National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Applications and Program Updates, 3324-3338 [2019-01339]
Download as PDF
3324
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART TTTT OF PART 63—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART TTTT—Continued
General provisions citation
Subject of citation
Applies to
subpart
Notification of performance
evaluation; notification using
COMS data; notification that
exceeded criterion for relative
accuracy.
Contents ....................................
No ...............
See § 63.5360(a)(2) for CMS requirements.
No ..............
Yes .............
§ 63.5320(d) specifies requirements for the notification of compliance status.
Except for paragraphs of § 63.10 as listed
below.
See § 63.5360 for CMS recordkeeping requirements, except see § 63.5430(h) for CMS recordkeeping requirements if there is a deviation from the standard.
See § 63.5360(a)(2) for CMS recordkeeping requirements.
Applies only if performance testing is performed.
Subpart TTTT has no opacity or visible emission standards.
Applies if a condition of compliance extension.
See § 63.5420(b) for reporting requirements if
there is a deviation from the standard.
See § 63.5360(a)(2) for monitoring requirements.
Applies only if your source uses a flare to control solvent emissions. Subpart TTTT does
not require flares.
§ 63.9(g) ....................................
Additional notifications
using a continuous
toring system (CMS).
§ 63.9(h) ....................................
§ 63.10 ......................................
Notification of compliance status.
Recordkeeping/reporting ...........
§ 63.10(b)(2) ..............................
Recordkeeping ..........................
Schedule for reporting, record
storage.
CMS
recordkeeping;
CMS
records of startup, shutdown,
and malfunction events.
§ 63.10(c) ..................................
Recordkeeping ..........................
Additional CMS recordkeeping
No ..............
§ 63.10(d)(2) ..............................
Reporting ..................................
Yes .............
§ 63.10(d)(3) ..............................
Reporting ..................................
§ 63.10(d)(4) ..............................
§ 63.10(d)(5) ..............................
Reporting ..................................
Reporting ..................................
§ 63.10(e) ..................................
Reporting ..................................
Reporting performance test results.
Reporting opacity or VE observations.
Progress reports .......................
Startup, shutdown, and malfunction reporting.
Additional CMS reports .............
§ 63.11 ......................................
Control device requirements .....
Requirements for flares ............
Yes .............
§ 63.12 ......................................
State authority and delegations
Yes.
§ 63.13 ......................................
State/regional addresses ..........
§ 63.14 ......................................
Incorporation by reference ........
§ 63.15 ......................................
Availability of information and
confidentiality.
State authority to enforce
standards.
Addresses where reports, notifications, and requests are
sent.
Test methods incorporated by
reference.
Public and confidential information.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 122, 124 and 125
[EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0145; FRL9988–87–
OW]
RIN 2040–AF25
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES):
Applications and Program Updates
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
19:18 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
No ...............
Yes .............
No ..............
No ...............
Yes.
Yes.
This final rule is effective on
June 12, 2019.
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0145. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
Yes.
DATES:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing certain
revisions to the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System
permitting regulations proposed on May
18, 2016. The final regulatory changes
are minor and will improve and clarify
the regulations in the following major
categories: Regulatory definitions (‘‘new
discharger’’ and two definitions related
to the discharge of pesticides from
pesticides application); permit
applications; and public notice. This
VerDate Sep<11>2014
No ...............
final rule also updates the EPA contact
information and web addresses for
electronic databases, updates outdated
references to best management practices
guidance documents, and deletes a
provision relating to best practicable
waste treatment technology for publicly
owned treatment works that is no longer
applicable. The final revisions
modernize the NPDES regulations,
promote submission of complete permit
applications, and clarify regulatory
requirements to allow more timely
development of NPDES permits that
protect human health and the
environment.
[FR Doc. 2019–01317 Filed 2–11–19; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
when
moni-
Brief description of requirement
available electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Sylvester, Water Permits Division,
Office of Wastewater Management, Mail
Code 4203M, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564–1279; email address:
sylvester.francis@epa.gov; or Janita
Aguirre, Water Permits Division, Office
of Wastewater Management, Mail Code
4203M, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 566–1149; email address:
aguirre.janita@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
The information presented in this
preamble is organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the Agency taking and
why?
C. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
D. What are the incremental costs and
benefits of this action?
E. How was the final rule developed?
II. Rule Revisions Finalized in This Action
A. Revisions to Part 122
B. Revisions to Part 124
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
C. Revisions to Part 125
III. Rule Revisions Not Finalized in This
Action
IV. Impacts
V. Compliance Dates
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this
action are: The EPA; authorized state,
territorial, and tribal programs; and the
regulated community. This table is not
intended to be exhaustive, rather, it
provides a guide for readers regarding
entities that this action is likely to
regulate.
TABLE I–1—ENTITIES POTENTIALLY
AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL RULE
Category
Examples of potentially affected entities
State, Territorial, and
Indian Tribal
Governments.
States and Territories authorized to administer the
NPDES permitting program; States, Territories,
and Indian Tribes that provide certification under
section 401 of the CWA;
States, Territories, and Indian Tribes that own or
operate treatment works.
Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTWs), municipal separate storm sewer
systems (MS4s), or other
municipal entities required
to apply for or seek coverage under an NPDES
individual or general permit and to perform routine
monitoring as a condition
of an NPDES permit.
Municipalities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
3325
TABLE I–1—ENTITIES POTENTIALLY community of approximately $2,389,889
AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL RULE— and 17,912 hours annually.
Continued
E. How was the final rule developed?
Examples of potentially affected entities
Category
Industry ..........
Facilities required to apply
for or seek coverage
under an NPDES individual or general permit
and to perform routine
monitoring as a condition
of an NPDES permit.
If you have any questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What action is the Agency taking and
why?
The EPA is finalizing certain minor,
generally clarifying revisions to the
NPDES regulations initially proposed on
May 18, 2016.1 The final regulatory
changes improve and clarify regulations
in the following major categories:
Regulatory definitions (‘‘new
discharger’’ and two definitions related
to the discharge of pesticides from
pesticides application); permit
applications; and public notice. The
final regulatory changes also update the
EPA’s contact information and web
addresses for electronic databases and
outdated references to best management
practices, and delete a provision that is
no longer applicable (40 CFR
125.3(a)(1)(ii), relating to best
practicable waste treatment technology
for publicly owned treatment works). As
a result of this final rule, the NPDES
regulations will promote submission of
complete permit applications, contain
modernized regulatory requirements to
allow more timely development of
NPDES permits that protect human
health and the environment, and be
more clear and effective.
C. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
These regulations are promulgated
pursuant to the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq., in particular, CWA
sections 301, 304(i), 308, 402 and 501.
D. What are the incremental costs and
benefits of this action?
This final rule promulgates minor,
generally clarifying revisions to the
NPDES regulations. The EPA has
estimated that the revisions finalized in
this action will result in an overall
burden decrease to permitting
authorities and the regulated
1 81
PO 00000
FR 31343.
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In developing this final rule, the EPA
considered the public comments and
feedback received from stakeholders on
the May 18, 2016 proposal (hereafter
referred to as the Proposed Rule). The
EPA provided a 75-day public comment
period after the Proposed Rule was
published in the Federal Register.
Over 450 organizations and
individuals submitted comments on a
range of issues. The EPA received an
additional 14,438 letters from
individuals associated with mass letter
writing campaigns. Some comments
addressed issues beyond the scope of
the proposed rulemaking; however, the
EPA did not contemplate expanding the
scope of the rulemaking or making
regulatory changes to address the
substance of these comments. In each
section of this preamble, the EPA
discusses significant public comments
so that the public is fully aware of the
Agency’s basis for the final rule. For a
full response to these and all other
comments, see the EPA’s Response to
Comments document in the official
public docket for this rulemaking.
In addition, the EPA met with all
stakeholders who requested time to
discuss the contents of the proposed
rule. Records of each meeting are
included in the official public docket.
II. Rule Revisions Finalized in This
Action
The EPA has created a comparison
document showing the revisions to the
current NPDES regulations made by this
final rule, and a second document
showing the revisions made between the
proposed and final rule. The EPA has
posted both documents at: https://
www.epa.gov/npdes/npdes-applicationand-program-updates, and placed them
in the docket for today’s rule.
A. Revisions to Part 122
1. Purpose and Scope (Note to 40 CFR
122.1)—NPDES Contact Information
The EPA is finalizing the correction to
the Note to 40 CFR 122.1, NPDES
contact information, to delete outdated
references to program contact
information that are no longer accurate.
The final Note also includes the
updated website address for the NPDES
homepage, https://www.epa.gov/npdes/.
The EPA received one public
comment associated with this revision.
The comment expressed support for the
effort to remove the outdated
information and questioned whether the
EPA could remove the Note entirely or
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
3326
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
provide a more generic approach than
including specific contact information
that requires a rulemaking to update.
While it is true that the Note to 40 CFR
122.1 could be deleted entirely or
generically updated, the EPA’s view is
that providing up-to-date contact
information in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) will save the
permitting authorities and the public
time when they seek to contact the EPA
about these regulations. For instance, if
the Note were deleted entirely, an
interested party who is used to the
information appearing in the regulatory
text may spend unnecessary time
searching the internet and navigating
the EPA’s website for NPDES
information. Instead, the EPA is
retaining the Note and including the upto-date NPDES homepage to provide a
direct link for interested parties to find
the EPA’s NPDES-related information
about a particular issue or program area.
2. NPDES Program Definitions (40 CFR
122.2)
(a) Pesticide Discharges to Waters of the
United States From Pesticide
Application
In 2009, the Court of Appeals in
National Cotton Council, et al. v. EPA,
553 F.3d 927 (6th Cir. 2009) found that
point source discharges of biological
pesticides and chemical pesticides that
leave a residue to waters of the United
States (U.S.) are pollutants under the
CWA and therefore require NPDES
permits. In response, the EPA issued the
first Pesticide General Permit on
October 31, 2011 and reissued the
permit on October 24, 2016.2 The
Proposed Rule added a definition of
‘‘pesticide applications to waters of the
United States’’ to ensure the NPDES
regulations are consistent with the 6th
Circuit decision as implemented by the
Agency’s Pesticide General Permit. In
this action, the EPA includes a final
definition for ‘‘Pesticide discharges to
waters of the United States from
pesticide application,’’ as well as a
regulatory definition for ‘‘pesticide
residue.’’
The comments received on the
proposal were mixed. Many comments
requested additional language
clarifications in order to be consistent
with the court decision and to avoid
confusion regarding the issue of
whether or not pesticides must leave a
residue to qualify as pollutants
2 See https://www.epa.gov/npdes/pesticidepermitting. The EPA’s Pesticide General Permit
applies only to areas and activities where states are
not authorized to administer the NPDES program.
Authorized states develop and issue their own
permits for pesticide discharges to waters of the
United States from pesticide application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
requiring permit coverage under the
NPDES program. One comment
requested that the EPA include
definitions for ‘‘biological pesticides,’’
‘‘chemical pesticides,’’ and ‘‘pesticide
residue.’’
In response to the comments received,
this final rule includes minor wording
changes from the proposal to use
NPDES regulatory terminology such as
‘‘discharge’’ and to change ‘‘pesticide
application’’ to ‘‘discharges to waters of
the United States from pesticide
application’’ to better reflect current
NPDES terminology, which is used in
both the 6th Circuit decision and the
EPA’s Pesticide General Permit. Based
on the comments received, this final
rule also includes a regulatory
definition of the term ‘‘pesticide
residue’’ for purposes of clarifying
which discharges to waters of the U.S.
from the application of pesticides
require NPDES permits. The EPA is not
adding a regulatory definition for
‘‘biological pesticide’’ 3 in 40 CFR 122.2
because this concept and relevant
regulatory definitions are already
included in 40 CFR 174.3, 40 CFR
158.2000(a)(1), and 40 CFR 158.2100(b).
This definition in the final rule
provides that the term ‘‘pesticide
residue’’ in 40 CFR 122.2 includes the
portion of a pesticides application that
is discharged from a point source to
waters of the U.S. and no longer
provides pesticidal benefits. It also
includes any degradates of the pesticide.
This definition is identical to the
definition of ‘‘pesticide residue’’ already
used in the EPA’s Pesticide General
Permit.
By including the final definitions
related to pesticide discharges to waters
of the U.S. in the comprehensive NPDES
definitions at 40 CFR 122.2, the
regulations have increased clarity and
consistency regarding discharges
regulated under the CWA and therefore
require NPDES permits. The final
definitions do not change which
pesticide discharges are subject to
NPDES permitting.
(b) New Discharger
The EPA is finalizing the proposed
correction of a typographical error in
paragraph (d) of the New Discharger
definition to change ‘‘NDPES’’ to
‘‘NPDES.’’ The EPA received no public
comments associated with this revision.
3 This term, also called biopesticides, includes
microbial pesticides, biochemical pesticides, and
plant-incorporated protectants.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3. Changes to Existing NPDES Permit
Application Requirements (40 CFR
122.21)
The CWA directs the Administrator to
‘‘promulgate guidelines for the purpose
of establishing uniform application
forms,’’ and minimum requirements for
the acquisition of information from
owners and operators of point-sources
of discharge. 33 U.S.C. 1314(i). The EPA
regulations at 40 CFR part 122
implement this requirement. The EPA
proposed specific revisions to clarify
and update the permit application
requirements in 40 CFR 122.21. In this
action, the EPA is finalizing the
revisions to the permit application
requirements, as described in the
following sections, to update and
improve application consistency,
accuracy, and usability.
The EPA regulations establish permit
application requirements and
corresponding forms for use by all
applicants for EPA-issued individual
permits. Accordingly, the EPA has
updated the eight application forms
consistent with the final requirements
addressed in this final rule.4 An
authorized state program may choose to
use the EPA’s forms or develop its own
application forms; however, an
authorized program’s forms must collect
all of the information that the Agency’s
regulations require.5
In the Proposed Rule, the EPA
indicated that it had established a
separate docket (EPA–HQ–OW–2016–
0146) to receive comments on potential
future changes to the application forms
and information requests. Specifically,
the EPA solicited comment on whether
and how a separate future action should
address the utility and clarity of the
information requests and on how to
minimize the information collection
burden on respondents, including the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of
information technology (see 81 FR
31367, May 18, 2016). The EPA did not
receive any substantive comments that
identified duplication, redundancy or
other ways to reduce burden associated
with the forms that have not been
otherwise discussed and/or addressed
in this rulemaking.
(a) NPDES Contact Information (40 CFR
122.21(a)(2))
The EPA is finalizing the correction to
40 CFR 122.21(a)(2) to update contact
information for obtaining application
4 For more information about the NPDES
application forms and their history, see the
preamble to the proposed rule: 81 FR 31345–31346
(May 18, 2016) and 81 FR 31349 (May 18, 2016).
5 40 CFR 122.21(a)(2)(iv).
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
forms, as proposed. The final provision
deletes outdated references to program
contact information, and includes the
updated website address for the NPDES
homepage, https://www.epa.gov/npdes.
The EPA received no public comments
associated with this revision. In general,
it is the EPA’s view that providing upto-date contact information in the CFR
will save the permitting authorities and
the public time when they seek to
contact the EPA about these regulations.
For instance, if this information were
not provided in the regulation, an
interested party may spend unnecessary
time searching the internet and
navigating the EPA’s website for NPDES
information. Instead, the EPA is
providing updated contact information
for parties interested in obtaining the
NPDES application forms.
(b) Industrial Classification Codes (40
CFR 122.21(f)(3))
The EPA is finalizing the revisions to
the requirements at 40 CFR 122.21(f)(3),
for all facilities except POTWs and
treatment works treating domestic
sewage (TWTDSs), to include North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) codes,6 in addition to
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
codes,7 that reflect the products or
services provided by the facility.
Most comments received either
supported or did not oppose the
proposed requirement to include NAICS
codes. While generally supporting the
revision, several comments questioned
why the EPA proposed to require
submission of both SIC and NAICS
codes, suggesting instead that the
Agency should require one or the other,
or provide flexibility to choose which
code to submit. Some comments also
expressed concern and requested
clarification about the overall timing
and transition process from SIC codes to
NAICS codes.
The EPA’s intent with the proposed
rulemaking was to require both SIC and
NAICS codes, as both codes provide
useful information. For example, SIC
codes are referenced in several Effluent
Limitations Guidelines regulations that
serve as the basis for effluent limitations
in NPDES permits. While the EPA may
elect to replace those SIC codes with
NAICS codes at some point in the
6 NAICS code numbers and descriptions in the
North American Industrial Classification System
Manual prepared by the Executive Office of the
President, Office of Management and Budget can be
found online at: https://www.census.gov/eos/www/
naics/.
7 SIC code numbers and descriptions in the 1987
Standard Industrial Classification Manual prepared
by the Executive Office of the President, Office of
Management and Budget can be found online at:
https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/sic_manual.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
future, the SIC code is currently a
critical piece of information needed for
NPDES permitting purposes.8 While the
older SIC codes are still referenced in
other regulations, NAICS codes are now
the federal data standard typically used
to identify and classify industrial
operations.9 Although the NAICS codes
are not directly linked to most CWA
implementing regulations, they are the
recommended industry classification
system in OMB’s Statistical Policy
Directive No. 8, and NAICS codes have
effectively replaced SIC codes, which
have not been updated since 1987. Use
of the NAICS codes as the data standard
across all federal data systems ensures
consistency in assessments conducted
across multiple federal databases. Use of
the NAICS codes also allows the NPDES
permit program to reflect the evolution
of industries to which dischargers
belong.
In many cases there is a one-to-one
crosswalk between the SIC and NAICS
codes; however, this is not always true.
[Note: The United States Census Bureau
provides online resources connecting
SIC and NAICS codes: https://
www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/
concordances/concordances.html.]
Given that some CWA regulations use
SIC codes, both codes remain important
for permitting and data tracking
purposes. Therefore, the final rule will
require an applicant to provide both SIC
and NAICS codes on application forms.
After changes are made in the future to
replace SIC code references in other
CWA regulations, the EPA will evaluate
revisiting the application forms to
remove or revise the SIC code
requirements.
(c) New Discharger Data Submission (40
CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi), 40 CFR
122.21(j)(4)(i), and 40 CFR
122.21(j)(5)(i))
Because they have not commenced
discharge, applications for new
dischargers require submission of
estimates of the types and quantities of
pollutants discharged. The regulations
for non-POTWs require submission of
actual effluent data (consistent with the
effluent characterization data required
in the applications for existing
dischargers) no later than 24 months
after the discharge has commenced. In
the EPA’s Proposed Rule, the Agency
sought to revise application
requirements for new dischargers, both
POTWs and non-POTWs, to require the
8 For example, see 40 CFR 414.11(a) which
establishes effluent limitations guidelines
subcategories using the 1987 SIC categories.
9 See ‘‘North American Industry Classification
System United States, 2017’’ Executive Office of the
President, Office of Management and Budget, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3327
submission of effluent data that is
required in the application for an
existing discharger within 18 months
from the commencement of discharge.
For non-POTWs, the proposal shortened
the period from 24 months to 18
months, and for POTWs, the proposal
created the requirement for the first
time. The revision sought to ensure that
dischargers submit the required effluent
data in a manner that is timely and
consistent. Providing follow-up effluent
data allows the permit writer to evaluate
any discrepancies between estimated or
anticipated effluent characteristics
estimated and reported by the applicant
prior to the commencement of
discharge, and the effluent
characteristics based on actual effluent
data after the commencement of
discharge.
In the proposed rulemaking, the EPA
envisioned three months for a facility’s
treatment system to be operating
efficiently, one year of sampling, and
another three months to report data. The
EPA received mixed comments on the
proposed revisions to 40 CFR
122.21(k)(5)(vi), 40 CFR 122.21(j)(4)(i),
and 40 CFR 122.21(j)(5)(i). Multiple
comments generally supported the
proposed revisions and one comment
suggested that the timeframe should be
shortened from the proposed 18 months
to 16 months by reducing the time to
report data from three months to one
month. On the other hand, several
comments objected to shortening the
timeframe from 24 months to 18 months
for new industrial (non-POTW)
dischargers. They argued that 24 months
is necessary for optimizing facility
operation and gathering and reporting
representative data. One commenter
pointed to examples in other
rulemakings, such as the EPA’s steam
electric power sector effluent limitation
standards and guidelines,10 where the
need for significant facility startup and
optimization time is documented.
Additionally, one comment suggested
that many treatment systems are
affected by rainfall or are dependent on
biological treatment that takes longer
than three months to establish and
optimize. Another commenter suggested
that 24 months is a more suitable
timeframe for new POTWs as well,
suggesting that it provides a more
complete data set, representing close to
two full annual cycles that account for
potential seasonal fluctuations and their
impacts on effluent quality and flow
variability.
10 Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards
for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point
Source Category, 80 FR 67837 (November 3, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
3328
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
When the EPA first established 11 the
non-POTW requirement at 40 CFR
122.21(k)(5)(vi) and the corresponding
requirements in application Form 2D
(for new sources and new dischargers),
the Agency considered a range of
options for the submission of ‘‘followup data.’’ The range of options the EPA
considered included requiring no
additional information at all to requiring
the submission of Form 2C (applicable
to existing dischargers) after
commencement of the discharge. When
the EPA first established the
requirement to provide follow-up data
no later than two years after
commencement of discharge, the
Agency received no negative comments
and the provision was generally
supported. At that time, some
commenters suggested that a ‘‘steady
state’’ or optimized operations for nonPOTWs may not be reached within one
year’s time and 24 months was therefore
more appropriate.
As the Agency did in 1984 and 1986,
the EPA continues to take into
consideration the needs of industry for
regulatory certainty and the possible
necessity for adjusting permit limits
after operation commences to protect
human health and the environment. As
a result, after evaluating the comments
received, the EPA is retaining the 24month requirement for non-POTWs to
submit effluent data after the
commencement of discharge and is not
finalizing the proposed revision to 40
CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi) to reduce the
requirement to 18 months. As suggested
by commenters, the additional six
months could strengthen the quality of
information submitted to the Agency.
The EPA is finalizing, in this action,
the editorial changes to 40 CFR
122.21(k)(5)(vi) to remove the reference
to a permit holder’s presumed gender,
as well as correcting the reference to the
correct application form—Form 2C. In
addition, after evaluating the comments
received, and for the reasons discussed
above in the context of new non-POTW
dischargers, the EPA is finalizing
revisions to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(4)(i) and
40 CFR 122.21(j)(5)(i) with
modifications to require submission of
follow-up data for new POTWs no later
than 24 months after commencement of
the discharge. Further details regarding
the Agency’s basis for these actions may
be found in the Response to Comment
document.
11 The EPA first proposed 40 CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi)
on October 1, 1984 (49 FR 38812) and first finalized
the 24-month requirement on July 28, 1986 (51 FR
26982).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
(d) Data Age for Permit Renewal (40
CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix))
The EPA proposed a new paragraph
(ix) to 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7), to mirror the
existing language of 40 CFR
122.21(j)(4)(vi) and (vii), which is
applicable to POTWs, and
corresponding Form 2A. Proposed
paragraph 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix)
would have been applicable to
industrial applicants and incorporated
into Form 2C. The existing regulation
for POTWs at 40 CFR 122.21(j)(4)(vi)
provides that existing data may be used,
if available, in lieu of sampling done
solely for the purpose of the application.
Additionally, 40 CFR 122.21(j)(4)(vii)
provides that for POTWs, existing data
for specified pollutants collected within
four and one-half years of the
application must be included in the
pollutant data summary by the
applicant. It also provides that if
sampling for a specific pollutant is done
monthly or more frequently, it is only
necessary to summarize all data
collected within one year of the
application. For the purpose of
consistency, the EPA sought to adopt
the same conditions on the use of
existing data in lieu of sampling data
collected solely for the purposes of the
application for industrial applicants
through the proposed 40 CFR
122.21(g)(7)(ix). The proposed
requirement would have superseded the
instructions to current Form 2C,
applicable to industrial applicants,
which provide flexibility to use existing
data, but subject to different conditions.
The Form 2C instructions provide that
data from samples taken in the past may
be used in lieu of the otherwise required
sampling for application purposes if the
samples meet all data requirements, all
samples were taken no more than three
years before application submission,
and all data are representative of the
present discharge.
The EPA received several comments
on the proposed addition of 40 CFR
122.21(g)(7)(ix) (and conforming
changes to the substance of Form 2C).
Comments focused on the three years
versus four and one-half years for
acceptable data age, whether the oneyear of summary data provision should
be allowed, what constitutes
representative samples, and general
suggestions attempting to make the rule
clearer.
After reviewing public comment, the
EPA has decided to finalize its proposal
to allow the use of data collected up to
four and one-half years prior to the date
of permit application, but has decided
not to finalize other proposed elements
in 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) due to
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
differences in data reporting
requirements for POTWs in Form 2A
and non-POTWs in Form 2C
Specifically, commenters noted that
the proposed revisions to 40 CFR
122.21(g)(7)(ix) required that ‘‘All
existing data . . . that is collected
within four and one-half years of the
application must be included in the
pollutant data summary submitted by
the applicant.’’ Commenters noted that
this requirement was not consistent
with the NPDES recordkeeping
requirement at 40 CFR 122.41(j)(2),
which requires that most effluent
monitoring data be retained for three
years. Further, commenters noted that
the use of the term ‘‘summary data’’ that
was appropriate in the context of
reporting under the POTW application
requirements, was confusing with
respect to the data reporting format
required for non-POTWs in Form 2C.
With respect to the proposed revision
that non-POTW applicants ‘‘must’’
provide all data from the past four and
one-half years, the EPA agrees that the
proposed requirement is inconsistent
with the existing recordkeeping
requirements, and has revised the
provision to track the long-standing
language in the instructions to Form C.
The final data age provision at 40 CFR
122.21(g)(7)(ix) allows applicants to use
data up to four and one-half years, but
does not require four and one-half years
of data. As discussed in the preamble to
the proposed rule, the EPA has
determined that the four and one-half
year data age allowance, rather than the
three-year allowance mentioned only in
the existing Form 2C instructions,
provides applicants with additional
flexibility and a more practical
timeframe (i.e., their previous five-year
permit term minus the 180-day
application period) for collection of
effluent characterization data. This four
and one-half year timeframe has been in
place for POTWs since the revisions to
Form 2A were promulgated in 1999, and
the EPA has seen no problems
associated with this existing POTW
requirement.
Consistent with the language from the
existing Form 2C application
instructions, the final provision at 40
CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) also clarifies that
existing data may only be used where
they remain representative of the
current discharge characteristics. With
respect to comments regarding whether
data are ‘‘representative’’ of the
discharge, the EPA considers the
discussion and examples included in
the existing and revised instructions to
the application forms to provide the
appropriate level of detail.
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
The final regulatory provision at 40
CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) also removes the
term ‘‘summary data’’ which the EPA
agrees is unnecessary and confusing
with respect to the data reporting format
in Form 2C.
(e) Reporting Electronic Mail Address
The EPA is finalizing revisions to the
following paragraphs in 40 CFR 122.21
to request the applicant’s electronic
mailing address (email) as proposed: 40
CFR 122.21(c)(2)(ii)(B), 40 CFR
122.21(f)(4), 40 CFR 122.21(j)(1)(ii), 40
CFR 122.21(j)(1)(viii)(2) and (3), 40 CFR
122.21(j)(9), 40 CFR 122.21(q)(1)(i), 40
CFR 122.21(q)(2)(i), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(8)(vi)(A), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(9)(iii)(D) and (E), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(9)(iv)(A), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(10)(ii)(A), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(10)(iii)(K)(1), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(11)(ii)(A), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(12)(i), and 40 CFR
122.21(q)(13). The EPA received one
public comment associated with these
revisions. The comment expressed
general support for these revisions, and
did not contain any substantive
comments requiring the EPA’s response.
(f) Reporting Numbers of Significant
Industrial Users (SIUs) and NonSignificant Categorical Industrial Users
(NSCIUs)
The CWA directs the EPA to publish
‘‘regulations establishing pretreatment
standards for introduction of pollutants
into treatment works’’ (33 U.S.C. 1317).
Under the NPDES regulations at 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6), POTW permit applicants
must provide certain information for
SIUs that discharge to the treatment
works (33 U.S.C. 1314(i) and 1317).
SIUs are either industrial dischargers
that: Deliver either large volumes (daily
average of 25,000 gallons or more) of
wastewater to the POTW for final
treatment, are subject to Categorical
Pretreatment Standards (known as
categorical industrial users or ‘‘CIUs’’),
or both. The wastewater from these
facilities may affect the operation and
performance of the POTW, and may
contain pollutants that are otherwise
uncharacteristic of domestic sewage. In
the Proposed Rule, the EPA proposed
revisions to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i) and
(ii) of the NPDES application
regulations to reflect changes in the
definition of SIU in the general
pretreatment regulations at 40 CFR
403.3(v). Before a 2005 regulation which
streamlined the pretreatment
regulations for existing and new sources
(70 FR 60191), all CIUs were defined as
SIUs.12 The 2005 regulation changed the
12 70
FR 60134, October 14, 2005.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
definition to authorize the POTW
Control Authority 13 to determine that
certain CIUs meeting prescribed
conditions could be classified as nonsignificant CIUs (NSCIUs) as opposed to
SIUs. The ability to designate a CIU as
an NSCIU resulted in reduced reporting
requirements for the facility as well as
the control authority because permittees
are not required to report information
about NSCIUs as often.14
In this action, the EPA is finalizing
some of the changes to 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6)(i) identified in the Proposed
Rule. Prior to this final rule, the EPA’s
regulations and application Form 2A
asked for the number of CIUs and the
number of SIUs. By changing the
requirement to report only the number
of SIUs and NSCIUs, instead of CIUs,
the permitting authority will gain a
clearer picture in Form 2A of the
number of CIUs that are designated as
NSCIUs since all CIUs are categorized as
either SIUs or NSCIUs.
While the EPA did not receive any
comments in opposition to this
proposed revision to 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6)(i), the EPA received
comments and questions regarding the
inclusion of the phrase ‘‘trucked or
hauled wastes’’ in its definition of SIU
to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i). By including
this phrase, the EPA intended to clarify
that the reported number should
include not only those SIUs and NSCIUs
directly connected to the POTW, but
also those SIUs and NSCIUs that truck
or haul their wastes to the POTW. This
rule does not change how trucked or
hauled wastes are defined or regulated
under the pretreatment program. Based
on the comments received, the EPA has
modified the final version of the
provision from what was proposed to
clarify that the number of SIUs and
NSCIUs reported on application forms
pursuant to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i)
includes the number of SIUs and
NSCIUs that deliver their waste to the
POTW through means other than direct
13 ‘‘Control authority,’’ defined at 403.3(f), means
a POTW with an approved POTW pretreatment
program; or, in the absence of a POTW pretreatment
program, the authorized state pretreatment program;
or the EPA in the absence of an authorized state
pretreatment program.
14 CIUs must report in June and December each
year (or more frequently) on their continued
compliance with categorical pretreatment standards
and submit those reports to the (pretreatment)
Control Authority. 40 CFR 403.12(e)(1). Significant
non-CIUs (SIUs not subject to categorical
pretreatment standards) must also report similar
information every 6 months to the Control
Authority (403.12(h). Where, however, a facility is
designated as an NSCIU, it need only submit annual
reports certifying that it never discharges more than
100 gallons of total categorical wastewater on any
given day, and information to support that
certification. 40 CFR 403.12(q).
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3329
connection (e.g., pipe), including
delivery via truck or haul.
The EPA received additional
comments regarding the proposed
revisions to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii).
Multiple comments raised the concern
that, as proposed, 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii)
would require POTWs to report detailed
information on a potentially significant
number of CIUs which the control
authority determined to be NSCIUs.
Commenters suggested that this would
increase the reporting burden for the
POTW and would run counter to the
flexibility provided by 40 CFR 403.3(v).
The EPA agrees and is not finalizing
the proposed revision to 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6)(ii) so that the changes in
this final rule carry forward the burden
reduction established by previous
changes to 40 CFR 403.3(v) and
403.12(q). In accordance with 40 CFR
403.3(v) and 403.12(q), the pretreatment
control authority determines that
NSCIUs consistently comply with all
applicable categorical pretreatment
standards, annually submit a
certification and data necessary to
support the certification, and never
discharge any untreated concentrated
wastewater. Additionally, in
determining whether a CIU is an NSCIU,
the control authority must find that the
NSCIU has no reasonable potential for
adversely affecting the POTW’s
operation. Annual reports and
supporting data submitted to the control
authority contain the information
sought in 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii)(A)
through (G). As a result, requiring
POTWs to submit detailed information
for all NSCIUs, as proposed in 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6)(ii), would negate the burden
reduction provided by 403.3(v) and
403.12(q). Therefore, the EPA is not
finalizing the proposed revision to 40
CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii) and is instead
retaining the previous requirements
applicable only to SIUs to provide
specific information. The requirements
in 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii)(A)–(G) to
provide specific information do not
apply to NSCIUs.
(g) Cooling Water Intake Structure
Indication (40 CFR 122.21(f)(9))
The EPA is finalizing the proposed
revision to add paragraph 40 CFR
122.21(f)(9), with modification. The
final rule requires the applicant to
indicate whether the facility uses
cooling water and to specify the source
of the cooling water. The EPA is not
finalizing the parenthetical note
provided in the proposed version of 40
CFR 122.21(f)(9). The EPA has
determined that the explanation about
the applicability of application
requirements under 40 CFR 122.21(r) is
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
3330
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
best placed in the application form
instructions. The parenthetical note to
40 CFR 122.21(f)(9) in the proposed
rulemaking was not a proposed new
requirement and would have imposed
no new additional requirements.
Most of the public comments received
on this revision were supportive;
however, one comment questioned the
purpose and need for this revision, and
suggested the requirement would create
additional burden and costs on facilities
that use cooling water, but are not
subject to the requirements at 40 CFR
122.21(r). No specific costs or burdens
were shared or suggested by the
commenter.
The EPA agrees that all facilities, not
just those subject to 40 CFR 122.21(r),
would be subject to the requirement to
indicate the use and source of cooling
water; however, the EPA has
determined that this requirement would
not cause undue burden or impose any
significant costs. By requiring indication
of the use and source of cooling water,
a permitting authority will receive key
information necessary to effectively and
efficiently develop an NPDES permit for
the facility. For facilities already
covered by 40 CFR 122.21(r), the final
provision would notify the permitting
authority that the application
information under 40 CFR 122.21(r) is
forthcoming. For facilities that are not
already covered by 40 CFR 122.21(r), the
final provision would provide valuable
information on cooling water intake
structures at minimal burden to the
applicant. The final rule revision does
not alter any existing requirements in 40
CFR 122.21(r) or 40 CFR 125.91.
h. Indication of Requests for
Technology-Based Variances (40 CFR
122.21(f) and 122.21(j))
The EPA is finalizing revisions, as
proposed, to 40 CFR 122.21(f) and
122.21(j) to require applicants to
indicate whether they are requesting
any of the technology-based variances
allowed under 40 CFR 122.21(m) for
non-POTWs and 40 CFR 122.21(n) for
POTWs.
While some public comments
received on this revision expressed
support, other comments suggested that
there may be instances where it would
not be known whether a technologybased variance would be requested at
the time of application.
The final rule ensures the permitting
authority is aware of a technology-based
variance request, if known, at the time
of permit application, which will enable
the permitting authority to more
effectively and efficiently coordinate
with the applicant and appropriate
regulators on the technology-based
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
variance request. The EPA
acknowledges that there may be some
instances where an applicant will not
yet know at the time of application
whether they will request a technologybased variance. The final rule does not
and is not intended to limit an
applicant’s ability to request a
technology-based variance only to the
time of application. The final rule does
not alter any existing requirements in 40
CFR 122.21(m) or 40 CFR 122.21(n), and
an applicant continues to be able to
request a technology-based variance
consistent with existing statutory and
regulatory requirements.
4. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
(40 CFR 122.44(k)(4))
The EPA is finalizing the correction to
the Note to 40 CFR 122.44(k)(4), Best
Management Practices (BMPs), as
proposed to delete outdated references
to information sources that are no longer
available. The final Note also includes
the website address where updated BMP
information is contained to ensure that
the most current BMP guidance is
provided.
The EPA received several comments
on the proposed correction, including
those from a municipality, trade
associations, an authorized state NPDES
program, and a state association. Several
of the comments recommended that the
listed BMP guidance documents be
replaced by a general reference to the
website where updated BMP guidance
documents are contained to ensure that
the most current BMP guidance is
provided. One commenter also felt that
listing some but not all documents in
the note could imply that the included
documents are preferred by the EPA,
when others may be just or more
appropriate for use by states. While the
EPA agrees that the list of documents is
not exhaustive, the Agency has
maintained the list of existing guidance
document titles and associated EPA
publication numbers because it will
save permitting authorities, regulated
entities, and the public time when they
seek these documents by using the EPA
National Service Center for
Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
website (https://www.epa.gov/nscep).
Additionally, existing text in the Note to
40 CFR 122.44(k)(4) makes clear that
updates to the listed documents may
also be available and all guidance
documents are available to the public
through the NSCEP website.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Revisions to Part 124
1. Public Notice Requirements (40 CFR
124.10(c))
The CWA requires that a ‘‘copy of
each permit application and each permit
issued [under 402 of the Act] shall be
available to the public’’ (33 U.S.C.
1342(j)). The CWA also requires that
notice be provided to the public, as well
as any other state whose waters may be
affected, of each NPDES permit
application and that an opportunity be
provided for a public hearing before
ruling on each permit application. 33
U.S.C. 1342(a)(2) and (b)(3). The EPA is
finalizing 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(iv) to
allow permitting authorities to provide
public notice of permitting actions for
NPDES major individual and general
permits on the permitting authority’s
publicly available website in lieu of the
newspaper publication requirement in
40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(i). In addition, the
EPA is finalizing the requirement to
post the draft permit and fact sheet on
the permitting authority’s publicly
available website for the duration of the
public comment period where the
permitting authority chooses to use
online public notice for a draft permit.
However, the EPA is not finalizing the
proposed requirement for a permitting
authority that chooses the option to use
website public notice to additionally
post the final permit, fact sheet and
response to comments on the website
for the entire term of the permit. The
final rule meets the objectives of the
EPA’s proposal, although the EPA made
some changes to the regulatory language
in response to public comments and
after further consideration of the
Agency’s policy objectives and existing
regulatory language. The EPA’s
objectives in the proposal were to
provide permitting authorities with an
alternative method of providing notice
of permit applications and hearings, and
affirm flexibility in reaching the public
through a variety of methods that would
greatly expand public access to
applications and draft permits. In
addition to the substantive changes
described in the following section, the
final rule also includes editorial changes
that are not substantive in nature.
Most of the public comments received
on providing the option for online
posting of public notice via the
permitting authority’s website in lieu of
newspaper publication were supportive.
Some comments urged the EPA to retain
the option of, or require, public notice
in local daily and weekly publications
(e.g., newspapers), citing environmental
justice (EJ) concerns, lack of access to
the internet for certain populations and
communities who do not use the
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
internet for religious or other reasons
(e.g., Amish, Mennonite, and Hutterite)
as the need for public notice in printed
publications. While some comments
suggested that only members of the
public already aware of where to seek
information about permits would have
easy access to the public notice and
permit documents, many comments also
stated that allowing public notice online
in lieu of printed publications would
result in notice to the broadest possible
audience as well as modernize public
notice options and potentially allow the
permitting authority to save time and
money. After consideration of these
comments, the EPA is finalizing the
option for online public notice for the
NPDES actions described in 40 CFR
124.10(a)(1), as well as the regulatory
note reminding the permitting authority
to ensure that the method(s) of public
notice used effectively informs all
interested communities and allows
access to the permitting process for
those seeking to participate. The EPA
expects that this would include
newspaper notices in areas that
continue to be best served by printed
publications with NPDES-regulated
entities owned or operated by
identifiable populations (e.g., Amish,
Mennonite, and Hutterite) who do not
use certain technologies (e.g., computers
or electricity) and areas known or likely
to include members of identifiable
populations who do not have access to
or use certain technologies. The EPA
also expects that this would include
newspaper notices in areas known or
likely to have limited broadband
internet access, areas with underserved
or economically disadvantaged
communities, areas with prolonged
electrical system outrages, and during
large-scale disasters (e.g., hurricanes).
As noted in the preamble to the
Proposed Rule,15 the EPA has carefully
evaluated the potential effect of this
revision on underserved communities
with EJ concerns. In formulating the
proposal, the EPA consulted a study
conducted by Native Public Media that
found that the primary source for
national and international news among
Native American tribes is the internet.16
Newspapers were listed as only the
third most commonly used source for
news. The EPA also consulted the final
National Environmental Justice
Advisory Council (NEJAC), EJ in
15 81
FR 31359 (May 18, 2016).
Traci L, and Sascha D. Meinrath. ‘‘New
Media, Technology and internet Use in Indian
Country’’ Native Public Media, available at https://
www.atalm.org/sites/default/files/NPM-NAF_New_
Media_Study_2009_small.pdf.
16 Morris,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
Permitting Subgroup Report.17 The
report states that ‘‘[n]otification of the
public by publishing in the legal section
of regional newspapers is antiquated
and ineffective. This method should not
be counted on to communicate, even if
legally required.’’ 18 The NEJAC
specifically listed website postings as a
method to ensure meaningful public
participation. Given, among other
things, the wide availability of the
internet and based on the EJ in
Permitting Subgroup Report’s results,
the EPA concludes that notice via the
internet would be a viable and effective
method of informing the public of the
NPDES actions listed in 40 CFR
124.10(a)(1). Mandating publication of
public notice in newspapers in all cases
was appropriate when 40 CFR
124.10(c)(2)(i) was promulgated in 1982,
12 years before the internet became
widely available for public and
commercial use. Now, however,
websites, along with tailored methods to
ensure they are consulted, are often
more appropriate avenues for widely
disseminating information to the public,
and many states currently supplement
the required newspaper publication by
posting NPDES actions on their
websites.
Further, the purpose of this revision
is to provide permitting authorities with
flexibility in reaching their public in a
way that is most effective for their
communities (e.g., newspaper
publication, internet notice, or a
combination of these methods).
Although neither the CWA nor its
implementing regulations specify the
best or preferred method for providing
notice to the public, 40 CFR 25.3(c)(7)
specifically emphasizes that agencies
should ‘‘use all feasible means to create
opportunities for public participation,
and to stimulate and support
participation.’’ Additionally, 40 CFR
124.10(c)(4) states that public notice of
NPDES actions listed in 40 CFR
124.10(a)(1) shall be given by ‘‘[a]ny
other method reasonably calculated to
give actual notice of the action in
question to the persons potentially
affected by it, including press releases
or any other forum or medium to elicit
public participation.’’ Therefore,
permitting authorities are required to
consider the appropriate method or
methods to best inform and engage with
their public.
Permitting authorities continue to
have the option to publish public
17 See, ‘‘Enhancing Environmental Justice in EPA
Permitting Program.’’ National Environmental
Justice Advisory Council. April 2011, available at
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/201502/documents/ej-in-permitting-report-2011.pdf.
18 Id., p.20.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3331
notices in local daily and weekly
newspaper publications. The EPA’s
decision to allow an option for online
public notice does not alter the existing
requirements of 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(i) if
a permitting authority chooses to
continue the traditional method of
providing notice of an NPDES permit
action in a newspaper publication. To
ensure all interested parties are aware of
permitting authorities’ intended
method(s) of public notification, the
EPA expects permitting authorities to
make their public aware of whether
public notices will be made available
online, both online and in local
newspapers, or solely in local
newspaper publications. In addition, the
EPA’s decision to allow an option for
online public notice does not in any
way affect the requirements of 40 CFR
124.10(c)(1) which require that a copy of
the notice must be mailed directly to
persons who have joined the
appropriate mailing list. 40 CFR
124.10(c)(1)(ix)(C) requires notification
of the public of the opportunity to be
put on the mailing list through periodic
publication in the public press and in
such publications as regional and state
funded newsletters, environmental
bulletins, or state law journals. In
addition, permitting authorities could
clearly advertise on the website or in
print the ability to sign up for
notifications of draft permits via paper
mail or email to ensure that all
interested parties are aware of and
receive effective notification of
permitting actions. Further, the EPA’s
revisions to the public notice
requirements for certain enumerated
actions in 40 CFR 124.10 do not affect
the notice requirements for ‘‘issuance’’
of final permit decisions, and the EPA
is in no way suggesting that internet
posting fulfills the separate final permit
decision notice requirements of 40 CFR
124.15.
Public comments received on the
proposed requirement to post permit
documentation (e.g., final permit, fact
sheet, response to comments) online for
the term of the permit were mixed.
Opposing comments suggested that
maintaining permit documentation
online for the duration of the permit
term would further strain the limited
resources of permitting authorities,
especially related to creating and
maintaining a website and increasing
server storage for archived materials.
Some comments suggested that these
related capital and operating costs
would exceed any cost savings from
foregoing printing the public notice in
local newspaper publications. The EPA
is aware of state and EPA permitting
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
3332
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
authorities that already post final
permits and fact sheets on their websites
for the duration of the permit. The EPA
supports and encourages the
continuation of this additional
transparency; however, based on the
comments received from permitting
authorities concerned with the most
effective use of their resources, the
Agency is not finalizing the requirement
to maintain the permit documentation
on the website for the term of the
permit. Instead, where the permitting
authority opts for online public notice
of a draft permit, as defined in 40 CFR
122.2,19 the draft permit and fact sheet
must be posted on the permitting
authority’s website for the duration of
the public comment period, when the
public’s need for timely access to
permitting documents is the greatest.
This posting is in addition to meeting
the existing requirements in 40 CFR
124.10(d), which outline the required
contents of public notices for all NPDES
actions described in 40 CFR
124.10(a)(1). This additional
requirement for posting draft permits
and fact sheets will ensure that
interested members of the public are not
only aware of the information contained
in the public notice document, but are
able to view the contents of the draft
permit and fact sheet online, as well.
Typically, permitting authorities
provide copies of final permits upon
request.
To be clear, online public notice is an
option for all NPDES actions described
in 40 CFR 124.10(a)(1), which includes
more than draft permits. However, for
the NPDES actions described in 40 CFR
124.10(a)(1) other than draft permits,
there would not be a draft permit or fact
sheet to post on the permitting
authority’s publicly available website
for the duration of the public comment
period. Therefore, the EPA is specifying
in the final rule that the requirement to
post the draft permit and fact sheet on
the website for the duration of the
public comment period applies only for
public notice of draft permits as defined
in 122.2. The EPA expects permitting
authorities using the option for online
public notices to publish the
information in a prominent, clear, and
easily accessible location on their public
website. The EPA notes that in meeting
19 Draft
permit means a document prepared under
40 CFR 124.6 indicating the Director’s tentative
decision to issue or deny, modify, revoke and
reissue, terminate, or reissue a ‘‘permit.’’ A notice
of intent to terminate a permit, and a notice of
intent to deny a permit, as discussed in 40 CFR
124.5, are types of ‘‘draft permits.’’ A denial of a
request for modification, revocation and reissuance,
or termination, as discussed in 40 CFR 124.5, is not
a ‘‘draft permit.’’ A ‘‘proposed permit’’ is not a
‘‘draft permit.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
the requirement to make the draft
permit and fact sheet available for the
duration of the public comment period,
the permitting authority’s website must
clearly include a link to access these
documents, while the actual document
could be hosted elsewhere, such as in a
repository of permit documents.
In the Proposed Rule, the EPA also
requested comments on, but did not
propose specific regulatory text for,
three additional topics related to the
public notice regulations: (1) Revising
40 CFR 124.10(c) to require NPDES
permitting authorities to public notice
all NPDES permits and hearings on the
permitting authority’s publicly available
website; (2) whether proposed revisions
to public notice requirements in 40 CFR
124.10(c) should be expanded to
include NPDES non-major individual
and general permits; and (3) ways in
which NPDES permits and fact sheets
could be posted electronically to make
it easier for the Agency’s Enforcement
and Compliance History Online (ECHO)
information system to link to the permit
fact sheets. The comments received on
these three additional topics generally
expressed confusion or requested
clarification about what the EPA
intended. Based on these comments, the
EPA has decided not to make changes
to the public notice regulations to
address these issues at this time.
The EPA’s decision to allow public
notice of permitting actions for NPDES
major individual and general permits on
the permitting authority’s publicly
available website, in lieu of the
newspaper publication requirement,
increases transparency and promotes
opportunities for public involvement. It
also preserves states’ flexibility to notice
in a way that best ensures their public
will be given a meaningful opportunity
to participate in the NPDES permitting
process. While mandating public notice
of permitting activities in newspapers
was appropriate when 40 CFR
124.10(c)(2)(i) was promulgated in 1982,
the EPA recognizes that websites, along
with other tailored means for ensuring
the public consults the website, are
often more appropriate avenues for
widely disseminating information to the
public.
C. Revisions to Part 125
1. Deletion of 40 CFR 125.3(a)(1)(ii))
The EPA is finalizing, as proposed,
the deletion of 40 CFR 125.3(a)(1)(ii) to
remove an outdated regulation that is no
longer applicable. The regulation was
derived from statutory authority that
was repealed in 1981. The removal of
this provision from the regulations will
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
avoid confusion regarding its
applicability.
III. Rule Revisions Not Finalized in
This Action
The EPA is not finalizing the
proposed changes to 40 CFR 122.3(a)
due to the recent enactment of the
Vessel Incidental Discharge Act, which
exempts discharges incidental to the
normal operations of a vessel from
NPDES permitting requirements
consistent with the existing regulatory
language at 40 CFR 122.3(a).
In addition, the EPA received
numerous comments on proposed
revisions to the following eleven
regulatory sections. The Agency
requires additional time to analyze these
comments and deliberate on appropriate
next steps and thus is not taking final
action on the proposed revisions to
these at this time. The EPA has not
made any final substantive decisions
with respect to the proposed revisions
to these sections.
At this time, the EPA is deferring final
action on the proposed revisions to:
1. Definition of Proposed Permit (40
CFR 122.2)
2. Definition of Whole Effluent Toxicity
(WET) (40 CFR 122.2)
3. Application Requirements—Latitude
and Longitude (40 CFR 122.21(f)(2);
(g)(1); (h)(1); (i)(1)(iii); (j)(1)(i);
(j)(3)(i)(C); (j)(8)(ii)(A)(3); (k)(1);
(q)(1)(i); (q)(8)(ii)(A); (q)(9)(iii)(B);
(q)(10)(iii)(B); (q)(11)(iii)(B);
(q)(12)(i); (r)(3)(ii))
4. Reasonable Potential Determinations
for New Discharges (40 CFR
122.44(d))
5. Dilution Allowances (40 CFR
122.44(d))
6. Antidegradation Reference (40 CFR
122.44(d))
7. Anti-backsliding (40 CFR 122.44(l))
8. Design Flows for POTWs (40 CFR
122.45(b))
9. Objection to Administratively
Continued Permits (40 CFR 123.44)
10. CWA Section 401 Certification
Process (40 CFR 124.55(b))
11. Fact Sheet Requirements (40 CFR
124.56)
IV. Impacts
This final rule involves minor, mostly
clarifying revisions to the NPDES
regulations. It is the EPA’s view that
many of these revisions will generally
not result in new or increased impacts
or information collection by authorized
states or the regulated community. It is
also the EPA’s view that in some cases,
the revisions finalized in this action,
including deleting outdated
information, modernizing public notice
options, and clarifying requirements,
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
will reduce burden. As the EPA
modifies the NPDES application forms
to conform with the regulatory changes
in this rule, it is also modernizing the
instructions and format of the
application forms. As discussed below,
the changes to the instructions and
format of the application forms will also
reduce burdens. A summary of the
impacts assessment is provided in this
section for each topic.
Purpose and Scope of the NPDES
Program (40 CFR 122.1)
The revision to this note is being
made to inform the public of ways to
contact the NPDES program and will not
result in changes to the existing program
or program requirements. The note in
the past regulation contained an
outdated address and telephone number
for the EPA’s Office of Water. Providing
updated information will save the
permitting authorities and the public
time when they seek to contact the EPA
about these regulations.
NPDES Program Definitions: Pesticide
Discharges to Waters of the United
States From Pesticide Application,
Pesticide Residue, and New Discharger
(40 CFR 122.2)
The final revisions to the NPDES
program definitions at 40 CFR 122.2 for
‘‘pesticide discharges to waters of the
United States from pesticide
application,’’ ‘‘pesticide residue,’’ and
‘‘new discharger’’ will not result in a
change to the burden associated with
this information collection. These
revisions are being made to improve
programmatic clarity and would not
result in substantive changes to the
existing program or program
requirements.
Adding definitions for ‘‘pesticide
discharges to waters of the United States
from pesticide application’’ and
‘‘pesticide residue’’ brings the NPDES
definitions in concert with the way the
EPA’s Pesticide General Permit has been
interpreting and regulating such
applications since 2011. These
definitions would not change burden
and would not change the universe of
permittees and activities that the
Pesticide General Permit covers.
The EPA is correcting a typographical
error in paragraph (d) of the definition
‘‘New discharger’’ by correcting
‘‘NDPES’’ to ‘‘NPDES.’’
Application Requirements (40 CFR
122.21)
The final revisions to 40 CFR 122.21
related to application requirements
together with the modifications to the
instructions and format of the existing
application forms would result in a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
reduction in burden. In fact, the EPA
estimates that the changes to various
application requirements will result in a
total reduction to permittees and
permitting authorities of 17,912 hours
and $1,023,042 in costs per year. These
savings estimates consist of both
specific changes to the information
being collected on forms and general
efforts to reformat forms for increased
clarity. For more details, please refer to
section 12 of the ICR Supporting
Statement in the docket of this rule
(Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2016–
0145) and the docket associated with
this rule’s ICR (Docket ID EPA–HQ–
OW–2018–0629).
Changes to Information Previously
Collected by the EPA
The EPA is revising several data fields
to refine the content and improve the
consistency among the forms, to
improve the consistency with the
Agency’s current data standards, and
improve the clarity and usability of the
forms. For example, for every question
where it is applicable, the revised forms
direct the applicant to ‘‘stop’’ or ‘‘skip’’
to the next appropriate question
depending on the applicant’s response.
As another example, the revisions to
Form 2A create a consistent format with
the other forms by reformatting the
previous sections A, B, and C into six
major sections with detailed
instructions. Further, instructions are
provided for Form 2B for the very first
time.
Revisions to the instructions and
format of the application forms will
make them easier to use and understand
and is expected to result in a decrease
in effort for permittees applying for
coverage. The EPA also expects that the
revisions will improve the quality of
information being collected, which may
reduce the need for follow-up questions
and data requests, and the time
necessary for the permitting authority to
develop a permit. The EPA expects such
efforts to reformat forms for increased
clarity to result in a reduction of 25,426
hours and $1,534,937 in costs based on
an estimated 20,663 responses or
applications per year.
New Information To Be Collected by the
EPA
The estimated burden associated with
the new requirement for permittees to
report up to four NAICS codes on
application Form 1 (40 CFR 122.21(f)(3)
is expected to result in a burden
increase of 1,224 hours and $73,893 in
added costs based on an estimated
12,240 responses or applications per
year. The estimated burden associated
with the new requirement for permittees
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3333
to provide an email address in Forms 1,
2A, 2B, and 2S (multiple locations in 40
CFR 122.21) is expected to result in a
burden increase of 11,526 hours and
$695,839 in added costs based on an
estimated 20,663 responses or
applications per year. This increased
burden is applicable to permittees only.
Permitting authorities (authorized states
and the EPA) are expected to experience
reduced burden associated with more
efficient communication. The estimated
burden associated with this new
requirement for permitting authorities is
a reduction of 5,005 hours and savings
of $247,235 per year for state permitting
authorities based on 20,019 responses
per year.
The estimated burden associated with
the change in reporting requirements for
permittees reporting the number of SIUs
and NSCIUs (40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i)) is
expected to result in a burden decrease
of 77 hours and $3,804 for state
permitting authorities based on an
estimated 306 responses or applications
per year. It is not estimated to result in
a change of burden for permittees.
The estimated burden associated with
the revision that requires the applicant
to indicate whether the facility uses
cooling water and to specify the source
of the cooling water (40 CFR
122.21(f)(9)) is expected to result in
additional burden of 73 hours and
$4,416 for power plants and
manufacturers that use cooling water,
based on an estimated 293 responses or
applications per year. For permitting
authorities, the revision is expected to
result in more efficient permitting
because the permitting authority can
initiate data submissions and reviews
earlier in the permitting process. The
EPA estimates this will result in a
burden decrease of 227 hours and
$11,214 for state permitting authorities
based on 227 responses or application
per year.
The revision that requests an
applicant to indicate whether they are
seeking a technology variance (40 CFR
122.21(f)(10) and 122.21(j)) is estimated
to have such a small impact due to the
small number of technology variance
requests made per year that this impact
is assumed to be 0 hours and no change
in burden. Similarly, the revision that
requires new POTW dischargers to
provide data for specific analytes (40
CFR 122.21(j)(4)(i) and whole effluent
toxicity (40 CFR 122.21(j)(5)(i)) within
24 months of commencement of
discharge is estimated to incur no
additional burden or costs. Permitting
authorities typically require
characterization data requirements for
new dischargers in the initial NPDES
permit, and the only variation made
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
3334
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
pursuant to this rule is the timeframe
(24 months) for collecting and reporting
the data.
Best Management Practices (BMPs) (40
CFR 122.44(k)(4))
The revision to this note is being
made to ensure the public is aware of
the most current BMP guidance because
the note in the past regulation contained
outdated references to information
sources that are no longer available.
This revision will not result in a change
to the burden associated with this
information collection.
Public Notice Requirements (40 CFR
124.10(c))
The EPA is finalizing 40 CFR
124.10(c)(2)(iv) to allow permitting
authorities to provide public notice of
permitting actions for NPDES major
individual and general permits on the
permitting authority’s publicly available
website in lieu of the newspaper
publication requirement in 40 CFR
124.10(c)(2)(i). In addition, where the
permitting authority chooses to use
online public notice for a draft permit,
the EPA is finalizing the requirement to
post the draft permit and fact sheet on
the permitting authority’s publicly
available website for the duration of the
public comment period. However, the
EPA is not finalizing the proposed
requirement for a permitting authority
that chooses the option to use website
public notice to additionally post all
final permits, fact sheets, and response
to comments on the website for the
entire term of the permit. The purpose
of this revision is to provide the
permitting authority with an alternative
method of providing notice of permit
applications and hearings and provide
flexibility to reach communities in a
variety of methods. It is the EPA’s
understanding that the traditional
approach to newspaper publication has
become costly for permitting authorities
to implement. The EPA’s final revisions
intend to alleviate those costs by
allowing the permitting authority to use
its publicly available website as an
alternative to the traditional newspaper
publication.
At the time of the proposed
rulemaking, the EPA estimated the cost
of public notice of draft permits in
newspapers for NPDES major facilities,
sewage sludge facilities and general
permits to be approximately $1.6
million per year, nationally.20 This
20 In the preamble to the proposed rulemaking,
the EPA used $1,000 (in 2010$) as the publication
cost for a public notice in a newspaper and
assumed that there are 1,600 NPDES permit actions
that require public notice via newspaper
publication each year; thus, we arrive at the $1.6
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
estimate excluded the costs of preparing
the content of the NPDES public notice,
and the costs of the other methods to
provide notice besides newspaper
publication, such as direct mailing.
Based on information provided in the
public comments received on the
proposed rulemaking, the cost to post a
public notice online was estimated to be
$113 per notice; whereas the cost to post
a public notice in a newspaper was
estimated to be $1,416 per notice.21 The
EPA estimates that issuance of public
notice via website in lieu of newspaper
results in a burden reduction of $1,303
per NPDES action (a total reduction of
$1,419,673 per year).22 The rule allows
but does not require state and federal
permitting authorities to use electronic
public notice instead of newspaper
publication. In developing burden
estimates, the EPA assumed that states
and the EPA would continue to publish
at least some notifications in
newspapers, and therefore the burden
associated with public notice would not
be reduced in those instances.
Deletion of 40 CFR 125.3(a)(1)(ii)
The deletion of 40 CFR 125.3 (a)(1)(ii)
from the NPDES regulations will not
result in change to the burden
associated with this requirement. By
deleting this outdated provision, the
EPA clarifies that this provision no
longer applies to regulated entities.
V. Compliance Dates
With this final action, authorized
states, territories, and tribes have up to
one year to revise, as necessary, their
NPDES regulations to adopt the
requirements of this rule, or two years
if statutory changes are needed, as
provided at 40 CFR 123.62. At a
minimum, the EPA anticipates any
permitting authority using statedeveloped NPDES application forms
would need to update their regulations
and application forms, as needed, in
order to be in compliance with the
application requirements finalized in
this rulemaking.
The EPA recognizes that each
authorized program has unique state
statutes and regulations, and that many
of the revisions finalized in this rule are
million per year estimate. (81 FR 31366, May 18,
2016).
21 See the EPA’s ICR No. 0229.23, Animal Sector
public notice burden estimates, adjusted for
inflation using https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_
calculator.htm.
22 The EPA based these estimates on authorized
states providing public notice for 1,049 individual
permits online per year, and the EPA providing
public notice for 41 general permits online per year
at a savings of $1,303 per notice. This is estimated
to result in savings of $¥1,366,847 and $¥52,826
for states and the EPA, respectively.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
clarifying in nature. As a result, the EPA
anticipates that in most instances, the
program revisions that will be occurring
to conform to this rule will be
nonsubstantial, as contemplated in 40
CFR 123.62. For those instances where
the EPA determines that an authorized
program’s conforming program revision
is substantial, the process outlined in 40
CFR 123.62(b)(2) will be followed. In
addition, authorized programs may have
to update their NPDES program
documents (e.g., program description,
Attorney General statement) to reflect
these revisions, whether they are
substantial or nonsubstantial. See 40
CFR 123.62(b)(1).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is a significant regulatory
action that was submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review. Any revisions made in response
to interagency review have been
documented in the docket for this
action.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is considered an
Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. Details on the estimated cost
savings of this final rule can be found
in the rule’s economic analysis.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The information collection activities
in this rule has been submitted for
approval to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the PRA. The
Information Collection Request (ICR)
document that the EPA prepared has
been assigned EPA ICR number 2575.01.
It will be assigned an OMB control
number upon approval by OMB. You
can find a copy of the ICR submitted to
OMB in the docket for this rule, and it
is briefly summarized here. The
information collection requirements are
not enforceable—and EPA cannot
collect any information set out in the
ICR—until OMB approves them. In
additional, the EPA will post a copy of
the final ICR to the docket for this rule
upon approval by OMB.
CWA section 402 and the NPDES
regulations require collection of
information primarily used by
permitting authorities, permittees, and
the EPA to make NPDES permitting
decisions. The burden and costs
associated with the entire NPDES
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
program are accounted in an approved
ICR (EPA ICR number 0229.23, OMB
control no. 2040–0004). This final rule
and the corresponding updated
application forms require revisions to
the ICR to reflect changes to the forms
and other information collection
requirements. EPA is reflecting the
paperwork burden and costs associated
with this rule in a separate ICR instead
of revising the existing ICR for the entire
program for administrative reasons.
Eventually, EPA plans to consolidate
the burden and costs in this ICR into
that master ICR for the entire NPDES
program and discontinue this separate
collection. EPA expects the changes set
out in this final rule along with changes
to the instructions and format of the
NPDES permit applications to result in
an overall burden decrease to permitting
authorities and the regulated
community of approximately $2,389,889
and 17,912 hours annually.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for the EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. When
OMB approves this ICR, the Agency will
announce that approval in the Federal
Register and publish a technical
amendment to 40 CFR part 9 to display
the OMB control number for the
approved information collection
activities contained in this final rule.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. In making this
determination, the impact of concern is
any significant adverse economic
impact on small entities. An agency may
certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, has
no net burden, or otherwise has a
positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This rule
eliminates inconsistencies between
regulations and application forms,
streamlines and updates application
forms, provides clarification to existing
regulations, deletes outdated regulatory
provisions, updates Agency contact
information, and provides for new
programmatic flexibility in providing
public notice on NPDES permitting
actions. We have therefore concluded
that this action would have no net
regulatory burden for directly regulated
small entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, and does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
final rule eliminates inconsistencies
between regulations and application
forms, streamlines and updates
application forms, provides clarification
to existing regulations, deletes outdated
regulatory provisions, updates Agency
contact information, and provides for
new programmatic flexibility in
providing public notice on NPDES
permitting actions. This final rule does
not impose significant burden on the
EPA, states, or the regulated
community, or specifically, any
significant burden on any small entity.
With respect to any impacts on any
authorized state programs, the costs
involved in this action are imposed only
by participation in a voluntary federal
program. UMRA generally excludes
from the definition of ‘‘federal
intergovernmental mandate’’ duties that
arise from participation in a voluntary
federal program. Thus, this final rule is
not subject to the requirements of
section 202 and 205 of the UMRA. For
the same reason, the EPA has
determined that this rule contains no
regulatory requirements that will
significantly affect small governments.
Thus, this final rule is not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA.
This action does not have federalism
implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
3335
actions, it will not have substantial
direct effects on: Tribal governments;
the relationship between the federal
government and Indian tribes; or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action and the EPA determined
that tribal consultation was not
necessary for this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because these changes to procedural
requirements and forms do not address
environmental health risk or safety
risks.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ because it is does not
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution or use of energy.
This final rule eliminates
inconsistencies between regulations and
application forms, provides
clarifications to existing regulations,
deletes outdated provisions, and
provides for new programmatic
flexibility in providing public notice on
NPDES permitting actions.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
This final rulemaking does not
involve technical standards.
This final rule does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. The EPA considered the
impacts on tribes, and concluded that
there would be no substantial direct
compliance costs or impact on tribes.
Because the purpose of the final rule is
to eliminate inconsistencies between
regulations and application forms,
streamline and update application
forms, provide clarification to existing
regulations, delete outdated regulatory
provisions, update Agency contact
information, and provide for new
programmatic flexibility in providing
public notice on NPDES permitting
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low
Income Populations
The EPA has determined that the
human health or environmental risk
addressed by this action will not have
potential disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority, low-income or
indigenous populations. This final rule
eliminates inconsistencies between
regulations and application forms,
provides clarifications to existing
regulations, deletes outdated provisions,
and provides for new programmatic
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
3336
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
flexibility in providing public notice on
NPDES permitting actions.
In addition, the EPA’s final revision
related to the option for online public
notice, in lieu of newspaper publication,
of NPDES actions considered potential
effects on environmental justice
communities. The final rule includes a
regulatory note reminding the
permitting authority to ensure that the
method(s) of public notice used
effectively informs all interested
communities and allows access to the
permitting process for those seeking to
participate. This includes potentially
utilizing newspaper notices in areas that
continue to be best served by printed
publications, such as in areas known or
likely to have limited broadband
internet access, areas with underserved
or economically disadvantaged
communities, areas with prolonged
electrical system outrages, and during
large-scale disasters (e.g., hurricanes).
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA and
the EPA will submit a report containing
this rule and other required information
to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the U.S. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 122
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water
pollution control.
40 CFR Part 124
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous waste,
Indians—lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
40 CFR Part 125
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Waste
treatment and disposal, Water pollution
control.
Dated: December 21, 2018.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Acting Administrator, Environmental
Protection Agency.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, EPA amends Chapter I of
Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
PART 122—EPA ADMINISTERED
PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM
1. The authority citation for part 122
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.
Subpart A—Definitions and General
Program Requirements
2. Section 122.1 is amended by
revising ‘‘Note to § 122.1’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 122.1
Purpose and scope.
*
*
*
*
*
[Note to § 122.1: Information
concerning the NPDES program and its
regulations can be obtained by
contacting the Water Permits Division
(4203), Office of Wastewater
Management, U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20460 and by visiting the homepage
at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/.]
■ 3. Section 122.2 is amended by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (d) of the
definition of ‘‘new discharger’’; and
■ b. Adding in alphabetical order
definitions for ‘‘pesticide discharges to
waters of the United States from
pesticide application’’ and ‘‘pesticide
residue’’.
The revision and additions read as
follows:
§ 122.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
New discharger * * *
(d) Which has never received a finally
effective NPDES permit for discharges at
that ‘‘site.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Pesticide discharges to waters of the
United States from pesticide application
means the discharges that result from
the application of biological pesticides,
and the application of chemical
pesticides that leave a residue, from
point sources to waters of the United
States. In the context of this definition
of pesticide discharges to waters of the
United States from pesticide
application, this does not include
agricultural storm water discharges and
return flows from irrigated agriculture,
which are excluded by law (33 U.S.C.
1342(l); 33 U.S.C. 1362(14)).
Pesticide residue for the purpose of
determining whether an NPDES permit
is needed for discharges to waters of the
United States from pesticide
application, means that portion of a
pesticide application that is discharged
from a point source to waters of the
United States and no longer provides
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
pesticidal benefits. It also includes any
degradates of the pesticide.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—Permit Application and
Special NPDES Program Requirements
4. Section 122.21 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i)
introductory text and (a)(2)(i)(A),
(c)(2)(ii)(B), (f) introductory text, and
(f)(3) and (4);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (f)(9) and (10);
■ c. Revising paragraph (g) introductory
text;
■ d. Adding paragraph (g)(7)(ix);
■ e. Revising paragraphs (j)(1)(ii) and
(j)(1)(viii)(D)(2) and (3);
■ f. Adding paragraph (j)(1)(ix); and
■ g. Revising paragraphs (j)(4)(i),
(j)(5)(i), (j)(6)(i), (j)(9), (k) introductory
text, (k)(5)(vi), (q)(2)(i), (q)(8)(vi)
introductory text, (q)(8)(vi)(A),
(q)(9)(iii)(D) and (E), (q)(9)(iv)(A),
(q)(10)(ii)(A), (q)(10)(iii)(K)(1),
(q)(11)(ii)(A), (q)(12)(i), and (q)(13).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 122.21 Application for a permit
(applicable to State programs, see § 123.25).
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) All applicants for EPA-issued
permits must submit applications on
EPA permit application forms. More
than one application form may be
required from a facility depending on
the number and types of discharges or
outfalls found there. Application forms
may be obtained by contacting: U.S.
EPA, Mail Code 4203M, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460 or by visiting https://
www.epa.gov/npdes. Applications for
EPA-issued permits must be submitted
as follows:
(A) All applicants, other than POTWs,
TWTDS, vessels, and pesticide
applicators must submit Form 1.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) The applicant’s name, address,
telephone number, electronic mail
address and ownership status;
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Information requirements. All
applicants for NPDES permits, other
than POTWs and other TWTDS, vessels,
and pesticide applicators, must provide
the information in paragraphs (f)(1)
through (10) of this section to the
Director, using the application form
provided by the Director. Additional
information required of applicants is set
forth in paragraphs (g) through (k) and
(q) through (r) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Up to four SIC and up to four
NAICS codes that best reflect the
principal products or services provided
by the facility.
(4) The operator’s name, address,
telephone number, electronic mail
address, ownership status, and status as
Federal, State, private, public, or other
entity.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) An indication of whether the
facility uses cooling water and the
source of the cooling water.
(10) An indication of whether the
facility is requesting any of the
variances at 40 CFR 122.21(m), if known
at the time of application.
(g) Application requirements for
existing manufacturing, commercial,
mining, and silvicultural dischargers.
Existing manufacturing, commercial,
mining, and silvicultural dischargers
applying for NPDES permits, except for
those facilities subject to the
requirements of § 122.21(h), shall
provide the following information to the
Director, using application forms
provided by the Director.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(ix) Where quantitative data are
required in paragraphs (g)(7)(i) through
(viii) of this section, existing data may
be used, if available, in lieu of sampling
done solely for the purpose of the
application, provided that: All data
requirements are met; sampling was
performed, collected, and analyzed no
more than four and one-half years prior
to submission; all data are
representative of the discharge; and all
available representative data are
considered in the values reported.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Applicant information. Name,
mailing address, telephone number, and
electronic mail address of the applicant,
and indication as to whether the
applicant is the facility’s owner,
operator, or both;
*
*
*
*
*
(viii) * * *
(D) * * *
(2) The name, mailing address,
contact person, phone number, and
electronic mail address of the
organization transporting the discharge,
if the transport is provided by a party
other than the applicant;
(3) The name, mailing address,
contact person, phone number,
electronic mail address and NPDES
permit number (if any) of the receiving
facility; and
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
(ix) An indication of whether
applicant is operating under or
requesting to operate under a variance
as specified at 40 CFR 122.21(n), if
known at the time of application.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) As provided in paragraphs (j)(4)(ii)
through (x) of this section, all applicants
must submit to the Director effluent
monitoring information for samples
taken from each outfall through which
effluent is discharged to waters of the
United States, except for CSOs. The
Director may allow applicants to submit
sampling data for only one outfall on a
case-by-case basis, where the applicant
has two or more outfalls with
substantially identical effluent. The
Director may also allow applicants to
composite samples from one or more
outfalls that discharge into the same
mixing zone. For POTWs applying prior
to commencement of discharge, data
shall be submitted no later than 24
months after the commencement of
discharge;
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) All applicants must provide an
identification of any whole effluent
toxicity tests conducted during the four
and one-half years prior to the date of
the application on any of the applicant’s
discharges or on any receiving water
near the discharge. For POTWs applying
prior to commencement of discharge,
data shall be submitted no later than 24
months after the commencement of
discharge.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(i) Number of significant industrial
users (SIUs) and non-significant
categorical industrial users (NSCIUs), as
defined at 40 CFR 403.3(v), including
SIUs and NSCIUs that truck or haul
waste, discharging to the POTW; and
*
*
*
*
*
(9) Contractors. All applicants must
provide the name, mailing address,
telephone number, electronic mail
address and responsibilities of all
contractors responsible for any
operational or maintenance aspects of
the facility; and
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Application requirements for new
sources and new discharges. New
manufacturing, commercial, mining and
silvicultural dischargers applying for
NPDES permits (except for new
discharges of facilities subject to the
requirements of paragraph (h) of this
section or new discharges of storm
water associated with industrial activity
which are subject to the requirements of
§ 122.26(c)(1) and this section (except as
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3337
provided by § 122.26(c)(1)(ii)) shall
provide the following information to the
Director, using the application forms
provided by the Director:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(vi) No later than 24 months after the
commencement of discharge from the
proposed facility, the applicant is
required to complete and submit items
V and VI of NPDES application Form 2C
(see § 122.21(g)). However, the applicant
need not complete those portions of
Item V requiring tests which have
already been performed and reported
under the discharge monitoring
requirements of the NPDES permit.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The name, mailing address,
telephone number, and electronic mail
address of the applicant; and
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * *
(vi) If sewage sludge from the
applicant’s facility is provided to
another ‘‘person who prepares,’’ as
defined at 40 CFR 503.9(r), and the
sewage sludge is not subject to
paragraph (q)(8)(iv) of this section, the
applicant must provide the following
information for each facility receiving
the sewage sludge:
(A) The name, mailing address, and
electronic mail address of the receiving
facility;
*
*
*
*
*
(9) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) The name, mailing address,
telephone number, and electronic mail
address of the site owner, if different
from the applicant;
(E) The name, mailing address,
telephone number, and electronic mail
address of the person who applies
sewage sludge to the site, if different
from the applicant;
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) * * *
(A) Whether the applicant has
contacted the permitting authority in
the State where the bulk sewage sludge
subject to § 503.13(b)(2) will be applied,
to ascertain whether bulk sewage sludge
subject to § 503.13(b)(2) has been
applied to the site on or since July 20,
1993, and if so, the name of the
permitting authority and the name,
phone number, and electronic mail
address if available, of a contact person
at the permitting authority;
*
*
*
*
*
(10) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The site name or number, contact
person, mailing address, telephone
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
3338
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 12, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
number, and electronic mail address for
the surface disposal site; and
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(K) * * *
(1) The name, contact person, mailing
address, and electronic mail address of
the facility; and
*
*
*
*
*
(11) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The name and/or number, contact
person, mailing address, telephone
number, and electronic mail address of
the sewage sludge incinerator; and
*
*
*
*
*
(12) * * *
(i) The name, contact person, mailing
address, electronic mail address,
location, and all applicable permit
numbers of the MSWLF;
*
*
*
*
*
(13) Contractors. All applicants must
provide the name, mailing address,
telephone number, electronic mail
address and responsibilities of all
contractors responsible for any
operational or maintenance aspects of
the facility related to sewage sludge
generation, treatment, use, or disposal;
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 122.44 is amended by
revising the ‘‘Note to paragraph (k)(4)’’
read as follows:
■
§ 122.44 Establishing limitations,
standards, and other permit conditions
(applicable to State NPDES programs, see
§ 123.25).
*
*
(k) * * *
(4) * * *
*
*
Note to Paragraph (k)(4): Additional
technical information on BMPs and the
elements of BMPs is contained in the
following documents: Guidance Manual for
Developing Best Management Practices
(BMPs), October 1993, EPA No. 833/B–93–
004, NTIS No. PB 94–178324, ERIC No.
W498); Storm Water Management for
Construction Activities: Developing Pollution
Prevention Plans and Best Management
Practices, September 1992, EPA No. 832/R–
92–005, NTIS No. PB 92–235951, ERIC No.
N482); Storm Water Management for
Construction Activities, Developing Pollution
Prevention Plans and Best Management
Practices: Summary Guidance, EPA No. 833/
R–92–001, NTIS No. PB 93–223550; ERIC No.
W139; Storm Water Management for
Industrial Activities, Developing Pollution
Prevention Plans and Best Management
Practices, September 1992; EPA 832/R–92–
006, NTIS No. PB 92–235969, ERIC No.
N477; Storm Water Management for
Industrial Activities, Developing Pollution
Prevention Plans and Best Management
Practices: Summary Guidance, EPA 833/R–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Feb 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
*
*
*
*
*
PART 124—PROCEDURES FOR
DECISIONMAKING
PART 125—CRITERIA AND
STANDARDS FOR THE NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM
8. The authority citation for part 125
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.,
1251 et seq., unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A—Criteria and Standards for
Imposing Technology-Based
Treatment Requirements Under
Sections 301(b) and 402 of the Act
§ 125.3
[Amended]
9. Section 125.3 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph
(a)(1)(ii).
■
6. The authority citation for part 124
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. et seq.; Safe Drinking
Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.; Clean
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; Clean Air
Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A—General Program
Requirements
[FR Doc. 2019–01339 Filed 2–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
7. Section 124.10 is amended by
revising (c) introductory text and adding
paragraph (c)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
■
§ 124.10 Public notice of permit actions
and public comment period.
Subpart C—Permit Conditions
*
92–002, NTIS No. PB 94–133782; ERIC No.
W492. These and other EPA guidance
documents can be obtained through the
National Service Center for Environmental
Publications (NSCEP) at https://www.epa.gov/
nscep. In addition, States may have BMP
guidance documents. These EPA guidance
documents are listed here only for
informational purposes; they are not binding
and EPA does not intend that these guidance
documents have any mandatory, regulatory
effect by virtue of their listing in this note.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Methods (applicable to State
programs, see 40 CFR 123.25 (NPDES),
145.11 (UIC), 233.26 (404), and 271.14
(RCRA)). Public notice of activities
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section shall be given by the following
methods:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(iv) For NPDES major permits and
NPDES general permits, in lieu of the
requirement for publication of a notice
in a daily or weekly newspaper, as
described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this
section, the Director may publish all
notices of activities described in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section to the
permitting authority’s public website. If
the Director selects this option for a
draft permit, as defined in § 122.2, in
addition to meeting the requirements in
paragraph (d) of this section, the
Director must post the draft permit and
fact sheet on the website for the
duration of the public comment period.
Note to paragraph (c)(2)(iv): The Director
is encouraged to ensure that the method(s) of
public notice effectively informs all
interested communities and allows access to
the permitting process for those seeking to
participate.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00054
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket ID FEMA–2018–0002; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–8567]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule identifies
communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) that are scheduled for
suspension on the effective dates listed
within this rule because of
noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the
program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives
documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain
management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this
rule, the suspension will not occur and
notification of this will be provided by
publication in the Federal Register on a
subsequent date. Also, information
identifying the current participation
status of a community can be obtained
from FEMA’s Community Status Book
(CSB). The CSB is available at https://
www.fema.gov/national-floodinsurance-program-community-statusbook.
DATES: The effective date of each
community’s scheduled suspension is
the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the
third column of the following tables.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3324-3338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01339]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 122, 124 and 125
[EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0145; FRL9988-87-OW]
RIN 2040-AF25
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES):
Applications and Program Updates
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
certain revisions to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System permitting regulations proposed on May 18, 2016. The final
regulatory changes are minor and will improve and clarify the
regulations in the following major categories: Regulatory definitions
(``new discharger'' and two definitions related to the discharge of
pesticides from pesticides application); permit applications; and
public notice. This final rule also updates the EPA contact information
and web addresses for electronic databases, updates outdated references
to best management practices guidance documents, and deletes a
provision relating to best practicable waste treatment technology for
publicly owned treatment works that is no longer applicable. The final
revisions modernize the NPDES regulations, promote submission of
complete permit applications, and clarify regulatory requirements to
allow more timely development of NPDES permits that protect human
health and the environment.
DATES: This final rule is effective on June 12, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0145. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Sylvester, Water Permits
Division, Office of Wastewater Management, Mail Code 4203M,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564-1279; email address:
sylvester.francis@epa.gov; or Janita Aguirre, Water Permits Division,
Office of Wastewater Management, Mail Code 4203M, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202) 566-1149; email address:
aguirre.janita@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
The information presented in this preamble is organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the Agency taking and why?
C. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
D. What are the incremental costs and benefits of this action?
E. How was the final rule developed?
II. Rule Revisions Finalized in This Action
A. Revisions to Part 122
B. Revisions to Part 124
[[Page 3325]]
C. Revisions to Part 125
III. Rule Revisions Not Finalized in This Action
IV. Impacts
V. Compliance Dates
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this action are: The EPA;
authorized state, territorial, and tribal programs; and the regulated
community. This table is not intended to be exhaustive, rather, it
provides a guide for readers regarding entities that this action is
likely to regulate.
Table I-1--Entities Potentially Affected by This Final Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of potentially
Category affected entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Territorial, and Indian Tribal States and Territories
Governments. authorized to administer the
NPDES permitting program;
States, Territories, and
Indian Tribes that provide
certification under section
401 of the CWA; States,
Territories, and Indian Tribes
that own or operate treatment
works.
Municipalities......................... Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs), municipal separate
storm sewer systems (MS4s), or
other municipal entities
required to apply for or seek
coverage under an NPDES
individual or general permit
and to perform routine
monitoring as a condition of
an NPDES permit.
Industry............................... Facilities required to apply
for or seek coverage under an
NPDES individual or general
permit and to perform routine
monitoring as a condition of
an NPDES permit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What action is the Agency taking and why?
The EPA is finalizing certain minor, generally clarifying revisions
to the NPDES regulations initially proposed on May 18, 2016.\1\ The
final regulatory changes improve and clarify regulations in the
following major categories: Regulatory definitions (``new discharger''
and two definitions related to the discharge of pesticides from
pesticides application); permit applications; and public notice. The
final regulatory changes also update the EPA's contact information and
web addresses for electronic databases and outdated references to best
management practices, and delete a provision that is no longer
applicable (40 CFR 125.3(a)(1)(ii), relating to best practicable waste
treatment technology for publicly owned treatment works). As a result
of this final rule, the NPDES regulations will promote submission of
complete permit applications, contain modernized regulatory
requirements to allow more timely development of NPDES permits that
protect human health and the environment, and be more clear and
effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 81 FR 31343.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
These regulations are promulgated pursuant to the Clean Water Act,
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., in particular, CWA sections 301, 304(i), 308,
402 and 501.
D. What are the incremental costs and benefits of this action?
This final rule promulgates minor, generally clarifying revisions
to the NPDES regulations. The EPA has estimated that the revisions
finalized in this action will result in an overall burden decrease to
permitting authorities and the regulated community of approximately
$2,389,889 and 17,912 hours annually.
E. How was the final rule developed?
In developing this final rule, the EPA considered the public
comments and feedback received from stakeholders on the May 18, 2016
proposal (hereafter referred to as the Proposed Rule). The EPA provided
a 75-day public comment period after the Proposed Rule was published in
the Federal Register.
Over 450 organizations and individuals submitted comments on a
range of issues. The EPA received an additional 14,438 letters from
individuals associated with mass letter writing campaigns. Some
comments addressed issues beyond the scope of the proposed rulemaking;
however, the EPA did not contemplate expanding the scope of the
rulemaking or making regulatory changes to address the substance of
these comments. In each section of this preamble, the EPA discusses
significant public comments so that the public is fully aware of the
Agency's basis for the final rule. For a full response to these and all
other comments, see the EPA's Response to Comments document in the
official public docket for this rulemaking.
In addition, the EPA met with all stakeholders who requested time
to discuss the contents of the proposed rule. Records of each meeting
are included in the official public docket.
II. Rule Revisions Finalized in This Action
The EPA has created a comparison document showing the revisions to
the current NPDES regulations made by this final rule, and a second
document showing the revisions made between the proposed and final
rule. The EPA has posted both documents at: https://www.epa.gov/npdes/npdes-application-and-program-updates, and placed them in the docket
for today's rule.
A. Revisions to Part 122
1. Purpose and Scope (Note to 40 CFR 122.1)--NPDES Contact Information
The EPA is finalizing the correction to the Note to 40 CFR 122.1,
NPDES contact information, to delete outdated references to program
contact information that are no longer accurate. The final Note also
includes the updated website address for the NPDES homepage, https://www.epa.gov/npdes/.
The EPA received one public comment associated with this revision.
The comment expressed support for the effort to remove the outdated
information and questioned whether the EPA could remove the Note
entirely or
[[Page 3326]]
provide a more generic approach than including specific contact
information that requires a rulemaking to update. While it is true that
the Note to 40 CFR 122.1 could be deleted entirely or generically
updated, the EPA's view is that providing up-to-date contact
information in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) will save the
permitting authorities and the public time when they seek to contact
the EPA about these regulations. For instance, if the Note were deleted
entirely, an interested party who is used to the information appearing
in the regulatory text may spend unnecessary time searching the
internet and navigating the EPA's website for NPDES information.
Instead, the EPA is retaining the Note and including the up-to-date
NPDES homepage to provide a direct link for interested parties to find
the EPA's NPDES-related information about a particular issue or program
area.
2. NPDES Program Definitions (40 CFR 122.2)
(a) Pesticide Discharges to Waters of the United States From Pesticide
Application
In 2009, the Court of Appeals in National Cotton Council, et al. v.
EPA, 553 F.3d 927 (6th Cir. 2009) found that point source discharges of
biological pesticides and chemical pesticides that leave a residue to
waters of the United States (U.S.) are pollutants under the CWA and
therefore require NPDES permits. In response, the EPA issued the first
Pesticide General Permit on October 31, 2011 and reissued the permit on
October 24, 2016.\2\ The Proposed Rule added a definition of
``pesticide applications to waters of the United States'' to ensure the
NPDES regulations are consistent with the 6th Circuit decision as
implemented by the Agency's Pesticide General Permit. In this action,
the EPA includes a final definition for ``Pesticide discharges to
waters of the United States from pesticide application,'' as well as a
regulatory definition for ``pesticide residue.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See https://www.epa.gov/npdes/pesticide-permitting. The
EPA's Pesticide General Permit applies only to areas and activities
where states are not authorized to administer the NPDES program.
Authorized states develop and issue their own permits for pesticide
discharges to waters of the United States from pesticide
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The comments received on the proposal were mixed. Many comments
requested additional language clarifications in order to be consistent
with the court decision and to avoid confusion regarding the issue of
whether or not pesticides must leave a residue to qualify as pollutants
requiring permit coverage under the NPDES program. One comment
requested that the EPA include definitions for ``biological
pesticides,'' ``chemical pesticides,'' and ``pesticide residue.''
In response to the comments received, this final rule includes
minor wording changes from the proposal to use NPDES regulatory
terminology such as ``discharge'' and to change ``pesticide
application'' to ``discharges to waters of the United States from
pesticide application'' to better reflect current NPDES terminology,
which is used in both the 6th Circuit decision and the EPA's Pesticide
General Permit. Based on the comments received, this final rule also
includes a regulatory definition of the term ``pesticide residue'' for
purposes of clarifying which discharges to waters of the U.S. from the
application of pesticides require NPDES permits. The EPA is not adding
a regulatory definition for ``biological pesticide'' \3\ in 40 CFR
122.2 because this concept and relevant regulatory definitions are
already included in 40 CFR 174.3, 40 CFR 158.2000(a)(1), and 40 CFR
158.2100(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This term, also called biopesticides, includes microbial
pesticides, biochemical pesticides, and plant-incorporated
protectants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This definition in the final rule provides that the term
``pesticide residue'' in 40 CFR 122.2 includes the portion of a
pesticides application that is discharged from a point source to waters
of the U.S. and no longer provides pesticidal benefits. It also
includes any degradates of the pesticide. This definition is identical
to the definition of ``pesticide residue'' already used in the EPA's
Pesticide General Permit.
By including the final definitions related to pesticide discharges
to waters of the U.S. in the comprehensive NPDES definitions at 40 CFR
122.2, the regulations have increased clarity and consistency regarding
discharges regulated under the CWA and therefore require NPDES permits.
The final definitions do not change which pesticide discharges are
subject to NPDES permitting.
(b) New Discharger
The EPA is finalizing the proposed correction of a typographical
error in paragraph (d) of the New Discharger definition to change
``NDPES'' to ``NPDES.'' The EPA received no public comments associated
with this revision.
3. Changes to Existing NPDES Permit Application Requirements (40 CFR
122.21)
The CWA directs the Administrator to ``promulgate guidelines for
the purpose of establishing uniform application forms,'' and minimum
requirements for the acquisition of information from owners and
operators of point-sources of discharge. 33 U.S.C. 1314(i). The EPA
regulations at 40 CFR part 122 implement this requirement. The EPA
proposed specific revisions to clarify and update the permit
application requirements in 40 CFR 122.21. In this action, the EPA is
finalizing the revisions to the permit application requirements, as
described in the following sections, to update and improve application
consistency, accuracy, and usability.
The EPA regulations establish permit application requirements and
corresponding forms for use by all applicants for EPA-issued individual
permits. Accordingly, the EPA has updated the eight application forms
consistent with the final requirements addressed in this final rule.\4\
An authorized state program may choose to use the EPA's forms or
develop its own application forms; however, an authorized program's
forms must collect all of the information that the Agency's regulations
require.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For more information about the NPDES application forms and
their history, see the preamble to the proposed rule: 81 FR 31345-
31346 (May 18, 2016) and 81 FR 31349 (May 18, 2016).
\5\ 40 CFR 122.21(a)(2)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Proposed Rule, the EPA indicated that it had established a
separate docket (EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0146) to receive comments on potential
future changes to the application forms and information requests.
Specifically, the EPA solicited comment on whether and how a separate
future action should address the utility and clarity of the information
requests and on how to minimize the information collection burden on
respondents, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of information technology (see 81 FR 31367,
May 18, 2016). The EPA did not receive any substantive comments that
identified duplication, redundancy or other ways to reduce burden
associated with the forms that have not been otherwise discussed and/or
addressed in this rulemaking.
(a) NPDES Contact Information (40 CFR 122.21(a)(2))
The EPA is finalizing the correction to 40 CFR 122.21(a)(2) to
update contact information for obtaining application
[[Page 3327]]
forms, as proposed. The final provision deletes outdated references to
program contact information, and includes the updated website address
for the NPDES homepage, https://www.epa.gov/npdes. The EPA received no
public comments associated with this revision. In general, it is the
EPA's view that providing up-to-date contact information in the CFR
will save the permitting authorities and the public time when they seek
to contact the EPA about these regulations. For instance, if this
information were not provided in the regulation, an interested party
may spend unnecessary time searching the internet and navigating the
EPA's website for NPDES information. Instead, the EPA is providing
updated contact information for parties interested in obtaining the
NPDES application forms.
(b) Industrial Classification Codes (40 CFR 122.21(f)(3))
The EPA is finalizing the revisions to the requirements at 40 CFR
122.21(f)(3), for all facilities except POTWs and treatment works
treating domestic sewage (TWTDSs), to include North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes,\6\ in addition to Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes,\7\ that reflect the products or
services provided by the facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ NAICS code numbers and descriptions in the North American
Industrial Classification System Manual prepared by the Executive
Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget can be
found online at: https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/.
\7\ SIC code numbers and descriptions in the 1987 Standard
Industrial Classification Manual prepared by the Executive Office of
the President, Office of Management and Budget can be found online
at: https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/sic_manual.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most comments received either supported or did not oppose the
proposed requirement to include NAICS codes. While generally supporting
the revision, several comments questioned why the EPA proposed to
require submission of both SIC and NAICS codes, suggesting instead that
the Agency should require one or the other, or provide flexibility to
choose which code to submit. Some comments also expressed concern and
requested clarification about the overall timing and transition process
from SIC codes to NAICS codes.
The EPA's intent with the proposed rulemaking was to require both
SIC and NAICS codes, as both codes provide useful information. For
example, SIC codes are referenced in several Effluent Limitations
Guidelines regulations that serve as the basis for effluent limitations
in NPDES permits. While the EPA may elect to replace those SIC codes
with NAICS codes at some point in the future, the SIC code is currently
a critical piece of information needed for NPDES permitting
purposes.\8\ While the older SIC codes are still referenced in other
regulations, NAICS codes are now the federal data standard typically
used to identify and classify industrial operations.\9\ Although the
NAICS codes are not directly linked to most CWA implementing
regulations, they are the recommended industry classification system in
OMB's Statistical Policy Directive No. 8, and NAICS codes have
effectively replaced SIC codes, which have not been updated since 1987.
Use of the NAICS codes as the data standard across all federal data
systems ensures consistency in assessments conducted across multiple
federal databases. Use of the NAICS codes also allows the NPDES permit
program to reflect the evolution of industries to which dischargers
belong.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For example, see 40 CFR 414.11(a) which establishes effluent
limitations guidelines subcategories using the 1987 SIC categories.
\9\ See ``North American Industry Classification System United
States, 2017'' Executive Office of the President, Office of
Management and Budget, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In many cases there is a one-to-one crosswalk between the SIC and
NAICS codes; however, this is not always true. [Note: The United States
Census Bureau provides online resources connecting SIC and NAICS codes:
https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/concordances/concordances.html.]
Given that some CWA regulations use SIC codes, both codes remain
important for permitting and data tracking purposes. Therefore, the
final rule will require an applicant to provide both SIC and NAICS
codes on application forms. After changes are made in the future to
replace SIC code references in other CWA regulations, the EPA will
evaluate revisiting the application forms to remove or revise the SIC
code requirements.
(c) New Discharger Data Submission (40 CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi), 40 CFR
122.21(j)(4)(i), and 40 CFR 122.21(j)(5)(i))
Because they have not commenced discharge, applications for new
dischargers require submission of estimates of the types and quantities
of pollutants discharged. The regulations for non-POTWs require
submission of actual effluent data (consistent with the effluent
characterization data required in the applications for existing
dischargers) no later than 24 months after the discharge has commenced.
In the EPA's Proposed Rule, the Agency sought to revise application
requirements for new dischargers, both POTWs and non-POTWs, to require
the submission of effluent data that is required in the application for
an existing discharger within 18 months from the commencement of
discharge. For non-POTWs, the proposal shortened the period from 24
months to 18 months, and for POTWs, the proposal created the
requirement for the first time. The revision sought to ensure that
dischargers submit the required effluent data in a manner that is
timely and consistent. Providing follow-up effluent data allows the
permit writer to evaluate any discrepancies between estimated or
anticipated effluent characteristics estimated and reported by the
applicant prior to the commencement of discharge, and the effluent
characteristics based on actual effluent data after the commencement of
discharge.
In the proposed rulemaking, the EPA envisioned three months for a
facility's treatment system to be operating efficiently, one year of
sampling, and another three months to report data. The EPA received
mixed comments on the proposed revisions to 40 CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi), 40
CFR 122.21(j)(4)(i), and 40 CFR 122.21(j)(5)(i). Multiple comments
generally supported the proposed revisions and one comment suggested
that the timeframe should be shortened from the proposed 18 months to
16 months by reducing the time to report data from three months to one
month. On the other hand, several comments objected to shortening the
timeframe from 24 months to 18 months for new industrial (non-POTW)
dischargers. They argued that 24 months is necessary for optimizing
facility operation and gathering and reporting representative data. One
commenter pointed to examples in other rulemakings, such as the EPA's
steam electric power sector effluent limitation standards and
guidelines,\10\ where the need for significant facility startup and
optimization time is documented. Additionally, one comment suggested
that many treatment systems are affected by rainfall or are dependent
on biological treatment that takes longer than three months to
establish and optimize. Another commenter suggested that 24 months is a
more suitable timeframe for new POTWs as well, suggesting that it
provides a more complete data set, representing close to two full
annual cycles that account for potential seasonal fluctuations and
their impacts on effluent quality and flow variability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam
Electric Power Generating Point Source Category, 80 FR 67837
(November 3, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3328]]
When the EPA first established \11\ the non-POTW requirement at 40
CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi) and the corresponding requirements in application
Form 2D (for new sources and new dischargers), the Agency considered a
range of options for the submission of ``follow-up data.'' The range of
options the EPA considered included requiring no additional information
at all to requiring the submission of Form 2C (applicable to existing
dischargers) after commencement of the discharge. When the EPA first
established the requirement to provide follow-up data no later than two
years after commencement of discharge, the Agency received no negative
comments and the provision was generally supported. At that time, some
commenters suggested that a ``steady state'' or optimized operations
for non-POTWs may not be reached within one year's time and 24 months
was therefore more appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The EPA first proposed 40 CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi) on October
1, 1984 (49 FR 38812) and first finalized the 24-month requirement
on July 28, 1986 (51 FR 26982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the Agency did in 1984 and 1986, the EPA continues to take into
consideration the needs of industry for regulatory certainty and the
possible necessity for adjusting permit limits after operation
commences to protect human health and the environment. As a result,
after evaluating the comments received, the EPA is retaining the 24-
month requirement for non-POTWs to submit effluent data after the
commencement of discharge and is not finalizing the proposed revision
to 40 CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi) to reduce the requirement to 18 months. As
suggested by commenters, the additional six months could strengthen the
quality of information submitted to the Agency.
The EPA is finalizing, in this action, the editorial changes to 40
CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi) to remove the reference to a permit holder's
presumed gender, as well as correcting the reference to the correct
application form--Form 2C. In addition, after evaluating the comments
received, and for the reasons discussed above in the context of new
non-POTW dischargers, the EPA is finalizing revisions to 40 CFR
122.21(j)(4)(i) and 40 CFR 122.21(j)(5)(i) with modifications to
require submission of follow-up data for new POTWs no later than 24
months after commencement of the discharge. Further details regarding
the Agency's basis for these actions may be found in the Response to
Comment document.
(d) Data Age for Permit Renewal (40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix))
The EPA proposed a new paragraph (ix) to 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7), to
mirror the existing language of 40 CFR 122.21(j)(4)(vi) and (vii),
which is applicable to POTWs, and corresponding Form 2A. Proposed
paragraph 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) would have been applicable to
industrial applicants and incorporated into Form 2C. The existing
regulation for POTWs at 40 CFR 122.21(j)(4)(vi) provides that existing
data may be used, if available, in lieu of sampling done solely for the
purpose of the application. Additionally, 40 CFR 122.21(j)(4)(vii)
provides that for POTWs, existing data for specified pollutants
collected within four and one-half years of the application must be
included in the pollutant data summary by the applicant. It also
provides that if sampling for a specific pollutant is done monthly or
more frequently, it is only necessary to summarize all data collected
within one year of the application. For the purpose of consistency, the
EPA sought to adopt the same conditions on the use of existing data in
lieu of sampling data collected solely for the purposes of the
application for industrial applicants through the proposed 40 CFR
122.21(g)(7)(ix). The proposed requirement would have superseded the
instructions to current Form 2C, applicable to industrial applicants,
which provide flexibility to use existing data, but subject to
different conditions. The Form 2C instructions provide that data from
samples taken in the past may be used in lieu of the otherwise required
sampling for application purposes if the samples meet all data
requirements, all samples were taken no more than three years before
application submission, and all data are representative of the present
discharge.
The EPA received several comments on the proposed addition of 40
CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) (and conforming changes to the substance of Form
2C). Comments focused on the three years versus four and one-half years
for acceptable data age, whether the one-year of summary data provision
should be allowed, what constitutes representative samples, and general
suggestions attempting to make the rule clearer.
After reviewing public comment, the EPA has decided to finalize its
proposal to allow the use of data collected up to four and one-half
years prior to the date of permit application, but has decided not to
finalize other proposed elements in 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) due to
differences in data reporting requirements for POTWs in Form 2A and
non-POTWs in Form 2C
Specifically, commenters noted that the proposed revisions to 40
CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) required that ``All existing data . . . that is
collected within four and one-half years of the application must be
included in the pollutant data summary submitted by the applicant.''
Commenters noted that this requirement was not consistent with the
NPDES recordkeeping requirement at 40 CFR 122.41(j)(2), which requires
that most effluent monitoring data be retained for three years.
Further, commenters noted that the use of the term ``summary data''
that was appropriate in the context of reporting under the POTW
application requirements, was confusing with respect to the data
reporting format required for non-POTWs in Form 2C.
With respect to the proposed revision that non-POTW applicants
``must'' provide all data from the past four and one-half years, the
EPA agrees that the proposed requirement is inconsistent with the
existing recordkeeping requirements, and has revised the provision to
track the long-standing language in the instructions to Form C. The
final data age provision at 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) allows applicants
to use data up to four and one-half years, but does not require four
and one-half years of data. As discussed in the preamble to the
proposed rule, the EPA has determined that the four and one-half year
data age allowance, rather than the three-year allowance mentioned only
in the existing Form 2C instructions, provides applicants with
additional flexibility and a more practical timeframe (i.e., their
previous five-year permit term minus the 180-day application period)
for collection of effluent characterization data. This four and one-
half year timeframe has been in place for POTWs since the revisions to
Form 2A were promulgated in 1999, and the EPA has seen no problems
associated with this existing POTW requirement.
Consistent with the language from the existing Form 2C application
instructions, the final provision at 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) also
clarifies that existing data may only be used where they remain
representative of the current discharge characteristics. With respect
to comments regarding whether data are ``representative'' of the
discharge, the EPA considers the discussion and examples included in
the existing and revised instructions to the application forms to
provide the appropriate level of detail.
[[Page 3329]]
The final regulatory provision at 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) also
removes the term ``summary data'' which the EPA agrees is unnecessary
and confusing with respect to the data reporting format in Form 2C.
(e) Reporting Electronic Mail Address
The EPA is finalizing revisions to the following paragraphs in 40
CFR 122.21 to request the applicant's electronic mailing address
(email) as proposed: 40 CFR 122.21(c)(2)(ii)(B), 40 CFR 122.21(f)(4),
40 CFR 122.21(j)(1)(ii), 40 CFR 122.21(j)(1)(viii)(2) and (3), 40 CFR
122.21(j)(9), 40 CFR 122.21(q)(1)(i), 40 CFR 122.21(q)(2)(i), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(8)(vi)(A), 40 CFR 122.21(q)(9)(iii)(D) and (E), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(9)(iv)(A), 40 CFR 122.21(q)(10)(ii)(A), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(10)(iii)(K)(1), 40 CFR 122.21(q)(11)(ii)(A), 40 CFR
122.21(q)(12)(i), and 40 CFR 122.21(q)(13). The EPA received one public
comment associated with these revisions. The comment expressed general
support for these revisions, and did not contain any substantive
comments requiring the EPA's response.
(f) Reporting Numbers of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Non-
Significant Categorical Industrial Users (NSCIUs)
The CWA directs the EPA to publish ``regulations establishing
pretreatment standards for introduction of pollutants into treatment
works'' (33 U.S.C. 1317). Under the NPDES regulations at 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6), POTW permit applicants must provide certain information
for SIUs that discharge to the treatment works (33 U.S.C. 1314(i) and
1317). SIUs are either industrial dischargers that: Deliver either
large volumes (daily average of 25,000 gallons or more) of wastewater
to the POTW for final treatment, are subject to Categorical
Pretreatment Standards (known as categorical industrial users or
``CIUs''), or both. The wastewater from these facilities may affect the
operation and performance of the POTW, and may contain pollutants that
are otherwise uncharacteristic of domestic sewage. In the Proposed
Rule, the EPA proposed revisions to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i) and (ii) of
the NPDES application regulations to reflect changes in the definition
of SIU in the general pretreatment regulations at 40 CFR 403.3(v).
Before a 2005 regulation which streamlined the pretreatment regulations
for existing and new sources (70 FR 60191), all CIUs were defined as
SIUs.\12\ The 2005 regulation changed the definition to authorize the
POTW Control Authority \13\ to determine that certain CIUs meeting
prescribed conditions could be classified as non-significant CIUs
(NSCIUs) as opposed to SIUs. The ability to designate a CIU as an NSCIU
resulted in reduced reporting requirements for the facility as well as
the control authority because permittees are not required to report
information about NSCIUs as often.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 70 FR 60134, October 14, 2005.
\13\ ``Control authority,'' defined at 403.3(f), means a POTW
with an approved POTW pretreatment program; or, in the absence of a
POTW pretreatment program, the authorized state pretreatment
program; or the EPA in the absence of an authorized state
pretreatment program.
\14\ CIUs must report in June and December each year (or more
frequently) on their continued compliance with categorical
pretreatment standards and submit those reports to the
(pretreatment) Control Authority. 40 CFR 403.12(e)(1). Significant
non-CIUs (SIUs not subject to categorical pretreatment standards)
must also report similar information every 6 months to the Control
Authority (403.12(h). Where, however, a facility is designated as an
NSCIU, it need only submit annual reports certifying that it never
discharges more than 100 gallons of total categorical wastewater on
any given day, and information to support that certification. 40 CFR
403.12(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this action, the EPA is finalizing some of the changes to 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6)(i) identified in the Proposed Rule. Prior to this final
rule, the EPA's regulations and application Form 2A asked for the
number of CIUs and the number of SIUs. By changing the requirement to
report only the number of SIUs and NSCIUs, instead of CIUs, the
permitting authority will gain a clearer picture in Form 2A of the
number of CIUs that are designated as NSCIUs since all CIUs are
categorized as either SIUs or NSCIUs.
While the EPA did not receive any comments in opposition to this
proposed revision to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i), the EPA received comments
and questions regarding the inclusion of the phrase ``trucked or hauled
wastes'' in its definition of SIU to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i). By
including this phrase, the EPA intended to clarify that the reported
number should include not only those SIUs and NSCIUs directly connected
to the POTW, but also those SIUs and NSCIUs that truck or haul their
wastes to the POTW. This rule does not change how trucked or hauled
wastes are defined or regulated under the pretreatment program. Based
on the comments received, the EPA has modified the final version of the
provision from what was proposed to clarify that the number of SIUs and
NSCIUs reported on application forms pursuant to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i)
includes the number of SIUs and NSCIUs that deliver their waste to the
POTW through means other than direct connection (e.g., pipe), including
delivery via truck or haul.
The EPA received additional comments regarding the proposed
revisions to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii). Multiple comments raised the
concern that, as proposed, 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii) would require POTWs
to report detailed information on a potentially significant number of
CIUs which the control authority determined to be NSCIUs. Commenters
suggested that this would increase the reporting burden for the POTW
and would run counter to the flexibility provided by 40 CFR 403.3(v).
The EPA agrees and is not finalizing the proposed revision to 40
CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii) so that the changes in this final rule carry
forward the burden reduction established by previous changes to 40 CFR
403.3(v) and 403.12(q). In accordance with 40 CFR 403.3(v) and
403.12(q), the pretreatment control authority determines that NSCIUs
consistently comply with all applicable categorical pretreatment
standards, annually submit a certification and data necessary to
support the certification, and never discharge any untreated
concentrated wastewater. Additionally, in determining whether a CIU is
an NSCIU, the control authority must find that the NSCIU has no
reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation.
Annual reports and supporting data submitted to the control authority
contain the information sought in 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii)(A) through
(G). As a result, requiring POTWs to submit detailed information for
all NSCIUs, as proposed in 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii), would negate the
burden reduction provided by 403.3(v) and 403.12(q). Therefore, the EPA
is not finalizing the proposed revision to 40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(ii) and
is instead retaining the previous requirements applicable only to SIUs
to provide specific information. The requirements in 40 CFR
122.21(j)(6)(ii)(A)-(G) to provide specific information do not apply to
NSCIUs.
(g) Cooling Water Intake Structure Indication (40 CFR 122.21(f)(9))
The EPA is finalizing the proposed revision to add paragraph 40 CFR
122.21(f)(9), with modification. The final rule requires the applicant
to indicate whether the facility uses cooling water and to specify the
source of the cooling water. The EPA is not finalizing the
parenthetical note provided in the proposed version of 40 CFR
122.21(f)(9). The EPA has determined that the explanation about the
applicability of application requirements under 40 CFR 122.21(r) is
[[Page 3330]]
best placed in the application form instructions. The parenthetical
note to 40 CFR 122.21(f)(9) in the proposed rulemaking was not a
proposed new requirement and would have imposed no new additional
requirements.
Most of the public comments received on this revision were
supportive; however, one comment questioned the purpose and need for
this revision, and suggested the requirement would create additional
burden and costs on facilities that use cooling water, but are not
subject to the requirements at 40 CFR 122.21(r). No specific costs or
burdens were shared or suggested by the commenter.
The EPA agrees that all facilities, not just those subject to 40
CFR 122.21(r), would be subject to the requirement to indicate the use
and source of cooling water; however, the EPA has determined that this
requirement would not cause undue burden or impose any significant
costs. By requiring indication of the use and source of cooling water,
a permitting authority will receive key information necessary to
effectively and efficiently develop an NPDES permit for the facility.
For facilities already covered by 40 CFR 122.21(r), the final provision
would notify the permitting authority that the application information
under 40 CFR 122.21(r) is forthcoming. For facilities that are not
already covered by 40 CFR 122.21(r), the final provision would provide
valuable information on cooling water intake structures at minimal
burden to the applicant. The final rule revision does not alter any
existing requirements in 40 CFR 122.21(r) or 40 CFR 125.91.
h. Indication of Requests for Technology-Based Variances (40 CFR
122.21(f) and 122.21(j))
The EPA is finalizing revisions, as proposed, to 40 CFR 122.21(f)
and 122.21(j) to require applicants to indicate whether they are
requesting any of the technology-based variances allowed under 40 CFR
122.21(m) for non-POTWs and 40 CFR 122.21(n) for POTWs.
While some public comments received on this revision expressed
support, other comments suggested that there may be instances where it
would not be known whether a technology-based variance would be
requested at the time of application.
The final rule ensures the permitting authority is aware of a
technology-based variance request, if known, at the time of permit
application, which will enable the permitting authority to more
effectively and efficiently coordinate with the applicant and
appropriate regulators on the technology-based variance request. The
EPA acknowledges that there may be some instances where an applicant
will not yet know at the time of application whether they will request
a technology-based variance. The final rule does not and is not
intended to limit an applicant's ability to request a technology-based
variance only to the time of application. The final rule does not alter
any existing requirements in 40 CFR 122.21(m) or 40 CFR 122.21(n), and
an applicant continues to be able to request a technology-based
variance consistent with existing statutory and regulatory
requirements.
4. Best Management Practices (BMPs) (40 CFR 122.44(k)(4))
The EPA is finalizing the correction to the Note to 40 CFR
122.44(k)(4), Best Management Practices (BMPs), as proposed to delete
outdated references to information sources that are no longer
available. The final Note also includes the website address where
updated BMP information is contained to ensure that the most current
BMP guidance is provided.
The EPA received several comments on the proposed correction,
including those from a municipality, trade associations, an authorized
state NPDES program, and a state association. Several of the comments
recommended that the listed BMP guidance documents be replaced by a
general reference to the website where updated BMP guidance documents
are contained to ensure that the most current BMP guidance is provided.
One commenter also felt that listing some but not all documents in the
note could imply that the included documents are preferred by the EPA,
when others may be just or more appropriate for use by states. While
the EPA agrees that the list of documents is not exhaustive, the Agency
has maintained the list of existing guidance document titles and
associated EPA publication numbers because it will save permitting
authorities, regulated entities, and the public time when they seek
these documents by using the EPA National Service Center for
Environmental Publications (NSCEP) website (https://www.epa.gov/nscep).
Additionally, existing text in the Note to 40 CFR 122.44(k)(4) makes
clear that updates to the listed documents may also be available and
all guidance documents are available to the public through the NSCEP
website.
B. Revisions to Part 124
1. Public Notice Requirements (40 CFR 124.10(c))
The CWA requires that a ``copy of each permit application and each
permit issued [under 402 of the Act] shall be available to the public''
(33 U.S.C. 1342(j)). The CWA also requires that notice be provided to
the public, as well as any other state whose waters may be affected, of
each NPDES permit application and that an opportunity be provided for a
public hearing before ruling on each permit application. 33 U.S.C.
1342(a)(2) and (b)(3). The EPA is finalizing 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(iv) to
allow permitting authorities to provide public notice of permitting
actions for NPDES major individual and general permits on the
permitting authority's publicly available website in lieu of the
newspaper publication requirement in 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(i). In
addition, the EPA is finalizing the requirement to post the draft
permit and fact sheet on the permitting authority's publicly available
website for the duration of the public comment period where the
permitting authority chooses to use online public notice for a draft
permit. However, the EPA is not finalizing the proposed requirement for
a permitting authority that chooses the option to use website public
notice to additionally post the final permit, fact sheet and response
to comments on the website for the entire term of the permit. The final
rule meets the objectives of the EPA's proposal, although the EPA made
some changes to the regulatory language in response to public comments
and after further consideration of the Agency's policy objectives and
existing regulatory language. The EPA's objectives in the proposal were
to provide permitting authorities with an alternative method of
providing notice of permit applications and hearings, and affirm
flexibility in reaching the public through a variety of methods that
would greatly expand public access to applications and draft permits.
In addition to the substantive changes described in the following
section, the final rule also includes editorial changes that are not
substantive in nature.
Most of the public comments received on providing the option for
online posting of public notice via the permitting authority's website
in lieu of newspaper publication were supportive. Some comments urged
the EPA to retain the option of, or require, public notice in local
daily and weekly publications (e.g., newspapers), citing environmental
justice (EJ) concerns, lack of access to the internet for certain
populations and communities who do not use the
[[Page 3331]]
internet for religious or other reasons (e.g., Amish, Mennonite, and
Hutterite) as the need for public notice in printed publications. While
some comments suggested that only members of the public already aware
of where to seek information about permits would have easy access to
the public notice and permit documents, many comments also stated that
allowing public notice online in lieu of printed publications would
result in notice to the broadest possible audience as well as modernize
public notice options and potentially allow the permitting authority to
save time and money. After consideration of these comments, the EPA is
finalizing the option for online public notice for the NPDES actions
described in 40 CFR 124.10(a)(1), as well as the regulatory note
reminding the permitting authority to ensure that the method(s) of
public notice used effectively informs all interested communities and
allows access to the permitting process for those seeking to
participate. The EPA expects that this would include newspaper notices
in areas that continue to be best served by printed publications with
NPDES-regulated entities owned or operated by identifiable populations
(e.g., Amish, Mennonite, and Hutterite) who do not use certain
technologies (e.g., computers or electricity) and areas known or likely
to include members of identifiable populations who do not have access
to or use certain technologies. The EPA also expects that this would
include newspaper notices in areas known or likely to have limited
broadband internet access, areas with underserved or economically
disadvantaged communities, areas with prolonged electrical system
outrages, and during large-scale disasters (e.g., hurricanes).
As noted in the preamble to the Proposed Rule,\15\ the EPA has
carefully evaluated the potential effect of this revision on
underserved communities with EJ concerns. In formulating the proposal,
the EPA consulted a study conducted by Native Public Media that found
that the primary source for national and international news among
Native American tribes is the internet.\16\ Newspapers were listed as
only the third most commonly used source for news. The EPA also
consulted the final National Environmental Justice Advisory Council
(NEJAC), EJ in Permitting Subgroup Report.\17\ The report states that
``[n]otification of the public by publishing in the legal section of
regional newspapers is antiquated and ineffective. This method should
not be counted on to communicate, even if legally required.''
\18\[thinsp]The NEJAC specifically listed website postings as a method
to ensure meaningful public participation. Given, among other things,
the wide availability of the internet and based on the EJ in Permitting
Subgroup Report's results, the EPA concludes that notice via the
internet would be a viable and effective method of informing the public
of the NPDES actions listed in 40 CFR 124.10(a)(1). Mandating
publication of public notice in newspapers in all cases was appropriate
when 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(i) was promulgated in 1982, 12 years before
the internet became widely available for public and commercial use.
Now, however, websites, along with tailored methods to ensure they are
consulted, are often more appropriate avenues for widely disseminating
information to the public, and many states currently supplement the
required newspaper publication by posting NPDES actions on their
websites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 81 FR 31359 (May 18, 2016).
\16\ Morris, Traci L, and Sascha D. Meinrath. ``New Media,
Technology and internet Use in Indian Country'' Native Public Media,
available at https://www.atalm.org/sites/default/files/NPM-NAF_New_Media_Study_2009_small.pdf.
\17\ See, ``Enhancing Environmental Justice in EPA Permitting
Program.'' National Environmental Justice Advisory Council. April
2011, available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/ej-in-permitting-report-2011.pdf.
\18\ Id., p.20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the purpose of this revision is to provide permitting
authorities with flexibility in reaching their public in a way that is
most effective for their communities (e.g., newspaper publication,
internet notice, or a combination of these methods). Although neither
the CWA nor its implementing regulations specify the best or preferred
method for providing notice to the public, 40 CFR 25.3(c)(7)
specifically emphasizes that agencies should ``use all feasible means
to create opportunities for public participation, and to stimulate and
support participation.'' Additionally, 40 CFR 124.10(c)(4) states that
public notice of NPDES actions listed in 40 CFR 124.10(a)(1) shall be
given by ``[a]ny other method reasonably calculated to give actual
notice of the action in question to the persons potentially affected by
it, including press releases or any other forum or medium to elicit
public participation.'' Therefore, permitting authorities are required
to consider the appropriate method or methods to best inform and engage
with their public.
Permitting authorities continue to have the option to publish
public notices in local daily and weekly newspaper publications. The
EPA's decision to allow an option for online public notice does not
alter the existing requirements of 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(i) if a
permitting authority chooses to continue the traditional method of
providing notice of an NPDES permit action in a newspaper publication.
To ensure all interested parties are aware of permitting authorities'
intended method(s) of public notification, the EPA expects permitting
authorities to make their public aware of whether public notices will
be made available online, both online and in local newspapers, or
solely in local newspaper publications. In addition, the EPA's decision
to allow an option for online public notice does not in any way affect
the requirements of 40 CFR 124.10(c)(1) which require that a copy of
the notice must be mailed directly to persons who have joined the
appropriate mailing list. 40 CFR 124.10(c)(1)(ix)(C) requires
notification of the public of the opportunity to be put on the mailing
list through periodic publication in the public press and in such
publications as regional and state funded newsletters, environmental
bulletins, or state law journals. In addition, permitting authorities
could clearly advertise on the website or in print the ability to sign
up for notifications of draft permits via paper mail or email to ensure
that all interested parties are aware of and receive effective
notification of permitting actions. Further, the EPA's revisions to the
public notice requirements for certain enumerated actions in 40 CFR
124.10 do not affect the notice requirements for ``issuance'' of final
permit decisions, and the EPA is in no way suggesting that internet
posting fulfills the separate final permit decision notice requirements
of 40 CFR 124.15.
Public comments received on the proposed requirement to post permit
documentation (e.g., final permit, fact sheet, response to comments)
online for the term of the permit were mixed. Opposing comments
suggested that maintaining permit documentation online for the duration
of the permit term would further strain the limited resources of
permitting authorities, especially related to creating and maintaining
a website and increasing server storage for archived materials. Some
comments suggested that these related capital and operating costs would
exceed any cost savings from foregoing printing the public notice in
local newspaper publications. The EPA is aware of state and EPA
permitting
[[Page 3332]]
authorities that already post final permits and fact sheets on their
websites for the duration of the permit. The EPA supports and
encourages the continuation of this additional transparency; however,
based on the comments received from permitting authorities concerned
with the most effective use of their resources, the Agency is not
finalizing the requirement to maintain the permit documentation on the
website for the term of the permit. Instead, where the permitting
authority opts for online public notice of a draft permit, as defined
in 40 CFR 122.2,\19\ the draft permit and fact sheet must be posted on
the permitting authority's website for the duration of the public
comment period, when the public's need for timely access to permitting
documents is the greatest. This posting is in addition to meeting the
existing requirements in 40 CFR 124.10(d), which outline the required
contents of public notices for all NPDES actions described in 40 CFR
124.10(a)(1). This additional requirement for posting draft permits and
fact sheets will ensure that interested members of the public are not
only aware of the information contained in the public notice document,
but are able to view the contents of the draft permit and fact sheet
online, as well. Typically, permitting authorities provide copies of
final permits upon request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Draft permit means a document prepared under 40 CFR 124.6
indicating the Director's tentative decision to issue or deny,
modify, revoke and reissue, terminate, or reissue a ``permit.'' A
notice of intent to terminate a permit, and a notice of intent to
deny a permit, as discussed in 40 CFR 124.5, are types of ``draft
permits.'' A denial of a request for modification, revocation and
reissuance, or termination, as discussed in 40 CFR 124.5, is not a
``draft permit.'' A ``proposed permit'' is not a ``draft permit.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be clear, online public notice is an option for all NPDES
actions described in 40 CFR 124.10(a)(1), which includes more than
draft permits. However, for the NPDES actions described in 40 CFR
124.10(a)(1) other than draft permits, there would not be a draft
permit or fact sheet to post on the permitting authority's publicly
available website for the duration of the public comment period.
Therefore, the EPA is specifying in the final rule that the requirement
to post the draft permit and fact sheet on the website for the duration
of the public comment period applies only for public notice of draft
permits as defined in 122.2. The EPA expects permitting authorities
using the option for online public notices to publish the information
in a prominent, clear, and easily accessible location on their public
website. The EPA notes that in meeting the requirement to make the
draft permit and fact sheet available for the duration of the public
comment period, the permitting authority's website must clearly include
a link to access these documents, while the actual document could be
hosted elsewhere, such as in a repository of permit documents.
In the Proposed Rule, the EPA also requested comments on, but did
not propose specific regulatory text for, three additional topics
related to the public notice regulations: (1) Revising 40 CFR 124.10(c)
to require NPDES permitting authorities to public notice all NPDES
permits and hearings on the permitting authority's publicly available
website; (2) whether proposed revisions to public notice requirements
in 40 CFR 124.10(c) should be expanded to include NPDES non-major
individual and general permits; and (3) ways in which NPDES permits and
fact sheets could be posted electronically to make it easier for the
Agency's Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) information
system to link to the permit fact sheets. The comments received on
these three additional topics generally expressed confusion or
requested clarification about what the EPA intended. Based on these
comments, the EPA has decided not to make changes to the public notice
regulations to address these issues at this time.
The EPA's decision to allow public notice of permitting actions for
NPDES major individual and general permits on the permitting
authority's publicly available website, in lieu of the newspaper
publication requirement, increases transparency and promotes
opportunities for public involvement. It also preserves states'
flexibility to notice in a way that best ensures their public will be
given a meaningful opportunity to participate in the NPDES permitting
process. While mandating public notice of permitting activities in
newspapers was appropriate when 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(i) was promulgated
in 1982, the EPA recognizes that websites, along with other tailored
means for ensuring the public consults the website, are often more
appropriate avenues for widely disseminating information to the public.
C. Revisions to Part 125
1. Deletion of 40 CFR 125.3(a)(1)(ii))
The EPA is finalizing, as proposed, the deletion of 40 CFR
125.3(a)(1)(ii) to remove an outdated regulation that is no longer
applicable. The regulation was derived from statutory authority that
was repealed in 1981. The removal of this provision from the
regulations will avoid confusion regarding its applicability.
III. Rule Revisions Not Finalized in This Action
The EPA is not finalizing the proposed changes to 40 CFR 122.3(a)
due to the recent enactment of the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act,
which exempts discharges incidental to the normal operations of a
vessel from NPDES permitting requirements consistent with the existing
regulatory language at 40 CFR 122.3(a).
In addition, the EPA received numerous comments on proposed
revisions to the following eleven regulatory sections. The Agency
requires additional time to analyze these comments and deliberate on
appropriate next steps and thus is not taking final action on the
proposed revisions to these at this time. The EPA has not made any
final substantive decisions with respect to the proposed revisions to
these sections.
At this time, the EPA is deferring final action on the proposed
revisions to:
1. Definition of Proposed Permit (40 CFR 122.2)
2. Definition of Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) (40 CFR 122.2)
3. Application Requirements--Latitude and Longitude (40 CFR
122.21(f)(2); (g)(1); (h)(1); (i)(1)(iii); (j)(1)(i); (j)(3)(i)(C);
(j)(8)(ii)(A)(3); (k)(1); (q)(1)(i); (q)(8)(ii)(A); (q)(9)(iii)(B);
(q)(10)(iii)(B); (q)(11)(iii)(B); (q)(12)(i); (r)(3)(ii))
4. Reasonable Potential Determinations for New Discharges (40 CFR
122.44(d))
5. Dilution Allowances (40 CFR 122.44(d))
6. Antidegradation Reference (40 CFR 122.44(d))
7. Anti-backsliding (40 CFR 122.44(l))
8. Design Flows for POTWs (40 CFR 122.45(b))
9. Objection to Administratively Continued Permits (40 CFR 123.44)
10. CWA Section 401 Certification Process (40 CFR 124.55(b))
11. Fact Sheet Requirements (40 CFR 124.56)
IV. Impacts
This final rule involves minor, mostly clarifying revisions to the
NPDES regulations. It is the EPA's view that many of these revisions
will generally not result in new or increased impacts or information
collection by authorized states or the regulated community. It is also
the EPA's view that in some cases, the revisions finalized in this
action, including deleting outdated information, modernizing public
notice options, and clarifying requirements,
[[Page 3333]]
will reduce burden. As the EPA modifies the NPDES application forms to
conform with the regulatory changes in this rule, it is also
modernizing the instructions and format of the application forms. As
discussed below, the changes to the instructions and format of the
application forms will also reduce burdens. A summary of the impacts
assessment is provided in this section for each topic.
Purpose and Scope of the NPDES Program (40 CFR 122.1)
The revision to this note is being made to inform the public of
ways to contact the NPDES program and will not result in changes to the
existing program or program requirements. The note in the past
regulation contained an outdated address and telephone number for the
EPA's Office of Water. Providing updated information will save the
permitting authorities and the public time when they seek to contact
the EPA about these regulations.
NPDES Program Definitions: Pesticide Discharges to Waters of the United
States From Pesticide Application, Pesticide Residue, and New
Discharger (40 CFR 122.2)
The final revisions to the NPDES program definitions at 40 CFR
122.2 for ``pesticide discharges to waters of the United States from
pesticide application,'' ``pesticide residue,'' and ``new discharger''
will not result in a change to the burden associated with this
information collection. These revisions are being made to improve
programmatic clarity and would not result in substantive changes to the
existing program or program requirements.
Adding definitions for ``pesticide discharges to waters of the
United States from pesticide application'' and ``pesticide residue''
brings the NPDES definitions in concert with the way the EPA's
Pesticide General Permit has been interpreting and regulating such
applications since 2011. These definitions would not change burden and
would not change the universe of permittees and activities that the
Pesticide General Permit covers.
The EPA is correcting a typographical error in paragraph (d) of the
definition ``New discharger'' by correcting ``NDPES'' to ``NPDES.''
Application Requirements (40 CFR 122.21)
The final revisions to 40 CFR 122.21 related to application
requirements together with the modifications to the instructions and
format of the existing application forms would result in a reduction in
burden. In fact, the EPA estimates that the changes to various
application requirements will result in a total reduction to permittees
and permitting authorities of 17,912 hours and $1,023,042 in costs per
year. These savings estimates consist of both specific changes to the
information being collected on forms and general efforts to reformat
forms for increased clarity. For more details, please refer to section
12 of the ICR Supporting Statement in the docket of this rule (Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0145) and the docket associated with this rule's
ICR (Docket ID EPA-HQ-OW-2018-0629).
Changes to Information Previously Collected by the EPA
The EPA is revising several data fields to refine the content and
improve the consistency among the forms, to improve the consistency
with the Agency's current data standards, and improve the clarity and
usability of the forms. For example, for every question where it is
applicable, the revised forms direct the applicant to ``stop'' or
``skip'' to the next appropriate question depending on the applicant's
response. As another example, the revisions to Form 2A create a
consistent format with the other forms by reformatting the previous
sections A, B, and C into six major sections with detailed
instructions. Further, instructions are provided for Form 2B for the
very first time.
Revisions to the instructions and format of the application forms
will make them easier to use and understand and is expected to result
in a decrease in effort for permittees applying for coverage. The EPA
also expects that the revisions will improve the quality of information
being collected, which may reduce the need for follow-up questions and
data requests, and the time necessary for the permitting authority to
develop a permit. The EPA expects such efforts to reformat forms for
increased clarity to result in a reduction of 25,426 hours and
$1,534,937 in costs based on an estimated 20,663 responses or
applications per year.
New Information To Be Collected by the EPA
The estimated burden associated with the new requirement for
permittees to report up to four NAICS codes on application Form 1 (40
CFR 122.21(f)(3) is expected to result in a burden increase of 1,224
hours and $73,893 in added costs based on an estimated 12,240 responses
or applications per year. The estimated burden associated with the new
requirement for permittees to provide an email address in Forms 1, 2A,
2B, and 2S (multiple locations in 40 CFR 122.21) is expected to result
in a burden increase of 11,526 hours and $695,839 in added costs based
on an estimated 20,663 responses or applications per year. This
increased burden is applicable to permittees only. Permitting
authorities (authorized states and the EPA) are expected to experience
reduced burden associated with more efficient communication. The
estimated burden associated with this new requirement for permitting
authorities is a reduction of 5,005 hours and savings of $247,235 per
year for state permitting authorities based on 20,019 responses per
year.
The estimated burden associated with the change in reporting
requirements for permittees reporting the number of SIUs and NSCIUs (40
CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i)) is expected to result in a burden decrease of 77
hours and $3,804 for state permitting authorities based on an estimated
306 responses or applications per year. It is not estimated to result
in a change of burden for permittees.
The estimated burden associated with the revision that requires the
applicant to indicate whether the facility uses cooling water and to
specify the source of the cooling water (40 CFR 122.21(f)(9)) is
expected to result in additional burden of 73 hours and $4,416 for
power plants and manufacturers that use cooling water, based on an
estimated 293 responses or applications per year. For permitting
authorities, the revision is expected to result in more efficient
permitting because the permitting authority can initiate data
submissions and reviews earlier in the permitting process. The EPA
estimates this will result in a burden decrease of 227 hours and
$11,214 for state permitting authorities based on 227 responses or
application per year.
The revision that requests an applicant to indicate whether they
are seeking a technology variance (40 CFR 122.21(f)(10) and 122.21(j))
is estimated to have such a small impact due to the small number of
technology variance requests made per year that this impact is assumed
to be 0 hours and no change in burden. Similarly, the revision that
requires new POTW dischargers to provide data for specific analytes (40
CFR 122.21(j)(4)(i) and whole effluent toxicity (40 CFR
122.21(j)(5)(i)) within 24 months of commencement of discharge is
estimated to incur no additional burden or costs. Permitting
authorities typically require characterization data requirements for
new dischargers in the initial NPDES permit, and the only variation
made
[[Page 3334]]
pursuant to this rule is the timeframe (24 months) for collecting and
reporting the data.
Best Management Practices (BMPs) (40 CFR 122.44(k)(4))
The revision to this note is being made to ensure the public is
aware of the most current BMP guidance because the note in the past
regulation contained outdated references to information sources that
are no longer available. This revision will not result in a change to
the burden associated with this information collection.
Public Notice Requirements (40 CFR 124.10(c))
The EPA is finalizing 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(iv) to allow permitting
authorities to provide public notice of permitting actions for NPDES
major individual and general permits on the permitting authority's
publicly available website in lieu of the newspaper publication
requirement in 40 CFR 124.10(c)(2)(i). In addition, where the
permitting authority chooses to use online public notice for a draft
permit, the EPA is finalizing the requirement to post the draft permit
and fact sheet on the permitting authority's publicly available website
for the duration of the public comment period. However, the EPA is not
finalizing the proposed requirement for a permitting authority that
chooses the option to use website public notice to additionally post
all final permits, fact sheets, and response to comments on the website
for the entire term of the permit. The purpose of this revision is to
provide the permitting authority with an alternative method of
providing notice of permit applications and hearings and provide
flexibility to reach communities in a variety of methods. It is the
EPA's understanding that the traditional approach to newspaper
publication has become costly for permitting authorities to implement.
The EPA's final revisions intend to alleviate those costs by allowing
the permitting authority to use its publicly available website as an
alternative to the traditional newspaper publication.
At the time of the proposed rulemaking, the EPA estimated the cost
of public notice of draft permits in newspapers for NPDES major
facilities, sewage sludge facilities and general permits to be
approximately $1.6 million per year, nationally.\20\ This estimate
excluded the costs of preparing the content of the NPDES public notice,
and the costs of the other methods to provide notice besides newspaper
publication, such as direct mailing. Based on information provided in
the public comments received on the proposed rulemaking, the cost to
post a public notice online was estimated to be $113 per notice;
whereas the cost to post a public notice in a newspaper was estimated
to be $1,416 per notice.\21\ The EPA estimates that issuance of public
notice via website in lieu of newspaper results in a burden reduction
of $1,303 per NPDES action (a total reduction of $1,419,673 per
year).\22\ The rule allows but does not require state and federal
permitting authorities to use electronic public notice instead of
newspaper publication. In developing burden estimates, the EPA assumed
that states and the EPA would continue to publish at least some
notifications in newspapers, and therefore the burden associated with
public notice would not be reduced in those instances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ In the preamble to the proposed rulemaking, the EPA used
$1,000 (in 2010$) as the publication cost for a public notice in a
newspaper and assumed that there are 1,600 NPDES permit actions that
require public notice via newspaper publication each year; thus, we
arrive at the $1.6 million per year estimate. (81 FR 31366, May 18,
2016).
\21\ See the EPA's ICR No. 0229.23, Animal Sector public notice
burden estimates, adjusted for inflation using https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm.
\22\ The EPA based these estimates on authorized states
providing public notice for 1,049 individual permits online per
year, and the EPA providing public notice for 41 general permits
online per year at a savings of $1,303 per notice. This is estimated
to result in savings of $-1,366,847 and $-52,826 for states and the
EPA, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deletion of 40 CFR 125.3(a)(1)(ii)
The deletion of 40 CFR 125.3 (a)(1)(ii) from the NPDES regulations
will not result in change to the burden associated with this
requirement. By deleting this outdated provision, the EPA clarifies
that this provision no longer applies to regulated entities.
V. Compliance Dates
With this final action, authorized states, territories, and tribes
have up to one year to revise, as necessary, their NPDES regulations to
adopt the requirements of this rule, or two years if statutory changes
are needed, as provided at 40 CFR 123.62. At a minimum, the EPA
anticipates any permitting authority using state-developed NPDES
application forms would need to update their regulations and
application forms, as needed, in order to be in compliance with the
application requirements finalized in this rulemaking.
The EPA recognizes that each authorized program has unique state
statutes and regulations, and that many of the revisions finalized in
this rule are clarifying in nature. As a result, the EPA anticipates
that in most instances, the program revisions that will be occurring to
conform to this rule will be nonsubstantial, as contemplated in 40 CFR
123.62. For those instances where the EPA determines that an authorized
program's conforming program revision is substantial, the process
outlined in 40 CFR 123.62(b)(2) will be followed. In addition,
authorized programs may have to update their NPDES program documents
(e.g., program description, Attorney General statement) to reflect
these revisions, whether they are substantial or nonsubstantial. See 40
CFR 123.62(b)(1).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is a significant regulatory action that was submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. Any revisions
made in response to interagency review have been documented in the
docket for this action.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is considered an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. Details on the estimated cost savings of this final rule can be
found in the rule's economic analysis.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The information collection activities in this rule has been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the PRA. The Information Collection Request (ICR) document that
the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2575.01. It will be
assigned an OMB control number upon approval by OMB. You can find a
copy of the ICR submitted to OMB in the docket for this rule, and it is
briefly summarized here. The information collection requirements are
not enforceable--and EPA cannot collect any information set out in the
ICR--until OMB approves them. In additional, the EPA will post a copy
of the final ICR to the docket for this rule upon approval by OMB.
CWA section 402 and the NPDES regulations require collection of
information primarily used by permitting authorities, permittees, and
the EPA to make NPDES permitting decisions. The burden and costs
associated with the entire NPDES
[[Page 3335]]
program are accounted in an approved ICR (EPA ICR number 0229.23, OMB
control no. 2040-0004). This final rule and the corresponding updated
application forms require revisions to the ICR to reflect changes to
the forms and other information collection requirements. EPA is
reflecting the paperwork burden and costs associated with this rule in
a separate ICR instead of revising the existing ICR for the entire
program for administrative reasons. Eventually, EPA plans to
consolidate the burden and costs in this ICR into that master ICR for
the entire NPDES program and discontinue this separate collection. EPA
expects the changes set out in this final rule along with changes to
the instructions and format of the NPDES permit applications to result
in an overall burden decrease to permitting authorities and the
regulated community of approximately $2,389,889 and 17,912 hours
annually.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. When OMB
approves this ICR, the Agency will announce that approval in the
Federal Register and publish a technical amendment to 40 CFR part 9 to
display the OMB control number for the approved information collection
activities contained in this final rule.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This rule eliminates inconsistencies
between regulations and application forms, streamlines and updates
application forms, provides clarification to existing regulations,
deletes outdated regulatory provisions, updates Agency contact
information, and provides for new programmatic flexibility in providing
public notice on NPDES permitting actions. We have therefore concluded
that this action would have no net regulatory burden for directly
regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This final rule
eliminates inconsistencies between regulations and application forms,
streamlines and updates application forms, provides clarification to
existing regulations, deletes outdated regulatory provisions, updates
Agency contact information, and provides for new programmatic
flexibility in providing public notice on NPDES permitting actions.
This final rule does not impose significant burden on the EPA, states,
or the regulated community, or specifically, any significant burden on
any small entity. With respect to any impacts on any authorized state
programs, the costs involved in this action are imposed only by
participation in a voluntary federal program. UMRA generally excludes
from the definition of ``federal intergovernmental mandate'' duties
that arise from participation in a voluntary federal program. Thus,
this final rule is not subject to the requirements of section 202 and
205 of the UMRA. For the same reason, the EPA has determined that this
rule contains no regulatory requirements that will significantly affect
small governments. Thus, this final rule is not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. The EPA considered the impacts on tribes, and
concluded that there would be no substantial direct compliance costs or
impact on tribes. Because the purpose of the final rule is to eliminate
inconsistencies between regulations and application forms, streamline
and update application forms, provide clarification to existing
regulations, delete outdated regulatory provisions, update Agency
contact information, and provide for new programmatic flexibility in
providing public notice on NPDES permitting actions, it will not have
substantial direct effects on: Tribal governments; the relationship
between the federal government and Indian tribes; or the distribution
of power and responsibilities between the federal government and Indian
tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action and the EPA determined that tribal
consultation was not necessary for this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because these changes to procedural requirements
and forms do not address environmental health risk or safety risks.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' because it is
does not have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution
or use of energy. This final rule eliminates inconsistencies between
regulations and application forms, provides clarifications to existing
regulations, deletes outdated provisions, and provides for new
programmatic flexibility in providing public notice on NPDES permitting
actions.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This final rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations
The EPA has determined that the human health or environmental risk
addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority,
low-income or indigenous populations. This final rule eliminates
inconsistencies between regulations and application forms, provides
clarifications to existing regulations, deletes outdated provisions,
and provides for new programmatic
[[Page 3336]]
flexibility in providing public notice on NPDES permitting actions.
In addition, the EPA's final revision related to the option for
online public notice, in lieu of newspaper publication, of NPDES
actions considered potential effects on environmental justice
communities. The final rule includes a regulatory note reminding the
permitting authority to ensure that the method(s) of public notice used
effectively informs all interested communities and allows access to the
permitting process for those seeking to participate. This includes
potentially utilizing newspaper notices in areas that continue to be
best served by printed publications, such as in areas known or likely
to have limited broadband internet access, areas with underserved or
economically disadvantaged communities, areas with prolonged electrical
system outrages, and during large-scale disasters (e.g., hurricanes).
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA and the EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
U.S. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 122
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 124
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous waste, Indians--lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control, Water supply.
40 CFR Part 125
Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Waste treatment and disposal, Water pollution control.
Dated: December 21, 2018.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Acting Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, EPA amends Chapter I of
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 122--EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
0
1. The authority citation for part 122 continues to read as follows:
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Subpart A--Definitions and General Program Requirements
0
2. Section 122.1 is amended by revising ``Note to Sec. 122.1'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 122.1 Purpose and scope.
* * * * *
[Note to Sec. 122.1: Information concerning the NPDES program and
its regulations can be obtained by contacting the Water Permits
Division (4203), Office of Wastewater Management, U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460 and by visiting the
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/.]
0
3. Section 122.2 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (d) of the definition of ``new discharger''; and
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ``pesticide discharges
to waters of the United States from pesticide application'' and
``pesticide residue''.
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 122.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
New discharger * * *
(d) Which has never received a finally effective NPDES permit for
discharges at that ``site.''
* * * * *
Pesticide discharges to waters of the United States from pesticide
application means the discharges that result from the application of
biological pesticides, and the application of chemical pesticides that
leave a residue, from point sources to waters of the United States. In
the context of this definition of pesticide discharges to waters of the
United States from pesticide application, this does not include
agricultural storm water discharges and return flows from irrigated
agriculture, which are excluded by law (33 U.S.C. 1342(l); 33 U.S.C.
1362(14)).
Pesticide residue for the purpose of determining whether an NPDES
permit is needed for discharges to waters of the United States from
pesticide application, means that portion of a pesticide application
that is discharged from a point source to waters of the United States
and no longer provides pesticidal benefits. It also includes any
degradates of the pesticide.
* * * * *
Subpart B--Permit Application and Special NPDES Program
Requirements
0
4. Section 122.21 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) introductory text and (a)(2)(i)(A),
(c)(2)(ii)(B), (f) introductory text, and (f)(3) and (4);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (f)(9) and (10);
0
c. Revising paragraph (g) introductory text;
0
d. Adding paragraph (g)(7)(ix);
0
e. Revising paragraphs (j)(1)(ii) and (j)(1)(viii)(D)(2) and (3);
0
f. Adding paragraph (j)(1)(ix); and
0
g. Revising paragraphs (j)(4)(i), (j)(5)(i), (j)(6)(i), (j)(9), (k)
introductory text, (k)(5)(vi), (q)(2)(i), (q)(8)(vi) introductory text,
(q)(8)(vi)(A), (q)(9)(iii)(D) and (E), (q)(9)(iv)(A), (q)(10)(ii)(A),
(q)(10)(iii)(K)(1), (q)(11)(ii)(A), (q)(12)(i), and (q)(13).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 122.21 Application for a permit (applicable to State programs,
see Sec. 123.25).
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) All applicants for EPA-issued permits must submit applications
on EPA permit application forms. More than one application form may be
required from a facility depending on the number and types of
discharges or outfalls found there. Application forms may be obtained
by contacting: U.S. EPA, Mail Code 4203M, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460 or by visiting https://www.epa.gov/npdes.
Applications for EPA-issued permits must be submitted as follows:
(A) All applicants, other than POTWs, TWTDS, vessels, and pesticide
applicators must submit Form 1.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) The applicant's name, address, telephone number, electronic
mail address and ownership status;
* * * * *
(f) Information requirements. All applicants for NPDES permits,
other than POTWs and other TWTDS, vessels, and pesticide applicators,
must provide the information in paragraphs (f)(1) through (10) of this
section to the Director, using the application form provided by the
Director. Additional information required of applicants is set forth in
paragraphs (g) through (k) and (q) through (r) of this section.
* * * * *
[[Page 3337]]
(3) Up to four SIC and up to four NAICS codes that best reflect the
principal products or services provided by the facility.
(4) The operator's name, address, telephone number, electronic mail
address, ownership status, and status as Federal, State, private,
public, or other entity.
* * * * *
(9) An indication of whether the facility uses cooling water and
the source of the cooling water.
(10) An indication of whether the facility is requesting any of the
variances at 40 CFR 122.21(m), if known at the time of application.
(g) Application requirements for existing manufacturing,
commercial, mining, and silvicultural dischargers. Existing
manufacturing, commercial, mining, and silvicultural dischargers
applying for NPDES permits, except for those facilities subject to the
requirements of Sec. 122.21(h), shall provide the following
information to the Director, using application forms provided by the
Director.
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(ix) Where quantitative data are required in paragraphs (g)(7)(i)
through (viii) of this section, existing data may be used, if
available, in lieu of sampling done solely for the purpose of the
application, provided that: All data requirements are met; sampling was
performed, collected, and analyzed no more than four and one-half years
prior to submission; all data are representative of the discharge; and
all available representative data are considered in the values
reported.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Applicant information. Name, mailing address, telephone
number, and electronic mail address of the applicant, and indication as
to whether the applicant is the facility's owner, operator, or both;
* * * * *
(viii) * * *
(D) * * *
(2) The name, mailing address, contact person, phone number, and
electronic mail address of the organization transporting the discharge,
if the transport is provided by a party other than the applicant;
(3) The name, mailing address, contact person, phone number,
electronic mail address and NPDES permit number (if any) of the
receiving facility; and
* * * * *
(ix) An indication of whether applicant is operating under or
requesting to operate under a variance as specified at 40 CFR
122.21(n), if known at the time of application.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) As provided in paragraphs (j)(4)(ii) through (x) of this
section, all applicants must submit to the Director effluent monitoring
information for samples taken from each outfall through which effluent
is discharged to waters of the United States, except for CSOs. The
Director may allow applicants to submit sampling data for only one
outfall on a case-by-case basis, where the applicant has two or more
outfalls with substantially identical effluent. The Director may also
allow applicants to composite samples from one or more outfalls that
discharge into the same mixing zone. For POTWs applying prior to
commencement of discharge, data shall be submitted no later than 24
months after the commencement of discharge;
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(i) All applicants must provide an identification of any whole
effluent toxicity tests conducted during the four and one-half years
prior to the date of the application on any of the applicant's
discharges or on any receiving water near the discharge. For POTWs
applying prior to commencement of discharge, data shall be submitted no
later than 24 months after the commencement of discharge.
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(i) Number of significant industrial users (SIUs) and non-
significant categorical industrial users (NSCIUs), as defined at 40 CFR
403.3(v), including SIUs and NSCIUs that truck or haul waste,
discharging to the POTW; and
* * * * *
(9) Contractors. All applicants must provide the name, mailing
address, telephone number, electronic mail address and responsibilities
of all contractors responsible for any operational or maintenance
aspects of the facility; and
* * * * *
(k) Application requirements for new sources and new discharges.
New manufacturing, commercial, mining and silvicultural dischargers
applying for NPDES permits (except for new discharges of facilities
subject to the requirements of paragraph (h) of this section or new
discharges of storm water associated with industrial activity which are
subject to the requirements of Sec. 122.26(c)(1) and this section
(except as provided by Sec. 122.26(c)(1)(ii)) shall provide the
following information to the Director, using the application forms
provided by the Director:
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(vi) No later than 24 months after the commencement of discharge
from the proposed facility, the applicant is required to complete and
submit items V and VI of NPDES application Form 2C (see Sec.
122.21(g)). However, the applicant need not complete those portions of
Item V requiring tests which have already been performed and reported
under the discharge monitoring requirements of the NPDES permit.
* * * * *
(q) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The name, mailing address, telephone number, and electronic
mail address of the applicant; and
* * * * *
(8) * * *
(vi) If sewage sludge from the applicant's facility is provided to
another ``person who prepares,'' as defined at 40 CFR 503.9(r), and the
sewage sludge is not subject to paragraph (q)(8)(iv) of this section,
the applicant must provide the following information for each facility
receiving the sewage sludge:
(A) The name, mailing address, and electronic mail address of the
receiving facility;
* * * * *
(9) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) The name, mailing address, telephone number, and electronic
mail address of the site owner, if different from the applicant;
(E) The name, mailing address, telephone number, and electronic
mail address of the person who applies sewage sludge to the site, if
different from the applicant;
* * * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) Whether the applicant has contacted the permitting authority in
the State where the bulk sewage sludge subject to Sec. 503.13(b)(2)
will be applied, to ascertain whether bulk sewage sludge subject to
Sec. 503.13(b)(2) has been applied to the site on or since July 20,
1993, and if so, the name of the permitting authority and the name,
phone number, and electronic mail address if available, of a contact
person at the permitting authority;
* * * * *
(10) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The site name or number, contact person, mailing address,
telephone
[[Page 3338]]
number, and electronic mail address for the surface disposal site; and
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(K) * * *
(1) The name, contact person, mailing address, and electronic mail
address of the facility; and
* * * * *
(11) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The name and/or number, contact person, mailing address,
telephone number, and electronic mail address of the sewage sludge
incinerator; and
* * * * *
(12) * * *
(i) The name, contact person, mailing address, electronic mail
address, location, and all applicable permit numbers of the MSWLF;
* * * * *
(13) Contractors. All applicants must provide the name, mailing
address, telephone number, electronic mail address and responsibilities
of all contractors responsible for any operational or maintenance
aspects of the facility related to sewage sludge generation, treatment,
use, or disposal;
* * * * *
Subpart C--Permit Conditions
0
5. Section 122.44 is amended by revising the ``Note to paragraph
(k)(4)'' read as follows:
Sec. 122.44 Establishing limitations, standards, and other permit
conditions (applicable to State NPDES programs, see Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(4) * * *
Note to Paragraph (k)(4): Additional technical information on
BMPs and the elements of BMPs is contained in the following
documents: Guidance Manual for Developing Best Management Practices
(BMPs), October 1993, EPA No. 833/B-93-004, NTIS No. PB 94-178324,
ERIC No. W498); Storm Water Management for Construction Activities:
Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices,
September 1992, EPA No. 832/R-92-005, NTIS No. PB 92-235951, ERIC
No. N482); Storm Water Management for Construction Activities,
Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices:
Summary Guidance, EPA No. 833/R-92-001, NTIS No. PB 93-223550; ERIC
No. W139; Storm Water Management for Industrial Activities,
Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices,
September 1992; EPA 832/R-92-006, NTIS No. PB 92-235969, ERIC No.
N477; Storm Water Management for Industrial Activities, Developing
Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices: Summary
Guidance, EPA 833/R-92-002, NTIS No. PB 94-133782; ERIC No. W492.
These and other EPA guidance documents can be obtained through the
National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP) at
https://www.epa.gov/nscep. In addition, States may have BMP guidance
documents. These EPA guidance documents are listed here only for
informational purposes; they are not binding and EPA does not intend
that these guidance documents have any mandatory, regulatory effect
by virtue of their listing in this note.
* * * * *
PART 124--PROCEDURES FOR DECISIONMAKING
0
6. The authority citation for part 124 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. et
seq.; Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.; Clean Water
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A--General Program Requirements
0
7. Section 124.10 is amended by revising (c) introductory text and
adding paragraph (c)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 124.10 Public notice of permit actions and public comment
period.
* * * * *
(c) Methods (applicable to State programs, see 40 CFR 123.25
(NPDES), 145.11 (UIC), 233.26 (404), and 271.14 (RCRA)). Public notice
of activities described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be
given by the following methods:
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) For NPDES major permits and NPDES general permits, in lieu of
the requirement for publication of a notice in a daily or weekly
newspaper, as described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, the
Director may publish all notices of activities described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section to the permitting authority's public website. If
the Director selects this option for a draft permit, as defined in
Sec. 122.2, in addition to meeting the requirements in paragraph (d)
of this section, the Director must post the draft permit and fact sheet
on the website for the duration of the public comment period.
Note to paragraph (c)(2)(iv): The Director is encouraged to
ensure that the method(s) of public notice effectively informs all
interested communities and allows access to the permitting process
for those seeking to participate.
* * * * *
PART 125--CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
0
8. The authority citation for part 125 continues to read as follows:
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C., 1251 et seq., unless
otherwise noted.
Subpart A--Criteria and Standards for Imposing Technology-Based
Treatment Requirements Under Sections 301(b) and 402 of the Act
Sec. 125.3 [Amended]
0
9. Section 125.3 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph
(a)(1)(ii).
[FR Doc. 2019-01339 Filed 2-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P