Tank Vessel Response Plans for Hazardous Substances, 2800-2801 [2019-01593]
Download as PDF
2800
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
insurance requirements and company
sustainability polices, together with the
existence of new terminal inspection
protocols like that developed by the
Chemical Distribution Institute, CTAC
was unable to identify any significant
gaps in hazardous substance spill
response planning at marine
transportation-related facilities that
would be reduced by the 2000 proposed
rulemaking.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
III. Withdrawal
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is withdrawing the
proposed rulemaking so as to better
analyze the current spill response
capabilities of the chemical industry
before conducting any further
rulemaking on hazardous substance
response plans for marine
transportation-related facilities. The
Coast Guard remains committed to
fulfilling its OPA 90 mandate, however
we believe the proposed rules are no
longer appropriate as proposed.
The Coast Guard has determined that
withdrawing the proposed rule is
appropriate based on findings that the
proposed rules are no longer applicable
to the current state of spill response in
the chemical industry. Accordingly, the
Coast Guard is withdrawing the ‘‘Marine
Transportation-Related Facility
Response Plans for Hazardous
Substances’’ proposed rulemaking
announced in an NPRM published
March 31, 2000 (65 FR 17416).
ACTION:
IV. Executive Order 13771
Pmangrum on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
The withdrawal of the NPRM
qualifies as a deregulatory action under
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs), which directs agencies to reduce
regulation and control regulatory costs
and provides that ‘‘for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior
regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations
be prudently managed and controlled
through a budgeting process.’’ See the
OMB Memorandum titled ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771,
Titled ‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (April 5,
2017).
Dated: February 4, 2019.
Anthony J. Vogt,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant
Commandant for Response Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–01591 Filed 2–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 155
[Docket Number USCG–1998–4354]
RIN 1625–AA13 and 2115–AE88
Tank Vessel Response Plans for
Hazardous Substances
Coast Guard, DHS.
Proposed rule; withdrawal.
The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ‘‘Tank Vessel
Response Plans for Hazardous
Substances’’ that we published on
March 22, 1999. The Coast Guard is
withdrawing this rulemaking based on
findings that the proposed rules are no
longer appropriate to the current state of
spill response in the chemical industry.
DATES: The notice of proposed
rulemaking published March 22, 1999,
at 64 FR 13734, is withdrawn as of
February 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking is available by
searching docket number USCG–1998–
4354 using the Federal portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
withdrawal, call or email Mr.
Christopher Friese, Commercial Vessel
Safety Specialist, Office of Marine
Environmental Response Policy (CG–
MER–1), Coast Guard; telephone 202–
372–1227.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
OPA 90 Oil Pollution Act of 1990
CTAC Chemical Transportation Advisory
Committee
II. Background
The Clean Water Act,1 as amended by
section 4202(a)(6) of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990 (OPA 90),2 requires owners
or operators of tank vessels, offshore
facilities, and onshore facilities to
prepare response plans to mitigate spills
of both oils and hazardous substances.
These plans must address measures to
respond, to the maximum extent
practicable, to a worst-case discharge or
a substantial threat of such a discharge,
of oil or a hazardous substance into or
on navigable waters, adjoining
1 33
U.S.C. 1321(j)(5).
Law 101–380, 104 Stat. 484.
2 Public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
shorelines, or the exclusive economic
zone of the United States. The primary
purpose of requiring response plans is
to minimize the impact of a discharge of
oil or hazardous substances into the
navigable waters of the United States.
On May 3, 1996, we published an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
soliciting public input on regulations
concerning response plans for certain
tank vessels and marine transportationrelated facilities (61 FR 20083), and
subsequently held two public meetings
on the subject that were announced in
the Federal Register (61 FR 34775). On
March 22, 1999, we published a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register entitled ‘‘Tank Vessel
Response Plans for Hazardous
Substances’’ (64 FR 13734). In the
NPRM, we proposed regulations that
would require response plans for certain
tank vessels operating on the navigable
waters of the United States. The Coast
Guard received feedback from
concerned citizens, commercial entities,
and trade associations regarding the
proposed rulemaking. These comments
were made available in the docket.
Since then, further analysis by the Coast
Guard and the Chemical Transportation
Advisory Committee (CTAC) has shown
that implementation of the proposed
rules as structured in the 1999 NPRM
would not significantly increase
response effectiveness at this time.
CTAC also identified many areas in
which the NPRM may overlap with
existing local, state, and international
regulatory schemes as well as current
industry practice. The International
Maritime Organization’s Shipboard
Marine Pollution Emergency Plan
already requires all foreign flagged
vessels and U.S. vessels on international
routes carrying noxious liquid substance
cargos, to develop and implement spill
response plans. U.S. flagged vessels and
foreign flag vessels calling on ports or
places in the U.S. and carrying oil in
bulk as cargo or using oil as fuel for
main propulsion, must comply with the
Coast Guard’s Vessel Response Plan
requirements.3 Although these
requirements address planning for oil
spill response, many of these practices
may also be applied to hazardous
substance responses. Vessels also must
comply with numerous state response
planning requirements when operating
in state waters. The Coast Guard is
concerned the proposed rules may
create redundancy with some existing
rules and be unnecessary due to
industry’s increased awareness and
readiness since OPA 90 was passed.
Between the above-mentioned
3 33
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
CFR part 155, subpart D.
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
regulations already in place for oil spill
response, industry initiatives such as
the American Chemistry Council’s
Responsible Care and the American
Waterways Operators’ Responsible
Carrier programs, and the sustainability
policies of individual companies, CTAC
was unable to identify large gaps in
hazardous substance spill response
planning for vessels that would be
improved by the 1999 proposed
rulemaking.
III. Withdrawal
The Coast Guard is withdrawing its
proposed rulemaking in order to better
analyze the current spill response
capabilities of the chemical industry
and gaps in the current regulatory
regime before conducting any further
rulemaking on hazardous substance
response plans for tank vessels. While
the Coast Guard remains committed to
fulfilling its OPA 90 mandate, we
believe the proposed rules are no longer
appropriate in their 1999 form.
The Coast Guard has determined that
withdrawing the proposed rule is
appropriate based on findings that the
1999 proposed rules are no longer
applicable to the current state of spill
response in the chemical industry.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard is
withdrawing the ‘‘Tank Vessel Response
Plans for Hazardous Substances’’
proposed rulemaking published March
22, 1999 (64 FR 13734).
IV. Executive Order 13771
Pmangrum on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
The withdrawal of the NPRM
qualifies as a deregulatory action under
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs), which directs agencies to reduce
regulation and control regulatory costs
and provides that ‘‘for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior
regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations
be prudently managed and controlled
through a budgeting process.’’ See the
OMB Memorandum titled ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771,
Titled ‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (April 5,
2017).
Dated: February 4, 2019.
Anthony J. Vogt,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant
Commandant for Response Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–01593 Filed 2–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2017–0558; FRL–9988–27–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plan, Louisiana;
Attainment Demonstration for the St.
Bernard Parish 2010 SO2 Primary
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Nonattainment Area; Supplemental
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
In this supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is supplementing our proposed approval
document, concerning the 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide (SO2) Primary National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
Nonattainment Area State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for
St. Bernard Parish. The EPA is also
reopening the public comment period.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before March 11, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2017–0558, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact Mr. Robert Imhoff, (214) 665–
7262, imhoff.robert@epa.gov. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2801
at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Imhoff, (214) 665–7262;
imhoff.robert@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Mr. Robert Imhoff.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
I. Background
On April 19, 2018, we published a
proposed rulemaking action to approve
the 2010 SO2 Primary NAAQS
Nonattainment Area SIP revision for St.
Bernard Parish, submitted by the State
of Louisiana on November 9, 2017 and
first supplemented on February 8,
2018.1 The April 19, 2018 action
proposed approval of the following CAA
SIP elements: The attainment
demonstration for the SO2 NAAQS and
enforceable emissions limits, which
included an Agreed Order on Consent
(AOC) dated February 2, 2018 for the
Rain CII Carbon, LLC. (Rain) facility; the
reasonable further progress (RFP) plan;
the reasonably available control
measures (RACM) and reasonably
available control technology (RACT)
demonstration; the emission
inventories; and the contingency
measures. We also proposed to find that
the State had demonstrated that its
current Nonattainment New Source
Review (NNSR) program covered the
2010 SO2 NAAQS; therefore, no revision
to the SIP was required for the NNSR
element.
Comments on the proposal were
required to be received by May 21, 2018.
We received timely comments on the
proposal, and as stated further below,
we will address all comments received
on the original proposal and on this
supplemental action in our final action.2
II. Additional Information Submitted
by Louisiana
After the close of the public comment
period to the April 19, 2018 proposal,
the Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality (LDEQ)
submitted additional information to
1 83
FR 17349.
our detailed discussion below that involves
an evaluation of the supplemental information
submitted by the LDEQ to EPA, partly in response
to a public comment received on the original
Federal Register action at 83 FR 17349, April 19,
2018 proposal.
2 See
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2800-2801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01593]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 155
[Docket Number USCG-1998-4354]
RIN 1625-AA13 and 2115-AE88
Tank Vessel Response Plans for Hazardous Substances
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ``Tank Vessel Response Plans for Hazardous
Substances'' that we published on March 22, 1999. The Coast Guard is
withdrawing this rulemaking based on findings that the proposed rules
are no longer appropriate to the current state of spill response in the
chemical industry.
DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking published March 22, 1999, at
64 FR 13734, is withdrawn as of February 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available by
searching docket number USCG-1998-4354 using the Federal portal at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of withdrawal, call or email Mr. Christopher Friese, Commercial
Vessel Safety Specialist, Office of Marine Environmental Response
Policy (CG-MER-1), Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1227.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
OPA 90 Oil Pollution Act of 1990
CTAC Chemical Transportation Advisory Committee
II. Background
The Clean Water Act,\1\ as amended by section 4202(a)(6) of the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90),\2\ requires owners or operators of tank
vessels, offshore facilities, and onshore facilities to prepare
response plans to mitigate spills of both oils and hazardous
substances. These plans must address measures to respond, to the
maximum extent practicable, to a worst-case discharge or a substantial
threat of such a discharge, of oil or a hazardous substance into or on
navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, or the exclusive economic zone
of the United States. The primary purpose of requiring response plans
is to minimize the impact of a discharge of oil or hazardous substances
into the navigable waters of the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 33 U.S.C. 1321(j)(5).
\2\ Public Law 101-380, 104 Stat. 484.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 3, 1996, we published an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking soliciting public input on regulations concerning response
plans for certain tank vessels and marine transportation-related
facilities (61 FR 20083), and subsequently held two public meetings on
the subject that were announced in the Federal Register (61 FR 34775).
On March 22, 1999, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
in the Federal Register entitled ``Tank Vessel Response Plans for
Hazardous Substances'' (64 FR 13734). In the NPRM, we proposed
regulations that would require response plans for certain tank vessels
operating on the navigable waters of the United States. The Coast Guard
received feedback from concerned citizens, commercial entities, and
trade associations regarding the proposed rulemaking. These comments
were made available in the docket. Since then, further analysis by the
Coast Guard and the Chemical Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC)
has shown that implementation of the proposed rules as structured in
the 1999 NPRM would not significantly increase response effectiveness
at this time.
CTAC also identified many areas in which the NPRM may overlap with
existing local, state, and international regulatory schemes as well as
current industry practice. The International Maritime Organization's
Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plan already requires all foreign
flagged vessels and U.S. vessels on international routes carrying
noxious liquid substance cargos, to develop and implement spill
response plans. U.S. flagged vessels and foreign flag vessels calling
on ports or places in the U.S. and carrying oil in bulk as cargo or
using oil as fuel for main propulsion, must comply with the Coast
Guard's Vessel Response Plan requirements.\3\ Although these
requirements address planning for oil spill response, many of these
practices may also be applied to hazardous substance responses. Vessels
also must comply with numerous state response planning requirements
when operating in state waters. The Coast Guard is concerned the
proposed rules may create redundancy with some existing rules and be
unnecessary due to industry's increased awareness and readiness since
OPA 90 was passed. Between the above-mentioned
[[Page 2801]]
regulations already in place for oil spill response, industry
initiatives such as the American Chemistry Council's Responsible Care
and the American Waterways Operators' Responsible Carrier programs, and
the sustainability policies of individual companies, CTAC was unable to
identify large gaps in hazardous substance spill response planning for
vessels that would be improved by the 1999 proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 33 CFR part 155, subpart D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Withdrawal
The Coast Guard is withdrawing its proposed rulemaking in order to
better analyze the current spill response capabilities of the chemical
industry and gaps in the current regulatory regime before conducting
any further rulemaking on hazardous substance response plans for tank
vessels. While the Coast Guard remains committed to fulfilling its OPA
90 mandate, we believe the proposed rules are no longer appropriate in
their 1999 form.
The Coast Guard has determined that withdrawing the proposed rule
is appropriate based on findings that the 1999 proposed rules are no
longer applicable to the current state of spill response in the
chemical industry. Accordingly, the Coast Guard is withdrawing the
``Tank Vessel Response Plans for Hazardous Substances'' proposed
rulemaking published March 22, 1999 (64 FR 13734).
IV. Executive Order 13771
The withdrawal of the NPRM qualifies as a deregulatory action under
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs), which directs agencies to reduce regulation and control
regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and
controlled through a budgeting process.'' See the OMB Memorandum titled
``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled `Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017).
Dated: February 4, 2019.
Anthony J. Vogt,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Response
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-01593 Filed 2-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P