 RB, Issue 001,
dated November 16, 2017.
(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB340013–00, Issue 002, dated May 6, 2016.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
January 10, 2019.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–02160 Filed 2–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air
Limited (Type Certificate Previously
Held by Bombardier, Inc.; Canadair
Limited) Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013–11–
03, which applied to certain Viking Air
Limited Model CL–215–1A10 and CL–
215–6B11 (CL–215T Variant) airplanes.
AD 2013–11–03 required repetitive
detailed inspections for cracking of the
left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) wing
lower skin, and repair if necessary. This
AD requires repetitive borescope
inspections of the LH and RH wing
lower skin and repetitive eddy current
inspections of the LH and RH wing front
and rear lower spar caps. This AD was
prompted by reports of a fractured wing
lower rear spar cap and reinforcing strap
and a report of cracking of the wing
lower skin and rear spar. We are issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 22,
2019.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Viking Air Limited, 1959 de Havilland
Way, Sidney, British Columbia V8L
5V5, Canada; telephone +1–250–656–
7227; fax +1–250–656–0673; email acstechnical.publications@vikingair.com;
internet https://www.vikingair.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195. It is also available
on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0638.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
4316
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0638; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–
228–7330; fax 516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2013–11–03,
Amendment 39–17463 (78 FR 32353,
May 30, 2013) (‘‘AD 2013–11–03’’). AD
2013–11–03 applied to certain Viking
Air Limited Model CL–215–1A10 and
CL–215–6B11 (CL–215T Variant)
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on August 2, 2018 (83
FR 37768). The NPRM was prompted by
reports of a fractured wing lower rear
spar cap and reinforcing strap and a
report of cracking of the wing lower skin
and rear spar. The NPRM proposed to
require repetitive borescope inspections
of the LH and RH wing lower skin and
repetitive eddy current inspections of
the LH and RH wing front and rear
lower spar caps. We are issuing this AD
to address cracked wing structure,
which could result in failure of the
wing.
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian AD
CF–2013–11R1, dated October 16, 2017
(referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Viking Air Limited
Model CL–215–1A10 and CL–215–6B11
(CL–215T Variant) airplanes. The MCAI
states:
While performing modifications on a CL–
215–1A10 aeroplane, an operator discovered
that the wing lower rear spar cap and
reinforcing strap were fractured at Wing
Stations (WS) 49.5 and 50 respectively and
the rear spar web and wing lower skin were
also cracked. It is suspected that a crack
initiated at the wing lower spar cap, leading
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
to its failure, the subsequent failure of the
reinforcing strap and cracking of the spar
web and wing lower skin. The damage was
outside of the area addressed by the
repetitive ultrasonic inspections required by
[Canadian] AD CF–1992–26R2 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 2012–11–04,
Amendment 39–17067 (77 FR 32892, June 4,
2012)] and was found 95 hours air time after
the last ultrasonic inspection.
Failure and cracking of the above-noted
wing structure, if not detected, could result
in failure of the wing.
In order to mitigate the unsafe condition,
[Canadian] AD CF–2013–11 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 2013–11–03] was
released. However, further analysis has
indicated the need for repetitive eddy current
and borescope inspections. Therefore,
Revision 1 of this [Canadian] AD mandates
a repetitive detailed inspection of the wing
lower skin using a borescope, changes the
one-time eddy current inspection of the
lower front and rear spar caps to a repetitive
inspection and eliminates the one-time
detailed inspection with fuel bladders
removed.
The requirements of [Canadian] AD CF–
1992–26R2 remain applicable.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0638.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this final rule.
The following presents the comment
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to that comment.
Request To Use Time-in-Service Hours
Rather Than Flight Hours
The commenter, Adam Geber,
recommended using time-in-service
hours instead of flight hours in the
proposed AD. The commenter stated
that maintenance hourly requirements
are based on time-in-service rather than
flight time, as defined in 14 CFR 1.1.
The commenter further asserted that the
term ‘‘flight hour’’ is not defined in 14
CFR 1.1, and that many 14 CFR part 91
regulations prescribe hourly
maintenance requirements based on
time-in-service, with no requirement to
track flight time for maintenance
purposes.
We disagree with the commenter’s
recommended changes, because flight
hours, which are in current use and well
understood in the aviation industry, are
the most effective way of addressing the
unsafe condition identified in this AD.
Flight hours were used in the
engineering evaluation for this AD, and
the required actions of this AD are based
on that evaluation. The use of flight
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
hours in this AD is also in keeping with
the previous related ADs, which use
that measure for compliance times and
inspection intervals. Additionally, since
flight hours are used in this AD,
operators are required to track them. AD
requirements are not restricted by the
definitions in 14 CFR 1.1 or the part 91
regulations quoted by commenter. We
have not changed this AD in this regard.
Explanation of Change to Manufacturer
Name Specified in AD 2013–11–03
We have revised references to the
aircraft manufacturer name specified in
AD 2013–11–03 throughout this final
rule to identify the aircraft manufacturer
name as published in the most recent
type certificate data sheet (TCDS) for the
affected models.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the change described
previously and minor editorial changes.
We have determined that these minor
changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Bombardier has issued Alert Service
Bulletin 215–A558, Revision 3, dated
June 3, 2016. This service information
describes procedures for detecting
cracks using repetitive borescope
inspections of the LH and RH wing
lower skin and repetitive eddy current
inspections of the LH and RH wing front
and rear lower spar caps. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 4
airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
the following costs to comply with this
AD:
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
4317
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Borescope and eddy current
inspections.
Labor cost
8 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $680 per inspection cycle.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes and associated appliances to
the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
16:03 Feb 14, 2019
$0
Jkt 247001
Cost on
U.S. operators
$680 per inspection cycle ......
$2,720 per inspection cycle.
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, Wings.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013–11–03, Amendment 39–17463 (78
FR 32353, May 30, 2013), and adding
the following new AD:
■
2019–02–05 Viking Air Limited (Type
Certificate Previously Held by
Bombardier, Inc.; Canadair Limited):
Amendment 39–19552; Docket No.
FAA–2018–0638; Product Identifier
2018–NM–016–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective March 22, 2019.
Regulatory Findings
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Cost per
product
Parts cost
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2013–11–03,
Amendment 39–17463 (78 FR 32353, May 30,
2013) (‘‘AD 2013–11–03’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Viking Air Limited
(Type Certificate previously held by
Bombardier, Inc.; Canadair Limited)
airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Model CL–215–1A10 airplanes, serial
numbers (S/Ns) 1001 through 1125 inclusive.
(2) Model CL–215–6B11 (CL–215T Variant)
airplanes, S/Ns 1056 through 1125 inclusive.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of a
fractured wing lower rear spar cap and
reinforcing strap and a report of cracking of
the wing lower skin and rear spar. We are
issuing this AD to address cracked wing
structure, which could result in failure of the
wing.
(g) Repetitive Borescope Inspection
Within 50 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD: Using a borescope, do a
detailed inspection for cracking of the lefthand (LH) and right-hand (RH) wing lower
skin between wing station (WS) 45.00 and
51.00, in accordance with Part A of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–A558,
Revision 3, dated June 3, 2016. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 50 flight hours until the initial eddy
current inspection required by paragraph (h)
of this AD has been accomplished. After
accomplishment of the initial eddy current
inspection required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, the borescope inspection interval
required by this paragraph may be extended
to 300 flight hours.
(h) Repetitive Eddy Current Inspections
Within 300 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD: Do an eddy current
inspection for cracking of the LH and RH
wing front and rear lower spar caps, in
accordance with Parts C–1 and C–2 of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–A558,
Revision 3, dated June 3, 2016. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 300 flight hours.
(i) Corrective Actions
If any crack, as defined in Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin 215–A558, Revision 3,
dated June 3, 2016, is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) or
paragraph (h) of this AD: Before further
flight, repair using a method approved by the
Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA; or
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Viking Air Limited’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO,
the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
initial inspections required by paragraphs (g)
and (h) of this AD if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
4318
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
using Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–
A558, Revision 1, dated January 10, 2014; or
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–A558,
Revision 2, dated January 17, 2014.
(k) No Reporting Requirement
Although Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin 215–A558, Revision 3, dated June 3,
2016, specifies to submit certain information
to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include that requirement.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or TCCA; or Viking Air Limited’s TCCA
DAO. If approved by the DAO, the approval
must include the DAO-authorized signature.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
AD CF–2013–11R1, dated October 16, 2017,
for related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0638.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section,
FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 516–228–7330; fax 516–794–5531.
(3) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–
A558, Revision 3, dated June 3, 2016.
(ii) [Reserved].
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Viking Air Limited, 1959 de
Havilland Way, Sidney, British Columbia
V8L 5V5, Canada; telephone +1–250–656–
7227; fax +1–250–656–0673; email acstechnical.publications@vikingair.com;
internet https://www.vikingair.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
February 1, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–02162 Filed 2–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0581; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–029–AD; Amendment
39–19547; AD 2019–01–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0581; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Buss, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
231–3564; email: Allison.Buss@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777–200,
–200LR, –300, and –300ER series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
report that showed a non-compliance
exists on some in-service galley
attendant seat fitting installations. The
non-compliance could result in flight
attendant seats failing in a high-G crash.
This AD requires modifications for
galley mounted seat fittings. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 22,
2019.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
SUMMARY:
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0581.
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 777–200, –200LR, –300, and
–300ER series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
July 6, 2018 (83 FR 31509). The NPRM
was prompted by a report that showed
a non-compliance exists on some inservice galley attendant seat fitting
installations. The NPRM proposed to
require modifications for galley
mounted seat fittings.
We are issuing this AD to address
non-compliant flight attendant seats,
which could fail in a high-G crash and
result in potential injury to flight
attendants and consequent inability of
the flight attendants to assist with
passenger evacuation in a timely
manner.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this final rule.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing indicated its support for the
NPRM.
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4315-4318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02162]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0638; Product Identifier 2018-NM-016-AD; Amendment
39-19552; AD 2019-02-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.; Canadair Limited) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-11-03,
which applied to certain Viking Air Limited Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-
215-6B11 (CL-215T Variant) airplanes. AD 2013-11-03 required repetitive
detailed inspections for cracking of the left-hand (LH) and right-hand
(RH) wing lower skin, and repair if necessary. This AD requires
repetitive borescope inspections of the LH and RH wing lower skin and
repetitive eddy current inspections of the LH and RH wing front and
rear lower spar caps. This AD was prompted by reports of a fractured
wing lower rear spar cap and reinforcing strap and a report of cracking
of the wing lower skin and rear spar. We are issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 22, 2019.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 22,
2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Viking Air Limited, 1959 de Havilland Way, Sidney, British
Columbia V8L 5V5, Canada; telephone +1-250-656-7227; fax +1-250-656-
0673; email acs-technical.publications@vikingair.com; internet https://www.vikingair.com. You may view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0638.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://
[[Page 4316]]
www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0638; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7330;
fax 516-794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2013-11-03, Amendment 39-17463 (78 FR 32353,
May 30, 2013) (``AD 2013-11-03''). AD 2013-11-03 applied to certain
Viking Air Limited Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-6B11 (CL-215T Variant)
airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on August 2, 2018
(83 FR 37768). The NPRM was prompted by reports of a fractured wing
lower rear spar cap and reinforcing strap and a report of cracking of
the wing lower skin and rear spar. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive borescope inspections of the LH and RH wing lower skin and
repetitive eddy current inspections of the LH and RH wing front and
rear lower spar caps. We are issuing this AD to address cracked wing
structure, which could result in failure of the wing.
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2013-11R1, dated
October 16, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Viking Air Limited Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-
6B11 (CL-215T Variant) airplanes. The MCAI states:
While performing modifications on a CL-215-1A10 aeroplane, an
operator discovered that the wing lower rear spar cap and
reinforcing strap were fractured at Wing Stations (WS) 49.5 and 50
respectively and the rear spar web and wing lower skin were also
cracked. It is suspected that a crack initiated at the wing lower
spar cap, leading to its failure, the subsequent failure of the
reinforcing strap and cracking of the spar web and wing lower skin.
The damage was outside of the area addressed by the repetitive
ultrasonic inspections required by [Canadian] AD CF-1992-26R2 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 2012-11-04, Amendment 39-17067 (77 FR 32892,
June 4, 2012)] and was found 95 hours air time after the last
ultrasonic inspection.
Failure and cracking of the above-noted wing structure, if not
detected, could result in failure of the wing.
In order to mitigate the unsafe condition, [Canadian] AD CF-
2013-11 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2013-11-03] was released.
However, further analysis has indicated the need for repetitive eddy
current and borescope inspections. Therefore, Revision 1 of this
[Canadian] AD mandates a repetitive detailed inspection of the wing
lower skin using a borescope, changes the one-time eddy current
inspection of the lower front and rear spar caps to a repetitive
inspection and eliminates the one-time detailed inspection with fuel
bladders removed.
The requirements of [Canadian] AD CF-1992-26R2 remain
applicable.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0638.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comment received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to that comment.
Request To Use Time-in-Service Hours Rather Than Flight Hours
The commenter, Adam Geber, recommended using time-in-service hours
instead of flight hours in the proposed AD. The commenter stated that
maintenance hourly requirements are based on time-in-service rather
than flight time, as defined in 14 CFR 1.1. The commenter further
asserted that the term ``flight hour'' is not defined in 14 CFR 1.1,
and that many 14 CFR part 91 regulations prescribe hourly maintenance
requirements based on time-in-service, with no requirement to track
flight time for maintenance purposes.
We disagree with the commenter's recommended changes, because
flight hours, which are in current use and well understood in the
aviation industry, are the most effective way of addressing the unsafe
condition identified in this AD. Flight hours were used in the
engineering evaluation for this AD, and the required actions of this AD
are based on that evaluation. The use of flight hours in this AD is
also in keeping with the previous related ADs, which use that measure
for compliance times and inspection intervals. Additionally, since
flight hours are used in this AD, operators are required to track them.
AD requirements are not restricted by the definitions in 14 CFR 1.1 or
the part 91 regulations quoted by commenter. We have not changed this
AD in this regard.
Explanation of Change to Manufacturer Name Specified in AD 2013-11-03
We have revised references to the aircraft manufacturer name
specified in AD 2013-11-03 throughout this final rule to identify the
aircraft manufacturer name as published in the most recent type
certificate data sheet (TCDS) for the affected models.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the change described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Bombardier has issued Alert Service Bulletin 215-A558, Revision 3,
dated June 3, 2016. This service information describes procedures for
detecting cracks using repetitive borescope inspections of the LH and
RH wing lower skin and repetitive eddy current inspections of the LH
and RH wing front and rear lower spar caps. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 4 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
[[Page 4317]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borescope and eddy current 8 work-hours x $85 $0 $680 per inspection $2,720 per
inspections. per hour = $680 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-11-03, Amendment 39-17463 (78 FR 32353, May 30, 2013), and adding
the following new AD:
2019-02-05 Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by
Bombardier, Inc.; Canadair Limited): Amendment 39-19552; Docket No.
FAA-2018-0638; Product Identifier 2018-NM-016-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective March 22, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2013-11-03, Amendment 39-17463 (78 FR 32353,
May 30, 2013) (``AD 2013-11-03'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
previously held by Bombardier, Inc.; Canadair Limited) airplanes
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated
in any category.
(1) Model CL-215-1A10 airplanes, serial numbers (S/Ns) 1001
through 1125 inclusive.
(2) Model CL-215-6B11 (CL-215T Variant) airplanes, S/Ns 1056
through 1125 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of a fractured wing lower rear
spar cap and reinforcing strap and a report of cracking of the wing
lower skin and rear spar. We are issuing this AD to address cracked
wing structure, which could result in failure of the wing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Repetitive Borescope Inspection
Within 50 flight hours after the effective date of this AD:
Using a borescope, do a detailed inspection for cracking of the
left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) wing lower skin between wing
station (WS) 45.00 and 51.00, in accordance with Part A of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A558, Revision 3, dated June
3, 2016. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed
50 flight hours until the initial eddy current inspection required
by paragraph (h) of this AD has been accomplished. After
accomplishment of the initial eddy current inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, the borescope inspection interval required
by this paragraph may be extended to 300 flight hours.
(h) Repetitive Eddy Current Inspections
Within 300 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Do
an eddy current inspection for cracking of the LH and RH wing front
and rear lower spar caps, in accordance with Parts C-1 and C-2 of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A558, Revision 3, dated June
3, 2016. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed
300 flight hours.
(i) Corrective Actions
If any crack, as defined in Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
215-A558, Revision 3, dated June 3, 2016, is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) or paragraph (h) of this AD:
Before further flight, repair using a method approved by the
Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA); or Viking Air Limited's TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the initial inspections
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD
[[Page 4318]]
using Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A558, Revision 1, dated
January 10, 2014; or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A558,
Revision 2, dated January 17, 2014.
(k) No Reporting Requirement
Although Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A558, Revision 3,
dated June 3, 2016, specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or TCCA; or Viking Air Limited's TCCA DAO. If approved
by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2013-11R1, dated October 16, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-0638.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Andrea Jimenez,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA,
New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone 516-228-7330; fax 516-794-5531.
(3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A558, Revision 3,
dated June 3, 2016.
(ii) [Reserved].
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Viking Air Limited, 1959 de Havilland Way, Sidney, British Columbia
V8L 5V5, Canada; telephone +1-250-656-7227; fax +1-250-656-0673;
email acs-technical.publications@vikingair.com; internet https://www.vikingair.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on February 1, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-02162 Filed 2-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P