Qualified Business Income Deduction, 3015-3023 [2019-01023]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
5279; concerning submissions of
comments or requests for a public
hearing, Regina Johnson at (202) 317–
6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–134652–18]
RIN 1545–BP12
Qualified Business Income Deduction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations concerning the
deduction for qualified business income
under section 199A of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). The proposed
regulations will affect certain
individuals, partnerships, S
corporations, trusts, and estates. The
proposed regulations provide guidance
on the treatment of previously
suspended losses that constitute
qualified business income. The
proposed regulations also provide
guidance on the determination of the
section 199A deduction for taxpayers
that hold interests in regulated
investment companies, charitable
remainder trusts, and split-interest
trusts.
SUMMARY:
Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by April 9, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
submissions to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate
IRS and REG–134652–18) by following
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments
cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS will publish
for public availability any comment
received to its public docket, whether
submitted electronically or in hard
copy. Send hard copy submissions to
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–134652–18), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–134652–
18), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning § 1.199A–3(d), Michael Y.
Chin or Steven Harrison at (202) 317–
6842; concerning §§ 1.199A–3(b) and
1.199A–6, Vishal R. Amin or Frank J.
Fisher at (202) 317–6850 or Robert D.
Alinsky or Margaret Burow at 202–317–
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
section 199A of the Code.
Section 199A was enacted on
December 22, 2017, by section 11011 of
‘‘An Act to provide for reconciliation
pursuant to titles II and V of the
concurrent resolution on the budget for
fiscal year 2018,’’ Public Law 115–97
(TCJA), and was amended on March 23,
2018, retroactively to January 1, 2018,
by section 101 of Division T of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018,
Public Law 115–141, (2018 Act). Section
199A applies to taxable years beginning
after 2017 and before 2026.
Section 199A provides a deduction of
up to 20 percent of qualified business
income from a U.S. trade or business
operated as a sole proprietorship or
through a partnership, S corporation,
trust, or estate (section 199A deduction).
The section 199A deduction may be
taken by individuals and by some
estates and trusts. A section 199A
deduction is not available for wage
income or for income earned by a C
corporation. For taxpayers whose
taxable income exceeds a statutorilydefined amount (threshold amount),
section 199A may limit the taxpayer’s
section 199A deduction based on (i) the
type of trade or business engaged in by
the taxpayer, (ii) the amount of W–2
wages paid with respect to the trade or
business (W–2 wages), and/or (iii) the
unadjusted basis immediately after
acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property
held for use in the trade or business
(UBIA of qualified property). These
statutory limitations are subject to
phase-in rules based upon taxable
income above the threshold amount.
Section 199A also allows individuals
and some trusts and estates (but not
corporations) a deduction of up to 20
percent of their combined qualified real
estate investment trust (REIT) dividends
and qualified publicly traded
partnership (PTP) income, including
qualified REIT dividends and qualified
PTP income earned through
passthrough entities. This component of
the section 199A deduction is not
limited by W–2 wages or UBIA of
qualified property.
The section 199A deduction is the
lesser of (1) the sum of the combined
amounts described in the prior two
paragraphs or (2) an amount equal to 20
percent of the excess (if any) of taxable
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3015
income of the taxpayer for the taxable
year over the net capital gain of the
taxpayer for the taxable year.
Additionally, section 199A(g)
provides that specified agricultural or
horticultural cooperatives may claim a
special entity-level deduction that is
substantially similar to the domestic
production activities deduction under
former section 199.
The statute expressly grants the
Secretary authority to prescribe such
regulations as are necessary to carry out
the purposes of section 199A (section
199A(f)(4)), and also provides specific
grants of authority with respect to
certain issues: The treatment of
acquisitions, dispositions, and short-tax
years (section 199A(b)(5)); certain
payments to partners for services
rendered in a non-partner capacity
(section 199A(c)(4)(C)); the allocation of
W–2 wages and UBIA of qualified
property (section 199A(f)(1)(A)(iii));
restricting the allocation of items and
wages under section 199A and such
reporting requirements as the Secretary
determines appropriate (section
199A(f)(4)(A)); the application of section
199A in the case of tiered entities
(section 199A(f)(4)(B); preventing the
manipulation of the depreciable period
of qualified property using transactions
between related parties (section
199A(h)(1)); and determining the UBIA
of qualified property acquired in likekind exchanges or involuntary
conversions (section 199A(h)(2)).
The Treasury Department and the
Internal Revenue Service published
proposed regulations interpreting
section 199A on August 16, 2018 (the
August Proposed Regulations) (83 FR
40884). The August Proposed
Regulations contain six substantive
sections, §§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–
6, each of which provides rules relevant
to the calculation of the section 199A
deduction. The August Proposed
Regulations, with modifications in
response to comments and testimony
received, were adopted as final
regulations in TD 9847, issued
concurrently with this notice of
proposed rulemaking and published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.
Explanation of Provisions
These proposed regulations propose
rules addressing issues not addressed in
the August Proposed Regulations that
are necessary to provide taxpayers with
computational, definitional, and antiavoidance guidance regarding the
application of section 199A.
Specifically, these proposed regulations
contain amendments to two substantive
sections of the August Proposed
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
3016
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Regulations, §§ 1.199A–3 and 1.199A–6,
each of which provides rules relevant to
the calculation of the section 199A
deduction. These additional proposed
rules respond to comments received on
the August Proposed Regulations as
well as address certain issues identified
after additional study. This Explanation
of Provisions describes each of the
proposed rules contained in this
document in turn. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of these
proposed regulations.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
I. Treatment of Previously Suspended
Losses That Constitute QBI
Section 1.199A–3(b)(1)(iv) of the final
regulations provides that previously
disallowed losses or deductions
(including under sections 465, 469,
704(d), and 1366(d)) allowed in the
taxable year are generally taken into
account for purposes of computing QBI
except to the extent the losses or
deductions were disallowed,
suspended, limited, or carried over from
taxable years ending before January 1,
2018. The final regulations also provide
a first-in-first-out ordering rule. One
commenter on the August Proposed
Regulations suggested that a special rule
should be provided to identify the
section 469 trade or business losses that
are used to offset income if the
taxpayer’s section 469 groupings differ
from the taxpayer’s section 199A
aggregations. The commenter
recommended that any section 469 loss
carryforward that is later used should be
allocated across the taxpayer’s section
199A aggregations based on income
with respect to such aggregations in the
year the loss was generated.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that that previously disallowed
losses should be treated as losses from
a separate trade or business for both the
reasons stated by the commenter and
because the losses may relate to a trade
or business that is no longer in
existence. Accordingly, these proposed
regulations amend § 1.199A–3(b)(1)(iv)
to provide that such losses are treated as
loss from a separate trade or business.
To the extent that losses relate to a PTP,
they must be treated as losses from a
separate PTP. Section 1.199A–
3(b)(1)(iv)(B) provides that attributes of
the disallowed loss are determined in
the year the loss is incurred.
II. Regulated Investment Companies
With Interests in REITs and PTPs
A. REITs
Section 1.199A–3 restates the
definitions in section 199A(c) and
provides additional guidance on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
determination of QBI, qualified REIT
dividends, and qualified PTP income.
For simplicity, the regulations use the
term individual when referring to an
individual, trust, estate, or other person
eligible to claim the section 199A
deduction. See § 1.199A–1(a)(2). The
term relevant passthrough entity (RPE)
is used to describe passthrough entities
that directly operate the trade or
business or pass through the trade or
business’ items of income, gain, loss, or
deduction from lower-tier RPEs to the
individual. See § 1.199A–1(b)(10).
A number of commenters on the
August Proposed Regulations requested
guidance that would allow a
shareholder in a regulated investment
company within the meaning of section
851(a) (RIC) to take a section 199A
deduction with respect to certain
income of, or distributions from, the
RIC. Because a RIC is a subchapter C
corporation, a shareholder in a RIC
generally does not take into account a
share of the RIC’s items of income,
deduction, gain, or loss. Part 1 of
subchapter M, however, has features
that allow the tax consequences of
investing in a RIC to approximate those
of a direct investment in the assets of
the RIC. The principal feature is the
allowance of the deduction for
dividends paid under section
852(b)(2)(D). If a corporation qualifies as
a RIC under section 851 and meets the
distribution requirements and other
requirements in section 852(a), the RIC’s
income tax is computed on its
investment company taxable income
(ICTI), which is its taxable income with
certain adjustments, including the
allowance of the deduction for
dividends paid. See section 852(b)(2).
ICTI also excludes the amount of the
RIC’s net capital gain, but tax is
separately imposed on that amount to
the extent it exceeds the deduction for
dividends paid, taking into account only
capital gain dividends. See section
852(b)(3)(A). The deduction for
dividends paid allows RICs to eliminate
all or most of their corporate income tax
liability.
If a RIC has certain items of income
or gain, subchapter M also provides
rules under which a RIC may pay
dividends that a shareholder in the RIC
may treat in the same manner (or a
similar manner) as the shareholder
would treat the underlying item of
income or gain if the shareholder
realized it directly. Although this
treatment differs fundamentally from
the pass-through treatment of partners
or trust beneficiaries, this preamble
refers to is as ‘‘conduit treatment.’’ For
example, under section 852(b)(3), a RIC
that has net capital gain for a taxable
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
year generally may pay capital gain
dividends, and shareholders receiving
the capital gain dividends treat them as
gain from the sale or exchange of a
capital asset held for more than one
year. Section 852(b)(3) provides
necessary limits and procedures that
apply to capital gain dividends. There
are similar statutory provisions for
exempt-interest dividends under section
852(b)(5), interest-related dividends
under section 871(k)(1), short-term
capital gain dividends under section
871(k)(2), dividends eligible for the
dividends received deduction under
section 854(b)(1)(A), and qualified
dividend income under section
854(b)(1)(B). Rules for paying dividends
corresponding to different types of longterm capital gain have been provided in
guidance under regulatory authority
granted in section 1(h). See Notice
2015–41, 2015–24 I.R.B. 1058,
modifying Notice 2004–39, 2004–1 C.B.
982 and Notice 97–64, 1997–2 C.B. 323.
Investing in RICs enables small
investors to gain benefits, such as
professional management and broad
diversification, that otherwise would be
available only to investors with more
resources. The House Report for the
enactment of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954 explained that the RIC regime
‘‘permits investors to pool their funds
through the use of a corporation in order
to obtain skilled, diversified investment
in corporate securities without having to
pay an additional layer of corporate
tax.’’ H.R. Rep. No. 83–1337, p. 73
(1954). The ability to elect to be taxed
as a RIC is available typically only to
domestic corporations that, at all times
during the taxable year, are registered
under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 to
80b–2). See section 851(a)(1)(A).
Section 199A(f)(4) directs the
Secretary to prescribe such regulations
as are necessary to carry out the
purposes of section 199A, including
regulations for its application in the
case of tiered entities. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have
determined that it is consistent with the
grant of authority under section 199A
and the purposes of part 1 of subchapter
M of chapter 1 of the Code to provide
for conduit treatment of qualified REIT
dividends. The Treasury Department
and the IRS continue to consider
whether it is appropriate to provide for
conduit treatment of qualified PTP
income.
These proposed regulations provide
rules under which a RIC that receives
qualified REIT dividends may pay
section 199A dividends. Non-corporate
shareholders receiving section 199A
dividends would treat them as qualified
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
REIT dividends under section
199A(e)(3), provided the shareholder
meets the holding period requirements
for its shares in the RIC.
The rules under which a RIC would
compute and report section 199A
dividends are based on the rules for
capital gain dividends in section
852(b)(3) and exempt-interest dividends
in section 852(b)(5). The amount of a
RIC’s section 199A dividends for a
taxable year would be limited to the
excess of the RIC’s qualified REIT
dividends for the taxable year over
allocable expenses. Section 199A
dividends generally are also subject to
the principles that apply to other RIC
dividends. See, e.g., Rev. Rul. 2005–31,
2005–1 C.B. 1084; Rev. Rul. 89–81,
1989–1 C.B. 226.
B. PTPs
One of the commenters
recommending that the regulations
permit conduit treatment for qualified
REIT dividends received by a RIC also
recommended that the regulations
permit conduit treatment for qualified
PTP income received by a RIC. In
response to this comment, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have given
significant consideration to including in
this notice of proposed rulemaking
regulations that would provide conduit
treatment for qualified PTP income.
However, unlike conduit treatment for
qualified REIT dividends received by a
RIC, conduit treatment of qualified PTP
income received by a RIC presents
several novel issues. The commenter
recommending this conduit treatment
did not address these issues or make
any suggestions as to how they should
be resolved. The need to resolve these
issues in a way that would afford RIC
shareholders treatment that is similar to
the treatment they would receive if they
held the PTP interests directly while
preserving the relative simplicity of the
tax treatment of RIC investors has
prevented the Treasury Department and
the IRS from crafting and including
appropriate rules in these proposed
regulations. As noted later in this part
of the Explanation of Provisions, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
continue to consider permitting conduit
treatment for qualified PTP income
received by a RIC to further the
purposes of section 199A(b)(1)(B) and
seek public comment to assist in
resolving these novel issues with a view
to developing regulations permitting
conduit treatment for qualified PTP
income.
These issues arise in part from the fact
that income attributable to a specified
service trade or business within the
meaning of section 199A(d)(2) (SSTB) of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
a PTP may be qualified PTP income for
taxpayers with taxable income below
the threshold amount, but not for
taxpayers with taxable income above the
top of the phase-out range. For
taxpayers with taxable income in the
phase-out range, a portion of PTP
income attributable to an SSTB is
qualified PTP income. There is no
precedent for providing conduit
treatment for a RIC (or any other C
corporation) with respect to income of
a PTP or other partnership taxed in this
manner, and the complexity and
potential confusion such treatment
might create for RIC investors is
arguably inconsistent with the relative
simplicity that the tax system has
historically provided for RIC investors.
This is particularly true given the
limitation on the portion of a RIC’s
assets that can be invested in qualified
PTPs as defined in section 851(h) (the
type of PTP likely to be engaged in a
trade or business) and the limited
portion of the RIC’s dividends that
would likely be attributable to income
from such PTPs.
Another novel issue is presented by
the rules relating to the treatment of
losses for purposes of section 199A.
First, a PTP may not net losses from an
SSTB against income from a non-SSTB,
and vice versa, in determining the
amounts that it reports to its partners.
Thus, PTPs are required to separately
calculate income and deductions from
SSTBs and non-SSTBs and report that
information to their partners. Second, if
a taxpayer has a net loss from an SSTB
or a non-SSTB that is allowed in
determining taxable income for a
taxable year, that loss may be required
to be carried over to the subsequent year
for section 199A attribute purposes. In
the case of a RIC, it is not clear to what
extent these requirements can be
implemented by permitting RIC
dividends to reflect attributes of the
RIC’s investment experiences in PTPs.
For example, it is difficult to conceive
how losses of a RIC can be passed
through to shareholders upon the
payment of a dividend, which would be
inconsistent with the status of a RIC as
a C corporation. See section 311(a). In
addition, RICs and RIC shareholders
would experience complexity
inconsistent with the longstanding tax
policy of providing simplified reporting
for RIC investors.
Consistent with RICs’ status as C
corporations, RICs could instead offset
losses from PTPs against qualified REIT
dividends received, with any excess
PTP losses carried forward as negative
qualified PTP income for section 199A
attribute purposes at the RIC level. To
the extent RICs would be required to
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3017
carry forward PTP losses, it would
appear that RICs would need to track
separate loss carryforwards for SSTB
PTP losses and non-SSTB PTP losses.
While netting qualified non-SSTB losses
from PTPs against larger amounts of
qualified REIT dividends would support
RIC dividends that could be treated as
eligible for the section 199A deduction
by the RICs’ shareholders regardless of
income level, SSTB losses from PTPs
would complicate the offset of qualified
PTP losses against qualified REIT
dividends by RICs because SSTB losses
from a PTP do not offset qualified REIT
dividends for taxpayers with taxable
income above the phase-out range. Such
losses do, however, offset qualified REIT
dividends for taxpayers with income
below the threshold amount. For
taxpayers with income in the phase-out
range, these losses partially offset
qualified REIT dividends to a greater or
lesser extent depending on where the
taxpayer’s income falls in the phase-out
range. It is not clear how a conduit
regime for qualified PTP income could
work in terms of treating RIC
shareholders in the phase-out range in
a manner that is consistent with the
treatment they would receive if they
received the qualified REIT dividend
and the qualified PTP loss from an
SSTB directly rather than through a RIC.
Providing conduit treatment for
qualified PTP income would also raise
potentially significant issues with
respect to the treatment of RIC
shareholders that are non-U.S. persons,
tax-exempt organizations, and trusts
underlying individual retirement
accounts (IRAs) and qualified retirement
plans. In order to be qualified PTP
income, section 199A(c)(3)(A)(i)
requires that the income must be
effectively connected with a U.S. trade
or business. If conduit treatment is
afforded to RIC dividends attributable to
such PTP income for section 199A
purposes, it is not clear that a RIC
dividend attributable to such income
could be disregarded for purposes of
calculating effectively connected
income of a non-U.S. shareholder or
unrelated business taxable income of a
tax-exempt organization or trust
underlying an IRA or qualified
retirement plan. Given that such
investors typically do not hold directly
interests in PTPs intentionally, but do
so through corporate ‘‘blockers,’’
allowing conduit treatment for qualified
PTP income through RICs could cause
unwelcome results for non-U.S.
shareholders, tax-exempt organizations,
and trusts underlying IRAs and
qualified retirement plans holding RIC
stock.
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
3018
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
The Treasury Department and the IRS
continue to evaluate whether it is
appropriate to provide conduit
treatment for qualified PTP income
through RICs, and request detailed
comments on these novel issues. In
particular, comments are requested
concerning: (1) Whether RICs have
sufficient qualified items of PTP
income, gain, deduction, or loss to
warrant a conduit regime that would
permit RICs to pay qualified PTP
dividends to shareholders; (2) How to
provide conduit treatment for qualified
PTP income for taxpayers with income
below the threshold amount or within
the phase-out range, particularly where
a RIC has qualified REIT dividends and
a qualified PTP loss from an SSTB; (3)
How to treat losses of PTPs arising from
SSTBs and non-SSTBs; (4) Whether
conduit treatment for qualified PTP
income can be disregarded for purposes
of determining the effectively connected
income or unrelated business taxable
income of certain RIC shareholders; (5)
Whether SSTB items are sufficiently
rare or incidental for PTPs that a
conduit regime for PTP dividends
should exclude all SSTB items; and (6)
How to implement conduit treatment for
qualified PTP income in a way that is
consistent with the policy goal of
preserving the overall relative simplicity
of the tax treatment of investors in RICs
while still achieving the policy goals of
section 199A and section 199A(b)(1)(B)
in particular.
III. Special Rules for Trusts and Estates
Section 1.199A–6 provides guidance
that certain specified entities (for
example, trusts and estates) may need to
follow to enable the computation of the
section 199A deduction of the entity
and each of its owners. Section 1.199A–
6(d) contains special rules for applying
section 199A to trusts and decedents’
estates. The August Proposed
Regulations expressly requested
comments, and comments were
submitted, on whether and how certain
trusts and other entities would be able
to take a deduction under section 199A.
These proposed regulations take those
suggestions into consideration in
proposing rules applicable to those
particular situations identified by
commenters.
In the case of a section 199A
deduction claimed by a non-grantor
trust or estate, section 199A(f)(1)(B)
applies rules similar to the rules under
former section 199(d)(1)(B)(i) for the
apportionment of W–2 wages and the
apportionment of UBIA of qualified
property. In the case of a non-grantor
trust or estate, the QBI and expenses
properly allocable to the business,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
including the W–2 wages relevant to the
computation of the wage limitation, and
relevant UBIA of depreciable property
must be allocated among the trust or
estate and its various beneficiaries.
Specifically, § 1.199A–6(d)(3)(ii)
provides that each beneficiary’s share of
the trust’s or estate’s QBI and W–2
wages is determined based on the
proportion of the trust’s or estate’s DNI
that is deemed to be distributed to that
beneficiary for that taxable year.
Similarly, the proportion of the entity’s
DNI that is not deemed distributed by
the trust or estate will determine the
entity’s share of the QBI and W–2
wages. In addition, if the trust or estate
has no DNI in a particular taxable year,
any QBI and W–2 wages are allocated to
the trust or estate, and not to any
beneficiary.
In addition, § 1.199A–6(d)(3)(ii)
provides that, to the extent the trust’s or
estate’s UBIA of qualified property is
relevant to a trust or estate and any
beneficiary, the trust’s or estate’s UBIA
of qualified property will be allocated
among the trust or estate and its
beneficiaries in the same proportions as
is the DNI of the trust or estate. This is
the case regardless of how any
depreciation or depletion deductions
resulting from the same property may be
allocated under section 643(c) among
the trust or estate and its beneficiaries
for purposes other than section 199A.
Under § 1.199A–6(d)(3)(iv), the
threshold amount is determined at the
trust level after taking into account any
distribution deductions. Commenters
have noted that taxpayers could
circumvent the threshold amount by
dividing assets among multiple trusts,
each of which would claim its own
threshold amount. This result is
inappropriate and inconsistent with the
purpose of section 199A. Therefore,
§ 1.199A–6(d)(3)(vii) provides that a
trust formed or funded with a principal
purpose of receiving a deduction under
section 199A will not be respected for
purposes of determining the threshold
amount under section 199A.
In the August Proposed Regulations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
requested comments with respect to
whether taxable recipients of annuity
and unitrust interests in charitable
remainder trusts and taxable
beneficiaries of other split-interest trusts
may be eligible for the section 199A
deduction to the extent that the amounts
received by such recipients include
amounts that may give rise to the
deduction. The request for such
comments indicated that such
comments should include explanations
of how amounts that may give rise to the
section 199A deduction would be
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
identified and reported in the various
classes of income of the trusts received
by such recipients and how the excise
tax rules in section 664(c) would apply
to such amounts.
A. Charitable Remainder Trust
Beneficiary’s Eligibility for the
Deduction
A few commenters suggested that a
charitable remainder trust under section
664 should be allowed to calculate the
deduction at the trust level and that the
charitable remainder trust should be
treated as a single taxpayer for purposes
of the thresholds for taxable income, W–
2 wages, and UBIA of qualified
property.
Several commenters recommended
that, if unrelated business taxable
income (UBTI) is qualified business
income, the section 199A deduction
should be allowed before the UBTI
excise tax is imposed. However, other
commenters disagreed. Another
commenter stated that the section 199A
deduction should not be allowed when
calculating UBTI because it is not a
deduction directly connected with
carrying on the trade or business and is
allowable only for purposes of chapter
1, while the excise tax on UBTI is
imposed under chapter 42 (that is, it is
not an income tax). Another commenter
said the UBTI excise tax under section
664(c) should not affect QBI because
that tax is charged to principal.
One commenter recommended that
QBI should be allocated to the ordinary
income tier. Another recommended that
QBI should be the bottom of the first tier
(last to be distributed) and section 199A
items should be reported on the
Schedule K–1 when QBI is deemed
distributed. Another commenter stated
that a charitable remainder trust has no
taxable income and no DNI, so the
allocation of QBI, W–2 wages, and UBIA
of qualified property should be
allocated to beneficiaries based on the
percentage of distributions from the
ordinary income tier, with QBI allocated
to the charitable remainder trust
remaining a tier one item. Another
commenter stated that QBI cannot be a
separate tier because it is a deduction,
rather than a rate difference.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that, because a charitable
remainder trust described in section 664
is not subject to income tax, and
because the excise tax imposed by
section 664(c) is treated as imposed
under chapter 42, the trust does not
either have or calculate a section 199A
deduction and the threshold amount
described in section 199A(e)(2) does not
apply to the trust. Furthermore,
application of section 199A to
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
effectively reduce the 100 percent rate
of tax imposed by section 664(c) on any
UBTI would be inconsistent with the
intent of section 664(c) to deter trusts
from making investments that generate
significant UBTI. However, any taxable
recipient of a unitrust or annuity
amount from the trust must determine
and apply the recipient’s own threshold
amount for purposes of section 199A,
taking into account any annuity or
unitrust amounts received from the
trust. Therefore, a taxable recipient of a
unitrust or annuity amount from a
charitable remainder trust may take into
account QBI, qualified REIT dividends,
and qualified PTP income for purposes
of determining the recipient’s section
199A deduction for the taxable year to
the extent that the unitrust or annuity
amount distributed to such recipient
consists of such section 199A items
under § 1.664–1(d).
In order to determine the order of
distribution of the various classes of
income of the trust for purposes of
applying § 1.664–1(d), QBI, qualified
REIT dividends, and qualified PTP
income of a charitable remainder trust
will be allocated to the classes of
income within the category of income
described in § 1.664–1(d)(1)(i)(a)(1)
based on the rate of tax that normally
would apply to that type of income, not
taking into account the characterization
of that income as QBI, qualified REIT
dividends, or qualified PTP income for
purposes of section 199A. Accordingly,
any QBI, qualified REIT dividends, and
qualified PTP income will be treated as
distributed from the trust to a unitrust
or annuity recipient only when all other
classes of income within the ordinary
income category subject to a higher rate
of tax (not taking into account section
199A) have been exhausted. The
unitrust or annuity recipient will be
treated as receiving a proportionate
amount of any QBI, qualified REIT
dividends, and qualified PTP income
that is distributed along with other
income in the same class within the
ordinary income category. To the extent
that a trust is treated as distributing QBI,
qualified REIT dividends, or qualified
PTP income to more than one unitrust
or annuity recipient in the taxable year,
the distribution of such income will be
treated as made to the recipients
proportionately, based on their
respective shares of the total of QBI,
qualified REIT dividends, and qualified
PTP income distributed for that year.
The amount of any W–2 wages or UBIA
of qualified property of the charitable
remainder trust in a taxable year will be
allocable to unitrust or annuity
recipients based on each recipient’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
share of the trust’s total QBI (whether or
not distributed) for that taxable year.
Any QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or
qualified PTP income of the trust that is
unrelated business taxable income is
subject to excise tax and § 1.664–1(c)
requires that tax to be allocated to the
corpus of the trust. Certain other rules
relating to charitable remainder trusts
are provided.
B. Split-interest Trusts
The August Proposed Regulations
requested comments on whether any
special rules were necessary with
respect to split-interest trusts. One
commenter suggested that additional
rules may be necessary for split-interest
trusts other than charitable reminder
trusts. After considering the comment
and studying other split-interest trusts
in more depth after the publication of
the August Proposed Regulations, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that special rules for other
split-interest trusts, such as non-grantor
charitable lead trusts or pooled income
funds, are not necessary because such
trusts are taxable under part I,
subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code,
except subpart E. Such split-interest
trusts would apply the rules for nongrantor trusts and estates set forth in
§ 1.199A–6(d)(3) to determine any
applicable section 199A deduction for
the trust or its taxable beneficiaries.
C. Separate Shares
Although no comments were received
with respect the application of the
threshold amount to separate shares, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that clarification with respect to
this issue may be necessary. These
proposed regulations provide that, in
the case of a trust described in section
663(c) with substantially separate and
independent shares for multiple
beneficiaries, such separate shares will
not be treated as separate trusts for
purposes of applying the threshold
amount. Instead, the trust will be treated
as a single trust for purposes of
determining whether the taxable income
of the trust exceeds the threshold
amount. The purpose of the separate
share rule in section 663(c) is to treat
distributions of trust DNI to trust
beneficiaries as independent taxable
events solely for purposes of applying
sections 661 and 662 with respect to
each beneficiary’s separate share. The
rule determines each beneficiary’s share
of DNI based on the amount of DNI from
that beneficiary’s separate share, rather
than as a percentage of the trust’s DNI.
Nevertheless, under the separate share
rule, if a trust retains any portion of
DNI, the trust will be subject to tax as
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3019
a single trust with respect to the
retained DNI. Only trusts with retained
DNI will be eligible for the section 199A
deduction, because a trust will be
allocated QBI, qualified REIT dividends,
and qualified PTP income only in
proportion to the amount of DNI
retained by the trust for the taxable year.
For this reason, a trust, regardless of the
number of separate shares it has for its
beneficiaries under the separate share
rule of section 663(c), will be treated as
a single trust for purposes of applying
the threshold amount under section
199A. To the extent that a taxable
beneficiary of a trust receives a
distribution of DNI from the
beneficiary’s separate share of the trust
which includes section 199A items, the
beneficiary would apply its own
threshold amount to those section 199A
items in computing its section 199A
deduction in accordance with the rules
of § 1.199A–6(d).
Availability of IRS Documents
IRS notices cited in this preamble are
made available by the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC 20402.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
Section 7805(b)(1)(A) and (B) of the
Code generally provide that no
temporary, proposed, or final regulation
relating to the internal revenue laws
may apply to any taxable period ending
before the earliest of (A) the date on
which such regulation is filed with the
Federal Register, or (B) in the case of a
final regulation, the date on which a
proposed or temporary regulation to
which the final regulation relates was
filed with the Federal Register.
The amendments to §§ 1.199A–3 and
1.199A–6 set forth in this notice of
proposed rulemaking generally are
proposed to apply to taxable years
ending after the date of publication of a
Treasury decision adopting these rules
as final regulations in the Federal
Register. However, taxpayers may rely
on the rules in the amendments to
§§ 1.199A–3 and 1.199A–6 set forth in
this notice of proposed rulemaking, in
their entirety, until the date a Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as
final regulations is published in the
Federal Register.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review—
Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
3020
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
The proposed regulations have been
designated by the Office of Management
and Budget’s (‘‘OMB’’) Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(‘‘OIRA’’) as subject to review under
Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11,
2018) between the Treasury Department
and OMB regarding review of tax
regulations. It has been determined that
the proposed rulemaking is
economically significant under section
1(c) of the Memorandum of Agreement
and thereby subject to review.
Accordingly, the proposed regulations
have been reviewed by OMB.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
A. Overview
Congress enacted section 199A to
provide taxpayers other than
corporations a deduction of up to 20
percent of QBI from domestic
businesses plus up to 20 percent of their
combined qualified REIT dividends and
qualified PTP income. As stated in the
Explanation of Provisions, these
regulations are necessary to provide
taxpayers with computational,
definitional, and anti-avoidance
guidance regarding the application of
section 199A. These proposed
regulations contain amendments to
§ 1.199A–3, providing further guidance
to taxpayers for purposes of calculating
the section 199A deduction. They
provide clarity for taxpayers in
determining their eligibility for the
deduction and the amount of the
allowed deduction. Among other
benefits, this clarity helps ensure that
taxpayers all calculate the deduction in
a similar manner, which encourages
decision-making that is economically
efficient contingent on the provisions of
the overall Code.
B. Baseline
The analysis in this section compares
the proposed regulation to a no-action
baseline reflecting anticipated Federal
income tax-related behavior in the
absence of these regulations.
C. Economic Analysis of the Proposed
Amendments to § 1.199A–3
1. Background
Because the section 199A deduction
has not previously been available,
§§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–6 provide
greater specificity for a large number of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
the relevant terms and necessary
calculations taxpayers are currently
required to apply under the statute.
However, one subject not covered by the
August 2018 Proposed Regulations is
the treatment of REIT dividends
received by RICs. Because RICs are
taxed as C corporations, they are
ineligible for the section 199A
deduction under the statute, which
generally does not apply to C
corporations. However, the statute also
directs the Secretary to prescribe such
regulations as are necessary to carry out
the purposes of section 199A, including
regulations for its application in the
case of tiered entities. Thus these
proposed regulations establish rules
under which a RIC that earns qualified
REIT dividends may pay section 199A
dividends to its shareholders.
An alternative approach the Treasury
Department and the IRS could have
taken would be to remain silent on this
issue. For reasons given below, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
concluded such an approach would
likely give rise to less economically
efficient decisions than the approach
taken in these proposed regulations.
2. Anticipated Benefits of the Proposed
Amendments to § 1.199A–3
The Treasury Department and the IRS
expect that the definitions and guidance
provided in the proposed amendments
to § 1.199A–3 will implement the
section 199A deduction in an
economically efficient manner. An
economically efficient tax system
generally aims to treat income derived
from similar economic decisions
similarly in order to reduce incentives
to make choices based on tax rather than
market incentives. In absence of these
proposed regulations, the section 199A
statute would not accomplish this in the
case of REIT dividends. Under the
statute and the section 199A final
regulations, individuals who directly
hold ownership interests in a REIT
would generally qualify for the section
199A deduction on their qualified REIT
dividends. However, individuals who
are shareholders of a RIC that has an
ownership interest in a REIT would not
receive any benefit from section 199A
on REIT dividends received by the RIC,
even if the RIC pays dividends to the
individual. Thus, in the absence of these
supplemental proposed regulations, a
market distortion is introduced by
section 199A whereby direct ownership
of REITs is tax-advantaged relative to
indirect ownership of REITs through
RICs.
These proposed regulations remove
this distortion. The proposed
amendments to § 1.199A–3 establish
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
rules under which a RIC that earns
qualified REIT dividends may pay
section 199A dividends to its
shareholders, such that the effective tax
treatment of qualified REIT dividends is
similar under the proposed regulations
regardless of whether a taxpayer invests
in a REIT directly or through a RIC.
3. Anticipated Costs of the Proposed
Amendments to § 1.199A–3
The Treasury Department and the IRS
do not anticipate any meaningful
economic distortions to be induced by
the proposed amendments to § 1.199A–
3 because the proposed amendments
seek to continue to provide similar tax
treatment to REIT income regardless of
whether it is held directly or through a
RIC. Prior to TCJA, the tax treatment
was similar, but TCJA made REIT
dividends eligible for the section 199A
deduction, and the section 199A final
regulations did not address this
uncertainty. This proposed amendment
ensures that REIT income earned
through a RIC is also eligible for the
same deduction. RICs are financial
intermediaries, and, as a general rule,
economic distortion is minimized to the
extent that the tax consequences of
investment through an intermediary
correspond to the tax consequences of
direct investment. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments regarding any anticipated
economic costs. Changes to the
collective paperwork burden arising
from this and other sections of these
regulations are discussed in section D,
Anticipated impacts on administrative
and compliance costs, of this analysis.
D. Anticipated Impacts on
Administrative and Compliance Costs
The proposed regulations add to the
compliance costs of RICs and
intermediaries such as brokerage firms
that hold RIC shares. In order for a RIC’s
shareholders to benefit from the section
199A deduction on qualified REIT
dividends earned by the RIC, the
proposed regulations require the RIC to
compute and report section 199A
dividends to its shareholders. Though
many RICs keep detailed records of their
investment portfolios, this action
nonetheless creates non-trivial
administrative costs for any RICs and
intermediaries that wish to provide
section 199A dividends to their
shareholders. These costs and the
associated impacted tax forms are
described in the Paperwork Reduction
Act section of this proposed
amendment.
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
3021
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
E. Executive Order 13771
These regulations have been
designated as regulatory under E.O.
13771.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information required
by this proposed regulation is in
proposed § 1.199A–3. The collection of
information in proposed § 1.199A–3 is
required for RICs that choose to report
information regarding qualified REIT
dividends to their shareholders. It is
necessary to report the information to
the IRS and relevant taxpayers in order
to ensure that taxpayers properly report
in accordance with the rules of the
proposed regulations the correct amount
of deduction under section 199A. The
collection of information in proposed
§ 1.199A–3 is satisfied by providing
information about section 199A
dividends as Form 1099–DIV and its
instructions may prescribe.
For purpose of the PRA, the reporting
burden associated with § 1.199A–3 will
be reflected in the IRS Form 14029,
Paperwork Reduction Act Submission,
associated with Form 1099–DIV (OMB
control number 1545–0110). The burden
associated with the information
collection in the proposed regulations
represents 1.567 million hours and $149
million ($2018) annually to comply
with the information collection
requirement in the proposed
regulations. The burden hours estimate
was derived from IRS’s legacy burden
model and is discussed in further detail
on 1545–0110. The hourly rate is
derived from RAAS’s Business Taxpayer
Burden model that relates time and outof-pocket costs of business tax
preparation, derived from survey data,
to assets and receipts of affected
taxpayers along with other relevant
variables, and converted by the Treasury
Department to $2017. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of information
collection burdens related to the
proposed regulations. In addition, when
available, drafts of the applicable IRS
forms are posted for comment at https://
www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099div.pdf.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that the
collections of information in proposed
§ 1.199A–3 will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The collection in proposed § 1.199A–
3 applies only to RICs that pay section
199A dividends. As described above,
Congress created RICs to give small
investors access to the professional
management and asset diversification
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
that are available only with very large
investment portfolios. To insure
appropriate non-tax regulation of these
substantial investment portfolios,
subchapter M of chapter 1 of subtitle A
the Code requires that such RICs must
be eligible for registration, and must
actually be registered, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
under the Investment Company Act of
1940. There are some small businesses
that are publicly traded, but most
publicly traded businesses are not small
entities as defined by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Thus, the Treasury
Department and IRS expect that most
RICs are not small entities for purposes
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS have determined that the
collection of information in this notice
of proposed rulemaking will not have a
significant economic impact.
Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is
not required. Notwithstanding this
certification, the Treasury Department
and the IRS invite comments from
interested members of the public on
both the number of entities affected and
the economic impact on small entities.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed rules.
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
comments that are submitted timely to
the IRS as prescribed in this preamble
under the ADDRESSES heading. All
comments will be available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request. A
public hearing will be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person that
timely submits written comments. If a
public hearing is scheduled, then notice
of the date, time, and place for the
public hearing will be published in the
Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Michael Y. Chin and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Steven Harrison, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
and Products) and Robert Alinsky,
Vishal R. Amin, Margaret Burow, and
Frank J. Fisher, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries). However, other
personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citations
for part 1 are revised by amending
sectional authorities for §§ 1.199A–3
and 1.199A–6 to read in part as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.199A–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(c)(4)(C) and (f)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1.199A–6 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(f)(1)(B) and (f)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 2. Section 1.199A–0 is amended
by:
■ 1. Adding entries for § 1.199A–
3(b)(1)(iv)(A) and (B).
■ 2. Adding entries for § 1.199A–3(d),
(d)(1) and (2), (d)(2)(i) through (iii),
(d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B), (d)(3), (d)(3)(i)
through (v), (d)(4), (d)(4)(i) and (ii), and
(d)(5) and (6).
■ 3. Adding entries for § 1.199A–
6(d)(3)(iii) and (v).
The additions read as follows:
■
§ 1.199A–0
*
*
Table of contents.
*
*
*
§ 1.199A–3 Qualified business income,
qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP
income.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) In general.
(B) Attributes of disallowed loss
determined in year loss is incurred.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a
regulated investment company.
(1) In general.
(2) Definition of section 199A
dividend.
(i) In general.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess
reported amounts.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported
amount.
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
3022
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(A) In general.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year
RICs.
(3) Definitions.
(i) Reported section 199A dividend
amount.
(ii) Excess reported amount.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount.
(iv) Post-December reported amount.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A
dividends by shareholders.
(i) In general.
(ii) Holding period.
(5) Example.
(6) Applicability date.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.199A–6 Relevant passthrough entities
(RPEs), publicly traded partnerships (PTPs),
trusts, and estates.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Charitable remainder trusts.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 3. Section 1.199A–3 is amended
by revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv) and
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 1.199A–3 Qualified business income,
qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP
income.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
ll(1) * * *
(iv) Previously disallowed losses—(A)
In general. Previously disallowed losses
or deductions (including losses
disallowed under sections 465, 469,
704(d), and 1366(d)) allowed in the
taxable year generally are taken into
account for purposes of computing QBI
to the extent the disallowed loss or
deduction is otherwise allowed by
section 199A and this section. These
losses shall be used, for purposes of
section 199A and these regulations, in
order from the oldest to the most recent
on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and
shall be treated as losses from a separate
trade or business. To the extent such
losses relate to a PTP, they must be
treated as a loss from a separate PTP in
the taxable year the losses are taken into
account. However, losses or deductions
that were disallowed, suspended,
limited, or carried over from taxable
years ending before January 1, 2018
(including under sections 465, 469,
704(d), and 1366(d)), are not taken into
account in a later taxable year for
purposes of computing QBI.
(B) Attributes of disallowed loss
determined in year loss is incurred.
Whether a disallowed loss or deduction
is attributable to a trade or business, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
otherwise meets the requirements of this
section is determined in the year the
loss is incurred. Whether a disallowed
loss or deduction is attributable to a
specified service trade or business
(including whether an individual has
taxable income under the threshold
amount, within the phase-in range, or in
excess of the phase-in range) also is
determined in the year the loss is
incurred. To the extent a loss is partially
disallowed, QBI in the year of
disallowance must be reduced
proportionately.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a
regulated investment company—(1) In
general. If section 852(b) applies to a
regulated investment company (RIC) for
a taxable year, the RIC may pay section
199A dividends, as defined in this
paragraph (d).
(2) Definition of section 199A
dividend—(i) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this
section, a section 199A dividend is any
dividend or part of such a dividend that
a RIC pays to its shareholders and
reports as a section 199A dividend in
written statements furnished to its
shareholders.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess
reported amounts. If the aggregate
reported amount with respect to the RIC
for any taxable year exceeds the RIC’s
qualified REIT dividend income for the
taxable year, then a section 199A
dividend is equal to—
(A) The reported section 199A
dividend amount, reduced by;
(B) The excess reported amount that
is allocable to that reported section
199A dividend amount.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported
amount—(A) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(B) of
this section, the excess reported amount
(if any) that is allocable to the reported
section 199A dividend amount is that
portion of the excess reported amount
that bears the same ratio to the excess
reported amount as the reported section
199A dividend amount bears to the
aggregate reported amount.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year
RICs. In the case of any taxable year that
does not begin and end in the same
calendar year, if the post-December
reported amount equals or exceeds the
excess reported amount for that taxable
year, paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section is applied by substituting ‘‘postDecember reported amount’’ for
‘‘aggregate reported amount,’’ and no
excess reported amount is allocated to
any dividend paid on or before
December 31 of that taxable year.
(3) Definitions. For purposes of
paragraph (d) of this section—
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(i) Reported section 199A dividend
amount. The term reported section 199A
dividend amount means the amount of
a dividend distribution reported to the
RIC’s shareholders under paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section as a section 199A
dividend.
(ii) Excess reported amount. The term
excess reported amount means the
excess of the aggregate reported amount
over the RIC’s qualified REIT dividend
income for the taxable year.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount. The
term aggregate reported amount means
the aggregate amount of dividends
reported by the RIC under paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section as section 199A
dividends for the taxable year
(including section 199A dividends paid
after the close of the taxable year and
described in section 855).
(iv) Post-December reported amount.
The term post-December reported
amount means the aggregate reported
amount determined by taking into
account only dividends paid after
December 31 of the taxable year.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income.
The term qualified REIT dividend
income means, with respect to a taxable
year of a RIC, the excess of the amount
of qualified REIT dividends, as defined
in § 1.199A–3(c)(2), includible in the
RIC’s taxable income for the taxable year
over the amount of the RIC’s deductions
that are properly allocable to such
income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A
dividends by shareholders—(i) In
general. For purposes of section 199A
and the regulations under section 199A,
a section 199A dividend is treated by a
taxpayer that receives the section 199A
dividend as a qualified REIT dividend.
(ii) Holding period. Paragraph (d)(4)(i)
does not apply to any dividend received
with respect to a share of RIC stock—
(A) That is held by the shareholder for
45 days or less (taking into account the
principles of section 246(c)(3) and (4))
during the 91-day period beginning on
the date which is 45 days before the
date on which the share becomes exdividend with respect to such dividend;
or
(B) To the extent that the shareholder
is under an obligation (whether
pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to
make related payments with respect to
positions in substantially similar or
related property.
(5) Example. The following example
illustrates the provisions of this
paragraph (d).
(i) Example. (A) X is a corporation that has
elected to be a RIC. For its taxable year
ending March 31, 2019, X has $25,000x of net
long-term capital gain, $60,000x of qualified
dividend income, $25,000x of taxable interest
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2
income, $15,000x of net short-term capital
gain, and $25,000x of qualified REIT
dividends. X has $15,000x of deductible
expenses, of which $3,000x is allocable to the
qualified REIT dividends. On December 31,
2018, X pays a single dividend of $100,000x
on December 31, and reports $20,000x of the
dividend as a section 199A dividend in
written statements to its shareholders. On
March 31, 2019, X pays a dividend of
$35,000x, and reports $5,000x of the
dividend as a section 199A dividend in
written statements to its shareholders.
(B) X’s qualified REIT dividend income
under paragraph (d)(3)(v) of this section is
$22,000x, which is the excess of X’s $25,000x
of qualified REIT dividends over $3,000x in
allocable expenses. The reported section
199A dividend amounts for the December 31,
2018, and March 31, 2019, distributions are
$20,000x and $5,000x, respectively. For the
taxable year ending March 31, 2019, the
aggregate reported amount of section 199A
dividends is $25,000x, and the excess
reported amount under paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of
this section is $3,000x. Because X is a
noncalendar-year RIC and the post-December
reported amount of $5,000x exceeds the
excess reported amount of $3,000x, the entire
excess reported amount is allocated under
paragraphs (d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B) of this
section to the reported section 199A
dividend amount for the March 31, 2019,
distribution. No portion of the excess
reported amount is allocated to the reported
section 199A dividend amount for the
December 31, 2018, distribution. Thus, the
section 199A dividend on March 31, 2019, is
$2,000x, which is the reported section 199A
dividend amount of $5,000x reduced by the
$3,000x of allocable excess reported amount.
The section 199A dividend on December 31,
2018, is the $20,000x that X reports as a
section 199A dividend.
(C) Shareholder A, a United States person,
receives a dividend from X of $100x on
December 31, 2018, of which $20x is
reported as a section 199A dividend. If A
meets the holding period requirements in
paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section with
respect to the stock of X, A treats $20x of the
dividend from X as a qualified REIT dividend
for purposes of section 199A for A’s 2018
taxable year.
(D) A receives a dividend from X of $35x
on March 31, 2019, of which $5x is reported
as a section 199A dividend. If A meets the
holding period requirements in paragraph
(d)(4)(ii) of this section with respect to the
stock of X, A may only treat $2x of the
dividend from X as a section 199A dividend
for A’s 2019 taxable year.
(6) Applicability date. The provisions
of paragraph (d) of this section apply to
taxable years ending after the date the
Treasury decision adopting these
regulations as final regulations is
published in the Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Feb 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
However, taxpayers may rely on the
rules of this section until the date the
Treasury decision adopting these
regulations as final regulations is
published in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 4. Section 1.199A–6 is amended
by adding paragraphs (d)(3)(iii) and (v)
to read as follows:
§ 1.199A–6 Relevant passthrough entities
(RPEs), publicly traded partnerships (PTPs),
trusts, and estates.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares. In the case of a
trust described in section 663(c) with
substantially separate and independent
shares for multiple beneficiaries, such
trust will be treated as a single trust for
purposes of determining whether the
taxable income of the trust exceeds the
threshold amount.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Charitable remainder trusts. A
charitable remainder trust described in
section 664 is not entitled to and does
not calculate a section 199A deduction
and the threshold amount described in
section 199A(e)(2) does not apply to the
trust. However, any taxable recipient of
a unitrust or annuity amount from the
trust must determine and apply the
recipient’s own threshold amount for
purposes of section 199A taking into
account any annuity or unitrust
amounts received from the trust. A
recipient of a unitrust or annuity
amount from a trust may take into
account QBI, qualified REIT dividends,
or qualified PTP income for purposes of
determining the recipient’s section
199A deduction for the taxable year to
the extent that the unitrust or annuity
amount distributed to such recipient
consists of such section 199A items
under § 1.664–1(d). For example, if a
charitable remainder trust has
investment income of $500, qualified
dividend income of $200, and qualified
REIT dividends of $1,000, and
distributes $1,000 to the recipient, the
trust would be treated as having income
in two classes within the category of
income described in § 1.664–
1(d)(1)(i)(a)(1), for purposes of § 1.664–
1(d)(1)(ii)(b). Because the annuity
amount first carries out income in the
class subject to the highest income tax
rate, the entire annuity payment comes
from the class with the investment
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
3023
income and qualified REIT dividends.
Thus, the charitable remainder trust
would be treated as distributing a
proportionate amount of the investment
income ($500/(1,000+500)*1,000 =
$333) and qualified REIT dividends
($1000/(1,000+500)*1000 = $667)
because the investment income and
qualified REIT dividends are taxed at
the same rate and within the same class,
which is higher than the rate of tax for
the qualified dividend income which is
in a separate class. The charitable
remainder trust in this example would
not be treated as distributing any of the
qualified dividend income until it
distributed all of the investment income
and qualified REIT dividends (more
than $1,500 in total) to the recipient. To
the extent that a trust is treated as
distributing QBI, qualified REIT
dividends, or qualified PTP income to
more than one unitrust or annuity
recipient in the taxable year, the
distribution of such income will be
treated as made to the recipients
proportionately, based on their
respective shares of the total of QBI,
qualified REIT dividends, or qualified
PTP income distributed for that year.
The trust allocates and reports any W–
2 wages or UBIA of qualified property
to the taxable recipient of the annuity or
unitrust interest based on each
recipient’s share of the trust’s total QBI
(whether or not distributed) for that
taxable year. Accordingly, if 10 percent
of the QBI of a charitable remainder
trust is distributed to the recipient and
90 percent of the QBI is retained by the
trust, 10 percent of the W–2 wages and
UBIA of qualified property is allocated
and reported to the recipient and 90
percent of the W–2 wages and UBIA of
qualified property is treated as retained
by the trust. However, any W–2 wages
retained by the trust do not carry over
to subsequent taxable years for section
199A purposes. Any QBI, qualified REIT
dividends, or qualified PTP income of
the trust that is unrelated business
taxable income is subject to excise tax
and that tax must be allocated to the
corpus of the trust under § 1.664–1(c).
*
*
*
*
*
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2019–01023 Filed 2–4–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\08FEP2.SGM
08FEP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3015-3023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01023]
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3015]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-134652-18]
RIN 1545-BP12
Qualified Business Income Deduction
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations concerning the
deduction for qualified business income under section 199A of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). The proposed regulations will affect
certain individuals, partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and estates.
The proposed regulations provide guidance on the treatment of
previously suspended losses that constitute qualified business income.
The proposed regulations also provide guidance on the determination of
the section 199A deduction for taxpayers that hold interests in
regulated investment companies, charitable remainder trusts, and split-
interest trusts.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by April 9, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic submissions to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-134652-18) by
following the online instructions for submitting comments. Once
submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited
or withdrawn. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and
the IRS will publish for public availability any comment received to
its public docket, whether submitted electronically or in hard copy.
Send hard copy submissions to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-134652-18), Room 5203,
Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
134652-18), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning Sec. 1.199A-3(d), Michael
Y. Chin or Steven Harrison at (202) 317-6842; concerning Sec. Sec.
1.199A-3(b) and 1.199A-6, Vishal R. Amin or Frank J. Fisher at (202)
317-6850 or Robert D. Alinsky or Margaret Burow at 202-317-5279;
concerning submissions of comments or requests for a public hearing,
Regina Johnson at (202) 317-6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 199A of the Code.
Section 199A was enacted on December 22, 2017, by section 11011 of
``An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of
the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018,'' Public
Law 115-97 (TCJA), and was amended on March 23, 2018, retroactively to
January 1, 2018, by section 101 of Division T of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2018, Public Law 115-141, (2018 Act). Section 199A
applies to taxable years beginning after 2017 and before 2026.
Section 199A provides a deduction of up to 20 percent of qualified
business income from a U.S. trade or business operated as a sole
proprietorship or through a partnership, S corporation, trust, or
estate (section 199A deduction). The section 199A deduction may be
taken by individuals and by some estates and trusts. A section 199A
deduction is not available for wage income or for income earned by a C
corporation. For taxpayers whose taxable income exceeds a statutorily-
defined amount (threshold amount), section 199A may limit the
taxpayer's section 199A deduction based on (i) the type of trade or
business engaged in by the taxpayer, (ii) the amount of W-2 wages paid
with respect to the trade or business (W-2 wages), and/or (iii) the
unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified
property held for use in the trade or business (UBIA of qualified
property). These statutory limitations are subject to phase-in rules
based upon taxable income above the threshold amount.
Section 199A also allows individuals and some trusts and estates
(but not corporations) a deduction of up to 20 percent of their
combined qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and
qualified publicly traded partnership (PTP) income, including qualified
REIT dividends and qualified PTP income earned through passthrough
entities. This component of the section 199A deduction is not limited
by W-2 wages or UBIA of qualified property.
The section 199A deduction is the lesser of (1) the sum of the
combined amounts described in the prior two paragraphs or (2) an amount
equal to 20 percent of the excess (if any) of taxable income of the
taxpayer for the taxable year over the net capital gain of the taxpayer
for the taxable year.
Additionally, section 199A(g) provides that specified agricultural
or horticultural cooperatives may claim a special entity-level
deduction that is substantially similar to the domestic production
activities deduction under former section 199.
The statute expressly grants the Secretary authority to prescribe
such regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of section
199A (section 199A(f)(4)), and also provides specific grants of
authority with respect to certain issues: The treatment of
acquisitions, dispositions, and short-tax years (section 199A(b)(5));
certain payments to partners for services rendered in a non-partner
capacity (section 199A(c)(4)(C)); the allocation of W-2 wages and UBIA
of qualified property (section 199A(f)(1)(A)(iii)); restricting the
allocation of items and wages under section 199A and such reporting
requirements as the Secretary determines appropriate (section
199A(f)(4)(A)); the application of section 199A in the case of tiered
entities (section 199A(f)(4)(B); preventing the manipulation of the
depreciable period of qualified property using transactions between
related parties (section 199A(h)(1)); and determining the UBIA of
qualified property acquired in like-kind exchanges or involuntary
conversions (section 199A(h)(2)).
The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service published
proposed regulations interpreting section 199A on August 16, 2018 (the
August Proposed Regulations) (83 FR 40884). The August Proposed
Regulations contain six substantive sections, Sec. Sec. 1.199A-1
through 1.199A-6, each of which provides rules relevant to the
calculation of the section 199A deduction. The August Proposed
Regulations, with modifications in response to comments and testimony
received, were adopted as final regulations in TD 9847, issued
concurrently with this notice of proposed rulemaking and published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
Explanation of Provisions
These proposed regulations propose rules addressing issues not
addressed in the August Proposed Regulations that are necessary to
provide taxpayers with computational, definitional, and anti-avoidance
guidance regarding the application of section 199A. Specifically, these
proposed regulations contain amendments to two substantive sections of
the August Proposed
[[Page 3016]]
Regulations, Sec. Sec. 1.199A-3 and 1.199A-6, each of which provides
rules relevant to the calculation of the section 199A deduction. These
additional proposed rules respond to comments received on the August
Proposed Regulations as well as address certain issues identified after
additional study. This Explanation of Provisions describes each of the
proposed rules contained in this document in turn. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of these
proposed regulations.
I. Treatment of Previously Suspended Losses That Constitute QBI
Section 1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv) of the final regulations provides that
previously disallowed losses or deductions (including under sections
465, 469, 704(d), and 1366(d)) allowed in the taxable year are
generally taken into account for purposes of computing QBI except to
the extent the losses or deductions were disallowed, suspended,
limited, or carried over from taxable years ending before January 1,
2018. The final regulations also provide a first-in-first-out ordering
rule. One commenter on the August Proposed Regulations suggested that a
special rule should be provided to identify the section 469 trade or
business losses that are used to offset income if the taxpayer's
section 469 groupings differ from the taxpayer's section 199A
aggregations. The commenter recommended that any section 469 loss
carryforward that is later used should be allocated across the
taxpayer's section 199A aggregations based on income with respect to
such aggregations in the year the loss was generated.
The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that that previously
disallowed losses should be treated as losses from a separate trade or
business for both the reasons stated by the commenter and because the
losses may relate to a trade or business that is no longer in
existence. Accordingly, these proposed regulations amend Sec. 1.199A-
3(b)(1)(iv) to provide that such losses are treated as loss from a
separate trade or business. To the extent that losses relate to a PTP,
they must be treated as losses from a separate PTP. Section 1.199A-
3(b)(1)(iv)(B) provides that attributes of the disallowed loss are
determined in the year the loss is incurred.
II. Regulated Investment Companies With Interests in REITs and PTPs
A. REITs
Section 1.199A-3 restates the definitions in section 199A(c) and
provides additional guidance on the determination of QBI, qualified
REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income. For simplicity, the
regulations use the term individual when referring to an individual,
trust, estate, or other person eligible to claim the section 199A
deduction. See Sec. 1.199A-1(a)(2). The term relevant passthrough
entity (RPE) is used to describe passthrough entities that directly
operate the trade or business or pass through the trade or business'
items of income, gain, loss, or deduction from lower-tier RPEs to the
individual. See Sec. 1.199A-1(b)(10).
A number of commenters on the August Proposed Regulations requested
guidance that would allow a shareholder in a regulated investment
company within the meaning of section 851(a) (RIC) to take a section
199A deduction with respect to certain income of, or distributions
from, the RIC. Because a RIC is a subchapter C corporation, a
shareholder in a RIC generally does not take into account a share of
the RIC's items of income, deduction, gain, or loss. Part 1 of
subchapter M, however, has features that allow the tax consequences of
investing in a RIC to approximate those of a direct investment in the
assets of the RIC. The principal feature is the allowance of the
deduction for dividends paid under section 852(b)(2)(D). If a
corporation qualifies as a RIC under section 851 and meets the
distribution requirements and other requirements in section 852(a), the
RIC's income tax is computed on its investment company taxable income
(ICTI), which is its taxable income with certain adjustments, including
the allowance of the deduction for dividends paid. See section
852(b)(2). ICTI also excludes the amount of the RIC's net capital gain,
but tax is separately imposed on that amount to the extent it exceeds
the deduction for dividends paid, taking into account only capital gain
dividends. See section 852(b)(3)(A). The deduction for dividends paid
allows RICs to eliminate all or most of their corporate income tax
liability.
If a RIC has certain items of income or gain, subchapter M also
provides rules under which a RIC may pay dividends that a shareholder
in the RIC may treat in the same manner (or a similar manner) as the
shareholder would treat the underlying item of income or gain if the
shareholder realized it directly. Although this treatment differs
fundamentally from the pass-through treatment of partners or trust
beneficiaries, this preamble refers to is as ``conduit treatment.'' For
example, under section 852(b)(3), a RIC that has net capital gain for a
taxable year generally may pay capital gain dividends, and shareholders
receiving the capital gain dividends treat them as gain from the sale
or exchange of a capital asset held for more than one year. Section
852(b)(3) provides necessary limits and procedures that apply to
capital gain dividends. There are similar statutory provisions for
exempt-interest dividends under section 852(b)(5), interest-related
dividends under section 871(k)(1), short-term capital gain dividends
under section 871(k)(2), dividends eligible for the dividends received
deduction under section 854(b)(1)(A), and qualified dividend income
under section 854(b)(1)(B). Rules for paying dividends corresponding to
different types of long-term capital gain have been provided in
guidance under regulatory authority granted in section 1(h). See Notice
2015-41, 2015-24 I.R.B. 1058, modifying Notice 2004-39, 2004-1 C.B. 982
and Notice 97-64, 1997-2 C.B. 323.
Investing in RICs enables small investors to gain benefits, such as
professional management and broad diversification, that otherwise would
be available only to investors with more resources. The House Report
for the enactment of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 explained that
the RIC regime ``permits investors to pool their funds through the use
of a corporation in order to obtain skilled, diversified investment in
corporate securities without having to pay an additional layer of
corporate tax.'' H.R. Rep. No. 83-1337, p. 73 (1954). The ability to
elect to be taxed as a RIC is available typically only to domestic
corporations that, at all times during the taxable year, are registered
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a-1
to 80b-2). See section 851(a)(1)(A).
Section 199A(f)(4) directs the Secretary to prescribe such
regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of section 199A,
including regulations for its application in the case of tiered
entities. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that it
is consistent with the grant of authority under section 199A and the
purposes of part 1 of subchapter M of chapter 1 of the Code to provide
for conduit treatment of qualified REIT dividends. The Treasury
Department and the IRS continue to consider whether it is appropriate
to provide for conduit treatment of qualified PTP income.
These proposed regulations provide rules under which a RIC that
receives qualified REIT dividends may pay section 199A dividends. Non-
corporate shareholders receiving section 199A dividends would treat
them as qualified
[[Page 3017]]
REIT dividends under section 199A(e)(3), provided the shareholder meets
the holding period requirements for its shares in the RIC.
The rules under which a RIC would compute and report section 199A
dividends are based on the rules for capital gain dividends in section
852(b)(3) and exempt-interest dividends in section 852(b)(5). The
amount of a RIC's section 199A dividends for a taxable year would be
limited to the excess of the RIC's qualified REIT dividends for the
taxable year over allocable expenses. Section 199A dividends generally
are also subject to the principles that apply to other RIC dividends.
See, e.g., Rev. Rul. 2005-31, 2005-1 C.B. 1084; Rev. Rul. 89-81, 1989-1
C.B. 226.
B. PTPs
One of the commenters recommending that the regulations permit
conduit treatment for qualified REIT dividends received by a RIC also
recommended that the regulations permit conduit treatment for qualified
PTP income received by a RIC. In response to this comment, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have given significant consideration to
including in this notice of proposed rulemaking regulations that would
provide conduit treatment for qualified PTP income. However, unlike
conduit treatment for qualified REIT dividends received by a RIC,
conduit treatment of qualified PTP income received by a RIC presents
several novel issues. The commenter recommending this conduit treatment
did not address these issues or make any suggestions as to how they
should be resolved. The need to resolve these issues in a way that
would afford RIC shareholders treatment that is similar to the
treatment they would receive if they held the PTP interests directly
while preserving the relative simplicity of the tax treatment of RIC
investors has prevented the Treasury Department and the IRS from
crafting and including appropriate rules in these proposed regulations.
As noted later in this part of the Explanation of Provisions, the
Treasury Department and the IRS continue to consider permitting conduit
treatment for qualified PTP income received by a RIC to further the
purposes of section 199A(b)(1)(B) and seek public comment to assist in
resolving these novel issues with a view to developing regulations
permitting conduit treatment for qualified PTP income.
These issues arise in part from the fact that income attributable
to a specified service trade or business within the meaning of section
199A(d)(2) (SSTB) of a PTP may be qualified PTP income for taxpayers
with taxable income below the threshold amount, but not for taxpayers
with taxable income above the top of the phase-out range. For taxpayers
with taxable income in the phase-out range, a portion of PTP income
attributable to an SSTB is qualified PTP income. There is no precedent
for providing conduit treatment for a RIC (or any other C corporation)
with respect to income of a PTP or other partnership taxed in this
manner, and the complexity and potential confusion such treatment might
create for RIC investors is arguably inconsistent with the relative
simplicity that the tax system has historically provided for RIC
investors. This is particularly true given the limitation on the
portion of a RIC's assets that can be invested in qualified PTPs as
defined in section 851(h) (the type of PTP likely to be engaged in a
trade or business) and the limited portion of the RIC's dividends that
would likely be attributable to income from such PTPs.
Another novel issue is presented by the rules relating to the
treatment of losses for purposes of section 199A. First, a PTP may not
net losses from an SSTB against income from a non-SSTB, and vice versa,
in determining the amounts that it reports to its partners. Thus, PTPs
are required to separately calculate income and deductions from SSTBs
and non-SSTBs and report that information to their partners. Second, if
a taxpayer has a net loss from an SSTB or a non-SSTB that is allowed in
determining taxable income for a taxable year, that loss may be
required to be carried over to the subsequent year for section 199A
attribute purposes. In the case of a RIC, it is not clear to what
extent these requirements can be implemented by permitting RIC
dividends to reflect attributes of the RIC's investment experiences in
PTPs. For example, it is difficult to conceive how losses of a RIC can
be passed through to shareholders upon the payment of a dividend, which
would be inconsistent with the status of a RIC as a C corporation. See
section 311(a). In addition, RICs and RIC shareholders would experience
complexity inconsistent with the longstanding tax policy of providing
simplified reporting for RIC investors.
Consistent with RICs' status as C corporations, RICs could instead
offset losses from PTPs against qualified REIT dividends received, with
any excess PTP losses carried forward as negative qualified PTP income
for section 199A attribute purposes at the RIC level. To the extent
RICs would be required to carry forward PTP losses, it would appear
that RICs would need to track separate loss carryforwards for SSTB PTP
losses and non-SSTB PTP losses. While netting qualified non-SSTB losses
from PTPs against larger amounts of qualified REIT dividends would
support RIC dividends that could be treated as eligible for the section
199A deduction by the RICs' shareholders regardless of income level,
SSTB losses from PTPs would complicate the offset of qualified PTP
losses against qualified REIT dividends by RICs because SSTB losses
from a PTP do not offset qualified REIT dividends for taxpayers with
taxable income above the phase-out range. Such losses do, however,
offset qualified REIT dividends for taxpayers with income below the
threshold amount. For taxpayers with income in the phase-out range,
these losses partially offset qualified REIT dividends to a greater or
lesser extent depending on where the taxpayer's income falls in the
phase-out range. It is not clear how a conduit regime for qualified PTP
income could work in terms of treating RIC shareholders in the phase-
out range in a manner that is consistent with the treatment they would
receive if they received the qualified REIT dividend and the qualified
PTP loss from an SSTB directly rather than through a RIC.
Providing conduit treatment for qualified PTP income would also
raise potentially significant issues with respect to the treatment of
RIC shareholders that are non-U.S. persons, tax-exempt organizations,
and trusts underlying individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and
qualified retirement plans. In order to be qualified PTP income,
section 199A(c)(3)(A)(i) requires that the income must be effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business. If conduit treatment is
afforded to RIC dividends attributable to such PTP income for section
199A purposes, it is not clear that a RIC dividend attributable to such
income could be disregarded for purposes of calculating effectively
connected income of a non-U.S. shareholder or unrelated business
taxable income of a tax-exempt organization or trust underlying an IRA
or qualified retirement plan. Given that such investors typically do
not hold directly interests in PTPs intentionally, but do so through
corporate ``blockers,'' allowing conduit treatment for qualified PTP
income through RICs could cause unwelcome results for non-U.S.
shareholders, tax-exempt organizations, and trusts underlying IRAs and
qualified retirement plans holding RIC stock.
[[Page 3018]]
The Treasury Department and the IRS continue to evaluate whether it
is appropriate to provide conduit treatment for qualified PTP income
through RICs, and request detailed comments on these novel issues. In
particular, comments are requested concerning: (1) Whether RICs have
sufficient qualified items of PTP income, gain, deduction, or loss to
warrant a conduit regime that would permit RICs to pay qualified PTP
dividends to shareholders; (2) How to provide conduit treatment for
qualified PTP income for taxpayers with income below the threshold
amount or within the phase-out range, particularly where a RIC has
qualified REIT dividends and a qualified PTP loss from an SSTB; (3) How
to treat losses of PTPs arising from SSTBs and non-SSTBs; (4) Whether
conduit treatment for qualified PTP income can be disregarded for
purposes of determining the effectively connected income or unrelated
business taxable income of certain RIC shareholders; (5) Whether SSTB
items are sufficiently rare or incidental for PTPs that a conduit
regime for PTP dividends should exclude all SSTB items; and (6) How to
implement conduit treatment for qualified PTP income in a way that is
consistent with the policy goal of preserving the overall relative
simplicity of the tax treatment of investors in RICs while still
achieving the policy goals of section 199A and section 199A(b)(1)(B) in
particular.
III. Special Rules for Trusts and Estates
Section 1.199A-6 provides guidance that certain specified entities
(for example, trusts and estates) may need to follow to enable the
computation of the section 199A deduction of the entity and each of its
owners. Section 1.199A-6(d) contains special rules for applying section
199A to trusts and decedents' estates. The August Proposed Regulations
expressly requested comments, and comments were submitted, on whether
and how certain trusts and other entities would be able to take a
deduction under section 199A. These proposed regulations take those
suggestions into consideration in proposing rules applicable to those
particular situations identified by commenters.
In the case of a section 199A deduction claimed by a non-grantor
trust or estate, section 199A(f)(1)(B) applies rules similar to the
rules under former section 199(d)(1)(B)(i) for the apportionment of W-2
wages and the apportionment of UBIA of qualified property. In the case
of a non-grantor trust or estate, the QBI and expenses properly
allocable to the business, including the W-2 wages relevant to the
computation of the wage limitation, and relevant UBIA of depreciable
property must be allocated among the trust or estate and its various
beneficiaries. Specifically, Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(ii) provides that
each beneficiary's share of the trust's or estate's QBI and W-2 wages
is determined based on the proportion of the trust's or estate's DNI
that is deemed to be distributed to that beneficiary for that taxable
year. Similarly, the proportion of the entity's DNI that is not deemed
distributed by the trust or estate will determine the entity's share of
the QBI and W-2 wages. In addition, if the trust or estate has no DNI
in a particular taxable year, any QBI and W-2 wages are allocated to
the trust or estate, and not to any beneficiary.
In addition, Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(ii) provides that, to the extent
the trust's or estate's UBIA of qualified property is relevant to a
trust or estate and any beneficiary, the trust's or estate's UBIA of
qualified property will be allocated among the trust or estate and its
beneficiaries in the same proportions as is the DNI of the trust or
estate. This is the case regardless of how any depreciation or
depletion deductions resulting from the same property may be allocated
under section 643(c) among the trust or estate and its beneficiaries
for purposes other than section 199A.
Under Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(iv), the threshold amount is determined
at the trust level after taking into account any distribution
deductions. Commenters have noted that taxpayers could circumvent the
threshold amount by dividing assets among multiple trusts, each of
which would claim its own threshold amount. This result is
inappropriate and inconsistent with the purpose of section 199A.
Therefore, Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(vii) provides that a trust formed or
funded with a principal purpose of receiving a deduction under section
199A will not be respected for purposes of determining the threshold
amount under section 199A.
In the August Proposed Regulations, the Treasury Department and the
IRS requested comments with respect to whether taxable recipients of
annuity and unitrust interests in charitable remainder trusts and
taxable beneficiaries of other split-interest trusts may be eligible
for the section 199A deduction to the extent that the amounts received
by such recipients include amounts that may give rise to the deduction.
The request for such comments indicated that such comments should
include explanations of how amounts that may give rise to the section
199A deduction would be identified and reported in the various classes
of income of the trusts received by such recipients and how the excise
tax rules in section 664(c) would apply to such amounts.
A. Charitable Remainder Trust Beneficiary's Eligibility for the
Deduction
A few commenters suggested that a charitable remainder trust under
section 664 should be allowed to calculate the deduction at the trust
level and that the charitable remainder trust should be treated as a
single taxpayer for purposes of the thresholds for taxable income, W-2
wages, and UBIA of qualified property.
Several commenters recommended that, if unrelated business taxable
income (UBTI) is qualified business income, the section 199A deduction
should be allowed before the UBTI excise tax is imposed. However, other
commenters disagreed. Another commenter stated that the section 199A
deduction should not be allowed when calculating UBTI because it is not
a deduction directly connected with carrying on the trade or business
and is allowable only for purposes of chapter 1, while the excise tax
on UBTI is imposed under chapter 42 (that is, it is not an income tax).
Another commenter said the UBTI excise tax under section 664(c) should
not affect QBI because that tax is charged to principal.
One commenter recommended that QBI should be allocated to the
ordinary income tier. Another recommended that QBI should be the bottom
of the first tier (last to be distributed) and section 199A items
should be reported on the Schedule K-1 when QBI is deemed distributed.
Another commenter stated that a charitable remainder trust has no
taxable income and no DNI, so the allocation of QBI, W-2 wages, and
UBIA of qualified property should be allocated to beneficiaries based
on the percentage of distributions from the ordinary income tier, with
QBI allocated to the charitable remainder trust remaining a tier one
item. Another commenter stated that QBI cannot be a separate tier
because it is a deduction, rather than a rate difference.
The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that, because a
charitable remainder trust described in section 664 is not subject to
income tax, and because the excise tax imposed by section 664(c) is
treated as imposed under chapter 42, the trust does not either have or
calculate a section 199A deduction and the threshold amount described
in section 199A(e)(2) does not apply to the trust. Furthermore,
application of section 199A to
[[Page 3019]]
effectively reduce the 100 percent rate of tax imposed by section
664(c) on any UBTI would be inconsistent with the intent of section
664(c) to deter trusts from making investments that generate
significant UBTI. However, any taxable recipient of a unitrust or
annuity amount from the trust must determine and apply the recipient's
own threshold amount for purposes of section 199A, taking into account
any annuity or unitrust amounts received from the trust. Therefore, a
taxable recipient of a unitrust or annuity amount from a charitable
remainder trust may take into account QBI, qualified REIT dividends,
and qualified PTP income for purposes of determining the recipient's
section 199A deduction for the taxable year to the extent that the
unitrust or annuity amount distributed to such recipient consists of
such section 199A items under Sec. 1.664-1(d).
In order to determine the order of distribution of the various
classes of income of the trust for purposes of applying Sec. 1.664-
1(d), QBI, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income of a
charitable remainder trust will be allocated to the classes of income
within the category of income described in Sec. 1.664-1(d)(1)(i)(a)(1)
based on the rate of tax that normally would apply to that type of
income, not taking into account the characterization of that income as
QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP income for purposes of
section 199A. Accordingly, any QBI, qualified REIT dividends, and
qualified PTP income will be treated as distributed from the trust to a
unitrust or annuity recipient only when all other classes of income
within the ordinary income category subject to a higher rate of tax
(not taking into account section 199A) have been exhausted. The
unitrust or annuity recipient will be treated as receiving a
proportionate amount of any QBI, qualified REIT dividends, and
qualified PTP income that is distributed along with other income in the
same class within the ordinary income category. To the extent that a
trust is treated as distributing QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or
qualified PTP income to more than one unitrust or annuity recipient in
the taxable year, the distribution of such income will be treated as
made to the recipients proportionately, based on their respective
shares of the total of QBI, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP
income distributed for that year. The amount of any W-2 wages or UBIA
of qualified property of the charitable remainder trust in a taxable
year will be allocable to unitrust or annuity recipients based on each
recipient's share of the trust's total QBI (whether or not distributed)
for that taxable year.
Any QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP income of the
trust that is unrelated business taxable income is subject to excise
tax and Sec. 1.664-1(c) requires that tax to be allocated to the
corpus of the trust. Certain other rules relating to charitable
remainder trusts are provided.
B. Split-interest Trusts
The August Proposed Regulations requested comments on whether any
special rules were necessary with respect to split-interest trusts. One
commenter suggested that additional rules may be necessary for split-
interest trusts other than charitable reminder trusts. After
considering the comment and studying other split-interest trusts in
more depth after the publication of the August Proposed Regulations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that special rules
for other split-interest trusts, such as non-grantor charitable lead
trusts or pooled income funds, are not necessary because such trusts
are taxable under part I, subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code, except
subpart E. Such split-interest trusts would apply the rules for non-
grantor trusts and estates set forth in Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3) to
determine any applicable section 199A deduction for the trust or its
taxable beneficiaries.
C. Separate Shares
Although no comments were received with respect the application of
the threshold amount to separate shares, the Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that clarification with respect to this issue may be
necessary. These proposed regulations provide that, in the case of a
trust described in section 663(c) with substantially separate and
independent shares for multiple beneficiaries, such separate shares
will not be treated as separate trusts for purposes of applying the
threshold amount. Instead, the trust will be treated as a single trust
for purposes of determining whether the taxable income of the trust
exceeds the threshold amount. The purpose of the separate share rule in
section 663(c) is to treat distributions of trust DNI to trust
beneficiaries as independent taxable events solely for purposes of
applying sections 661 and 662 with respect to each beneficiary's
separate share. The rule determines each beneficiary's share of DNI
based on the amount of DNI from that beneficiary's separate share,
rather than as a percentage of the trust's DNI.
Nevertheless, under the separate share rule, if a trust retains any
portion of DNI, the trust will be subject to tax as a single trust with
respect to the retained DNI. Only trusts with retained DNI will be
eligible for the section 199A deduction, because a trust will be
allocated QBI, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income only
in proportion to the amount of DNI retained by the trust for the
taxable year. For this reason, a trust, regardless of the number of
separate shares it has for its beneficiaries under the separate share
rule of section 663(c), will be treated as a single trust for purposes
of applying the threshold amount under section 199A. To the extent that
a taxable beneficiary of a trust receives a distribution of DNI from
the beneficiary's separate share of the trust which includes section
199A items, the beneficiary would apply its own threshold amount to
those section 199A items in computing its section 199A deduction in
accordance with the rules of Sec. 1.199A-6(d).
Availability of IRS Documents
IRS notices cited in this preamble are made available by the
Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
Section 7805(b)(1)(A) and (B) of the Code generally provide that no
temporary, proposed, or final regulation relating to the internal
revenue laws may apply to any taxable period ending before the earliest
of (A) the date on which such regulation is filed with the Federal
Register, or (B) in the case of a final regulation, the date on which a
proposed or temporary regulation to which the final regulation relates
was filed with the Federal Register.
The amendments to Sec. Sec. 1.199A-3 and 1.199A-6 set forth in
this notice of proposed rulemaking generally are proposed to apply to
taxable years ending after the date of publication of a Treasury
decision adopting these rules as final regulations in the Federal
Register. However, taxpayers may rely on the rules in the amendments to
Sec. Sec. 1.199A-3 and 1.199A-6 set forth in this notice of proposed
rulemaking, in their entirety, until the date a Treasury decision
adopting these regulations as final regulations is published in the
Federal Register.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review--Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
[[Page 3020]]
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility.
The proposed regulations have been designated by the Office of
Management and Budget's (``OMB'') Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (``OIRA'') as subject to review under Executive Order 12866
pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the
Treasury Department and OMB regarding review of tax regulations. It has
been determined that the proposed rulemaking is economically
significant under section 1(c) of the Memorandum of Agreement and
thereby subject to review. Accordingly, the proposed regulations have
been reviewed by OMB.
A. Overview
Congress enacted section 199A to provide taxpayers other than
corporations a deduction of up to 20 percent of QBI from domestic
businesses plus up to 20 percent of their combined qualified REIT
dividends and qualified PTP income. As stated in the Explanation of
Provisions, these regulations are necessary to provide taxpayers with
computational, definitional, and anti-avoidance guidance regarding the
application of section 199A. These proposed regulations contain
amendments to Sec. 1.199A-3, providing further guidance to taxpayers
for purposes of calculating the section 199A deduction. They provide
clarity for taxpayers in determining their eligibility for the
deduction and the amount of the allowed deduction. Among other
benefits, this clarity helps ensure that taxpayers all calculate the
deduction in a similar manner, which encourages decision-making that is
economically efficient contingent on the provisions of the overall
Code.
B. Baseline
The analysis in this section compares the proposed regulation to a
no-action baseline reflecting anticipated Federal income tax-related
behavior in the absence of these regulations.
C. Economic Analysis of the Proposed Amendments to Sec. 1.199A-3
1. Background
Because the section 199A deduction has not previously been
available, Sec. Sec. 1.199A-1 through 1.199A-6 provide greater
specificity for a large number of the relevant terms and necessary
calculations taxpayers are currently required to apply under the
statute. However, one subject not covered by the August 2018 Proposed
Regulations is the treatment of REIT dividends received by RICs.
Because RICs are taxed as C corporations, they are ineligible for the
section 199A deduction under the statute, which generally does not
apply to C corporations. However, the statute also directs the
Secretary to prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out
the purposes of section 199A, including regulations for its application
in the case of tiered entities. Thus these proposed regulations
establish rules under which a RIC that earns qualified REIT dividends
may pay section 199A dividends to its shareholders.
An alternative approach the Treasury Department and the IRS could
have taken would be to remain silent on this issue. For reasons given
below, the Treasury Department and the IRS concluded such an approach
would likely give rise to less economically efficient decisions than
the approach taken in these proposed regulations.
2. Anticipated Benefits of the Proposed Amendments to Sec. 1.199A-3
The Treasury Department and the IRS expect that the definitions and
guidance provided in the proposed amendments to Sec. 1.199A-3 will
implement the section 199A deduction in an economically efficient
manner. An economically efficient tax system generally aims to treat
income derived from similar economic decisions similarly in order to
reduce incentives to make choices based on tax rather than market
incentives. In absence of these proposed regulations, the section 199A
statute would not accomplish this in the case of REIT dividends. Under
the statute and the section 199A final regulations, individuals who
directly hold ownership interests in a REIT would generally qualify for
the section 199A deduction on their qualified REIT dividends. However,
individuals who are shareholders of a RIC that has an ownership
interest in a REIT would not receive any benefit from section 199A on
REIT dividends received by the RIC, even if the RIC pays dividends to
the individual. Thus, in the absence of these supplemental proposed
regulations, a market distortion is introduced by section 199A whereby
direct ownership of REITs is tax-advantaged relative to indirect
ownership of REITs through RICs.
These proposed regulations remove this distortion. The proposed
amendments to Sec. 1.199A-3 establish rules under which a RIC that
earns qualified REIT dividends may pay section 199A dividends to its
shareholders, such that the effective tax treatment of qualified REIT
dividends is similar under the proposed regulations regardless of
whether a taxpayer invests in a REIT directly or through a RIC.
3. Anticipated Costs of the Proposed Amendments to Sec. 1.199A-3
The Treasury Department and the IRS do not anticipate any
meaningful economic distortions to be induced by the proposed
amendments to Sec. 1.199A-3 because the proposed amendments seek to
continue to provide similar tax treatment to REIT income regardless of
whether it is held directly or through a RIC. Prior to TCJA, the tax
treatment was similar, but TCJA made REIT dividends eligible for the
section 199A deduction, and the section 199A final regulations did not
address this uncertainty. This proposed amendment ensures that REIT
income earned through a RIC is also eligible for the same deduction.
RICs are financial intermediaries, and, as a general rule, economic
distortion is minimized to the extent that the tax consequences of
investment through an intermediary correspond to the tax consequences
of direct investment. The Treasury Department and the IRS request
comments regarding any anticipated economic costs. Changes to the
collective paperwork burden arising from this and other sections of
these regulations are discussed in section D, Anticipated impacts on
administrative and compliance costs, of this analysis.
D. Anticipated Impacts on Administrative and Compliance Costs
The proposed regulations add to the compliance costs of RICs and
intermediaries such as brokerage firms that hold RIC shares. In order
for a RIC's shareholders to benefit from the section 199A deduction on
qualified REIT dividends earned by the RIC, the proposed regulations
require the RIC to compute and report section 199A dividends to its
shareholders. Though many RICs keep detailed records of their
investment portfolios, this action nonetheless creates non-trivial
administrative costs for any RICs and intermediaries that wish to
provide section 199A dividends to their shareholders. These costs and
the associated impacted tax forms are described in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of this proposed amendment.
[[Page 3021]]
E. Executive Order 13771
These regulations have been designated as regulatory under E.O.
13771.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information required by this proposed regulation
is in proposed Sec. 1.199A-3. The collection of information in
proposed Sec. 1.199A-3 is required for RICs that choose to report
information regarding qualified REIT dividends to their shareholders.
It is necessary to report the information to the IRS and relevant
taxpayers in order to ensure that taxpayers properly report in
accordance with the rules of the proposed regulations the correct
amount of deduction under section 199A. The collection of information
in proposed Sec. 1.199A-3 is satisfied by providing information about
section 199A dividends as Form 1099-DIV and its instructions may
prescribe.
For purpose of the PRA, the reporting burden associated with Sec.
1.199A-3 will be reflected in the IRS Form 14029, Paperwork Reduction
Act Submission, associated with Form 1099-DIV (OMB control number 1545-
0110). The burden associated with the information collection in the
proposed regulations represents 1.567 million hours and $149 million
($2018) annually to comply with the information collection requirement
in the proposed regulations. The burden hours estimate was derived from
IRS's legacy burden model and is discussed in further detail on 1545-
0110. The hourly rate is derived from RAAS's Business Taxpayer Burden
model that relates time and out-of-pocket costs of business tax
preparation, derived from survey data, to assets and receipts of
affected taxpayers along with other relevant variables, and converted
by the Treasury Department to $2017. The Treasury Department and the
IRS request comments on all aspects of information collection burdens
related to the proposed regulations. In addition, when available,
drafts of the applicable IRS forms are posted for comment at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099div.pdf.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that the collections of information in
proposed Sec. 1.199A-3 will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The collection in proposed Sec. 1.199A-3 applies only to RICs that
pay section 199A dividends. As described above, Congress created RICs
to give small investors access to the professional management and asset
diversification that are available only with very large investment
portfolios. To insure appropriate non-tax regulation of these
substantial investment portfolios, subchapter M of chapter 1 of
subtitle A the Code requires that such RICs must be eligible for
registration, and must actually be registered, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940. There are
some small businesses that are publicly traded, but most publicly
traded businesses are not small entities as defined by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Thus, the Treasury Department and IRS expect that most
RICs are not small entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined
that the collection of information in this notice of proposed
rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact. Accordingly, a
regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Notwithstanding this certification,
the Treasury Department and the IRS invite comments from interested
members of the public on both the number of entities affected and the
economic impact on small entities.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects
of the proposed rules.
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the ADDRESSES heading.
All comments will be available at www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any
person that timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, then notice of the date, time, and place for the public
hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Michael Y. Chin and
Steven Harrison, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial
Institutions and Products) and Robert Alinsky, Vishal R. Amin, Margaret
Burow, and Frank J. Fisher, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries). However, other personnel from
the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citations for part 1 are revised by amending
sectional authorities for Sec. Sec. 1.199A-3 and 1.199A-6 to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.199A-3 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(c)(4)(C) and
(f)(4).
* * * * *
Section 1.199A-6 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(f)(1)(B) and
(f)(4).
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.199A-0 is amended by:
0
1. Adding entries for Sec. 1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv)(A) and (B).
0
2. Adding entries for Sec. 1.199A-3(d), (d)(1) and (2), (d)(2)(i)
through (iii), (d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B), (d)(3), (d)(3)(i) through (v),
(d)(4), (d)(4)(i) and (ii), and (d)(5) and (6).
0
3. Adding entries for Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(iii) and (v).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.199A-0 Table of contents.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.199A-3 Qualified business income, qualified REIT dividends,
and qualified PTP income.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) In general.
(B) Attributes of disallowed loss determined in year loss is
incurred.
* * * * *
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a regulated investment company.
(1) In general.
(2) Definition of section 199A dividend.
(i) In general.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess reported amounts.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported amount.
[[Page 3022]]
(A) In general.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year RICs.
(3) Definitions.
(i) Reported section 199A dividend amount.
(ii) Excess reported amount.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount.
(iv) Post-December reported amount.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A dividends by shareholders.
(i) In general.
(ii) Holding period.
(5) Example.
(6) Applicability date.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.199A-6 Relevant passthrough entities (RPEs), publicly traded
partnerships (PTPs), trusts, and estates.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares.
* * * * *
(v) Charitable remainder trusts.
* * * * *
0
Par. 3. Section 1.199A-3 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv)
and adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.199A-3 Qualified business income, qualified REIT dividends,
and qualified PTP income.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
__(1) * * *
(iv) Previously disallowed losses--(A) In general. Previously
disallowed losses or deductions (including losses disallowed under
sections 465, 469, 704(d), and 1366(d)) allowed in the taxable year
generally are taken into account for purposes of computing QBI to the
extent the disallowed loss or deduction is otherwise allowed by section
199A and this section. These losses shall be used, for purposes of
section 199A and these regulations, in order from the oldest to the
most recent on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and shall be treated
as losses from a separate trade or business. To the extent such losses
relate to a PTP, they must be treated as a loss from a separate PTP in
the taxable year the losses are taken into account. However, losses or
deductions that were disallowed, suspended, limited, or carried over
from taxable years ending before January 1, 2018 (including under
sections 465, 469, 704(d), and 1366(d)), are not taken into account in
a later taxable year for purposes of computing QBI.
(B) Attributes of disallowed loss determined in year loss is
incurred. Whether a disallowed loss or deduction is attributable to a
trade or business, and otherwise meets the requirements of this section
is determined in the year the loss is incurred. Whether a disallowed
loss or deduction is attributable to a specified service trade or
business (including whether an individual has taxable income under the
threshold amount, within the phase-in range, or in excess of the phase-
in range) also is determined in the year the loss is incurred. To the
extent a loss is partially disallowed, QBI in the year of disallowance
must be reduced proportionately.
* * * * *
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a regulated investment company--
(1) In general. If section 852(b) applies to a regulated investment
company (RIC) for a taxable year, the RIC may pay section 199A
dividends, as defined in this paragraph (d).
(2) Definition of section 199A dividend--(i) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section, a section 199A
dividend is any dividend or part of such a dividend that a RIC pays to
its shareholders and reports as a section 199A dividend in written
statements furnished to its shareholders.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess reported amounts. If the
aggregate reported amount with respect to the RIC for any taxable year
exceeds the RIC's qualified REIT dividend income for the taxable year,
then a section 199A dividend is equal to--
(A) The reported section 199A dividend amount, reduced by;
(B) The excess reported amount that is allocable to that reported
section 199A dividend amount.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported amount--(A) In general. Except
as provided in paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, the excess
reported amount (if any) that is allocable to the reported section 199A
dividend amount is that portion of the excess reported amount that
bears the same ratio to the excess reported amount as the reported
section 199A dividend amount bears to the aggregate reported amount.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year RICs. In the case of any
taxable year that does not begin and end in the same calendar year, if
the post-December reported amount equals or exceeds the excess reported
amount for that taxable year, paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(A) of this section
is applied by substituting ``post-December reported amount'' for
``aggregate reported amount,'' and no excess reported amount is
allocated to any dividend paid on or before December 31 of that taxable
year.
(3) Definitions. For purposes of paragraph (d) of this section--
(i) Reported section 199A dividend amount. The term reported
section 199A dividend amount means the amount of a dividend
distribution reported to the RIC's shareholders under paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section as a section 199A dividend.
(ii) Excess reported amount. The term excess reported amount means
the excess of the aggregate reported amount over the RIC's qualified
REIT dividend income for the taxable year.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount. The term aggregate reported amount
means the aggregate amount of dividends reported by the RIC under
paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section as section 199A dividends for the
taxable year (including section 199A dividends paid after the close of
the taxable year and described in section 855).
(iv) Post-December reported amount. The term post-December reported
amount means the aggregate reported amount determined by taking into
account only dividends paid after December 31 of the taxable year.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income. The term qualified REIT
dividend income means, with respect to a taxable year of a RIC, the
excess of the amount of qualified REIT dividends, as defined in Sec.
1.199A-3(c)(2), includible in the RIC's taxable income for the taxable
year over the amount of the RIC's deductions that are properly
allocable to such income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A dividends by shareholders--(i) In
general. For purposes of section 199A and the regulations under section
199A, a section 199A dividend is treated by a taxpayer that receives
the section 199A dividend as a qualified REIT dividend.
(ii) Holding period. Paragraph (d)(4)(i) does not apply to any
dividend received with respect to a share of RIC stock--
(A) That is held by the shareholder for 45 days or less (taking
into account the principles of section 246(c)(3) and (4)) during the
91-day period beginning on the date which is 45 days before the date on
which the share becomes ex-dividend with respect to such dividend; or
(B) To the extent that the shareholder is under an obligation
(whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related
payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related
property.
(5) Example. The following example illustrates the provisions of
this paragraph (d).
(i) Example. (A) X is a corporation that has elected to be a
RIC. For its taxable year ending March 31, 2019, X has $25,000x of
net long-term capital gain, $60,000x of qualified dividend income,
$25,000x of taxable interest
[[Page 3023]]
income, $15,000x of net short-term capital gain, and $25,000x of
qualified REIT dividends. X has $15,000x of deductible expenses, of
which $3,000x is allocable to the qualified REIT dividends. On
December 31, 2018, X pays a single dividend of $100,000x on December
31, and reports $20,000x of the dividend as a section 199A dividend
in written statements to its shareholders. On March 31, 2019, X pays
a dividend of $35,000x, and reports $5,000x of the dividend as a
section 199A dividend in written statements to its shareholders.
(B) X's qualified REIT dividend income under paragraph (d)(3)(v)
of this section is $22,000x, which is the excess of X's $25,000x of
qualified REIT dividends over $3,000x in allocable expenses. The
reported section 199A dividend amounts for the December 31, 2018,
and March 31, 2019, distributions are $20,000x and $5,000x,
respectively. For the taxable year ending March 31, 2019, the
aggregate reported amount of section 199A dividends is $25,000x, and
the excess reported amount under paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this
section is $3,000x. Because X is a noncalendar-year RIC and the
post-December reported amount of $5,000x exceeds the excess reported
amount of $3,000x, the entire excess reported amount is allocated
under paragraphs (d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B) of this section to the
reported section 199A dividend amount for the March 31, 2019,
distribution. No portion of the excess reported amount is allocated
to the reported section 199A dividend amount for the December 31,
2018, distribution. Thus, the section 199A dividend on March 31,
2019, is $2,000x, which is the reported section 199A dividend amount
of $5,000x reduced by the $3,000x of allocable excess reported
amount. The section 199A dividend on December 31, 2018, is the
$20,000x that X reports as a section 199A dividend.
(C) Shareholder A, a United States person, receives a dividend
from X of $100x on December 31, 2018, of which $20x is reported as a
section 199A dividend. If A meets the holding period requirements in
paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section with respect to the stock of X,
A treats $20x of the dividend from X as a qualified REIT dividend
for purposes of section 199A for A's 2018 taxable year.
(D) A receives a dividend from X of $35x on March 31, 2019, of
which $5x is reported as a section 199A dividend. If A meets the
holding period requirements in paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section
with respect to the stock of X, A may only treat $2x of the dividend
from X as a section 199A dividend for A's 2019 taxable year.
(6) Applicability date. The provisions of paragraph (d) of this
section apply to taxable years ending after the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as final regulations is published
in the Federal Register. However, taxpayers may rely on the rules of
this section until the date the Treasury decision adopting these
regulations as final regulations is published in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
0
Par. 4. Section 1.199A-6 is amended by adding paragraphs (d)(3)(iii)
and (v) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.199A-6 Relevant passthrough entities (RPEs), publicly traded
partnerships (PTPs), trusts, and estates.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares. In the case of a trust described in section
663(c) with substantially separate and independent shares for multiple
beneficiaries, such trust will be treated as a single trust for
purposes of determining whether the taxable income of the trust exceeds
the threshold amount.
* * * * *
(v) Charitable remainder trusts. A charitable remainder trust
described in section 664 is not entitled to and does not calculate a
section 199A deduction and the threshold amount described in section
199A(e)(2) does not apply to the trust. However, any taxable recipient
of a unitrust or annuity amount from the trust must determine and apply
the recipient's own threshold amount for purposes of section 199A
taking into account any annuity or unitrust amounts received from the
trust. A recipient of a unitrust or annuity amount from a trust may
take into account QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP
income for purposes of determining the recipient's section 199A
deduction for the taxable year to the extent that the unitrust or
annuity amount distributed to such recipient consists of such section
199A items under Sec. 1.664-1(d). For example, if a charitable
remainder trust has investment income of $500, qualified dividend
income of $200, and qualified REIT dividends of $1,000, and distributes
$1,000 to the recipient, the trust would be treated as having income in
two classes within the category of income described in Sec. 1.664-
1(d)(1)(i)(a)(1), for purposes of Sec. 1.664-1(d)(1)(ii)(b). Because
the annuity amount first carries out income in the class subject to the
highest income tax rate, the entire annuity payment comes from the
class with the investment income and qualified REIT dividends. Thus,
the charitable remainder trust would be treated as distributing a
proportionate amount of the investment income ($500/(1,000+500)*1,000 =
$333) and qualified REIT dividends ($1000/(1,000+500)*1000 = $667)
because the investment income and qualified REIT dividends are taxed at
the same rate and within the same class, which is higher than the rate
of tax for the qualified dividend income which is in a separate class.
The charitable remainder trust in this example would not be treated as
distributing any of the qualified dividend income until it distributed
all of the investment income and qualified REIT dividends (more than
$1,500 in total) to the recipient. To the extent that a trust is
treated as distributing QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP
income to more than one unitrust or annuity recipient in the taxable
year, the distribution of such income will be treated as made to the
recipients proportionately, based on their respective shares of the
total of QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP income
distributed for that year. The trust allocates and reports any W-2
wages or UBIA of qualified property to the taxable recipient of the
annuity or unitrust interest based on each recipient's share of the
trust's total QBI (whether or not distributed) for that taxable year.
Accordingly, if 10 percent of the QBI of a charitable remainder trust
is distributed to the recipient and 90 percent of the QBI is retained
by the trust, 10 percent of the W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified
property is allocated and reported to the recipient and 90 percent of
the W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified property is treated as retained by
the trust. However, any W-2 wages retained by the trust do not carry
over to subsequent taxable years for section 199A purposes. Any QBI,
qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP income of the trust that is
unrelated business taxable income is subject to excise tax and that tax
must be allocated to the corpus of the trust under Sec. 1.664-1(c).
* * * * *
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2019-01023 Filed 2-4-19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P