Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes, 2796-2799 [2019-01527]
Download as PDF
2796
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(g) Inspection of the Fuselage Skin, Related
Investigative Inspections, and Corrective
Actions
At the applicable compliance times
specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (3) of
this AD, do the fluorescent dye penetrant
inspection of the fuselage skin for corrosion.
Before further flight, do all related
investigative and corrective actions. Follow
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Learjet 60 Service Bulletin 60–
53–19 Revision 3, dated August 29, 2016, (SB
60–53–19, Revision 3) except as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) As of May 22, 2017 (the effective date
of AD 2017–08–07, Amendment 39–18856
(82 FR 18084, April 17, 2017) (‘‘2017–08–
07’’), which was superseded by AD 2017–11–
09), any airplanes with more than 12 years
since the date of issuance of the original
airworthiness certificate or the date of
issuance of the original export certificate of
airworthiness, whichever date is earlier:
Inspect within 12 months after May 22, 2017
(the effective date of AD 2017–08–07, which
was superseded by 2017–11–09).
(2) As of May 22, 2017 (the effective date
of AD 2017–08–07, which was superseded by
AD 2017–11–09), any airplanes with more
than 6 years but equal to or less than 12 years
since the date of issuance of the original
airworthiness certificate or the date of
issuance of the original export certificate of
airworthiness, whichever date is earlier:
Inspect within 24 months after May 22, 2017
(the effective date of AD 2017–08–07, which
was superseded by AD 2017–11–09).
(3) As of May 22, 2017 (the effective date
of AD 2017–08–07, which was superseded by
AD 2017–11–09), any airplanes with 6 years
or less since the date of issuance of the
original airworthiness certificate or the date
of issuance of the original export certificate
of airworthiness, whichever date is earlier:
Inspect within 36 months after May 22, 2017
(the effective date of AD 2017–08–07, which
was superseded by AD 2017–11–09).
Pmangrum on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Retained Service Information Exception,
With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (h) of AD 2017–11–09, with no
changes. Where SB 60–53–19, Revision 3,
specifies contacting Learjet, Inc., for
appropriate action: Before further flight,
repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
(i) Retained Reporting, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (i) of AD 2017–11–09, with no
changes. At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD: Submit
a report of the findings (both positive and
negative) of the inspection required by the
introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD
to: Wichita-COS@faa.gov; or Ann Johnson,
Wichita ACO Branch, 1801 Airport Road,
Wichita, KS 67209. The report must include
the name of the owner, the address of the
owner, the name of the organization
incorporating Learjet 60 Service Bulletin 60–
53–19, the date that inspection was
completed, the name of the person
submitting the report, the address, telephone
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
number, and email of the person submitting
the report, the airplane serial number, the
total time (flight hours) on the airplane, the
total number of landings on the airplane,
whether corrosion was detected, whether
corrosion was repaired, the structural repair
manual (SRM) chapter and revision used (if
repaired), and whether corrosion exceeded
the minimum thickness specified in
Bombardier Learjet 60 SB 60–53–19 (and
specify the SRM chapter and revision, if used
as an aid to determine minimum thickness).
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
May 22, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017–
08–07, which was superseded by AD 2017–
11–09): Submit the report within 30 days
after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before May
22, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017–08–
07, which was superseded by AD 2017–11–
09): Submit the report within 30 days after
May 22, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017–
08–07, which was superseded by AD 2017–
11–09).
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This AD allows credit for the actions
required in the introductory text of paragraph
(g) if completed before the effective date of
this AD using the Accomplishment
Instructions in Learjet 60 SB 60–53–19, dated
November 23, 2015; Learjet 60 SB 60–53–19
Revision 1, dated April 4, 2016; or Learjet 60
SB 60–53–19 Revision 2, dated April 18,
2016.
(k) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden
Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 1 hour per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to
this collection of information are mandatory.
Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the
burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800
Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC
20591, Attn: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, AES–200.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Wichita ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
ACO Branch, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of this
AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by a Learjet, Inc.,
Designated Engineering Representative
(DER), or a Unit Member (UM) of the Learjet
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA), that has been authorized by the
Manager, Wichita ACO Branch, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair,
modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2017–08–07 or AD 2017–11–09 should
continue to be considered approved for the
corresponding requirements in paragraph (g)
of this AD.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Tara Shawn, Aerospace Engineer,
Wichita ACO Branch, 1801 Airport Road,
Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:
(316) 946–4141; fax: (316) 946–4107; email:
tara.shawn@faa.gov or Wichita-COS@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Learjet, Inc., One Learjet
Way, Wichita, KS 67209–2942; telephone:
316–946–2000; fax: 316–946–2220; email:
ac.ict@aero.bombardier.com; internet: https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Policy and
Innovation Division, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January
31, 2019.
Melvin J. Johnson,
Aircraft Certification Service, Deputy
Director, Policy and Innovation Division,
AIR–601.
[FR Doc. 2019–01500 Filed 2–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–1071; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–119–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Services B.V. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Fokker Services B.V. Model F28 Mark
0070 and 0100 airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a determination
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Pmangrum on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary.
This proposed AD would require
revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations. We are
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Fokker Services
B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box
1357, 2130 EL Hoofddorp, the
Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)88–6280–
350; fax +31 (0)88–6280–111; email
technicalservices@fokker.com; internet
https://www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
1071; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2018–1071; Product Identifier 2018–
NM–119–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM
because of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2018–0159,
dated July 25, 2018 (referred to after this
as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Fokker Services B.V. Model F28
Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes. The
MCAI states:
Fokker Services Engineering Report SE–
623 contains the Airworthiness Limitation
Items (ALIs) and Safe Life Items (SLIs) for
Fokker F28 Mark 0070 and Mark 0100
aeroplanes. This report is Part 2 of the
Airworthiness Limitations Section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness,
referred to in Section 06, Appendix 1, of the
Fokker 70/100 Maintenance Review Board
document.
The complete Airworthiness Limitations
Section consists of:
Part 1—Report SE–473, Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMRs)—ref.
EASA AD 2015–0027 [corresponds to FAA
AD 2016–11–22, Amendment 39–18549 (81
FR 36438, June 7, 2016)],
Part 2—Report SE–623, ALIs and SLIs—ref.
EASA AD 2017–0095 [corresponds to FAA
AD 2017–06–06, Amendment 39–18830 (83
FR 8328, February 27, 2018), (‘‘AD 2017–06–
06’’)], and
Part 3—Report SE–672, Fuel ALIs and
CDCCLs—ref. EASA AD 2015–0032
[corresponds to FAA AD 2016–11–15,
Amendment 39–18542 (81 FR 36447, June 7,
2016)].
The instructions contained in those reports
have been identified as mandatory actions for
continued airworthiness. Failure to
accomplish these actions could result in an
unsafe condition.
EASA previously issued [EASA] AD 2017–
0095, requiring the actions described in
Report SE–623 at issue 17. Since that [EASA]
AD was issued, Fokker Services published
issue 18 of Report SE–623, containing new
and/or more restrictive maintenance tasks.
For the reason described above, this
[EASA] AD retains the requirements of
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2797
[EASA] AD 2017–0095, which is superseded,
and requires implementation of the
maintenance actions as specified in the ALS.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
1071.
Relationship Between Proposed AD and
Related ADs
This NPRM does not propose to
supersede AD 2017–06–06. Rather, we
have determined that a stand-alone AD
is more appropriate to address the
changes in the MCAI. This proposed AD
would require revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations.
Accomplishment of the proposed
actions would then terminate all of the
requirements of AD 2017–06–06, and, as
pursuant to AD 2017–06–06, would
continue to provide terminating action
for paragraph (g) of AD 2012–12–07,
Amendment 39–17087 (77 FR 37788,
June 25, 2012).
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Fokker Services B.V. has issued
Fokker Engineering Report SE–623,
Fokker 70/100 Airworthiness
Limitations Section (ALS), Part 2—
(Structure ALI’s and Safe Life Items),
Issue 18, dated June 14, 2018. This
service information describes
airworthiness limitations for safe life
limits. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all the
relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type
design.
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require
revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations.
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
2798
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
This proposed AD would require
revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new
actions (e.g., inspections). Compliance
with these actions is required by 14 CFR
91.403(c). For airplanes that have been
previously modified, altered, or repaired
in the areas addressed by this proposed
AD, the operator may not be able to
accomplish the actions described in the
revised maintenance documents. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR
91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of
compliance according to paragraph (j)(1)
of this proposed AD.
Pmangrum on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 4 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
We have determined that revising the
existing maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 workhours per operator, although we
recognize that this number may vary
from operator to operator. In the past,
we have estimated that this action takes
1 work-hour per airplane. Since
operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their
affected fleet(s), we have determined
that a per-operator estimate is more
accurate than a per-airplane estimate.
Therefore, we estimate the total cost per
operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours ×
$85 per work-hour).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes and associated
appliances to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Fokker Services B.V.: Docket No. FAA–
2018–1071; Product Identifier 2018–
NM–119–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 25,
2019.
(b) Affected ADs
(1) This AD affects AD 2017–06–06,
Amendment 39–18830 (83 FR 8328, February
27, 2018) (‘‘AD 2017–06–06’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) This AD affects AD 2012–12–07,
Amendment 39–17087 (77 FR 37788, June
25, 2012) (‘‘AD 2012–12–07’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Fokker Services B.V.
Model F28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 05, Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination
that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. We are issuing this
AD to address reduced structural integrity of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Maintenance or Inspection Program
Revision
Within 90 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the information specified in
Fokker Engineering Report SE–623, Fokker
70/100 Airworthiness Limitations Section
Part 2—(Structure ALI’s and Safe Life Items),
Issue 18, dated June 14, 2018.
(1) The initial compliance time for doing
the tasks is at the time specified in Fokker
Engineering Report SE–623, Fokker 70/100
Airworthiness Limitations Section Part 2—
(Structure ALI’s and Safe Life Items), Issue
18, dated June 14, 2018, or within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
(2) If any discrepancy is found, before
further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA;
or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Fokker B.V. Service’s EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be
used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD.
(i) Terminating Action for Affected ADs
(1) Accomplishing the actions required by
this AD terminates all requirements of AD
2017–06–06.
(2) Accomplishing the actions required by
this AD terminates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2012–12–07.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
EASA; or Fokker Services B.V.’s EASA DOA.
If approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2018–0159, dated July 25, 2018, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2018–1071.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3226.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V.,
Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357,
2130 EL Hoofddorp, the Netherlands;
telephone +31 (0)88–6280–350; fax +31
(0)88–6280–111; email technicalservices@
fokker.com; internet https://
www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
Pmangrum on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
January 10, 2019.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–01527 Filed 2–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 154
[Docket Number USCG–1999–5705]
RIN 1625–AA–12 and 2115–AE87
Marine Transportation-Related Facility
Response Plans for Hazardous
Substances
Coast Guard, DHS.
Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ‘‘Marine
Transportation-Related Facility
Response Plans for Hazardous
Substances’’ that we published on
March 31, 2000. The Coast Guard is
withdrawing this rulemaking based on
findings that the proposed rules are no
longer appropriate to the current state of
spill response in the chemical industry.
DATES: The notice of proposed
rulemaking published March 31, 2000,
at 65 FR 17416, is withdrawn as of
February 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking is available by
searching docket number USCG–1999–
5705 using the Federal portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
withdrawal, call or email Mr.
Christopher Friese, Commercial Vessel
Safety Specialist, Office of Marine
Environmental Response Policy (CG–
MER–1), Coast Guard; telephone 202–
372–1227.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
OPA 90 Oil Pollution Act of 1990
CTAC Chemical Transportation Advisory
Committee
II. Background
The Clean Water Act,1 as amended by
section 4202(a)(6) of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990 (OPA 90),2 requires owners
or operators of tank vessels, offshore
facilities, and onshore facilities to
prepare response plans to mitigate spills
of both oils and hazardous substances.
These plans must address measures to
respond, to the maximum extent
practicable, to a worst-case discharge or
a substantial threat of such a discharge,
1 33
U.S.C. 1321(j)(5).
Law 101–380, 104 Stat. 484.
2 Public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2799
of oil or a hazardous substance into or
on navigable waters, adjoining
shorelines, or the exclusive economic
zone of the United States. The primary
purpose of requiring response plans is
to minimize the impact of a discharge of
oil or hazardous substances into the
navigable waters of the United States.
On May 3, 1996, we published an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
soliciting public input on regulations
concerning response plans for certain
tank vessels and marine transportationrelated facilities (61 FR 20083), and
subsequently held two public meetings
on the subject that were announced in
the Federal Register (61 FR 34775). On
March 31, 2000, we published a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register entitled ‘‘Marine
Transportation-Related Facility
Response Plans for Hazardous
Substances’’ (65 FR 17416). In the
NPRM, we proposed regulations
requiring response plans for certain
Marine Transportation-Related facilities.
The Coast Guard received feedback from
concerned citizens, commercial entities,
and trade associations regarding the
proposed rulemaking. These comments
were made available in the docket.
Since then, further analysis by the Coast
Guard and the Chemical Transportation
Advisory Committee (CTAC) has shown
that implementation of the rules as laid
out in the 2000 NPRM would not
significantly increase response
effectiveness at this time.
CTAC also identified many areas in
which the NPRM may overlap with
existing local and state regulatory
schemes as well as current industry
practice. Most coastal states already
have regulations in place governing spill
response at facilities that handle
hazardous substances. Area Planning
Committees have also been voluntarily
incorporating hazardous substances into
their contingency plans, as facilities that
handle hazardous chemicals are often
located near sites that process oil.
Furthermore, organizations like the
Chemical Transportation Emergency
Center and Spill Center have
demonstrated that synergies from oil
response may also be utilized in
hazardous substance response. Marine
transportation related facilities handling
oil products must also comply with the
Coast Guard’s Facility Response Plan
requirements.3 Although these
requirements address planning for oil
spill response, these best practices may
also be applied to hazardous substance
response to an extent. Due to the
services and requirements industry
frequently engages in to satisfy
3 33
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
CFR part 154, subpart F.
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2796-2799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01527]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-1071; Product Identifier 2018-NM-119-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Fokker Services B.V. Model F28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a determination
[[Page 2797]]
that new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary.
This proposed AD would require revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations. We are proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Fokker
Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357, 2130 EL
Hoofddorp, the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)88-6280-350; fax +31
(0)88-6280-111; email technicalservices@fokker.com; internet https://www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
1071; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-1071;
Product Identifier 2018-NM-119-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018-0159, dated July 25, 2018 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for all Fokker Services B.V. Model F28 Mark 0070 and
0100 airplanes. The MCAI states:
Fokker Services Engineering Report SE-623 contains the
Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALIs) and Safe Life Items (SLIs) for
Fokker F28 Mark 0070 and Mark 0100 aeroplanes. This report is Part 2
of the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness, referred to in Section 06, Appendix 1, of
the Fokker 70/100 Maintenance Review Board document.
The complete Airworthiness Limitations Section consists of:
Part 1--Report SE-473, Certification Maintenance Requirements
(CMRs)--ref. EASA AD 2015-0027 [corresponds to FAA AD 2016-11-22,
Amendment 39-18549 (81 FR 36438, June 7, 2016)],
Part 2--Report SE-623, ALIs and SLIs--ref. EASA AD 2017-0095
[corresponds to FAA AD 2017-06-06, Amendment 39-18830 (83 FR 8328,
February 27, 2018), (``AD 2017-06-06'')], and
Part 3--Report SE-672, Fuel ALIs and CDCCLs--ref. EASA AD 2015-
0032 [corresponds to FAA AD 2016-11-15, Amendment 39-18542 (81 FR
36447, June 7, 2016)].
The instructions contained in those reports have been identified
as mandatory actions for continued airworthiness. Failure to
accomplish these actions could result in an unsafe condition.
EASA previously issued [EASA] AD 2017-0095, requiring the
actions described in Report SE-623 at issue 17. Since that [EASA] AD
was issued, Fokker Services published issue 18 of Report SE-623,
containing new and/or more restrictive maintenance tasks.
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of [EASA] AD 2017-0095, which is superseded, and
requires implementation of the maintenance actions as specified in
the ALS.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
1071.
Relationship Between Proposed AD and Related ADs
This NPRM does not propose to supersede AD 2017-06-06. Rather, we
have determined that a stand-alone AD is more appropriate to address
the changes in the MCAI. This proposed AD would require revising the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations.
Accomplishment of the proposed actions would then terminate all of the
requirements of AD 2017-06-06, and, as pursuant to AD 2017-06-06, would
continue to provide terminating action for paragraph (g) of AD 2012-12-
07, Amendment 39-17087 (77 FR 37788, June 25, 2012).
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Fokker Services B.V. has issued Fokker Engineering Report SE-623,
Fokker 70/100 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS), Part 2--
(Structure ALI's and Safe Life Items), Issue 18, dated June 14, 2018.
This service information describes airworthiness limitations for safe
life limits. This service information is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations.
[[Page 2798]]
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revised maintenance
documents. In this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the
operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance
according to paragraph (j)(1) of this proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 4 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
We have determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although we recognize that this number may vary from operator to
operator. In the past, we have estimated that this action takes 1 work-
hour per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), we have
determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-
airplane estimate. Therefore, we estimate the total cost per operator
to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Fokker Services B.V.: Docket No. FAA-2018-1071; Product Identifier
2018-NM-119-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 25, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
(1) This AD affects AD 2017-06-06, Amendment 39-18830 (83 FR
8328, February 27, 2018) (``AD 2017-06-06'').
(2) This AD affects AD 2012-12-07, Amendment 39-17087 (77 FR
37788, June 25, 2012) (``AD 2012-12-07'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Fokker Services B.V. Model F28 Mark 0070
and 0100 airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. We are issuing
this AD to address reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision
Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the information specified in Fokker Engineering Report
SE-623, Fokker 70/100 Airworthiness Limitations Section Part 2--
(Structure ALI's and Safe Life Items), Issue 18, dated June 14,
2018.
(1) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks is at the
time specified in Fokker Engineering Report SE-623, Fokker 70/100
Airworthiness Limitations Section Part 2--(Structure ALI's and Safe
Life Items), Issue 18, dated June 14, 2018, or within 90 days after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) If any discrepancy is found, before further flight, repair
using a method approved by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA); or Fokker B.V. Service's EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature.
(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD.
(i) Terminating Action for Affected ADs
(1) Accomplishing the actions required by this AD terminates all
requirements of AD 2017-06-06.
(2) Accomplishing the actions required by this AD terminates the
requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2012-12-07.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International
[[Page 2799]]
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
International Section, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or Fokker
Services B.V.'s EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2018-0159, dated July 25, 2018, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-1071.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax 206-231-3226.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Fokker Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357, 2130
EL Hoofddorp, the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)88-6280-350; fax +31
(0)88-6280-111; email technicalservices@fokker.com; internet https://www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206-231-3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on January 10, 2019.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-01527 Filed 2-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P