Notice of Availability for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Otay Mesa Port of Entry, San Diego, California, 3780-3781 [2019-02205]

Download as PDF 3780 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2019 / Notices As a general matter, information collections will not result in any new system of records containing privacy information and will not ask questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. Current Action: New collection of information. Type of Review: New collection. Affected Public: Individuals and Households, Businesses and Organizations, State, Local or Tribal Government. Below we provide projected average annual estimates: Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 7,000. Expected Annual Number of Activities: 1. Number of Respondents per Activity: 1. Annual Responses: 7,000. Frequency of Response: Once per request. Average Minutes per Response: 10. Average Expected Annual Burden hours: 1,667. Dated: February 6, 2019. Jeannette Walters-Marquez, Attorney Advisor, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. BILLING CODE 6732–01–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (‘‘Act’’) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than February 27, 2019. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198–0001: 1. Carroll D. Esry, Sarasota, Florida, The Nancy Marie Esry Irrevocable Trust, 17:22 Feb 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 8, 2019. Yao-Chin Chao, Assistant Secretary of the Board. Governors not later than March 11, 2019. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414: 1. Greenwoods Financial Group, Inc., Lake Mills, Wisconsin; to acquire voting shares of Fox River Financial Corporation and thereby indirectly acquire Fox River State Bank, both of Burlington, Wisconsin. 2. Waterman Acquisition Group, LLC, Wilmette, Illinois; to become a bank holding company by acquiring voting shares of Waterman State Bank, Waterman, Illinois. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 8, 2019. Yao-Chin Chao, Assistant Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2019–02174 Filed 2–12–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P [FR Doc. 2019–02175 Filed 2–12–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies [FR Doc. 2019–01938 Filed 2–12–19; 8:45 am] VerDate Sep<11>2014 Independence, Missouri, The William C. Esry Family Trust and William C. Esry, Independence, Missouri, individually and as trustee, The David Reich Esry Family Trust and David R. Esry, Lee’s Summit, Missouri, individually, as custodian, and as trustee, Marcie Esry Johnson, Sarasota, Florida, The Carolyn Marcile Weir Irrevocable Trust, Independence, Missouri, Weir Farm LLC, Independence, Missouri, Robert K. Weir, Independence, Missouri, William N. Weir, Blue Springs, Missouri, Susan Weir Carter, Bay Village, Ohio, and Geoffrey D. Carter, Bay Village, Ohio; to become members of the Reich Family Group and thereby retain shares of Blue Ridge Bancshares and its subsidiary, Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Company, both of Independence, Missouri. The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Notice–PBS–2019–01; Docket No. 2019– 0002; Sequence No. 1] Notice of Availability for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Otay Mesa Port of Entry, San Diego, California Public Buildings Service (PBS), General Services Administration (GSA). ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: This notice announces the availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), which examines the potential impacts of a proposal by the General Services Administration (GSA) to modernize and expand the existing Otay Mesa Land Port of Entry (LPOE) located at the United States (U.S.)-Mexico border in the City of San Diego community of Otay Mesa, in San Diego County, California. The FEIS describes the reason the project is being proposed, the alternatives being considered, the potential impacts of each of the alternatives on the existing environment, and avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures. As the lead agency in this undertaking, GSA is acting on behalf of its major tenant at this facility, the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Customs and Border Protection (CBP). SUMMARY: The comment period for the FEIS ends March 11th, 2019. After this date, GSA will prepare the Record of Decision DATES: E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2019 / Notices (ROD). A public meeting for the FEIS will be held on March 7th, 2019. ADDRESSES: Further information, including an electronic copy of the FEIS, may be found online on the following website: https://www.gsa.gov/ about-us/regions/welcome-to-thepacific-rim-region-9/land-ports-of-entry/ otay-mesa-land-port-of-entry/otay-mesaenvironmental-review. Questions or comments concerning the FEIS should be directed to: Osmahn Kadri, NEPA Project Manager, 50 United Nations Plaza, 3345 Mailbox #9, San Francisco, CA 94102, or via email to osmahn.kadri@gsa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Otay Mesa LPOE is located approximately 17 miles southeast of downtown San Diego, just north of the U.S. border and the Baja California Peninsula of Mexico. When it was constructed in 1983, its primary purpose was to divert growing commercial truck traffic from the increasingly busy San Ysidro LPOE to the west at the southern terminus of Interstate 5. The LPOE handles commercial and privately-owned vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Since the LPOE opened, vehicle and pedestrian traffic and the population and general development in the area have grown. It is now one of the ten busiest land ports in the country and is the busiest commercial port on the CaliforniaMexico border, handling the second highest volume of trucks, and third highest dollar volume of trade among all U.S.-Mexico LPOEs. Ever-increasing traffic loads and new security initiatives require increased capacity and new inspection technology to be installed and implemented at the existing facilities. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Background The Project’s purpose is to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, security and safety at the existing Otay Mesa LPOE. The Project’s need, or the need to which the GSA is responding, is to increase the LPOE’s capacity due to increased demand, and to address public and employee safety and border security concerns. The FEIS considers two ‘‘action’’ alternatives and one ‘‘no action’’ alternative. The Preferred Alternative would include the development of an approximately 10-acre GSA-owned plot of land to the immediate east of the existing commercial import lot. The new lot would be used to construct commercial inspection buildings and additional commercial import lanes. Improvements to existing pedestrian lanes and personal vehicle inspection lanes; relocation of personnel currently VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:22 Feb 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 housed in the Pedestrian, Commercial Import and Commercial Export buildings; renovation of existing facilities throughout the Otay Mesa LPOE; and demolition of facilities that would no longer be needed would also occur. New construction would include commercial import and exit booths, six additional pedestrian lanes in the Pedestrian Building, a Commercial Annex Building (CAB), a return-toMexico lane for commercial traffic, a pedestrian ramp and parking areas for the new commercial lot. Building renovations would include the installation of energy conservation measures and water conservation measures across the Otay Mesa LPOE, the correction of deficiencies throughout existing facilities (e.g., updating security systems, updating HVAC systems, improving lighting and repaving old asphalt surfaces), and refurbishing the interiors of the Pedestrian, Commercial Import and Commercial Export buildings including repainting and replacing flooring. The Reduced Build Alternative would include many of the same activities as under the Preferred Alternative; however, the overall activity level would be lower. Notably, no new construction would occur on the 10-acre GSA-owned plot of land, and the CAB would not be constructed; instead, the plot of land would be paved and used as additional space for the commercial vehicle inspection booths which would be reconfigured to increase traffic flow. Renovation of existing facilities would still occur, but activities would be limited to updating security and HVAC systems and repainting interiors. The No Action Alternative assumes that modernization and expansion of the existing LPOE would not occur and that a new facility would not be constructed adjacent to the existing LPOE. The LPOE would continue to operate under current conditions. Public Meeting A public meeting for the FEIS will be held on Thursday, March 7th from 4 to 6 p.m. at: Holiday Inn Express and Suites San Diego, 2296 Niels Bohr Court, San Diego, CA 92154, 619–710– 0900. The meeting will be conducted in an open house format, where project information will be presented and distributed. Interested parties are encouraged to attend and provide written comments on the FEIS. Comments must be received by March 11th, 2019 and emailed to osmahn.kadri@gsa.gov or sent to: General Services Administration, Attention: Osmahn Kadri, NEPA Project PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3781 Manager, 50 United Nations Plaza, 3345 Mailbox #9, San Francisco, CA 94102. Next Steps After comments are received from the public and reviewing agencies, GSA may 1. Give environmental approval to the Project by signing a ROD no sooner than 30 days after the FEIS is issued. In the ROD, GSA will explain all the factors that were considered in reaching its final decision, including the environmental factors. GSA will identify the environmentally preferable alternative or alternatives and may select one of the alternatives or a combination of alternatives analyzed in the EIS. 2. Undertake additional environmental studies, or 3. Abandon the Project. If the Project is given environmental approval and funding is appropriated, the GSA could design and construct all or part of the Project. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Osmahn A. Kadri, NEPA Project Manager, General Services Administration at 415–522–3617. Please also call this number if special assistance is needed to attend and participate in the public meeting. Dated: February 6, 2019. Matthew Jear, Director, Portfolio Management Division, Pacific Rim Region, Public Buildings Service. [FR Doc. 2019–02205 Filed 2–12–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–YF–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [OMB Control No. 9000–0107; Docket No. 2018–0003; Sequence No. 22] Submission for OMB Review; Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 23 Requirements Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Regulatory Secretariat Division will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a previously approved information collection requirement regarding FAR part 23 requirements. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3780-3781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[Notice-PBS-2019-01; Docket No. 2019-0002; Sequence No. 1]


Notice of Availability for the Final Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Otay Mesa Port of Entry, San Diego, California

AGENCY: Public Buildings Service (PBS), General Services Administration 
(GSA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), which examines the potential 
impacts of a proposal by the General Services Administration (GSA) to 
modernize and expand the existing Otay Mesa Land Port of Entry (LPOE) 
located at the United States (U.S.)-Mexico border in the City of San 
Diego community of Otay Mesa, in San Diego County, California. The FEIS 
describes the reason the project is being proposed, the alternatives 
being considered, the potential impacts of each of the alternatives on 
the existing environment, and avoidance, minimization, and/or 
mitigation measures.
    As the lead agency in this undertaking, GSA is acting on behalf of 
its major tenant at this facility, the Department of Homeland 
Security's (DHS) Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

DATES: The comment period for the FEIS ends March 11th, 2019. After 
this date, GSA will prepare the Record of Decision

[[Page 3781]]

(ROD). A public meeting for the FEIS will be held on March 7th, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Further information, including an electronic copy of the 
FEIS, may be found online on the following website: https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/regions/welcome-to-the-pacific-rim-region-9/land-ports-of-entry/otay-mesa-land-port-of-entry/otay-mesa-environmental-review. Questions or comments concerning the FEIS should be directed 
to: Osmahn Kadri, NEPA Project Manager, 50 United Nations Plaza, 3345 
Mailbox #9, San Francisco, CA 94102, or via email to 
osmahn.kadri@gsa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Otay Mesa LPOE is located approximately 
17 miles southeast of downtown San Diego, just north of the U.S. border 
and the Baja California Peninsula of Mexico. When it was constructed in 
1983, its primary purpose was to divert growing commercial truck 
traffic from the increasingly busy San Ysidro LPOE to the west at the 
southern terminus of Interstate 5. The LPOE handles commercial and 
privately-owned vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Since the LPOE opened, 
vehicle and pedestrian traffic and the population and general 
development in the area have grown. It is now one of the ten busiest 
land ports in the country and is the busiest commercial port on the 
California-Mexico border, handling the second highest volume of trucks, 
and third highest dollar volume of trade among all U.S.-Mexico LPOEs. 
Ever-increasing traffic loads and new security initiatives require 
increased capacity and new inspection technology to be installed and 
implemented at the existing facilities.

Background

    The Project's purpose is to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, 
security and safety at the existing Otay Mesa LPOE. The Project's need, 
or the need to which the GSA is responding, is to increase the LPOE's 
capacity due to increased demand, and to address public and employee 
safety and border security concerns.
    The FEIS considers two ``action'' alternatives and one ``no 
action'' alternative. The Preferred Alternative would include the 
development of an approximately 10-acre GSA-owned plot of land to the 
immediate east of the existing commercial import lot. The new lot would 
be used to construct commercial inspection buildings and additional 
commercial import lanes. Improvements to existing pedestrian lanes and 
personal vehicle inspection lanes; relocation of personnel currently 
housed in the Pedestrian, Commercial Import and Commercial Export 
buildings; renovation of existing facilities throughout the Otay Mesa 
LPOE; and demolition of facilities that would no longer be needed would 
also occur. New construction would include commercial import and exit 
booths, six additional pedestrian lanes in the Pedestrian Building, a 
Commercial Annex Building (CAB), a return-to-Mexico lane for commercial 
traffic, a pedestrian ramp and parking areas for the new commercial 
lot. Building renovations would include the installation of energy 
conservation measures and water conservation measures across the Otay 
Mesa LPOE, the correction of deficiencies throughout existing 
facilities (e.g., updating security systems, updating HVAC systems, 
improving lighting and repaving old asphalt surfaces), and refurbishing 
the interiors of the Pedestrian, Commercial Import and Commercial 
Export buildings including repainting and replacing flooring.
    The Reduced Build Alternative would include many of the same 
activities as under the Preferred Alternative; however, the overall 
activity level would be lower. Notably, no new construction would occur 
on the 10-acre GSA-owned plot of land, and the CAB would not be 
constructed; instead, the plot of land would be paved and used as 
additional space for the commercial vehicle inspection booths which 
would be reconfigured to increase traffic flow. Renovation of existing 
facilities would still occur, but activities would be limited to 
updating security and HVAC systems and repainting interiors.
    The No Action Alternative assumes that modernization and expansion 
of the existing LPOE would not occur and that a new facility would not 
be constructed adjacent to the existing LPOE. The LPOE would continue 
to operate under current conditions.

Public Meeting

    A public meeting for the FEIS will be held on Thursday, March 7th 
from 4 to 6 p.m. at: Holiday Inn Express and Suites San Diego, 2296 
Niels Bohr Court, San Diego, CA 92154, 619-710-0900.
    The meeting will be conducted in an open house format, where 
project information will be presented and distributed. Interested 
parties are encouraged to attend and provide written comments on the 
FEIS. Comments must be received by March 11th, 2019 and emailed to 
osmahn.kadri@gsa.gov or sent to: General Services Administration, 
Attention: Osmahn Kadri, NEPA Project Manager, 50 United Nations Plaza, 
3345 Mailbox #9, San Francisco, CA 94102.

Next Steps

    After comments are received from the public and reviewing agencies, 
GSA may 1. Give environmental approval to the Project by signing a ROD 
no sooner than 30 days after the FEIS is issued. In the ROD, GSA will 
explain all the factors that were considered in reaching its final 
decision, including the environmental factors. GSA will identify the 
environmentally preferable alternative or alternatives and may select 
one of the alternatives or a combination of alternatives analyzed in 
the EIS. 2. Undertake additional environmental studies, or 3. Abandon 
the Project.
    If the Project is given environmental approval and funding is 
appropriated, the GSA could design and construct all or part of the 
Project.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Osmahn A. Kadri, NEPA Project Manager, 
General Services Administration at 415-522-3617. Please also call this 
number if special assistance is needed to attend and participate in the 
public meeting.

    Dated: February 6, 2019.
Matthew Jear,
Director, Portfolio Management Division, Pacific Rim Region, Public 
Buildings Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-02205 Filed 2-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-YF-P