Pilot Project Program Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act; Program Announcement, 2879-2883 [2019-01561]
Download as PDF
2879
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Notices
presented in a standardized order with
minimum standards for type size and
other graphical features. Therefore, OTC
sunscreen products already on the
market at that time incurred a one-time
burden to comply with the requirements
in § 201.66(c) and (d). In the 60-day
notice, the burden was estimated as
43,200 hours for existing sunscreen
SKUs and 720 hours for new sunscreen
SKUs.
The compliance dates for the 2011
sunscreen final rule that lifted the delay
of the § 201.66 labeling implementation
data for OTC sunscreen products were
December 17, 2012, for sunscreen
products with annual sales of $25,000 or
more and December 17, 2013, for
sunscreen products with annual sales of
less than $25,000, respectively, when
we published the 2012 extension date
notice. All currently marketed
sunscreen products are, therefore,
already required to comply with the
Drug Facts labeling requirements in
§ 201.66 and will incur no further
burden in the 1999 Drug Facts labeling
final rule. However, new OTC sunscreen
drug products will be subject to a onetime burden to comply with Drug Facts
labeling requirements in § 201.66. In the
2011 60-day notice, we estimated that as
many as 60 new product SKUs marketed
each year must comply with Drug Facts
regulations. We estimated that these 60
SKUs would be marketed by 30
manufacturers, which will spend
approximately 12 hours on each label
based on the most recent estimate used
for other OTC drug products to comply
with the 1999 Drug Facts labeling final
rule, including public comments
received on this estimate in 2010 that
addressed sunscreens. This is equal to
720 hours annually (60 SKUs, 12 hours
per SKU). We stated that we do not
expect any OTC sunscreens to apply for
exemptions or deferrals of the Drug
Facts regulations in § 201.66(e).
However, we considered this in 2013
and estimated the burden for an
exemption or deferral by considering
the number of exemptions or deferrals
we have received since publication of
the 1999 Drug Facts labeling final rule
(one response) and estimating that a
request for deferral or exemption would
require 24 hours to complete.
Multiplying the annual frequency of
response (0.125) by the number of hours
per response (24) gives a total response
time for requesting an exemption or
deferral equal to 3 hours.
In the Federal Register of August 22,
2018 (83 FR 42509), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received.
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN
[New sunscreens] 1
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Activity
Conduct SPF testing in accordance
§ 201.327(i) for new sunscreens.
Create PDP labeling in accordance
§ 201.327(a)(1) for new sunscreen SKUs.
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total annual
disclosures
Total hours
with
20
1.95
39
24 ...............................
936
with
20
3
60
0.5 (30 minutes) .........
30
Total ..................................................................
........................
........................
........................
....................................
966
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN
[Drug facts labeling] 1
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total annual
disclosures
Total hours
Format labeling in accordance with § 201.66(c)
and (d) for new sunscreen SKUs.
Request for Drug Facts exemption or deferral
§ 201.66(e).
20
3
60 ...............................
12
720
1
0.125
0.125 (7 minutes) .......
24
3
Total ..................................................................
........................
........................
....................................
........................
723
1 There
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Activity
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
We note that these estimates may be
adjusted in the future as the result of a
detailed analysis of sunscreen market
data conducted by FDA as part of the
development of an upcoming proposed
rule on OTC sunscreen products (RIN
0910–AA01). FDA intends to either or
both amend this information collection
or seek approval of additional
information collections, as appropriate,
concurrent with publication of the
proposed rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
Dated: February 4, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–01529 Filed 2–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0407]
Pilot Project Program Under the Drug
Supply Chain Security Act; Program
Announcement
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
2880
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Notices
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the start of the Pilot Project
Program Under the Drug Supply Chain
Security Act (DSCSA Pilot Project
Program). The DSCSA Pilot Project
Program is intended to assist FDA and
members of the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain in the
development of the electronic,
interoperable system that will identify
and trace certain prescription drugs as
they are distributed within the United
States. Under this program, FDA will
work with stakeholders to establish one
or more pilot projects to explore and
evaluate methods to enhance the safety
and security of the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain. Participation
in the DSCSA Pilot Project Program is
voluntary and will be open to
pharmaceutical distribution supply
chain members to apply to the program.
FDA will ensure that participation
reflects the diversity of the supply
chain, including large and small entities
from all industry sectors. This notice
establishes the DSCSA Pilot Project
Program and includes instructions for
submitting a request to participate and
expectations for program participants.
DATES: FDA will be accepting
applications for participation in the
DSCSA Pilot Project Program beginning
February 8, 2019 and continuing
through March 11, 2019. The duration
of the DSCSA Pilot Project Program will
depend on the pilot project(s) accepted
into the program and when the projects
are completed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Bellingham, Office of
Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
301–796–3130, DSCSAPilotProjects@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
I. Background
On November 27, 2013, the Drug
Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA)
(Title II of Pub. L. 113–54) was signed
into law. The DSCSA outlines critical
steps to build an electronic,
interoperable system by November 27,
2023, that will identify and trace certain
prescription drugs as they are
distributed within the United States.
Section 202 of the DSCSA added
sections 581 and 582 to the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 360eee and 360eee–1,
respectively). Under section 582(j) of the
FD&C Act, FDA is required to establish
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
one or more pilot projects, in
coordination with authorized
manufacturers, repackagers, wholesale
distributors, and dispensers, to explore
and evaluate methods to enhance the
safety and security of the
pharmaceutical distribution supply
chain.
FDA is establishing the DSCSA Pilot
Project Program to implement section
582(j) of the FD&C Act. This program is
intended to assist FDA and members of
the pharmaceutical distribution supply
chain in the development of the
interoperable electronic system to be
established by 2023. The 2023 system
has the potential to reduce diversion of
drugs distributed domestically as well
as help deter counterfeit drugs from
entering the supply chain. The pilot
program will be designed to explore
issues related to utilizing the product
identifier for product tracing, improving
the technical capabilities of the supply
chain, identifying the system attributes
that are necessary to implement the
requirements established under the
DSCSA, and any other issues identified
by FDA (see section 582(j)(2)(B) of the
FD&C Act).
Particular program goals include: (1)
Identifying the system attributes needed
to implement the requirements of
section 582 of the FD&C Act,
particularly the requirement to utilize a
product identifier for product tracing
and verification purposes and (2)
assessing the ability of supply chain
members to satisfy the requirements of
section 582 of the FD&C Act; identify,
manage, and prevent the distribution of
suspect and illegitimate products as
defined in section 581(21) and 581(8) of
the FD&C Act, respectively, and
exchange product tracing information
across the pharmaceutical distribution
supply chain in an electronic and
interoperable manner. FDA plans to
coordinate with stakeholders to ensure
that pilot projects reflect the diversity of
the pharmaceutical distribution supply
chain, including large and small entities
from all industry sectors. The DSCSA
Pilot Project Program is intended to help
identify and evaluate the most efficient
processes and/or systems to
operationalize supply chain security
requirements.
II. The DSCSA Pilot Project Program
FDA is seeking pilot project
participants from the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain (e.g.,
authorized manufacturers, repackagers,
wholesale distributors, and dispensers)
and other stakeholders. FDA expects
potential participants to propose the
design and execution of their pilot
project in their submission to FDA;
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
however, FDA intends to meet with
selected pilot project participants to
ensure that the learnings from the pilot
project(s) will be complementary in
informing all stakeholders in the
development of the electronic,
interoperable system that will go into
effect in 2023. FDA encourages potential
participants to focus their proposed
pilot project(s) on the DSCSA
requirements related to the
interoperable, electronic tracing of
products at the package level.
Specifically, the pilot project(s) should
focus on the enhanced requirements for
package-level tracing and verification
that go into effect in 2023. Such pilot
projects will likely be more useful than
pilot projects dedicated to lot-level
tracing. If there is an adequate number
of pilot project submissions, FDA may
establish more than one pilot project to
accomplish the goals of the DSCSA Pilot
Project Program.
A. Products Eligibility
Pilot projects should focus on
applicable requirements to any
prescription drug that is a ‘‘product’’
within the meaning of section 581(13) of
the FD&C Act. FDA anticipates that
packages and homogenous cases of
product that are part of a pilot project
will generally bear a ‘‘product
identifier’’ as described in sections
581(14) and 582(a)(9) of the FD&C Act.
FDA may also consider proposed pilot
projects involving product that may be
subject to a waiver, exception or
exemption of certain DSCSA
requirements, products that are
grandfathered, in addition to products
that are outside the scope of section
581(13) of the FD&C Act (e.g., over-thecounter medicines) if such project(s)
could further the objectives of the
DSCSA Pilot Project Program.
B. Potential Issues To Examine and
Evaluation Methods To Use in Pilot
Projects
On April 5–6, 2016, FDA held a
public workshop entitled ‘‘Proposed
Pilot Project(s) Under the Drug Supply
Chain Security Act (DSCSA).’’ This
public workshop provided a forum for
members of the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain to discuss the
design objectives of pilot projects
established by FDA under section 582(j)
of the FD&C Act. Based on the
information gathered at that workshop
and from the comments submitted to the
public docket for the workshop (Docket
No. FDA–2016–N–0407), FDA identified
several potential issues to examine, and
evaluation methods to use, in pilot
projects established under the DSCSA
Pilot Project Program. These potential
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Notices
issues and evaluation methods are
summarized in table 1. This table is
intended only to assist in the design of
potential pilot projects; it does not
represent FDA’s views or policies
regarding the issues described in the
table. For ease of reference, the potential
issues to examine and evaluation
2881
methods have been grouped by focus
areas for the pilot projects.
TABLE 1—POTENTIAL ISSUES TO EXAMINE AND EVALUATION METHODS TO USE IN PILOT PROJECTS
Pilot project focus area
Potential issues to examine
Potential evaluation methods
Product Identifier ..................
• Processes related to the requirement for manufacturers to affix or imprint a product identifier to each
package and homogenous case of product intended
to be introduced in a transaction into commerce.
• Methods used to issue and manage serial numbers
(e.g., including a contract manufacturer’s role if applicable or how a repackager associates its product
identifier with the product identifier assigned by the
original manufacturer).
• Different representations for the product identifier
(e.g., different formats of the National Drug Code or
serial number).
• Readability of a barcode either printed or affixed to
product, including impact of environmental and
human factors.
• Application of linear barcode and 2D barcode on
product.
• Distinguishing which barcode to read/use ..................
• Process and technical challenges due to a variety of
potential solutions (e.g., type of database used and
system architecture for exchanging information
among trading partners).
• Maintaining the integrity of information contained in
the barcode of serialized product throughout the distribution supply chain (e.g., a trading partner goes
out of business or one acquires another business).
• Different methods for exchanging information (e.g.,
the use of Electronic Data Interchange, Electronic
Product Code Information Services, and other solutions separately).
• Impacts of different representations of the product
identifier on systems or processes:
—Number of errors.
—Time to process.
—Time to reconcile differences.
Barcodes ..............................
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Interoperability ......................
Data/Database/System
Issues.
• Data quality from beginning to end of the product
lifecycle and vice versa.
• System performance when full or partially loaded
with data.
• Data format or processes for data transfer: ................
—Use of technical standards for defining data attributes to enable interoperable transfers.
—Methods to handle the ‘‘master data’’ (productspecific data) and transaction data separately to
minimize ‘‘master data’’ redundancy.
• Integration into individual/company data systems ......
• Control and access to data by trading partners, FDA,
or other federal or state officials (data governance).
• Ability of the system to record product status (e.g., to
indicate expired, illegitimate, in error, quarantined) at
all packaging levels.
Aggregation/Disaggregation
• Multiple levels of adoption of inference, by different
trading partners. Impact of inference gaps, changes
or errors in data, particularly downstream when
searching or examining the data; how can errors be
corrected.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Barcode read error rates:
—Number of items unnecessarily quarantined or
held up.
—Time and resource impacts.
• For both decentralized and centralized models, time
implications:
—To investigate suspect and illegitimate products.
—For notifications required within the statutory
timelines.
—Related to scaling up from pilot to full production.
• Product tracing information (across multiple partners):
—Capability to retrieve the information.
—Accuracy of the information (within and between
systems).
• Security and access:
—Evaluate and document access levels for trading
partners.
• System Performance and Effectiveness:
—Time to access and use product tracing information once that data is received into a system.
—Quality of product tracing information.
—Number of breaches to system.
—Number of attempts to breach the system that
were prevented or minimized.
• Data and product flow.
—Number of unsuccessful attempts to access data
and operational impacts.
—Number of system interactions within one, and
amongst multiple, trading partners.
—Time and resource changes on operations when
data and product not moving at same time (e.g.,
product arrives before data arrives).
—Time for location/ownership/status changes to be
reflected in the system.
—Time of product flow delays and associated
costs due to system or data problems.
• Number of system and product interactions within
one, and amongst multiple, trading partners.
• Time required to conduct aggregate/disaggregate operations and transactions.
• Accuracy of aggregation data (measure error
counts).
• Time to gather aggregation/disaggregation data for
investigations and notifications.
• Time to resolve errors in data.
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
2882
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
TABLE 1—POTENTIAL ISSUES TO EXAMINE AND EVALUATION METHODS TO USE IN PILOT PROJECTS—Continued
Pilot project focus area
Potential issues to examine
Potential evaluation methods
Verification/Notification .........
• Process for investigation of suspect or illegitimate
product, including any communication or coordination:.
—Making and responding to verification requests ..
—Making, responding to, and termination of notifications.
—Responding to requests for information ...............
—Testing boundaries of the system ........................
Exception Handling/Errors/
Inconsistencies.
• Identify ‘honest errors’ (e.g., over/under shipments,
clerical errors, or aggregation errors).
• Correcting ‘honest errors’ ............................................
Special Scenarios ................
• Situations when data and product do not move together.
• Situations when serialized product are sold and distributed along with non-serialized product.
• Response times: Current vs. future process.
• Time needed to obtain product tracing information to
respond to a request for verification.
• Time needed to make, respond to, or terminate a notification.
• Time to gather product tracing information to support
an investigation for a suspect or illegitimate product,
or a recall.
• Percentage of items that are successfully verified vs.
those that were targeted for verification.
• Number of connections/queries needed to gather
product tracing information in response to a
verification or notification request.
• Percent of errors detected: Compare exceptions introduced vs. exceptions detected:
—Identify the first step in the process where an
error is detected.
• Number of new or changed processes needed to accomplish DSCSA goals:
—Time and resource impacts.
• ‘Honest Errors’:
—Number of items unnecessarily quarantined and
held up.
—Time required to detect and correct errors.
—Impact on trading partners to correct errors.
• Barcode read error rates:
—Number of items unnecessarily quarantined or
held up.
—Time and resource impacts.
• Error rates for special processes:
—Number of items unnecessarily quarantined or
held up.
—Time and resource impacts.
• Accuracy of linkage between original manufacturer
product identifier and repackager-issued product
identifier.
In addition to the information in table
1, workshop participants and comments
submitted to the public docket
recommended factors that FDA should
take into consideration when
establishing pilot projects. The
recommended factors include the extent
to which the pilot projects:
• Represent the mix of products and
levels of packaging in the supply
chain
• Include a diverse set of supply chain
stakeholders (types and sizes) and
transaction types
• Use adaptive design to make the pilot
projects more efficient.
• Target known weaknesses in the
supply chain
• Can be completed in such a time
frame to provide useful information
for trading partners
• Evaluate human factors that could
present implementation challenges
• Simulate illegitimate products/
transactions to test a process or
system
• Document costs to implement, use,
and maintain piloted solutions
Although the Agency intends to take
these factors into consideration when
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
establishing pilot projects, FDA also
recognizes that a single pilot project is
unlikely to satisfy every factor.
Accordingly, requests to establish a
pilot project need not satisfy all the
factors listed in this document.
C. Instructions for Submitting a Request
To Participate in the DSCSA Pilot
Project Program
Stakeholders interested in
participating in the DSCSA Pilot Project
Program may submit a request to
participate by email to
DSCSAPilotProjects@fda.hhs.gov. For a
group of entities that partner to
participate in a pilot project, only one
submission and one point-of-contact for
the proposed pilot project should be
provided in the request to participate.
Requests to participate may also
consider other ideas for a pilot project
that are not included in this notice.
D. Submission Content for Requesting
To Participate in the DSCSA Pilot
Project Program
The following information should be
included in the request:
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Contact information for the submitter
or point of contact, if different from
the submitter (name, mailing address,
phone number, email address)
• Names of all partnering entities that
would participate in the pilot project
(name of company and name of
company representative)
• Type(s) of each partnering entity
participating in the pilot project (e.g.,
manufacturer, repackagers, wholesale
distributor, dispenser, third-party
logistics provider, solution provider,
trade association, etc.); Partnering
entities may include authorized
trading partners or other supply chain
stakeholders
• Number of employees for each
partnering entity to reflect company
size
• Proposed start and finish dates of the
pilot project
• Commitment to start the pilot project
within 4 months of receiving a letter
of acceptance from FDA
• Product(s) that will be used in the
pilot project
• Location(s) where pilot project will be
performed (facility address)
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Notices
• Description of the proposed pilot
project, including, but not limited to,
the goals, objectives, processes that
will be studied, and evaluation
methods
E. Initiation and Duration of Pilot
Projects
The selected participants should be
ready to start their pilot project within
4 months of receiving a letter of
acceptance from FDA into the program.
The duration of a pilot project should
not exceed 6 months. FDA may consider
a pilot project with a later start date or
longer duration depending on the
proposed goal(s) and objective(s). Each
pilot project is expected to be completed
within the proposed duration time
period. This time period does not
include an additional 30 days for
completion of a final report (see Section
II.G. Reports).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
F. Participation in Pilot Projects
Each participant that is selected into
the program will be responsible for
conducting its pilot project. A group of
entities (e.g., members of the
pharmaceutical distribution supply
chain or other stakeholders, including
trade associations) that partners to
conduct a pilot project will be
considered a single participant for
purposes of the DSCSA Pilot Project
Program. The participant will be
responsible for the funding and
resources necessary to conduct the pilot
project, and for determining each
partner’s role and responsibility in its
pilot project.
Prior to launch of a pilot project, FDA
intends to hold a design strategy
meeting with the selected pilot
participant(s) to review the goal(s) and
objective(s)s for the pilot project and
discuss the project plans and other
pertinent details. FDA also expects pilot
project participants to submit reports on
the progress of their pilot projects to
FDA (see Section II.G. Reports).
Participants should evaluate their pilot
projects using the evaluation methods
they identified during the pilot project
design process.
G. Reports
Each pilot project is expected to be
completed within the proposed duration
time period, and FDA asks that all
participants submit periodic progress
reports to FDA while the pilot project is
being conducted, in addition to
submitting a final report after
completing the pilot project. These
reports will provide insight into the
systems and process needed to comply
with certain DSCSA requirements for
enhanced drug distribution security.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
1. Progress Report(s)
Each pilot project program participant
is expected to provide reports on the
progress of its pilot project to FDA. The
progress reports are intended to capture
the ongoing work during the pilot
project, including but not limited to,
status or results, changes, challenges,
and/or lessons learned. FDA will work
with participants to develop an
appropriate schedule for the submission
of progress reports based on the design
and duration of the pilot project.
Because the duration of a pilot project
should not exceed 6 months, the
frequency of progress reports will vary
based on the length of the individual
pilot project. Pilot projects of relatively
shorter duration may result in shorter
time intervals between progress reports.
For example, FDA may ask for monthly
progress reports for a 6-month pilot
project, however for a 1-month pilot
project, FDA may ask for weekly
progress reports.
2. Final Report
Within 30 to 45 business days of
completing a pilot project, each
participant is expected to provide a final
report to FDA that captures the
description, objectives, methods,
evaluation, costs and key findings, and
lessons learned from the project. Timely
completion of pilot projects and the
final report will support FDA’s DSCSA
implementation, including the statutory
requirements under section 582(j) of the
FD&C Act to consider information from
pilot projects in the development of
guidances for unit-level tracing and
standards for the interoperable data
exchange in section 582(h)(3) and (4) of
the FD&C Act. FDA may also request
that the participants meet with the
Agency upon the completion of their
pilot project or the final report.
H. Final DSCSA Pilot Project Program
Report
To ensure that all supply chain
members benefit from the information
generated by the DSCSA Pilot Project
Program, FDA intends to make the
following information about each pilot
project of the program available to the
public in a final program report: (1) The
names and industry sector(s) of the pilot
project participant(s); (2) the pilot
project’s objectives and evaluation
methods; (3) the duration of the pilot
project; and (4) the key findings and
lessons learned from the pilot project.
FDA intends to post the information
related to the DSCSA Pilot Project
Program and the final program report on
FDA’s website.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2883
I. Recordkeeping
Any records generated by a
participant while conducting a pilot
project should be maintained in
accordance with the participant’s
normal recordkeeping practices. For
pilot projects that involve partnering
entities, the partnering entities should
decide who is responsible for the
records generated in the course of
conducting the pilot project. FDA
recommends that participants maintain
the progress reports and final report for
its pilot project for at least 1 year after
completion of the pilot project.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This notice contains information
collection provisions that are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collection of information in
this notice was approved under OMB
control number 0910–0859.
Dated: February 4, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–01561 Filed 2–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Request for Information (RFI):
Improving Efficiency, Effectiveness,
Coordination, and Accountability of
HIV and Viral Hepatitis Prevention,
Care, and Treatment Programs
Office of HIV/AIDS and
Infectious Disease Policy, Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of
the Secretary, Department of Health and
Human Services.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Both the National HIV/AIDS
Strategy (NHAS) and the National Viral
Hepatitis Action Plan (NVHAP) expire
in 2020. The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) Office of HIV/
AIDS and Infectious Disease Policy
(OHAIDP), in collaboration with federal
partners, is leading development of the
next iterations of these two separate and
distinct national strategies. To help
inform the next iterations of the NHAS
and NVHAP, HHS seeks input from
external stakeholders for improving
efficiency, effectiveness, coordination,
and accountability of HIV and viral
hepatitis prevention, care, treatment,
and cure policies, services, and
programs.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2879-2883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01561]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0407]
Pilot Project Program Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act;
Program Announcement
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
[[Page 2880]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the start of the Pilot Project Program Under the Drug Supply Chain
Security Act (DSCSA Pilot Project Program). The DSCSA Pilot Project
Program is intended to assist FDA and members of the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain in the development of the electronic,
interoperable system that will identify and trace certain prescription
drugs as they are distributed within the United States. Under this
program, FDA will work with stakeholders to establish one or more pilot
projects to explore and evaluate methods to enhance the safety and
security of the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain. Participation
in the DSCSA Pilot Project Program is voluntary and will be open to
pharmaceutical distribution supply chain members to apply to the
program. FDA will ensure that participation reflects the diversity of
the supply chain, including large and small entities from all industry
sectors. This notice establishes the DSCSA Pilot Project Program and
includes instructions for submitting a request to participate and
expectations for program participants.
DATES: FDA will be accepting applications for participation in the
DSCSA Pilot Project Program beginning February 8, 2019 and continuing
through March 11, 2019. The duration of the DSCSA Pilot Project Program
will depend on the pilot project(s) accepted into the program and when
the projects are completed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Bellingham, Office of
Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
301-796-3130, DSCSAPilotProjects@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 27, 2013, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA)
(Title II of Pub. L. 113-54) was signed into law. The DSCSA outlines
critical steps to build an electronic, interoperable system by November
27, 2023, that will identify and trace certain prescription drugs as
they are distributed within the United States. Section 202 of the DSCSA
added sections 581 and 582 to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360eee and 360eee-1, respectively). Under section
582(j) of the FD&C Act, FDA is required to establish one or more pilot
projects, in coordination with authorized manufacturers, repackagers,
wholesale distributors, and dispensers, to explore and evaluate methods
to enhance the safety and security of the pharmaceutical distribution
supply chain.
FDA is establishing the DSCSA Pilot Project Program to implement
section 582(j) of the FD&C Act. This program is intended to assist FDA
and members of the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain in the
development of the interoperable electronic system to be established by
2023. The 2023 system has the potential to reduce diversion of drugs
distributed domestically as well as help deter counterfeit drugs from
entering the supply chain. The pilot program will be designed to
explore issues related to utilizing the product identifier for product
tracing, improving the technical capabilities of the supply chain,
identifying the system attributes that are necessary to implement the
requirements established under the DSCSA, and any other issues
identified by FDA (see section 582(j)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Particular program goals include: (1) Identifying the system
attributes needed to implement the requirements of section 582 of the
FD&C Act, particularly the requirement to utilize a product identifier
for product tracing and verification purposes and (2) assessing the
ability of supply chain members to satisfy the requirements of section
582 of the FD&C Act; identify, manage, and prevent the distribution of
suspect and illegitimate products as defined in section 581(21) and
581(8) of the FD&C Act, respectively, and exchange product tracing
information across the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain in an
electronic and interoperable manner. FDA plans to coordinate with
stakeholders to ensure that pilot projects reflect the diversity of the
pharmaceutical distribution supply chain, including large and small
entities from all industry sectors. The DSCSA Pilot Project Program is
intended to help identify and evaluate the most efficient processes
and/or systems to operationalize supply chain security requirements.
II. The DSCSA Pilot Project Program
FDA is seeking pilot project participants from the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain (e.g., authorized manufacturers, repackagers,
wholesale distributors, and dispensers) and other stakeholders. FDA
expects potential participants to propose the design and execution of
their pilot project in their submission to FDA; however, FDA intends to
meet with selected pilot project participants to ensure that the
learnings from the pilot project(s) will be complementary in informing
all stakeholders in the development of the electronic, interoperable
system that will go into effect in 2023. FDA encourages potential
participants to focus their proposed pilot project(s) on the DSCSA
requirements related to the interoperable, electronic tracing of
products at the package level. Specifically, the pilot project(s)
should focus on the enhanced requirements for package-level tracing and
verification that go into effect in 2023. Such pilot projects will
likely be more useful than pilot projects dedicated to lot-level
tracing. If there is an adequate number of pilot project submissions,
FDA may establish more than one pilot project to accomplish the goals
of the DSCSA Pilot Project Program.
A. Products Eligibility
Pilot projects should focus on applicable requirements to any
prescription drug that is a ``product'' within the meaning of section
581(13) of the FD&C Act. FDA anticipates that packages and homogenous
cases of product that are part of a pilot project will generally bear a
``product identifier'' as described in sections 581(14) and 582(a)(9)
of the FD&C Act. FDA may also consider proposed pilot projects
involving product that may be subject to a waiver, exception or
exemption of certain DSCSA requirements, products that are
grandfathered, in addition to products that are outside the scope of
section 581(13) of the FD&C Act (e.g., over-the-counter medicines) if
such project(s) could further the objectives of the DSCSA Pilot Project
Program.
B. Potential Issues To Examine and Evaluation Methods To Use in Pilot
Projects
On April 5-6, 2016, FDA held a public workshop entitled ``Proposed
Pilot Project(s) Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA).''
This public workshop provided a forum for members of the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain to discuss the design objectives of pilot
projects established by FDA under section 582(j) of the FD&C Act. Based
on the information gathered at that workshop and from the comments
submitted to the public docket for the workshop (Docket No. FDA-2016-N-
0407), FDA identified several potential issues to examine, and
evaluation methods to use, in pilot projects established under the
DSCSA Pilot Project Program. These potential
[[Page 2881]]
issues and evaluation methods are summarized in table 1. This table is
intended only to assist in the design of potential pilot projects; it
does not represent FDA's views or policies regarding the issues
described in the table. For ease of reference, the potential issues to
examine and evaluation methods have been grouped by focus areas for the
pilot projects.
Table 1--Potential Issues To Examine and Evaluation Methods To Use in
Pilot Projects
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential issues to Potential evaluation
Pilot project focus area examine methods
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product Identifier.......... Processes Impacts of
related to the different
requirement for representations of
manufacturers to the product
affix or imprint a identifier on
product identifier systems or
to each package and processes:
homogenous case of --Number of errors.
product intended to --Time to process.
be introduced in a --Time to reconcile
transaction into differences.
commerce.
Methods
used to issue and
manage serial
numbers (e.g.,
including a
contract
manufacturer's role
if applicable or
how a repackager
associates its
product identifier
with the product
identifier assigned
by the original
manufacturer).
Different
representations for
the product
identifier (e.g.,
different formats
of the National
Drug Code or serial
number).
Barcodes.................... Readability Barcode
of a barcode either read error rates:
printed or affixed --Number of items
to product, unnecessarily
including impact of quarantined or held
environmental and up.
human factors. --Time and resource
Application impacts.
of linear barcode
and 2D barcode on
product.
Distinguishing
which barcode to
read/use.
Interoperability............ Process and For both
technical decentralized and
challenges due to a centralized models,
variety of time implications:
potential solutions --To investigate
(e.g., type of suspect and
database used and illegitimate
system architecture products.
for exchanging --For notifications
information among required within the
trading partners). statutory
Maintaining timelines.
the integrity of --Related to scaling
information up from pilot to
contained in the full production.
barcode of Product
serialized product tracing information
throughout the (across multiple
distribution supply partners):
chain (e.g., a --Capability to
trading partner retrieve the
goes out of information.
business or one --Accuracy of the
acquires another information (within
business). and between
Different systems).
methods for Security
exchanging and access:
information (e.g., --Evaluate and
the use of document access
Electronic Data levels for trading
Interchange, partners.
Electronic Product
Code Information
Services, and other
solutions
separately).
Data/Database/System Issues. Data System
quality from Performance and
beginning to end of Effectiveness:
the product --Time to access and
lifecycle and vice use product tracing
versa. information once
System that data is
performance when received into a
full or partially system.
loaded with data. --Quality of product
Data format tracing
or processes for information.
data transfer:. --Number of breaches
--Use of technical to system.
standards for --Number of attempts
defining data to breach the
attributes to system that were
enable prevented or
interoperable minimized.
transfers. Data and
--Methods to handle product flow.
the ``master data'' --Number of
(product-specific unsuccessful
data) and attempts to access
transaction data data and
separately to operational
minimize ``master impacts.
data'' redundancy. --Number of system
Integration interactions within
into individual/ one, and amongst
company data multiple, trading
systems. partners.
Control and --Time and resource
access to data by changes on
trading partners, operations when
FDA, or other data and product
federal or state not moving at same
officials (data time (e.g., product
governance). arrives before data
Ability of arrives).
the system to --Time for location/
record product ownership/status
status (e.g., to changes to be
indicate expired, reflected in the
illegitimate, in system.
error, quarantined) --Time of product
at all packaging flow delays and
levels. associated costs
due to system or
data problems.
Aggregation/Disaggregation.. Multiple Number of
levels of adoption system and product
of inference, by interactions within
different trading one, and amongst
partners. Impact of multiple, trading
inference gaps, partners.
changes or errors Time
in data, required to conduct
particularly aggregate/
downstream when disaggregate
searching or operations and
examining the data; transactions.
how can errors be Accuracy of
corrected. aggregation data
(measure error
counts).
Time to
gather aggregation/
disaggregation data
for investigations
and notifications.
Time to
resolve errors in
data.
[[Page 2882]]
Verification/Notification... Process for Response
investigation of times: Current vs.
suspect or future process.
illegitimate Time needed
product, including to obtain product
any communication tracing information
or coordination:. to respond to a
--Making and request for
responding to verification.
verification Time needed
requests. to make, respond
--Making, responding to, or terminate a
to, and termination notification.
of notifications. Time to
--Responding to gather product
requests for tracing information
information. to support an
--Testing boundaries investigation for a
of the system. suspect or
illegitimate
product, or a
recall.
Percentage
of items that are
successfully
verified vs. those
that were targeted
for verification.
Number of
connections/queries
needed to gather
product tracing
information in
response to a
verification or
notification
request.
Exception Handling/Errors/ Identify Percent of
Inconsistencies. `honest errors' errors detected:
(e.g., over/under Compare exceptions
shipments, clerical introduced vs.
errors, or exceptions
aggregation errors). detected:
Correcting --Identify the first
`honest errors'. step in the process
where an error is
detected.
Number of
new or changed
processes needed to
accomplish DSCSA
goals:
--Time and resource
impacts.
`Honest
Errors':
--Number of items
unnecessarily
quarantined and
held up.
--Time required to
detect and correct
errors.
--Impact on trading
partners to correct
errors.
Barcode
read error rates:
--Number of items
unnecessarily
quarantined or held
up.
--Time and resource
impacts.
Special Scenarios........... Situations Error rates
when data and for special
product do not move processes:
together. --Number of items
Situations unnecessarily
when serialized quarantined or held
product are sold up.
and distributed --Time and resource
along with non- impacts.
serialized product. Accuracy of
linkage between
original
manufacturer
product identifier
and repackager-
issued product
identifier.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the information in table 1, workshop participants
and comments submitted to the public docket recommended factors that
FDA should take into consideration when establishing pilot projects.
The recommended factors include the extent to which the pilot projects:
Represent the mix of products and levels of packaging in the
supply chain
Include a diverse set of supply chain stakeholders (types and
sizes) and transaction types
Use adaptive design to make the pilot projects more efficient.
Target known weaknesses in the supply chain
Can be completed in such a time frame to provide useful
information for trading partners
Evaluate human factors that could present implementation
challenges
Simulate illegitimate products/transactions to test a process
or system
Document costs to implement, use, and maintain piloted
solutions
Although the Agency intends to take these factors into
consideration when establishing pilot projects, FDA also recognizes
that a single pilot project is unlikely to satisfy every factor.
Accordingly, requests to establish a pilot project need not satisfy all
the factors listed in this document.
C. Instructions for Submitting a Request To Participate in the DSCSA
Pilot Project Program
Stakeholders interested in participating in the DSCSA Pilot Project
Program may submit a request to participate by email to
DSCSAPilotProjects@fda.hhs.gov. For a group of entities that partner to
participate in a pilot project, only one submission and one point-of-
contact for the proposed pilot project should be provided in the
request to participate. Requests to participate may also consider other
ideas for a pilot project that are not included in this notice.
D. Submission Content for Requesting To Participate in the DSCSA Pilot
Project Program
The following information should be included in the request:
Contact information for the submitter or point of contact, if
different from the submitter (name, mailing address, phone number,
email address)
Names of all partnering entities that would participate in the
pilot project (name of company and name of company representative)
Type(s) of each partnering entity participating in the pilot
project (e.g., manufacturer, repackagers, wholesale distributor,
dispenser, third-party logistics provider, solution provider, trade
association, etc.); Partnering entities may include authorized trading
partners or other supply chain stakeholders
Number of employees for each partnering entity to reflect
company size
Proposed start and finish dates of the pilot project
Commitment to start the pilot project within 4 months of
receiving a letter of acceptance from FDA
Product(s) that will be used in the pilot project
Location(s) where pilot project will be performed (facility
address)
[[Page 2883]]
Description of the proposed pilot project, including, but not
limited to, the goals, objectives, processes that will be studied, and
evaluation methods
E. Initiation and Duration of Pilot Projects
The selected participants should be ready to start their pilot
project within 4 months of receiving a letter of acceptance from FDA
into the program. The duration of a pilot project should not exceed 6
months. FDA may consider a pilot project with a later start date or
longer duration depending on the proposed goal(s) and objective(s).
Each pilot project is expected to be completed within the proposed
duration time period. This time period does not include an additional
30 days for completion of a final report (see Section II.G. Reports).
F. Participation in Pilot Projects
Each participant that is selected into the program will be
responsible for conducting its pilot project. A group of entities
(e.g., members of the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain or other
stakeholders, including trade associations) that partners to conduct a
pilot project will be considered a single participant for purposes of
the DSCSA Pilot Project Program. The participant will be responsible
for the funding and resources necessary to conduct the pilot project,
and for determining each partner's role and responsibility in its pilot
project.
Prior to launch of a pilot project, FDA intends to hold a design
strategy meeting with the selected pilot participant(s) to review the
goal(s) and objective(s)s for the pilot project and discuss the project
plans and other pertinent details. FDA also expects pilot project
participants to submit reports on the progress of their pilot projects
to FDA (see Section II.G. Reports). Participants should evaluate their
pilot projects using the evaluation methods they identified during the
pilot project design process.
G. Reports
Each pilot project is expected to be completed within the proposed
duration time period, and FDA asks that all participants submit
periodic progress reports to FDA while the pilot project is being
conducted, in addition to submitting a final report after completing
the pilot project. These reports will provide insight into the systems
and process needed to comply with certain DSCSA requirements for
enhanced drug distribution security.
1. Progress Report(s)
Each pilot project program participant is expected to provide
reports on the progress of its pilot project to FDA. The progress
reports are intended to capture the ongoing work during the pilot
project, including but not limited to, status or results, changes,
challenges, and/or lessons learned. FDA will work with participants to
develop an appropriate schedule for the submission of progress reports
based on the design and duration of the pilot project. Because the
duration of a pilot project should not exceed 6 months, the frequency
of progress reports will vary based on the length of the individual
pilot project. Pilot projects of relatively shorter duration may result
in shorter time intervals between progress reports. For example, FDA
may ask for monthly progress reports for a 6-month pilot project,
however for a 1-month pilot project, FDA may ask for weekly progress
reports.
2. Final Report
Within 30 to 45 business days of completing a pilot project, each
participant is expected to provide a final report to FDA that captures
the description, objectives, methods, evaluation, costs and key
findings, and lessons learned from the project. Timely completion of
pilot projects and the final report will support FDA's DSCSA
implementation, including the statutory requirements under section
582(j) of the FD&C Act to consider information from pilot projects in
the development of guidances for unit-level tracing and standards for
the interoperable data exchange in section 582(h)(3) and (4) of the
FD&C Act. FDA may also request that the participants meet with the
Agency upon the completion of their pilot project or the final report.
H. Final DSCSA Pilot Project Program Report
To ensure that all supply chain members benefit from the
information generated by the DSCSA Pilot Project Program, FDA intends
to make the following information about each pilot project of the
program available to the public in a final program report: (1) The
names and industry sector(s) of the pilot project participant(s); (2)
the pilot project's objectives and evaluation methods; (3) the duration
of the pilot project; and (4) the key findings and lessons learned from
the pilot project. FDA intends to post the information related to the
DSCSA Pilot Project Program and the final program report on FDA's
website.
I. Recordkeeping
Any records generated by a participant while conducting a pilot
project should be maintained in accordance with the participant's
normal recordkeeping practices. For pilot projects that involve
partnering entities, the partnering entities should decide who is
responsible for the records generated in the course of conducting the
pilot project. FDA recommends that participants maintain the progress
reports and final report for its pilot project for at least 1 year
after completion of the pilot project.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This notice contains information collection provisions that are
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collection of information in this notice was approved under OMB control
number 0910-0859.
Dated: February 4, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-01561 Filed 2-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P