Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Emissions Inventory for the Missouri Jackson County and Jefferson County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard Nonattainment Areas, 3703-3705 [2019-02068]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 15, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Feb 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 20, 2018.
James O. Payne,
Acting Deputy Regional Administrator,
Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.2585 is amended by
adding paragraph (ff) to read as follows:
■
Control strategy: Ozone.
*
*
*
*
(ff) Approval—On April 17, 2017, as
supplemented on January 23, 2018,
Wisconsin submitted a revision to its
State Implementation Plan along with a
prior submission on August 15, 2016, to
satisfy the emissions statement,
emission inventory, reasonable further
progress (RFP), RFP contingency
measure, oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
reasonably available control technology
(RACT), motor vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M), and transportation
conformity requirements for the
Wisconsin portion of the Chicago area
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS moderate
nonattainment plan. These elements of
the plan meet the requirements of
section 110 and part D of the CAA for
the Wisconsin portion of the Chicago
area, which was reclassified on May 4,
2016, as moderate nonattainment for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. The April 17,
2017, submittal as supplemented on
January 23, 2018, also established new
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets
(MVEB) for volatile organic compounds
(VOC) and NOX for the years 2017 and
2018. The MVEBs for the Wisconsin
portion of the Chicago 2008 ozone
NAAQS nonattainment area, which is
the portion of Kenosha County inclusive
and east of Interstate 94, are now: 1.56
tons per summer day of VOC emissions
and 3.05 tons per summer day of NOX
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2019–02057 Filed 2–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0700; FRL–9988–46–
Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri;
Emissions Inventory for the Missouri
Jackson County and Jefferson County
2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient
Air Quality Standard Nonattainment
Areas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
■
*
emissions for the year 2017, and 1.44
tons per summer day of VOC emissions
and 2.75 tons per summer day of NOX
emissions for the year 2018.
AGENCY:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.2585
3703
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving two
submissions from the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources
(MoDNR) revising the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
of Missouri. The SIP revision
submissions address the Clean Air Act
(CAA) section 172 requirement to
submit a base year emissions inventory
for Missouri’s partial Jackson County
and partial Jefferson County
nonattainment areas of the 2010 1-hour
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0700. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracey Casburn, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219, by
telephone at (913) 551–7016, or by
email at casburn.tracey@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
3704
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
I. What action is the EPA taking?
II. The EPA’s Response to Comments
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is approving two SIP
revision submissions from the MoDNR
addressing the CAA section 172(c)(3)
requirement to submit a base year
emissions inventory for Missouri’s
partial Jackson County and partial
Jefferson County nonattainment areas of
the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. The EPA
is finalizing its determination that these
emission inventory SIP revision
submissions were submitted in
accordance with sections 110, 191(a),
and 172(c)(3) of the CAA. On November
23, 2018, the EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking proposing to
approve the emissions inventories in the
Federal Register. See 83 FR 59348. The
public comment period opened on
November 23, 2018 (the date of the
proposed rule’s publication in the
Federal Register) and closed on
December 24, 2018.
II. The EPA’s Response to Comments
The EPA received comments in
response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking (see the docket for this
action). The comments address subjects
outside the scope of the proposed
action, do not explain (or provide a legal
basis for) how the proposed action
should differ in any way, and make no
specific mention of the proposed action.
Therefore, the comments are not
germane, and the EPA is not providing
response.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: December 28, 2018.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart—AA Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding entries ‘‘(76)’’
and ‘‘(77)’’ in numerical order to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS
Name of nonregulatory SIP
provision
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
State submittal
date
*
*
*
(76) Jackson County 1-Hour Jackson County .................
SO2 NAA Baseline Emissions Inventory.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Feb 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
*
10/15/2015
Fmt 4700
EPA approval date
*
2/13/2019, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
Explanation
*
*
[EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0700; FRL–
9988–46–Region 7].
13FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
3705
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS—Continued
Name of nonregulatory SIP
provision
(77) Jefferson County 1Hour SO2 NAA Baseline
Emissions Inventory.
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
Jefferson County ................
[FR Doc. 2019–02068 Filed 2–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0073; FRL–9989–22–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; South Carolina:
Revisions to Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving portions of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of South
Carolina, through the South Carolina
Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SC DHEC), on
September 5, 2017, that seek to revise
certain New Source Review (NSR)
regulations regarding the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD)
permitting program. EPA is finalizing
this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on March
15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2018–0073. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Feb 12, 2019
State submittal
date
Jkt 247001
6/1/2015
EPA approval date
2/13/2019, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers can be
reached via telephone at (404) 562–9089
or via electronic mail at akers.brad@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA taking?
On September 5, 2017, SC DHEC
submitted a SIP revision to EPA for
approval that involves changes to South
Carolina’s NSR permitting regulations to
make them consistent with federal
requirements for NSR permitting,
correct typographical errors, make
internal references consistent, and
update public noticing procedures.1
These changes include revisions to NSR
public notice requirements in SC DHEC
Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 7—
‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) at sections (q) and (w)(4) to
address the federal rule entitled
‘‘Revisions to Public Notice Provisions
in Clean Air Act Permitting Programs,’’
Final Rule, 81 FR 71613 (October 18,
2016) (also referred to as the e-Notice
Rule). In this final action, EPA is
approving the SIP revision that makes
changes to South Carolina’s NSR
regulations at SC DHEC Regulation 61–
62.5, Standard No. 7 which applies to
the construction or modification of any
major stationary source in areas
designated as attainment or
1 Also on September 5, 2017, South Carolina
submitted separate SIP revisions with: Changes to
Regulation 61–62.1, Section I—‘‘Definitions’’ and
Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5.2—‘‘Control of
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx);’’ the adoption of
Regulation 61–62.97—‘‘Cross State Air Pollution
Rule (CSAPR) Trading Program;’’ and changes to
the regional haze SIP. The SIP revision related to
Regulation 61–62.97 (CSAPR) was previously
approved on October 13, 2017 (82 FR 47939). EPA
will address the remaining SIP revisions in separate
actions.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
[EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0700; FRL–
9988–46–Region 7].
unclassifiable as required by part C of
title I of the CAA, with the exception of
the portions of the SIP revision related
to the e-Notice Rule. EPA has addressed
the e-notice portions of the SIP revision
in a separate action on December 14,
2018 (83 FR 64285).
EPA is approving changes submitted
in South Carolina’s September 5, 2017,
SIP revision to modify the PSD
regulations to make minor edits for
internal consistency and to adopt
changes for consistency with EPA’s
2016 permit rescission rule entitled
‘‘Rescission of Preconstruction Permits
Issued Under the Clean Air Act’’ Final
Rule, 81 FR 78043 (November 7, 2016).
On September 21, 2018 (83 FR 47855),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to
approve the portions of South Carolina’s
SIP revision described in Section II, of
this preamble. The details of South
Carolina’s SIP revision and the rationale
for EPA’s actions are further explained
in the NPRM. EPA received no adverse
comments on the proposed approval.
II. Analysis of South Carolina’s
Submittal
The September 5, 2017, SIP revision
makes several changes to Regulation 61–
62.5, Standard No. 7 at section (w)—
entitled ‘‘Permit rescission’’—to be
consistent with the federal provisions
for rescinding PSD permits.2 Paragraph
(w)(1) currently states that PSD permits
issued pursuant to Standard No. 7
remain in effect until they expire or are
rescinded. This subparagraph is revised
in South Carolina’s submittal to clarify
that section (w) is the only provision
under which permit rescission is
allowed. Next, paragraph (w)(2) is
revised to remove the date restriction
that limits rescission to PSD permits
issued under PSD rules in effect on or
before July 30, 1987. South Carolina’s
revised language is consistent with the
federal Permit Rescission Rule, allowing
for permit rescission if the permit meets
the requirement of paragraph (w)(3).
Finally, paragraph (w)(3) is revised to
change the word ‘‘shall’’ to ‘‘may’’ to
clarify that this provision does not
2 South Carolina also revised Regulation 61–62.5,
Standard No. 7 at paragraph (w)(4) to address EPA’s
eNotice Rule. As discussed above, EPA has
addressed this change in a separate action.
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3703-3705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02068]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2018-0700; FRL-9988-46-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Emissions Inventory for the Missouri
Jackson County and Jefferson County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National
Ambient Air Quality Standard Nonattainment Areas
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving two
submissions from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MoDNR)
revising the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State of Missouri.
The SIP revision submissions address the Clean Air Act (CAA) section
172 requirement to submit a base year emissions inventory for
Missouri's partial Jackson County and partial Jefferson County
nonattainment areas of the 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2018-0700. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracey Casburn, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219, by telephone at (913) 551-7016, or by
email at casburn.tracey@epa.gov.
[[Page 3704]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
I. What action is the EPA taking?
II. The EPA's Response to Comments
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is approving two SIP revision submissions from the MoDNR
addressing the CAA section 172(c)(3) requirement to submit a base year
emissions inventory for Missouri's partial Jackson County and partial
Jefferson County nonattainment areas of the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS. The EPA is finalizing its determination that these emission
inventory SIP revision submissions were submitted in accordance with
sections 110, 191(a), and 172(c)(3) of the CAA. On November 23, 2018,
the EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking proposing to approve
the emissions inventories in the Federal Register. See 83 FR 59348. The
public comment period opened on November 23, 2018 (the date of the
proposed rule's publication in the Federal Register) and closed on
December 24, 2018.
II. The EPA's Response to Comments
The EPA received comments in response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking (see the docket for this action). The comments address
subjects outside the scope of the proposed action, do not explain (or
provide a legal basis for) how the proposed action should differ in any
way, and make no specific mention of the proposed action. Therefore,
the comments are not germane, and the EPA is not providing response.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: December 28, 2018.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart--AA Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding
entries ``(76)'' and ``(77)'' in numerical order to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Nonregulatory SIP Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of nonregulatory SIP geographic or State EPA approval date Explanation
provision nonattainment area submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(76) Jackson County 1-Hour SO2 Jackson County.... 10/15/2015 2/13/2019, [Insert [EPA-R07-OAR-2018-0700;
NAA Baseline Emissions Federal Register FRL-9988-46-Region 7].
Inventory. citation].
[[Page 3705]]
(77) Jefferson County 1-Hour Jefferson County.. 6/1/2015 2/13/2019, [Insert [EPA-R07-OAR-2018-0700;
SO2 NAA Baseline Emissions Federal Register FRL-9988-46-Region 7].
Inventory. citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-02068 Filed 2-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
